Canterbury Consulting Incorporated

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
275918
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
KRUEGER, KENNETH, PETER
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item

11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC)
2.
Principal Sanction:
Undertaking
Other Sanctions: 
ORDER INSTITUTING ADMINISTRATIVE AND CEASE-AND-DESIST PROCEEDINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
10/26/2017
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
FILE NO. 3-18269
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
CANTERBURY CONSULTING
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
CANTERBURY WAS NAMED IN AN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BY THE SEC ALLEGING THAT FROM JANUARY 2013 THROUGH NOVEMBER 2014,
CANTERBURY DID NOT PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SUPERVISION OF A FORMER MINORITY OWNER INVOLVING PREFERENTIAL TRADE ALLOCATIONS AND DID
NOT ADOPT AND IMPLEMENT SPECIFIC WRITTEN POLICIES AND PROCEDURES DESIGNED TO PREVENT SUCH TRADING ACTIVITY. ADDITIONALLY,
CANTERBURY DID NOT MAINTAIN ANY RECORD OF THE CLIENTS OR PROSPECTIVE CLIENTS TO WHOM IT OFFERED OR DELIVERED ITS FORM ADV PART 2
AS FILED WITH THE SEC ON MARCH 28, 2013.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Decision & Order of Offer of Settlement
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
10/26/2017
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension

B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
IN ADDITION, CANTERBURY SHALL PAY DISGORGEMENT OF $66,071 AND PREJUDGMENT INTEREST OF $6,915 AS WELL AS $207,102, ON A
VOLUNTARY BASIS, TO AFFECTED CLIENTS TO REMEDIATE THE HARM BY THE FORMER EMPLOYEE ("REMEDIATION")
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
CANTERBURY WAS NAMED IN AN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BY THE SEC ALLEGING THAT FROM JANUARY 2013 THROUGH NOVEMBER 2014,
CANTERBURY DID NOT PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SUPERVISION OF A FORMER MINORITY OWNER INVOLVING PREFERENTIAL TRADE ALLOCATIONS AND
DID NOT ADOPT AND IMPLEMENT SPECIFIC WRITTEN POLICIES AND PROCEDURES DESIGNED TO PREVENT SUCH TRADING ACTIVITY.
ADDITIONALLY, CANTERBURY DID NOT MAINTAIN ANY RECORD OF THE CLIENTS OR PROSPECTIVE CLIENTS TO WHOM IT OFFERED OR DELIVERED
ITS FORM ADV PART 2 AS FILED WITH THE SEC ON MARCH 28, 2013. THE PRACTICE OF BLOCK TRADING IN ALLOCATION ACCOUNTS, WHICH WAS
USED SOLELY BY A FORMER MEMBER AND AFFECTED ONLY A LIMITED NUMBER ADVISORY CLIENTS ASSIGNED TO THAT MEMBER, WAS NOT PART
OF CANTERBURY'S CORE CONSULTING SERVICES AND ULTIMATELY DISCONTINUED. AS PART OF THE UNDERTAKING AND RESOLUTION OF THIS
MATTER, CANTERBURY SIGNED AN OFFER OF SETTLEMENT AND AGREED TO PROVIDE A NOTICE TO ALL AFFECTED ADVISORY CLIENTS REGARDING
THE ORDER, PAY A CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, DISGORGEMENT OF $66,071, PREJUDGMENT INTEREST OF $6,915
AND PROVIDE CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE IN THE ABOVE MATTER. IN ADDITION, CANTERBURY PAID $207,102, ON A VOLUNTARY BASIS, TO
AFFECTED CLIENTS TO REMEDIATE THE HARM BY THE FORMER EMPLOYEE.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
CANTERBURY WAS NAMED IN AN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING BY THE SEC ALLEGING THAT FROM JANUARY 2013 THROUGH NOVEMBER 2014,
CANTERBURY DID NOT PROVIDE SUFFICIENT SUPERVISION OF A FORMER MINORITY OWNER INVOLVING PREFERENTIAL TRADE ALLOCATIONS AND DID
NOT ADOPT AND IMPLEMENT SPECIFIC WRITTEN POLICIES AND PROCEDURES DESIGNED TO PREVENT SUCH TRADING ACTIVITY. ADDITIONALLY,
CANTERBURY DID NOT MAINTAIN ANY RECORD OF THE CLIENTS OR PROSPECTIVE CLIENTS TO WHOM IT OFFERED OR DELIVERED ITS FORM ADV PART 2
AS FILED WITH THE SEC ON MARCH 28, 2013. THE PRACTICE OF BLOCK TRADING IN ALLOCATION ACCOUNTS, WHICH WAS USED SOLELY BY A FORMER
MEMBER AND AFFECTED ONLY A LIMITED NUMBER ADVISORY CLIENTS ASSIGNED TO THAT MEMBER, WAS NOT PART OF CANTERBURY'S CORE
CONSULTING SERVICES AND ULTIMATELY DISCONTINUED. AS PART OF THE UNDERTAKING AND RESOLUTION OF THIS MATTER, CANTERBURY SIGNED AN
OFFER OF SETTLEMENT AND AGREED TO PROVIDE A NOTICE TO ALL AFFECTED ADVISORY CLIENTS REGARDING THE ORDER, PAY A CIVIL MONETARY
PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000, DISGORGEMENT OF $66,071, PREJUDGMENT INTEREST OF $6,915 AND PROVIDE CERTIFICATION OF
COMPLIANCE IN THE ABOVE MATTER. IN ADDITION, CANTERBURY PAID $207,102, ON A VOLUNTARY BASIS, TO AFFECTED CLIENTS TO REMEDIATE THE
HARM BY THE FORMER EMPLOYEE.