Firm profile

Credicorp Capital Advisors LLC

MIAMI, FLCRD 290081Registration Status: ApprovedEffective since September 9, 2021SEC # 801-122281Latest ADV April 29, 2026

Credicorp Capital Advisors LLC is an SEC registered investment adviser organized as a limited liability company with a primary office location in Miami, FL. Its latest Form ADV filing, dated April 29, 2026, reports $1.6B in regulatory assets under management, 26 employees, 2 offices, and 369 accounts.

Assets Under Management
$1.6B
Employees
26
Offices
2 offices
Total Clients
369

Associated firm names

7 names listed
  • CREDICORP CAPITAL ADVISORS LLC
  • VICCTUS MULTI FAMILY OFFICE
  • ULTRALAT INVESTMENT ADVISOR
  • ULTRAADVISORS, LLC

Leadership

4 roles identified
CEOCarlos A. Coll
CCOArturo De La Espriella
CFOSteven F. Singer

Advisory services offered

2 types reported
Portfolio management for businesses
Portfolio management for individuals and small businesses

Fee models offered

3 types reported
Asset based fees
Hourly charges
Other fee arrangements

Offices & Contact

Primary office

MIAMI, Florida, United States

Loading map…

Primary office regionOther reported regions

Shading shows states and countries with reported offices. Cities are listed below; shading does not indicate service coverage.

Florida

MIAMIPrimary office

2 office records listed · 2 total offices reported. Counts can use different reporting dates. SEC filers may list only their largest 25 additional offices.

Contact and digital presence

ADV profile links

Regulatory Assets Under Management Breakdown

Total regulatory assets under management$1.6Bas of April 29, 2026
Discretionary52.8%
$835M
53% of total RAUM52.8%
Non-discretionary47.2%
$745M
47% of total RAUM47.2%
Regulatory assets under management are split between discretionary and non-discretionary assets.

Client Coverage Demographics

Top client segmentCorporations represent 62.3% of total clients.
Top client categories% of clientsClients
1
Corporations
62.3%
230
2
HNWI
25.5%
94
3
Individuals
12.2%
45

Assets under management Growth by Quarter

Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.

Total AUM$1.6B
Total Accounts369
10Y AUM Change+$1.6B

Private Funds

Private funds reported by Credicorp Capital Advisors LLC

Loading private fund disclosures…

Employee Growth by Quarter

Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.

Total Employees26
Clients per Employee14:1
10Y Employee Change+23 (+766.7%)

Historical AUM and employee figures reflect available SEC Form ADV filings under this CRD. Filing gaps may reflect registration status changes, dormant periods, state registration periods, firm restructuring, or other reporting changes. Rialytix does not interpolate missing periods.


Ownership

Reported direct and indirect ownership ranges

Each range applies to a separate reported relationship and should not be added together.

Reported ownership ranges

Highlighted bands show the percentage range reported in Form ADV.

0%25%50%75%100%
CREDICORP CAPITAL USA, INCDirect owner · Schedule AInterest in CREDICORP CAPITAL ADVISORS LLC
75%+
CREDICORP LTD.Indirect owner · Schedule BInterest in CREDICORP CAPITAL LTD.
75%+
CREDICORP CAPITAL LTD.Indirect owner · Schedule BInterest in CREDICORP CAPITAL USA, INC
75%+

Bars represent the reported range at that individual ownership step, not an estimated percentage of the advisory firm. Indirect relationships may refer to intermediate entities rather than directly to Credicorp Capital Advisors LLC.

Reported ownership and control details

Form ADV · Filing date 2026-04-29 · Schedules A and B

6 entries
#Owner / person & roleInterest in entityReported interestControl personTitle / status acquiredSource
1CARLOS ANDRES COLLCHIEF OPERATING OFFICER / CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER / DIRECTORIndividualCREDICORP CAPITAL ADVISORS LLCLess than 5%Code NAYesCHIEF OPERATING OFFICER / CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER / DIRECTOR08/2020Schedule APDF page 26
2STEVEN FREDERIC SINGERCFOIndividualCREDICORP CAPITAL ADVISORS LLCLess than 5%Code NANoCFO09/2017Schedule APDF page 26
3CREDICORP CAPITAL USA, INCMEMBERDomestic entityCREDICORP CAPITAL ADVISORS LLC75% or moreCode EYesMEMBER03/2018Schedule APDF page 26
4ARTURO DE LA ESPRIELLACHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICERIndividualCREDICORP CAPITAL ADVISORS LLCLess than 5%Code NAYesCHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER04/2023Schedule APDF page 26
5CREDICORP LTD.OWNERForeign entityCREDICORP CAPITAL LTD.75% or moreCode EYesOWNER08/1995Schedule BPDF page 27
6CREDICORP CAPITAL LTD.OWNERForeign entityCREDICORP CAPITAL USA, INC75% or moreCode EYesOWNER08/2012Schedule BPDF page 27

Less than 5% may include zero. Code F identifies a role without specifying a percentage. Reported interests may overlap and may not include every owner. Total indirect ownership is not calculated.

Compliance & Disclosures

Filing dated 4/29/2026 5:03:24 PM

Responses were selected by the RIA in its filing. Questions are shortened for readability; “you” refers to the reporting firm, and some questions also cover advisory affiliates.

RIA or supervised-person involvementThe RIA reported that none of the events below involve the firm or its supervised persons.RIA responseNo
AFelonies2 No

In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:

  • A1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a felony?No
  • A2Been charged with a felony?No
BMisdemeanors2 No

In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:

  • B1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a misdemeanor involving investments, an investment-related business, fraud, false statements or omissions, wrongful taking of property, bribery, perjury, forgery, counterfeiting, or extortion?No
  • B2Been charged with a misdemeanor of the kind listed above?No
CSEC or CFTC actions2 Yes3 No

Has the SEC or CFTC ever:

  • C1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
  • C2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated SEC or CFTC regulations or statutes?Yes
  • C3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
  • C4Entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
  • C5Imposed a civil money penalty on you or an advisory affiliate, or ordered you or an advisory affiliate to cease and desist from any activity?Yes
DOther regulatory actions1 Yes4 No

Has any other federal regulatory agency, state regulatory agency, or foreign financial regulatory authority ever:

  • D1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission, or was dishonest, unfair, or unethical?No
  • D2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related regulations or statutes?Yes
  • D3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
  • D4In the past ten years, entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
  • D5Denied, suspended, or revoked your or an advisory affiliate’s registration or license, or otherwise prevented association with an investment-related business or restricted activities?No
ESelf-regulatory organization actions1 Yes3 No

Has a self-regulatory organization or commodities exchange ever:

  • E1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
  • E2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated its rules, other than a violation designated as a minor rule violation under an SEC-approved plan?Yes
  • E3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
  • E4Disciplined you or an advisory affiliate by expulsion, suspension, barring association with other members, or otherwise restricting activities?No
FProfessional authorizations1 No
  • FHas an authorization to act as an attorney, accountant, or federal contractor granted to you or an advisory affiliate ever been revoked or suspended?No
GPending regulatory proceedings1 No
  • GAre you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a regulatory proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of C, D, or E?No
HCivil judicial actions and proceedings4 No

(1) Court actions

Has a domestic or foreign court:

  • H(1)(a)In the past ten years, enjoined you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
  • H(1)(b)Found that you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related statutes or regulations?No
  • H(1)(c)Dismissed, pursuant to a settlement agreement, an investment-related civil action brought against you or an advisory affiliate by a state or foreign financial regulatory authority?No

(2) Pending civil proceedings

  • H(2)Are you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a civil proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of H(1)?No
Additional DRP filings 4 source blocks

Verbatim excerpts from supporting DRP filings, which may concern the firm or advisory affiliates. Amounts retain their filed labels; no total or attribution is inferred.

regulatory · block 1ULTRABURSATILESPDF pages 27–29
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
ULTRABURSATILES
Regulator name — filed text
STOCK MARKET SELF-REGULATOR (AUTOREGULADOR MERCADO DE VALORES)
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 9,870.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Other

Action status / disposition — filed text

ULTRABURSATILES (NOW ULTRASERFINCO) WAS FINED $9,870 ($33,880,000 COLOMBIAN PESOS) AS RESULT OF REGULATORY ACTION. FINE WAS PAID IN FULL BY ULTRASERFINCO ON 09/07/2015.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

ON SEPTEMBER 3RD AND 4TH OF 2014, THE FIRM ENTERED INTO CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS OF FIXED INCOME COLOMBIAN TREASURIES AND OTHER BONDS WHICH CAUSED THE FIRM TO EXCEED ITS TRADING LIMITS AND CAUSED THE FIRM TO VIOLATE ITS "NET CAPITAL LIMITS" WHICH ARE KNOWN AS "PATRIMONIO TECNICO" IN COLOMBIA. THIS VIOLATION INVOLVED THE AMV (AUTOREGULADOR MERCADO DE VALORES) AND A SETTLEMENT WAS REACHED.

Sanction detail — filed text

ULTRABURSATILES (NOW ULTRASERFINCO) WAS FINED $9,870 ($33,880,000 COLOMBIAN PESOS) AS RESULT OF REGULATORY ACTION. FINE WAS PAID IN FULL BY ULTRASERFINCO ON 09/07/2015.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual

Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
ULTRABURSATILES
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
STOCK MARKET SELF-REGULATOR (AUTOREGULADOR MERCADO DE VALORES)
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
10/23/2014
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
169 (2015)
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Debt - Government
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
ON SEPTEMBER 3RD AND 4TH OF 2014, THE FIRM ENTERED INTO CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS OF FIXED INCOME COLOMBIAN TREASURIES AND OTHER
BONDS WHICH CAUSED THE FIRM TO EXCEED ITS TRADING LIMITS AND CAUSED THE FIRM TO VIOLATE ITS "NET CAPITAL LIMITS" WHICH ARE KNOWN
AS "PATRIMONIO TECNICO" IN COLOMBIA. THIS VIOLATION INVOLVED THE AMV (AUTOREGULADOR MERCADO DE VALORES) AND A SETTLEMENT WAS
REACHED.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Other
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
09/01/2015
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:

12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 9,870.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
ULTRABURSATILES (NOW ULTRASERFINCO) WAS FINED $9,870 ($33,880,000 COLOMBIAN PESOS) AS RESULT OF REGULATORY ACTION. FINE
WAS PAID IN FULL BY ULTRASERFINCO ON 09/07/2015.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ULTRABURSATILES (NOW ULTRASERFINCO) WAS FINED $9,870 ($33,880,000 COLOMBIAN PESOS) AS RESULT OF REGULATORY ACTION. FINE WAS PAID
IN FULL BY ULTRASERFINCO ON 09/07/2015.
regulatory · block 2ULTRASERFINCO S.A.PDF pages 29–31
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
ULTRASERFINCO S.A.
Regulator name — filed text
FINANCIAL SUPERINTENDENCE OF COLOMBIA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 4,413.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Other

Action status / disposition — filed text

ULTRASERFINCO WAS FINED $4,413 ($15,000,000 COLOMBIAN PESOS) AS RESULT OF REGULATORY ACTION. FINE WAS PAID IN FULL BY ULTRASERFINCO ON 12/01/2008.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

FAILURE TO TIMELY SUBMIT A REPORT OF CURRENCY EXCHANGE TRANSACTIONS TO THE COLOMBIAN CENTRAL BANK (BANCO DE LA REPÚBLICA) DUE TO A PLATFORM ERROR AND A HUMAN MISTAKE, SINCE THE PERSON IN CHARGE DID NOT VERIFY THAT THE INFORMATION WAS DULY SUBMITTED. REFERENCED REPORTS ARE REQUIRED TO BE SENT WITHIN TWO BUSINESS DAYS OF CURRENCY EXCHANGE TRANSACTION. THIS FAILURE RESULTED IN AN EXTEMPORARY SUBMISSION OF THE EXCHANGE STATEMENTS AND CONSEQUENTLY IN A BREACH OF AN EXCHANGE OBLIGATION.

Sanction detail — filed text

ULTRASERFINCO WAS FINED $4,413 ($15,000,000 COLOMBIAN PESOS) AS RESULT OF REGULATORY ACTION. FINE WAS PAID IN FULL BY ULTRASERFINCO ON 12/01/2008.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
ULTRASERFINCO S.A.
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item

11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FINANCIAL SUPERINTENDENCE OF COLOMBIA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/15/2008
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
792 2008 (11/13/2008)
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
FAILURE TO TIMELY SUBMIT A REPORT OF CURRENCY EXCHANGE TRANSACTIONS TO THE COLOMBIAN CENTRAL BANK (BANCO DE LA REPÚBLICA) DUE
TO A PLATFORM ERROR AND A HUMAN MISTAKE, SINCE THE PERSON IN CHARGE DID NOT VERIFY THAT THE INFORMATION WAS DULY SUBMITTED.
REFERENCED REPORTS ARE REQUIRED TO BE SENT WITHIN TWO BUSINESS DAYS OF CURRENCY EXCHANGE TRANSACTION. THIS FAILURE RESULTED IN
AN EXTEMPORARY SUBMISSION OF THE EXCHANGE STATEMENTS AND CONSEQUENTLY IN A BREACH OF AN EXCHANGE OBLIGATION.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Other
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
11/13/2008
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 4,413.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:

Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
ULTRASERFINCO WAS FINED $4,413 ($15,000,000 COLOMBIAN PESOS) AS RESULT OF REGULATORY ACTION. FINE WAS PAID IN FULL BY
ULTRASERFINCO ON 12/01/2008.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ULTRASERFINCO WAS FINED $4,413 ($15,000,000 COLOMBIAN PESOS) AS RESULT OF REGULATORY ACTION. FINE WAS PAID IN FULL BY
ULTRASERFINCO ON 12/01/2008.
regulatory · block 3PDF pages 31–33
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
ULTRASERFINCO S.A.
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No

NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FINANCIAL SUPERINTENDENCIA DE COLOMBIA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
11/28/2014
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
029 2018 (01/14/2016)
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
1. DUE TO HUMAN ERROR, THE CLASSIFICATION OF ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE FIRM'S (HEREINAFTER, THE "FIRM")
ASSETS AND THIRD PARTIES ASSETS WAS INCORRECTLY MADE. 2. APPLICABLE REGULATION PROVIDES THAT THE FIRM CANNOT CARRY OUT ITS
ACTIVITIES THROUGH THIRD PARTIES, UNLESS THERE IS AN EXCEPTION IN THE APPLICABLE REGULATION, WHICH WAS NOT THE CASE. BASED ON
ADVICE FROM AN UNRELATED THIRD-PARTY ATTORNEY, CERTAIN EMPLOYEES ESTABLISHED CORPORATIONS IN ORDER TO HAVE THEIR COMMISSIONS
PAID INTO THE CORPORATIONS INSTEAD OF THEIR PERSONAL ACCOUNTS. THE FIRM HAD AGREEMENTS WITH THESE CORPORATIONS. THIS PRACTICE
HAS BEEN ABOLISHED SINCE THEN. 3.APPLICABLE REGULATION HAS ESTABLISHED A MINIMUM LIMIT FOR MARGIN ACCOUNTS WHICH SHALL BE
OBSERVED AT ALL TIMES AND THE FIRM INCURRED IN A BREACH OF THIS OBLIGATION. THE FIRM DID NOT SEGREGATE OR "HOLD" 5% OF THE AMOUNT
OF EACH CLIENT TRANSACTION ON MARGIN PRIOR TO THE TRANSACTION. 4.THE FIRM ACCIDENTALLY REGISTERED A LOAN GRANTED TO A
SHAREHOLDER WHO IS ALSO AN EMPLOYEE, AS A SHAREHOLDER'S LOAN IN THE FIRM'S BALANCE SHEET, ALTHOUGH IT WAS INTENDED TO BE AN
EMPLOYEE`S LOAN. SINCE APPLICABLE REGULATION ESTABLISHES CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND CONDITIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS' LOANS, THE LOAN AS
GRANTED COULD NOT BE GIVEN TO A SHAREHOLDER AS IT WOULD RESULT INTO A BREACH OF A LEGAL RESTRICTION, AS IT WOUND OUT TO BE.
LOANS COULD ONLY BE GRANTED TO EMPLOYEES FOR THE PURPOSE OF HOUSING, EDUCATION OR HEALTH. 5. AN EMPLOYEE FROM THE COMMERCIAL
DEPARTMENT PROVIDED INACCURATE ADVICE TO A CLIENT REGARDING CERTAIN INVESTMENTS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Other
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
01/14/2016
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 20,770.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,

disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
ULTRASERFINCO WAS FINED $20,770 ($70,587,338.67 COLOMBIAN PESOS) AS RESULT OF REGULATORY ACTION. FINE WAS PAID IN FULL BY
ULTRASERFINCO ON 10/01/2017.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ULTRASERFINCO WAS FINED $20,770 ($70,587,338.67 COLOMBIAN PESOS) AS RESULT OF REGULATORY ACTION. FINE WAS PAID IN FULL BY
ULTRASERFINCO ON 10/01/2017.
regulatory · block 4PDF pages 33–35
Regulator name — filed text
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 30,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON JUNE 8, 2023, CREDICORP REMOVED THE ADVERTISEMENTS CONTAINING HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE FROM ITS PUBLIC WEBSITE PRIOR TO BEING CONTACTED BY THE STAFF. TO THE EXTENT THE ADVISER PLANS TO DISSEMINATE ADVERTISEMENTS THAT CONTAIN HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE, IT WILL EVALUATE, UPDATE, AND REVIEW FOR THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ITS IMPLEMENTATION, CREDICORP'S POLICIES AND PROCEDURES CONCERNING ADVERTISEMENTS THAT INCLUDE HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE TO ENSURE THAT ITS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ENSURE THAT THE HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE IS RELEVANT TO THE LIKELY FINANCIAL SITUATION AND INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES OF THE INTENDED AUDIENCE OF THE ADVERTISEMENT.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

THE SEC ALLEGED THAT CREDICORP PUBLISHED COMMUNICATIONS ON ITS PUBLIC WEBSITE THAT CONSTITUTED "ADVERTISEMENTS" BECAUSE THEY OFFERED CREDICORP'S INVESTMENT ADVISORY SERVICES WITH REGARD TO SECURITIES TO PROSPECTIVE CLIENTS AND OFFERED NEW INVESTMENT ADVISORY SERVICES WITH REGARD TO SECURITIES TO CURRENT CLIENTS. THE ADVERTISEMENTS INCLUDED HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE THAT CONSISTED OF PERFORMANCE DERIVED FROM MODEL PORTFOLIOS. THE ADVERTISEMENTS ON THE WEBSITE WERE DISSEMINATED TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC RATHER THAN TO A PARTICULAR INTENDED AUDIENCE. CREDICORP DISSEMINATED HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE IN ADVERTISEMENTS TO A MASS AUDIENCE RATHER THAN PRESENTING HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RELEVANT TO THE LIKELY FINANCIAL SITUATION AND INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES OF THE INTENDED AUDIENCE. IN DOING SO, CREDICORP ALLEGEDLY FAILED TO ADOPT AND IMPLEMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ENSURE THAT THE PERFORMANCE WAS RELEVANT TO THE LIKELY FINANCIAL SITUATION AND INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES OF THE INTENDED AUDIENCE.

Sanction detail — filed text

THE ADVISER WAS ORDERED TO PAY A CIBIL MONEY PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF 30,000 TO THE COMMISSION. THE PAYMENT WAS COMPLETED ON 04/17/2024.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

2.
Principal Sanction:
Cease and Desist
Other Sanctions: 
CENSURED, CIVIL PENALTY OF 30,000
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
09/15/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
3-21911
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE SEC ALLEGED THAT CREDICORP PUBLISHED COMMUNICATIONS ON ITS PUBLIC WEBSITE THAT CONSTITUTED "ADVERTISEMENTS" BECAUSE THEY
OFFERED CREDICORP'S INVESTMENT ADVISORY SERVICES WITH REGARD TO SECURITIES TO PROSPECTIVE CLIENTS AND OFFERED NEW INVESTMENT
ADVISORY SERVICES WITH REGARD TO SECURITIES TO CURRENT CLIENTS. THE ADVERTISEMENTS INCLUDED HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE THAT
CONSISTED OF PERFORMANCE DERIVED FROM MODEL PORTFOLIOS. THE ADVERTISEMENTS ON THE WEBSITE WERE DISSEMINATED TO THE GENERAL
PUBLIC RATHER THAN TO A PARTICULAR INTENDED AUDIENCE. CREDICORP DISSEMINATED HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE IN ADVERTISEMENTS TO A
MASS AUDIENCE RATHER THAN PRESENTING HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RELEVANT TO THE LIKELY FINANCIAL SITUATION AND INVESTMENT
OBJECTIVES OF THE INTENDED AUDIENCE. IN DOING SO, CREDICORP ALLEGEDLY FAILED TO ADOPT AND IMPLEMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ENSURE THAT THE PERFORMANCE WAS RELEVANT TO THE LIKELY FINANCIAL SITUATION AND INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES OF
THE INTENDED AUDIENCE.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
04/12/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 30,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
THE ADVISER WAS ORDERED TO PAY A CIBIL MONEY PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF 30,000 TO THE COMMISSION. THE PAYMENT WAS COMPLETED
ON 04/17/2024.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON JUNE 8, 2023, CREDICORP REMOVED THE ADVERTISEMENTS CONTAINING HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE FROM ITS PUBLIC WEBSITE PRIOR TO
BEING CONTACTED BY THE STAFF. TO THE EXTENT THE ADVISER PLANS TO DISSEMINATE ADVERTISEMENTS THAT CONTAIN HYPOTHETICAL
PERFORMANCE, IT WILL EVALUATE, UPDATE, AND REVIEW FOR THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ITS IMPLEMENTATION, CREDICORP'S POLICIES AND
PROCEDURES CONCERNING ADVERTISEMENTS THAT INCLUDE HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE TO ENSURE THAT ITS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE

REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ENSURE THAT THE HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE IS RELEVANT TO THE LIKELY FINANCIAL SITUATION AND INVESTMENT
OBJECTIVES OF THE INTENDED AUDIENCE OF THE ADVERTISEMENT.

* Metrics are based on the latest available data, including Form ADV filings, brochures, and relationship summaries pulled from the SEC IAPD, and may be subject to change. Learn what is included in the Rialytix data. Please refer to the firm's official disclosures for the most accurate information using their CRD number. This is not investment advice.