Firm profile

Edward Jones

ST. LOUIS, MOCRD 250Registration Status: ApprovedEffective since October 24, 1963SEC # 801-3297Latest ADV September 25, 2026

Edward Jones is an SEC registered investment adviser organized as a limited partnership with a primary office location in St. Louis, MO.

Assets Under Management
$1.0T
Employees
36,317
Offices
15,121 offices
Total Clients
4,069,320

Associated firm names

3 names listed
  • EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P.
  • EDWARD JONES GENERATIONS
  • EDWARD JONES

Leadership

5 roles identified
CEOPenelope Pennington
CCOElizabeth E O'hanlon
CCOJennifer A Grego

Advisory services offered

5 types reported
Financial Planning Services
Pension consulting services
Portfolio management for businesses

Fee models offered

3 types reported
Asset based fees
Fixed fees
Other fee arrangements

Offices & Contact

Primary office

ST. LOUIS, Missouri, United States

Loading map…

Primary office regionOther reported regions

Shading shows states and countries with reported offices. Cities are listed below; shading does not indicate service coverage.

Missouri

ST. LOUISPrimary office · ST LOUIS · MARYLAND HEIGHTS · COLUMBIA

Arizona

TEMPE · SCOTTSDALE · GILBERT

California

BURBANK

Colorado

LAKEWOOD

Florida

WEST PALM BEACH · CLEARWATER

Georgia

PEACHTREE CITY · DACULA

Illinois

NAPERVILLE · ALGONQUIN

Iowa

HUXLEY

Massachusetts

NEEDHAM

New York

NEW YORK

South Carolina

GREENVILLE

Texas

VICTORIA · AUSTIN

26 office records listed · 15,121 total offices reported. Counts can use different reporting dates. SEC filers may list only their largest 25 additional offices.

Contact and digital presence

ADV profile links

Regulatory Assets Under Management Breakdown

Total regulatory assets under management$1.0Tas of September 25, 2026
Discretionary48.8%
$494.3B
49% of total RAUM48.8%
Non-discretionary51.2%
$519.3B
51% of total RAUM51.2%
Regulatory assets under management are split between discretionary and non-discretionary assets.

Client Coverage Demographics

Top client segmentIndividuals represent 89.9% of total clients.
Top client categories% of clientsClients
1
Individuals
89.9%
3,657,451
2
HNWI
9.2%
372,771
3
Pension Plans
0.5%
20,833
4
Corporations
0.3%
10,848
5
PARTNERSHIPS, INVESTMENT CLUBS AND LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES
0.1%
5,375
Additional categories (<0.1%)
Banks<5 clients
Categories with <5 clients
Banking or thrift institutions<5 clients

Assets under management Growth by Quarter

Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.

Total AUM$1.0T
Total Accounts5,630,517
10Y AUM Change+$809.4B (+396.4%)

Private Funds

Private funds reported by Edward Jones

Loading private fund disclosures…

Employee Growth by Quarter

Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.

Total Employees36,317
Clients per Employee112:1
10Y Employee Change+15,314 (+72.9%)

Historical AUM and employee figures reflect available SEC Form ADV filings under this CRD. Filing gaps may reflect registration status changes, dormant periods, state registration periods, firm restructuring, or other reporting changes. Rialytix does not interpolate missing periods.


Ownership

Reported direct and indirect ownership ranges

Each range applies to a separate reported relationship and should not be added together.

Reported ownership ranges

Highlighted bands show the percentage range reported in Form ADV.

0%25%50%75%100%
THE JONES FINANCIAL COMPANIES, L.L.L.P.Direct owner · Schedule AInterest in EDWARD JONES
75%+
EDJ HOLDING COMPANY, INC.Direct owner · Schedule AInterest in EDWARD JONES
< 5%
THE JONES FINANCIAL COMPANIES, L.L.L.P.Indirect owner · Schedule BInterest in JFC HOLDING COMPANY, INC.
75%+
JFC HOLDING COMPANY, INC.Indirect owner · Schedule BInterest in EDJ HOLDING COMPANY, INC.
75%+

Bars represent the reported range at that individual ownership step, not an estimated percentage of the advisory firm. Indirect relationships may refer to intermediate entities rather than directly to Edward Jones.

Reported ownership and control details

Form ADV · Filing date 2026-09-25 · Schedules A and B

15 entries
#Owner / person & roleInterest in entityReported interestControl personTitle / status acquiredSource
1EDJ HOLDING COMPANY, INC.GENERAL PARTNERDomestic entityEDWARD JONESLess than 5%Code NAYesGENERAL PARTNER08/1987Schedule APDF page 46
2THE JONES FINANCIAL COMPANIES, L.L.L.P.LIMITED PARTNERDomestic entityEDWARD JONES75% or moreCode EYesLIMITED PARTNER08/1987Schedule APDF page 46
3PENELOPE PENNINGTONCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERIndividualEDWARD JONESLess than 5%Code NAYesCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER01/2019Schedule APDF page 46
4ANDREW TIMOTHY MIEDLERCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERIndividualEDWARD JONESLess than 5%Code NAYesCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER11/2021Schedule APDF page 46
5DAVID CHUBAKHEAD OF WEALTH MANAGEMENT & FIELD MANAGEMENTIndividualEDWARD JONESLess than 5%Code NAYesHEAD OF WEALTH MANAGEMENT & FIELD MANAGEMENT09/2022Schedule APDF page 46
6KEIR DEVON GUMBSCHIEF LEGAL OFFICERIndividualEDWARD JONESLess than 5%Code NAYesCHIEF LEGAL OFFICER11/2023Schedule APDF page 46
7TODD JUDSON PURDYHEAD OF OPERATIONSIndividualEDWARD JONESLess than 5%Code NAYesHEAD OF OPERATIONS01/2024Schedule APDF page 46
8JENNIFER A GREGOCHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER - BROKER/DEALERIndividualEDWARD JONESLess than 5%Code NAYesCHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER - BROKER/DEALER09/2025Schedule APDF page 46
9KRISTIN MICHELE JOHNSONCHIEF OPERATING OFFICERIndividualEDWARD JONESLess than 5%Code NAYesCHIEF OPERATING OFFICER06/2025Schedule APDF page 46
10DAVID ALEXANDER GUNNHEAD OF U.S. BUSINESS UNITIndividualEDWARD JONESLess than 5%Code NAYesHEAD OF U.S. BUSINESS UNIT06/2025Schedule APDF page 46
11ELIZABETH E O'HANLONCHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER - INVESTMENT ADVISORIndividualEDWARD JONESLess than 5%Code NANoCHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER - INVESTMENT ADVISOR09/2025Schedule APDF page 46
12JOSEPH LAWRENCE KLOCKECO-HEAD OF SUPERVISIONIndividualEDWARD JONESLess than 5%Code NANoCO-HEAD OF SUPERVISION06/2025Schedule APDF page 46
13CASEY JOHN WHALLEYCO-HEAD OF SUPERVISIONIndividualEDWARD JONESLess than 5%Code NANoCO-HEAD OF SUPERVISION06/2025Schedule APDF page 46
14THE JONES FINANCIAL COMPANIES, L.L.L.P.SOLE SHAREHOLDERDomestic entityJFC HOLDING COMPANY, INC.75% or moreCode EYesSOLE SHAREHOLDER11/2020Schedule BPDF page 47
15JFC HOLDING COMPANY, INC.SOLE SHAREHOLDERDomestic entityEDJ HOLDING COMPANY, INC.75% or moreCode EYesSOLE SHAREHOLDER11/2020Schedule BPDF page 47

Less than 5% may include zero. Code F identifies a role without specifying a percentage. Reported interests may overlap and may not include every owner. Total indirect ownership is not calculated.

Compliance & Disclosures

Filing dated 9/25/2026 3:39:11 PM

Responses were selected by the RIA in its filing. Questions are shortened for readability; “you” refers to the reporting firm, and some questions also cover advisory affiliates.

RIA or supervised-person involvementThe RIA reported that one or more events below involve the firm or its supervised persons.RIA responseYes
AFelonies1 Yes1 No

In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:

  • A1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a felony?No
  • A2Been charged with a felony?Yes
BMisdemeanors2 Yes

In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:

  • B1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a misdemeanor involving investments, an investment-related business, fraud, false statements or omissions, wrongful taking of property, bribery, perjury, forgery, counterfeiting, or extortion?Yes
  • B2Been charged with a misdemeanor of the kind listed above?Yes
CSEC or CFTC actions4 Yes1 No

Has the SEC or CFTC ever:

  • C1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?Yes
  • C2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated SEC or CFTC regulations or statutes?Yes
  • C3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
  • C4Entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?Yes
  • C5Imposed a civil money penalty on you or an advisory affiliate, or ordered you or an advisory affiliate to cease and desist from any activity?Yes
DOther regulatory actions4 Yes1 No

Has any other federal regulatory agency, state regulatory agency, or foreign financial regulatory authority ever:

  • D1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission, or was dishonest, unfair, or unethical?Yes
  • D2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related regulations or statutes?Yes
  • D3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
  • D4In the past ten years, entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?Yes
  • D5Denied, suspended, or revoked your or an advisory affiliate’s registration or license, or otherwise prevented association with an investment-related business or restricted activities?Yes
ESelf-regulatory organization actions2 Yes2 No

Has a self-regulatory organization or commodities exchange ever:

  • E1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
  • E2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated its rules, other than a violation designated as a minor rule violation under an SEC-approved plan?Yes
  • E3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
  • E4Disciplined you or an advisory affiliate by expulsion, suspension, barring association with other members, or otherwise restricting activities?Yes
FProfessional authorizations1 Yes
  • FHas an authorization to act as an attorney, accountant, or federal contractor granted to you or an advisory affiliate ever been revoked or suspended?Yes
GPending regulatory proceedings1 Yes
  • GAre you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a regulatory proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of C, D, or E?Yes
HCivil judicial actions and proceedings4 No

(1) Court actions

Has a domestic or foreign court:

  • H(1)(a)In the past ten years, enjoined you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
  • H(1)(b)Found that you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related statutes or regulations?No
  • H(1)(c)Dismissed, pursuant to a settlement agreement, an investment-related civil action brought against you or an advisory affiliate by a state or foreign financial regulatory authority?No

(2) Pending civil proceedings

  • H(2)Are you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a civil proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of H(1)?No
Additional DRP filings 173 source blocks

Verbatim excerpts from supporting DRP filings, which may concern the firm or advisory affiliates. Amounts retain their filed labels; no total or attribution is inferred.

criminal · block 1PDF pages 48–49
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.A. or
11.B. of Form ADV.
Criminal
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.A(1)
11.A(2)
11.B(1)
11.B(2)
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
Multiple counts of the same charge arising out of the same event(s) should be reported on the same DRP. Unrelated criminal actions, including separate
cases arising out of the same event, must be reported on separate DRPs. Use this DRP to report all charges arising out of the same event. One event may
result in more than one affirmative answer to the items listed above.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
6832883
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
Jiang, Zhiwei
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  If charge(s) were brought against an organization over which you or an advisory affiliate exercise(d) control: Enter organization name, whether or not
the organization was an investment-related business and your or the advisory affiliate's position, title, or relationship. 
2.
Formal Charge(s) were brought in: (include name of Federal, Military, State or Foreign Court, Location of Court - City or County and State or Country,
Docket/Case number). 
3.
Event Disclosure Detail (Use this for both organizational and individual charges.)
A. Date First Charged (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
B.
Event Disclosure Detail (include Charge(s)/Charge Description(s), and for each charge provide: (1) number of counts, (2) felony or misdemeanor,
(3) plea for each charge, and (4) product type if charge is investment-related). 

C.
Did any of the Charge(s) within the Event involve a felony? 
 Yes
 No
D.
Current status of the Event? 
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
E.
Event Status Date (complete unless status is Pending) (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Disposition Disclosure Detail: 
Include for each charge (a) Disposition Type (e.g., convicted, acquitted, dismissed, pretrial, etc.), (b) Date, (c) Sentence/Penalty, (d) Duration (if
sentence - suspension, probation, etc.), (e) Start Date of Penalty, (f) Penalty/Fine Amount, and (g) Date Paid. 
5.
Provide a brief summary of circumstances leading to the charge(s) as well as the disposition. Include the relevant dates when the conduct which was
the subject of the charge(s) occurred. (Your response must fit within the space provided.)
criminal · block 2PDF pages 49–50
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.A. or
11.B. of Form ADV.
Criminal
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.A(1)
11.A(2)
11.B(1)
11.B(2)
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
Multiple counts of the same charge arising out of the same event(s) should be reported on the same DRP. Unrelated criminal actions, including separate
cases arising out of the same event, must be reported on separate DRPs. Use this DRP to report all charges arising out of the same event. One event may
result in more than one affirmative answer to the items listed above.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
7268841
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
MacIsaac, Connor, Christian
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  If charge(s) were brought against an organization over which you or an advisory affiliate exercise(d) control: Enter organization name, whether or not
the organization was an investment-related business and your or the advisory affiliate's position, title, or relationship. 

2.
Formal Charge(s) were brought in: (include name of Federal, Military, State or Foreign Court, Location of Court - City or County and State or Country,
Docket/Case number). 
3.
Event Disclosure Detail (Use this for both organizational and individual charges.)
A. Date First Charged (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
B.
Event Disclosure Detail (include Charge(s)/Charge Description(s), and for each charge provide: (1) number of counts, (2) felony or misdemeanor,
(3) plea for each charge, and (4) product type if charge is investment-related). 
C.
Did any of the Charge(s) within the Event involve a felony? 
 Yes
 No
D.
Current status of the Event? 
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
E.
Event Status Date (complete unless status is Pending) (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Disposition Disclosure Detail: 
Include for each charge (a) Disposition Type (e.g., convicted, acquitted, dismissed, pretrial, etc.), (b) Date, (c) Sentence/Penalty, (d) Duration (if
sentence - suspension, probation, etc.), (e) Start Date of Penalty, (f) Penalty/Fine Amount, and (g) Date Paid. 
5.
Provide a brief summary of circumstances leading to the charge(s) as well as the disposition. Include the relevant dates when the conduct which was
the subject of the charge(s) occurred. (Your response must fit within the space provided.)
criminal · block 3PDF pages 50–51
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.A. or
11.B. of Form ADV.
Criminal
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.A(1)
11.A(2)
11.B(1)
11.B(2)
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
Multiple counts of the same charge arising out of the same event(s) should be reported on the same DRP. Unrelated criminal actions, including separate
cases arising out of the same event, must be reported on separate DRPs. Use this DRP to report all charges arising out of the same event. One event may
result in more than one affirmative answer to the items listed above.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
5516153
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
Dotas, Kenton, D
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 

B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  If charge(s) were brought against an organization over which you or an advisory affiliate exercise(d) control: Enter organization name, whether or not
the organization was an investment-related business and your or the advisory affiliate's position, title, or relationship. 
2.
Formal Charge(s) were brought in: (include name of Federal, Military, State or Foreign Court, Location of Court - City or County and State or Country,
Docket/Case number). 
3.
Event Disclosure Detail (Use this for both organizational and individual charges.)
A. Date First Charged (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
B.
Event Disclosure Detail (include Charge(s)/Charge Description(s), and for each charge provide: (1) number of counts, (2) felony or misdemeanor,
(3) plea for each charge, and (4) product type if charge is investment-related). 
C.
Did any of the Charge(s) within the Event involve a felony? 
 Yes
 No
D.
Current status of the Event? 
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
E.
Event Status Date (complete unless status is Pending) (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Disposition Disclosure Detail: 
Include for each charge (a) Disposition Type (e.g., convicted, acquitted, dismissed, pretrial, etc.), (b) Date, (c) Sentence/Penalty, (d) Duration (if
sentence - suspension, probation, etc.), (e) Start Date of Penalty, (f) Penalty/Fine Amount, and (g) Date Paid. 
5.
Provide a brief summary of circumstances leading to the charge(s) as well as the disposition. Include the relevant dates when the conduct which was
the subject of the charge(s) occurred. (Your response must fit within the space provided.)
criminal · block 4PDF pages 51–53
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.A. or
11.B. of Form ADV.
Criminal
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.A(1)
11.A(2)
11.B(1)
11.B(2)
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
Multiple counts of the same charge arising out of the same event(s) should be reported on the same DRP. Unrelated criminal actions, including separate
cases arising out of the same event, must be reported on separate DRPs. Use this DRP to report all charges arising out of the same event. One event may
result in more than one affirmative answer to the items listed above.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
7845821
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual

Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
Zhang, Yang
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  If charge(s) were brought against an organization over which you or an advisory affiliate exercise(d) control: Enter organization name, whether or not
the organization was an investment-related business and your or the advisory affiliate's position, title, or relationship. 
2.
Formal Charge(s) were brought in: (include name of Federal, Military, State or Foreign Court, Location of Court - City or County and State or Country,
Docket/Case number). 
3.
Event Disclosure Detail (Use this for both organizational and individual charges.)
A. Date First Charged (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
B.
Event Disclosure Detail (include Charge(s)/Charge Description(s), and for each charge provide: (1) number of counts, (2) felony or misdemeanor,
(3) plea for each charge, and (4) product type if charge is investment-related). 
C.
Did any of the Charge(s) within the Event involve a felony? 
 Yes
 No
D.
Current status of the Event? 
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
E.
Event Status Date (complete unless status is Pending) (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Disposition Disclosure Detail: 
Include for each charge (a) Disposition Type (e.g., convicted, acquitted, dismissed, pretrial, etc.), (b) Date, (c) Sentence/Penalty, (d) Duration (if
sentence - suspension, probation, etc.), (e) Start Date of Penalty, (f) Penalty/Fine Amount, and (g) Date Paid. 
5.
Provide a brief summary of circumstances leading to the charge(s) as well as the disposition. Include the relevant dates when the conduct which was
the subject of the charge(s) occurred. (Your response must fit within the space provided.) 

DRP Pages
regulatory · block 1PICKERING, TRICIA, RENE'PDF pages 53–54
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
PICKERING, TRICIA, RENE'
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
4166189
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
PICKERING, TRICIA, RENE'
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
2.
Principal Sanction:

Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 2LOEFFLER, DONNA, LUNDPDF pages 54–56
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
LOEFFLER, DONNA, LUND
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 

One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
6151836
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
LOEFFLER, DONNA, LUND
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final

9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
Show 167 more source blocks
regulatory · block 3BLANCO, RICHARD, ENRIQUEPDF pages 56–58
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
BLANCO, RICHARD, ENRIQUE
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
728248
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
BLANCO, RICHARD, ENRIQUE
(For individuals, Last, First,

Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:

Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 4Timmons, Gregory, AllenPDF pages 58–59
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
Timmons, Gregory, Allen
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
4824644
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
Timmons, Gregory, Allen
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.

PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 5Mondry, Scott, WaynePDF pages 59–61
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
Mondry, Scott, Wayne
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)

11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
4910195
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
Mondry, Scott, Wayne
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:

Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 6Cowgill, James, MatthewPDF pages 61–63
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
Cowgill, James, Matthew
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.

ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
4433644
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
Cowgill, James, Matthew
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:

A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 7Wright-Ruppert, Carolyn, KimPDF pages 63–64
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
Wright-Ruppert, Carolyn, Kim
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
5027691
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
Wright-Ruppert, Carolyn, Kim
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 

B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 8Valdez, Roy, LeePDF pages 64–66
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
Valdez, Roy, Lee
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
6695751
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
Valdez, Roy, Lee
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:

4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 9Terry, John, MPDF pages 66–68
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
Terry, John, M
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)

You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
6827593
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
Terry, John, M
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:

11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 10Timm, Jonathan, EPDF pages 68–70
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
Timm, Jonathan, E
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
6878313
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
Timm, Jonathan, E
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.

If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 

13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 11Norris, Austin, LeePDF pages 70–71
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
Norris, Austin, Lee
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
4905540
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
Norris, Austin, Lee
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
2.
Principal Sanction:

Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 12Baloun, Mark, StevenPDF pages 71–73
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
Baloun, Mark, Steven
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 

One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
6883888
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
Baloun, Mark, Steven
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final

9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 13Cabrera, Adam, LorenzoPDF pages 73–75
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
Cabrera, Adam, Lorenzo
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
6031597
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
Cabrera, Adam, Lorenzo
(For individuals, Last, First,

Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:

Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 14Martin, RolandPDF pages 75–76
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
Martin, Roland
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
6085052
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
Martin, Roland
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.

PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 15Mitrik, Ryan, AlanPDF pages 76–78
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
Mitrik, Ryan, Alan
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)

11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
6435679
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
Mitrik, Ryan, Alan
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
s
s ou d be
e
o ed
o
t e
eco d because
( ) t e e e t o
p oceed
g occu
ed
o e t a
te
yea s ago o
( ) t e ad
se
s
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:

Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 16Green, Sonya, HudmonPDF pages 78–80
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
Green, Sonya, Hudmon
Regulator name — filed text
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE LICENSEE AND THE DEPARTMENT SUBSEQUENTLY ENTERED INTO A CONSENT ORDER ON AUGUST 2, 2019. THE LICENSEE PAID A REDUCED ADMINISTRATIVE ASSESSMENT OF $250 AND ACKNOWLEDGED THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER. THE DEPARTMENT THEN REINSTATED THE LICENSEE'S INSURANCE PRODUCER LICENSE TO ACTIVE STATUS.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN AN ORDER DATED JULY 11, 2019, THE COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE SUSPENDED LICENSEE'S INSURANCE PRODUCER LICENSE FOR ALLEGED FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE CONTINUING EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS DURING THE LICENSE CYCLE AUGUST 1, 2016 TO JULY 31, 2018. IT WAS LATER DETERMINED THAT LICENSEE DID COMPLY WITH THOSE REQUIREMENTS BUT THAT THE ELECTRONIC SYSTEM UTILIZED BY THE ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE (THE "DEPARTMENT") FAILED TO REFLECT THAT COMPLIANCE.

Sanction detail — filed text

NONE
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.

ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
4071346
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
Green, Sonya, Hudmon
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE
2.
Principal Sanction:
Suspension
Other Sanctions: 
LICENSEE PROVIDED EVIDENCE OF HER TIMELY COMPLETION OF THE REQUIRED CONTINUING EDUCATION AND REQUESTED REINSTATEMENT OF HER
LICENSE. THE LICENSEE AND THE DEPARTMENT SUBSEQUENTLY ENTERED INTO A CONSENT ORDER ON AUGUST 2, 2019. THE LICENSEE PAID A
REDUCED ADMINISTRATIVE ASSESSMENT OF $250 AND ACKNOWLEDGED THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER. THE DEPARTMENT THEN REINSTATED
THE LICENSEE'S INSURANCE PRODUCER LICENSE TO ACTIVE STATUS.
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
07/11/2019
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Insurance
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN AN ORDER DATED JULY 11, 2019, THE COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE SUSPENDED LICENSEE'S INSURANCE PRODUCER LICENSE FOR ALLEGED
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE CONTINUING EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS DURING THE LICENSE CYCLE AUGUST 1, 2016 TO JULY 31, 2018. IT WAS
LATER DETERMINED THAT LICENSEE DID COMPLY WITH THOSE REQUIREMENTS BUT THAT THE ELECTRONIC SYSTEM UTILIZED BY THE ALABAMA
DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE (THE "DEPARTMENT") FAILED TO REFLECT THAT COMPLIANCE.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.

10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
08/02/2019
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
LICENSEE PROVIDED EVIDENCE OF HER TIMELY COMPLETION OF THE REQUIRED CONTINUING EDUCATION AND REQUESTED REINSTATEMENT OF HER
LICENSE. THE LICENSEE AND THE DEPARTMENT SUBSEQUENTLY ENTERED INTO A CONSENT ORDER ON AUGUST 2, 2019. THE LICENSEE PAID A
REDUCED ADMINISTRATIVE ASSESSMENT OF $250 AND ACKNOWLEDGED THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER. THE DEPARTMENT THEN REINSTATED
THE LICENSEE'S INSURANCE PRODUCER LICENSE TO ACTIVE STATUS.
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
CONSENT ORDER DATED AUGUST 2, 2019. LICENSE SUSPENDED FROM AUGUST 1, 2016 - JULY 31, 2018
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
NONE
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE LICENSEE AND THE DEPARTMENT SUBSEQUENTLY ENTERED INTO A CONSENT ORDER ON AUGUST 2, 2019. THE LICENSEE PAID A REDUCED
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSESSMENT OF $250 AND ACKNOWLEDGED THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER. THE DEPARTMENT THEN REINSTATED THE
LICENSEE'S INSURANCE PRODUCER LICENSE TO ACTIVE STATUS.
regulatory · block 17Panettiere, Brian, ToddPDF pages 80–82
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
Panettiere, Brian, Todd
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
6596066
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual

Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
Panettiere, Brian, Todd
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution

 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 18Staten, Ronnie, GalePDF pages 82–83
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
Staten, Ronnie, Gale
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
2309685
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
Staten, Ronnie, Gale
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No

NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 19Charlson, Donald, MichaelPDF pages 83–85
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
Charlson, Donald, Michael
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action

Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
2151716
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
Charlson, Donald, Michael
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):

6.
Principal Product Type:
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 20Scott, Kelby, QuinnPDF pages 85–87
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
Scott, Kelby, Quinn
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates

If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
5581680
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
Scott, Kelby, Quinn
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:

p
p
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 21Condon, David, ArthurPDF pages 87–88
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
Condon, David, Arthur
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
5145580
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
Condon, David, Arthur
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.

This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 22Gasiorowski, NikolaiPDF pages 89–90
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
Gasiorowski, Nikolai
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
5063963
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
Gasiorowski, Nikolai
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 

 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 23Ayoub, AlanPDF pages 90–92
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
Ayoub, Alan
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I

A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
7528633
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
Ayoub, Alan
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.

10. How was matter resolved:
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 24PDF pages 92–94
Regulator name — filed text
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND SECURITIES
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 300,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

IN THE FALL OF 2023, EDWARD JONES IDENTIFIED A HISTORICAL COMPLIANCE DEFICIENCY IN CONNECTION WITH THE PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENT ADVISER REPRESENTATIVE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENT AND SELF-REPORTED THE SAME TO THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND SECURITIES ("THE DEPARTMENT"). ON JANUARY 12, 2024, EDWARD JONES AND THE DEPARTMENT ENTERED INTO A CONSENT ORDER ("THE ORDER"). THE DEPARTMENT ALLEGED THAT FROM IN OR ABOUT JANUARY 2015 THROUGH THE PRESENT, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO REGISTER AT LEAST ONE EMPLOYEE AS AN INVESTMENT ADVISER REPRESENTATIVE IN PENNSYLVANIA IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 301(C.1)(1)(II) OF THE PENNSYLVANIA SECURITIES ACT OF 1972 ("THE 1972 ACT"), 70 P.S. § 1­301(C.1)(1)(II). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS IN THE ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $300,000 AND TO COMPLY WITH THE RELEVANT PROVISION OF THE 1972 ACT.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND SECURITIES (THE "DEPARTMENT") ALLEGED THAT FROM IN OR ABOUT JANUARY 2015 THROUGH THE PRESENT, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO REGISTER AT LEAST ONE EMPLOYEE AS AN INVESTMENT ADVISER REPRESENTATIVE IN PENNSYLVANIA IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 301(C.1)(1)(II) OF THE PENNSYLVANIA SECURITIES ACT OF 1972, 70 P.S. § 1­301(C.1)(1)(II).

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $300,000 AND TO COMPLY WITH THE RELEVANT PROVISION OF THE PENNSYLVANIA SECURITIES ACT OF 1972, 70 P.S. § 1­301(C.1)(1)(II). SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 29, 2024.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.

This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND SECURITIES
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
AGREEMENT TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 301(C.1)(1)(II) OF THE PENNSYLVANIA SECURITIES ACT OF 1972.
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
01/12/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
240001 (SEC-CAO)
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND SECURITIES (THE "DEPARTMENT") ALLEGED THAT FROM IN OR ABOUT JANUARY 2015 THROUGH THE
PRESENT, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO REGISTER AT LEAST ONE EMPLOYEE AS AN INVESTMENT ADVISER REPRESENTATIVE IN PENNSYLVANIA IN
VIOLATION OF SECTION 301(C.1)(1)(II) OF THE PENNSYLVANIA SECURITIES ACT OF 1972, 70 P.S. § 1­301(C.1)(1)(II).
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
01/12/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 300,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
AGREEMENT TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 301(C.1)(1)(II) OF THE PENNSYLVANIA SECURITIES ACT OF 1972.
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to

requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $300,000 AND TO COMPLY WITH THE RELEVANT PROVISION OF THE PENNSYLVANIA
SECURITIES ACT OF 1972, 70 P.S. § 1­301(C.1)(1)(II). SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 29, 2024.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
IN THE FALL OF 2023, EDWARD JONES IDENTIFIED A HISTORICAL COMPLIANCE DEFICIENCY IN CONNECTION WITH THE PENNSYLVANIA INVESTMENT
ADVISER REPRESENTATIVE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENT AND SELF-REPORTED THE SAME TO THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND
SECURITIES ("THE DEPARTMENT"). ON JANUARY 12, 2024, EDWARD JONES AND THE DEPARTMENT ENTERED INTO A CONSENT ORDER ("THE ORDER").
THE DEPARTMENT ALLEGED THAT FROM IN OR ABOUT JANUARY 2015 THROUGH THE PRESENT, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO REGISTER AT LEAST ONE
EMPLOYEE AS AN INVESTMENT ADVISER REPRESENTATIVE IN PENNSYLVANIA IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 301(C.1)(1)(II) OF THE PENNSYLVANIA
SECURITIES ACT OF 1972 ("THE 1972 ACT"), 70 P.S. § 1­301(C.1)(1)(II). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS IN THE ORDER, EDWARD
JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $300,000 AND TO COMPLY WITH THE RELEVANT PROVISION OF THE 1972 ACT.
regulatory · block 25Leflet, Meredith, MargaretPDF pages 94–95
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
Leflet, Meredith, Margaret
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
6102771
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
Leflet, Meredith, Margaret
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.

p
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 26PDF pages 95–97
Regulator name — filed text
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 50,000,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Decision & Order of Offer of Settlement

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON AUGUST 14, 2024, EDWARD JONES ENTERED INTO A SETTLEMENT WITH THE SEC, TO RESOLVE THE MATTER. PRIOR TO THE SETTLEMENT, EDWARD JONES FULLY COOPERATED WITH THE SEC'S INVESTIGATION AND ENHANCED ITS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES CONCERNING THE USE OF APPROVED COMMUNICATION METHODS. THE SETTLEMENT IMPOSES A CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER AND CENSURE, REQUIRES EDWARD JONES TO PAY A CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY OF $50 MILLION, AND REQUIRES EDWARD JONES TO COMPLY WITH UNDERTAKINGS INCLUDING RETENTION OF AN INDEPENDENT COMPLIANCE CONSULTANT TO ASSESS THE FIRM'S POLICIES AND SYSTEMS REGARDING ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS RECORDKEEPING AND ASSIST EDWARD JONES IN FURTHER ENHANCING THOSE POLICIES AND SYSTEMS.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ("SEC"), IN CONNECTION WITH AN INDUSTRY-WIDE INVESTIGATION, ALLEGED EDWARD JONES VIOLATED RECORDKEEPING PROVISIONS OF SECTION 17(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 ("EXCHANGE ACT") AND SECTION 204 OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940 ("ADVISERS ACT") AND SUPERVISORY PROVISIONS OF SECTION 15(B)(4)(E) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND SECTION 203(E)(6) OF THE ADVISERS ACT, AND APPLICABLE RULES THEREUNDER, IN CONNECTION WITH RETENTION OF ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS STORED ON PERSONAL DEVICES OR MESSAGING PLATFORMS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED BY EDWARD JONES FOR BUSINESS USE BY ITS EMPLOYEES.

Sanction detail — filed text

THE SETTLEMENT IMPOSES A CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER AND CENSURE, REQUIRES EDWARD JONES TO PAY A CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY OF $50 MILLION, WHICH WAS PAID ON AUGUST 22, 2024, AND REQUIRES EDWARD JONES TO COMPLY WITH UNDERTAKINGS INCLUDING RETENTION OF AN INDEPENDENT COMPLIANCE CONSULTANT.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.

Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
CEASE AND DESIST, CENSURE AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/14/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
FILE NO. 3-22001
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):

6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ("SEC"), IN CONNECTION WITH AN INDUSTRY-WIDE INVESTIGATION, ALLEGED EDWARD JONES
VIOLATED RECORDKEEPING PROVISIONS OF SECTION 17(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 ("EXCHANGE ACT") AND SECTION 204 OF
THE INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940 ("ADVISERS ACT") AND SUPERVISORY PROVISIONS OF SECTION 15(B)(4)(E) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND
SECTION 203(E)(6) OF THE ADVISERS ACT, AND APPLICABLE RULES THEREUNDER, IN CONNECTION WITH RETENTION OF ELECTRONIC
COMMUNICATIONS STORED ON PERSONAL DEVICES OR MESSAGING PLATFORMS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED BY EDWARD JONES FOR BUSINESS
USE BY ITS EMPLOYEES.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Decision & Order of Offer of Settlement
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
08/14/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 50,000,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
THE SETTLEMENT IMPOSES A CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER AND CENSURE, REQUIRES EDWARD JONES TO PAY A CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY OF $50
MILLION, WHICH WAS PAID ON AUGUST 22, 2024, AND REQUIRES EDWARD JONES TO COMPLY WITH UNDERTAKINGS INCLUDING RETENTION OF
AN INDEPENDENT COMPLIANCE CONSULTANT.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON AUGUST 14, 2024, EDWARD JONES ENTERED INTO A SETTLEMENT WITH THE SEC, TO RESOLVE THE MATTER. PRIOR TO THE SETTLEMENT, EDWARD
JONES FULLY COOPERATED WITH THE SEC'S INVESTIGATION AND ENHANCED ITS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES CONCERNING THE USE OF APPROVED
COMMUNICATION METHODS. THE SETTLEMENT IMPOSES A CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER AND CENSURE, REQUIRES EDWARD JONES TO PAY A CIVIL
MONETARY PENALTY OF $50 MILLION, AND REQUIRES EDWARD JONES TO COMPLY WITH UNDERTAKINGS INCLUDING RETENTION OF AN INDEPENDENT
COMPLIANCE CONSULTANT TO ASSESS THE FIRM'S POLICIES AND SYSTEMS REGARDING ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS RECORDKEEPING AND ASSIST
EDWARD JONES IN FURTHER ENHANCING THOSE POLICIES AND SYSTEMS.
regulatory · block 27PDF pages 97–99
Regulator name — filed text
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 2,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON AUGUST 13, EDWARD JONES ENTERED INTO A CIVIL PENALTY AGREEMENT WITH THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE TO RESOLVE THIS MATTER. PURSUANT TO THE CIVIL PENALTY AGREEMENT, THE FIRM AGREED TO PAY A CIVIL PENALTY OF $2,000 AND TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM VIOLATING ANY LAWS, RULES, OR ORDERS RELATED TO THE DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ENTRUSTED TO THE COMMISSIONER OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE. THE FIRM PAID THE PENALTY ON AUGUST 19, 2024.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES VIOLATED MINN. R. 2876.5021 SUBP. 1 WHEN IT RECEIVED NOTICE OF A UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE COLLATERAL LIEN ON A CUSTOMER ACCOUNT AND GAVE THECUSTOMER AN INCORRECT TOTAL OF HER ASSETS SUBJECT TO THE LIEN AND DID NOT TIMELY PROVIDE THE CUSTOMERWITH HER COLLATERAL-FREE ACCOUNT BALANCE.

Sanction detail — filed text

THE CONSENT ORDER IMPOSES A CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER AND REQUIRES EDWARD JONES TO PAY A $2,000 CIVILPENALTY.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.

Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
CEASE AND DESIST
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/09/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
FILE NO. 84787
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES VIOLATED MINN. R. 2876.5021 SUBP. 1 WHEN IT RECEIVED NOTICE OF A
UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE COLLATERAL LIEN ON A CUSTOMER ACCOUNT AND GAVE THECUSTOMER AN INCORRECT TOTAL OF HER ASSETS SUBJECT
TO THE LIEN AND DID NOT TIMELY PROVIDE THE CUSTOMERWITH HER COLLATERAL-FREE ACCOUNT BALANCE.

8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
08/13/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
THE CIVIL PENALTY AGREEMENT WITH THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE WAS NOT PUBLISHED UNTIL OCTOBER 28, 2024.
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 2,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
THE CONSENT ORDER IMPOSES A CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER AND REQUIRES EDWARD JONES TO PAY A $2,000 CIVILPENALTY.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON AUGUST 13, EDWARD JONES ENTERED INTO A CIVIL PENALTY AGREEMENT WITH THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE TO RESOLVE THIS
MATTER. PURSUANT TO THE CIVIL PENALTY AGREEMENT, THE FIRM AGREED TO PAY A CIVIL PENALTY OF $2,000 AND TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM
VIOLATING ANY LAWS, RULES, OR ORDERS RELATED TO THE DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ENTRUSTED TO THE COMMISSIONER OF THE MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE. THE FIRM PAID THE PENALTY ON AUGUST 19, 2024.
regulatory · block 28PDF pages 99–101
Regulator name — filed text
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 1,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON MARCH 20, 2024, THE FIRM REPORTED ITS JANUARY 2024 CONSENT AGREEMENT WITH THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND SECURITIES (THE "PENNSYLVANIA ORDER") TO THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE(THE "DEPARTMENT") AND ADVISED THE DEPARTMENT OF ITS INADVERTENT OMISSION OF THE PENNSYLVANIA ORDER IN THE FIRM'S JANUARY 22, 2024 RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR ITS INDIANA NONRESIDENT PRODUCER BUSINESS ENTITY LICENSE. PURSUANT TO INDIANA CODE SECTION 27-1-15.6-12(B)(2), THE COMMISSIONER MAY LEVY A CIVIL PENALTY ON AN INSURANCE PRODUCER'S LICENSE FOR VIOLATING AN INSURANCE LAW, INCLUDING INDIANA CODE SECTION 27-1-15.6-17(A). EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A CIVIL PENALTY OF $1,000.00.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

THE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION OF THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES VIOLATED AN INSURANCE LAW AND WAS LIABLE FOR A CIVIL PENALTY UNDER INDIANA CODE § 27­1­15.6­12(B)(2) IN CONNECTION WITH THE FIRM'S FAILURE TO DISCLOSE ITS JANUARY 2024 CONSENT AGREEMENT AND ORDER WITH THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND SECURITIES TO THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE IN A TIMELY MANNER.

Sanction detail — filed text

THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE HAS SET A DEADLINE OF NOVEMBER 20 FOR EDWARD JONES TO PAY THE $1,000 CIVIL PENALTY.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 

If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
10/10/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
23211-AG24-0425-075
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION OF THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES VIOLATED AN INSURANCE LAW AND WAS
LIABLE FOR A CIVIL PENALTY UNDER INDIANA CODE § 27­1­15.6­12(B)(2) IN CONNECTION WITH THE FIRM'S FAILURE TO DISCLOSE ITS JANUARY 2024
CONSENT AGREEMENT AND ORDER WITH THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND SECURITIES TO THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE
IN A TIMELY MANNER.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
10/10/2024
 Exact
 Explanation

If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 1,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY CIVIL PENALTY OF $1,000.00
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE HAS SET A DEADLINE OF NOVEMBER 20 FOR EDWARD JONES TO PAY THE $1,000 CIVIL PENALTY.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON MARCH 20, 2024, THE FIRM REPORTED ITS JANUARY 2024 CONSENT AGREEMENT WITH THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND
SECURITIES (THE "PENNSYLVANIA ORDER") TO THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE(THE "DEPARTMENT") AND ADVISED THE DEPARTMENT OF ITS
INADVERTENT OMISSION OF THE PENNSYLVANIA ORDER IN THE FIRM'S JANUARY 22, 2024 RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR ITS INDIANA NONRESIDENT
PRODUCER BUSINESS ENTITY LICENSE. PURSUANT TO INDIANA CODE SECTION 27-1-15.6-12(B)(2), THE COMMISSIONER MAY LEVY A CIVIL PENALTY ON
AN INSURANCE PRODUCER'S LICENSE FOR VIOLATING AN INSURANCE LAW, INCLUDING INDIANA CODE SECTION 27-1-15.6-17(A). EDWARD JONES
AGREED TO PAY A CIVIL PENALTY OF $1,000.00.
regulatory · block 29Steele, Guy, WilliamPDF pages 101–103
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
Steele, Guy, William
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
1922223
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
Steele, Guy, William
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.

This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to

requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 30PDF pages 103–104
Regulator name — filed text
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS, CORPORATIONS, SECURITIES, AND COMMERCIAL LICENSING BUREAU
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE BUREAU FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER- DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF MCL 451.2412(4)(I) OF THE MICHIGAN UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE STATE TREASURER, STATE OF MICHIGAN. FURTHERMORE, AS MICHIGAN SERVED AS A LEAD STATE IN THIS MATTER, EDWARD JONES WILL PAY $15,000.00 FOR INVESTIGATORY COSTS.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO MCL 451.2412(4)(I) OF THE MICHIGAN UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT, THE DIRECTOR OF THE CORPORATIONS, SECURITIES, AND COMMERCIAL LICENSING BUREAU ("BUREAU") WITHIN THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE STATE TREASURER, STATE OF MICHIGAN. FURTHERMORE, AS MICHIGAN SERVED AS A LEAD STATE IN THIS MATTER, EDWARD JONES WILL PAY $15,000.00 FOR INVESTIGATORY COSTS. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 7, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS, CORPORATIONS, SECURITIES, AND COMMERCIAL LICENSING BUREAU
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)

Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
05/01/2018
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
ENF-23-020101
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO MCL 451.2412(4)(I) OF THE MICHIGAN UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT, THE DIRECTOR OF THE CORPORATIONS, SECURITIES, AND
COMMERCIAL LICENSING BUREAU ("BUREAU") WITHIN THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS ALLEGED
THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY
DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN
BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE
ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/20/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE STATE TREASURER, STATE OF MICHIGAN. FURTHERMORE, AS
MICHIGAN SERVED AS A LEAD STATE IN THIS MATTER, EDWARD JONES WILL PAY $15,000.00 FOR INVESTIGATORY COSTS. SUCH PAYMENT WAS
MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 7, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE BUREAU FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-
DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF MCL
451.2412(4)(I) OF THE MICHIGAN UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE STATE
TREASURER, STATE OF MICHIGAN. FURTHERMORE, AS MICHIGAN SERVED AS A LEAD STATE IN THIS MATTER, EDWARD JONES WILL PAY $15,000.00 FOR
INVESTIGATORY COSTS.
regulatory · block 31PDF pages 105–106
Regulator name — filed text
STATE OF NEVADA OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE SECURITIES DIVISION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

STATE OF NEVADA OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE SECURITIES DIVISION FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF NRS 90.420(1)(L). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE NEVADA SECRETARY OF STATE. EDWARD JONES WILL ADDITIONALLY PAY $15,000.00 FOR INVESTIGATORY COSTS.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO NRS 90.420(1)(L), THE STATE OF NEVADA OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE SECURITIES DIVISION ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE NEVADA SECRETARY OF STATE. EDWARD JONES WILL ALSO PAY $15,000.00 FOR INVESTIGATORY COSTS. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 3, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
STATE OF NEVADA OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE SECURITIES DIVISION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
05/01/2018
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
INV23-171

5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO NRS 90.420(1)(L), THE STATE OF NEVADA OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE SECURITIES DIVISION ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE
PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT
TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS
HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/20/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE NEVADA SECRETARY OF STATE. EDWARD JONES WILL ALSO
PAY $15,000.00 FOR INVESTIGATORY COSTS. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 3, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
STATE OF NEVADA OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE SECURITIES DIVISION FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED
PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE
CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF NRS 90.420(1)(L). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72
PAYABLE TO THE NEVADA SECRETARY OF STATE. EDWARD JONES WILL ADDITIONALLY PAY $15,000.00 FOR INVESTIGATORY COSTS.
regulatory · block 32PDF pages 106–108
Regulator name — filed text
THE ALABAMA SECURITIES COMMISSION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE ALABAMA SECURITIES COMMISSION FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALERDURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF SECTION 8-6-3(J)(10) OF TITLE 8, CHAPTER 6, CODEOF ALABAMA. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY ANADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE ALABAMA SECURITIES COMMISSION.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO SECTION 8-6-3(J)(10) OF TITLE 8, CHAPTER 6, CODE OF ALABAMA, THE ALABAMA SECURITIES COMMISSION ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1,2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, (THE "INVESTIGATION PERIOD"), EDWARD JONES' PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHAREMUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIRINVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE ALABAMA SECURITIES COMMISSION. EDWARD JONES WILL ALSO PAY INVESTIGATORY COSTS OF$15,000 PAYABLE TO THE ALABAMA SECURITIES COMMISSION. SUCH PAYMENT WILL BE MADE ON OR ABOUT FEBRUARY 4, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File

with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
THE ALABAMA SECURITIES COMMISSION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
05/01/2018
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. CA-2024-0032
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO SECTION 8-6-3(J)(10) OF TITLE 8, CHAPTER 6, CODE OF ALABAMA, THE ALABAMA SECURITIES COMMISSION ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE
PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1,2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, (THE "INVESTIGATION PERIOD"), EDWARD JONES' PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY
DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHAREMUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN
BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIRINVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE
ASSETS.

8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/20/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE ALABAMA SECURITIES COMMISSION. EDWARD JONES WILL
ALSO PAY INVESTIGATORY COSTS OF$15,000 PAYABLE TO THE ALABAMA SECURITIES COMMISSION. SUCH PAYMENT WILL BE MADE ON OR ABOUT
FEBRUARY 4, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE ALABAMA SECURITIES COMMISSION FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS
ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALERDURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A
VIOLATION OF SECTION 8-6-3(J)(10) OF TITLE 8, CHAPTER 6, CODEOF ALABAMA. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY ANADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72
PAYABLE TO THE ALABAMA SECURITIES COMMISSION.
regulatory · block 33PDF pages 108–110
Regulator name — filed text
STATE OF CALIFORNIA - DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL PROTECTION AND INNOVATION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL PROTECTION AND INNOVATION FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF CORPORATIONS CODE SECTION 25218 AND CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 10, SECTION 260.218.4. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72, PAYABLE TO THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL PROTECTION AND INNOVATION.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO CORPORATIONS CODE SECTION 25218 AND CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 10, SECTION 260.218.4, THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA'S COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL PROTECTION AND INNOVATION ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL PROTECTION AND INNOVATION. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 3, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates

If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
STATE OF CALIFORNIA - DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL PROTECTION AND INNOVATION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/03/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
CRD NO. 250
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO CORPORATIONS CODE SECTION 25218 AND CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 10, SECTION 260.218.4, THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA'S
COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL PROTECTION AND INNOVATION ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1,
2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A
SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED
EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent

11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/20/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL PROTECTION AND
INNOVATION. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 3, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL PROTECTION AND INNOVATION FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY
DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED
THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF CORPORATIONS CODE SECTION 25218 AND CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 10,
SECTION 260.218.4. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER,
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72, PAYABLE TO THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL
PROTECTION AND INNOVATION.
regulatory · block 34PDF pages 110–112
Regulator name — filed text
THE COLORADO SECURITIES COMMISSION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE STATE OF COLORADO'S SECURITIES COMMISSIONER FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF §§ 11­51­606(2)(A) AND (B)(II), C.R.S. OF THE COLORADO SECURITIES ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE STATE OF COLORADO.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO §§ 11­51­410(1)(I), 11­51­606(2)(A) AND (B)(II), C.R.S. OF THE COLORADO SECURITIES ACT, THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER ­ STATE OF COLORADO ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE STATE OF COLORADO. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 7, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the

adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
THE COLORADO SECURITIES COMMISSION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/03/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
2023-CDS-019
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO §§ 11­51­410(1)(I), 11­51­606(2)(A) AND (B)(II), C.R.S. OF THE COLORADO SECURITIES ACT, THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER ­ STATE
OF COLORADO ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE
NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED
WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND
MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/20/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction

 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE STATE OF COLORADO. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT
JANUARY 7, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE STATE OF COLORADO'S SECURITIES COMMISSIONER FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH
RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED,
WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF §§ 11­51­606(2)(A) AND (B)(II), C.R.S. OF THE COLORADO SECURITIES ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING
THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE
MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE STATE OF COLORADO.
regulatory · block 35PDF pages 112–114
Regulator name — filed text
THE ARKANSAS SECURITIES COMMISSIONER
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE ARKANSAS SECURITIES COMMISSIONER FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF ARK. CODE ANN. § 23­42­301(F) AND RULE 301.01(C)(2). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE ARKANSAS SECURITIES DEPARTMENT. EDWARD JONES WILL ADDITIONALLY PAY $15,000.00 FOR INVESTIGATORY COSTS.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO ARK. CODE ANN. § 23­42­301(F) AND RULE 301.01(C)(2), THE ARKANSAS SECURITIES COMMISSIONER ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE ARKANSAS SECURITIES DEPARTMENT. EDWARD JONES WILL ALSO PAY INVESTIGATORY COSTS OF $15,000 PAYABLE TO THE ARKANSAS SECURITIES DEPARTMENT. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT DECEMBER 26, 2024.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No

NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
THE ARKANSAS SECURITIES COMMISSIONER
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
05/01/2018
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
CASE NO. S-23-0013/ ORDER NO. S-23-0013-23-OR01
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO ARK. CODE ANN. § 23­42­301(F) AND RULE 301.01(C)(2), THE ARKANSAS SECURITIES COMMISSIONER ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE
PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT
TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS
HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/23/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE ARKANSAS SECURITIES DEPARTMENT. EDWARD JONES WILL
ALSO PAY INVESTIGATORY COSTS OF $15,000 PAYABLE TO THE ARKANSAS SECURITIES DEPARTMENT. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT
DECEMBER 26, 2024.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response

must fit within the space provided).
THE ARKANSAS SECURITIES COMMISSIONER FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS
ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A
VIOLATION OF ARK. CODE ANN. § 23­42­301(F) AND RULE 301.01(C)(2). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS
OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE
ARKANSAS SECURITIES DEPARTMENT. EDWARD JONES WILL ADDITIONALLY PAY $15,000.00 FOR INVESTIGATORY COSTS.
regulatory · block 36PDF pages 114–115
Regulator name — filed text
THE COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES AND INSURANCE, OFFICE OF THE MONTANA STATE AUDITOR
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES AND INSURANCE, OFFICE OF THE MONTANA STATE AUDITOR FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF MONT. CODE ANN. § 30­10­201(13)(K). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE STATE OF MONTANA. EDWARD JONES WILL ADDITIONALLY PAY $15,000.00 FOR INVESTIGATORY COSTS.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO MONT. CODE ANN. § 30­10­201(13)(K), THE COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES AND INSURANCE, OFFICE OF THE MONTANA STATE AUDITOR, ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE STATE OF MONTANA. EDWARD JONES WILL ALSO PAY $15,000.00 FOR INVESTIGATORY COSTS. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 7, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
THE COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES AND INSURANCE, OFFICE OF THE MONTANA STATE AUDITOR
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 

3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
05/01/2018
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
SEC-2023-00223
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO MONT. CODE ANN. § 30­10­201(13)(K), THE COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES AND INSURANCE, OFFICE OF THE MONTANA STATE AUDITOR,
ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY
DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN
BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE
ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/20/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE STATE OF MONTANA. EDWARD JONES WILL ALSO PAY
$15,000.00 FOR INVESTIGATORY COSTS. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 7, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES AND INSURANCE, OFFICE OF THE MONTANA STATE AUDITOR FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE
REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD
HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF MONT. CODE ANN. § 30­10­201(13)(K). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR
DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE
MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE STATE OF MONTANA. EDWARD JONES WILL ADDITIONALLY PAY $15,000.00 FOR INVESTIGATORY
COSTS.
regulatory · block 37PDF pages 115–117
Regulator name — filed text
STATE OF WYOMING, COMPLIANCE DIVISION OF THE WYOMING SECRETARY OF STATE
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE WYOMING SECRETARY OF STATE FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION OF W.S. 17-4-412(D)(IX) OF THE ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE WYOMING SECRETARY OF STATE.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO W.S. 17-4-412(D)(IX) OF THE WYOMING UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT ("THE ACT"), THE WYOMING SECRETARY OF STATE ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE WYOMING SECRETARY OF STATE. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 7, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,

11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
STATE OF WYOMING, COMPLIANCE DIVISION OF THE WYOMING SECRETARY OF STATE
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/03/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
MATTER NO. 2023-02
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):

6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO W.S. 17-4-412(D)(IX) OF THE WYOMING UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT ("THE ACT"), THE WYOMING SECRETARY OF STATE ALLEGED THAT,
DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED
WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE
CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/23/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE WYOMING SECRETARY OF STATE. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR
ABOUT JANUARY 7, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE WYOMING SECRETARY OF STATE FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS
ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED
AS A VIOLATION OF W.S. 17-4-412(D)(IX) OF THE ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET
FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE WYOMING SECRETARY
OF STATE.
regulatory · block 38PDF pages 117–119
Regulator name — filed text
LOUISIANA OFFICE OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE LOUISIANA OFFICE OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF 51:704(A)(9) OF THE LOUISIANA SECURITIESLAW. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVEMONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE STATE OF LOUISIANA OFFICE OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO 51:704(A)(9) OF THE LOUISIANA SECURITIES LAW (LSL), THE LOUISIANA OFFICE OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELYJULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, (THE "INVESTIGATION PERIOD"), EDWARD JONES' PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS ASHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIRINVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE STATE OF LOUISIANA OFFICE OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS. SUCH PAYMENT WILL BE MADE ON OR ABOUTFEBRUARY 4, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 

One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
LOUISIANA OFFICE OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/03/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
OFI-2023-03
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO 51:704(A)(9) OF THE LOUISIANA SECURITIES LAW (LSL), THE LOUISIANA OFFICE OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ALLEGED THAT, DURING
THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELYJULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, (THE "INVESTIGATION PERIOD"), EDWARD JONES' PROCEDURES WERE NOT
REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS ASHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN
CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIRINVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE
THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final

9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/20/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE STATE OF LOUISIANA OFFICE OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS. SUCH
PAYMENT WILL BE MADE ON OR ABOUTFEBRUARY 4, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE LOUISIANA OFFICE OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH
RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED,
WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF 51:704(A)(9) OF THE LOUISIANA SECURITIESLAW. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT
OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVEMONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72
PAYABLE TO THE STATE OF LOUISIANA OFFICE OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS.
regulatory · block 39PDF pages 119–121
Regulator name — filed text
KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS ABROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF 808 KAR 10:030, §4(1) OF THEKENTUCKY REVISED STATUTES. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TOPAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE KENTUCKY STATE TREASURER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 808 KAR 10:030, SECTION 4(1) OF THE KENTUCKY REVISED STATUTES, THE KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ALLEGED THAT, DURING THEPERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, (THE "INVESTIGATION PERIOD"), EDWARD JONES' PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THESALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARDJONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE KENTUCKY STATE TREASURER. SUCH PAYMENT WILL BE MADE ON OR ABOUT FEBRUARY 4, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.

ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/03/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
2023-AH-0022
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 808 KAR 10:030, SECTION 4(1) OF THE KENTUCKY REVISED STATUTES, THE KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL
INSTITUTIONS ALLEGED THAT, DURING THEPERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, (THE "INVESTIGATION PERIOD"), EDWARD
JONES' PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THESALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE
FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARDJONES TO SERVE AS THEIR
INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/27/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:

p
p
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE KENTUCKY STATE TREASURER. SUCH PAYMENT WILL BE MADE ON OR
ABOUT FEBRUARY 4, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH
RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS ABROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH
CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF 808 KAR 10:030, §4(1) OF THEKENTUCKY REVISED STATUTES. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF
FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TOPAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF
$320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE KENTUCKY STATE TREASURER.
regulatory · block 40PDF pages 121–123
Regulator name — filed text
STATE OF NEW MEXICO REGULATION AND LICENSING DEPARTMENT SECURITIES DIVISION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE DIVISION FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER- DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATIONPERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION OF 12.11.4.10 NMAC OF THE NEW MEXICO SECURITIES LAW. WITHOUT ADMITTINGOR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF$320,754.72 TO THE DIVISION.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO 12.11.4.10 NMAC, THE SECURITIES DIVISION OF THE NEW MEXICO REGULATION AND LICENSING DEPARTMENT (THE "DIVISION") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OFAPPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, (THE "INVESTIGATION PERIOD"), EDWARD JONES' PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OFCERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TOSERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE DIVISION. SUCH PAYMENT WILL BE MADE ON OR ABOUT FEBRUARY 4, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.

This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
STATE OF NEW MEXICO REGULATION AND LICENSING DEPARTMENT SECURITIES DIVISION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/03/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
CASE NO. MS-23-7-10
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO 12.11.4.10 NMAC, THE SECURITIES DIVISION OF THE NEW MEXICO REGULATION AND LICENSING DEPARTMENT (THE "DIVISION")
ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OFAPPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, (THE "INVESTIGATION PERIOD"), EDWARD JONES'
PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OFCERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE
OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TOSERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT
ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/20/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to

requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE DIVISION. SUCH PAYMENT WILL BE MADE ON OR ABOUT FEBRUARY 4,
2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE DIVISION FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-
DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATIONPERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION OF
12.11.4.10 NMAC OF THE NEW MEXICO SECURITIES LAW. WITHOUT ADMITTINGOR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET
FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF$320,754.72 TO THE DIVISION.
regulatory · block 41PDF pages 123–124
Regulator name — filed text
THE NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF NEBRASKA, NEB. REV. STAT SECTION 8-1103(9)(A)(XI). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO SECURITIES ACT OF NEBRASKA, NEB. REV. STAT SECTION 8-1103(9)(A)(XI) OF THE ACT, THE NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 9, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:

SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
THE NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/03/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
CRD #250
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO SECURITIES ACT OF NEBRASKA, NEB. REV. STAT SECTION 8-1103(9)(A)(XI) OF THE ACT, THE NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND
FINANCE ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT
REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN
CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE
THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/20/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE. SUCH
PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 9, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH
RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED,
WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF NEBRASKA, NEB. REV. STAT SECTION 8-1103(9)(A)(XI). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR
DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE
MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE.
regulatory · block 42PDF pages 125–126
Regulator name — filed text
THE FLORIDA OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE FLORIDA OFFICE FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF SECTIONS 20.121(3)(A)(2) OF THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE STATE OF FLORIDA.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 20.121(3)(A)(2) OF THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, THE FLORIDA OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION ("OFFICE") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION. EDWARD JONES WILL ALSO PAY $15,000.00 FOR INVESTIGATORY COSTS. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 14, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
THE FLORIDA OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
05/01/2018
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:

4.
Docket/Case Number:
116856-S
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 20.121(3)(A)(2) OF THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, THE FLORIDA OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION ("OFFICE")
ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY
DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN
BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE
ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
01/07/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION.
EDWARD JONES WILL ALSO PAY $15,000.00 FOR INVESTIGATORY COSTS. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 14, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE FLORIDA OFFICE FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A
BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF
SECTIONS 20.121(3)(A)(2) OF THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF
LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE
STATE OF FLORIDA.
regulatory · block 43Vickers, Gregory, ChadPDF pages 126–128
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
Vickers, Gregory, Chad
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)

11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
6706470
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
Vickers, Gregory, Chad
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other Product Types: 

7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 44PDF pages 128–130
Regulator name — filed text
THE MAINE OFFICE OF SECURITIES
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE MAINE SECURITIES ADMINISTRATOR FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF 504 § 7(1) OF THE MAINE OFFICE OF SECURITIES RULE. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE TREASURER, STATE OF MAINE.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO THE MAINE OFFICE OF SECURITIES RULE CHAPTER 504 § 7(1), THE MAINE SECURITIES ADMINISTRATOR ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE TREASURER, STATE OF MAINE. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 16, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE

No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
THE MAINE OFFICE OF SECURITIES
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/03/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
NO. 2023-29
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO THE MAINE OFFICE OF SECURITIES RULE CHAPTER 504 § 7(1), THE MAINE SECURITIES ADMINISTRATOR ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE
PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT
TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS
HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/20/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:

A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE TREASURER, STATE OF MAINE. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR
ABOUT JANUARY 16, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE MAINE SECURITIES ADMINISTRATOR FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS
ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A
VIOLATION OF 504 § 7(1) OF THE MAINE OFFICE OF SECURITIES RULE. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS
OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE
TREASURER, STATE OF MAINE.
regulatory · block 45PDF pages 130–132
Regulator name — filed text
STATE OF NEW JERSEY BUREAU OF SECURITIES
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.75
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE BUREAU FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER- DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION OF N.J.S.A. 49:3-58(A)(2)(XI) OF THE NEW JERSEY SECURITIES LAW. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 AND $15,000 IN INVESTIGATORY COSTS TO THE GENERAL TREASURY OF NEW JERSEY.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO N.J.S.A. 49:3-58(A)(2)(XI), THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY BUREAU OF SECURITIES (THE "BUREAU") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PLUS $15,000 IN INVESTIGATORY COSTS TO THE GENERAL TREASURY OF NEW JERSEY. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 14, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 

B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
STATE OF NEW JERSEY BUREAU OF SECURITIES
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
05/01/2018
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
CRD #250
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO N.J.S.A. 49:3-58(A)(2)(XI), THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY BUREAU OF SECURITIES (THE "BUREAU") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF
APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE
OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE
SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
01/08/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.75
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PLUS $15,000 IN INVESTIGATORY COSTS TO THE GENERAL TREASURY OF

NEW JERSEY. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 14, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE BUREAU FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-
DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION OF
N.J.S.A. 49:3-58(A)(2)(XI) OF THE NEW JERSEY SECURITIES LAW. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF
LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 AND $15,000 IN
INVESTIGATORY COSTS TO THE GENERAL TREASURY OF NEW JERSEY.
regulatory · block 46PDF pages 132–133
Regulator name — filed text
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE SECURITIES DIVISION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE ADMINISTRATOR FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION OF N.C. GEN. STAT. §78A­39(A1). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE FINAL ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.00 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA SECRETARY OF STATE.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO N.C. GEN. STAT. §78A­39(A1), THE NORTH CAROLINA SECRETARY OF STATE AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE NORTH CAROLINA SECURITIES ACT (THE "ADMINISTRATOR") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA SECRETARY OF STATE. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 16, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE SECURITIES DIVISION

2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/03/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
FILE NO. 22SEC113
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO N.C. GEN. STAT. §78A­39(A1), THE NORTH CAROLINA SECRETARY OF STATE AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE NORTH CAROLINA SECURITIES
ACT (THE "ADMINISTRATOR") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S
PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE
OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT
ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
01/02/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA SECRETARY OF STATE. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON
OR ABOUT JANUARY 16, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE ADMINISTRATOR FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A
BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION
OF N.C. GEN. STAT. §78A­39(A1). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE FINAL
ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.00 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA SECRETARY OF STATE.
regulatory · block 47PDF pages 133–135
Regulator name — filed text
STATE OF TENNESSEE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCE AND INSURANCE
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE COMMISSIONER FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION OF TENN. CODE ANN. § 48­1­112(A)(2)(J). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INSURANCE.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO TENN. CODE ANN. § 48­1­112(A)(2)(J), THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCE AND INSURANCE FOR THE STATE OF TENNESSEE ("COMMISSIONER") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INSURANCE. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 16, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
STATE OF TENNESSEE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCE AND INSURANCE
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/03/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
MATTER NO.: 23-01039
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):

y
p
y
g
y
g
y
(
pp
)
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO TENN. CODE ANN. § 48­1­112(A)(2)(J), THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCE AND INSURANCE FOR THE STATE OF TENNESSEE
("COMMISSIONER") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES
WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS
PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER
AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/27/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INSURANCE. SUCH
PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 16, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE COMMISSIONER FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A
BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION
OF TENN. CODE ANN. § 48­1­112(A)(2)(J). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE
CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF
COMMERCE AND INSURANCE.
regulatory · block 48PDF pages 135–137
Regulator name — filed text
SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF SECTION 412(A)(10)OF THE MARYLAND SECURITIES ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE STATE OF MARYLAND, MARYLAND OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO SECTION 11-412(A)(10) OF THE MARYLAND SECURITIES ACT, THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE STATE OF MARYLAND, MARYLAND OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT DECEMBER 26, 2024.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File

with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/03/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
SECURITIES DOCKET NO. 2023-0261
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO SECTION 11-412(A)(10) OF THE MARYLAND SECURITIES ACT, THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND ALLEGED THAT, DURING
THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH
RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS
HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/20/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE STATE OF MARYLAND, MARYLAND OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT DECEMBER 26, 2024.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO
ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH
CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF SECTION 412(A)(10)OF THE MARYLAND SECURITIES ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72
PAYABLE TO THE STATE OF MARYLAND, MARYLAND OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.
regulatory · block 49PDF pages 137–139
Regulator name — filed text
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH SECURITIES DIVISION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH SECURITIES DIVISION FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF MASS. GEN. LAWS C. 110A, § 204(A)(2)(J). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SECRETARY OF STATE.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO MASS. GEN. LAWS C. 110A, § 204(A)(2)(J), THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH SECURITIES DIVISION ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER- DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SECRETARY OF STATE. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 9, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 

If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH SECURITIES DIVISION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
05/01/2018
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
E-2018-0048
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO MASS. GEN. LAWS C. 110A, § 204(A)(2)(J), THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE
COMMONWEALTH SECURITIES DIVISION ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-
DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE
FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR
INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/24/2024
 Exact
 Explanation

p
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SECRETARY OF
STATE. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 9, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH SECURITIES DIVISION FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES
DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD
THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF MASS. GEN. LAWS C. 110A, § 204(A)(2)(J). WITHOUT
ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN
ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SECRETARY OF STATE.
regulatory · block 50PDF pages 139–141
Regulator name — filed text
SECURITIES DIVISION OF THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE SECURITIES DIVISION FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION OF RCW 21.20.110(1)(J) OF THE ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE SECURITIES DIVISION, PLUS AN ADDITIONAL $15,000 TO COVER INVESTIGATORY COSTS INCURRED BY THE SECURITIES DIVISION WHILE SERVING AS A LEAD STATE IN THIS MATTER SPANNING MULTIPLE STATES.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO RCW 21.20.110(1)(J) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF WASHINGTON (THE "ACT"), THE SECURITIES DIVISION OF THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS (THE "SECURITIES DIVISION") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE SECURITIES DIVISION. EDWARD JONES WILL ALSO PAY INVESTIGATORY COSTS OF $15,000. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 7, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any

event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
SECURITIES DIVISION OF THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
05/01/2018
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
ORDER NO. S-19-2768-23-CO01
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO RCW 21.20.110(1)(J) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF WASHINGTON (THE "ACT"), THE SECURITIES DIVISION OF THE WASHINGTON STATE
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS (THE "SECURITIES DIVISION") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO
JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE
MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD
JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/20/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:

Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE SECURITIES DIVISION. EDWARD JONES WILL ALSO PAY
INVESTIGATORY COSTS OF $15,000. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 7, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE SECURITIES DIVISION FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A
BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION
OF RCW 21.20.110(1)(J) OF THE ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE
CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE SECURITIES DIVISION, PLUS AN
ADDITIONAL $15,000 TO COVER INVESTIGATORY COSTS INCURRED BY THE SECURITIES DIVISION WHILE SERVING AS A LEAD STATE IN THIS MATTER
SPANNING MULTIPLE STATES.
regulatory · block 51PDF pages 141–143
Regulator name — filed text
KANSAS SECURITIES COMMISSION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF THE STATE OF KANSAS FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF KANSAS UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT SECTION 17-12A412(C). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS ( ) OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE KANSAS INSURANCE DEPARTMENT.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO KANSAS UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT SECTION 17-12A412(C), THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF THE STATE OF KANSAS ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE STATE OF KANSAS' INSURANCE DEPARTMENT. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 7, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.

PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
KANSAS SECURITIES COMMISSION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/03/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
DOCKET NO. 24 E 016 / KSC NO. 2024-6907
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO KANSAS UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT SECTION 17-12A412(C), THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF THE STATE OF KANSAS ALLEGED THAT,
DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED
WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE
CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/20/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE STATE OF KANSAS' INSURANCE DEPARTMENT. SUCH PAYMENT WAS
MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 7, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF THE STATE OF KANSAS FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH
RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED,
WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF KANSAS UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT SECTION 17-12A412(C). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS

( )
OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF
$320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE KANSAS INSURANCE DEPARTMENT.
regulatory · block 52PDF pages 143–144
Regulator name — filed text
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, SECURITIES AND BANKING
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE DEPARTMENT FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER- DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION OF D.C. OFFICIAL CODE § 31­5602.07 (A)(12) OF THE D.C. SECURITIES ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE D.C. TREASURER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO D.C. OFFICIAL CODE § 31­5602.07 (A)(12) OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SECURITIES ACT OF 2000 ("THE D.C. SECURITIES ACT"), THE COMMISSIONER OF THE D.C. DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, SECURITIES AND BANKING ("THE DEPARTMENT") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE D.C. TREASURER. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 8, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, SECURITIES AND BANKING
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/03/2023
 Exact
 Explanation

If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
ORDER NO: SB-CO-04-23
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO D.C. OFFICIAL CODE § 31­5602.07 (A)(12) OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SECURITIES ACT OF 2000 ("THE D.C. SECURITIES ACT"), THE
COMMISSIONER OF THE D.C. DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, SECURITIES AND BANKING ("THE DEPARTMENT") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF
APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE
OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE
SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/30/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE D.C. TREASURER. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY
8, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE DEPARTMENT FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-
DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION OF D.C.
OFFICIAL CODE § 31­5602.07 (A)(12) OF THE D.C. SECURITIES ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF
LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE D.C.
TREASURER.
regulatory · block 53PDF pages 144–146
Regulator name — filed text
WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, DIVISION OF SECURITIES
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE DIVISION FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER- DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION OF WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DFI­SEC. 4.05(2) OF THE ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 AND $15,000.00 IN INVESTIGATORY COSTS TO THE STATE OF WISCONSIN.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DFI­SEC. 4.05(2) OF THE WISCONSIN UNIFORM SECURITIES LAW, CHAPTER 551 ("THE ACT"), THE WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, DIVISION OF SECURITIES (THE "DIVISION") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 AND $15,000.00 IN INVESTIGATORY COSTS TO THE STATE OF WISCONSIN. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 6, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)

11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, DIVISION OF SECURITIES
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
05/01/2018
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
DFI CASE NO. S-248377 (LX)
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 

7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DFI­SEC. 4.05(2) OF THE WISCONSIN UNIFORM SECURITIES LAW, CHAPTER 551 ("THE ACT"), THE WISCONSIN
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, DIVISION OF SECURITIES (THE "DIVISION") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY
1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A
SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED
EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/30/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 AND $15,000.00 IN INVESTIGATORY COSTS TO THE STATE OF WISCONSIN.
SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 6, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE DIVISION FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-
DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION OF WIS.
ADMIN. CODE § DFI­SEC. 4.05(2) OF THE ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN
THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 AND $15,000.00 IN INVESTIGATORY
COSTS TO THE STATE OF WISCONSIN.
regulatory · block 54PDF pages 146–148
Regulator name — filed text
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK INVESTOR PROTECTION BUREAU
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE BUREAU FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER- DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION OF EXECUTIVE LAW SECTION 63(15). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE BUREAU.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO EXECUTIVE LAW SECTION 63(15), THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK INVESTOR PROTECTION BUREAU ("BUREAU") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE BUREAU. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT DECEMBER 30, 2024.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I

A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK INVESTOR PROTECTION BUREAU
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/03/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
NO. 24-097
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO EXECUTIVE LAW SECTION 63(15), THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK INVESTOR PROTECTION BUREAU ("BUREAU")
ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY
DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN
BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE
ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:

If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/20/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE BUREAU. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT DECEMBER 30,
2024.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE BUREAU FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-
DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION OF
EXECUTIVE LAW SECTION 63(15). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT
ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE BUREAU.
regulatory · block 55PDF pages 148–150
Regulator name — filed text
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA SECURITIES DEPARTMENT
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION OF N.D.C.C. § 10­04­11(1)(M) OF THE NORTH DAKOTA SECURITIES ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE NORTH DAKOTA SECURITIES DEPARTMENT.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO N.D.C.C. § 10­04­11(1)(M), THE NORTH DAKOTA SECURITIES COMMISSIONER, AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE SECURITIES ACT (THE "SECURITIES COMMISSIONER"), ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE NORTH DAKOTA SECURITIES DEPARTMENT. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 10, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed

This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA SECURITIES DEPARTMENT
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/03/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
CRD #250
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO N.D.C.C. § 10­04­11(1)(M), THE NORTH DAKOTA SECURITIES COMMISSIONER, AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE SECURITIES ACT (THE
"SECURITIES COMMISSIONER"), ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S
PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE
OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT
ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/20/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?

 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE NORTH DAKOTA SECURITIES DEPARTMENT. SUCH PAYMENT WAS
MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 10, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES
AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A
VIOLATION OF N.D.C.C. § 10­04­11(1)(M) OF THE NORTH DAKOTA SECURITIES ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO
THE NORTH DAKOTA SECURITIES DEPARTMENT.
regulatory · block 56PDF pages 150–152
Regulator name — filed text
STATE OF UTAH DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE DIVISION OF SECURITIES
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE DIVISION FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER- DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION OF § 61­ 1-6(2)(A)(II)(J) OF THE ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THEFINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THEDIVISION.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO § 61­1­6(2)(A)(II)(J) OF THE UTAH UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT ("ACT"), THE UTAH DIVISION OF SECURITIES ("DIVISION") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OFAPPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, (THE "INVESTIGATION PERIOD"), EDWARD JONES' PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OFCERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TOSERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE DIVISION. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 27, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 

B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
STATE OF UTAH DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE DIVISION OF SECURITIES
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/03/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
DOCKET NO.: SD-23-0031
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO § 61­1­6(2)(A)(II)(J) OF THE UTAH UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT ("ACT"), THE UTAH DIVISION OF SECURITIES ("DIVISION") ALLEGED THAT,
DURING THE PERIOD OFAPPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, (THE "INVESTIGATION PERIOD"), EDWARD JONES' PROCEDURES WERE NOT
REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OFCERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN
CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TOSERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE
THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
01/16/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE DIVISION. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 27,

2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE DIVISION FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-
DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION OF § 61­
1-6(2)(A)(II)(J) OF THE ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THEFINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT
ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THEDIVISION.
regulatory · block 57PDF pages 152–153
Regulator name — filed text
TEXAS STATE SECURITIES BOARD
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE COMMISSIONER FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION OF § 115.10(A)(1) OF THE BOARD RULES. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72, PLUS AN ADDITIONAL $15,000 FOR TEXAS SERVING AS THE LEAD STATE IN THIS MATTER THAT HAS SPANNED MULTIPLE STATES, TO THE STATE OF TEXAS.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO § 115.10(A)(1) OF 7 TEX. ADMIN. CODE §§101.1­139.27 (2022) (TEX. STATE SEC. BD.) (THE "BOARD RULES"), THE TEXAS SECURITIES COMMISSIONER (THE "COMMISSIONER") AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE TEXAS SECURITIES ACT ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE STATE OF TEXAS. EDWARD JONES WILL ALSO PAY INVESTIGATORY COSTS OF $15,000. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 10, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
TEXAS STATE SECURITIES BOARD

2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
05/01/2018
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
ORDER NO. IC-25-CAF-01
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO § 115.10(A)(1) OF 7 TEX. ADMIN. CODE §§101.1­139.27 (2022) (TEX. STATE SEC. BD.) (THE "BOARD RULES"), THE TEXAS SECURITIES
COMMISSIONER (THE "COMMISSIONER") AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE TEXAS SECURITIES ACT ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY
JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN
CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES
ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/20/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE STATE OF TEXAS. EDWARD JONES WILL ALSO PAY INVESTIGATORY
COSTS OF $15,000. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 10, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE COMMISSIONER FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A
BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION
OF § 115.10(A)(1) OF THE BOARD RULES. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE
CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72, PLUS AN ADDITIONAL $15,000 FOR TEXAS
SERVING AS THE LEAD STATE IN THIS MATTER THAT HAS SPANNED MULTIPLE STATES, TO THE STATE OF TEXAS.
regulatory · block 58PDF pages 153–155
Regulator name — filed text
U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF BANKING, INSURANCE, AND FINANCIAL REGULATION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE ADMINISTRATOR FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION OF TITLE 9 CH. 23 § 642(D)(9) OF THE VIC. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE GOVERNMENT OF THE U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO TITLE 9 CH. 23 § 642(D)(9) OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS CODE ("VIC"), THE SECURITIES ADMINISTRATOR (THE "ADMINISTRATOR") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE GOVERNMENT OF THE U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 10, 2024.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF BANKING, INSURANCE, AND FINANCIAL REGULATION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/03/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
DOCKET NO.: 2023-003
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):

y
p
y
g
y
g
y
(
pp
)
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO TITLE 9 CH. 23 § 642(D)(9) OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS CODE ("VIC"), THE SECURITIES ADMINISTRATOR (THE "ADMINISTRATOR") ALLEGED
THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY
DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN
BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE
ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/20/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE GOVERNMENT OF THE U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS. SUCH PAYMENT WAS
MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 10, 2024.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE ADMINISTRATOR FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A
BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION
OF TITLE 9 CH. 23 § 642(D)(9) OF THE VIC. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE
CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE GOVERNMENT OF THE U.S. VIRGIN
ISLANDS.
regulatory · block 59PDF pages 155–157
Regulator name — filed text
STATE OF OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF SECURITIES
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE ADMINISTRATOR FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION OF RULE 660:11-5-42(B)(22)(A) OF THE ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE OKLAHOMA STATE TREASURER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO RULE 660:11-5-42(B)(22)(A)OF THE OKLAHOMA UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT OF 2004 (THE "ACT"), THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF SECURITIES (THE "ADMINISTRATOR") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE OKLAHOMA STATE TREASURER. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 9, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File

with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
STATE OF OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF SECURITIES
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/03/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
ODS FILE 24-001
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO RULE 660:11-5-42(B)(22)(A)OF THE OKLAHOMA UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT OF 2004 (THE "ACT"), THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF SECURITIES (THE "ADMINISTRATOR") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3,
2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL
FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO
SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/20/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE OKLAHOMA STATE TREASURER. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR
ABOUT JANUARY 9, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE ADMINISTRATOR FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A
BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION
OF RULE 660:11-5-42(B)(22)(A) OF THE ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE
CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE OKLAHOMA STATE TREASURER.
regulatory · block 60PDF pages 157–159
Regulator name — filed text
THE ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF A.R.S. §§ 44­1961(A)(12) AND (B)(1) AND 44­2036. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE STATE OF ARIZONA.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO A.R.S. §§ 44­1961(A)(12) AND (B)(1) AND 44­2036, THE STATE OF ARIZONA'S CORPORATION COMMISSION ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE STATE OF ARIZONA. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT FEBRUARY 14, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 

If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
THE ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/03/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
S-21347A-25-0005
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO A.R.S. §§ 44­1961(A)(12) AND (B)(1) AND 44­2036, THE STATE OF ARIZONA'S CORPORATION COMMISSION ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE
PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT
TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS
HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
02/19/2025
 Exact
 Explanation

If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE STATE OF ARIZONA. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT
FEBRUARY 14, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS
ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A
VIOLATION OF A.R.S. §§ 44­1961(A)(12) AND (B)(1) AND 44­2036. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF
LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE STATE OF
ARIZONA.
regulatory · block 61PDF pages 159–161
Regulator name — filed text
THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCE
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF MINN. STAT. § 80A.67(D)(9) OF THE MINNESOTA SECURITIES ACT AND MINN. STAT. § 45.027 SUBD. 6 AND 7. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO MINN. STAT. § 80A.67(D)(9) OF THE MINNESOTA SECURITIES ACT AND MINN. STAT. § 45.027 SUBD. 6 AND 7, THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCE ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any

event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCE
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/03/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
82356
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO MINN. STAT. § 80A.67(D)(9) OF THE MINNESOTA SECURITIES ACT AND MINN. STAT. § 45.027 SUBD. 6 AND 7, THE STATE OF MINNESOTA,
COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCE ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S
PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE
OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT
ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/27/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:

Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH
RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED,
WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF MINN. STAT. § 80A.67(D)(9) OF THE MINNESOTA SECURITIES ACT AND MINN. STAT. § 45.027 SUBD. 6 AND 7.
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO
PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
regulatory · block 62PDF pages 161–163
Regulator name — filed text
OFFICE OF THE MISSISSIPPI SECRETARY OF STATE SECURITIES DIVISION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE OFFICE OF THE MISSISSIPPI SECRETARY OF STATE, SECURITIES DIVISION, FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF 1 MISSISSIPPI ADMIN CODE PT. 14, R. 5.19. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE MISSISSIPPI SECRETARY OF STATE'S OFFICE.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO 1 MISSISSIPPI ADMIN CODE PT. 14, R. 5.19 OF THE MISSISSIPPI SECURITIES ACT, THE OFFICE OF THE MISSISSIPPI SECRETARY OF STATE, SECURITIES DIVISION, ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE MISSISSIPPI SECRETARY OF STATE'S OFFICE. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 16, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II

1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
OFFICE OF THE MISSISSIPPI SECRETARY OF STATE SECURITIES DIVISION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/03/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
LS-23-6227
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO 1 MISSISSIPPI ADMIN CODE PT. 14, R. 5.19 OF THE MISSISSIPPI SECURITIES ACT, THE OFFICE OF THE MISSISSIPPI SECRETARY OF
STATE, SECURITIES DIVISION, ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S
PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE
OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT
ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/20/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE MISSISSIPPI SECRETARY OF STATE'S OFFICE. SUCH
PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 16, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE OFFICE OF THE MISSISSIPPI SECRETARY OF STATE, SECURITIES DIVISION, FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED
PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE
CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF 1 MISSISSIPPI ADMIN CODE PT. 14, R. 5.19. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE
FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY

FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE MISSISSIPPI SECRETARY OF STATE'S OFFICE.
regulatory · block 63PDF pages 163–164
Regulator name — filed text
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BUREAU OF SECURITIES REGULATION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE BUREAU FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER- DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION OF NH RSA 421-B:4-401(F)(3)(B) OF THE NEW HAMPSHIRE UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO NH RSA 421-B:4-401(F)(3)(B), THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BUREAU OF SECURITIES REGULATION (THE "BUREAU") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 16, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BUREAU OF SECURITIES REGULATION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/03/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:

4.
Docket/Case Number:
I-2023-000027
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO NH RSA 421-B:4-401(F)(3)(B), THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BUREAU OF SECURITIES REGULATION (THE "BUREAU") ALLEGED THAT,
DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED
WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE
CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/24/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR
ABOUT JANUARY 16, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE BUREAU FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-
DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION OF NH
RSA 421-B:4-401(F)(3)(B) OF THE NEW HAMPSHIRE UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE.
regulatory · block 64PDF pages 164–166
Regulator name — filed text
STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION OF FINANCIAL REGULATION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE DIRECTOR FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER- DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION OF OAR 660:11-5-42(B)(22)(A). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER & BUSINESS SERVICES.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO OREGON ADMINISTRATIVE RULE ("OAR") 660:11-5-42(B)(22)(A), THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND BUSINESS SERVICES ("DIRECTOR") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER & BUSINESS SERVICES. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT DECEMBER 30, 2024.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)

11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION OF FINANCIAL REGULATION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/03/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
CASE NO. S-23-0046
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO OREGON ADMINISTRATIVE RULE ("OAR") 660:11-5-42(B)(22)(A), THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND BUSINESS

SERVICES ("DIRECTOR") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES
WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS
PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER
AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/26/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER & BUSINESS SERVICES. SUCH
PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT DECEMBER 30, 2024.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE DIRECTOR FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-
DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION OF OAR
660:11-5-42(B)(22)(A). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER,
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER & BUSINESS
SERVICES.
regulatory · block 65PDF pages 166–168
Regulator name — filed text
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND SECURITIES
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE DEPARTMENT FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER- DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION OF 10 PA. CODE § 305.011 (A). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND SECURITIES.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO 10 PA. CODE § 305.011 (A), THE DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND SECURITIES ("DEPARTMENT") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND SECURITIES. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 10, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)

You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND SECURITIES
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/03/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
DOCKET NO. 240047 (SEC-CAO)
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO 10 PA. CODE § 305.011 (A), THE DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND SECURITIES ("DEPARTMENT") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF
APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE
OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE
SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:

Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/20/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND SECURITIES. SUCH PAYMENT WAS
MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 10, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE DEPARTMENT FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-
DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION OF 10 PA.
CODE § 305.011 (A). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER,
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND SECURITIES.
regulatory · block 66PDF pages 168–170
Regulator name — filed text
COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE COMMISSIONER FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 204(A)(2)(J) OF PRUSA AND REGULATION 6078. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 204(A)(2)(J) OF PUERTO RICO UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT ("PRUSA") AND ARTICLE 28 OF REGULATION NO. 6078 OF JANUARY 19, 2000, AS AMENDED, KNOWN AS "REGULATION UNDER THE UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT" ("REGULATION 6078"), THE OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ACT (THE "COMMISSIONER") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 10, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the

adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/03/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
CRD #250
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 204(A)(2)(J) OF PUERTO RICO UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT ("PRUSA") AND ARTICLE 28 OF REGULATION NO. 6078 OF JANUARY 19,
2000, AS AMENDED, KNOWN AS "REGULATION UNDER THE UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT" ("REGULATION 6078"), THE OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ACT (THE "COMMISSIONER") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE
BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS
RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE
AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/20/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution

 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO
RICO. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 10, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE COMMISSIONER FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A
BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION
OF ARTICLE 204(A)(2)(J) OF PRUSA AND REGULATION 6078. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET
FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE DEPARTMENT OF
TREASURY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO.
regulatory · block 67PDF pages 170–172
Regulator name — filed text
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION SECURITIES DIVISION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE DIRECTOR FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER- DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION OF R.I. GEN. LAWS § 7­11­212(B)(11). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE GENERAL FUND OF THE STATE OF RHODE ISLAND.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO R.I. GEN. LAWS § 7­11­212(B)(11), THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION ("DIRECTOR") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE GENERAL FUND OF THE STATE OF RHODE ISLAND. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 7, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.

 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION SECURITIES DIVISION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/03/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
DBR NO. 2023-SC-003
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO R.I. GEN. LAWS § 7­11­212(B)(11), THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION ("DIRECTOR") ALLEGED THAT,
DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED
WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE
CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/20/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE GENERAL FUND OF THE STATE OF RHODE ISLAND. SUCH PAYMENT
WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 7, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response

must fit within the space provided).
THE DIRECTOR FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-
DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION OF R.I.
GEN. LAWS § 7­11­212(B)(11). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT
ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE GENERAL FUND OF THE STATE OF RHODE
ISLAND.
regulatory · block 68PDF pages 172–173
Regulator name — filed text
THE INDIANA OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE SECURITIES DIVISION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE INDIANA SECURITIES DIVISION FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF 710 I.A.C. SECTION 4-7-6(D)(1) OF THE INDIANA UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO STATE OF INDIANA SECRETARY OF STATE NOTARY. FURTHERMORE, AS INDIANA SERVED AS A LEAD STATE IN THIS MATTER, EDWARD JONES WILL ALSO PAY AN ADDITIONAL $15,000.00 PAYABLE FOR INVESTIGATORY COSTS.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO 710 I.A.C. SECTION 4-7-6(D)(1) OF THE INDIANA UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT, THE INDIANA SECURITIES DIVISION AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE INDIANA SECURITIES ACT ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE STATE OF INDIANA SECRETARY OF STATE NOTARY. FURTHERMORE, AS INDIANA SERVED AS A LEAD STATE IN THIS MATTER, EDWARD JONES WILL ALSO PAY AN ADDITIONAL $15,000.00 PAYABLE FOR INVESTIGATORY COSTS. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 7, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
THE INDIANA OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE SECURITIES DIVISION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 

3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
05/01/2018
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
23-0017 CA
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO 710 I.A.C. SECTION 4-7-6(D)(1) OF THE INDIANA UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT, THE INDIANA SECURITIES DIVISION AS ADMINISTRATOR OF
THE INDIANA SECURITIES ACT ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S
PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE
OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT
ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/20/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE STATE OF INDIANA SECRETARY OF STATE NOTARY.
FURTHERMORE, AS INDIANA SERVED AS A LEAD STATE IN THIS MATTER, EDWARD JONES WILL ALSO PAY AN ADDITIONAL $15,000.00 PAYABLE
FOR INVESTIGATORY COSTS. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 7, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE INDIANA SECURITIES DIVISION FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS
ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A
VIOLATION OF 710 I.A.C. SECTION 4-7-6(D)(1) OF THE INDIANA UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT
OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72
PAYABLE TO STATE OF INDIANA SECRETARY OF STATE NOTARY. FURTHERMORE, AS INDIANA SERVED AS A LEAD STATE IN THIS MATTER, EDWARD JONES
WILL ALSO PAY AN ADDITIONAL $15,000.00 PAYABLE FOR INVESTIGATORY COSTS.
regulatory · block 69PDF pages 173–175
Regulator name — filed text
SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION OF S.C. CODE ANN. § 35­1­412(D)(9). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO S.C. CODE ANN. § 35­1­412(D)(9), THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF SOUTH CAROLINA (THE "SECURITIES COMMISSIONER") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT DECEMBER 26, 2024.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF SOUTH CAROLINA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/03/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
MATTER NO. 20233326
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):

y
p
y
g
y
g
y
(
pp
)
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO S.C. CODE ANN. § 35­1­412(D)(9), THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF SOUTH CAROLINA (THE "SECURITIES COMMISSIONER") ALLEGED
THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY
DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN
BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE
ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/20/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH
CAROLINA. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT DECEMBER 26, 2024.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES
AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A
VIOLATION OF S.C. CODE ANN. § 35­1­412(D)(9). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN
THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA.
regulatory · block 70PDF pages 175–177
Regulator name — filed text
STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND REGULATION, DIVISION OF INSURANCE
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE DIRECTOR FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER- DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION OF ARSD 20:08:03:01(2)(B). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO ARSD 20:08:03:01(2)(B), THE DIRECTOR OF THE DIVISION OF INSURANCE (THE "DIRECTOR") AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE SOUTH DAKOTA SECURITIES ACT ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 16, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File

with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND REGULATION, DIVISION OF INSURANCE
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/03/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
CRD #250
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO ARSD 20:08:03:01(2)(B), THE DIRECTOR OF THE DIVISION OF INSURANCE (THE "DIRECTOR") AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE SOUTH DAKOTA
SECURITIES ACT ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE
NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED
WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND
MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/20/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT
JANUARY 16, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE DIRECTOR FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-
DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION OF ARSD
20:08:03:01(2)(B). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER,
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA.
regulatory · block 71PDF pages 177–179
Regulator name — filed text
STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE DIVISION OF SECURITIES
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE OHIO DIVISION OF SECURITIES FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION OF O.A.C. §1301:6­3­19(B)(9) OF THE OHIO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE OHIO INVESTOR EDUCATION AND ENFORCEMENT EXPENSE FUND.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO O.A.C. §1301:6­3­19(B)(9), THE OHIO DIVISION OF SECURITIES ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE OHIO INVESTOR EDUCATION AND ENFORCEMENT EXPENSE FUND. EDWARD JONES WILL ALSO PAY INVESTIGATORY COSTS OF $15,000. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 16, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 

If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE DIVISION OF SECURITIES
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
05/01/2018
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
DIVISION ORDER NO.: 25-001
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO O.A.C. §1301:6­3­19(B)(9), THE OHIO DIVISION OF SECURITIES ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016
TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE
MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD
JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
01/08/2025
 Exact
 Explanation

If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE OHIO INVESTOR EDUCATION AND ENFORCEMENT EXPENSE FUND.
EDWARD JONES WILL ALSO PAY INVESTIGATORY COSTS OF $15,000. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 16, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE OHIO DIVISION OF SECURITIES FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS
ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED
AS A VIOLATION OF O.A.C. §1301:6­3­19(B)(9) OF THE OHIO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO
THE OHIO INVESTOR EDUCATION AND ENFORCEMENT EXPENSE FUND.
regulatory · block 72PDF pages 179–181
Regulator name — filed text
FINRA
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON DECEMBER 20, 2024, EDWARD JONES ENTERED INTO AN AWC WITH FINRA WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS. EDWARD JONES AGREED TO A CENSURE AND TO PAY RESTITUTION IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,440,979 PLUS INTEREST.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

FINRA ALLEGED THAT, BETWEEN JANUARY 2015 AND JUNE 2020, EDWARD JONES VIOLATED FINRA RULES 3110(A) AND 2010 BY FAILING TO ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN A SYSTEM REASONABLY DESIGNED TO SUPERVISE THE APPLICATION OF SALES CHARGE WAIVERS AND FEE REBATES TO WHICH CUSTOMERS WERE ENTITLED THROUGH RIGHTS OF REINSTATEMENT OFFERED BY MUTUAL FUND COMPANIES. FINRA FURTHER ALLEGED THAT, AS A RESULT, CUSTOMERS PAID $4,440,979 IN EXCESS SALES CHARGES AND FEES BETWEEN JANUARY 2015 AND JUNE 2020.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES WAS CENSURED AND ORDERED TO PAY RESTITUTION TO CUSTOMERS IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,440,979 PLUS INTEREST. THE FIRM MUST PROVIDE FINRA WITH PROOF OF PAYMENT, OR DOCUMENTED EFFORTS UNDERTAKEN TO EFFECT RESTITUTION, WITHIN 180 DAYS OF DECEMBER 20, 2024.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any

event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FINRA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Censure
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
12/20/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
2021069467101
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
FINRA ALLEGED THAT, BETWEEN JANUARY 2015 AND JUNE 2020, EDWARD JONES VIOLATED FINRA RULES 3110(A) AND 2010 BY FAILING TO ESTABLISH
AND MAINTAIN A SYSTEM REASONABLY DESIGNED TO SUPERVISE THE APPLICATION OF SALES CHARGE WAIVERS AND FEE REBATES TO WHICH
CUSTOMERS WERE ENTITLED THROUGH RIGHTS OF REINSTATEMENT OFFERED BY MUTUAL FUND COMPANIES. FINRA FURTHER ALLEGED THAT, AS A
RESULT, CUSTOMERS PAID $4,440,979 IN EXCESS SALES CHARGES AND FEES BETWEEN JANUARY 2015 AND JUNE 2020.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/20/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:

Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES WAS CENSURED AND ORDERED TO PAY RESTITUTION TO CUSTOMERS IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,440,979 PLUS INTEREST. THE FIRM
MUST PROVIDE FINRA WITH PROOF OF PAYMENT, OR DOCUMENTED EFFORTS UNDERTAKEN TO EFFECT RESTITUTION, WITHIN 180 DAYS OF
DECEMBER 20, 2024.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON DECEMBER 20, 2024, EDWARD JONES ENTERED INTO AN AWC WITH FINRA WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS. EDWARD JONES
AGREED TO A CENSURE AND TO PAY RESTITUTION IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,440,979 PLUS INTEREST.
regulatory · block 73PDF pages 181–182
Regulator name — filed text
THE ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, COMMUNITY, AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF BANKING AND SECURITIES
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, COMMUNITY, AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF BANKING AND SECURITIES COMMISSION FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER- DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF 3 AAC 08.030(A)(2). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE STATE OF ALASKA.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO ALASKA STATUTE 3 AAC 08.030(A)(2) THE STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, COMMUNITY, AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF BANKING AND SECURITIES ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018 (THE "INVESTIGATION PERIOD"), EDWARD JONES' PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE STATE OF ALASKA. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 7, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:

SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
THE ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, COMMUNITY, AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF BANKING AND SECURITIES
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/03/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
23-106-S
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO ALASKA STATUTE 3 AAC 08.030(A)(2) THE STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, COMMUNITY, AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION OF BANKING AND SECURITIES ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018 (THE "INVESTIGATION
PERIOD"), EDWARD JONES' PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS
RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE
AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/20/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE STATE OF ALASKA. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT
JANUARY 7, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, COMMUNITY, AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF BANKING AND SECURITIES
COMMISSION FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-
DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF 3 AAC
08.030(A)(2). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD
JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE STATE OF ALASKA.
regulatory · block 74PDF pages 183–184
Regulator name — filed text
STATE OF CONNECTICUT'S DEPARTMENT OF BANKING SECURITIES AND BUSINESS INVESTMENTS DIVISION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

STATE OF CONNECTICUT'S DEPARTMENT OF BANKING SECURITIES AND BUSINESS INVESTMENTS DIVISION FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION 36B-31-6F(B) OF THE REGULATIONS OF CONNECTICUT STATE AGENCIES. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE TREASURER, STATE OF CONNECTICUT. EDWARD JONES WILL ADDITIONALLY PAY $15,000.00 FOR INVESTIGATORY COSTS.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO SECTION 36B-31-6F(B) OF THE REGULATIONS OF CONNECTICUT STATE AGENCIES, THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT'S DEPARTMENT OF BANKING SECURITIES AND BUSINESS INVESTMENTS DIVISION ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE TREASURER, STATE OF CONNECTICUT . EDWARD JONES WILL ALSO PAY $15,000.00 FOR INVESTIGATORY COSTS. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT DECEMBER 26, 2024.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
STATE OF CONNECTICUT'S DEPARTMENT OF BANKING SECURITIES AND BUSINESS INVESTMENTS DIVISION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
05/01/2018
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:

4.
Docket/Case Number:
CO-23-11056-S
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO SECTION 36B-31-6F(B) OF THE REGULATIONS OF CONNECTICUT STATE AGENCIES, THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT'S DEPARTMENT OF
BANKING SECURITIES AND BUSINESS INVESTMENTS DIVISION ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018,
THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS
RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE
AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/20/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE TREASURER, STATE OF CONNECTICUT . EDWARD JONES
WILL ALSO PAY $15,000.00 FOR INVESTIGATORY COSTS. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT DECEMBER 26, 2024.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
STATE OF CONNECTICUT'S DEPARTMENT OF BANKING SECURITIES AND BUSINESS INVESTMENTS DIVISION FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE
REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD
HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION 36B-31-6F(B) OF THE REGULATIONS OF CONNECTICUT STATE AGENCIES.
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO
PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE TREASURER, STATE OF CONNECTICUT. EDWARD JONES WILL ADDITIONALLY
PAY $15,000.00 FOR INVESTIGATORY COSTS.
regulatory · block 75PDF pages 184–186
Regulator name — filed text
STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF HAWAII REVISED STATUTES § 485A­412(D)(9). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE GENERAL FUND OF THE STATE OF HAWAII.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO HAWAII REVISED STATUTES § 485A­412(D)(9) THE HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE GENERAL FUND OF THE STATE OF HAWAII. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 10, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)

11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/03/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
SEB20230062
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):

PURSUANT TO HAWAII REVISED STATUTES § 485A­412(D)(9) THE HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS ALLEGED THAT,
DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED
WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE
CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/20/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE GENERAL FUND OF THE STATE OF HAWAII. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE
ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 10, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES
WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED,
WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF HAWAII REVISED STATUTES § 485A­412(D)(9). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO
THE GENERAL FUND OF THE STATE OF HAWAII.
regulatory · block 76PDF pages 186–188
Regulator name — filed text
THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF IDAHO ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES ACT RULE 12.01.08.105.03. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE GENERAL FUND OF THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF IDAHO.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO IDAHO ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES ACT RULE 12.01.08.105.03 THE IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE GENERAL FUND OF THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF IDAHO. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 7, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)

You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/03/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
2023-7-06
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO IDAHO ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES ACT RULE 12.01.08.105.03 THE IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE
PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT
TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS
HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:

Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/20/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE GENERAL FUND OF THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF IDAHO. SUCH
PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 7, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS
ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A
VIOLATION OF IDAHO ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES ACT RULE 12.01.08.105.03. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO
THE GENERAL FUND OF THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF IDAHO.
regulatory · block 77PDF pages 188–190
Regulator name — filed text
THE ILLINOIS SECURITIES DEPARTMENT
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE ILLINOIS SECURITIES DEPARTMENT FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF SECTION 8.E(1)(E)(IV) OF THE ILLINOIS SECURITIES LAW OF 1953. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE ILLINOIS SECURITIES DEPARTMENT.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO SECTION 8.E(1)(E)(IV) OF THE ILLINOIS SECURITIES LAW OF 1953, THE ILLINOIS SECURITIES DIVISION AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ILLINOIS SECURITIES LAW, ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE ILLINOIS OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT DECEMBER 30, 2024.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is

registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
THE ILLINOIS SECURITIES DEPARTMENT
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/03/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
FILE NO. 2300475
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO SECTION 8.E(1)(E)(IV) OF THE ILLINOIS SECURITIES LAW OF 1953, THE ILLINOIS SECURITIES DIVISION AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE
ILLINOIS SECURITIES LAW, ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S
PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE
OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT
ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/20/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution

 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE ILLINOIS OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE. SUCH
PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT DECEMBER 30, 2024.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE ILLINOIS SECURITIES DEPARTMENT FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS
ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A
VIOLATION OF SECTION 8.E(1)(E)(IV) OF THE ILLINOIS SECURITIES LAW OF 1953. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72
PAYABLE TO THE ILLINOIS SECURITIES DEPARTMENT.
regulatory · block 78PDF pages 190–192
Regulator name — filed text
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, WEST VIRGINIA SECURITIES COMMISSION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE SECURITIES COMMISSION FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION OF § 32­2­204(A)(2)(J) OF THE SECURITIES ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO § 32­2­204(A)(2)(J) OF THE WEST VIRGINIA UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT (THE "SECURITIES ACT"), THE WEST VIRGINIA SECURITIES COMMISSION (THE "SECURITIES COMMISSION") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER- DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT DECEMBER 24, 2024.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.

 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, WEST VIRGINIA SECURITIES COMMISSION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/03/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
MATTER NO. 23-0071
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO § 32­2­204(A)(2)(J) OF THE WEST VIRGINIA UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT (THE "SECURITIES ACT"), THE WEST VIRGINIA SECURITIES
COMMISSION (THE "SECURITIES COMMISSION") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-
DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE
FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR
INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/20/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT
DECEMBER 24, 2024.

13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE SECURITIES COMMISSION FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES
AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A
VIOLATION OF § 32­2­204(A)(2)(J) OF THE SECURITIES ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE STATE OF WEST
VIRGINIA.
regulatory · block 79PDF pages 192–193
Regulator name — filed text
THE GEORGIA COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF O.C.G.A. RULE 590-4-5-.12. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE GEORGIA SECRETARY OF STATE REVENUE.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT, TO RULE 590-4-5-.12 OF THE GEORGIA UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT, THE COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE GEORGIA SECRETARY OF STATE REVENUE. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 10, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
THE GEORGIA COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)

(
)
( )
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/03/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
ENSC-241123
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT, TO RULE 590-4-5-.12 OF THE GEORGIA UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT, THE COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA
ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY
DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN
BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE
ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/20/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE GEORGIA SECRETARY OF STATE REVENUE. SUCH PAYMENT
WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 10, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES
WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED,
WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF O.C.G.A. RULE 590-4-5-.12. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF
LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE
GEORGIA SECRETARY OF STATE REVENUE.
regulatory · block 80PDF pages 193–195
Regulator name — filed text
THE DELAWARE INVESTOR PROTECTION UNIT
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE INVESTOR PROTECTION DIRECTOR OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF RULE 609(B)(4)(A) OF THE DELAWARE SECURITIES ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE INVESTOR PROTECTION FUND OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT, TO RULE 609(B)(4)(A) OF THE RULES PURSUANT TO THE DELAWARE SECURITIES ACT, THE INVESTOR PROTECTION DIRECTOR OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE STATE OF DELAWARE. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 10, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,

11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
THE DELAWARE INVESTOR PROTECTION UNIT
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/03/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
23-0136
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):

6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT, TO RULE 609(B)(4)(A) OF THE RULES PURSUANT TO THE DELAWARE SECURITIES ACT, THE INVESTOR PROTECTION DIRECTOR OF THE STATE
OF DELAWARE ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE
NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED
WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND
MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/20/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE STATE OF DELAWARE. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR
ABOUT JANUARY 10, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE INVESTOR PROTECTION DIRECTOR OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED
PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE
CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF RULE 609(B)(4)(A) OF THE DELAWARE SECURITIES ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING
THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE
MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE INVESTOR PROTECTION FUND OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE.
regulatory · block 81PDF pages 195–197
Regulator name — filed text
STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL REGULATION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE COMMISSIONER FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION OF V.S.R. § 2­2 OF THE ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $272,641.52 TO THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL REGULATION, AS WELL AS PROVIDING A CONTRIBUTION OF $48,113.20 TO THE VERMONT FINANCIAL SERVICES EDUCATION AND VICTIM RESTITUTION SPECIAL FUND.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO V.S.R. § 2­2 OF THE VERMONT UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT ("ACT"), THE COMMISSIONER OF FINANCIAL REGULATION (THE "COMMISSIONER") FOR THE STATE OF VERMONT ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER- DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $272,641.52 TO THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL REGULATION, AS WELL AS PROVIDING A CONTRIBUTION OF $48,113.20 TO THE VERMONT FINANCIAL SERVICES EDUCATION AND VICTIM RESTITUTION SPECIAL FUND. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 3, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 

One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL REGULATION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/03/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
DOCKET NO. 23-016-S
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO V.S.R. § 2­2 OF THE VERMONT UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT ("ACT"), THE COMMISSIONER OF FINANCIAL REGULATION (THE
"COMMISSIONER") FOR THE STATE OF VERMONT ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-
DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE
FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR
INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final

9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/20/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $272,641.52 TO THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL REGULATION, AS WELL AS PROVIDING A
CONTRIBUTION OF $48,113.20 TO THE VERMONT FINANCIAL SERVICES EDUCATION AND VICTIM RESTITUTION SPECIAL FUND. SUCH PAYMENT
WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 3, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE COMMISSIONER FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A
BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION
OF V.S.R. § 2­2 OF THE ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT
ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $272,641.52 TO THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL REGULATION, AS
WELL AS PROVIDING A CONTRIBUTION OF $48,113.20 TO THE VERMONT FINANCIAL SERVICES EDUCATION AND VICTIM RESTITUTION SPECIAL FUND.
regulatory · block 82PDF pages 197–199
Regulator name — filed text
THE ENFORCEMENT SECTION OF THE MISSOURI SECURITIES DIVISION OF THE OFFICE OF SECRETARY OF STATE
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE ENFORCEMENT SECTION OF THE MISSOURI SECURITIES DIVISION OF THE OFFICE OF SECRETARY OF STATE FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF 15 CSR 30-51.171(2)(A) OF THE MISSOURI SECURITIES ACT OF 2003. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE MISSOURI SECRETARY OF STATE INVESTOR EDUCATION AND PROTECTION FUND.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO 15 CSR 30-51.171(2)(A) OF THE MISSOURI SECURITIES ACT OF 2003, THE ENFORCEMENT SECTION OF THE MISSOURI SECURITIES DIVISION OF THE OFFICE OF SECRETARY OF STATE ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE MISSOURI SECRETARY OF STATE INVESTOR EDUCATION AND PROTECTION FUND. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT DECEMBER 17, 2024.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 

g
y
g
y
(
)
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
THE ENFORCEMENT SECTION OF THE MISSOURI SECURITIES DIVISION OF THE OFFICE OF SECRETARY OF STATE
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
05/01/2018
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
AP-23-18
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO 15 CSR 30-51.171(2)(A) OF THE MISSOURI SECURITIES ACT OF 2003, THE ENFORCEMENT SECTION OF THE MISSOURI SECURITIES
DIVISION OF THE OFFICE OF SECRETARY OF STATE ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE
BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS
RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE
AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):

12/19/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE MISSOURI SECRETARY OF STATE INVESTOR EDUCATION AND
PROTECTION FUND. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT DECEMBER 17, 2024.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE ENFORCEMENT SECTION OF THE MISSOURI SECURITIES DIVISION OF THE OFFICE OF SECRETARY OF STATE FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT
HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT
WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF 15 CSR 30-51.171(2)(A) OF THE MISSOURI SECURITIES ACT
OF 2003. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES
AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE MISSOURI SECRETARY OF STATE INVESTOR EDUCATION AND
PROTECTION FUND.
regulatory · block 83PDF pages 199–201
Regulator name — filed text
THE IOWA INSURANCE DIVISION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE IOWA INSURANCE COMMISSIONER FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF IOWA CODE § 502.412(4)(I). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE IOWA INSURANCE DIVISION'S ENFORCEMENT FUND.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO IOWA CODE § 502.412(4)(I), THE IOWA INSURANCE DIVISION ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE IOWA INSURANCE DIVISION'S ENFORCEMENT FUND. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 10, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.

If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
THE IOWA INSURANCE DIVISION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/03/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
CASE NO. 119293
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO IOWA CODE § 502.412(4)(I), THE IOWA INSURANCE DIVISION ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO
JUNE 3, 2018, THE BROKER-DEALER'S PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE
MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD
JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/20/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:

Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE IOWA INSURANCE DIVISION'S ENFORCEMENT FUND. SUCH PAYMENT
WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 10, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE IOWA INSURANCE COMMISSIONER FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS
ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED A
VIOLATION OF IOWA CODE § 502.412(4)(I). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACT OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE
CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 PAYABLE TO THE IOWA INSURANCE
DIVISION'S ENFORCEMENT FUND.
regulatory · block 84Bjerke, Justin, MichaelPDF pages 201–202
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
Bjerke, Justin, Michael
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
5870149
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
Bjerke, Justin, Michael
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to

the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 85PDF pages 202–204
Regulator name — filed text
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 320,754.72
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE COMMISSION FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER- DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION OF 21 VAC-5-20-260 OF THE ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE TREASURER OF VIRGINIA.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

PURSUANT TO 21 VAC-5-20-260 OF THE VIRGINIA SECURITIES ACT (THE "ACT"), THE VIRGINIA STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION (THE "COMMISSION") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018 (THE "INVESTIGATION PERIOD"), EDWARD JONES PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE TREASURER OF VIRGINIA. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT FEBRUARY 27, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,

11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/03/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
CASE NO. SEC-2024-00016
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):

6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO 21 VAC-5-20-260 OF THE VIRGINIA SECURITIES ACT (THE "ACT"), THE VIRGINIA STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION (THE
"COMMISSION") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 3, 2018 (THE "INVESTIGATION PERIOD"), EDWARD
JONES PROCEDURES WERE NOT REASONABLY DESIGNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN CLASS A SHARE MUTUAL FUNDS RELATIVE TO THE
FEE OFFSETS PROVIDED WHEN CERTAIN BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS HOLDING THOSE SECURITIES ENGAGED EDWARD JONES TO SERVE AS THEIR
INVESTMENT ADVISER AND MANAGE THOSE ASSETS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
02/18/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 320,754.72
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE TREASURER OF VIRGINIA. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE ON OR ABOUT
FEBRUARY 27, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE COMMISSION FOUND THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS ACTIVITIES AS A BROKER-
DEALER DURING THE INVESTIGATION PERIOD THAT WOULD HAVE DETECTED THE CONDUCT ALLEGED, WHICH CONSTITUTED AS A VIOLATION OF 21
VAC-5-20-260 OF THE ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OF FACTS OR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SET FORTH IN THE CONSENT
ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE MONETARY FINE OF $320,754.72 TO THE TREASURER OF VIRGINIA.
regulatory · block 86PDF pages 204–206
Regulator name — filed text
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 500.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON APRIL 9, 2025, EDWARD JONES ENTERED INTO CONSENT ORDER WITH THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS (THE "DEPARTMENT") TO RESOLVE THIS MATTER. EDWARD JONES DID NOT CONTEST THAT IT FAILED TO FORWARD TWO ANNUITY BENEFICIARY CHANGE FORMS TO ITS CLIENT'S INSURANCE COMPANIES. THE DEPARTMENT FOUND THAT FAILURE TO "DEMONSTRATE[] INCOMPETENCE IN THE CONDUCT OF BUSINESS" UNDER ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES SECTION 20-295(A)(8). THEREFORE, PURSUANT TO SECTION (A)(2), THE DEPARTMENT IMPOSED A CIVIL PENALTY OF $250.00 FOR EACH FORM, FOR A TOTAL OF $500.00, WHICH EDWARD JONES PAID ON APRIL 2, 2025.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES VIOLATED AN INSURANCE LAW AND WAS LIABLE FOR A CIVIL PENALTY UNDER ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES SECTION 20-295(A)(2) IN CONNECTION WITH ITS FAILURE TO FORWARD BENEFICIARY CHANGE FORMS TO A CLIENT'S INSURANCE COMPANIES.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES PAID THE $500.00 TO THE DEPARTMENT ON APRIL 2, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 

One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
04/09/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
25A-006-INS
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Insurance
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES VIOLATED AN INSURANCE LAW AND WAS
LIABLE FOR A CIVIL PENALTY UNDER ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES SECTION 20-295(A)(2) IN CONNECTION WITH ITS FAILURE TO FORWARD
BENEFICIARY CHANGE FORMS TO A CLIENT'S INSURANCE COMPANIES.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:

pp
g
y
pp
(
)
pp
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
04/09/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 500.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES PAID THE $500.00 TO THE DEPARTMENT ON APRIL 2, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON APRIL 9, 2025, EDWARD JONES ENTERED INTO CONSENT ORDER WITH THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
(THE "DEPARTMENT") TO RESOLVE THIS MATTER. EDWARD JONES DID NOT CONTEST THAT IT FAILED TO FORWARD TWO ANNUITY BENEFICIARY CHANGE
FORMS TO ITS CLIENT'S INSURANCE COMPANIES. THE DEPARTMENT FOUND THAT FAILURE TO "DEMONSTRATE[] INCOMPETENCE IN THE CONDUCT OF
BUSINESS" UNDER ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES SECTION 20-295(A)(8). THEREFORE, PURSUANT TO SECTION (A)(2), THE DEPARTMENT IMPOSED A
CIVIL PENALTY OF $250.00 FOR EACH FORM, FOR A TOTAL OF $500.00, WHICH EDWARD JONES PAID ON APRIL 2, 2025.
regulatory · block 87PDF pages 206–208
Regulator name — filed text
SECURITIES DIVISION OF THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON JUNE 4, 2025, THE DIVISION ALLEGED THAT, DURING TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF MASS. GEN. LAWS C. 110A, SECTION 204(A)(2)(J). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF THE MASSACHUSETTS SECURITIES ACT AND THE REGULATIONS THEREUNDER, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED MASSACHUSETTS CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $114,782, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, TO PAY INVESTIGATION COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND INVESTIGATION COSTS WERE PAID ON JUNE 17, 2025, AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE SECURITIES DIVISION OF THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS ("DIVISION") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 ("TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARDJONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF MASS. GEN. LAWS C. 110A, SECTION 204(A)(2)(J).

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF THE MASSACHUSETTS SECURITIES ACT AND THE REGULATIONS THEREUNDER, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED MASSACHUSETTS CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $114,782, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, TO PAY INVESTIGATION COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND INVESTIGATION COSTS WERE PAID ON JUNE 17, 2025, AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE

No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
SECURITIES DIVISION OF THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; INVESTIGATION COSTS; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
06/04/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
DOCKET NO. 2025-0191
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE SECURITIES DIVISION OF THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS ("DIVISION") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 ("TIME
PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARDJONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE
PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO
ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF MASS. GEN. LAWS C. 110A, SECTION 204(A)(2)(J).
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
06/04/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:

12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS; INVESTIGATION COSTS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF THE MASSACHUSETTS SECURITIES ACT AND THE REGULATIONS
THEREUNDER, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED MASSACHUSETTS CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $114,782, TO PAY AN
ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, TO PAY INVESTIGATION COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH
CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND INVESTIGATION COSTS WERE PAID ON JUNE 17, 2025, AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE
PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON JUNE 4, 2025, THE DIVISION ALLEGED THAT, DURING TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED
AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED
MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF MASS. GEN.
LAWS C. 110A, SECTION 204(A)(2)(J). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED
TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF THE MASSACHUSETTS SECURITIES ACT AND THE
REGULATIONS THEREUNDER, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED MASSACHUSETTS CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $114,782, TO PAY
AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, TO PAY INVESTIGATION COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN
UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND INVESTIGATION COSTS WERE PAID ON JUNE 17, 2025, AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 88Parker, John, PaulPDF pages 208–210
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
Parker, John, Paul
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
2463577
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No

Name:
Parker, John, Paul
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction

 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 89PDF pages 210–212
Regulator name — filed text
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND SECURITIES
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON SEPTEMBER 5, 2025, THE DIVISION ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF THE PENNSYLVANIA SECURITIES ACT, 70 P.S. §1­305(A)(VII). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF THE PENNSYLVANIA CODE AND THE REGULATIONS THEREUNDER, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED PENNSYLVANIA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $241,040.51, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND SECURITIES ("DEPARTMENT") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF THE PENNSYLVANIA SECURITIES ACT, 70 P.S. §1­305(A)(VII).

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF THE PENNSYLVANIA SECURITIES ACT, 70 P.S. §1­305(A)(VII), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED PENNSYLVANIA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $241,040.51, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign

(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND SECURITIES
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
09/05/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
DOCKET NO. 250026 (SEC-ORD)
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND SECURITIES ("DEPARTMENT") ALLEGED THAT,
DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES")
FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN
SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A
REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF THE PENNSYLVANIA SECURITIES ACT, 70 P.S. §1­305(A)(VII).
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
09/05/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF THE PENNSYLVANIA SECURITIES ACT, 70 P.S. §1­305(A)(VII), TO PROVIDE
RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED PENNSYLVANIA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $241,040.51, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN
THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT
ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON SEPTEMBER 5, 2025, THE DIVISION ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE

EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT
INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF
THE PENNSYLVANIA SECURITIES ACT, 70 P.S. §1­305(A)(VII). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW,
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF THE PENNSYLVANIA CODE AND
THE REGULATIONS THEREUNDER, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED PENNSYLVANIA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $241,040.51,
AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 90PDF pages 212–213
Regulator name — filed text
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 5,500.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Settled

Action status / disposition — filed text

PURSUANT TO A VOLUNTARY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY CIVIL PENALTY OF$5,500.00 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, WHICH WAS PAID SEPTEMBER 3, 2025.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE ALLEGED, PURSUANT TO NORTH CAROLINA GENERALSTATUTE SECTION 58-33-32(K), THAT EDWARD JONES FAILED TO TIMELY REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONSTAKEN WITH RESPECT TO ITS LICENSE WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER DISPOSITION OF MATTERS WITH STATE ANDTERRITORY REGULATORS FOLLOWING AN INVESTIGATION COORDINATED AMONG MEMBERS OF THE NORTHAMERICAN ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION (NASAA) OF ITS CONDUCT.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A CIVIL PENALTY OF $5,500.00 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OFINSURANCE, WHICH WAS PAID SEPTEMBER 3, 2025.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)

Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
09/03/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
ASD FILE #96200
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE ALLEGED, PURSUANT TO NORTH CAROLINA GENERALSTATUTE SECTION 58-33-32(K), THAT EDWARD
JONES FAILED TO TIMELY REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONSTAKEN WITH RESPECT TO ITS LICENSE WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER DISPOSITION OF MATTERS
WITH STATE ANDTERRITORY REGULATORS FOLLOWING AN INVESTIGATION COORDINATED AMONG MEMBERS OF THE NORTHAMERICAN
ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION (NASAA) OF ITS CONDUCT.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Settled
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
09/03/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 5,500.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY A CIVIL PENALTY OF $5,500.00 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OFINSURANCE, WHICH WAS PAID
SEPTEMBER 3, 2025.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
PURSUANT TO A VOLUNTARY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY CIVIL PENALTY OF$5,500.00 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, WHICH WAS PAID SEPTEMBER 3, 2025.
regulatory · block 91PDF pages 213–215
Regulator name — filed text
WEST VIRGINIA SECURITIES COMMISSION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON SEPTEMBER 3, 2025, THE WEST VIRGINIA SECURITIES COMMISSION ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF WEST VIRGINIA SECURITIES ACT SECTION 32-2-204(A)(2)(J). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF THE WEST VIRGINIA SECURITIES ACT AND THE REGULATIONS THEREUNDER, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED WEST VIRGINIA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $58,901.77, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE WEST VIRGINIA SECURITIES COMMISSION ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF WEST VIRGINIA UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT, W. VA. CODE SECTION 32-2-204(A)(2)(J).

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF THE WEST VIRGINIA SECURITIES ACT, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED WEST VIRGINIA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $58,901.77, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:

11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
WEST VIRGINIA SECURITIES COMMISSION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST;
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
09/03/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
CASE NO.: 25-0060
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 

7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE WEST VIRGINIA SECURITIES COMMISSION ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD
OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE
CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL
EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE
COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF WEST VIRGINIA UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT, W. VA. CODE SECTION 32-2-204(A)(2)(J).
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
09/03/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF THE WEST VIRGINIA SECURITIES ACT, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO
AFFECTED WEST VIRGINIA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $58,901.77, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF
$100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON SEPTEMBER 3, 2025, THE WEST VIRGINIA SECURITIES COMMISSION ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE
CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL
EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE
COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF WEST VIRGINIA SECURITIES ACT SECTION 32-2-204(A)(2)(J). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF
FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF
THE WEST VIRGINIA SECURITIES ACT AND THE REGULATIONS THEREUNDER, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED WEST VIRGINIA CUSTOMERS IN
AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $58,901.77, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE
RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 92PDF pages 215–217
Regulator name — filed text
STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION OF FINANCIAL REGULATION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON SEPTEMBER 4, 2025, THE DIVISION ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF ORS 59.205(13) AND OAR 441-205-0210(1). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF THE OREGON SECURITIES ACT AND THE REGULATIONS THEREUNDER, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED OREGON CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $203,494.79, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND BUSINESS SERVICES ("DIRECTOR") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF OREGON REVISED STATUTES 59.205(13) AND OREGON ADMINISTRATIVE RULE 441-205-0210(1).

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF THE OREGON SECURITIES ACT, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED OREGON CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $203,494.79, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.

Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION OF FINANCIAL REGULATION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST;
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
09/04/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
CASE NO. S-25-0038
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND BUSINESS SERVICES
("DIRECTOR") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES &
CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT

REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD
JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF OREGON REVISED STATUTES 59.205(13) AND OREGON
ADMINISTRATIVE RULE 441-205-0210(1).
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
09/04/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF THE OREGON SECURITIES ACT, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED
OREGON CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $203,494.79, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE
ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON SEPTEMBER 4, 2025, THE DIVISION ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE
EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT
INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF
ORS 59.205(13) AND OAR 441-205-0210(1). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES
AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF THE OREGON SECURITIES ACT AND THE
REGULATIONS THEREUNDER, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED OREGON CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $203,494.79, AND TO PAY
AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 93PDF pages 217–219
Regulator name — filed text
SECURITIES DIVISION OF THE NEW MEXICO REGULATION AND LICENSING DEPARTMENT
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON OCTOBER 14, 2025, THE DIVISION ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF NMSA 1978 SECTION 58-13C-412(C)(9). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF THE NEW MEXICO UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED NEW MEXICO CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $75,472.63, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE DIRECTOR OF THE SECURITIES DIVISION OF THE NEW MEXICO REGULATION AND LICENSING DEPARTMENT (THE "DIVISION") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF THE NEW MEXICO UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT 1978 SECTION 58-13C-412(C)(9).

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF THE NEW MEXICO UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED NEW MEXICO CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $75,472.63, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.

PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
SECURITIES DIVISION OF THE NEW MEXICO REGULATION AND LICENSING DEPARTMENT
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
10/14/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
CASE NO. MS 25-07-10-2
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE DIRECTOR OF THE SECURITIES DIVISION OF THE NEW MEXICO REGULATION
AND LICENSING DEPARTMENT (THE "DIVISION") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME
PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND
REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION
CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF THE NEW MEXICO UNIFORM
SECURITIES ACT 1978 SECTION 58-13C-412(C)(9).

8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
10/14/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF THE NEW MEXICO UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO
AFFECTED NEW MEXICO CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $75,472.63, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF
$100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON OCTOBER 14, 2025, THE DIVISION ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE
EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT
INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF
NMSA 1978 SECTION 58-13C-412(C)(9). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES
AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF THE NEW MEXICO UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT,
TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED NEW MEXICO CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $75,472.63, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE
IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT
ORDER.
regulatory · block 94PDF pages 219–221
Regulator name — filed text
OHIO DIVISION OF SECURITIES
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON SEPTEMBER 25, 2025, THE DIVISION ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF OHIO REVISED CODE 1707.19(A)(1)(I). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF THE OHIO REVISED CODE AND THE REGULATIONS THEREUNDER, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED OHIO CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $506,326.10, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE OHIO DIVISION OF SECURITIES ("DIVISION") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF THE OHIO REVISED CODE 1707.19(A)(1)(I).

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF THE OHIO REVISED CODE, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED OHIO CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $506,326.10, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)

You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
OHIO DIVISION OF SECURITIES
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
09/25/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
DIVISION ORDER NO: 25-014
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE OHIO DIVISION OF SECURITIES ("DIVISION") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE
PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO
ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL
PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A
REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF THE OHIO REVISED CODE 1707.19(A)(1)(I).
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.

10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
09/25/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF THE OHIO REVISED CODE, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED OHIO
CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $506,326.10, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE
ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON SEPTEMBER 25, 2025, THE DIVISION ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE
EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT
INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF
OHIO REVISED CODE 1707.19(A)(1)(I). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED
TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF THE OHIO REVISED CODE AND THE REGULATIONS
THEREUNDER, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED OHIO CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $506,326.10, AND TO PAY AN
ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 95PDF pages 221–223
Regulator name — filed text
ARKANSAS SECURITIES DEPARTMENT
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON OCTOBER 13, 2025, THE ARKANSAS SECURITIES DEPARTMENT ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF ARK. CODE ANN. SECTIONS 23-42-301(F)(1). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF ARKANSAS SECURITIES ACT AND THE REGULATIONS THEREUNDER, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED ARKANSAS CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $170,530.58, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE ARKANSAS SECURITIES DEPARTMENT ("STAFF") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF ARK. CODE ANN. SECTIONS 23-42-301(F)(1).

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF ARK. CODE ANN. SECTIONS 23-42-301(F)(1), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED ARKANSAS CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $170,530.58, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.

ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
ARKANSAS SECURITIES DEPARTMENT
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
10/13/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
ORDER NO. S-25-0017-25-OR01
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE ARKANSAS SECURITIES DEPARTMENT ("STAFF") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE
PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO
ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL
PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A
REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF ARK. CODE ANN. SECTIONS 23-42-301(F)(1).
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):

10/13/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF ARK. CODE ANN. SECTIONS 23-42-301(F)(1), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO
AFFECTED ARKANSAS CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $170,530.58, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF
$100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON OCTOBER 13, 2025, THE ARKANSAS SECURITIES DEPARTMENT ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE
CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL
EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE
COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF ARK. CODE ANN. SECTIONS 23-42-301(F)(1). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR
VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF
ARKANSAS SECURITIES ACT AND THE REGULATIONS THEREUNDER, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED ARKANSAS CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO
LESS THAN $170,530.58, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL
BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 96PDF pages 223–225
Regulator name — filed text
CONNECTICUT BANKING COMMISSIONER
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON OCTOBER 8, 2025, THE COMMISSIONER ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 36B-31-6F(B) OF THE REGULATIONS OF CONNECTICUT STATE AGENCIES PROMULGATED UNDER THE CONNECTICUT UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 36B-31-6F(B) OF THE REGULATIONS OF CONNECTICUT STATE AGENCIES PROMULGATED UNDER THE CONNECTICUT UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT AND THE REGULATIONS THEREUNDER, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED CONNECTICUT CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $72,702.37, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE BANKING COMMISSIONER ("COMMISSIONER") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 36B-31-6F(B) OF THE REGULATIONS OF CONNECTICUT STATE AGENCIES PROMULGATED UNDER THE CONNECTICUT UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT.

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 36B-31-6F(B) OF THE REGULATIONS OF CONNECTICUT STATE AGENCIES PROMULGATED UNDER THE CONNECTICUT UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED CONNECTICUT CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $72,702.37, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.

This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
CONNECTICUT BANKING COMMISSIONER
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
10/08/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
NO. CO-25-202525-S
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE BANKING COMMISSIONER ("COMMISSIONER") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE
PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO
ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL
PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A
REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 36B-31-6F(B) OF THE REGULATIONS OF CONNECTICUT STATE AGENCIES PROMULGATED UNDER
THE CONNECTICUT UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
10/08/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:

A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 36B-31-6F(B) OF THE REGULATIONS OF CONNECTICUT STATE
AGENCIES PROMULGATED UNDER THE CONNECTICUT UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED CONNECTICUT
CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $72,702.37, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE
ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON OCTOBER 8, 2025, THE COMMISSIONER ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS
WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT
INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF
SECTION 36B-31-6F(B) OF THE REGULATIONS OF CONNECTICUT STATE AGENCIES PROMULGATED UNDER THE CONNECTICUT UNIFORM SECURITIES
ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 36B-31-6F(B) OF THE REGULATIONS OF CONNECTICUT STATE AGENCIES
PROMULGATED UNDER THE CONNECTICUT UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT AND THE REGULATIONS THEREUNDER, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED
CONNECTICUT CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $72,702.37, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE
ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 97PDF pages 225–227
Regulator name — filed text
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF SECURITIES
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON OCTOBER 8, 2025, THE DEPARTMENT ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 1-411(D)(9) OF THE OKLAHOMA UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 1-411(D)(9) OF THE OKLAHOMA UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT AND THE REGULATIONS THEREUNDER, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED OKLAHOMA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $238,568.91, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF SECURITIES ("DEPARTMENT") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 1-411(D)(9) OF THE OKLAHOMA UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT.

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 1-411(D)(9) OF THE OKLAHOMA UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED OKLAHOMA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $238,568.91, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.

If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF SECURITIES
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
10/08/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
ODS FILE 25-232
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF SECURITIES ("DEPARTMENT") ALLEGED THAT,
DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES")
FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN
SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A
REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 1-411(D)(9) OF THE OKLAHOMA UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
10/08/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction

j
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 1-411(D)(9) OF THE OKLAHOMA UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT, TO
PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED OKLAHOMA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $238,568.91, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE
IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE
CONSENT ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON OCTOBER 8, 2025, THE DEPARTMENT ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE
EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT
INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF
SECTION 1-411(D)(9) OF THE OKLAHOMA UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF
LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 1-411(D)(9) OF
THE OKLAHOMA UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT AND THE REGULATIONS THEREUNDER, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED OKLAHOMA CUSTOMERS IN
AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $238,568.91, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE
RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 98PDF pages 227–229
Regulator name — filed text
THE SOUTH DAKOTA DIVISION OF INSURANCE
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON OCTOBER 9, 2025, THE SOUTH DAKOTA DIVISION OF INSURANCE ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF SDCL 47-31B-412(D)(9). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF SDCL 47-31B-412(D)(9) AND THE REGULATIONS THEREUNDER, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED SOUTH DAKOTA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $51,621.51, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE SOUTH DAKOTA DIVISION OF INSURANCE ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF SDCL 47-31B-412(D)(9).

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF SDCL 47-31B-412(D)(9), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED SOUTH DAKOTA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $51,621.51, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the

circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
THE SOUTH DAKOTA DIVISION OF INSURANCE
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
10/09/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
ADMIN CONSENT ORDER
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE SOUTH DAKOTA DIVISION OF INSURANCE ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD
OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE
CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL
EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE
COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF SDCL 47-31B-412(D)(9).
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
10/09/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,

Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF SDCL 47-31B-412(D)(9), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED SOUTH
DAKOTA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $51,621.51, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE
ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON OCTOBER 9, 2025, THE SOUTH DAKOTA DIVISION OF INSURANCE ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE
CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL
EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE
COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF SDCL 47-31B-412(D)(9). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW,
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF SDCL 47-31B-412(D)(9) AND
THE REGULATIONS THEREUNDER, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED SOUTH DAKOTA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $51,621.51, AND
TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 99PDF pages 229–231
Regulator name — filed text
VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL REGULATION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON OCTOBER 9, 2025, THE DEPARTMENT ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF VERMONT SECURITIES REGULATION SECTION 2-2(B)(2). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF VERMONT'S UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT AND THE REGULATIONS THEREUNDER, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED VERMONT CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $33,919.48, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $85,000, AND TO CONTRIBUTE $15,000 TO THE VERMONT FINANCIAL SERVICES EDUCATION AND VICTIM RESTITUTION SPECIAL FUND. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE, THE CONTRIBUTION AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL REGULATION ("DEPARTMENT") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF VERMONT SECURITIES REGULATION SECTION 2-2(B)(2).

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF VERMONT SECURITIES REGULATION SECTION 2-2(B)(2), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED VERMONT CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $33,919.48, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $85,000, AND TO CONTRIBUTE $15,000 TO THE VERMONT FINANCIAL SERVICES EDUCATION AND VICTIM RESTITUTION SPECIAL FUND. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE, CONTRIBUTION AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No

NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL REGULATION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
10/09/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
DOCKET NO. 25-018-S
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL REGULATION ("DEPARTMENT") ALLEGED
THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD
JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE
CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS
CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF VERMONT SECURITIES REGULATION SECTION 2-2(B)(2).
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
10/09/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF VERMONT SECURITIES REGULATION SECTION 2-2(B)(2), TO PROVIDE

RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED VERMONT CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $33,919.48, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT
OF $85,000, AND TO CONTRIBUTE $15,000 TO THE VERMONT FINANCIAL SERVICES EDUCATION AND VICTIM RESTITUTION SPECIAL FUND. THE
ADMINISTRATIVE FINE, CONTRIBUTION AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON OCTOBER 9, 2025, THE DEPARTMENT ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE
EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT
INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF
VERMONT SECURITIES REGULATION SECTION 2-2(B)(2). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW,
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF VERMONT'S UNIFORM
SECURITIES ACT AND THE REGULATIONS THEREUNDER, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED VERMONT CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN
$33,919.48, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $85,000, AND TO CONTRIBUTE $15,000 TO THE VERMONT FINANCIAL SERVICES
EDUCATION AND VICTIM RESTITUTION SPECIAL FUND. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE, THE CONTRIBUTION AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER
regulatory · block 100PDF pages 231–234
Regulator name — filed text
INDIANA SECURITIES DIVISION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON OCTOBER 8, 2025, THE COMMISSIONER ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF IUSA I.C. SECTIONS 23-19-4-12(D)(9) AND IAC SECTIONS 4-7-6(D). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF IUSA I.C. SECTIONS 23- 19-4-12(D)(9) AND IAC SECTIONS 4-7-6(D)AND THE REGULATIONS THEREUNDER, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED INDIANA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $431,170.81, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER. DRP Pages
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE INDIANA SECURITIES COMMISSIONER ("COMMISSIONER") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF THE INDIANA UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT ("IUSA") SECTION V.

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF IUSA I.C. SECTIONS 23-19-4-12(D)(9) AND IAC SECTIONS 4-7-6(D), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED INDIANA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $431,170.81, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.

PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
INDIANA SECURITIES DIVISION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
10/08/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
CAUSE NO. 25-0009 CA
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE INDIANA SECURITIES COMMISSIONER ("COMMISSIONER") ALLEGED THAT,
DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES")
FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN
SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A
REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF THE INDIANA UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT ("IUSA") SECTION V.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
10/08/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF IUSA I.C. SECTIONS 23-19-4-12(D)(9) AND IAC SECTIONS 4-7-6(D), TO
PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED INDIANA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $431,170.81, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN
THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT
ORDER.

13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON OCTOBER 8, 2025, THE COMMISSIONER ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS
WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT
INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF
IUSA I.C. SECTIONS 23-19-4-12(D)(9) AND IAC SECTIONS 4-7-6(D). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF
LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF IUSA I.C. SECTIONS 23-
19-4-12(D)(9) AND IAC SECTIONS 4-7-6(D)AND THE REGULATIONS THEREUNDER, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED INDIANA CUSTOMERS IN AN
AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $431,170.81, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE
RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.

DRP Pages
regulatory · block 1PDF pages 234–235
Regulator name — filed text
UTAH DIVISION OF SECURITIES
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON OCTOBER 23, 2025, THE COMMISSIONER ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 61-1-6(2)(A)(II)(J) OF THE ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 61-1-6(2)(A)(II)(J) OF THE ACT AND THE REGULATIONS THEREUNDER, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED UTAH CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $58,049.54, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE UTAH DIVISION OF SECURITIES ("DIVISION") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF THE UTAH UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT ("ACT") SECTION 61-1-6(2)(A)(II)(J).

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 61-1-6(2)(A)(II)(J) OF THE ACT, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED UTAH CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $58,049.54, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
UTAH DIVISION OF SECURITIES
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 

10/23/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
DOCKET NO. SD-25-00-16
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE UTAH DIVISION OF SECURITIES ("DIVISION") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE
PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO
ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL
PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A
REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF THE UTAH UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT ("ACT") SECTION 61-1-6(2)(A)(II)(J).
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
10/23/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 61-1-6(2)(A)(II)(J) OF THE ACT, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO
AFFECTED UTAH CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $58,049.54, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000.
THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON OCTOBER 23, 2025, THE COMMISSIONER ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS
WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT
INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF
SECTION 61-1-6(2)(A)(II)(J) OF THE ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES
AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 61-1-6(2)(A)(II)(J) OF THE ACT AND
THE REGULATIONS THEREUNDER, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED UTAH CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $58,049.54, AND TO PAY
AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 2PDF pages 236–237
Regulator name — filed text
NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON NOVEMBER 14, 2025, THE DEPARTMENT ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 8-1103(9)(A)(XI) OF THE ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 8-1103(9)(A)(XI) OF THE ACT, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED NEBRASKA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $134,041.05, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF AMOUNT OF $10,000, INVESTIGATION COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $15,000 AND $75,000 AS A SETTLEMENT. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE, INVESTIGATION COSTS, SETTLEMENT, AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE (THE "DEPARTMENT") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 8-1103(9)(A)(XI) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF NEBRASKA (THE "ACT").

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 8-1103(9)(A)(XI) OF THE ACT, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED NEBRASKA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $134,041.05, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $10,000, INVESTIGATION COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $15,000 AND $75,000 AS A SETTLEMENT. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE, INVESTIGATION COSTS, SETTLEMENT, AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
11/14/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
FINDINGS OF FACT CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND CONSENT ORDER

5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE (THE "DEPARTMENT")
ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P.
("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY
SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES
CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 8-1103(9)(A)(XI) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF NEBRASKA (THE
"ACT").
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
11/14/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 8-1103(9)(A)(XI) OF THE ACT, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO
AFFECTED NEBRASKA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $134,041.05, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF
$10,000, INVESTIGATION COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $15,000 AND $75,000 AS A SETTLEMENT. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE, INVESTIGATION
COSTS, SETTLEMENT, AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON NOVEMBER 14, 2025, THE DEPARTMENT ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS
WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT
INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF
SECTION 8-1103(9)(A)(XI) OF THE ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES
AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 8-1103(9)(A)(XI) OF THE ACT, TO
PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED NEBRASKA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $134,041.05, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE
AMOUNT OF AMOUNT OF $10,000, INVESTIGATION COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $15,000 AND $75,000 AS A SETTLEMENT. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE,
INVESTIGATION COSTS, SETTLEMENT, AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 3PDF pages 237–239
Regulator name — filed text
STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON NOVEMBER 17, 2025, THE COMMISSIONER ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF HRS 485A-412(D)(9). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF HRS 485A-412(D)(9), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED HAWAII CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $37,407.62, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES OF THE STATE OF HAWAII (THE "COMMISSIONER") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF HAWAII REVISED STATUTES ("HRS") 485A-412(D)(9).

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF HRS 485A-412(D)(9), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED HAWAII CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $37,407.62, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.

Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
11/17/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
SEB20250011
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):

6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES OF THE STATE OF HAWAII (THE
"COMMISSIONER") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES
& CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT
REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD
JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF HAWAII REVISED STATUTES ("HRS") 485A-412(D)(9).
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
11/17/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF HRS 485A-412(D)(9), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED HAWAII
CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $37,407.62, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE
ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON NOVEMBER 17, 2025, THE COMMISSIONER ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS
WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT
INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF
HRS 485A-412(D)(9). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE
IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF HRS 485A-412(D)(9), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED
HAWAII CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $37,407.62, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE
ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 4PDF pages 239–241
Regulator name — filed text
COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES AND INSURANCE, OFFICE OF THE MONTANA STATE AUDITOR
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON NOVEMBER 18, 2025, THE COMMISSIONER ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF MCA SECTION 30-10-201(13)(K). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF MCA SECTION 30-10-201(13)(K), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED MONTANA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $67,601.53, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, TO PAY INVESTIGATION COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES AND INSURANCE, MONTANA STATE AUDITOR'S OFFICE (THE "COMMISSIONER") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF MONTANA CODE ANNOTATED ("MCA") SECTION 30- 10-201(13)(K).

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF MCA SECTION 30-10-201(13)(K), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED MONTANA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $67,601.53, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, TO PAY INVESTIGATION COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.

Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES AND INSURANCE, OFFICE OF THE MONTANA STATE AUDITOR
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
11/18/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
SEC-2025-58A
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES AND INSURANCE, MONTANA STATE AUDITOR'S

OFFICE (THE "COMMISSIONER") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"),
EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE
AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO
ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF MONTANA CODE ANNOTATED ("MCA") SECTION 30-
10-201(13)(K).
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
11/18/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS; INVESTIGATION COSTS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF MCA SECTION 30-10-201(13)(K), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED
MONTANA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $67,601.53, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, TO PAY
INVESTIGATION COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE
RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON NOVEMBER 18, 2025, THE COMMISSIONER ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS
WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT
INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF
MCA SECTION 30-10-201(13)(K). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO
THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF MCA SECTION 30-10-201(13)(K), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION
TO AFFECTED MONTANA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $67,601.53, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, TO
PAY INVESTIGATION COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE
RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 5PDF pages 241–243
Regulator name — filed text
THE IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON NOVEMBER 14, 2025, THE DIRECTOR ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF I.C. SECTION 30-14-412(D)(9). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF I.C. SECTION 30-14-412(D)(9), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED IDAHO CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $89,909.43, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE DIRECTOR OF THE IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE (THE "DIRECTOR") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF IDAHO CODE ("I.C.") SECTION 30-14-412(D)(9).

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF I.C. SECTION 30-14-412(D)(9), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED IDAHO CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $89,909.43, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 

One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
THE IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
11/14/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
SB-2025-105
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE DIRECTOR OF THE IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE (THE "DIRECTOR")
ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P.
("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY
SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES
CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF IDAHO CODE ("I.C.") SECTION 30-14-412(D)(9).

8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
11/14/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF I.C. SECTION 30-14-412(D)(9), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED
IDAHO CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $89,909.43, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE
ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON NOVEMBER 14, 2025, THE DIRECTOR ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE
EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT
INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF
I.C. SECTION 30-14-412(D)(9). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE
IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF I.C. SECTION 30-14-412(D)(9), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO
AFFECTED IDAHO CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $89,909.43, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE
ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 6O'Neal, Suzanne, ClairePDF pages 243–245
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
O'Neal, Suzanne, Claire
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)

You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
5353746
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
O'Neal, Suzanne, Claire
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:

11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 7PDF pages 245–247
Regulator name — filed text
THE ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, COMMUNITY, AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF BANKING AND SECURITIES
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON OCTOBER 27, 2025, THE COMMISSIONER ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF AS 45.56.440(D)(9) OF THE ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF AS 45.56.440(D)(9)OF THE ACT, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED ALASKA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $28,642.40, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, COMMUNITY, AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, DIVISION OF BANKING AND SECURITIES (THE "ADMINISTRATOR") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF ALASKA STATUTE ("AS") 45.56.440(D)(9) OF THE ALASKA SECURITIES ACT ("THE ACT").

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF AS 45.56.440(D)(9) OF THE ACT, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED ALASKA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $28,642.40, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 

B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
THE ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, COMMUNITY, AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF BANKING AND SECURITIES
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
10/27/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
ORDER NO. 25-61-S
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, COMMUNITY, AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT,
DIVISION OF BANKING AND SECURITIES (THE "ADMINISTRATOR") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30,
2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR
AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM
COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF ALASKA STATUTE ("AS")
45.56.440(D)(9) OF THE ALASKA SECURITIES ACT ("THE ACT").
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
10/27/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,

Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF AS 45.56.440(D)(9) OF THE ACT, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED
ALASKA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $28,642.40, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE
ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON OCTOBER 27, 2025, THE COMMISSIONER ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS
WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT
INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF AS
45.56.440(D)(9) OF THE ACT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE
IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF AS 45.56.440(D)(9)OF THE ACT, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO
AFFECTED ALASKA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $28,642.40, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE
ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 8PDF pages 247–249
Regulator name — filed text
ALABAMA SECURITIES COMMISSION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON NOVEMBER 17, 2025, THE COMMISSION ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF RULE 830-X-3-.13(1). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF RULE 830-X-3-.13(1), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED ALABAMA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $148,037.42, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, TO PAY INVESTIGATION COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE ALABAMA SECURITIES COMMISSION (THE "COMMISSION") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF RULE 830-X-3-.13(1).

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF RULE 830-X-3-.13(1), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED ALABAMA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $148,037.42, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, TO PAY INVESTIGATION COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No

NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
ALABAMA SECURITIES COMMISSION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; INVESTIGATION COSTS; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
11/17/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
CO-2025-0029
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE ALABAMA SECURITIES COMMISSION (THE "COMMISSION") ALLEGED THAT,
DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES")
FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN
SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A
REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF RULE 830-X-3-.13(1).
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
11/17/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS; INVESTIGATION COSTS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF RULE 830-X-3-.13(1), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED ALABAMA
CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $148,037.42, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, TO PAY INVESTIGATION

COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE
PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON NOVEMBER 17, 2025, THE COMMISSION ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS
WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT
INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF
RULE 830-X-3-.13(1). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE
IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF RULE 830-X-3-.13(1), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED
ALABAMA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $148,037.42, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, TO PAY
INVESTIGATION COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE
RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 9PDF pages 249–251
Regulator name — filed text
DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, INVESTOR PROTECTION UNIT
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON NOVEMBER 19, 2025, THE DIRECTOR ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF 6 DEL. C. SECTION 73-304(A)(10). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF 6 DEL. C. SECTION 73-304(A)(10), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED DELAWARE CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $30,736.41, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE DIRECTOR OF THE INVESTOR PROTECTION UNIT OF THE DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (THE "DIRECTOR") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF DELAWARE SECURITIES ACT, 6 DEL. C. SECTION 73-304(A)(10).

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF 6 DEL. C. SECTION 73-304(A)(10), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED DELAWARE CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $30,736.41, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:

SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, INVESTOR PROTECTION UNIT
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
11/19/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
ADMINISTRATIVE CONSENT ORDER
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE DIRECTOR OF THE INVESTOR PROTECTION UNIT OF THE DELAWARE
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (THE "DIRECTOR") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME
PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND
REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION
CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF DELAWARE SECURITIES ACT, 6 DEL.
C. SECTION 73-304(A)(10).
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
11/19/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF 6 DEL. C. SECTION 73-304(A)(10), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED
DELAWARE CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $30,736.41, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000. THE
ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).

ON NOVEMBER 19, 2025, THE DIRECTOR ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE
EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT
INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF 6
DEL. C. SECTION 73-304(A)(10). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO
THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF 6 DEL. C. SECTION 73-304(A)(10), TO PROVIDE
RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED DELAWARE CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $30,736.41, AND TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT
OF $100,000. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 10PDF pages 251–253
Regulator name — filed text
STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON NOVEMBER 17, 2025, THE COMMISSIONER ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF MINNESOTA STATUTE SECTION 80A.67(D)(9). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF MINNESOTA STATUTE SECTION 80A.67(D)(9), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED MINNESOTA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $261,074.01, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE MINNESOTA COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCE (THE "COMMISSIONER") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF MINNESOTA STATUTE SECTION 80A.67(D)(9).

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF MINNESOTA STATUTE SECTION 80A.67(D)(9), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED MINNESOTA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $261,074.01, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)

(
)
( )
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
11/17/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
ADMINISTRATIVE CONSENT ORDER
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE MINNESOTA COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCE (THE "COMMISSIONER") ALLEGED
THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD
JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE
CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS
CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF MINNESOTA STATUTE SECTION 80A.67(D)(9).
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
11/17/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF MINNESOTA STATUTE SECTION 80A.67(D)(9), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO
AFFECTED MINNESOTA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $261,074.01, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000,
AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS
OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON NOVEMBER 17, 2025, THE COMMISSIONER ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS
WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT
INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF
MINNESOTA STATUTE SECTION 80A.67(D)(9). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES
AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF MINNESOTA STATUTE SECTION 80A.67(D)(9), TO
PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED MINNESOTA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $261,074.01, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE

AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 11PDF pages 253–254
Regulator name — filed text
NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF STATE BUREAU OF SECURITIES REGULATION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON NOVEMBER 14, 2025, THE BUREAU ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT RSA SECTION 421-B:4-412(D)(9). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT RSA SECTION 421-B:4-412(D)(9), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED NEW HAMPSHIRE CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $63,079.49, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF STATE BUREAU OF SECURITIES REGULATION (THE "BUREAU") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT RSA SECTION 421-B:4- 412(D)(9).

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT RSA SECTION 421-B:4-412(D) (9), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED NEW HAMPSHIRE CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $63,079.49, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF STATE BUREAU OF SECURITIES REGULATION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 

11/14/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
I-2025000054
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF STATE BUREAU OF SECURITIES REGULATION
(THE "BUREAU") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES &
CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT
REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD
JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT RSA SECTION 421-B:4-
412(D)(9).
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
11/14/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT RSA SECTION 421-B:4-412(D)
(9), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED NEW HAMPSHIRE CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $63,079.49, TO PAY AN
ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND
RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON NOVEMBER 14, 2025, THE BUREAU ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE
EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT
INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF
NEW HAMPSHIRE UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT RSA SECTION 421-B:4-412(D)(9). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR
VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF NEW
HAMPSHIRE UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT RSA SECTION 421-B:4-412(D)(9), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED NEW HAMPSHIRE CUSTOMERS IN AN
AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $63,079.49, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS.
THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 12PDF pages 255–256
Regulator name — filed text
TEXAS STATE SECURITIES BOARD
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON DECEMBER 19, 2025, THE TSSB ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 115.10(A) OF THE BOARD RULES. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 115.10(A) OF THE BOARD RULES, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED TEXAS CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $1,074,395.63, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, TO PAY INVESTIGATION COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE TEXAS STATE SECURITIES BOARD (THE "TSSB") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 115.10(A) OF THE TEXAS STATE SECURITIES BOARD RULES ("BOARD RULES")PROMULGATED UNDER THE TEXAS SECURITIES ACT.

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 115.10(A) OF THE BOARD RULES, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED TEXAS CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $1,074,395.63, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, TO PAY INVESTIGATION COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
TEXAS STATE SECURITIES BOARD
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; INVESTIGATION COSTS; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
12/19/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:

LID-25-CAF-01
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE TEXAS STATE SECURITIES BOARD (THE "TSSB") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE
PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO
ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL
PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A
REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 115.10(A) OF THE TEXAS STATE SECURITIES BOARD RULES ("BOARD RULES")PROMULGATED
UNDER THE TEXAS SECURITIES ACT.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/19/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS; INVESTIGATION COSTS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 115.10(A) OF THE BOARD RULES, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO
AFFECTED TEXAS CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $1,074,395.63, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, TO
PAY INVESTIGATION COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE
RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON DECEMBER 19, 2025, THE TSSB ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE
EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT
INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF
SECTION 115.10(A) OF THE BOARD RULES. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES
AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 115.10(A) OF THE BOARD RULES, TO
PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED TEXAS CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $1,074,395.63, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE
AMOUNT OF $100,000, TO PAY INVESTIGATION COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE
ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 13PDF pages 256–258
Regulator name — filed text
ENFORCEMENT SECTION OF THE MISSOURI SECURITIES DIVISION OF THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 125,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON DECEMBER 15, 2025, THE ENFORCEMENT SECTION ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF 15 CSR 30-51.171(2)(A). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF 15 CSR 30-51.171(2)(A), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED MISSOURI CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $526,569.72, TO PAY A MONETARY FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $125,000 (THE AMOUNT PAID INCLUDES AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND INVESTIGATION COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000), AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE MONETARY FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE ENFORCEMENT SECTION OF THE MISSOURI SECURITIES DIVISION OF THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE (THE "ENFORCEMENT SECTION") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF 15 CSR 30-51.171(2) (A).

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF 15 CSR 30-51.171(2)(A), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED MISSOURI CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $526,569.72, TO PAY A MONETARY FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $125,000 TO THE MISSOURI SECRETARY OF STATE'S INVESTOR EDUCATION AND PROTECTION FUND (THE AMOUNT PAID INCLUDES AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND INVESTIGATION COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000), AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE MONETARY FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.

Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
ENFORCEMENT SECTION OF THE MISSOURI SECURITIES DIVISION OF THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
12/15/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
AP-25-08
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):

6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity - OTC
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE ENFORCEMENT SECTION OF THE MISSOURI SECURITIES DIVISION OF THE
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE (THE "ENFORCEMENT SECTION") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL
30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A
FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM
COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF 15 CSR 30-51.171(2)
(A).
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/15/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 125,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF 15 CSR 30-51.171(2)(A), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED MISSOURI
CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $526,569.72, TO PAY A MONETARY FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $125,000 TO THE MISSOURI SECRETARY
OF STATE'S INVESTOR EDUCATION AND PROTECTION FUND (THE AMOUNT PAID INCLUDES AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF
$100,000, AND INVESTIGATION COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000), AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE MONETARY FINE AND
THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON DECEMBER 15, 2025, THE ENFORCEMENT SECTION ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN
TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY
TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE
COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF 15 CSR 30-51.171(2)(A). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW,
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF 15 CSR 30-51.171(2)(A), TO
PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED MISSOURI CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $526,569.72, TO PAY A MONETARY FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF
$125,000 (THE AMOUNT PAID INCLUDES AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND INVESTIGATION COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF
$25,000), AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE MONETARY FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 14PDF pages 258–260
Regulator name — filed text
STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL PROTECTION AND INNOVATION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON FEBRUARY 20, 2026, THE COMMISSIONER ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF CALIFORNIA CORPORATIONS CODE SECTION 25218 AND CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 10, SECTION 260.218.4. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF CALIFORNIA CORPORATIONS CODE SECTION 25218 AND CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 10, SECTION 260.218.4, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED CALIFORNIA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $520,434.51, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE COMMISSIONER OF FINANCIAL PROTECTION AND INNOVATION ("COMMISSIONER") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF CALIFORNIA CORPORATIONS CODE SECTION 25218 AND CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 10, SECTION 260.218.4.

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF CALIFORNIA CORPORATIONS CODE SECTION 25218 AND CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 10, SECTION 260.218.4, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED CALIFORNIA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $520,434.51, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action

Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL PROTECTION AND INNOVATION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
02/20/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
CONSENT ORDER
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:

Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE COMMISSIONER OF FINANCIAL PROTECTION AND INNOVATION
("COMMISSIONER") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES
& CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT
REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD
JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF CALIFORNIA CORPORATIONS CODE SECTION 25218 AND
CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 10, SECTION 260.218.4.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
02/20/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF CALIFORNIA CORPORATIONS CODE SECTION 25218 AND CALIFORNIA CODE
OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 10, SECTION 260.218.4, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED CALIFORNIA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS
THAN $520,434.51, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE
ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON FEBRUARY 20, 2026, THE COMMISSIONER ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS
WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT
INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF
CALIFORNIA CORPORATIONS CODE SECTION 25218 AND CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 10, SECTION 260.218.4. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR
DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST
FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF CALIFORNIA CORPORATIONS CODE SECTION 25218 AND CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 10, SECTION
260.218.4, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED CALIFORNIA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $520,434.51, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE
FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 15PDF pages 260–262
Regulator name — filed text
COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES FOR THE STATE OF GEORGIA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON FEBRUARY 20, 2026, THE COMMISSIONER ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF GA. COMP. R. & REGS. R. 590-4-5-.12(1) AND O.C.G.A. SECTION 10-5-41(D)(9). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF GA. COMP. R. & REGS. R. 590-4-5-.12(1) AND O.C.G.A. SECTION 10-5-41(D)(9), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED GEORGIA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $384,825.28, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000 OF WHICH $20,000 WILL BE RETAINED FOR THE COST OF THE INVESTIGATION, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES FOR THE STATE OF GEORGIA (THE "COMMISSIONER") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF GA. COMP. R. & REGS. R. 590-4-5-.12(1) AND O.C.G.A. SECTION 10-5- 41(D)(9).

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF GA. COMP. R. & REGS. R. 590-4-5-.12(1) AND O.C.G.A. SECTION 10-5-41(D) (9), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED GEORGIA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $384,825.28, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000 OF WHICH $20,000 WILL BE RETAINED FOR THE COST OF THE INVESTIGATION, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)

11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES FOR THE STATE OF GEORGIA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
02/20/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
ENSC-251262
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 

7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES FOR THE STATE OF GEORGIA (THE
"COMMISSIONER") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES
& CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT
REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD
JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF GA. COMP. R. & REGS. R. 590-4-5-.12(1) AND O.C.G.A. SECTION 10-5-
41(D)(9).
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
02/20/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF GA. COMP. R. & REGS. R. 590-4-5-.12(1) AND O.C.G.A. SECTION 10-5-41(D)
(9), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED GEORGIA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $384,825.28, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE
IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000 OF WHICH $20,000 WILL BE RETAINED FOR THE COST OF THE INVESTIGATION, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN
UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON FEBRUARY 20, 2026, THE COMMISSIONER ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS
WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT
INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF
GA. COMP. R. & REGS. R. 590-4-5-.12(1) AND O.C.G.A. SECTION 10-5-41(D)(9). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR
VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF GA.
COMP. R. & REGS. R. 590-4-5-.12(1) AND O.C.G.A. SECTION 10-5-41(D)(9), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED GEORGIA CUSTOMERS IN AN
AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $384,825.28, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000 OF WHICH $20,000 WILL BE RETAINED FOR THE
COST OF THE INVESTIGATION, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 16PDF pages 262–264
Regulator name — filed text
MISSISSIPPI SECRETARY OF STATE SECURITIES DIVISION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON FEBRUARY 20, 2026, THE COMMISSIONER ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF MISS CODE ANN. SECTION 75-71-412(D)(9). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF MISS CODE ANN. SECTION 75-71-412(D)(9), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED MISSISSIPPI CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $82,132.41, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ("ADMINISTRATOR") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF MISSISSIPPI CODE ANNOTATED SECTION 75-71-412(D)(9).

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF MISS CODE ANN. SECTION 75-71-412(D)(9), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED MISSISSIPPI CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $82,132.41, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.

Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
MISSISSIPPI SECRETARY OF STATE SECURITIES DIVISION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
02/20/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
LS-25-8149
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ("ADMINISTRATOR")

ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P.
("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY
SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES
CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF MISSISSIPPI CODE ANNOTATED SECTION 75-71-412(D)(9).
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
02/20/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF MISS CODE ANN. SECTION 75-71-412(D)(9), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO
AFFECTED MISSISSIPPI CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $82,132.41, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000,
AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON FEBRUARY 20, 2026, THE COMMISSIONER ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS
WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT
INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF
MISS CODE ANN. SECTION 75-71-412(D)(9). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES
AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF MISS CODE ANN. SECTION 75-71-412(D)(9), TO
PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED MISSISSIPPI CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $82,132.41, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE
AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 17PDF pages 264–266
Regulator name — filed text
PUERTO RICO OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON FEBRUARY 24, 2026, THE OCFI ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 204(A)(2)(J) OF THE PRUSA. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 204(A)(2)(J) OF THE PRUSA, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED PUERTO RICO CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $498.48, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE COMMISSIONER OF THE PUERTO RICO OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ("OCFI") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 204(A)(2)(J) OF THE PUERTO RICO UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT ("PRUSA").

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 204(A)(2)(J) OF THE PRUSA, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED PUERTO RICO CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $489.48, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 

One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
PUERTO RICO OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
02/24/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
CONSENT ORDER
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE COMMISSIONER OF THE PUERTO RICO OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ("OCFI") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"),
EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE
AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO
ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 204(A)(2)(J) OF THE PUERTO RICO
UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT ("PRUSA").

8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
02/24/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 204(A)(2)(J) OF THE PRUSA, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO
AFFECTED PUERTO RICO CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $489.48, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000,
AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON FEBRUARY 24, 2026, THE OCFI ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE
EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT
INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF
SECTION 204(A)(2)(J) OF THE PRUSA. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED
TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 204(A)(2)(J) OF THE PRUSA, TO PROVIDE
RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED PUERTO RICO CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $498.48, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF
$100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 18PDF pages 266–268
Regulator name — filed text
ILLINOIS SECRETARY OF STATE SECURITIES DEPARTMENT
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON FEBRUARY 20, 2026, THE SECURITIES DEPARTMENT ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 8.E.1.E.IV OF THE ILLINOIS SECURITIES LAW. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 8.E.1.E.IV OF THE ILLINOIS SECURITIES LAW, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED ILLINOIS CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $654,428.95, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE ILLINOIS SECRETARY OF STATE SECURITIES DEPARTMENT (THE "SECURITIES DEPARTMENT") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 8.E.1.E.IV OF THE ILLINOIS SECURITIES LAW.

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 8.E.1.E.IV OF THE ILLINOIS SECURITIES LAW, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED ILLINOIS CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $654,428.95, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I

A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
ILLINOIS SECRETARY OF STATE SECURITIES DEPARTMENT
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
02/20/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
FILE NO.: 2500298
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE ILLINOIS SECRETARY OF STATE SECURITIES DEPARTMENT (THE "SECURITIES
DEPARTMENT") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES &
CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT
REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD
JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 8.E.1.E.IV OF THE ILLINOIS SECURITIES LAW.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:

If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
02/20/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 8.E.1.E.IV OF THE ILLINOIS SECURITIES LAW, TO PROVIDE
RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED ILLINOIS CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $654,428.95, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT
OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON FEBRUARY 20, 2026, THE SECURITIES DEPARTMENT ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN
TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY
TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE
COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 8.E.1.E.IV OF THE ILLINOIS SECURITIES LAW. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS
OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF
SECTION 8.E.1.E.IV OF THE ILLINOIS SECURITIES LAW, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED ILLINOIS CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN
$654,428.95, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE
FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 19PDF pages 268–270
Regulator name — filed text
SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON FEBRUARY 25, 2026, THE COMMISSIONER ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF S.C. CODE ANN. SECTION 35-1-412(D)(9). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF S.C. CODE ANN. SECTION 35-1-412(D)(9), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED SOUTH CAROLINA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $321,397.88, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF SOUTH CAROLINA ("COMMISSIONER") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF S.C. CODE ANN. SECTION 35-1-412(D)(9).

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF S.C. CODE ANN. SECTION 35-1-412(D)(9), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED SOUTH CAROLINA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $321,397.88, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates

y
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF SOUTH CAROLINA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
02/25/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
MATTER NO. 20252027
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE SECURITIES COMMISSIONER OF SOUTH CAROLINA ("COMMISSIONER")
ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P.
("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY
SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES
CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF S.C. CODE ANN. SECTION 35-1-412(D)(9).
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:

Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
02/25/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF S.C. CODE ANN. SECTION 35-1-412(D)(9), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO
AFFECTED SOUTH CAROLINA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $321,397.88, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF
$100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON FEBRUARY 25, 2026, THE COMMISSIONER ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS
WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT
INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF
S.C. CODE ANN. SECTION 35-1-412(D)(9). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES
AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF S.C. CODE ANN. SECTION 35-1-412(D)(9), TO
PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED SOUTH CAROLINA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $321,397.88, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN
THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 20PDF pages 270–272
Regulator name — filed text
WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION OF SECURITIES
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON MARCH 4, 2026, THE DIVISION ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF WIS. ADMIN. CODE SECTION DFI-SEC 4.05(2). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF WIS. ADMIN. CODE SECTION DFI-SEC 4.05(2), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED WISCONSIN CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $334,797.49, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE WISCONSIN DIVISION OF SECURITIES (THE "DIVISION") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF WIS. ADMIN. CODE SECTION DFI-SEC 4.05(2).

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF WIS. ADMIN. CODE SECTION DFI-SEC 4.05(2), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED WISCONSIN CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $334,797.49, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.

ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION OF SECURITIES
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
03/04/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
DFI CASE NO. S-251169 (LX)
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE WISCONSIN DIVISION OF SECURITIES (THE "DIVISION") ALLEGED THAT,
DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES")
FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN
SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A
REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF WIS. ADMIN. CODE SECTION DFI-SEC 4.05(2).
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
03/04/2026
 Exact
 Explanation

If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF WIS. ADMIN. CODE SECTION DFI-SEC 4.05(2), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO
AFFECTED WISCONSIN CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $334,797.49, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000,
AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON MARCH 4, 2026, THE DIVISION ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE
EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT
INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF
WIS. ADMIN. CODE SECTION DFI-SEC 4.05(2). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES
AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF WIS. ADMIN. CODE SECTION DFI-SEC 4.05(2),
TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED WISCONSIN CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $334,797.49, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN
THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 21PDF pages 272–274
Regulator name — filed text
LOUISIANA OFFICE OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON APRIL 9, 2026, LOFI ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF LOUISIANA SECURITIES LAW SECTION 51:704(A)(9) AND LAC 10:XIII.1901. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF LOUISIANA SECURITIES LAW SECTION 51:704(A)(9) AND LAC 10:XIII.1901, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED LOUISIANA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $180,147.98, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE LOUISIANA OFFICE OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ("LOFI") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF LOUISIANA SECURITIES LAW SECTION 51:704(A)(9) AND LOUISIANA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE ("LAC") 10:XIII.1901.

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF LOUISIANA SECURITIES LAW SECTION 51:704(A)(9) AND LAC 10:XIII.1901, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED LOUISIANA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $180,147.98, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.

This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
LOUISIANA OFFICE OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
04/09/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
MATTER NO. OFI-2025-02
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE LOUISIANA OFFICE OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ("LOFI") ALLEGED THAT,
DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES")
FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN
SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A
REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF LOUISIANA SECURITIES LAW SECTION 51:704(A)(9) AND LOUISIANA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE ("LAC")
10:XIII.1901.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
04/09/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:

A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF LOUISIANA SECURITIES LAW SECTION 51:704(A)(9) AND LAC 10:XIII.1901,
TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED LOUISIANA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $180,147.98, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE
IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON APRIL 9, 2026, LOFI ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A
FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM
COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF LOUISIANA SECURITIES
LAW SECTION 51:704(A)(9) AND LAC 10:XIII.1901. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD
JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF LOUISIANA SECURITIES LAW SECTION
51:704(A)(9) AND LAC 10:XIII.1901, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED LOUISIANA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $180,147.98, TO
PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE
RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 22PDF pages 274–276
Regulator name — filed text
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, SECURITIES AND BANKING
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON MARCH 26, 2026, THE DEPARTMENT ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF D.C. OFFICIAL CODE SECTION 31-5602.07(A)(12). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF D.C. OFFICIAL CODE SECTION 31- 5602.07(A)(12), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $8,783.59, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, SECURITIES AND BANKING (THE "DEPARTMENT") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF D.C. OFFICIAL CODE SECTION 31-5602.07(A)(12).

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF D.C. OFFICIAL CODE SECTION 31-5602.07(A)(12), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $8,783.59, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.

If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, SECURITIES AND BANKING
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
03/26/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
ORDER NO: SB-CO-06-25
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, SECURITIES AND
BANKING (THE "DEPARTMENT") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"),
EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE
AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO
ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF D.C. OFFICIAL CODE SECTION 31-5602.07(A)(12).
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
03/26/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction

 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF D.C. OFFICIAL CODE SECTION 31-5602.07(A)(12), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION
TO AFFECTED DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $8,783.59, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT
OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON MARCH 26, 2026, THE DEPARTMENT ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE
EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT
INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF
D.C. OFFICIAL CODE SECTION 31-5602.07(A)(12). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD
JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF D.C. OFFICIAL CODE SECTION 31-
5602.07(A)(12), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $8,783.59, TO PAY AN
ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE
RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 23PDF pages 276–278
Regulator name — filed text
SECURITIES DIVISION OF THE OFFICE OF THE NEVADA SECRETARY OF STATE
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON APRIL 1, 2026, THE DIVISION ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF NRS 90.420(1)(1). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF NRS 90.420(1)(1), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED NEVADA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $66,759.57, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE SECURITIES DIVISION OF THE OFFICE OF THE NEVADA SECRETARY OF STATE (THE "DIVISION") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF NRS 90.420(1)(1) OF THE NEVADA UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT.

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF NRS 90.420(1)(1), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED NEVADA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $66,759.57, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the

circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
SECURITIES DIVISION OF THE OFFICE OF THE NEVADA SECRETARY OF STATE
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
04/01/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
FILE NO. INV25-163
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE SECURITIES DIVISION OF THE OFFICE OF THE NEVADA SECRETARY OF STATE
(THE "DIVISION") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES &
CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT
REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD
JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF NRS 90.420(1)(1) OF THE NEVADA UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
04/01/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,

Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF NRS 90.420(1)(1), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED NEVADA
CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $66,759.57, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH
CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT
ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON APRIL 1, 2026, THE DIVISION ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE
EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT
INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF
NRS 90.420(1)(1). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION
OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF NRS 90.420(1)(1), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED NEVADA
CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $66,759.57, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH
CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 24PDF pages 278–280
Regulator name — filed text
KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON APRIL 13, 2026, THE DEPARTMENT ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF 808 KAR 10:030, SECTIONS 3 AND 4(1). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF 808 KAR 10:030, SECTIONS 3 AND 4(1), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED KENTUCKY CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $181,263.55, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS (THE "DEPARTMENT") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF 808 KENTUCKY ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS ("KAR") 10:030, SECTIONS 3 AND 4(1).

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF 808 KAR 10:030, SECTIONS 3 AND 4(1), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED KENTUCKY CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $181,263.55, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No

NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
04/13/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
2025-DFI-0145
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS (THE "DEPARTMENT")
ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P.
("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY
SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES
CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF 808 KENTUCKY ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS ("KAR") 10:030, SECTIONS 3
AND 4(1).
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
04/13/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A

CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF 808 KAR 10:030, SECTIONS 3 AND 4(1), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO
AFFECTED KENTUCKY CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $181,263.55, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000,
AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON APRIL 13, 2026, THE DEPARTMENT ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE
EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT
INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF
808 KAR 10:030, SECTIONS 3 AND 4(1). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES
AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF 808 KAR 10:030, SECTIONS 3 AND 4(1), TO
PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED KENTUCKY CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $181,263.55, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE
AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 25PDF pages 280–282
Regulator name — filed text
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON MAY 5, 2026, THE DEPARTMENT ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF WAC 460-20C-150(1)(E). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF WAC 460-20C-150(1)(E), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED WASHINGTON CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $361,844.96, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, TO PAY INVESTIGATION COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND INVESTIGATION COSTS WERE PAID ON MAY 5, 2026, AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS SECURITIES DIVISION (THE "DIVISION") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF WAC 460-20C-150(1)(E).

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF WAC 460-20C-150(1)(E), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED WASHINGTON CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $361,844.96, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, TO PAY INVESTIGATION COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND INVESTIGATION COSTS WERE PAID ON MAY 5, 2026, AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.

PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; INVESTIGATION COSTS; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
05/05/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
ORDER NO. S-25-3996-25-CO01
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS SECURITIES
DIVISION (THE "DIVISION") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD
D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID
NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE
EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF WAC 460-20C-150(1)(E).
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
05/05/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS; INVESTIGATION COSTS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF WAC 460-20C-150(1)(E), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED
WASHINGTON CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $361,844.96, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, TO PAY
INVESTIGATION COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND
INVESTIGATION COSTS WERE PAID ON MAY 5, 2026, AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT
ORDER.

13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON MAY 5, 2026, THE DEPARTMENT ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE
EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT
INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF
WAC 460-20C-150(1)(E). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE
IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF WAC 460-20C-150(1)(E), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO
AFFECTED WASHINGTON CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $361,844.96, TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, TO
PAY INVESTIGATION COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AND
INVESTIGATION COSTS WERE PAID ON MAY 5, 2026, AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 26PDF pages 282–284
Regulator name — filed text
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE, SECURITIES DIVISION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON MAY 12, 2026, THE SECURITIES DIVISION ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF N.C. GEN. STAT. SECTION 78A-39(A1). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF N.C. GEN. STAT. SECTION 78A-39(A1), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED NORTH CAROLINA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $579,290.41, TO PAY A MONETARY FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000 (THE AMOUNT PAID INCLUDES A CIVIL PENALTY OF $10,000, AND INVESTIGATION COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $90,000), AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE MONETARY FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE, SECURITIES DIVISION (THE "SECURITIES DIVISION") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF N.C. GEN. STAT. SECTION 78A- 39(A1).

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF N.C. GEN. STAT. SECTION 78A-39(A1)., TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED NORTH CAROLINA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $579,290.41, TO PAY A MONETARY FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000 (THE AMOUNT PAID INCLUDES A CIVIL PENALTY OF $10,000, AND INVESTIGATION COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $90,000), AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE MONETARY FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE, SECURITIES DIVISION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
05/12/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
FINAL ORDER 25ADM002
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE, SECURITIES
DIVISION (THE "SECURITIES DIVISION") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME
PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND
REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION
CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF N.C. GEN. STAT. SECTION 78A-
39(A1).
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
05/12/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF N.C. GEN. STAT. SECTION 78A-39(A1)., TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO
AFFECTED NORTH CAROLINA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $579,290.41, TO PAY A MONETARY FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000
(THE AMOUNT PAID INCLUDES A CIVIL PENALTY OF $10,000, AND INVESTIGATION COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $90,000), AND TO COMPLY WITH
CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE MONETARY FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON MAY 12, 2026, THE SECURITIES DIVISION ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS

WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT
INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF
N.C. GEN. STAT. SECTION 78A-39(A1). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED
TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF N.C. GEN. STAT. SECTION 78A-39(A1), TO PROVIDE
RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED NORTH CAROLINA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $579,290.41, TO PAY A MONETARY FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF
$100,000 (THE AMOUNT PAID INCLUDES A CIVIL PENALTY OF $10,000, AND INVESTIGATION COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $90,000), AND TO COMPLY
WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE MONETARY FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 27PDF pages 284–286
Regulator name — filed text
STATE OF MAINE OFFICE OF SECURITIES
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON JUNE 5, 2026, THE ADMINISTRATOR ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF 32 M.R.S. SECTION 16412(4)(I) AND MAINE OFFICE OF SECURITIES RULE CHAPTER 504 SECTION 7(1). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF 32 M.R.S. SECTION 16412(4)(I) AND MAINE OFFICE OF SECURITIES RULE CHAPTER 504 SECTION 7(1), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED MAINE CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $39,855.49, TO PAY A MONETARY FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE MONETARY FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE MAINE SECURITIES ADMINISTRATOR (THE "ADMINISTRATOR") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF 32 M.R.S. SECTION 16412(4)(I) AND MAINE OFFICE OF SECURITIES RULE CHAPTER 504 SECTION 7(1).

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF 32 M.R.S. SECTION 16412(4)(I) AND MAINE OFFICE OF SECURITIES RULE CHAPTER 504 SECTION 7(1), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED MAINE CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $39,855.49, TO PAY A MONETARY FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE MONETARY FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
STATE OF MAINE OFFICE OF SECURITIES
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)

Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
06/05/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
CONSENT ORDER NO. 2026-07
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE MAINE SECURITIES ADMINISTRATOR (THE "ADMINISTRATOR") ALLEGED THAT,
DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES")
FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN
SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A
REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF 32 M.R.S. SECTION 16412(4)(I) AND MAINE OFFICE OF SECURITIES RULE CHAPTER 504 SECTION 7(1).
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
06/05/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF 32 M.R.S. SECTION 16412(4)(I) AND MAINE OFFICE OF SECURITIES RULE
CHAPTER 504 SECTION 7(1), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED MAINE CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $39,855.49, TO PAY A
MONETARY FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE MONETARY FINE AND THE RESTITUTION
WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON JUNE 5, 2026, THE ADMINISTRATOR ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE
EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT
INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF 32
M.R.S. SECTION 16412(4)(I) AND MAINE OFFICE OF SECURITIES RULE CHAPTER 504 SECTION 7(1). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT
OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION
OF 32 M.R.S. SECTION 16412(4)(I) AND MAINE OFFICE OF SECURITIES RULE CHAPTER 504 SECTION 7(1), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED

MAINE CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $39,855.49, TO PAY A MONETARY FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH
CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE MONETARY FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 28PDF pages 286–287
Regulator name — filed text
STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON JUNE 17, 2026, THE OFFICE ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF RULE 69W-600.013(1)(H)1.,FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF RULE 69W-600.013(1) (H)1.,FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED FLORIDA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $589,389.76, TO PAY A MONETARY FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE MONETARY FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION (THE "OFFICE") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF RULE 69W-600.013(1)(H)1.,FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE.

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF RULE 69W-600.013(1)(H)1.,FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED FLORIDA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $589,389.76, TO PAY A MONETARY FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE MONETARY FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 

06/17/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
CASE NUMBER: 130174-S
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION (THE "OFFICE")
ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P.
("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY
SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES
CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF RULE 69W-600.013(1)(H)1.,FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
06/17/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF RULE 69W-600.013(1)(H)1.,FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, TO PROVIDE
RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED FLORIDA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $589,389.76, TO PAY A MONETARY FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF
$100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE MONETARY FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON JUNE 17, 2026, THE OFFICE ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE
EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT
INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF
RULE 69W-600.013(1)(H)1.,FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW,
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF RULE 69W-600.013(1)
(H)1.,FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED FLORIDA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $589,389.76, TO
PAY A MONETARY FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE MONETARY FINE AND THE RESTITUTION
WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 29PDF pages 288–289
Regulator name — filed text
FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 125,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON JUNE 16 2026, THE FIRM BECAME SUBJECT TO AN AWC ISSUED BY FINRA REGARDING THE ALLEGATIONS DISCUSSED IN RESPONSE TO ITEM 7. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS IN THE AWC, THE FIRM AGREED TO BE CENSURED, PAY A $125,000 FINE AND COMPLETE CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE FINE WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE AWC.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

THE FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY ("FINRA") ALLEGED THAT EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES" OR THE "FIRM") FAILED (1) TO REPORT CERTAIN FRACTIONAL SHARE LIQUIDATIONS TO THE FINRA/NASDAQ TRADE REPORTING FACILITY OR THE OVER-THE-COUNTER REPORTING FACILITY IN VIOLATION OF FINRA RULES 6380A, 6622 AND 2010; AND (2) FAILED TO ESTABLISH, MAINTAIN AND ENFORCE A SUPERVISORY SYSTEM, INCLUDING WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES, REASONABLY DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH ITS TRADE REPORTING OBLIGATIONS FOR FRACTIONAL SHARE TRADES, IN VIOLATION OF FINRA RULES 3110(A) AND (B) AND 2010.

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS IN THE AWC, THE FIRM AGREED TO BE CENSURED, PAY A $125,000 FINE AND COMPLETE CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE FINE WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE AWC.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
CENSURE; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
06/16/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
NO. 2020067346401

5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
FRACTIONAL SHARES
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY ("FINRA") ALLEGED THAT EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES" OR THE "FIRM") FAILED
(1) TO REPORT CERTAIN FRACTIONAL SHARE LIQUIDATIONS TO THE FINRA/NASDAQ TRADE REPORTING FACILITY OR THE OVER-THE-COUNTER
REPORTING FACILITY IN VIOLATION OF FINRA RULES 6380A, 6622 AND 2010; AND (2) FAILED TO ESTABLISH, MAINTAIN AND ENFORCE A SUPERVISORY
SYSTEM, INCLUDING WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES, REASONABLY DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH ITS TRADE REPORTING OBLIGATIONS FOR
FRACTIONAL SHARE TRADES, IN VIOLATION OF FINRA RULES 3110(A) AND (B) AND 2010.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
06/16/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 125,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS IN THE AWC, THE FIRM AGREED TO BE CENSURED, PAY A $125,000 FINE AND COMPLETE
CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE FINE WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE AWC.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON JUNE 16 2026, THE FIRM BECAME SUBJECT TO AN AWC ISSUED BY FINRA REGARDING THE ALLEGATIONS DISCUSSED IN RESPONSE TO ITEM 7.
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS IN THE AWC, THE FIRM AGREED TO BE CENSURED, PAY A $125,000 FINE AND COMPLETE CERTAIN
UNDERTAKINGS. THE FINE WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE AWC.
regulatory · block 30PDF pages 289–291
Regulator name — filed text
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS, CORPORATIONS, SECURITIES, AND COMMERCIAL LICENSING BUREAU
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON JUNE 5, 2026, THE BUREAU ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF MCL 451.2412(4)(I). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF MCL 451.2412(4)(I), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED MICHIGAN CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $397,295.72, TO PAY A MONETARY FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE MONETARY FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS, CORPORATIONS, SECURITIES, AND COMMERCIAL LICENSING BUREAU (THE "BUREAU") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF MCL 451.2412(4)(I).

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF MCL 451.2412(4)(I), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED MICHIGAN CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $397,295.72, TO PAY A MONETARY FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE MONETARY FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.

Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS, CORPORATIONS, SECURITIES, AND COMMERCIAL LICENSING BUREAU
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
06/05/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
ENF-25-020116
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS,
CORPORATIONS, SECURITIES, AND COMMERCIAL LICENSING BUREAU (THE "BUREAU") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1,
2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE

EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT
INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF
MCL 451.2412(4)(I).
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
06/05/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF MCL 451.2412(4)(I), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED MICHIGAN
CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $397,295.72, TO PAY A MONETARY FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH
CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE MONETARY FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON JUNE 5, 2026, THE BUREAU ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE
EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT
INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF
MCL 451.2412(4)(I). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE
IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF MCL 451.2412(4)(I), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED
MICHIGAN CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $397,295.72, TO PAY A MONETARY FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH
CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE MONETARY FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 31PDF pages 291–293
Regulator name — filed text
NORTH DAKOTA INSURANCE AND SECURITIES DEPARTMENT
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON JUNE 26, 2026, THE COMMISSIONER ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF N.D.C.C SECTION 10-04-11(1)(M). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF N.D.C.C SECTION 10-04-11(1)(M), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED NORTH DAKOTA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $46,425.80, TO PAY A MONETARY FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE MONETARY FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE NORTH DAKOTA INSURANCE COMMISSIONER (THE "COMMISSIONER") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF N.D.C.C SECTION 10-04-11(1)(M).

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF N.D.C.C SECTION 10-04-11(1)(M), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED NORTH DAKOTA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $46,425.80, TO PAY A MONETARY FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE MONETARY FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.

PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
NORTH DAKOTA INSURANCE AND SECURITIES DEPARTMENT
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
06/26/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
CASE NUMBER: SO-25-908
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE NORTH DAKOTA INSURANCE COMMISSIONER (THE "COMMISSIONER") ALLEGED
THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD
JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE
CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS
CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF N.D.C.C SECTION 10-04-11(1)(M).
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final

9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
06/26/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF N.D.C.C SECTION 10-04-11(1)(M), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED
NORTH DAKOTA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $46,425.80, TO PAY A MONETARY FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO
COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE MONETARY FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE
CONSENT ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON JUNE 26, 2026, THE COMMISSIONER ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE
EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT
INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF
N.D.C.C SECTION 10-04-11(1)(M). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO
THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF N.D.C.C SECTION 10-04-11(1)(M), TO PROVIDE
RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED NORTH DAKOTA CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $46,425.80, TO PAY A MONETARY FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF
$100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE MONETARY FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 32PDF pages 293–295
Regulator name — filed text
SECURITIES DIVISION OF THE SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 50,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON JUNE 16, 2026, THE DIVISION ALLEGED THAT, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE ONE OF ITS INVESTMENT ADVISER REPRESENTATIVES WAS PROPERLY REGISTERED WITH MASSACHUSETTS, IN VIOLATION OF M.G.L. C. 110A, SECTION 201(D)(II). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF M.G.L. C. 110A AND THE REGULATIONS PROMULGATED THEREUNDER AT 950 CRM 10.00-14.413, TO PAY A MONETARY FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $50,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE MONETARY FINE HAS BEEN PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY THE REGISTRATION, INSPECTIONS, COMPLIANCE, AND EXAMINATIONS ("RICE") SECTION OF THE SECURITIES DIVISION OF THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS (THE "DIVISION"), THE DIVISION ALLEGED THAT, EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE THAT ONE OF ITS INVESTMENT ADVISER REPRESENTATIVES WAS PROPERLY REGISTERED WITH MASSACHUSETTS, IN VIOLATION OF M.G.L. C. 110A, SECTION 201(D)(II).

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF M.G.L. C. 110A AND THE REGULATIONS PROMULGATED THEREUNDER AT 950 CRM 10.00-14.413, TO PAY A MONETARY FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $50,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE MONETARY FINE WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates

One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
SECURITIES DIVISION OF THE SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
06/16/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
DOCKET NO. R-2026-1072
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY THE REGISTRATION, INSPECTIONS, COMPLIANCE, AND EXAMINATIONS ("RICE") SECTION OF
THE SECURITIES DIVISION OF THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS (THE "DIVISION"), THE DIVISION
ALLEGED THAT, EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE THAT ONE OF ITS INVESTMENT ADVISER REPRESENTATIVES WAS
PROPERLY REGISTERED WITH MASSACHUSETTS, IN VIOLATION OF M.G.L. C. 110A, SECTION 201(D)(II).
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent

11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
06/16/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 50,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
REVIEW WRITTEN SUPERVISORY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF M.G.L. C. 110A AND THE REGULATIONS PROMULGATED THEREUNDER AT 950
CRM 10.00-14.413, TO PAY A MONETARY FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $50,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE MONETARY FINE
WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON JUNE 16, 2026, THE DIVISION ALLEGED THAT, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE ONE OF ITS INVESTMENT ADVISER REPRESENTATIVES WAS
PROPERLY REGISTERED WITH MASSACHUSETTS, IN VIOLATION OF M.G.L. C. 110A, SECTION 201(D)(II). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE
STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT
IN VIOLATION OF M.G.L. C. 110A AND THE REGULATIONS PROMULGATED THEREUNDER AT 950 CRM 10.00-14.413, TO PAY A MONETARY FINE IN THE
AMOUNT OF $50,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE MONETARY FINE HAS BEEN PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE
CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 33PDF pages 295–297
Regulator name — filed text
STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND INSURANCE
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 5,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON AUGUST 24, 2026, THE COMMISSIONER ALLEGED THAT, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO REPORT A CONSENT ORDER ISSUED ON JANUARY 8, 2025 BY THE NJBOS TO THE COMMISSIONER, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DISCIPLINARY ACTION, IN VIOLATION OF N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40A(2) AND (19). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40A(2) AND (19), AND TO PAY A MONETARY FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,000. THE MONETARY FINE WAS PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER ON JULY 20, 2026.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

THE COMMISSIONER OF BANKING AND INSURANCE (THE "COMMISSIONER"), STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ALLEGED THAT, EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO REPORT A CONSENT ORDER ISSUED ON JANUARY 8, 2025 BY THE NEW JERSEY BUREAU OF SECURITIES ("NJBOS") TO THE COMMISSIONER, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DISCIPLINARY ACTION, IN VIOLATION OF N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40A(2) AND (19).

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40A(2) AND (19), AND TO PAY A MONETARY FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,000. THE MONETARY FINE WAS PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER ON JULY 20, 2026.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed

This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND INSURANCE
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
CEASE AND DESIST
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/24/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
ORDER NUMBER: E26-96
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE COMMISSIONER OF BANKING AND INSURANCE (THE "COMMISSIONER"), STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ALLEGED THAT, EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P.
("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO REPORT A CONSENT ORDER ISSUED ON JANUARY 8, 2025 BY THE NEW JERSEY BUREAU OF SECURITIES ("NJBOS") TO THE
COMMISSIONER, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DISCIPLINARY ACTION, IN VIOLATION OF N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40A(2) AND (19).
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
08/24/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 5,000.00

 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM
CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40A(2) AND (19), AND TO PAY A MONETARY FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,000. THE MONETARY FINE
WAS PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER ON JULY 20, 2026.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON AUGUST 24, 2026, THE COMMISSIONER ALLEGED THAT, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO REPORT A CONSENT ORDER ISSUED ON JANUARY 8, 2025 BY THE
NJBOS TO THE COMMISSIONER, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DISCIPLINARY ACTION, IN VIOLATION OF N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40A(2) AND (19). WITHOUT
ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN
VIOLATION OF N.J.S.A. 17:22A-40A(2) AND (19), AND TO PAY A MONETARY FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,000. THE MONETARY FINE WAS PAID IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER ON JULY 20, 2026.
regulatory · block 34PDF pages 297–299
Regulator name — filed text
KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, SECURITIES DIVISION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON AUGUST 20, 2026, THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF K.A.R. 81-3-7(A)(4) AND K.S.A. 17-12A412(D)(9). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF K.A.R. 81- 3-7(A)(4) AND K.S.A. 17-12A412(D)(9), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED KANSAS CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $186,475.73, TO PAY A MONETARY FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE MONETARY FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SECURITIES DIVISION ("ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF K.A.R. 81-3-7(A)(4) AND K.S.A. 17- 12A412(D)(9).
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to

y
g
g
y
y
y
(
)
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, SECURITIES DIVISION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/20/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
DOCKET NO.: 27E016, KSC NO.: 2027-7597
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SECURITIES
DIVISION ("ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME
PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND
REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION
CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF K.A.R. 81-3-7(A)(4) AND K.S.A. 17-
12A412(D)(9).
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
08/20/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of

g
g
y
p
p
p
g
y
y
p
y p
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF K.A.R. 81-3-7(A)(4) AND K.S.A. 17-12A412(D)(9), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION
TO AFFECTED KANSAS CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $186,475.73, TO PAY A MONETARY FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO
COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE MONETARY FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE
CONSENT ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON AUGUST 20, 2026, THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN
TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY
TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE
COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF K.A.R. 81-3-7(A)(4) AND K.S.A. 17-12A412(D)(9). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR
VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF K.A.R. 81-
3-7(A)(4) AND K.S.A. 17-12A412(D)(9), TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED KANSAS CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $186,475.73, TO
PAY A MONETARY FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE MONETARY FINE AND THE RESTITUTION
WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 35PDF pages 299–301
Regulator name — filed text
THE COLORADO DIVISION OF SECURITIES
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

EDWARD JONES WAS NOTIFIED ON SEPTEMBER 22, 2026 THAT COLORADO ENTERED AN ORDER. THE DIVISION ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 11-51-410(1)(I), C.R.S. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 11-51-410(1)(I), C.R.S., TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED COLORADO CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $231,455.29, TO PAY A MONETARY FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE MONETARY FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE COLORADO DIVISION OF SECURITIES ("THE DIVISION") ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES") FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 11-51-410(1)(I), C.R.S.

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 11-51-410(1)(I), C.R.S., TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED COLORADO CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $231,455.29, TO PAY A MONETARY FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE MONETARY FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No

NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
THE COLORADO DIVISION OF SECURITIES
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION; CENSURE; CEASE AND DESIST; AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
09/22/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
SEPTEMBER 22 WAS THE DATE THE FIRM RECEIVED THE EXECUTED ORDER.
4.
Docket/Case Number:
2025-CDS-034
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH AN INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY A MULTISTATE TASK FORCE COORDINATED AMONG CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE NORTH
AMERICAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION ("NASAA"), THE COLORADO DIVISION OF SECURITIES ("THE DIVISION") ALLEGED THAT,
DURING THE PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY MAY 1, 2020 TO APRIL 30, 2025 (THE "TIME PERIOD"), EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. ("EDWARD JONES")
FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY SUPERVISE CERTAIN
SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A
REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 11-51-410(1)(I), C.R.S.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
09/22/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
SEPTEMBER 22 WAS THE DATE THE FIRM RECEIVED THE EXECUTED ORDER.
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A
CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 11-51-410(1)(I), C.R.S., TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED

COLORADO CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN $231,455.29, TO PAY A MONETARY FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY
WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE MONETARY FINE AND THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT
ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
EDWARD JONES WAS NOTIFIED ON SEPTEMBER 22, 2026 THAT COLORADO ENTERED AN ORDER. THE DIVISION ALLEGED THAT, DURING THE TIME
PERIOD, EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS WERE EXECUTED AT A FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE AND DID NOT REASONABLY
SUPERVISE CERTAIN SMALL PRINCIPAL EQUITY TRANSACTIONS THAT INCLUDED MINIMUM COMMISSION CHARGES TO ENSURE EDWARD JONES
CHARGED ITS CUSTOMERS A REASONABLE COMMISSION, IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 11-51-410(1)(I), C.R.S. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE
STATEMENT OF FACTS OR VIOLATIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO THE IMPOSITION OF A CENSURE, TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM CONDUCT
IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 11-51-410(1)(I), C.R.S., TO PROVIDE RESTITUTION TO AFFECTED COLORADO CUSTOMERS IN AN AMOUNT NO LESS THAN
$231,455.29, TO PAY A MONETARY FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, AND TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS. THE MONETARY FINE AND THE
RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
regulatory · block 36PDF pages 301–303
Regulator name — filed text
VIRGINIA - DIVISION OF SECURITIES
How was matter resolved — filed text
Settled
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN APRIL 2002 THE VIRGINIA STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION, DIVISION OF SECURITIES AND RETAIL FRANCHISING (THE "DIVISION") COMMENCED AN INVESTIGATION INTO EDWARD JONES BASED ON ACTIONS OF A FORMER FINANCIAL ADVISOR AND HIS RECOMMENDATION FOR USE OF MARGIN DATING BACK TO 1998. AFTER INVESTIGATING THE MATTER, THE DIVISION ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES CONDUCTED ACTIVITY THAT CONSTITUTED A VIOLATION OF THE VIRGINIA SECURITIES ACT AND PROVISIONS OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA: (I) BY ENGAGING IN A TRANSACTION, PRACTICE OR COURSE OF BUSINESS WHICH OPERATES AS A FRAUD OR DECEIT UPON A PURCHASER; (II) BY FAILING TO MAKE AND KEEP TRUE, ACCURATE AND CURRENT, AND PRESERVE THE BOOKS AND RECORDS RELATING TO ITS BUSINESS; (III) BY FAILING TO ESTABLISH, MAINTAIN AND ENFORCE WRITTEN PROCEDURES; (IV) BY FAILING TO PERFORM FREQUENT EXAMINATIONS OF ALL CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS TO DETECT AND PREVENT IRREGULARITIES OR ABUSES; AND (V) BY FAILING TO REVIEW AND RECEIVE WRITTEN APPROVAL BY THE DESIGNATED SUPERVISOR OF THE DELEGATION BY ANY CUSTOMER OF DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY WITH RESPECT TO THE CUSTOMER'S ACCOUNT.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES WILL OFFER TO PAY 50% OF THE EQUITY LOSSES INCURRED BY FOUR VIRGINIA INVESTORS IDENTIFIED BY THE DIVISION. EDWARD JONES WILL OFFER A REBATE OF 65% OF THE MARGIN INTEREST PAID BY THE VIRGINIA INVESTORS IDENTIFIED TO THE DIVISION AND WHO HAD A MARGIN LOAN BETWEEN JANUARY 1, 1998 AND JUNE 30, 2001.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II

1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
VIRGINIA - DIVISION OF SECURITIES
2.
Principal Sanction:
Restitution
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
03/19/2010
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
SEC-2007-00021
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
MARGIN LOANS
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN APRIL 2002 THE VIRGINIA STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION, DIVISION OF SECURITIES AND RETAIL FRANCHISING (THE "DIVISION") COMMENCED
AN INVESTIGATION INTO EDWARD JONES BASED ON ACTIONS OF A FORMER FINANCIAL ADVISOR AND HIS RECOMMENDATION FOR USE OF MARGIN
DATING BACK TO 1998. AFTER INVESTIGATING THE MATTER, THE DIVISION ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES CONDUCTED ACTIVITY THAT CONSTITUTED A
VIOLATION OF THE VIRGINIA SECURITIES ACT AND PROVISIONS OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA: (I) BY ENGAGING IN A TRANSACTION, PRACTICE OR
COURSE OF BUSINESS WHICH OPERATES AS A FRAUD OR DECEIT UPON A PURCHASER; (II) BY FAILING TO MAKE AND KEEP TRUE, ACCURATE AND
CURRENT, AND PRESERVE THE BOOKS AND RECORDS RELATING TO ITS BUSINESS; (III) BY FAILING TO ESTABLISH, MAINTAIN AND ENFORCE WRITTEN
PROCEDURES; (IV) BY FAILING TO PERFORM FREQUENT EXAMINATIONS OF ALL CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS TO DETECT AND PREVENT IRREGULARITIES OR
ABUSES; AND (V) BY FAILING TO REVIEW AND RECEIVE WRITTEN APPROVAL BY THE DESIGNATED SUPERVISOR OF THE DELEGATION BY ANY CUSTOMER
OF DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY WITH RESPECT TO THE CUSTOMER'S ACCOUNT.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Settled
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
07/02/2010
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES WILL OFFER TO PAY 50% OF THE EQUITY LOSSES INCURRED BY FOUR VIRGINIA INVESTORS IDENTIFIED BY THE DIVISION.
EDWARD JONES WILL OFFER A REBATE OF 65% OF THE MARGIN INTEREST PAID BY THE VIRGINIA INVESTORS IDENTIFIED TO THE DIVISION AND
WHO HAD A MARGIN LOAN BETWEEN JANUARY 1, 1998 AND JUNE 30, 2001.

13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 37PDF pages 303–304
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FINRA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Censure
Other Sanctions: 
MONETARY FINE.
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 

11/02/2006
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
2006006509601
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Debt - Municipal
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
FINRA ALLEGED EDWARD JONES VIOLATED MSRB RULE G-32 BY FAILING TO TIMELY DELIVER OFFICIAL STATEMENTS TO CERTAIN CUSTOMERS IN
VARIOUS TRANSACTIONS WHEN EDWARD JONES WAS NOT AN UNDERWRITER OR MEMBER OF THE SYNDICATE. FINRA ALLEGED EDWARD JONES
VIOLATED MSRB RULES G-8, G-27, AND G-17 IN REGARDS TO CERTAIN RECORD KEEPING REQUIREMENTS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
04/09/2009
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 900,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKING.
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, EDWARD JONES CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND ENTRY OF FINDINGS AND
WAS CENSURED AND FINED $900,000.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
EDWARD JONES IS ALSO REQUIRED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF THIS AWC TO ADOPT AND IMPLEMENT SYSTEMS AND
PROCEDURES REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH MSRB RULES G-32 AND G-8, INCLUDING SYSTEMS AND PROCEDURES TO
PROVIDE ADEQUATE OVERSIGHT IF THIRD PARTY VENDORS ARE UTILIZED, AND PROVIDE CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPAL OF OPERATIONS THAT
EDWARD JONES HAS ADOPTED AND IMPLEMENTED SUPERVISORY SYSTEMS AND PROCEDURES TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH MSRB RULES G-32 AND G-
8.
regulatory · block 38PDF pages 304–306
Regulator name — filed text
FINRA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 200,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

g g y (y p p p ) FINRA ALLEGED EDWARD JONES VIOLATED NASD RULES 2110, 3010(A), 3012(A)(2)(B)(I) BY FAILING TO ESTABLISH, MAINTAIN AND ENFORCE A SUPERVISORY SYSTEM, INCLUDING WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES THAT WERE REASONABLY DESIGNED TO REVIEW AND MONITOR ALL TRANSMITTALS OF FUNDS FROM THE ACCOUNTS OF CUSTOMERS TO THIRD PARTY ACCOUNTS. EDWARD JONES ALLEGEDLY RELIED ON A DEFECTIVE REPORT, WHICH WAS INCOMPLETE AND INACCURATE, TO REVIEW AND MONITOR THIRD PARTY WIRES FROM CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS, AND FAILED TO PROPERLY TEST AND VERIFY THE SYTEM PROVIDING THE REPORT WAS FUNCTIONING PROPERLY. AS A RESULT, THE REPORT FAILED TO INDENTIFY WIRES FROM ACCOUNTS FROM WHICH A FORMER EDWARD JONES FINANCIAL ADVISOR WAS CONVERTING FUNDS, AND THE FINANCIAL ADVISOR ULTIMATELY CONVERTED OVER $3 MILLION IN CUSTOMER FUNDS.

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, EDWARD JONES WAS CENSURED AND FINED $200,000.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)

11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FINRA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other
Other Sanctions: 
N/A
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/03/2009
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
2007010537701
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):

g
g
y
(y
p
p
p
)
FINRA ALLEGED EDWARD JONES VIOLATED NASD RULES 2110, 3010(A), 3012(A)(2)(B)(I) BY FAILING TO ESTABLISH, MAINTAIN AND ENFORCE A
SUPERVISORY SYSTEM, INCLUDING WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES THAT WERE REASONABLY DESIGNED TO REVIEW AND MONITOR ALL
TRANSMITTALS OF FUNDS FROM THE ACCOUNTS OF CUSTOMERS TO THIRD PARTY ACCOUNTS. EDWARD JONES ALLEGEDLY RELIED ON A DEFECTIVE
REPORT, WHICH WAS INCOMPLETE AND INACCURATE, TO REVIEW AND MONITOR THIRD PARTY WIRES FROM CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS, AND FAILED TO
PROPERLY TEST AND VERIFY THE SYTEM PROVIDING THE REPORT WAS FUNCTIONING PROPERLY. AS A RESULT, THE REPORT FAILED TO INDENTIFY
WIRES FROM ACCOUNTS FROM WHICH A FORMER EDWARD JONES FINANCIAL ADVISOR WAS CONVERTING FUNDS, AND THE FINANCIAL ADVISOR
ULTIMATELY CONVERTED OVER $3 MILLION IN CUSTOMER FUNDS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
06/02/2010
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 200,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, EDWARD JONES WAS CENSURED AND FINED $200,000.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 39PDF pages 306–308
Regulator name — filed text
FINRA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 55,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

FINRA RULE 4560, NASD RULES 2110, 2320, 3010, 3360, MSRB RULES G-17, G-30(A) - FINRA ALLEGED THAT: 1. IN 31 CORPORATE FIXED INCOME TRANSACTIONS FOR OR WITH A CUSTOMER, EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. FAILED TO USE REASONABLE DILIGENCE TO ASCERTAIN THE BEST INTER- DEALER MARKET AND FAILED TO BUY OR SELL IN SUCH MARKET SO THAT THE RESULTANT PRICE TO ITS CUSTOMER WAS AS FAVORABLE AS POSSIBLE UNDER PREVAILING MARKET CONDITIONS. 2. THE FIRM'S SUPERVISORY SYSTEM DID NOT PROVIDE FOR SUPERVISION REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES LAWS, REGULATIONS AND NASD RULES CONCERNING BEST EXECUTION OF CORPORATE FIXED INCOME TRANSACTIONS. 3. IN 10 TRANSACTIONS, THE FIRM PURCHASED MUNICIPAL SECURITIES FOR ITS OWN ACCOUNT FROM A CUSTOMER AND/OR SOLD MUNICIPAL SECURITIES FOR ITS OWN ACCOUNT TO A CUSTOMER AT AN AGGREGATE PRICE (INCLUDING ANY MARKDOWN OR MARKUP) THAT WAS NOT FAIR AND REASONABLE, TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION ALL RELEVANT FACTORS, INCLUDING THE BEST JUDGMENT OF THE BROKER, DEALER OR MUNICIPAL SECURITIES DEALER AS TO THE FAIR MARKET VALUE OF THE SECURITIES AT THE TIME OF THE TRANSACTION AND OF ANY SECURITIES EXCHANGED OR TRADED IN CONNECTION WITH THE TRANSACTIONS, THE EXPENSE INVOLVED IN EFFECTING THE TRANSACTION, THE FACT THAT THE BROKER, DEALER OR MUNICIPAL SECURITIES DEALER WAS ENTITLED TO A PROFIT, AND THE TOTAL DOLLAR AMOUNT OF THE TRANSACTION. 4. THE FIRM SUBMITTED INACCURATE SHORT INTEREST POSITION REPORTS TO NASD OR FINRA.

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS; THEREFORE, THE FIRM WAS CENSURED, FINED $55,000, OF WHICH $15,000 WAS FOR MSRB VIOLATIONS, AND ORDERED TO PAY $13,231.52 PLUS INTEREST IN RESTITUTION TO CUSTOMERS.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates

One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is Yes, no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FINRA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Censure
Other Sanctions: 
FINE; RESTITUTION
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
09/21/2007
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
2006005438901
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Debt - Corporate
Other Product Types: 
DEBT - MUNICIPAL
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
FINRA RULE 4560, NASD RULES 2110, 2320, 3010, 3360, MSRB RULES G-17, G-30(A) - FINRA ALLEGED THAT: 1. IN 31 CORPORATE FIXED INCOME
TRANSACTIONS FOR OR WITH A CUSTOMER, EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. FAILED TO USE REASONABLE DILIGENCE TO ASCERTAIN THE BEST INTER-
DEALER MARKET AND FAILED TO BUY OR SELL IN SUCH MARKET SO THAT THE RESULTANT PRICE TO ITS CUSTOMER WAS AS FAVORABLE AS POSSIBLE
UNDER PREVAILING MARKET CONDITIONS. 2. THE FIRM'S SUPERVISORY SYSTEM DID NOT PROVIDE FOR SUPERVISION REASONABLY DESIGNED TO
ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES LAWS, REGULATIONS AND NASD RULES CONCERNING BEST EXECUTION OF CORPORATE FIXED
INCOME TRANSACTIONS. 3. IN 10 TRANSACTIONS, THE FIRM PURCHASED MUNICIPAL SECURITIES FOR ITS OWN ACCOUNT FROM A CUSTOMER AND/OR
SOLD MUNICIPAL SECURITIES FOR ITS OWN ACCOUNT TO A CUSTOMER AT AN AGGREGATE PRICE (INCLUDING ANY MARKDOWN OR MARKUP) THAT WAS
NOT FAIR AND REASONABLE, TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION ALL RELEVANT FACTORS, INCLUDING THE BEST JUDGMENT OF THE BROKER, DEALER OR
MUNICIPAL SECURITIES DEALER AS TO THE FAIR MARKET VALUE OF THE SECURITIES AT THE TIME OF THE TRANSACTION AND OF ANY SECURITIES
EXCHANGED OR TRADED IN CONNECTION WITH THE TRANSACTIONS, THE EXPENSE INVOLVED IN EFFECTING THE TRANSACTION, THE FACT THAT THE
BROKER, DEALER OR MUNICIPAL SECURITIES DEALER WAS ENTITLED TO A PROFIT, AND THE TOTAL DOLLAR AMOUNT OF THE TRANSACTION. 4. THE
FIRM SUBMITTED INACCURATE SHORT INTEREST POSITION REPORTS TO NASD OR FINRA.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final

9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
04/10/2012
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 55,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS;
THEREFORE, THE FIRM WAS CENSURED, FINED $55,000, OF WHICH $15,000 WAS FOR MSRB VIOLATIONS, AND ORDERED TO PAY $13,231.52
PLUS INTEREST IN RESTITUTION TO CUSTOMERS.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 40PDF pages 308–310
Regulator name — filed text
MISSOURI SECURITIES DIVISION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 40,500.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN JULY 2009, THE MISSOURI SECURITIES DIVISION (THE "DIVISION") BEGAN AN INVESTIGATION REGARDING THE SALE OF A VARIABLE ANNUITY TO A CLIENT OF EDWARD JONES WHO IS NOW DECEASED. UPON COMPLETING ITS INVESTIGATION, THE DIVISION ALLEGED EDWARD JONES FAILED TO REASONABLY SUPERVISE ITS FINANCIAL ADVISOR BY FAILING TO REASONABLY REVIEW THE DEATH BENEFIT OPTIONS AVAILABLE FOR THE VARIABLE ANNUITY.

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE ALLEGATIONS, EDWARD JONES ENTERED INTO A CONSENT ORDER WITH THE DIVISION AND AGREED TO PAY RESTITUTION OF $10,500 TO THE CLIENT'S BENEFICIARIES, $25,000 TO THE STATE'S INVESTOR EDUCATION FUND, AND $5,000 AS THE COST OF THE INVESTIGATION.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE

No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
MISSOURI SECURITIES DIVISION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other
Other Sanctions: 
CONSENT
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
07/09/2010
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
AP-10-15
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Annuity(ies) - Variable
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN JULY 2009, THE MISSOURI SECURITIES DIVISION (THE "DIVISION") BEGAN AN INVESTIGATION REGARDING THE SALE OF A VARIABLE ANNUITY TO A
CLIENT OF EDWARD JONES WHO IS NOW DECEASED. UPON COMPLETING ITS INVESTIGATION, THE DIVISION ALLEGED EDWARD JONES FAILED TO
REASONABLY SUPERVISE ITS FINANCIAL ADVISOR BY FAILING TO REASONABLY REVIEW THE DEATH BENEFIT OPTIONS AVAILABLE FOR THE VARIABLE
ANNUITY.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
07/09/2010
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:

A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 40,500.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE ALLEGATIONS, EDWARD JONES ENTERED INTO A CONSENT ORDER WITH THE DIVISION AND AGREED TO
PAY RESTITUTION OF $10,500 TO THE CLIENT'S BENEFICIARIES, $25,000 TO THE STATE'S INVESTOR EDUCATION FUND, AND $5,000 AS THE COST
OF THE INVESTIGATION.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 41PDF pages 310–312
Regulator name — filed text
STATE OF MONTANA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THIS MATTER HAS BEEN RESOLVED AS SET FORTH ABOVE.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

THE MONTANA SECURITIES DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED THE ACTIONS OF A FORMER FINANCIAL ADVISOR FOR ALLEGEDLY MISAPPROPRIATING CUSTOMER FUNDS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES TERMINATED THE FINANCIAL ADVISOR AND REPORTED THE MATTER TO THE MONTANA SECURITIES DEPARTMENT. EDWARD JONES AND THE MONTANA SECURITIES DEPARTMENT HAVE ENTERED INTO A CONSENT AGREEMENT WHICH INCLUDES EDWARD JONES PAYING A $100,000 FINE FOR A BOOKS AND RECORDS VIOLATION, PAYING SIX CUSTOMERS A TOTAL OF $349,464.92 IN RESTITUTION, STORING EXACT DUPLICATES OF CERTAIN TYPES OF IDENTIFIED NEGATIVE CONFIRMATION LETTERS, AND UNDERTAKING A REVIEW OF ITS WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO THE EXECUTION OF BLANK LETTERS OF AUTHORIZATION.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.

 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
STATE OF MONTANA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
03/02/2010
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
SEC-2010-32
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE MONTANA SECURITIES DEPARTMENT INVESTIGATED THE ACTIONS OF A FORMER FINANCIAL ADVISOR FOR ALLEGEDLY MISAPPROPRIATING
CUSTOMER FUNDS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
11/09/2010
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES TERMINATED THE FINANCIAL ADVISOR AND REPORTED THE MATTER TO THE MONTANA SECURITIES DEPARTMENT. EDWARD JONES
AND THE MONTANA SECURITIES DEPARTMENT HAVE ENTERED INTO A CONSENT AGREEMENT WHICH INCLUDES EDWARD JONES PAYING A
$100,000 FINE FOR A BOOKS AND RECORDS VIOLATION, PAYING SIX CUSTOMERS A TOTAL OF $349,464.92 IN RESTITUTION, STORING EXACT
DUPLICATES OF CERTAIN TYPES OF IDENTIFIED NEGATIVE CONFIRMATION LETTERS, AND UNDERTAKING A REVIEW OF ITS WRITTEN SUPERVISORY
PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO THE EXECUTION OF BLANK LETTERS OF AUTHORIZATION.

13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THIS MATTER HAS BEEN RESOLVED AS SET FORTH ABOVE.
regulatory · block 42PDF pages 312–313
Regulator name — filed text
MAINE OFFICE OF SECURITIES
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 10,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Order

Action status / disposition — filed text

THIS MATTER HAS BEEN RESOLVED AS SET FORTH ABOVE.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

THE STATE OF MAINE OFFICE OF SECURITIES INVESTIGATED THE ACTIONS OF A FORMER FINANCIAL ADVISOR FOR ALLEGEDLY EXERCISING DISCRETION IN TWO CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS, AND INVESTIGATED EDWARD JONES TO DETERMINE WHETHER IT FAILED TO REASONABLY SUPERVISE THE FINANCIAL ADVISOR.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AND THE OFFICE OF SECURITIES HAVE ENTERED INTO A CONSENT ORDER WHICH INCLUDES EDWARD JONES PAYING A $10,000 FINE, AND WHICH STATES THAT EDWARD JONES FAILED TO REASONABLY SUPERVISE THE FINANCIAL ADVISOR BY FAILING TO DETECT OR TAKE TIMELY ACTION REGARDING CONFLICTING INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE FINANCIAL ADVISOR, AND FAILED TO DETECT OR ADEQUATELY INVESTIGATE THE FINANCIAL ADVISOR'S USE OF DISCRETION IN TWO CLIENT ACCOUNTS AND TO CONFIRM THE ACCURACY OF ITS REPRESENTATIONS TO THE OFFICE OF SECURITIES.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
MAINE OFFICE OF SECURITIES
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 

10/15/2008
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
08-012
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
CD(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE STATE OF MAINE OFFICE OF SECURITIES INVESTIGATED THE ACTIONS OF A FORMER FINANCIAL ADVISOR FOR ALLEGEDLY EXERCISING
DISCRETION IN TWO CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS, AND INVESTIGATED EDWARD JONES TO DETERMINE WHETHER IT FAILED TO REASONABLY SUPERVISE THE
FINANCIAL ADVISOR.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Order
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
10/28/2010
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
THE ORDER WAS SIGNED ON 10/28/2010, AND THE FINE PAID ON 11/04/2010.
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 10,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AND THE OFFICE OF SECURITIES HAVE ENTERED INTO A CONSENT ORDER WHICH INCLUDES EDWARD JONES PAYING A $10,000
FINE, AND WHICH STATES THAT EDWARD JONES FAILED TO REASONABLY SUPERVISE THE FINANCIAL ADVISOR BY FAILING TO DETECT OR TAKE
TIMELY ACTION REGARDING CONFLICTING INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE FINANCIAL ADVISOR, AND FAILED TO DETECT OR ADEQUATELY
INVESTIGATE THE FINANCIAL ADVISOR'S USE OF DISCRETION IN TWO CLIENT ACCOUNTS AND TO CONFIRM THE ACCURACY OF ITS
REPRESENTATIONS TO THE OFFICE OF SECURITIES.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THIS MATTER HAS BEEN RESOLVED AS SET FORTH ABOVE.
regulatory · block 43PDF pages 313–315
Regulator name — filed text
STATE OF INDIANA OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE, SECURITIES DIVISION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 10,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

g g y (y p p p ) IN JULY 2009, THE INDIANA SECRETARY OF STATE, SECURITIES DIVISION (THE "STATE") ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES FAILED TO SUPERVISE THE ACTIVITIES OF A NOW DECEASED FINANCIAL ADVISOR. SPECIFICALLY, THE STATE ALLEGED THE FINANCIAL ADVISOR WAS ABLE TO CHANGE THE PRIMARY ACCOUNT HOLDER AND SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER ON AN ACCOUNT BY SUBMITTING A FORM TO THE HEADQUARTERS OFFICE WITHOUT THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF SIGNATURES, IN VIOLATION OF FIRM POLICY.

Sanction detail — filed text

ON MARCH 1, 2011, EDWARD JONES AND THE STATE ENTERED INTO A CONSENT AGREEMENT IN WHICH EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY THE STATE $10,000 TO RESOLVE THE MATTER, WITHOUT ANY ADMISSION OF FAULT OR WRONGDOING.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)

11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
STATE OF INDIANA OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE, SECURITIES DIVISION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
12/22/2010
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
10-0504 CA
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other
Other Product Types: 
SECURITIES
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):

g
g
y
(y
p
p
p
)
IN JULY 2009, THE INDIANA SECRETARY OF STATE, SECURITIES DIVISION (THE "STATE") ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES FAILED TO SUPERVISE THE
ACTIVITIES OF A NOW DECEASED FINANCIAL ADVISOR. SPECIFICALLY, THE STATE ALLEGED THE FINANCIAL ADVISOR WAS ABLE TO CHANGE THE
PRIMARY ACCOUNT HOLDER AND SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER ON AN ACCOUNT BY SUBMITTING A FORM TO THE HEADQUARTERS OFFICE WITHOUT THE
REQUIRED NUMBER OF SIGNATURES, IN VIOLATION OF FIRM POLICY.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
03/01/2011
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 10,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
ON MARCH 1, 2011, EDWARD JONES AND THE STATE ENTERED INTO A CONSENT AGREEMENT IN WHICH EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY THE
STATE $10,000 TO RESOLVE THE MATTER, WITHOUT ANY ADMISSION OF FAULT OR WRONGDOING.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 44PDF pages 315–317
Regulator name — filed text
FINRA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 95,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

FINRA ALLEGES THAT EDWARD JONES VIOLATED NASD CONDUCT RULES 2110 AND 3010(B) AND FINRA RULE 2010. FINRA ALLEGES THAT EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ADEQUATELY REVIEW A CUSTOMER ACCOUNT THAT WAS UNDER HEIGHTENED SCRUTINY, AND FAILED TO RESPOND TO RED FLAGS THAT WOULD HAVE ALERTED IT TO THE ACTIVITIES OF AN ASSOCIATE WHO CONVERTED MONEY FROM THE ACCOUNT. THE ASSOCIATE WAS ABLE TO CONVERT $167,249 FROM THE CUSTOMER'S ACCOUNT BY USING FORGED LETTERS OF AUTHORIZATION TO EFFECT 51 WIRE TRANSFERS OUT OF THE ACCOUNT WITHOUT PERMISSION OR AUTHORITY.

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS; THEREFORE, THE FIRM WAS CENSURED AND FINED $95,000.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates

If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FINRA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Censure
Other Sanctions: 
FINE
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
02/08/2010
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
2010021566902
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other
Other Product Types: 
WIRED FUNDS
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
FINRA ALLEGES THAT EDWARD JONES VIOLATED NASD CONDUCT RULES 2110 AND 3010(B) AND FINRA RULE 2010. FINRA ALLEGES THAT EDWARD
JONES FAILED TO ADEQUATELY REVIEW A CUSTOMER ACCOUNT THAT WAS UNDER HEIGHTENED SCRUTINY, AND FAILED TO RESPOND TO RED FLAGS
THAT WOULD HAVE ALERTED IT TO THE ACTIVITIES OF AN ASSOCIATE WHO CONVERTED MONEY FROM THE ACCOUNT. THE ASSOCIATE WAS ABLE TO
CONVERT $167,249 FROM THE CUSTOMER'S ACCOUNT BY USING FORGED LETTERS OF AUTHORIZATION TO EFFECT 51 WIRE TRANSFERS OUT OF THE
ACCOUNT WITHOUT PERMISSION OR AUTHORITY.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)

11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
07/02/2012
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 95,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS;
THEREFORE, THE FIRM WAS CENSURED AND FINED $95,000.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 45PDF pages 317–319
Regulator name — filed text
FINRA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 35,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

ON JULY 13, 2012, FINRA ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES' PAYROLL DEPARTMENT PERIODICALLY RECEIVED GARNISHMENTS FROM JUDGMENT CREDITORS, TAX LEVIES FROM FEDERAL AND STATE TAXING AUTHORITIES, AND/OR BANKRUPTCY WAGE WITHHOLDING ORDERS INVOLVING EDWARD JONES FINANCIAL ADVISORS. FINRA ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES TO ENSURE THAT FINANCIAL ADVISORS' UNIFORM APPLICATIONS FOR SECURITIES INDUSTRY REGISTRATION OR TRANSFER (FORMS U4) WERE UPDATED TO REFLECT DISCLOSURES OF WHICH THE FIRM'S PAYROLL DEPARTMENT WAS ON NOTICE AND DID NOT TIMELY FILE FORM U4 AMENDMENTS, IN VIOLATION OF ARTICLE V, SECTION 2(C) OF THE FINRA BY-LAWS, FINRA RULE 2010, AND NASD RULES 2110 AND 3010(B). ON DECEMBER 17, 2012, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, ENTERED INTO A LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT IN WHICH EDWARD JONES WAS CENSURED AND ORDERED TO PAY A FINE OF $35,000.

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, EDWARD JONES CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS, THEREFORE EDWARD JONES WAS CENSURED AND FINED $35,000.00.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.

This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FINRA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other
Other Sanctions: 
N/A
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
12/17/2012
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
2010025367601
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
ON JULY 13, 2012, FINRA ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES' PAYROLL DEPARTMENT PERIODICALLY RECEIVED GARNISHMENTS FROM JUDGMENT
CREDITORS, TAX LEVIES FROM FEDERAL AND STATE TAXING AUTHORITIES, AND/OR BANKRUPTCY WAGE WITHHOLDING ORDERS INVOLVING EDWARD
JONES FINANCIAL ADVISORS. FINRA ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES TO
ENSURE THAT FINANCIAL ADVISORS' UNIFORM APPLICATIONS FOR SECURITIES INDUSTRY REGISTRATION OR TRANSFER (FORMS U4) WERE UPDATED TO
REFLECT DISCLOSURES OF WHICH THE FIRM'S PAYROLL DEPARTMENT WAS ON NOTICE AND DID NOT TIMELY FILE FORM U4 AMENDMENTS, IN
VIOLATION OF ARTICLE V, SECTION 2(C) OF THE FINRA BY-LAWS, FINRA RULE 2010, AND NASD RULES 2110 AND 3010(B). ON DECEMBER 17, 2012,
EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, ENTERED INTO A LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT IN WHICH
EDWARD JONES WAS CENSURED AND ORDERED TO PAY A FINE OF $35,000.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/17/2012
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 35,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension

B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, EDWARD JONES CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS,
THEREFORE EDWARD JONES WAS CENSURED AND FINED $35,000.00.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 46PDF pages 319–320
Regulator name — filed text
FINRA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 160,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

ON JUNE 7, 2013, FINRA ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES VIOLATED MSRB RULES G-17 AND G-30(A) BY PURCHASING MUNICIPAL SECURITIES FOR ITS OWN ACCOUNT FROM CUSTOMERS AND/OR SELLING MUNICIPAL SECURITIES FOR ITS OWN ACCOUNT TO CUSTOMERS AT AN AGGREGATE PRICE (INCLUDING ANY MARKDOWN OR MARKUP) THAT WAS NOT FAIR AND REASONABLE, TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION ALL RELEVANT FACTS, INCLUDING THE BEST JUDGMENT OF THE BROKER, DEALER OR MUNICIPAL SECURITIES DEALER AS TO THE FAIR MARKET VALUE OF THE SECURITIES AT THE TIME OF THE TRANSACTION AND OF ANY SECURITIES EXCHANGED OR TRADED IN CONNECTION WITH THE TRANSACTION, THE EXPENSE INVOLVED IN EFFECTING THE TRANSACTION, THE FACT THAT THE BROKER, DEALER, OR MUNICIPAL SECURITIES DEALER IS ENTITLED TO A PROFIT, AND THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF THE TRANSACTION. ON JUNE 7, 2013, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, ENTERED INTO A LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT IN WHICH EDWARD JONES WAS CENSURED AND ORDERED TO PAY A FINE OF $160,000.

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, EDWARD JONES CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS, THEREFORE EDWARD JONES WAS CENSURED AND FINED $160,000.00.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:

SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FINRA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
06/07/2013
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
2009018103101
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Debt - Municipal
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
ON JUNE 7, 2013, FINRA ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES VIOLATED MSRB RULES G-17 AND G-30(A) BY PURCHASING MUNICIPAL SECURITIES FOR ITS
OWN ACCOUNT FROM CUSTOMERS AND/OR SELLING MUNICIPAL SECURITIES FOR ITS OWN ACCOUNT TO CUSTOMERS AT AN AGGREGATE PRICE
(INCLUDING ANY MARKDOWN OR MARKUP) THAT WAS NOT FAIR AND REASONABLE, TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION ALL RELEVANT FACTS, INCLUDING
THE BEST JUDGMENT OF THE BROKER, DEALER OR MUNICIPAL SECURITIES DEALER AS TO THE FAIR MARKET VALUE OF THE SECURITIES AT THE TIME OF
THE TRANSACTION AND OF ANY SECURITIES EXCHANGED OR TRADED IN CONNECTION WITH THE TRANSACTION, THE EXPENSE INVOLVED IN EFFECTING
THE TRANSACTION, THE FACT THAT THE BROKER, DEALER, OR MUNICIPAL SECURITIES DEALER IS ENTITLED TO A PROFIT, AND THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF
THE TRANSACTION. ON JUNE 7, 2013, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, ENTERED INTO A LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE,
WAIVER AND CONSENT IN WHICH EDWARD JONES WAS CENSURED AND ORDERED TO PAY A FINE OF $160,000.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
06/07/2013
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 160,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, EDWARD JONES CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS,
THEREFORE EDWARD JONES WAS CENSURED AND FINED $160,000.00.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 47PDF pages 321–322
Regulator name — filed text
NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF BANKING & FINANCE
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 10,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

THE NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES: (1) FAILED TO MAINTAIN TRUE AND ACCURATE RECORDS; AND (2) FAILED TO MAINTAIN REQUIRED BOOKS AND RECORDS. THE ALLEGATIONS STEM FROM A SINGLE FINANCIAL ADVISOR'S HANDLING OF HER MINOR CHILD'S CUSTODIAL ACCOUNT.

Sanction detail — filed text

ON NOVEMBER 20, 2013, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, ENTERED INTO A CONSENT ORDER IN WHICH EDWARD JONES WAS FINED $10,000 AND AGREED TO PAY $2,500 IN COSTS.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF BANKING & FINANCE
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
06/23/2010
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:

5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES: (1) FAILED TO MAINTAIN TRUE AND ACCURATE RECORDS; AND
(2) FAILED TO MAINTAIN REQUIRED BOOKS AND RECORDS. THE ALLEGATIONS STEM FROM A SINGLE FINANCIAL ADVISOR'S HANDLING OF HER MINOR
CHILD'S CUSTODIAL ACCOUNT.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
11/20/2013
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 10,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
COSTS OF $2,500.
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
ON NOVEMBER 20, 2013, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, ENTERED INTO A CONSENT ORDER IN WHICH
EDWARD JONES WAS FINED $10,000 AND AGREED TO PAY $2,500 IN COSTS.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 48PDF pages 322–324
Regulator name — filed text
FINRA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 200,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

ON JANUARY 9, 2014, FINRA ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES VIOLATED FINRA RULE 2010 AND NASD RULES 2110, 2310, AND 3010. FINRA ALLEGED THAT, FOR ALMOST A YEAR AND A HALF, EDWARD JONES ALLOWED ITS REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES TO RECOMMEND NONTRADITIONAL EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS (ETFS) TO CLIENTS WITHOUT FIRST CONDUCTING REASONABLE DUE DILIGENCE CONCERNING THOSE PRODUCTS. FINRA ALSO ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT TRAIN OR ADEQUATELY EDUCATE ITS REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING NONTRADITIONAL ETFS BEFORE PERMITTING THEM TO RECOMMEND THEM TO CLIENTS AND THAT EDWARD JONES' REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES PLACED NUMEROUS NONTRADITIONAL ETF TRANSACTIONS, AT A COMBINED VALUE OF APPROXIMATELY $164 MILLION, IN RETAIL CLIENTS' ACCOUNTS, DURING THE PERIOD. FINRA ALLEGED THAT CERTAIN EDWARD JONES REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES RECOMMENDED NONTRADITIONAL ETFS TO CLIENTS WHO HAD NOT INDICATED A DESIRE TO TAKE AGGRESSIVE RISKS WITH THEIR ACCOUNTS AT EDWARD JONES AND THAT SOME OF THESE CLIENTS HELD THEIR NONTRADITIONAL ETF POSITIONS FOR WEEKS OR MONTHS AT A TIME. FINRA ASSERTED THAT NONTRADITIONAL ETFS ARE TYPICALLY NOT SUITABLE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS WHO PLAN TO HOLD THEM FOR MORE THAN ONE TRADING SESSION, PARTICULARLY IN VOLATILE MARKETS. FINRA ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES: (1) FAILED TO ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN A SUPERVISORY SYSTEM, INCLUDING WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES, REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE NASD OR FINRA RULES IN CONNECTION WITH THE SALE OF NONTRADITIONAL ETFS; (2) FAILED TO ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN AN ADEQUATE SUPERVISORY SYSTEM TO MONITOR TRANSACTIONS IN NONTRADITIONAL ETFS INVOLVING ITS RETAIL CLIENTS; (3) DID NOT EXERCISE DUE DILIGENCE IN INVESTIGATING NONTRADITIONAL ETFS; (4) DID NOT ENSURE THAT ITS REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES OBTAINED ADEQUATE INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTION REGARDING NONTRADITIONAL ETFS BEFORE RECOMMENDING THOSE PRODUCTS TO CLIENTS; AND (5) FOR THE PERIOD, DID NOT PROVIDE SUCH INFORMATION DIRECTLY TO REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES OR REQUIRE THAT THEY OBTAIN IT FROM OTHER SOURCES. FINRA ALSO ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES' SUPERVISORY SYSTEM WAS INADEQUATE WITH RESPECT TO ITS OVERSIGHT OF NONTRADITIONAL ETF TRANSACTIONS AND UNTIL THE TIME WHEN FINRA ISSUED REGULATORY NOTICE 09-31, RELIED ON ITS GENERAL SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES TO OVERSEE TRANSACTIONS IN NONTRADITIONAL ETFS. FINRA ALLEGED THAT THOSE PROCEDURES DID NOT ADDRESS THE PRODUCTS' UNIQUE FEATURES AND RISKS, E.G., EDWARD JONES' SALES-EXCEPTION REPORTS AND OTHER SUPERVISORY TOOLS DID NOT DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN EXCHANGED-TRADED EQUITY SECURITIES, TRADITIONAL ETFS, AND NONTRADITIONAL ETFS. FINRA ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES' GENERAL SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES DID NOT REQUIRE IT TO MONITOR EITHER THE LENGTH OF TIME CLIENTS HELD OPEN POSITIONS IN NONTRADITIONAL ETFS OR THE EFFECT OF LONG HOLDING PERIODS ON THOSE POSITIONS.

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, ON JANUARY 9, 2014, EDWARD JONES ENTERED INTO A LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT IN WHICH EDWARD JONES WAS CENSURED, FINED $200,000, AND ORDERED TO PAY $51,581.25 IN RESTITUTION TO CLIENTS. THE RESTITUTION IS TO BE PAID ON OR ABOUT MAY 9, 2014.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.

PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FINRA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other
Other Sanctions: 
N/A
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
01/09/2014
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
2010022283702
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other
Other Product Types: 
NONTRADITIONAL EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS (ETFS)
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
ON JANUARY 9, 2014, FINRA ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES VIOLATED FINRA RULE 2010 AND NASD RULES 2110, 2310, AND 3010. FINRA ALLEGED
THAT, FOR ALMOST A YEAR AND A HALF, EDWARD JONES ALLOWED ITS REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES TO RECOMMEND NONTRADITIONAL EXCHANGE
TRADED FUNDS (ETFS) TO CLIENTS WITHOUT FIRST CONDUCTING REASONABLE DUE DILIGENCE CONCERNING THOSE PRODUCTS. FINRA ALSO ALLEGED
THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT TRAIN OR ADEQUATELY EDUCATE ITS REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING NONTRADITIONAL ETFS BEFORE
PERMITTING THEM TO RECOMMEND THEM TO CLIENTS AND THAT EDWARD JONES' REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES PLACED NUMEROUS
NONTRADITIONAL ETF TRANSACTIONS, AT A COMBINED VALUE OF APPROXIMATELY $164 MILLION, IN RETAIL CLIENTS' ACCOUNTS, DURING THE
PERIOD. FINRA ALLEGED THAT CERTAIN EDWARD JONES REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES RECOMMENDED NONTRADITIONAL ETFS TO CLIENTS WHO HAD
NOT INDICATED A DESIRE TO TAKE AGGRESSIVE RISKS WITH THEIR ACCOUNTS AT EDWARD JONES AND THAT SOME OF THESE CLIENTS HELD THEIR
NONTRADITIONAL ETF POSITIONS FOR WEEKS OR MONTHS AT A TIME. FINRA ASSERTED THAT NONTRADITIONAL ETFS ARE TYPICALLY NOT SUITABLE

FOR RETAIL INVESTORS WHO PLAN TO HOLD THEM FOR MORE THAN ONE TRADING SESSION, PARTICULARLY IN VOLATILE MARKETS. FINRA ALLEGED
THAT EDWARD JONES: (1) FAILED TO ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN A SUPERVISORY SYSTEM, INCLUDING WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES,
REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE NASD OR FINRA RULES IN CONNECTION WITH THE SALE OF NONTRADITIONAL
ETFS; (2) FAILED TO ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN AN ADEQUATE SUPERVISORY SYSTEM TO MONITOR TRANSACTIONS IN NONTRADITIONAL ETFS
INVOLVING ITS RETAIL CLIENTS; (3) DID NOT EXERCISE DUE DILIGENCE IN INVESTIGATING NONTRADITIONAL ETFS; (4) DID NOT ENSURE THAT ITS
REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES OBTAINED ADEQUATE INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTION REGARDING NONTRADITIONAL ETFS BEFORE RECOMMENDING
THOSE PRODUCTS TO CLIENTS; AND (5) FOR THE PERIOD, DID NOT PROVIDE SUCH INFORMATION DIRECTLY TO REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES OR
REQUIRE THAT THEY OBTAIN IT FROM OTHER SOURCES. FINRA ALSO ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES' SUPERVISORY SYSTEM WAS INADEQUATE WITH
RESPECT TO ITS OVERSIGHT OF NONTRADITIONAL ETF TRANSACTIONS AND UNTIL THE TIME WHEN FINRA ISSUED REGULATORY NOTICE 09-31, RELIED
ON ITS GENERAL SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES TO OVERSEE TRANSACTIONS IN NONTRADITIONAL ETFS. FINRA ALLEGED THAT THOSE PROCEDURES DID
NOT ADDRESS THE PRODUCTS' UNIQUE FEATURES AND RISKS, E.G., EDWARD JONES' SALES-EXCEPTION REPORTS AND OTHER SUPERVISORY TOOLS DID
NOT DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN EXCHANGED-TRADED EQUITY SECURITIES, TRADITIONAL ETFS, AND NONTRADITIONAL ETFS. FINRA ALLEGED THAT
EDWARD JONES' GENERAL SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES DID NOT REQUIRE IT TO MONITOR EITHER THE LENGTH OF TIME CLIENTS HELD OPEN
POSITIONS IN NONTRADITIONAL ETFS OR THE EFFECT OF LONG HOLDING PERIODS ON THOSE POSITIONS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
01/09/2014
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 200,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, ON JANUARY 9, 2014, EDWARD JONES ENTERED INTO A LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND
CONSENT IN WHICH EDWARD JONES WAS CENSURED, FINED $200,000, AND ORDERED TO PAY $51,581.25 IN RESTITUTION TO CLIENTS. THE
RESTITUTION IS TO BE PAID ON OR ABOUT MAY 9, 2014.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 49PDF pages 324–326
Regulator name — filed text
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, DEPARTMENT OF STATE, BUREAU OF SECURITIES REGULATION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 750,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, DEPARTMENT OF STATE, BUREAU OF SECURITIES REGULATION ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES VIOLATED N.H. RSA 421- B:8, X, WHICH REQUIRES EDWARD JONES TO COMPLY WITH THE RULES OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, FINRA, NATIONAL AND REGIONAL STOCK EXCHANGES, AND OTHER SELF-REGULATING ORGANIZATIONS WHICH HAVE JURISDICTION OVER EDWARD JONES. THE ALLEGED VIOLATIONS INCLUDED THAT: 1) SOLICITATION CALLS WERE BEING MADE IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE TELEPHONE SOLICITATION RULES; 2) EDWARD JONES FAILED TO PROPERLY TRAIN AND SUPERVISE FINANCIAL ADVISORS IN THE AREA OF TELEPHONE SOLICITATION; AND 3) EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ESTABLISH A SYSTEM AND PROCEDURES REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE TELEPHONE SOLICITATION RULES.

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, EDWARD JONES ENTERED INTO A CONSENT ORDER WITH A MONETARY SETTLEMENT AMOUNT OF $750,000. THE BREAKDOWN IS $175,000 IN COSTS, A $175,000 CONTRIBUTION TO NH INVESTOR EDUCATION, AND A $400,000 ADMINISTRATIVE FINE. THE MONETARY SETTLEMENT WAS PAID IN FULL ON 3/3/2014.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 

One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, DEPARTMENT OF STATE, BUREAU OF SECURITIES REGULATION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Cease and Desist
Other Sanctions: 
MONETARY FINE - SEE QUESTION 12.C.
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
04/11/2013
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
C-201200002
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, DEPARTMENT OF STATE, BUREAU OF SECURITIES REGULATION ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES VIOLATED N.H. RSA 421-
B:8, X, WHICH REQUIRES EDWARD JONES TO COMPLY WITH THE RULES OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, FINRA, NATIONAL AND
REGIONAL STOCK EXCHANGES, AND OTHER SELF-REGULATING ORGANIZATIONS WHICH HAVE JURISDICTION OVER EDWARD JONES. THE ALLEGED
VIOLATIONS INCLUDED THAT: 1) SOLICITATION CALLS WERE BEING MADE IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE TELEPHONE SOLICITATION RULES; 2)
EDWARD JONES FAILED TO PROPERLY TRAIN AND SUPERVISE FINANCIAL ADVISORS IN THE AREA OF TELEPHONE SOLICITATION; AND 3) EDWARD
JONES FAILED TO ESTABLISH A SYSTEM AND PROCEDURES REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE TELEPHONE
SOLICITATION RULES.

8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
02/25/2014
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 750,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, EDWARD JONES ENTERED INTO A CONSENT ORDER REQUIRING EDWARD JONES TO IMPLEMENT
PROCEDURAL CHANGES IN THE AREAS OF TRAINING, COMPLIANCE, AND SUPERVISION OF FINANCIAL ADVISORS' TELEPHONE SOLICITATION
ACTIVITY AND REPORT ON COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONSENT ORDER AT SIX MONTHS AND ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE OF EXECUTION OF THE
CONSENT ORDER.
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, EDWARD JONES ENTERED INTO A CONSENT ORDER WITH A MONETARY SETTLEMENT AMOUNT
OF $750,000. THE BREAKDOWN IS $175,000 IN COSTS, A $175,000 CONTRIBUTION TO NH INVESTOR EDUCATION, AND A $400,000
ADMINISTRATIVE FINE. THE MONETARY SETTLEMENT WAS PAID IN FULL ON 3/3/2014.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 50PDF pages 326–328
Regulator name — filed text
FINRA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 21,100.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

ON JULY 9, 2014, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO AN ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT (AWC) WITH FINRA. PURSUANT TO THE AWC, THE FIRM WILL MAKE RESTITUTION TO SIXTEEN PUBLIC CUSTOMERS (IN THE AMOUNT OF $9,784.25, PLUS INTEREST) FOR FAILING TO OBTAIN THE BEST EXECUTION PRICE FOR TRADES OCCURRING IN 2011, IN VARIOUS GOVERNMENT FIXED INCOME PRODUCTS. THE FIRM WILL ALSO PAY A FINE OF $21,100.

Sanction detail — filed text

ON JULY 9, 2014, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO AN ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT (AWC). PURSUANT TO THE AWC, THE FIRM WILL MAKE RESTITUTION TO SIXTEEN PUBLIC CUSTOMERS (IN THE AMOUNT OF $9,784.25, PLUS INTEREST) AND WILL PAY A FINE OF $21,100. THE FINE WILL BE PAID IMMEDIATELY AFTER RECEIVING THE APPROPRIATE FORMS FROM FINRA'S FINANCE DEPARTMENT. THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID ON OR BEFORE 120 DAYS FROM JULY 9, 2014.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates

If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FINRA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
07/09/2014
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
2011027686301
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Debt - Municipal
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
ON JULY 9, 2014, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO AN ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT (AWC) WITH FINRA. PURSUANT TO THE AWC, THE FIRM WILL
MAKE RESTITUTION TO SIXTEEN PUBLIC CUSTOMERS (IN THE AMOUNT OF $9,784.25, PLUS INTEREST) FOR FAILING TO OBTAIN THE BEST EXECUTION
PRICE FOR TRADES OCCURRING IN 2011, IN VARIOUS GOVERNMENT FIXED INCOME PRODUCTS. THE FIRM WILL ALSO PAY A FINE OF $21,100.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
07/09/2014
 Exact
 Explanation

If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 21,100.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
RESTITUTION IN THE AMOUNT OF $9,784.25, PLUS INTEREST.
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
ON JULY 9, 2014, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO AN ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT (AWC). PURSUANT TO THE AWC, THE FIRM WILL MAKE
RESTITUTION TO SIXTEEN PUBLIC CUSTOMERS (IN THE AMOUNT OF $9,784.25, PLUS INTEREST) AND WILL PAY A FINE OF $21,100. THE FINE
WILL BE PAID IMMEDIATELY AFTER RECEIVING THE APPROPRIATE FORMS FROM FINRA'S FINANCE DEPARTMENT. THE RESTITUTION WILL BE PAID
ON OR BEFORE 120 DAYS FROM JULY 9, 2014.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 51PDF pages 328–330
Regulator name — filed text
FINRA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

ON OCTOBER 10, 2014, FINRA ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES FAILED TO DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT ADEQUATE ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING (AML) PROCEDURES FOR REVIEWING DEPOSITS AND LIQUIDATIONS OF THIRD-PARTY STOCK CERTIFICATES IN CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS IN VIOLATION OF NASD RULES 3011(A) AND 2110 AND FINRA RULES 3310(A) AND 2010. ON OCTOBER 10, 2014, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, ENTERED INTO A LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT (AWC) WITH FINRA. PURSUANT TO THE AWC, EDWARD JONES WAS CENSURED AND ORDERED TO PAY A FINE OF $100,000. THE FINE WAS PAID ON OCTOBER 23, 2014.

Sanction detail — filed text

ON OCTOBER 10, 2014, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, ENTERED INTO A LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT (AWC) WITH FINRA. PURSUANT TO THE AWC, EDWARD JONES WAS CENSURED AND ORDERED TO PAY A FINE OF $100,000. THE FINE WAS PAID ON OCTOBER 23, 2014.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the

circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FINRA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
10/10/2014
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
2012031611301
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
ON OCTOBER 10, 2014, FINRA ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES FAILED TO DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT ADEQUATE ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING (AML)
PROCEDURES FOR REVIEWING DEPOSITS AND LIQUIDATIONS OF THIRD-PARTY STOCK CERTIFICATES IN CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS IN VIOLATION OF NASD
RULES 3011(A) AND 2110 AND FINRA RULES 3310(A) AND 2010. ON OCTOBER 10, 2014, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE
FINDINGS, ENTERED INTO A LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT (AWC) WITH FINRA. PURSUANT TO THE AWC, EDWARD JONES WAS
CENSURED AND ORDERED TO PAY A FINE OF $100,000. THE FINE WAS PAID ON OCTOBER 23, 2014.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
10/10/2014
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,

disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
ON OCTOBER 10, 2014, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, ENTERED INTO A LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER
AND CONSENT (AWC) WITH FINRA. PURSUANT TO THE AWC, EDWARD JONES WAS CENSURED AND ORDERED TO PAY A FINE OF $100,000. THE
FINE WAS PAID ON OCTOBER 23, 2014.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 52PDF pages 330–331
Regulator name — filed text
FINRA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 60,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

ON JANUARY 15, 2015, FINRA ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ESTABLISH, MAINTAIN, AND ENFORCE AN ADEQUATE SUPERVISORY SYSTEM AND WRITTEN POLICIES AND PROCEDURES CONCERNING THE CERTIFICATION OF CUSTOMER SIGNATURES ON CERTAIN DOCUMENTS IN VIOLATION OF NASD RULES 3010(A) AND (B), NASD RULE 2110 (FOR THE PERIOD BEFORE DECEMBER 15, 2008) AND FINRA RULE 2010 (FOR THE PERIOD ON OR AFTER DECEMBER 15, 2008). ON JANUARY 15, 2015, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, ENTERED INTO A LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT (AWC) WITH FINRA. PURSUANT TO THE AWC, EDWARD JONES WAS CENSURED AND ORDERED TO PAY A FINE OF $60,000. THE FINE WAS PAID ON JANUARY 21, 2015.

Sanction detail — filed text

ON JANUARY 15, 2015, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, ENTERED INTO A LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT (AWC) WITH FINRA. PURSUANT TO THE AWC, EDWARD JONES WAS CENSURED AND ORDERED TO PAY A FINE OF $60,000. THE FINE WAS PAID ON JANUARY 21, 2015.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FINRA

2.
Principal Sanction:
Other
Other Sanctions: 
N/A
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
01/15/2015
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
2012032011102
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
ON JANUARY 15, 2015, FINRA ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ESTABLISH, MAINTAIN, AND ENFORCE AN ADEQUATE SUPERVISORY SYSTEM
AND WRITTEN POLICIES AND PROCEDURES CONCERNING THE CERTIFICATION OF CUSTOMER SIGNATURES ON CERTAIN DOCUMENTS IN VIOLATION OF
NASD RULES 3010(A) AND (B), NASD RULE 2110 (FOR THE PERIOD BEFORE DECEMBER 15, 2008) AND FINRA RULE 2010 (FOR THE PERIOD ON OR AFTER
DECEMBER 15, 2008). ON JANUARY 15, 2015, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, ENTERED INTO A LETTER OF
ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT (AWC) WITH FINRA. PURSUANT TO THE AWC, EDWARD JONES WAS CENSURED AND ORDERED TO PAY A FINE OF
$60,000. THE FINE WAS PAID ON JANUARY 21, 2015.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
01/15/2015
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 60,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
ON JANUARY 15, 2015, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, ENTERED INTO A LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER
AND CONSENT (AWC) WITH FINRA. PURSUANT TO THE AWC, EDWARD JONES WAS CENSURED AND ORDERED TO PAY A FINE OF $60,000. THE
FINE WAS PAID ON JANUARY 21, 2015.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 53PDF pages 331–333
Regulator name — filed text
FINRA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 75,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)

Action status / disposition — filed text

SEE ABOVE.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

ON JANUARY 23, 2015, FINRA ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ESTABLISH, MAINTAIN, AND ENFORCE AN ADEQUATE SUPERVISORY SYSTEM, INCLUDING A WRITTEN SUPERVISORY CONTROL SYSTEM, TO PREVENT UNAUTHORIZED TRANSFERS OF CLIENT FUNDS TO THIRD-PARTY ACCOUNTS IN VIOLATION OF NASD RULES 3010, 3012(A)(2)(B)(I), AND 2110 AND FINRA RULE 2010. ON JANUARY 23, 2015, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, ENTERED INTO A LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT (AWC) WITH FINRA. PURSUANT TO THE AWC, EDWARD JONES WAS CENSURED AND ORDERED TO PAY A FINE OF $75,000. THE FINE WAS PAID ON FEBRUARY 3, 2015.

Sanction detail — filed text

ON JANUARY 23, 2015, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, ENTERED INTO A LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT (AWC) WITH FINRA. PURSUANT TO THE AWC, EDWARD JONES WAS CENSURED AND ORDERED TO PAY A FINE OF $75,000. THE FINE WAS PAID ON FEBRUARY 3, 2015.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,

11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FINRA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other
Other Sanctions: 
N/A
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
01/23/2015
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
2013037060701
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):

6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
ON JANUARY 23, 2015, FINRA ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ESTABLISH, MAINTAIN, AND ENFORCE AN ADEQUATE SUPERVISORY SYSTEM,
INCLUDING A WRITTEN SUPERVISORY CONTROL SYSTEM, TO PREVENT UNAUTHORIZED TRANSFERS OF CLIENT FUNDS TO THIRD-PARTY ACCOUNTS IN
VIOLATION OF NASD RULES 3010, 3012(A)(2)(B)(I), AND 2110 AND FINRA RULE 2010. ON JANUARY 23, 2015, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR
DENYING THE FINDINGS, ENTERED INTO A LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT (AWC) WITH FINRA. PURSUANT TO THE AWC, EDWARD
JONES WAS CENSURED AND ORDERED TO PAY A FINE OF $75,000. THE FINE WAS PAID ON FEBRUARY 3, 2015.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
01/23/2015
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 75,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
ON JANUARY 23, 2015, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, ENTERED INTO A LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER
AND CONSENT (AWC) WITH FINRA. PURSUANT TO THE AWC, EDWARD JONES WAS CENSURED AND ORDERED TO PAY A FINE OF $75,000. THE
FINE WAS PAID ON FEBRUARY 3, 2015.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
SEE ABOVE.
regulatory · block 54PDF pages 333–335
Regulator name — filed text
FINRA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 10,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

ON JUNE 4, 2015, FINRA ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES FAILED TO CAPTURE THE CORRECT TIME OF TRADE EXECUTION FOR TRANSACTIONS IN TRADE REPORTING AND COMPLIANCE ENGINE (TRACE)-ELIGIBLE SECURITIZED PRODUCTS, FAILED TO REPORT TO TRACE THE CORRECT TIME OF TRADE EXECUTION FOR THOSE TRANSACTIONS, AND FAILED TO SHOW THE CORRECT TIME OF EXECUTION ON THE MEMORANDUM OF BROKERAGE ORDERS IN VIOLATION OF FINRA RULE 6730(C)(8), RULE 17A-3 UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AND FINRA RULES 2010 AND 4511. ON JUNE 4, 2015, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, ENTERED INTO A LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT (AWC) WITH FINRA. PURSUANT TO THE AWC, EDWARD JONES WAS CENSURED AND ORDERED TO PAY A FINE OF $10,000. THE FINE WAS PAID ON JUNE 18, 2015.

Sanction detail — filed text

ON JUNE 4, 2015, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, ENTERED INTO A LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT (AWC) WITH FINRA. PURSUANT TO THE AWC, EDWARD JONES WAS CENSURED AND ORDERED TO PAY A FINE OF $10,000. THE FINE WAS PAID ON JUNE 18, 2015.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the

same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FINRA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
06/04/2015
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
2014041068801
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other
Other Product Types: 
SECURITIZED PRODUCTS
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
ON JUNE 4, 2015, FINRA ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES FAILED TO CAPTURE THE CORRECT TIME OF TRADE EXECUTION FOR TRANSACTIONS IN TRADE
REPORTING AND COMPLIANCE ENGINE (TRACE)-ELIGIBLE SECURITIZED PRODUCTS, FAILED TO REPORT TO TRACE THE CORRECT TIME OF TRADE
EXECUTION FOR THOSE TRANSACTIONS, AND FAILED TO SHOW THE CORRECT TIME OF EXECUTION ON THE MEMORANDUM OF BROKERAGE ORDERS IN
VIOLATION OF FINRA RULE 6730(C)(8), RULE 17A-3 UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AND FINRA RULES 2010 AND 4511. ON JUNE 4,
2015, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, ENTERED INTO A LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT (AWC)
WITH FINRA. PURSUANT TO THE AWC, EDWARD JONES WAS CENSURED AND ORDERED TO PAY A FINE OF $10,000. THE FINE WAS PAID ON JUNE 18,
2015.

8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
06/04/2015
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 10,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
ON JUNE 4, 2015, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, ENTERED INTO A LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND
CONSENT (AWC) WITH FINRA. PURSUANT TO THE AWC, EDWARD JONES WAS CENSURED AND ORDERED TO PAY A FINE OF $10,000. THE FINE
WAS PAID ON JUNE 18, 2015.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 55PDF pages 335–337
Regulator name — filed text
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 15,000,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Order

Action status / disposition — filed text

REFER TO PART II, ITEM 12(C.) OF THIS REGULATORY ACTION DISCLOSURE REPORTING PAGE FOR A DISCUSSION OF THE MONETARY SANCTIONS AGREED TO AS PART OF THE SETTLEMENT. THE SETTLEMENT PROVIDES FOR THE FOLLOWING SCHEDULE WITH RESPECT TO DISGORGEMENT: (1) EDWARD JONES SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADMINISTERING THE DISGORGEMENT; (2) WITHIN 60 DAYS OF AUGUST 13, 2015 (THE "ORDER DATE"), EDWARD JONES SHALL SUBMIT TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION STAFF ("SEC STAFF"), FOR ITS REVIEW AND APPROVAL, A PROPOSED CALCULATION FOR THE DISBURSEMENT OF THE DISGORGEMENT; (3) EDWARD JONES SHALL COMPLETE THE TRANSMISSION OF ALL AMOUNTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED CALCULATION WITHIN 120 DAYS OF THE ORDER DATE; AND (4) EDWARD JONES SHALL SUBMIT TO THE SEC STAFF , FOR ITS REVIEW AND APPROVAL THE FINAL ACCOUNTING FOR THE DISGORGEMENT WITHIN 180 DAYS OF THE ORDER DATE. PURSUANT TO THE SETTLEMENT, THE SEC STAFF MAY EXTEND THESE DATES FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

ON AUGUST 13, 2015, THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ("SEC") ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES VIOLATED SECTIONS 17(A)(2) AND (3) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 ("SECURITIES ACT"), SECTIONS 15B(C)(1) AND 15(B)(4)(E) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 ("EXCHANGE ACT"), AND MUNICIPAL SECURITIES RULEMAKING BOARD ("MSRB") RULES G-17, G-11(B) AND (D), G-27 AND G-30(A) IN CONNECTION WITH IMPROPER PRACTICES INVOLVING MUNICIPAL SECURITIES. IN ENTERING INTO THE SETTLEMENT, THE SEC CONSIDERED REMEDIAL ACTS UNDERTAKEN BY EDWARD JONES RELATED TO THIS MATTER.

Sanction detail — filed text

ON AUGUST 13, 2015, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS AND SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE PROCEEDINGS, ENTERED INTO A SETTLEMENT IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE AND CEASE-AND-DESIST PROCEEDINGS WITH THE SEC. PURSUANT TO THE SETTLEMENT, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY DISGORGEMENT AND PREJUDGMENT INTEREST OF $5,194,401.37 ("DISGORGEMENT") FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING PAYMENTS TO CURRENT AND FORMER CUSTOMERS OF EDWARD JONES AND TO PAY A CIVIL MONEY PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $15,000,000 ("CIVIL PENALTY"). ON AUGUST 21, 2015, THE DISGORGEMENT WAS DEPOSITED INTO A SEGREGATED CASH ACCOUNT AT EDWARD JONES. THE CIVIL PENALTY WAS PAID ON AUGUST 20, 2015.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE

No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other
Other Sanctions: 
N/A
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/13/2015
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
3-16751
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Debt - Municipal
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
ON AUGUST 13, 2015, THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ("SEC") ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES VIOLATED SECTIONS 17(A)(2) AND (3) OF
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 ("SECURITIES ACT"), SECTIONS 15B(C)(1) AND 15(B)(4)(E) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 ("EXCHANGE
ACT"), AND MUNICIPAL SECURITIES RULEMAKING BOARD ("MSRB") RULES G-17, G-11(B) AND (D), G-27 AND G-30(A) IN CONNECTION WITH IMPROPER
PRACTICES INVOLVING MUNICIPAL SECURITIES. IN ENTERING INTO THE SETTLEMENT, THE SEC CONSIDERED REMEDIAL ACTS UNDERTAKEN BY EDWARD
JONES RELATED TO THIS MATTER.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Order
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
08/13/2015
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:

12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 15,000,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
PREJUDGMENT INTEREST; RECORD PRESERVATION
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
ON AUGUST 13, 2015, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS AND SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE PROCEEDINGS,
ENTERED INTO A SETTLEMENT IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE AND CEASE-AND-DESIST PROCEEDINGS WITH THE SEC. PURSUANT TO THE
SETTLEMENT, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY DISGORGEMENT AND PREJUDGMENT INTEREST OF $5,194,401.37 ("DISGORGEMENT") FOR THE
PURPOSE OF MAKING PAYMENTS TO CURRENT AND FORMER CUSTOMERS OF EDWARD JONES AND TO PAY A CIVIL MONEY PENALTY IN THE
AMOUNT OF $15,000,000 ("CIVIL PENALTY"). ON AUGUST 21, 2015, THE DISGORGEMENT WAS DEPOSITED INTO A SEGREGATED CASH ACCOUNT
AT EDWARD JONES. THE CIVIL PENALTY WAS PAID ON AUGUST 20, 2015.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
REFER TO PART II, ITEM 12(C.) OF THIS REGULATORY ACTION DISCLOSURE REPORTING PAGE FOR A DISCUSSION OF THE MONETARY SANCTIONS
AGREED TO AS PART OF THE SETTLEMENT. THE SETTLEMENT PROVIDES FOR THE FOLLOWING SCHEDULE WITH RESPECT TO DISGORGEMENT: (1)
EDWARD JONES SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADMINISTERING THE DISGORGEMENT; (2) WITHIN 60 DAYS OF AUGUST 13, 2015 (THE "ORDER DATE"),
EDWARD JONES SHALL SUBMIT TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION STAFF ("SEC STAFF"), FOR ITS REVIEW AND APPROVAL, A PROPOSED
CALCULATION FOR THE DISBURSEMENT OF THE DISGORGEMENT; (3) EDWARD JONES SHALL COMPLETE THE TRANSMISSION OF ALL AMOUNTS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED CALCULATION WITHIN 120 DAYS OF THE ORDER DATE; AND (4) EDWARD JONES SHALL SUBMIT TO THE SEC STAFF ,
FOR ITS REVIEW AND APPROVAL THE FINAL ACCOUNTING FOR THE DISGORGEMENT WITHIN 180 DAYS OF THE ORDER DATE. PURSUANT TO THE
SETTLEMENT, THE SEC STAFF MAY EXTEND THESE DATES FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN.
regulatory · block 56PDF pages 337–339
Regulator name — filed text
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Order
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

ON SEPTEMBER 30, 2015, THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ("SEC") ALLEGED THAT CERTAIN SECURITY FIRMS, INCLUDING EDWARD JONES, VIOLATED SECTION 17(A)(2) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 ("SECURITIES ACT") AS IT RELATES TO CERTAIN STATEMENTS OF MUNICIPAL ISSUERS REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH PREVIOUS CONTINUING DISCLOSURE OBLIGATIONS IN OFFICIAL STATEMENTS. EDWARD JONES SELF- REPORTED THE AFOREMENTIONED VIOLATIONS TO THE SEC PURSUANT TO ITS MUNICIPALITIES CONTINUING DISCLOSURE COOPERATION (MCDC) INITIATIVE. EDWARD JONES IS ONE OF FIFTY-EIGHT FIRMS PARTICIPATING IN THE MCDC INITIATIVE.

Sanction detail — filed text

ON SEPTEMBER 30, 2015, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, ENTERED INTO A PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE SETTLEMENT WITH THE SEC REGARDING THE MATTERS SELF-REPORTED BY EDWARD JONES PURSUANT TO THE SEC'S MCDC INITIATIVE. PURSUANT TO THE SETTLEMENT, THE SEC ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES VIOLATED SECTION 17(A)(2) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 AND WAS ORDERED TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM COMMITTING OR CAUSING ANY VIOLATIONS AND ANY FUTURE VIOLATIONS OF SECTION 17(A)(2). THE SETTLEMENT ALSO REQUIRES EDWARD JONES TO PAY A CIVIL MONEY PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000 AND TO COMPLY WITH THE UNDERTAKINGS ENUMERATED IN THE SETTLEMENT. THE CIVIL MONEY PENALTY WAS PAID ON OCTOBER 13, 2015.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is

registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Cease and Desist
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
09/30/2015
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
3-16867
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Debt - Municipal
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
ON SEPTEMBER 30, 2015, THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ("SEC") ALLEGED THAT CERTAIN SECURITY FIRMS, INCLUDING EDWARD
JONES, VIOLATED SECTION 17(A)(2) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 ("SECURITIES ACT") AS IT RELATES TO CERTAIN STATEMENTS OF MUNICIPAL
ISSUERS REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH PREVIOUS CONTINUING DISCLOSURE OBLIGATIONS IN OFFICIAL STATEMENTS. EDWARD JONES SELF-
REPORTED THE AFOREMENTIONED VIOLATIONS TO THE SEC PURSUANT TO ITS MUNICIPALITIES CONTINUING DISCLOSURE COOPERATION (MCDC)
INITIATIVE. EDWARD JONES IS ONE OF FIFTY-EIGHT FIRMS PARTICIPATING IN THE MCDC INITIATIVE.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Order
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
09/30/2015
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution

 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
ON SEPTEMBER 30, 2015, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, ENTERED INTO A PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE
SETTLEMENT WITH THE SEC REGARDING THE MATTERS SELF-REPORTED BY EDWARD JONES PURSUANT TO THE SEC'S MCDC INITIATIVE.
PURSUANT TO THE SETTLEMENT, THE SEC ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES VIOLATED SECTION 17(A)(2) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 AND
WAS ORDERED TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM COMMITTING OR CAUSING ANY VIOLATIONS AND ANY FUTURE VIOLATIONS OF SECTION 17(A)(2).
THE SETTLEMENT ALSO REQUIRES EDWARD JONES TO PAY A CIVIL MONEY PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000 AND TO COMPLY WITH THE
UNDERTAKINGS ENUMERATED IN THE SETTLEMENT. THE CIVIL MONEY PENALTY WAS PAID ON OCTOBER 13, 2015.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 57PDF pages 339–341
Regulator name — filed text
FINRA
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

ON OCTOBER 26, 2015, FINRA ALLEGED EDWARD JONES VIOLATED CERTAIN FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS OR RULES BY NOT ENSURING APPLICABLE SALES CHARGE WAIVERS WERE RECEIVED FOR MUTUAL FUND PURCHASES IN CERTAIN RETIREMENT PLAN AND CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION ACCOUNTS. ON MAY 5, 2015, FINRA'S ENFORCEMENT DIVISION ADVISED EDWARD JONES THAT IT WAS INVESTIGATING THIS ISSUE. PRIOR TO BEING ADVISED OF THE INVESTIGATION, EDWARD JONES HAD COMMENCED A REVIEW OF THIS ISSUE AND SELF-REPORTED TO FINRA.

Sanction detail — filed text

ON OCTOBER 26, 2015, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, ENTERED INTO AN ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT (AWC) WITH FINRA TO RESOLVE THIS MATTER. PURSUANT TO THE AWC, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PROVIDE REMEDIATION TO CERTAIN CUSTOMERS, ESTIMATED AT THE TIME OF THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT TO BE APPROXIMATELY $13.5 MILLION. A MONETARY PENALTY WAS NOT IMPOSED BY FINRA. IN REACHING THE AWC, FINRA RECOGNIZED THE EXTRAORDINARY COOPERATION OF EDWARD JONES, INCLUDING ITS SELF-REPORTING OF THE ISSUE TO FINRA.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No

NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FINRA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
10/26/2015
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
2015045354201
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
ON OCTOBER 26, 2015, FINRA ALLEGED EDWARD JONES VIOLATED CERTAIN FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS OR RULES BY NOT ENSURING APPLICABLE
SALES CHARGE WAIVERS WERE RECEIVED FOR MUTUAL FUND PURCHASES IN CERTAIN RETIREMENT PLAN AND CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION ACCOUNTS.
ON MAY 5, 2015, FINRA'S ENFORCEMENT DIVISION ADVISED EDWARD JONES THAT IT WAS INVESTIGATING THIS ISSUE. PRIOR TO BEING ADVISED OF
THE INVESTIGATION, EDWARD JONES HAD COMMENCED A REVIEW OF THIS ISSUE AND SELF-REPORTED TO FINRA.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
10/26/2015
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
INTEREST
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
ON OCTOBER 26, 2015, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, ENTERED INTO AN ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND
CONSENT (AWC) WITH FINRA TO RESOLVE THIS MATTER. PURSUANT TO THE AWC, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PROVIDE REMEDIATION TO
CERTAIN CUSTOMERS, ESTIMATED AT THE TIME OF THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT TO BE APPROXIMATELY $13.5 MILLION. A MONETARY PENALTY
WAS NOT IMPOSED BY FINRA. IN REACHING THE AWC, FINRA RECOGNIZED THE EXTRAORDINARY COOPERATION OF EDWARD JONES, INCLUDING
ITS SELF-REPORTING OF THE ISSUE TO FINRA.

13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 58PDF pages 341–342
Regulator name — filed text
FINRA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 200,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

FINRA ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES VIOLATED CERTAIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES RULEMAKING BOARD RULES IN CONNECTION WITH SHORT POSITIONS IN CERTAIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES.

Sanction detail — filed text

ON JANUARY 21, 2016, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, ENTERED INTO A LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT (AWC) WITH FINRA TO RESOLVE THIS MATTER. PURSUANT TO THE AWC, EDWARD JONES WAS CENSURED AND ORDERED TO PAY A FINE OF $200,000. THE FINE WAS PAID ON FEBRUARY 8, 2016.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FINRA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 

01/21/2016
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
2015045548001
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Debt - Municipal
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
FINRA ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES VIOLATED CERTAIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES RULEMAKING BOARD RULES IN CONNECTION WITH SHORT
POSITIONS IN CERTAIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
01/21/2016
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 200,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
ON JANUARY 21, 2016, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, ENTERED INTO A LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER
AND CONSENT (AWC) WITH FINRA TO RESOLVE THIS MATTER. PURSUANT TO THE AWC, EDWARD JONES WAS CENSURED AND ORDERED TO PAY A
FINE OF $200,000. THE FINE WAS PAID ON FEBRUARY 8, 2016.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 59PDF pages 342–344
Regulator name — filed text
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND SECURITIES
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 135,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Order
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND SECURITIES (THE "DEPARTMENT"), ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES FAILED TO REASONABLY SUPERVISE AN AGENT IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 305(A)(VII) OF THE PENNSYLVANIA SECURITIES ACT OF 1972 (THE "ACT").

Sanction detail — filed text

ON AUGUST 4, 2016, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE ALLEGATIONS, ENTERED INTO A CONSENT AGREEMENT AND ORDER ("ORDER") WITH THE DEPARTMENT. PURSUANT TO THE ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO COMPLY WITH THE ACT, AND PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE ASSESSMENT OF $135,000.00 AND INVESTIGATIVE COSTS OF $10,000.00 TO THE DEPARTMENT. THESE AMOUNTS WERE PAID ON AUGUST 11, 2016.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.

Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND SECURITIES
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/04/2016
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
160043 (SEC-CAO)
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND SECURITIES (THE "DEPARTMENT"), ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES FAILED TO
REASONABLY SUPERVISE AN AGENT IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 305(A)(VII) OF THE PENNSYLVANIA SECURITIES ACT OF 1972 (THE "ACT").
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final

9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Order
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
08/04/2016
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 135,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
INVESTIGATIVE COSTS OF $10,000.00
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
ON AUGUST 4, 2016, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE ALLEGATIONS, ENTERED INTO A CONSENT AGREEMENT AND ORDER
("ORDER") WITH THE DEPARTMENT. PURSUANT TO THE ORDER, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO COMPLY WITH THE ACT, AND PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE
ASSESSMENT OF $135,000.00 AND INVESTIGATIVE COSTS OF $10,000.00 TO THE DEPARTMENT. THESE AMOUNTS WERE PAID ON AUGUST 11,
2016.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 60EDWARD JONES (ONTARIO, L.P.)PDF pages 344–346
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
EDWARD JONES (ONTARIO, L.P.)
Regulator name — filed text
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 250,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Settled

Action status / disposition — filed text

SEE ABOVE.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA ("IIROC") ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES (ONTARIO, L.P.) ("EDWARD JONES CANADA") FAILED TO ADEQUATELY SUPERVISE RETAIL ACCOUNTS IN VIOLATION OF IIROC DEALER MEMBER RULES 38.1 AND 2500.

Sanction detail — filed text

ON OCTOBER 28, 2016, EDWARD JONES CANADA AND IIROC ENTERED INTO A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. PURSUANT TO THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, EDWARD JONES CANADA AGREED TO PAY A FINE OF C$250,000 AND COSTS OF C$50,000. THESE AMOUNTS WERE PAID BY EDWARD JONES CANADA BY OCTOBER 31, 2016.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE

CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
EDWARD JONES (ONTARIO,
L.P.)
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
10/25/2016
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
16-0260
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
EDWARD JONES (ONTARIO, L.P.)
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA ("IIROC") ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES (ONTARIO, L.P.) ("EDWARD JONES
CANADA") FAILED TO ADEQUATELY SUPERVISE RETAIL ACCOUNTS IN VIOLATION OF IIROC DEALER MEMBER RULES 38.1 AND 2500.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Settled
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):

10/28/2016
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 250,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
ON OCTOBER 28, 2016, EDWARD JONES CANADA AND IIROC ENTERED INTO A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. PURSUANT TO THE SETTLEMENT
AGREEMENT, EDWARD JONES CANADA AGREED TO PAY A FINE OF C$250,000 AND COSTS OF C$50,000. THESE AMOUNTS WERE PAID BY EDWARD
JONES CANADA BY OCTOBER 31, 2016.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
SEE ABOVE.
regulatory · block 61PDF pages 346–348
Regulator name — filed text
FINRA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 125,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

FINRA ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT ADEQUATELY SUPERVISE ITS SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING THE INTEREST RATE APPLIED TO CERTAIN MARGIN LOANS TO CUSTOMERS IN VIOLATION OF NASD RULE 3010(A) AND FINRA RULES 2010 AND 3110(A).

Sanction detail — filed text

ON FEBRUARY 1, 2017, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE ALLEGATIONS, ENTERED INTO A LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER, AND CONSENT ("AWC") WITH FINRA TO RESOLVE THIS MATTER. PURSUANT TO THE AWC, EDWARD JONES WAS CENSURED AND FINED $125,000. THE FINE WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AWC. IN RESOLVING THIS MATTER, FINRA RECOGNIZED THE EXTRAORDINARY COOPERATION OF EDWARD JONES.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.

This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FINRA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other
Other Sanctions: 
N/A
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
02/01/2017
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
2016048760501
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other
Other Product Types: 
MARGIN LOANS
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
FINRA ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES DID NOT ADEQUATELY SUPERVISE ITS SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING THE INTEREST RATE APPLIED TO CERTAIN
MARGIN LOANS TO CUSTOMERS IN VIOLATION OF NASD RULE 3010(A) AND FINRA RULES 2010 AND 3110(A).
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
02/01/2017
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 125,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,

disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
ON FEBRUARY 1, 2017, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE ALLEGATIONS, ENTERED INTO A LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE,
WAIVER, AND CONSENT ("AWC") WITH FINRA TO RESOLVE THIS MATTER. PURSUANT TO THE AWC, EDWARD JONES WAS CENSURED AND FINED
$125,000. THE FINE WILL BE PAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AWC. IN RESOLVING THIS MATTER, FINRA RECOGNIZED THE EXTRAORDINARY
COOPERATION OF EDWARD JONES.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 62PDF pages 348–349
Regulator name — filed text
FINRA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 210,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

FINRA ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES VIOLATED MUNICIPAL SECURITIES RULEMAKING BOARD RULES G-15(F), G-15(F)(III), G-17, AND G-47 IN CONNECTION WITH TRANSACTIONS IN CERTAIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES IN AMOUNTS LOWER THAN THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM DENOMINATIONS OCCURRING DURING THE TIME PERIOD OF DECEMBER 1, 2013 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2014.

Sanction detail — filed text

ON JUNE 2, 2017, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE ALLEGATIONS, ENTERED INTO A LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER, AND CONSENT ("AWC") WITH FINRA TO RESOLVE THIS MATTER. PURSUANT TO THE AWC, EDWARD JONES WAS CENSURED, FINED $210,000 AND REQUIRED TO SUBMIT TO FINRA PROOF OF AN OFFER OF RESCISSION OR OF DOCUMENTED EFFORTS UNDERTAKEN TO EFFECT RESCISSION. THE FINE WAS PAID ON JUNE 29, 2017.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FINRA

2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
FOR SANCTIONS, REFER TO ITEM 12 BELOW.
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
06/02/2017
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
2015046579901
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Debt - Municipal
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
FINRA ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES VIOLATED MUNICIPAL SECURITIES RULEMAKING BOARD RULES G-15(F), G-15(F)(III), G-17, AND G-47 IN
CONNECTION WITH TRANSACTIONS IN CERTAIN MUNICIPAL SECURITIES IN AMOUNTS LOWER THAN THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM DENOMINATIONS
OCCURRING DURING THE TIME PERIOD OF DECEMBER 1, 2013 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2014.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
06/02/2017
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 210,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKING
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
ON JUNE 2, 2017, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE ALLEGATIONS, ENTERED INTO A LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER,
AND CONSENT ("AWC") WITH FINRA TO RESOLVE THIS MATTER. PURSUANT TO THE AWC, EDWARD JONES WAS CENSURED, FINED $210,000 AND
REQUIRED TO SUBMIT TO FINRA PROOF OF AN OFFER OF RESCISSION OR OF DOCUMENTED EFFORTS UNDERTAKEN TO EFFECT RESCISSION. THE
FINE WAS PAID ON JUNE 29, 2017.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 63PDF pages 349–351
Regulator name — filed text
FINRA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 725,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

FINRA ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ESTABLISH, MAINTAIN, AND ENFORCE AN ADEQUATE SUPERVISORY SYSTEM, INCLUDING WRITTEN PROCEDURES, CONCERNING THE CREATION AND DISSEMINATION OF CONSOLIDATED REPORTS IN VIOLATION OF NASD RULE 3010(A) AND FINRA RULE 2010 DURING THE TIME PERIOD APRIL 2010 THROUGH 2014.

Sanction detail — filed text

ON JULY 13, 2017, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE ALLEGATIONS, ENTERED INTO A LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER, AND CONSENT ("AWC") WITH FINRA TO RESOLVE THIS MATTER. PURSUANT TO THE AWC, EDWARD JONES WAS CENSURED AND FINED $725,000. IN RESOLVING THIS MATTER, FINRA ALSO STATED THAT EDWARD JONES HAS MADE CHANGES TO ENHANCE ITS SUPERVISORY PROCESSES. THE FINE WAS PAID ON JULY 25, 2017.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.

Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FINRA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
FOR SANCTIONS, REFER TO ITEM 12 BELOW.
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
07/13/2017
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
2016049783001
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):

6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
FINRA ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES FAILED TO ESTABLISH, MAINTAIN, AND ENFORCE AN ADEQUATE SUPERVISORY SYSTEM, INCLUDING WRITTEN
PROCEDURES, CONCERNING THE CREATION AND DISSEMINATION OF CONSOLIDATED REPORTS IN VIOLATION OF NASD RULE 3010(A) AND FINRA RULE
2010 DURING THE TIME PERIOD APRIL 2010 THROUGH 2014.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
07/13/2017
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 725,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
ON JULY 13, 2017, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE ALLEGATIONS, ENTERED INTO A LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER,
AND CONSENT ("AWC") WITH FINRA TO RESOLVE THIS MATTER. PURSUANT TO THE AWC, EDWARD JONES WAS CENSURED AND FINED $725,000.
IN RESOLVING THIS MATTER, FINRA ALSO STATED THAT EDWARD JONES HAS MADE CHANGES TO ENHANCE ITS SUPERVISORY PROCESSES. THE
FINE WAS PAID ON JULY 25, 2017.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 64PDF pages 351–353
Regulator name — filed text
ARKANSAS SECURITIES DEPARTMENT
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 50,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

THE ARKANSAS SECURITIES DEPARTMENT ALLEGED THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO ADEQUATELY SUPERVISE THE ACTIVITIES OF AN AGENT, PROPERLY DISCLOSE A COMPLAINT AND SETTLEMENT RELATED TO THE AGENT, UPDATE AND DISCLOSE INFORMATION THAT THE AGENT WAS THE SUBJECT OF AN INTERNAL REVIEW AT THE TIME OF TERMINATION, AND MAKE AND KEEP BOOKS AND RECORDS IN VIOLATION OF ARK. CODE ANN. §§ 23­42­301(F)(1) AND 23-42-306, RULES OF THE ARKANSAS SECURITIES COMMISSIONER 301.01(C)(2)(F), 301.01(C)(5), 306.02, AND 308.01(X), AND FINRA BY-LAW ARTICLE V, SECTION 3.

Sanction detail — filed text

ON SEPTEMBER 13, 2018, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE ALLEGATIONS, ENTERED INTO A CONSENT ORDER WITH THE ARKANSAS SECURITIES DEPARTMENT TO RESOLVE THIS MATTER. PURSUANT TO THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES SHALL CONDUCT A REVIEW OF ITS SUPERVISORY PROVISIONS AND PRACTICES, UPDATE THE AGENT'S U-5, AND PAY A FINE OF $50,000. THE FINE WAS PAID ON SEPTEMBER 12, 2018.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I

A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
ARKANSAS SECURITIES DEPARTMENT
2.
Principal Sanction:
Undertaking
Other Sanctions: 
EDWARD JONES SHOULD REVIEW CURRENT SUPERVISORY PROVISIONS AND PRACTICES. UPDATE AGENT'S U-5. PAY FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF
$50,000.00.
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
03/09/2016
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
S-16-0017
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE ARKANSAS SECURITIES DEPARTMENT ALLEGED THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO ADEQUATELY SUPERVISE THE ACTIVITIES OF AN AGENT, PROPERLY
DISCLOSE A COMPLAINT AND SETTLEMENT RELATED TO THE AGENT, UPDATE AND DISCLOSE INFORMATION THAT THE AGENT WAS THE SUBJECT OF AN
INTERNAL REVIEW AT THE TIME OF TERMINATION, AND MAKE AND KEEP BOOKS AND RECORDS IN VIOLATION OF ARK. CODE ANN. §§ 23­42­301(F)(1)
AND 23-42-306, RULES OF THE ARKANSAS SECURITIES COMMISSIONER 301.01(C)(2)(F), 301.01(C)(5), 306.02, AND 308.01(X), AND FINRA BY-LAW
ARTICLE V, SECTION 3.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:

If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
09/13/2018
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 50,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
ON SEPTEMBER 13, 2018, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE ALLEGATIONS, ENTERED INTO A CONSENT ORDER WITH THE
ARKANSAS SECURITIES DEPARTMENT TO RESOLVE THIS MATTER. PURSUANT TO THE CONSENT ORDER, EDWARD JONES SHALL CONDUCT A
REVIEW OF ITS SUPERVISORY PROVISIONS AND PRACTICES, UPDATE THE AGENT'S U-5, AND PAY A FINE OF $50,000. THE FINE WAS PAID ON
SEPTEMBER 12, 2018.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 65PDF pages 353–355
Regulator name — filed text
FINRA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 40,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

FINRA ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES VIOLATED FINRA RULES 1122 AND 2010 AND ARTICLE V, SECTION 2 OF FINRA'S BY-LAWS BY FILING FORMS U4 CONTAINING MISLEADING INFORMATION ABOUT THE AMOUNT OF ALLEGED DAMAGES IN CUSTOMERS' COMPLAINTS. FINRA FURTHER ALLEGED THAT THE FIRM'S DISCLOSURES TO FINRA OF CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS UNDERSTATED THE CUSTOMERS' ALLEGED DAMAGES, AND RESULTED FROM A MISUNDERSTANDING BY CERTAIN OF ITS ASSOCIATES ABOUT THE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS FOR DISCLOSURES REGARDING CUSTOMERS' COMPLAINTS. WHEN FINRA IDENTIFIED THE INACCURACIES, EDWARD JONES PROMPTLY UPDATED THE FORMS U4 AT ISSUE TO REFLECT THE SPECIFIC AMOUNTS OF THE CUSTOMERS' ALLEGED DAMAGES, PROVIDED ADDITIONAL TRAINING TO ITS ASSOCIATES, AND INSTITUTED ADDITIONAL SAFEGUARDS FOR ITS PROCESS OF DISCLOSING CUSTOMERS' COMPLAINTS.

Sanction detail — filed text

ON JUNE 19, 2019, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE ALLEGATIONS, ENTERED INTO AN ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER, AND CONSENT ("AWC") WITH FINRA TO RESOLVE THIS MATTER. PURSUANT TO THE AWC, EDWARD JONES WAS CENSURED, FINED $40,000, AND ORDERED TO CERTIFY IN WRITING THAT THE FIRM HAS REVIEWED ITS SYSTEMS, POLICIES, AND PROCEDURES, WRITTEN OR OTHERWISE, GOVERNING THE FIRM'S REVIEW, ANALYSIS, AND DISCLOSURE OF ALLEGED DAMAGES IN CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS AND THAT THE FIRM HAS ESTABLISHED AND IMPLEMENTED SYSTEMS, POLICIES, AND PROCEDURES, WRITTEN AND OTHERWISE, GOVERNING THE REVIEW, ANALYSIS AND DISCLOSURE OF ALLEGED DAMAGES IN CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS THAT ARE REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE WITH FINRA RULES. THE FINE WAS PAID ON JULY 5, 2019 AND THE CERTIFICATION WAS FILED WITH FINRA ON JULY 9, 2019.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed

This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FINRA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other
Other Sanctions: 
N/A
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
06/19/2019
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
2018056422401
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
FINRA ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES VIOLATED FINRA RULES 1122 AND 2010 AND ARTICLE V, SECTION 2 OF FINRA'S BY-LAWS BY FILING FORMS U4
CONTAINING MISLEADING INFORMATION ABOUT THE AMOUNT OF ALLEGED DAMAGES IN CUSTOMERS' COMPLAINTS. FINRA FURTHER ALLEGED THAT THE
FIRM'S DISCLOSURES TO FINRA OF CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS UNDERSTATED THE CUSTOMERS' ALLEGED DAMAGES, AND RESULTED FROM A
MISUNDERSTANDING BY CERTAIN OF ITS ASSOCIATES ABOUT THE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS FOR DISCLOSURES REGARDING CUSTOMERS'
COMPLAINTS. WHEN FINRA IDENTIFIED THE INACCURACIES, EDWARD JONES PROMPTLY UPDATED THE FORMS U4 AT ISSUE TO REFLECT THE SPECIFIC
AMOUNTS OF THE CUSTOMERS' ALLEGED DAMAGES, PROVIDED ADDITIONAL TRAINING TO ITS ASSOCIATES, AND INSTITUTED ADDITIONAL SAFEGUARDS
FOR ITS PROCESS OF DISCLOSING CUSTOMERS' COMPLAINTS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
06/19/2019
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:

12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 40,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKING
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
ON JUNE 19, 2019, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE ALLEGATIONS, ENTERED INTO AN ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER, AND
CONSENT ("AWC") WITH FINRA TO RESOLVE THIS MATTER. PURSUANT TO THE AWC, EDWARD JONES WAS CENSURED, FINED $40,000, AND
ORDERED TO CERTIFY IN WRITING THAT THE FIRM HAS REVIEWED ITS SYSTEMS, POLICIES, AND PROCEDURES, WRITTEN OR OTHERWISE,
GOVERNING THE FIRM'S REVIEW, ANALYSIS, AND DISCLOSURE OF ALLEGED DAMAGES IN CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS AND THAT THE FIRM HAS
ESTABLISHED AND IMPLEMENTED SYSTEMS, POLICIES, AND PROCEDURES, WRITTEN AND OTHERWISE, GOVERNING THE REVIEW, ANALYSIS AND
DISCLOSURE OF ALLEGED DAMAGES IN CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS THAT ARE REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE WITH FINRA
RULES. THE FINE WAS PAID ON JULY 5, 2019 AND THE CERTIFICATION WAS FILED WITH FINRA ON JULY 9, 2019.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 66PDF pages 355–357
Regulator name — filed text
SOUTH DAKOTA DIVISION OF INSURANCE, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND REGULATION
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN CONNECTION WITH A COMPLAINT BY A SOUTH DAKOTA PUBLIC CUSTOMER, THE SOUTH DAKOTA DIVISION OF INSURANCE, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND REGULATION ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES FAILED TO SUPERVISE A SINGLE FINANCIAL ADVISOR IN CONNECTION WITH THAT FINANCIAL ADVISOR'S RECOMMENDATION OF CERTAIN MUTUAL FUNDS TO THE CUSTOMER IN VIOLATION OF THE SOUTH DAKOTA SECURITIES ACT AND FINRA RULES 2010 AND 3110.

Sanction detail — filed text

ON DECEMBER 20, 2019, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE ALLEGATIONS, ENTERED INTO A CONSENT ORDER THE WITH THE SOUTH DAKOTA DIVISION OF INSURANCE, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND REGULATION (THE "DIVISION") TO RESOLVE THIS MATTER. EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY THE DIVISION $10,000 FOR THE COSTS OF THEIR INVESTIGATION AND TO MAKE AN OFFER OF SETTLEMENT TO THE CUSTOMER IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,406.47. THE OFFER OF SETTLEMENT HAS BEEN TENDERED TO THE CUSTOMER, AND A CHECK FOR THE PAYMENT OF INVESTIGATIVE COSTS WAS MAILED OVERNIGHT TO THE DIVISION ON DECEMBER 19, 2019.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the

circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
SOUTH DAKOTA DIVISION OF INSURANCE, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND REGULATION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other
Other Sanctions: 
FOR SANCTIONS, REFER TO ITEM 12 BELOW.
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
12/20/2019
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN CONNECTION WITH A COMPLAINT BY A SOUTH DAKOTA PUBLIC CUSTOMER, THE SOUTH DAKOTA DIVISION OF INSURANCE, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
AND REGULATION ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES FAILED TO SUPERVISE A SINGLE FINANCIAL ADVISOR IN CONNECTION WITH THAT FINANCIAL
ADVISOR'S RECOMMENDATION OF CERTAIN MUTUAL FUNDS TO THE CUSTOMER IN VIOLATION OF THE SOUTH DAKOTA SECURITIES ACT AND FINRA
RULES 2010 AND 3110.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/20/2019
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
INVESTIGATIVE COSTS OF $10,000; OFFER OF SETTLEMENT TO CUSTOMER OF $2,406.47
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of

penalty was waived: 
ON DECEMBER 20, 2019, EDWARD JONES, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE ALLEGATIONS, ENTERED INTO A CONSENT ORDER THE WITH
THE SOUTH DAKOTA DIVISION OF INSURANCE, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND REGULATION (THE "DIVISION") TO RESOLVE THIS MATTER. EDWARD
JONES AGREED TO PAY THE DIVISION $10,000 FOR THE COSTS OF THEIR INVESTIGATION AND TO MAKE AN OFFER OF SETTLEMENT TO THE
CUSTOMER IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,406.47. THE OFFER OF SETTLEMENT HAS BEEN TENDERED TO THE CUSTOMER, AND A CHECK FOR THE PAYMENT
OF INVESTIGATIVE COSTS WAS MAILED OVERNIGHT TO THE DIVISION ON DECEMBER 19, 2019.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 67PDF pages 357–359
Regulator name — filed text
NEVADA OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE - SECURITIES DIVISION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 50,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON AUGUST 5, 2021, AN ADMINISTRATIVE CONSENT ORDER (THE "ORDER") WAS ENTERED BY THE SECURITIES ADMINISTRATOR OF THE STATE OF NEVADA AGAINST EDWARD JONES ("EDWARD JONES" OR "THE FIRM"). EDWARD JONES CONSENTED TO THE ORDER WITHOUT EITHER ADMITTING OR DENYING THE ALLEGATIONS SET FORTH IN THE ORDER. THE ORDER ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES FAILED TO SUPERVISE A FORMER FINANCIAL ADVISOR WHO HAD OFFERED AND SOLD PERSONAL SEAT LICENSES (THE "PSLS") TO AN EDWARD JONES CLIENT WITHOUT DISCLOSING SUCH ACTIVITY TO THE FIRM. THE ORDER ALSO ALLEGED THAT THE FORMER FINANCIAL ADVISOR NEVER DELIVERED THE PSLS TO THE CLIENT. THE ORDER ALSO STATED THAT WHEN EDWARD JONES BECAME AWARE THAT THE FORMER FINANCIAL ADVISOR ENGAGED IN THIS ACTIVITY, THE FIRM IMMEDIATELY TERMINATED THE FINANCIAL ADVISOR. THE FIRM SUBSEQUENTLY MADE THE CLIENT WHOLE, INCLUSIVE OF INTEREST. THE ORDER REQUIRES EDWARD JONES TO CEASE VIOLATING, AND TO COMPLY WITH, THE NEVADA SECURITIES ACT. ADDITIONALLY, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY TO THE NEVADA SECRETARY OF STATE'S OFFICE $50,000.00 AND $2,762.57 AS A CIVIL PENALTY AND INVESTIGATORY COSTS, RESPECTIVELY. SUCH PAYMENTS WERE MAILED TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE'S OFFICE ON OR ABOUT AUGUST 9, 2021, PURSUANT TO THE TERMS OF THE ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

THE NEVADA SECURITIES DIVISION ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES FAILED TO SUPERVISE A FORMER FINANCIAL ADVISOR WHO HAD OFFERED AND SOLD PERSONAL SEAT LICENSES ("PSLS") TO AN EDWARD JONES CLIENT IN VIOLATION OF NEVADA REVISED STATUTES 90.420. THE DIVISION ALSO ALLEGED THAT THE FORMER FINANCIAL ADVISOR NEVER DELIVERED THE PSLS TO THE CLIENT.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY TO THE NEVADA SECRETARY OF STATE'S OFFICE $50,000.00 AND $2,762.57 AS A CIVIL PENALTY AND INVESTIGATORY COSTS, RESPECTIVELY. SUCH PAYMENTS WERE MAILED TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE'S OFFICE ON OR ABOUT AUGUST 9, 2021.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
NEVADA OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE - SECURITIES DIVISION

2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
CEASE AND DESIST
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/05/2021
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
INV20-096
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other
Other Product Types: 
PERSONAL SEAT LICENSES FOR PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALL TEAM
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE NEVADA SECURITIES DIVISION ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES FAILED TO SUPERVISE A FORMER FINANCIAL ADVISOR WHO HAD OFFERED AND
SOLD PERSONAL SEAT LICENSES ("PSLS") TO AN EDWARD JONES CLIENT IN VIOLATION OF NEVADA REVISED STATUTES 90.420. THE DIVISION ALSO
ALLEGED THAT THE FORMER FINANCIAL ADVISOR NEVER DELIVERED THE PSLS TO THE CLIENT.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
08/05/2021
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 50,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
INVESTIGATORY COSTS REIMBURSEMENT OF $2,762.57
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY TO THE NEVADA SECRETARY OF STATE'S OFFICE $50,000.00 AND $2,762.57 AS A CIVIL PENALTY AND
INVESTIGATORY COSTS, RESPECTIVELY. SUCH PAYMENTS WERE MAILED TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE'S OFFICE ON OR ABOUT AUGUST 9, 2021.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON AUGUST 5, 2021, AN ADMINISTRATIVE CONSENT ORDER (THE "ORDER") WAS ENTERED BY THE SECURITIES ADMINISTRATOR OF THE STATE OF
NEVADA AGAINST EDWARD JONES ("EDWARD JONES" OR "THE FIRM"). EDWARD JONES CONSENTED TO THE ORDER WITHOUT EITHER ADMITTING OR
DENYING THE ALLEGATIONS SET FORTH IN THE ORDER. THE ORDER ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES FAILED TO SUPERVISE A FORMER FINANCIAL
ADVISOR WHO HAD OFFERED AND SOLD PERSONAL SEAT LICENSES (THE "PSLS") TO AN EDWARD JONES CLIENT WITHOUT DISCLOSING SUCH ACTIVITY
TO THE FIRM. THE ORDER ALSO ALLEGED THAT THE FORMER FINANCIAL ADVISOR NEVER DELIVERED THE PSLS TO THE CLIENT. THE ORDER ALSO
STATED THAT WHEN EDWARD JONES BECAME AWARE THAT THE FORMER FINANCIAL ADVISOR ENGAGED IN THIS ACTIVITY, THE FIRM IMMEDIATELY
TERMINATED THE FINANCIAL ADVISOR. THE FIRM SUBSEQUENTLY MADE THE CLIENT WHOLE, INCLUSIVE OF INTEREST. THE ORDER REQUIRES EDWARD
JONES TO CEASE VIOLATING, AND TO COMPLY WITH, THE NEVADA SECURITIES ACT. ADDITIONALLY, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY TO THE NEVADA
SECRETARY OF STATE'S OFFICE $50,000.00 AND $2,762.57 AS A CIVIL PENALTY AND INVESTIGATORY COSTS, RESPECTIVELY. SUCH PAYMENTS WERE

MAILED TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE'S OFFICE ON OR ABOUT AUGUST 9, 2021, PURSUANT TO THE TERMS OF THE ORDER.
regulatory · block 68PDF pages 359–360
Regulator name — filed text
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, SECURITIES DIVISION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 150,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON NOVEMBER 14, 2022, EDWARD JONES ENTERED INTO A CONSENT ORDER WITH THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, SECURITIES DIVISION (THE "DIVISION"). THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, SECURITIES DIVISION (THE "DIVISION") ALLEGED THAT BETWEEN 2017 AND 2021, EDWARD JONES VIOLATED RCW 21.20.110(1)(J) BY FAILING TO SUPERVISE A FORMER FINANCIAL ADVISOR, WHO THE DIVISION ALLEGED RECEIVED PAYMENTS OF GIFTS AND LOANS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY $550,000.00 FROM AN ELDERLY CLIENT WITHOUT DISCLOSING THE PAYMENTS TO EDWARD JONES. THE DIVISION FURTHER ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES FAILED TO DETECT THE FINANCIAL ADVISOR'S UNDISCLOSED OUTSIDE BUSINESS. UPON BECOMING AWARE OF THE FINANCIAL ADVISOR'S CONDUCT, EDWARD JONES TERMINATED THE FINANCIAL ADVISOR ON DECEMBER 13, 2021. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE DIVISION'S FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO REASONABLY SUPERVISE ITS REGISTERED SECURITIES SALESPERSONS AND INVESTMENT ADVISER REPRESENTATIVES, PAY A FINE OF $150,000.00 AND INVESTIGATIVE COSTS OF $25,000.00.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, SECURITIES DIVISION (THE "DIVISION") ALLEGED THAT BETWEEN 2017 AND 2021, EDWARD JONES VIOLATED RCW 21.20.110(1)(J) BY FAILING TO SUPERVISE A FORMER FINANCIAL ADVISOR, WHO THE DIVISION ALLEGED RECEIVED PAYMENTS OF GIFTS AND LOANS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY $550,000.00 FROM AN ELDERLY CLIENT WITHOUT DISCLOSING THE PAYMENTS TO EDWARD JONES. THE DIVISION FURTHER ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES FAILED TO DETECT THE FINANCIAL ADVISOR'S UNDISCLOSED OUTSIDE BUSINESS.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, SECURITIES DIVISION A FINE OF $150,000.00 AND INVESTIGATIVE COSTS OF $25,000.00. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE BY CHECK MAILED ON OR ABOUT NOVEMBER 9, 2022.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, SECURITIES DIVISION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
11/14/2022
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:

4.
Docket/Case Number:
ORDER NUMBER S-21-3243-22-CO01
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, SECURITIES DIVISION (THE "DIVISION") ALLEGED THAT BETWEEN 2017 AND
2021, EDWARD JONES VIOLATED RCW 21.20.110(1)(J) BY FAILING TO SUPERVISE A FORMER FINANCIAL ADVISOR, WHO THE DIVISION ALLEGED
RECEIVED PAYMENTS OF GIFTS AND LOANS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY $550,000.00 FROM AN ELDERLY CLIENT WITHOUT DISCLOSING THE PAYMENTS
TO EDWARD JONES. THE DIVISION FURTHER ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES FAILED TO DETECT THE FINANCIAL ADVISOR'S UNDISCLOSED OUTSIDE
BUSINESS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
11/14/2022
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 150,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
AGREEMENT TO REASONABLY SUPERVISE FINANCIAL ADVISORS; PAYMENT OF INVESTIGATIVE COSTS OF $25,000.00.
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES AGREED TO PAY THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, SECURITIES DIVISION A FINE OF
$150,000.00 AND INVESTIGATIVE COSTS OF $25,000.00. SUCH PAYMENT WAS MADE BY CHECK MAILED ON OR ABOUT NOVEMBER 9, 2022.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON NOVEMBER 14, 2022, EDWARD JONES ENTERED INTO A CONSENT ORDER WITH THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL
INSTITUTIONS, SECURITIES DIVISION (THE "DIVISION"). THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, SECURITIES DIVISION
(THE "DIVISION") ALLEGED THAT BETWEEN 2017 AND 2021, EDWARD JONES VIOLATED RCW 21.20.110(1)(J) BY FAILING TO SUPERVISE A FORMER
FINANCIAL ADVISOR, WHO THE DIVISION ALLEGED RECEIVED PAYMENTS OF GIFTS AND LOANS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY $550,000.00 FROM AN
ELDERLY CLIENT WITHOUT DISCLOSING THE PAYMENTS TO EDWARD JONES. THE DIVISION FURTHER ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES FAILED TO DETECT
THE FINANCIAL ADVISOR'S UNDISCLOSED OUTSIDE BUSINESS. UPON BECOMING AWARE OF THE FINANCIAL ADVISOR'S CONDUCT, EDWARD JONES
TERMINATED THE FINANCIAL ADVISOR ON DECEMBER 13, 2021. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE DIVISION'S FINDINGS OF FACT AND
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, EDWARD JONES AGREED TO REASONABLY SUPERVISE ITS REGISTERED SECURITIES SALESPERSONS AND INVESTMENT ADVISER
REPRESENTATIVES, PAY A FINE OF $150,000.00 AND INVESTIGATIVE COSTS OF $25,000.00.
regulatory · block 69PDF pages 360–363
Regulator name — filed text
FINRA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 1,100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON DECEMBER 13, 2022, EDWARD JONES ENTERED INTO AN AWC WITH FINRA WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS. EDWARD JONES AGREED TO A CENSURE, TO CERTIFY THAT IT HAS ESTABLISHED AND IMPLEMENTED POLICIES, PROCEDURES, PROCESSES AND INTERNAL CONTROLS REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ADDRESS AND REMEDIATE THE ISSUES IDENTIFIED IN THE AWC, AND TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $1.1 MILLION. DRP Pages
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

FINRA ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES VIOLATED FINRA RULES 8210(A)(1) AND 2010 BY FAILING TO TIMELY, COMPLETELY, AND ACCURATELY PRODUCE CERTAIN CALL DETAIL RECORDS IN RESPONSE TO CERTAIN FINRA DOCUMENT REQUESTS BETWEEN MAY 2017 AND MARCH 2021. CALL DETAIL RECORDS ARE NOT REQUIRED BROKER-DEALER BOOKS AND RECORDS. FINRA ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES REPRESENTED TO FINRA THAT CALL DETAIL RECORDS OLDER THAN 18 MONTHS WERE NOT AVAILABLE, BUT FAILED TO SEARCH ONE STORAGE LOCATION USED BY CERTAIN EMPLOYEES WITH AN ANALYTICS TOOL AND FAILED TO PROMPTLY NOTIFY FINRA UPON DISCOVERING THE ISSUE. FINRA FURTHER ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES FAILED TO PRESERVE AND PRODUCE TO FINRA CERTAIN CALL DETAIL RECORDS THAT WERE DELETED PURSUANT TO THE COMPANY'S DOCUMENT PURGE PROTOCOL.

Sanction detail — filed text

EDWARD JONES WAS CENSURED, UNDERTOOK TO CERTIFY THAT IT HAS ESTABLISHED AND IMPLEMENTED POLICIES, PROCEDURES, PROCESSES AND INTERNAL CONTROLS REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ADDRESS AND REMEDIATE THE ISSUES IDENTIFIED IN THE AWC, AND PAID A MONETARY FINE OF $1.1 MILLION TO FINRA BY WIRE TRANSFER ON DECEMBER 27, 2022.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.

Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FINRA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
CENSURE, UNDERTAKING
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
12/13/2022
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
2020066649301
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):

6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
FINRA ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES VIOLATED FINRA RULES 8210(A)(1) AND 2010 BY FAILING TO TIMELY, COMPLETELY, AND ACCURATELY PRODUCE
CERTAIN CALL DETAIL RECORDS IN RESPONSE TO CERTAIN FINRA DOCUMENT REQUESTS BETWEEN MAY 2017 AND MARCH 2021. CALL DETAIL
RECORDS ARE NOT REQUIRED BROKER-DEALER BOOKS AND RECORDS. FINRA ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES REPRESENTED TO FINRA THAT CALL
DETAIL RECORDS OLDER THAN 18 MONTHS WERE NOT AVAILABLE, BUT FAILED TO SEARCH ONE STORAGE LOCATION USED BY CERTAIN EMPLOYEES
WITH AN ANALYTICS TOOL AND FAILED TO PROMPTLY NOTIFY FINRA UPON DISCOVERING THE ISSUE. FINRA FURTHER ALLEGED THAT EDWARD JONES
FAILED TO PRESERVE AND PRODUCE TO FINRA CERTAIN CALL DETAIL RECORDS THAT WERE DELETED PURSUANT TO THE COMPANY'S DOCUMENT PURGE
PROTOCOL.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/13/2022
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 1,100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKING
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of
penalty was waived: 
EDWARD JONES WAS CENSURED, UNDERTOOK TO CERTIFY THAT IT HAS ESTABLISHED AND IMPLEMENTED POLICIES, PROCEDURES, PROCESSES
AND INTERNAL CONTROLS REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ADDRESS AND REMEDIATE THE ISSUES IDENTIFIED IN THE AWC, AND PAID A MONETARY
FINE OF $1.1 MILLION TO FINRA BY WIRE TRANSFER ON DECEMBER 27, 2022.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON DECEMBER 13, 2022, EDWARD JONES ENTERED INTO AN AWC WITH FINRA WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS. EDWARD JONES
AGREED TO A CENSURE, TO CERTIFY THAT IT HAS ESTABLISHED AND IMPLEMENTED POLICIES, PROCEDURES, PROCESSES AND INTERNAL CONTROLS
REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ADDRESS AND REMEDIATE THE ISSUES IDENTIFIED IN THE AWC, AND TO PAY A MONETARY FINE OF $1.1 MILLION.

DRP Pages

* Metrics are based on the latest available data, including Form ADV filings, brochures, and relationship summaries pulled from the SEC IAPD, and may be subject to change. Learn what is included in the Rialytix data. Please refer to the firm's official disclosures for the most accurate information using their CRD number. This is not investment advice.