Rialytix Insights
A closer look at the RIA Industry
See where registered investment advisers operate, how industry AUM is distributed, and where assets are moving. Compare states and cities, browse RIAs by AUM tier, identify firms reporting the largest changes in assets, and explore reported private fund assets.
RIAs by AUM
Top RIAs by AUM
Choose an AUM tier to view its top 25 RIAs, ranked by reported AUM.
Explore the Below $100M tier
View up to 25 of the largest RIAs within this AUM range.
Top 3 RIAs in this tier
Loading top RIAs…
- RIAs in this tier
- —
- Total tier AUM
- —
- Share of industry AUM
- —
Tier totals cover all RIAs in this segment. The preview shows up to three RIAs; open the full ranking to view up to 25.
Loading tier totals…
Growth and Decline Signals
Identify RIAs by Signals
Track changes in reported AUM for individual registered investment advisers.
| Rank | RIA | Location | AUM change | 1Y change | Profile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pinebridge Investments LLCCRD 285211 · Base Mar 2025 · Current May 2026 | NEW YORK, NY | +$75.6B | ▲ +64.4% | View RIA |
| 2 | Clearbrook Investment Consulting LLCCRD 108253 · Base Mar 2025 · Current Mar 2026 | NEW YORK, NY | +$13.2B | ▲ +28.2% | View RIA |
| 3 | Situational Awareness LPCRD 333011 · Base Jan 2025 · Current Jun 2026 | SAN FRANCISCO, CA | +$8.9B | ▲ +23.2% | View RIA |
| 4 | 1823 Partners (us) LLCCRD 333927 · Base Sep 2025 · Current Oct 2026 | MIAMI, FL | +$17.5B | ▲ +17.5% | View RIA |
| 5 | Alpinvest Private Equity Investment Management, LLCCRD 322058 · Base Jan 2025 · Current Feb 2026 | NEW YORK, NY | +$4.2B | ▲ +13.3% | View RIA |
Private funds across RIAs
Reported RIA Private Fund Assets
See how reported gross private fund assets are distributed across RIAs. Figures are as of month-end.
RIAs advising private funds counts only eligible RIAs with a known “Yes” response in their latest stored disclosure. The percentage uses the 16,796 RIAs with a known “Yes” or “No” response, out of 17,308 eligible RIAs; missing responses are excluded. Adviser participation is measured separately from the month-end fund asset snapshot.
Source: Rialytix Database. Reported AUM changes are research signals, not investment returns or evidence of financial weakness. Review the underlying RIA profile and filing history.
Generated: Oct 26, 2026.
Current exclusions: These are ranking filters, not platform-wide data exclusions. Firms may still appear elsewhere on Rialytix even if they do not qualify for a specific Insights ranking. Firms without current AUM are excluded from AUM growth, AUM decline, and geography rankings because current size is required for those calculations. Growth and decline rankings require the historical baseline filing to be within 180 days of the selected lookback target date. Older baselines are excluded from Insights rankings so 1Y, 3Y, and 5Y tables remain reasonably comparable. AUM growth rankings require current reported AUM of at least $1 billion and baseline reported AUM of at least $250 million. This reduces small-base percentage distortion and keeps the growth tables focused on firms that reached meaningful current scale. AUM decline rankings require current reported AUM of at least $100 million and baseline reported AUM of at least $250 million. The lower current threshold is intentional because a firm may have declined below larger-firm thresholds after a meaningful contraction. Employee growth rankings require current employee count of at least 50 and baseline employee count of at least 25. This removes firms with very small employee bases. Account growth rankings require available current account data and a historical account baseline. The ranking compares reported advisory accounts, not client quality, revenue, profitability, or account size. City rankings only include cities with more than 5 matching firms to avoid thin-market rankings that may be dominated by one or two firms. Private fund records with missing or conflicting latest gross asset values or fund types are excluded from the private-fund industry total rather than treated as zero. Feeder funds are excluded when identified directly or through reported feeder relationships.