Firm profile

Pacific Investment Management Company LLC

NEWPORT BEACH, CACRD 104559Registration Status: ApprovedEffective since November 14, 1994SEC # 801-48187Latest ADV August 28, 2026

Pacific Investment Management Company LLC is an SEC registered investment adviser organized as a limited liability company with a primary office location in Newport Beach, CA. Its latest Form ADV filing, dated August 28, 2026, reports $3.7T in regulatory assets under management, 1,968 employees, 7 offices, and 2,835 accounts.

Assets Under Management
$3.7T
Employees
1,968
Offices
7 offices
Total Clients
41,699

Associated firm names

3 names listed
  • PACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CO LLC
  • PIMCO
  • PACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC

Leadership

10 roles identified
CEOEmmanuel N. Roman
CCONadia Zakir
CFOJohn J. Kirkowski

Advisory services offered

7 types reported
Other advisory services
Pension consulting services
Portfolio management for businesses

Fee models offered

2 types reported
Asset based fees
Performance-based fees

Offices & Contact

Primary office

NEWPORT BEACH, California, United States

Loading map…

Primary office regionOther reported regions

Shading shows states and countries with reported offices. Cities are listed below; shading does not indicate service coverage.

California

NEWPORT BEACHPrimary office · LOS ANGELES · SAN DIEGO

Florida

MIAMI

Illinois

CHICAGO

New York

NEW YORK

Texas

AUSTIN

7 office records listed · 7 total offices reported. Counts can use different reporting dates. SEC filers may list only their largest 25 additional offices.

Contact and digital presence

ADV profile links

Regulatory Assets Under Management Breakdown

Total regulatory assets under management$3.7Tas of August 28, 2026
Discretionary100.0%
$3.7T
100% of total RAUM100.0%
Non-discretionary0.0%
$457M
0% of total RAUM0.0%
All regulatory assets under management are discretionary.

Client Coverage Demographics

Top client segmentIrrevocable Trusts/Estates represent 79.3% of total clients.
Top client categories% of clientsClients
1
Irrevocable Trusts/Estates
79.3%
33,080
2
Individuals
14.0%
5,833
3
Pooled Investment Vehicles
2.0%
818
4
Insurance Cos.
1.4%
601
5
Pension Plans
1.0%
436
Additional categories (<0.1%)
HNWI17 clients
Other Advisers5 clients

Assets under management Growth by Quarter

Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.

Total AUM$3.7T
Total Accounts2,835
10Y AUM Change+$2.2T (+150.0%)

Private Funds

Private funds reported by Pacific Investment Management Company LLC

Loading private fund disclosures…

Employee Growth by Quarter

Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.

Total Employees1,968
Clients per Employee21:1
10Y Employee Change-203 (-9.4%)

Historical AUM and employee figures reflect available SEC Form ADV filings under this CRD. Filing gaps may reflect registration status changes, dormant periods, state registration periods, firm restructuring, or other reporting changes. Rialytix does not interpolate missing periods.


Ownership

Reported direct and indirect ownership ranges

Each range applies to a separate reported relationship and should not be added together.

Reported ownership ranges

Highlighted bands show the percentage range reported in Form ADV.

0%25%50%75%100%
ALLIANZ ASSET MANAGEMENT OF AMERICA LLCDirect owner · Schedule AInterest in PACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC
75%+
ALLIANZ OF AMERICA, INC.Indirect owner · Schedule BInterest in ALLIANZ ASSET MANAGEMENT OF AMERICA LLC
75%+
ALLIANZ EUROPE B.V.Indirect owner · Schedule BInterest in ALLIANZ OF AMERICA, INC.
75%+
ALLIANZ SEIndirect owner · Schedule BInterest in ALLIANZ EUROPE B.V.
75%+

Bars represent the reported range at that individual ownership step, not an estimated percentage of the advisory firm. Indirect relationships may refer to intermediate entities rather than directly to Pacific Investment Management Company LLC.

Reported ownership and control details

Form ADV · Filing date 2026-08-28 · Schedules A and B

24 entries
#Owner / person & roleInterest in entityReported interestControl personTitle / status acquiredSource
1DANIEL JOHN IVASCYNMANAGING DIRECTOR - EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND GROUP CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICERIndividualPACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLCLess than 5%Code NAYesMANAGING DIRECTOR - EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND GROUP CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER09/2014Schedule APDF page 1025
2ANDREW THOMAS BALLSMANAGING DIRECTOR - CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER (GLOBAL)IndividualPACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLCLess than 5%Code NAYesMANAGING DIRECTOR - CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER (GLOBAL)09/2014Schedule APDF page 1025
3ALLIANZ ASSET MANAGEMENT OF AMERICA LLCMEMBERDomestic entityPACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC75% or moreCode EYesMEMBER12/2006Schedule APDF page 1025
4KIMBERLEY GRACE KORINKEMANAGING DIRECTOR - EXECUTIVE COMMITTEEIndividualPACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLCLess than 5%Code NAYesMANAGING DIRECTOR - EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE02/2016Schedule APDF page 1025
5EMMANUEL NMN ROMANMANAGING DIRECTOR - EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERIndividualPACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLCLess than 5%Code NAYesMANAGING DIRECTOR - EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER11/2016Schedule APDF page 1025
6THIBAULT CHRISTIAN STRACKEMANAGING DIRECTOR - PRESIDENT AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEEIndividualPACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLCLess than 5%Code NAYesMANAGING DIRECTOR - PRESIDENT AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE02/2017Schedule APDF page 1025
7JOHN JEFFREY KIRKOWSKIMANAGING DIRECTOR - CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERIndividualPACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLCLess than 5%Code NAYesMANAGING DIRECTOR - CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER09/2017Schedule APDF page 1025
8PETER G. STRELOWMANAGING DIRECTOR - CO-CHIEF OPERATING OFFICERIndividualPACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLCLess than 5%Code NAYesMANAGING DIRECTOR - CO-CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER09/2017Schedule APDF page 1025
9Robin Christine ShanahanMANAGING DIRECTOR - CO-CHIEF OPERATING OFFICERIndividualPACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLCLess than 5%Code NAYesMANAGING DIRECTOR - CO-CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER09/2017Schedule APDF page 1025
10CANDICE STACK WHITTENMANAGING DIRECTOR - EXECUTIVE COMMITTEEIndividualPACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLCLess than 5%Code NAYesMANAGING DIRECTOR - EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE03/2020Schedule APDF page 1025
11GREGORY WESTON HALLMANAGING DIRECTOR - EXECUTIVE COMMITTEEIndividualPACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLCLess than 5%Code NAYesMANAGING DIRECTOR - EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE09/2020Schedule APDF page 1025
12Nadia ZakirMANAGING DIRECTOR - GLOBAL HEAD OF COMPLIANCE AND CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICERIndividualPACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLCLess than 5%Code NAYesMANAGING DIRECTOR - GLOBAL HEAD OF COMPLIANCE AND CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER06/2021Schedule APDF page 1025
13QI WANGMANAGING DIRECTOR - CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER (PORTFOLIO IMPLEMENTATION)IndividualPACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLCLess than 5%Code NAYesMANAGING DIRECTOR - CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER (PORTFOLIO IMPLEMENTATION)06/2022Schedule APDF page 1025
14Jason Robert SteinerMANAGING DIRECTOR - EXECUTIVE COMMITTEEIndividualPACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLCLess than 5%Code NAYesMANAGING DIRECTOR - EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE01/2023Schedule APDF page 1025
15Mangala AnanthanarayananMANAGING DIRECTOR - EXECUTIVE COMMITTEEIndividualPACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLCLess than 5%Code NAYesMANAGING DIRECTOR - EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE01/2023Schedule APDF page 1025
16MARC PETER SEIDNERMANAGING DIRECTOR - CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER (NON-TRADITIONAL STRATEGIES)IndividualPACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLCLess than 5%Code NAYesMANAGING DIRECTOR - CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER (NON-TRADITIONAL STRATEGIES)11/2014Schedule APDF page 1025
17MOHIT MITTALMANAGING DIRECTOR - CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER (CORE STRATEGIES) AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEEIndividualPACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLCLess than 5%Code NAYesMANAGING DIRECTOR - CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER (CORE STRATEGIES) AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE12/2023Schedule APDF page 1025
18ALFRED TAKETO MURATAMANAGING DIRECTOR - EXECUTIVE COMMITTEEIndividualPACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLCLess than 5%Code NAYesMANAGING DIRECTOR - EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE02/2024Schedule APDF page 1025
19SUNG-HEE SUHMANAGING DIRECTOR - GLOBAL GENERAL COUNSELIndividualPACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLCLess than 5%Code NAYesMANAGING DIRECTOR - GLOBAL GENERAL COUNSEL12/2023Schedule APDF page 1026
20STEPHEN KOON BONG CHANGMANAGING DIRECTOR - EXECUTIVE COMMITTEEIndividualPACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLCLess than 5%Code NAYesMANAGING DIRECTOR - EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE01/2026Schedule APDF page 1026
21JASON WILLIAM MANDINACHMANAGING DIRECTOR - EXECUTIVE COMMITTEEIndividualPACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLCLess than 5%Code NAYesMANAGING DIRECTOR - EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE01/2026Schedule APDF page 1026
22ALLIANZ OF AMERICA, INC.MEMBER - CLASS A UNITS, CLASS E UNITS, CLASS C UNITSDomestic entityALLIANZ ASSET MANAGEMENT OF AMERICA LLC75% or moreCode ENoMEMBER - CLASS A UNITS, CLASS E UNITS, CLASS C UNITS05/2000Schedule BPDF page 1026
23ALLIANZ EUROPE B.V.SHAREHOLDER - COMMON STOCK, COMMON STOCK CLASS BForeign entityALLIANZ OF AMERICA, INC.75% or moreCode ENoSHAREHOLDER - COMMON STOCK, COMMON STOCK CLASS B06/2012Schedule BPDF page 1026
24ALLIANZ SESHAREHOLDERForeign entityALLIANZ EUROPE B.V.75% or moreCode EYesSHAREHOLDER06/2012Schedule BPDF page 1026

Less than 5% may include zero. Code F identifies a role without specifying a percentage. Reported interests may overlap and may not include every owner. Total indirect ownership is not calculated.

Compliance & Disclosures

Filing dated 8/28/2026 4:03:08 PM

Responses were selected by the RIA in its filing. Questions are shortened for readability; “you” refers to the reporting firm, and some questions also cover advisory affiliates.

RIA or supervised-person involvementThe RIA reported that one or more events below involve the firm or its supervised persons.RIA responseYes
AFelonies2 No

In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:

  • A1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a felony?No
  • A2Been charged with a felony?No
BMisdemeanors2 No

In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:

  • B1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a misdemeanor involving investments, an investment-related business, fraud, false statements or omissions, wrongful taking of property, bribery, perjury, forgery, counterfeiting, or extortion?No
  • B2Been charged with a misdemeanor of the kind listed above?No
CSEC or CFTC actions4 Yes1 No

Has the SEC or CFTC ever:

  • C1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?Yes
  • C2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated SEC or CFTC regulations or statutes?Yes
  • C3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
  • C4Entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?Yes
  • C5Imposed a civil money penalty on you or an advisory affiliate, or ordered you or an advisory affiliate to cease and desist from any activity?Yes
DOther regulatory actions5 No

Has any other federal regulatory agency, state regulatory agency, or foreign financial regulatory authority ever:

  • D1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission, or was dishonest, unfair, or unethical?No
  • D2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related regulations or statutes?No
  • D3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
  • D4In the past ten years, entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
  • D5Denied, suspended, or revoked your or an advisory affiliate’s registration or license, or otherwise prevented association with an investment-related business or restricted activities?No
ESelf-regulatory organization actions2 Yes2 No

Has a self-regulatory organization or commodities exchange ever:

  • E1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
  • E2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated its rules, other than a violation designated as a minor rule violation under an SEC-approved plan?Yes
  • E3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
  • E4Disciplined you or an advisory affiliate by expulsion, suspension, barring association with other members, or otherwise restricting activities?Yes
FProfessional authorizations1 No
  • FHas an authorization to act as an attorney, accountant, or federal contractor granted to you or an advisory affiliate ever been revoked or suspended?No
GPending regulatory proceedings1 No
  • GAre you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a regulatory proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of C, D, or E?No
HCivil judicial actions and proceedings4 No

(1) Court actions

Has a domestic or foreign court:

  • H(1)(a)In the past ten years, enjoined you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
  • H(1)(b)Found that you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related statutes or regulations?No
  • H(1)(c)Dismissed, pursuant to a settlement agreement, an investment-related civil action brought against you or an advisory affiliate by a state or foreign financial regulatory authority?No

(2) Pending civil proceedings

  • H(2)Are you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a civil proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of H(1)?No
Additional DRP filings 6 source blocks

Verbatim excerpts from supporting DRP filings, which may concern the firm or advisory affiliates. Amounts retain their filed labels; no total or attribution is inferred.

regulatory · block 1PDF pages 1027–1029
Regulator name — filed text
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 18,300,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Settled

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON DECEMBER 1, 2016, THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ("SEC") ANNOUNCED AN AGREEMENT WITH PIMCO TO SETTLE THE CHARGES RELATING TO BOND. THE SEC ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER IS FINAL. THE CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY, DISGORGEMENT AND PREJUDMENT INTEREST WILL BE PAID WITHIN 14 DAYS OF THE ENTRY OF THE ORDER. PIMCO WILL RETAIN AN INDEPENDENT COMPLIANCE CONSULTANT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE ISSUANCE OF THE ORDER, THE CONSULTANT WILL SUBMIT A REPORT TO PIMCO AND THE SEC STAFF WITHIN 120 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE ORDER, AND PIMCO WILL ADOPT THE RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED IN THE REPORT WITHIN 90 DAYS OF RECEIPT.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

ON DECEMBER 1, 2016, PIMCO ENTERED INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ("SEC") TO SETTLE CHARGES RELATING TO THE PIMCO TOTAL RETURN ACTIVE EXCHANGE-TRADED FUND ("BOND"). THE SEC ALLEGED THAT FROM FEBRUARY 29, 2012 TO JUNE 30, 2012, PIMCO DID NOT SUFFICIENTLY DISCLOSE THE SOURCES OF PERFORMANCE FOR BOND, INACCURATELY VALUED 43 SMALLER-SIZED ("ODD LOT") POSITIONS OF NON-AGENCY MORTGAGE BACKED SECURITIES USING THIRD-PARTY VENDOR PRICES, AND DID NOT ADOPT AND IMPLEMENT ADEQUATE WRITTEN POLICIES AND PROCEDURES RELATED TO THESE MATTERS. THE SEC FOUND, AND PIMCO NEITHER ADMITTED NOR DENIED, THAT PIMCO VIOLATED SECTION 206(2) OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940 ("ADVISERS ACT"), SECTION 206(4) OF THE ADVISERS ACT AND RULES 206(4)-7 AND 206(4)-8 THEREUNDER, SECTION 34(B) OF THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT, AND RULE 22C-1 UNDER THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT.

Sanction detail — filed text

PURSUANT TO THE SETTLEMENT, THE SEC ORDERED A CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $18.3 MILLION, $1.33 MILLION OF DISGORGEMENT, AND $198,179.04 OF PREJUDGMENT INTEREST. THE PENALTY, DISGORGEMENT, AND PREJUDGMENT INTEREST WILL BE PAID WITHIN 14 DAYS OF THE ENTRY OF THE ORDER. NO PORTION OF THE PENALTY WAS WAIVED. THE SETTLEMENT ALSO REQUIRED PIMCO TO RETAIN AN INDEPENDENT COMPLIANCE CONSULTANT TO REVIEW ITS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR VALUING ODD LOTS AS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.

PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
CEASE AND DESIST, CENSURE, UNDERTAKING, DISGORGEMENT AND PREJUDGMENT INTEREST
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
12/01/2016
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING FILE NO. 3-17701
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other
Other Product Types: 
EXCHANGE TRADED FUND
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
ON DECEMBER 1, 2016, PIMCO ENTERED INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ("SEC") TO SETTLE CHARGES
RELATING TO THE PIMCO TOTAL RETURN ACTIVE EXCHANGE-TRADED FUND ("BOND"). THE SEC ALLEGED THAT FROM FEBRUARY 29, 2012 TO JUNE 30,
2012, PIMCO DID NOT SUFFICIENTLY DISCLOSE THE SOURCES OF PERFORMANCE FOR BOND, INACCURATELY VALUED 43 SMALLER-SIZED ("ODD LOT")
POSITIONS OF NON-AGENCY MORTGAGE BACKED SECURITIES USING THIRD-PARTY VENDOR PRICES, AND DID NOT ADOPT AND IMPLEMENT ADEQUATE
WRITTEN POLICIES AND PROCEDURES RELATED TO THESE MATTERS. THE SEC FOUND, AND PIMCO NEITHER ADMITTED NOR DENIED, THAT PIMCO
VIOLATED SECTION 206(2) OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940 ("ADVISERS ACT"), SECTION 206(4) OF THE ADVISERS ACT AND RULES
206(4)-7 AND 206(4)-8 THEREUNDER, SECTION 34(B) OF THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT, AND RULE 22C-1 UNDER THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Settled
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/01/2016
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 18,300,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKING
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
PURSUANT TO THE SETTLEMENT, THE SEC ORDERED A CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $18.3 MILLION, $1.33 MILLION OF
DISGORGEMENT, AND $198,179.04 OF PREJUDGMENT INTEREST. THE PENALTY, DISGORGEMENT, AND PREJUDGMENT INTEREST WILL BE PAID
WITHIN 14 DAYS OF THE ENTRY OF THE ORDER. NO PORTION OF THE PENALTY WAS WAIVED. THE SETTLEMENT ALSO REQUIRED PIMCO TO

RETAIN AN INDEPENDENT COMPLIANCE CONSULTANT TO REVIEW ITS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR VALUING ODD LOTS AS DESCRIBED IN
THE ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON DECEMBER 1, 2016, THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ("SEC") ANNOUNCED AN AGREEMENT WITH PIMCO TO SETTLE THE CHARGES
RELATING TO BOND. THE SEC ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER IS FINAL. THE CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY, DISGORGEMENT AND PREJUDMENT INTEREST WILL BE
PAID WITHIN 14 DAYS OF THE ENTRY OF THE ORDER. PIMCO WILL RETAIN AN INDEPENDENT COMPLIANCE CONSULTANT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE
ISSUANCE OF THE ORDER, THE CONSULTANT WILL SUBMIT A REPORT TO PIMCO AND THE SEC STAFF WITHIN 120 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE ORDER,
AND PIMCO WILL ADOPT THE RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED IN THE REPORT WITHIN 90 DAYS OF RECEIPT.
regulatory · block 2YAN, JUNYINGPDF pages 1029–1030
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
YAN, JUNYING
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
6224552
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
YAN, JUNYING
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.

PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 3PDF pages 1030–1032
Regulator name — filed text
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 2,500,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Settled

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON JUNE 16, 2023, THE SEC ANNOUNCED AN AGREEMENT WITH PIMCO TO SETTLE THE CHARGES RELATING TO A4. THE SEC ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER IS FINAL. THE CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY WILL BE PAID WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE ENTRY OF THE ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

ON JUNE 16, 2023, PIMCO ENTERED INTO A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE SEC RELATING TO AN ERROR IN THE FEE WAIVER CALCULATION USED BY PIMCO'S THIRD-PARTY VENDOR THAT CAUSED CERTAIN ADVISORY FEES TO BE UNDER-WAIVED FROM APRIL 2011 TO NOVEMBER 2017 AND CHARGED TO PIMCO ALL ASSET ALL AUTHORITY FUND ("A4"). UNDER THE TERMS OF THE SETTLEMENT, PIMCO AGREED TO PAY TO THE SEC A CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $2.5 MILLION. PRIOR TO THE SEC'S INVESTIGATION, PIMCO HAD IDENTIFIED THE ERROR, PUBLICLY DISCLOSED THE ISSUE AND IMPLEMENTED A PLAN THAT REIMBURSED A4 AND ITS SHAREHOLDERS FOR ANY LOSSES ASSOCIATED WITH THE FEE WAIVER MISCALCULATION. IN ADDITION, PIMCO HAS ENHANCED ITS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES RELATING TO ITS OVERSIGHT OF THE THIRD-PARTY VENDOR'S ADVISORY FEE CALCULATIONS.

Sanction detail — filed text

PURSUANT TO THE SETTLEMENT, THE SEC ORDERED A CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $2.5 MILLION. THE PENALTY WILL BE PAID WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE ENTRY OF THE ORDER. NO PORTION OF THE PENALTY WAS WAIVED.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)

( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
CEASE AND DESIST, CENSURE
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
06/16/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING FILE NO. 3-21489
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 

7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
ON JUNE 16, 2023, PIMCO ENTERED INTO A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE SEC RELATING TO AN ERROR IN THE FEE WAIVER CALCULATION USED
BY PIMCO'S THIRD-PARTY VENDOR THAT CAUSED CERTAIN ADVISORY FEES TO BE UNDER-WAIVED FROM APRIL 2011 TO NOVEMBER 2017 AND CHARGED
TO PIMCO ALL ASSET ALL AUTHORITY FUND ("A4"). UNDER THE TERMS OF THE SETTLEMENT, PIMCO AGREED TO PAY TO THE SEC A CIVIL MONETARY
PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $2.5 MILLION. PRIOR TO THE SEC'S INVESTIGATION, PIMCO HAD IDENTIFIED THE ERROR, PUBLICLY DISCLOSED THE
ISSUE AND IMPLEMENTED A PLAN THAT REIMBURSED A4 AND ITS SHAREHOLDERS FOR ANY LOSSES ASSOCIATED WITH THE FEE WAIVER
MISCALCULATION. IN ADDITION, PIMCO HAS ENHANCED ITS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES RELATING TO ITS OVERSIGHT OF THE THIRD-PARTY VENDOR'S
ADVISORY FEE CALCULATIONS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Settled
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
06/16/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 2,500,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
PURSUANT TO THE SETTLEMENT, THE SEC ORDERED A CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $2.5 MILLION. THE PENALTY WILL BE PAID
WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE ENTRY OF THE ORDER. NO PORTION OF THE PENALTY WAS WAIVED.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON JUNE 16, 2023, THE SEC ANNOUNCED AN AGREEMENT WITH PIMCO TO SETTLE THE CHARGES RELATING TO A4. THE SEC ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER IS
FINAL. THE CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY WILL BE PAID WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE ENTRY OF THE ORDER.
regulatory · block 4PDF pages 1032–1034
Regulator name — filed text
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 6,500,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Settled

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON JUNE 16, 2023, THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ("SEC") ANNOUNCED AN AGREEMENT WITH PIMCO TO SETTLE THE CHARGES RELATING TO PGP. THE SEC ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER IS FINAL. THE CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY WILL BE PAID WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE ENTRY OF THE ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

ON JUNE 16, 2023, PIMCO ENTERED INTO A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE SEC RELATING TO CERTAIN DISCLOSURES IN THE 2014 AND 2015 ANNUAL SHAREHOLDER REPORTS OF PIMCO GLOBAL STOCKSPLUS & INCOME FUND ("PGP") REGARDING PGP'S USE OF PAIRED INTEREST RATE SWAPS IN ITS PORTFOLIO. UNDER THE TERMS OF THE SETTLEMENT, PIMCO AGREED TO PAY TO THE SEC A CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $6.5 MILLION. PRIOR TO THE SEC'S INVESTIGATION, PIMCO HAD UPDATED THE DISCLOSURES IN PGP'S 2016 ANNUAL SHAREHOLDER REPORT.

Sanction detail — filed text

PURSUANT TO THE SETTLEMENT, THE SEC ORDERED A CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $6.5 MILLION. THE PENALTY WILL BE PAID WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE ENTRY OF THE ORDER. NO PORTION OF THE PENALTY WAS WAIVED.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):

You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
CEASE AND DESIST, CENSURE
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
06/16/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING FILE NO. 3-21490
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other
Other Product Types: 
CLOSED-END FUND
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
ON JUNE 16, 2023, PIMCO ENTERED INTO A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE SEC RELATING TO CERTAIN DISCLOSURES IN THE 2014 AND 2015
ANNUAL SHAREHOLDER REPORTS OF PIMCO GLOBAL STOCKSPLUS & INCOME FUND ("PGP") REGARDING PGP'S USE OF PAIRED INTEREST RATE SWAPS
IN ITS PORTFOLIO. UNDER THE TERMS OF THE SETTLEMENT, PIMCO AGREED TO PAY TO THE SEC A CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $6.5
MILLION. PRIOR TO THE SEC'S INVESTIGATION, PIMCO HAD UPDATED THE DISCLOSURES IN PGP'S 2016 ANNUAL SHAREHOLDER REPORT.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:

If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Settled
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
06/16/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 6,500,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
PURSUANT TO THE SETTLEMENT, THE SEC ORDERED A CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $6.5 MILLION. THE PENALTY WILL BE PAID
WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE ENTRY OF THE ORDER. NO PORTION OF THE PENALTY WAS WAIVED.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON JUNE 16, 2023, THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ("SEC") ANNOUNCED AN AGREEMENT WITH PIMCO TO SETTLE THE CHARGES
RELATING TO PGP. THE SEC ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER IS FINAL. THE CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY WILL BE PAID WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE ENTRY OF THE
ORDER.
regulatory · block 5PDF pages 1034–1036
Regulator name — filed text
ICE FUTURES U.S. ("ICE")
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Settled

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON MARCH 21, 2025, ICE ANNOUNCED AN AGREEMENT WITH PIMCO TO SETTLE THE ALLEGATIONS RELATING TO PIMCO'S TRADING IN THE CB1. THE MONETARY PENALTY WAS PAID ON MARCH 27, 2025.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

ON MARCH 19, 2025, A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE EXCHANGE'S BUSINESS CONDUCT COMMITTEE ("BCC") DETERMINED THAT PIMCO MAY HAVE VIOLATED EXCHANGE RULE 4.02(C) IN SEPTEMBER 2023, WHEN EMPLOYEES PLACED ORDERS, INCLUDING THROUGH DIFFERENT AND INDEPENDENT EXECUTING BROKERS, FOR TWO ACCOUNTS WITH COMMON BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP IN THE CALIFORNIA CARBON ALLOWANCE VINTAGE 2023 CONTRACT ("CB1"), A PORTION OF WHICH ULTIMATELY MATCHED OPPOSITE ONE ANOTHER. BASED ON INFORMATION OBTAINED, IT APPEARED THAT THE EMPLOYEES DID NOT INTEND FOR THE ORDERS TO MATCH, HOWEVER, THEY SHOULD HAVE KNOWN THAT THE ORDERS WOULD TRADE OPPOSITE ONE ANOTHER.

Sanction detail — filed text

UNDER THE TERMS OF THE SETTLEMENT, A FINE OF $100,000 WAS PAID BY THE REGISTRANT ON MARCH 27, 2025. NO PORTION OF THE PENALTY WAS WAIVED.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed

This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
ICE FUTURES U.S. ("ICE")
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
03/19/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
ICE FUTURES CASE NO. 2024-005
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Futures - Commodity
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
ON MARCH 19, 2025, A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE EXCHANGE'S BUSINESS CONDUCT COMMITTEE ("BCC") DETERMINED THAT PIMCO MAY HAVE VIOLATED
EXCHANGE RULE 4.02(C) IN SEPTEMBER 2023, WHEN EMPLOYEES PLACED ORDERS, INCLUDING THROUGH DIFFERENT AND INDEPENDENT EXECUTING
BROKERS, FOR TWO ACCOUNTS WITH COMMON BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP IN THE CALIFORNIA CARBON ALLOWANCE VINTAGE 2023 CONTRACT ("CB1"),
A PORTION OF WHICH ULTIMATELY MATCHED OPPOSITE ONE ANOTHER. BASED ON INFORMATION OBTAINED, IT APPEARED THAT THE EMPLOYEES DID
NOT INTEND FOR THE ORDERS TO MATCH, HOWEVER, THEY SHOULD HAVE KNOWN THAT THE ORDERS WOULD TRADE OPPOSITE ONE ANOTHER.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Settled
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
03/19/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?

 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
UNDER THE TERMS OF THE SETTLEMENT, A FINE OF $100,000 WAS PAID BY THE REGISTRANT ON MARCH 27, 2025. NO PORTION OF THE PENALTY
WAS WAIVED.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON MARCH 21, 2025, ICE ANNOUNCED AN AGREEMENT WITH PIMCO TO SETTLE THE ALLEGATIONS RELATING TO PIMCO'S TRADING IN THE CB1. THE
MONETARY PENALTY WAS PAID ON MARCH 27, 2025.
regulatory · block 6PDF pages 1036–1038
Regulator name — filed text
NEW YORK MERCANTILE EXCHANGE ("NYMEX")
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 26,220.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Settled

Action status / disposition — filed text

PURSUANT TO AN OFFER OF SETTLEMENT IN WHICH PACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC ("PIMCO") NEITHER ADMITTED NOR DENIED THE RULE VIOLATION OR FACTUAL FINDINGS UPON WHICH THE PENALTY WAS BASED, ON MAY 7, 2025, A PANEL OF THE NYMEX BUSINESS CONDUCT COMMITTEE ("PANEL") FOUND THAT AT THE CLOSE OF BUSINESS ON SEPTEMBER 17, 2024, PIMCO HELD A SHORT FUTURES-EQUIVALENT POSITION OF 6,325 CONTRACTS IN OCTOBER 2024 CRUDE OIL FUTURES, WHICH WAS 325 CONTRACTS (5.42%) OVER THE POSITION LIMIT. PIMCO LIQUIDATED ITS OVERAGE POSITION THE NEXT TRADING DAY, WHICH RESULTED IN A $11,220.00 PROFIT. THE PANEL FOUND THAT PIMCO VIOLATED RULE 562 AS A RESULT OF THE FOREGOING. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SETTLEMENT OFFER, THE PANEL ORDERED PIMCO TO PAY A $15,000 FINE AND DISGORGE $11,220.00
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

THE REGISTRANT WAS ALLEGED TO HAVE VIOLATED NYMEX RULE 562 BY EXCEEDING POSITION LIMITS IN THE OCTOBER 2024 CRUDE OIL FUTURES AS OF THE CLOSE OF BUSINESS ON SEPTEMBER 17, 2024.

Sanction detail — filed text

UNDER THE TERMS OF THE SETTLEMENT, A FINE OF $26,220 WAS PAID BY THE REGISTRANT ON MAY 9, 2025. NO PORTION OF THE PENALTY WAS WAIVED.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No

NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
NEW YORK MERCANTILE EXCHANGE ("NYMEX")
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
05/07/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
NYMEX 24-1817-BC
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Futures - Commodity
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE REGISTRANT WAS ALLEGED TO HAVE VIOLATED NYMEX RULE 562 BY EXCEEDING POSITION LIMITS IN THE OCTOBER 2024 CRUDE OIL FUTURES AS
OF THE CLOSE OF BUSINESS ON SEPTEMBER 17, 2024.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Settled
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
05/09/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 26,220.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
UNDER THE TERMS OF THE SETTLEMENT, A FINE OF $26,220 WAS PAID BY THE REGISTRANT ON MAY 9, 2025. NO PORTION OF THE PENALTY WAS
WAIVED.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
PURSUANT TO AN OFFER OF SETTLEMENT IN WHICH PACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC ("PIMCO") NEITHER ADMITTED NOR DENIED
THE RULE VIOLATION OR FACTUAL FINDINGS UPON WHICH THE PENALTY WAS BASED, ON MAY 7, 2025, A PANEL OF THE NYMEX BUSINESS CONDUCT

COMMITTEE ("PANEL") FOUND THAT AT THE CLOSE OF BUSINESS ON SEPTEMBER 17, 2024, PIMCO HELD A SHORT FUTURES-EQUIVALENT POSITION OF
6,325 CONTRACTS IN OCTOBER 2024 CRUDE OIL FUTURES, WHICH WAS 325 CONTRACTS (5.42%) OVER THE POSITION LIMIT. PIMCO LIQUIDATED ITS
OVERAGE POSITION THE NEXT TRADING DAY, WHICH RESULTED IN A $11,220.00 PROFIT. THE PANEL FOUND THAT PIMCO VIOLATED RULE 562 AS A
RESULT OF THE FOREGOING. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SETTLEMENT OFFER, THE PANEL ORDERED PIMCO TO PAY A $15,000 FINE AND DISGORGE
$11,220.00

* Metrics are based on the latest available data, including Form ADV filings, brochures, and relationship summaries pulled from the SEC IAPD, and may be subject to change. Learn what is included in the Rialytix data. Please refer to the firm's official disclosures for the most accurate information using their CRD number. This is not investment advice.