Assets under management Growth by Quarter
Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.
Private Funds
Private funds reported by Hollencrest Capital Management
Employee Growth by Quarter
Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.
Historical AUM and employee figures reflect available SEC Form ADV filings under this CRD. Filing gaps may reflect registration status changes, dormant periods, state registration periods, firm restructuring, or other reporting changes. Rialytix does not interpolate missing periods.
Ownership
Reported direct and indirect ownership ranges
Reported ownership ranges
Highlighted bands show the percentage range reported in Form ADV.
Bars represent the reported range at that individual ownership step, not an estimated percentage of the advisory firm. Indirect relationships may refer to intermediate entities rather than directly to Hollencrest Capital Management.
No indirect ownership information reported in the source’s Schedule B.
Reported ownership and control details
Form ADV · Filing date 2026-06-12 · Schedules A and B
| # | Owner / person & role | Interest in entity | Reported interest | Control person | Title / status acquired | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GREGORY PAUL PELLIZZONMANAGING DIRECTOR, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERIndividual | HOLLENCREST CAPITAL MANAGEMENT | 25% to less than 50%Code C | Yes | MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER01/2000 | Schedule APDF page 33 |
| 2 | ROBERT BURR WOLFORDMANAGING DIRECTOR, DIRECTOR OF MARKETING, PORTFOLIO MANAGERIndividual | HOLLENCREST CAPITAL MANAGEMENT | 25% to less than 50%Code C | Yes | MANAGING DIRECTOR, DIRECTOR OF MARKETING, PORTFOLIO MANAGER01/2000 | Schedule APDF page 33 |
| 3 | JAMES KONONVICE PRESIDENT OF OPERATIONS, AML OFFICER, CISOIndividual | HOLLENCREST CAPITAL MANAGEMENT | Less than 5%Code NA | No | VICE PRESIDENT OF OPERATIONS, AML OFFICER, CISO07/2006 | Schedule APDF page 33 |
| 4 | PETER JOSEPH PELLIZZONMANAGING DIRECTOR, CHIEF OPERATIONS OFFICER, PORTFOLIO MANAGERIndividual | HOLLENCREST CAPITAL MANAGEMENT | 25% to less than 50%Code C | Yes | MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHIEF OPERATIONS OFFICER, PORTFOLIO MANAGER09/1998 | Schedule APDF page 33 |
| 5 | SUSAN MARIE NAKAMURAMANAGING DIRECTOR, CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER, DIRECTOR PORTFOLIO ADMINISTRATIONIndividual | HOLLENCREST CAPITAL MANAGEMENT | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER, DIRECTOR PORTFOLIO ADMINISTRATION06/2026 | Schedule APDF page 33 |
| 6 | CAMERON CURTIS AKERSMANAGING DIRECTOR, CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER, PRESIDENTIndividual | HOLLENCREST CAPITAL MANAGEMENT | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER, PRESIDENT12/2018 | Schedule APDF page 34 |
| 7 | HCM CLASS B MEMBER, LLCVEHICLE FOR EMPLOYEE OWNERSHIP PARTICIPATION OF HCMDomestic entity | HOLLENCREST CAPITAL MANAGEMENT | 5% to less than 10%Code A | No | VEHICLE FOR EMPLOYEE OWNERSHIP PARTICIPATION OF HCM08/2021 | Schedule APDF page 34 |
Less than 5% may include zero. Code F identifies a role without specifying a percentage. Reported interests may overlap and may not include every owner. Total indirect ownership is not calculated.
Compliance & Disclosures
Filing dated 6/12/2026 11:46:27 AM
Responses were selected by the RIA in its filing. Questions are shortened for readability; “you” refers to the reporting firm, and some questions also cover advisory affiliates.
AFelonies2 No
In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:
- A1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a felony?No
- A2Been charged with a felony?No
BMisdemeanors2 No
In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:
- B1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a misdemeanor involving investments, an investment-related business, fraud, false statements or omissions, wrongful taking of property, bribery, perjury, forgery, counterfeiting, or extortion?No
- B2Been charged with a misdemeanor of the kind listed above?No
CSEC or CFTC actions5 No
Has the SEC or CFTC ever:
- C1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
- C2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated SEC or CFTC regulations or statutes?No
- C3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- C4Entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
- C5Imposed a civil money penalty on you or an advisory affiliate, or ordered you or an advisory affiliate to cease and desist from any activity?No
DOther regulatory actions5 No
Has any other federal regulatory agency, state regulatory agency, or foreign financial regulatory authority ever:
- D1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission, or was dishonest, unfair, or unethical?No
- D2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related regulations or statutes?No
- D3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- D4In the past ten years, entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
- D5Denied, suspended, or revoked your or an advisory affiliate’s registration or license, or otherwise prevented association with an investment-related business or restricted activities?No
ESelf-regulatory organization actions3 Yes1 No
Has a self-regulatory organization or commodities exchange ever:
- E1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?Yes
- E2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated its rules, other than a violation designated as a minor rule violation under an SEC-approved plan?Yes
- E3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- E4Disciplined you or an advisory affiliate by expulsion, suspension, barring association with other members, or otherwise restricting activities?Yes
FProfessional authorizations1 No
- FHas an authorization to act as an attorney, accountant, or federal contractor granted to you or an advisory affiliate ever been revoked or suspended?No
GPending regulatory proceedings1 No
- GAre you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a regulatory proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of C, D, or E?No
HCivil judicial actions and proceedings4 No
(1) Court actions
Has a domestic or foreign court:
- H(1)(a)In the past ten years, enjoined you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
- H(1)(b)Found that you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related statutes or regulations?No
- H(1)(c)Dismissed, pursuant to a settlement agreement, an investment-related civil action brought against you or an advisory affiliate by a state or foreign financial regulatory authority?No
(2) Pending civil proceedings
- H(2)Are you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a civil proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of H(1)?No
Additional DRP filings 2 source blocks
Verbatim excerpts from supporting DRP filings, which may concern the firm or advisory affiliates. Amounts retain their filed labels; no total or attribution is inferred.
regulatory · block 1PDF pages 34–36
- Regulator name — filed text
- NATIONAL FUTURES ASSOCIATION
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 125,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Decision & Order of Offer of Settlement
Action status / disposition — filed text
ON OR ABOUT MARCH 16, 2016, HOLLENCREST, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING, AGREED AS TO A FINDING BY THE BUSINESS CONDUCT COMMITTEE OF THE NFA ("COMMITTEE") THAT HOLLENCREST VIOLATED NFA COMPLIANCE RULE 2-4 BY FAILING TO OBSERVE HIGH STANDARDS OF COMMERCIAL HONOR AND JUST AND EQUITABLE PRINCIPLES OF TRADE IN THE CONDUCT OF ITS COMMODITY FUTURES BUSINESS AND SWAPS BUSINESS. HOLLENCREST FURTHER AGREED TO THE ORDER OF THE COMMITTEE TO PAY COMPENSATION OF A $125,000 REIMBURSEMENT FOR THE NFA'S INVESTIGATIVE COSTS AND TO RESOLVE THE NFA'S CHARGES. SEPARATELY, ON MARCH 24, 2016, BASED ON THE CONDUCT OF CHARLTON-GOMES DESCRIBED HEREIN, NITA CHARLTON-GOMES WAS FOUND BY THE FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY ("FINRA") TO HAVE VIOLATED FINRA RULE 2010. CHARLTON-GOMES CONSENTED TO A LIFETIME BAR FROM ASSOCIATION WITH ANY FINRA MEMBER BROKER-DEALER IN ALL CAPACITIES. IN DECEMBER 2015, CHARLTON-GOMES WAS TERMINATED FROM EMPLOYMENT AT HOLLENCREST. PELLIZZON WAS NOT FOUND TO HAVE VIOLATED ANY NFA OR FINRA RULES AND NO PENALTIES WERE ASSESSED AGAINST HIM.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
ON DECEMBER 21, 2015, THE NATIONAL FUTURES ASSOCIATION ("NFA") ISSUED A COMPLAINT AGAINST HOLLENCREST AND PETER PELLIZZON ("PELLIZZON"). THE COMPLAINT ALLEGED THAT HOLLENCREST VIOLATED NFA COMPLIANCE RULE 2-2(F) BASED ON COMMUNICATIONS BY A FORMER HOLLENCREST EMPLOYEE, NITA CHARLTON-GOMES ("CHARLTON-GOMES"). CHARLTON-GOMES SENT NFA'S REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT A COPY OF A FABRICATED E-MAIL SHE CLAIMED SHE RECEIVED FROM A NFA EMPLOYEE WHO DID NOT IN FACT EXIST. THIS FABRICATED E-MAIL SHOWED THE NFA'S APPROVAL OF ANOTHER HOLLENCREST EMPLOYEE'S REGISTRATION. CHARLTON-GOMES INITIALLY HID THIS FRABRICATED E-MAIL FROM PELLIZZON AND HOLLENCREST AND THEN REPEATEDLY LIED TO PELLIZZON REGARDING THE FABRICATED E-MAIL WHEN THE NFA QUESTIONED ITS VALIDITY. PELLIZZON AND HOLLENCREST ONLY LEARNED OF THE VIOLATION WHEN THE NFA UNCOVERED THE FABRICATED E-MAIL. CHARLTON-GOMES' DECEPTION CAUSED THE NFA AND HOLLENCREST TO INCUR SIGNIFICANT COSTS TO INVESTIGATE AND RESOLVE THE MATTER. THE COMPLAINT ALLEGED THAT HOLLENCREST AND PELLIZZON DID NOT ADEQUATELY SUPERVISE THE FIRM'S INVESTIGATION OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES SURROUNDING CHARLTON-GOMES' SUBMISSION OF INFORMATION TO THE NFA, IN VIOLATION OF NFA COMPLIANCE RULE 2-G (A).
Sanction detail — filed text
PAID $125,000 FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF NFA INVESTIGATIVE EXPENSES.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page.
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name).
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances:
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
Yes
No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1. Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC
Other Federal
State
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO)
NATIONAL FUTURES ASSOCIATION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions:
PAID $125,000 FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF NFA INVESTIGATIVE EXPENSES.
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/21/2015
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
15BCC033
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types:
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
ON DECEMBER 21, 2015, THE NATIONAL FUTURES ASSOCIATION ("NFA") ISSUED A COMPLAINT AGAINST HOLLENCREST AND PETER PELLIZZON
("PELLIZZON"). THE COMPLAINT ALLEGED THAT HOLLENCREST VIOLATED NFA COMPLIANCE RULE 2-2(F) BASED ON COMMUNICATIONS BY A FORMER
HOLLENCREST EMPLOYEE, NITA CHARLTON-GOMES ("CHARLTON-GOMES"). CHARLTON-GOMES SENT NFA'S REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT A COPY OF A
FABRICATED E-MAIL SHE CLAIMED SHE RECEIVED FROM A NFA EMPLOYEE WHO DID NOT IN FACT EXIST. THIS FABRICATED E-MAIL SHOWED THE NFA'S
APPROVAL OF ANOTHER HOLLENCREST EMPLOYEE'S REGISTRATION. CHARLTON-GOMES INITIALLY HID THIS FRABRICATED E-MAIL FROM PELLIZZON
AND HOLLENCREST AND THEN REPEATEDLY LIED TO PELLIZZON REGARDING THE FABRICATED E-MAIL WHEN THE NFA QUESTIONED ITS VALIDITY.
PELLIZZON AND HOLLENCREST ONLY LEARNED OF THE VIOLATION WHEN THE NFA UNCOVERED THE FABRICATED E-MAIL. CHARLTON-GOMES'
DECEPTION CAUSED THE NFA AND HOLLENCREST TO INCUR SIGNIFICANT COSTS TO INVESTIGATE AND RESOLVE THE MATTER. THE COMPLAINT
ALLEGED THAT HOLLENCREST AND PELLIZZON DID NOT ADEQUATELY SUPERVISE THE FIRM'S INVESTIGATION OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES SURROUNDING
CHARLTON-GOMES' SUBMISSION OF INFORMATION TO THE NFA, IN VIOLATION OF NFA COMPLIANCE RULE 2-G (A).
8.
Current Status?
Pending
On Appeal
Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Decision & Order of Offer of Settlement
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
03/16/2016
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 125,000.00
Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
Disgorgement/Restitution
Censure
Cease and Desist/Injunction
Bar
Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived:
PAID $125,000 FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF NFA INVESTIGATIVE EXPENSES.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON OR ABOUT MARCH 16, 2016, HOLLENCREST, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING, AGREED AS TO A FINDING BY THE BUSINESS CONDUCT COMMITTEE
OF THE NFA ("COMMITTEE") THAT HOLLENCREST VIOLATED NFA COMPLIANCE RULE 2-4 BY FAILING TO OBSERVE HIGH STANDARDS OF COMMERCIAL
HONOR AND JUST AND EQUITABLE PRINCIPLES OF TRADE IN THE CONDUCT OF ITS COMMODITY FUTURES BUSINESS AND SWAPS BUSINESS.
HOLLENCREST FURTHER AGREED TO THE ORDER OF THE COMMITTEE TO PAY COMPENSATION OF A $125,000 REIMBURSEMENT FOR THE NFA'S
INVESTIGATIVE COSTS AND TO RESOLVE THE NFA'S CHARGES. SEPARATELY, ON MARCH 24, 2016, BASED ON THE CONDUCT OF CHARLTON-GOMES
DESCRIBED HEREIN, NITA CHARLTON-GOMES WAS FOUND BY THE FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY ("FINRA") TO HAVE VIOLATED FINRA
RULE 2010. CHARLTON-GOMES CONSENTED TO A LIFETIME BAR FROM ASSOCIATION WITH ANY FINRA MEMBER BROKER-DEALER IN ALL CAPACITIES. IN
DECEMBER 2015, CHARLTON-GOMES WAS TERMINATED FROM EMPLOYMENT AT HOLLENCREST. PELLIZZON WAS NOT FOUND TO HAVE VIOLATED ANY
NFA OR FINRA RULES AND NO PENALTIES WERE ASSESSED AGAINST HIM.regulatory · block 2PELLIZZON, GREGORY, PAULPDF pages 36–38
- Advisory affiliate name — filed text
- PELLIZZON, GREGORY, PAUL
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE CRD Number: 712667 This advisory affiliate is a Firm an Individual Registered: Yes No Name: PELLIZZON, GREGORY, PAUL (For individuals, Last, First, Middle) This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 2. Principal Sanction: Other Sanctions: 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: Other Product Types: 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided).
* Metrics are based on the latest available data, including Form ADV filings, brochures, and relationship summaries pulled from the SEC IAPD, and may be subject to change. Learn what is included in the Rialytix data. Please refer to the firm's official disclosures for the most accurate information using their CRD number. This is not investment advice.