Assets under management Growth by Quarter
Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.
Private Funds
Private funds reported by Sanders Morris LLC
Employee Growth by Quarter
Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.
Historical AUM and employee figures reflect available SEC Form ADV filings under this CRD. Filing gaps may reflect registration status changes, dormant periods, state registration periods, firm restructuring, or other reporting changes. Rialytix does not interpolate missing periods.
Ownership
Reported direct and indirect ownership ranges
Reported ownership ranges
Highlighted bands show the percentage range reported in Form ADV.
Bars represent the reported range at that individual ownership step, not an estimated percentage of the advisory firm. Indirect relationships may refer to intermediate entities rather than directly to Sanders Morris LLC.
Reported ownership and control details
Form ADV · Filing date 2026-03-31 · Schedules A and B
| # | Owner / person & role | Interest in entity | Reported interest | Control person | Title / status acquired | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GEORGE LESTER BALLREGISTERED ASSOCIATEIndividual | SANDERS MORRIS LLC | Less than 5%Code NA | No | REGISTERED ASSOCIATE02/2000 | Schedule APDF page 25 |
| 2 | DAVID WILLIAM BLOCKOPERATIONS MANAGERIndividual | SANDERS MORRIS LLC | Less than 5%Code NA | No | OPERATIONS MANAGER01/2016 | Schedule APDF page 25 |
| 3 | ARTHUR HAAG SHERMANMANAGERIndividual | SANDERS MORRIS LLC | Less than 5%Code NA | No | MANAGER05/2017 | Schedule APDF page 25 |
| 4 | PAUL DOUGLAS LYONSFINOP, PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERIndividual | SANDERS MORRIS LLC | Less than 5%Code NA | No | FINOP, PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER03/2018 | Schedule APDF page 25 |
| 5 | TECTONIC FINANCIAL, INC.PARENT COMPANYDomestic entity | SANDERS MORRIS LLC | 75% or moreCode E | Yes | PARENT COMPANY05/2019 | Schedule APDF page 25 |
| 6 | ERICK GEORGE REVELLE KUEBLERCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERIndividual | SANDERS MORRIS LLC | 5% to less than 10%Code A | No | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER01/2026 | Schedule APDF page 25 |
| 7 | DAVID LEE HUNTCHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICERIndividual | SANDERS MORRIS LLC | Less than 5%Code NA | No | CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER01/2026 | Schedule APDF page 25 |
| 8 | ARTHUR HAAG SHERMANOWNERIndividual | TECTONIC FINANCIAL, INC. | 25% to less than 50%Code C | Yes | OWNER02/2007 | Schedule BPDF page 25 |
Less than 5% may include zero. Code F identifies a role without specifying a percentage. Reported interests may overlap and may not include every owner. Total indirect ownership is not calculated.
Compliance & Disclosures
Filing dated 3/31/2026 9:02:36 PM
Responses were selected by the RIA in its filing. Questions are shortened for readability; “you” refers to the reporting firm, and some questions also cover advisory affiliates.
AFelonies2 No
In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:
- A1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a felony?No
- A2Been charged with a felony?No
BMisdemeanors2 No
In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:
- B1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a misdemeanor involving investments, an investment-related business, fraud, false statements or omissions, wrongful taking of property, bribery, perjury, forgery, counterfeiting, or extortion?No
- B2Been charged with a misdemeanor of the kind listed above?No
CSEC or CFTC actions4 Yes1 No
Has the SEC or CFTC ever:
- C1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?Yes
- C2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated SEC or CFTC regulations or statutes?Yes
- C3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- C4Entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?Yes
- C5Imposed a civil money penalty on you or an advisory affiliate, or ordered you or an advisory affiliate to cease and desist from any activity?Yes
DOther regulatory actions2 Yes3 No
Has any other federal regulatory agency, state regulatory agency, or foreign financial regulatory authority ever:
- D1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission, or was dishonest, unfair, or unethical?No
- D2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related regulations or statutes?Yes
- D3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- D4In the past ten years, entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?Yes
- D5Denied, suspended, or revoked your or an advisory affiliate’s registration or license, or otherwise prevented association with an investment-related business or restricted activities?No
ESelf-regulatory organization actions1 Yes3 No
Has a self-regulatory organization or commodities exchange ever:
- E1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
- E2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated its rules, other than a violation designated as a minor rule violation under an SEC-approved plan?Yes
- E3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- E4Disciplined you or an advisory affiliate by expulsion, suspension, barring association with other members, or otherwise restricting activities?No
FProfessional authorizations1 No
- FHas an authorization to act as an attorney, accountant, or federal contractor granted to you or an advisory affiliate ever been revoked or suspended?No
GPending regulatory proceedings1 No
- GAre you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a regulatory proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of C, D, or E?No
HCivil judicial actions and proceedings4 No
(1) Court actions
Has a domestic or foreign court:
- H(1)(a)In the past ten years, enjoined you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
- H(1)(b)Found that you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related statutes or regulations?No
- H(1)(c)Dismissed, pursuant to a settlement agreement, an investment-related civil action brought against you or an advisory affiliate by a state or foreign financial regulatory authority?No
(2) Pending civil proceedings
- H(2)Are you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a civil proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of H(1)?No
Additional DRP filings 15 source blocks
Verbatim excerpts from supporting DRP filings, which may concern the firm or advisory affiliates. Amounts retain their filed labels; no total or attribution is inferred.
regulatory · block 1KISSINGER, WILLIAM, IRVINPDF pages 26–27
- Advisory affiliate name — filed text
- KISSINGER, WILLIAM, IRVIN
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Order
Action status / disposition — filed text
INITIAL DECISION BY CAROL FOX FOELOCK, ADMINSITRATIVE JUDGE, ISSUED ON FEBRUARY 15, 2005, DISMISSING THE ADMINSITRATIVE PROCEEDING AS TO MR. KISSINGER. SEC APPEALED TO THE COMMISSION. THE COMMISSION HEARD THE APPEAL ON NOVEMBER 14, 2005, AND ISSUED ITS OPINION AND ORDER ON JULY 11, 2006.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
RECOMMENDATION OF THE SALE OF CLASS B MUTUAL FUND SHARES TO RETAIL CUSTOMERS WITHOUT DISCLSOURE THAT CLASS A SHARES WOULD HAVE PRODUCED HIGHER RETURNS BECAUSE OF THE AVAILABILITY OF BREAKPOINTS AND LOWER ANNUAL EXPENSES
Sanction detail — filed text
DISGORGEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $36,170, PLUS PREJUDGMENT INTEREST PAID REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVE.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE CRD Number: 1057368 This advisory affiliate is a Firm an Individual Registered: Yes No Name: KISSINGER, WILLIAM, IRVIN (For individuals, Last, First, Middle) This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 2. Principal Sanction: Other Sanctions: 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 07/15/2003 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: 3-11179 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): KISSINGER ADVISORY INC. 6. Principal Product Type: Mutual Fund(s) Other Product Types: 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): RECOMMENDATION OF THE SALE OF CLASS B MUTUAL FUND SHARES TO RETAIL CUSTOMERS WITHOUT DISCLSOURE THAT CLASS A SHARES WOULD HAVE PRODUCED HIGHER RETURNS BECAUSE OF THE AVAILABILITY OF BREAKPOINTS AND LOWER ANNUAL EXPENSES 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: INITIAL DECISION BY CAROL FOX FOELOCK, ADMINSITRATIVE JUDGE, ISSUED ON FEBRUARY 15, 2005, DISMISSING THE ADMINSITRATIVE PROCEEDING AS TO MR. KISSINGER. SEC APPEALED TO THE COMMISSION. THE COMMISSION HEARD THE APPEAL ON NOVEMBER 14, 2005, AND ISSUED ITS OPINION AND ORDER ON JULY 11, 2006. If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Order 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 07/11/2006 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: DISGORGEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $36,170, PLUS PREJUDGMENT INTEREST PAID REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVE. 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). INITIAL DECISION BY CAROL FOX FOELOCK, ADMINSITRATIVE JUDGE, ISSUED ON FEBRUARY 15, 2005, DISMISSING THE ADMINSITRATIVE PROCEEDING AS TO MR. KISSINGER. SEC APPEALED TO THE COMMISSION. THE COMMISSION HEARD THE APPEAL ON NOVEMBER 14, 2005, AND ISSUED ITS OPINION AND ORDER ON JULY 11, 2006.
regulatory · block 2PDF pages 27–29
- Regulator name — filed text
- FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 450,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Action status / disposition — filed text
BY AGREEING TO THE TERMS OF THE ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT THAT MADE SOUND ECONOMIC SENSE, AND WITHOUT ADMITTING ANY OF THE ALLEGATIONS AND FINDINGS, SMH CAPITAL IS PLEASED TO PUT THIS MATTER, WHICH AROSE IN EARLY 2005, AND RELATED TO MATTERS THAT OCCURRED BETWEEN 2000 AND 2004, BEHIND IT. THE AMOUNT OF THE SETTLEMENT WAS FULLY RESERVED IN OUR REPORTED RESULTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007. SMH CAPITAL STRIVES TO ENSURE THAT IT OPERATES ALL ITS BUSINESSES UNDER BEST PRACTICES AND IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH ALL REGULATIONS. WE CONTINUE TO REVIEW OUR POLICIES AND PROCEDURES WITH OUR PRIME BROKERAGE AND RELATED HEDGE FUND BUSINESSES TO ENSURE THAT WE REMAIN FOCUSED ON OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCE.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
SECTION 17(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT, RULE 17A-4 THEREUNDER, NASD RULES 1031, 2110, 2210(D)(1), 2210(B)(1), 2210(B)(2)(A), 3010, 3110: IN JULY 2000, SMH CAPITAL INC. (THE "FIRM") EXPANDED ITS BUSINESS BY ACQUIRING A CORPORATION, WHICH BECAME ITS PRIME BROKERAGE SERVICES (PBS) DIVISION. THE FIRM BEGAN OFFERING A VARIETY OF SERVICES TO HEDGE FUND CLIENTS THROUGH ITS PBS DIVISION. FROM JULY 2000 THROUGH AT LEAST DECEMBER 2005, THE FIRM FAILED TO ESTABLISH, MAINTAIN AND ENFORCE ADEQUATE PROCEDURES AND SYSTEMS THAT: A) WERE TAILORED TO ENSURE THAT ITS HEDGE FUND, PRIME BROKERAGE SERVICES, AND SOFT DOLLAR ACTIVITIES WERE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS AND NASD RULES; AND B) PERTAINED TO SUPERVISION OF EMPLOYEES WHO PROVIDED SERVICES TO FUNDS UTILIZING THE PBS DIVISION'S PLATFORM. AS A RESULT, THE FIRM ALLOWED IMPROPER PAYMENTS OF ABOUT $325,000 IN SOFT DOLLARS TO ONE HEDGE FUND MANAGER. THE FIRM LACKED ADEQUATE PROCEDURES CONCERNING THE CONTENTS OF HEDGE FUND SALES MATERIALS PREPARED AND DISSEMINATED BY THE FIRM AND DISTRIBUTED SALES LITERATURE THAT DID NOT ADEQUATELY DISCLOSE MATERIAL INVESTMENT RISKS TO POTENTIAL INVESTORS IN ACCORDANCE WITH NASD NOTICE TO MEMBERS 03-07. FROM AT LEAST JANUARY 2003 TO DECEMBER 2004, THE FIRM FAILED TO RETAIN CERTAIN E-MAILS AND INSTANT MESSAGES SENT TO AND RECEIVED BY CERTAIN EMPLOYEES IN THE PBS DIVISION. THE FIRM ALSO PERMITTED AN EMPLOYEE OF THE PBS DIVISION, TO ENGAGE IN ACTIVITIES REQUIRING HIM TO BE REGISTERED WITHOUT OBTAINING THE NECESSARY REGISTRATION. IN APRIL 2002, THE FIRM MODIFIED CERTAIN BROKERS' COMPENSATION STRUCTURE SO THAT THEY SHARED IN THE PBS PROFIT POOL, DERIVED IN PART FROM THOSE COMMISSIONS THE FIRM EARNED ON THE FUND'S TRADING. AS A RESULT, CONTRARY TO RESTRICTIONS, FROM APRIL 2002 TO JUNE 2004, THE BROKERS SHARED INDIRECTLY IN THE COMMISSIONS THE FIRM EARNED ON THE FUND'S TRADING BUT DID NOT AMEND THE FUND'S OFFERING DOCUMENT.
Sanction detail — filed text
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS. THE FIRM IS CENSURED AND FINED $450,000, WHICH WAS PAID IN JANUARU 2008. PURSUANT TO ITS UNDERTAKING THE FIRM ENGAGED AN INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT TO REVIEW ITS SUPERVISORY SYSTEMS AND PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS PRIME BROKERAGE OPERATIONS.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE No Information Filed This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY 2. Principal Sanction: Other Sanctions: 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 01/09/2008 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: EAF0401150001 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: Other Other Product Types: HEDGE FUNDS 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): SECTION 17(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT, RULE 17A-4 THEREUNDER, NASD RULES 1031, 2110, 2210(D)(1), 2210(B)(1), 2210(B)(2)(A), 3010, 3110: IN JULY 2000, SMH CAPITAL INC. (THE "FIRM") EXPANDED ITS BUSINESS BY ACQUIRING A CORPORATION, WHICH BECAME ITS PRIME BROKERAGE SERVICES (PBS) DIVISION. THE FIRM BEGAN OFFERING A VARIETY OF SERVICES TO HEDGE FUND CLIENTS THROUGH ITS PBS DIVISION. FROM JULY 2000 THROUGH AT LEAST DECEMBER 2005, THE FIRM FAILED TO ESTABLISH, MAINTAIN AND ENFORCE ADEQUATE PROCEDURES AND SYSTEMS THAT: A) WERE TAILORED TO ENSURE THAT ITS HEDGE FUND, PRIME BROKERAGE SERVICES, AND SOFT DOLLAR ACTIVITIES WERE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS AND NASD RULES; AND B) PERTAINED TO SUPERVISION OF EMPLOYEES WHO PROVIDED SERVICES TO FUNDS UTILIZING THE PBS DIVISION'S PLATFORM. AS A RESULT, THE FIRM ALLOWED IMPROPER PAYMENTS OF ABOUT $325,000 IN SOFT DOLLARS TO ONE HEDGE FUND MANAGER. THE FIRM LACKED ADEQUATE PROCEDURES CONCERNING THE CONTENTS OF HEDGE FUND SALES MATERIALS PREPARED AND DISSEMINATED BY THE FIRM AND DISTRIBUTED SALES LITERATURE THAT DID NOT ADEQUATELY DISCLOSE MATERIAL INVESTMENT RISKS TO POTENTIAL INVESTORS IN ACCORDANCE WITH NASD NOTICE TO MEMBERS 03-07. FROM AT LEAST JANUARY 2003 TO DECEMBER 2004, THE FIRM FAILED TO RETAIN CERTAIN E-MAILS AND INSTANT MESSAGES SENT TO AND RECEIVED BY CERTAIN EMPLOYEES IN THE PBS DIVISION. THE FIRM ALSO PERMITTED AN EMPLOYEE OF THE PBS DIVISION, TO ENGAGE IN ACTIVITIES REQUIRING HIM TO BE REGISTERED WITHOUT OBTAINING THE NECESSARY REGISTRATION. IN APRIL 2002, THE FIRM MODIFIED CERTAIN BROKERS' COMPENSATION STRUCTURE SO THAT THEY SHARED IN THE PBS PROFIT POOL, DERIVED IN PART FROM THOSE COMMISSIONS THE FIRM EARNED ON THE FUND'S TRADING. AS A RESULT, CONTRARY TO RESTRICTIONS, FROM APRIL 2002 TO JUNE 2004, THE BROKERS SHARED INDIRECTLY IN THE COMMISSIONS THE FIRM EARNED ON THE FUND'S TRADING BUT DID NOT AMEND THE FUND'S OFFERING DOCUMENT. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC) 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 01/09/2008 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 450,000.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: UNDERTAKING Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS. THE FIRM IS CENSURED AND FINED $450,000, WHICH WAS PAID IN JANUARU 2008. PURSUANT TO ITS UNDERTAKING THE FIRM ENGAGED AN INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT TO REVIEW ITS SUPERVISORY SYSTEMS AND PROCEDURES WITH RESPECT TO ITS PRIME BROKERAGE OPERATIONS. 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). BY AGREEING TO THE TERMS OF THE ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT THAT MADE SOUND ECONOMIC SENSE, AND WITHOUT ADMITTING ANY OF THE ALLEGATIONS AND FINDINGS, SMH CAPITAL IS PLEASED TO PUT THIS MATTER, WHICH AROSE IN EARLY 2005, AND RELATED TO MATTERS THAT OCCURRED BETWEEN 2000 AND 2004, BEHIND IT. THE AMOUNT OF THE SETTLEMENT WAS FULLY RESERVED IN OUR REPORTED RESULTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007. SMH CAPITAL STRIVES TO ENSURE THAT IT OPERATES ALL ITS BUSINESSES UNDER BEST PRACTICES AND IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH ALL REGULATIONS. WE CONTINUE TO REVIEW OUR POLICIES AND PROCEDURES WITH OUR PRIME BROKERAGE AND RELATED HEDGE FUND BUSINESSES TO ENSURE THAT WE REMAIN FOCUSED ON OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCE.
regulatory · block 3PDF pages 29–31
- Regulator name — filed text
- FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 45,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Action status / disposition — filed text
SEE ANSWER TO NO. 7 ABOVE.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
FROM DECEMBER 2002 THROUGH APRIL 2004, THE FIRM FAILED TO ESTABLISH, MAINTAIN, OR ENFORCE A SUPERVISORY SYSTEM AND PROCEDURES THAT WERE REASONABLY DESIGNED TO DETECT AND PREVENT MARKET TIMING ACTIVITIES THAT CONTRAVENED APPLICABLE MUTUAL FUND PROSPECTUS TERMS. FIRM FAILED TO TAKE ANY SUPERVISORY ACTION AGAINST A REPRESENTATIVE WHO HAD RECEIVED A NUMBER OF "BLOCK LETTERS" FOR EXCESSIVE TRADING ACTIVITY FROM SEVERAL MUTUAL FUNDS TO ENSURE THAT HE DID NIT CONTINUE HIS MARKET TIMING TRADING ACTIVITIES IN THE SUBJECT MUTUAL FUNDS.
Sanction detail — filed text
FINE PAID IN JULY 2008.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE No Information Filed This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY 2. Principal Sanction: Censure Other Sanctions: FINE 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 06/12/2008 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: E062004031201 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: Mutual Fund(s) Other Product Types: 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): FROM DECEMBER 2002 THROUGH APRIL 2004, THE FIRM FAILED TO ESTABLISH, MAINTAIN, OR ENFORCE A SUPERVISORY SYSTEM AND PROCEDURES THAT WERE REASONABLY DESIGNED TO DETECT AND PREVENT MARKET TIMING ACTIVITIES THAT CONTRAVENED APPLICABLE MUTUAL FUND PROSPECTUS TERMS. FIRM FAILED TO TAKE ANY SUPERVISORY ACTION AGAINST A REPRESENTATIVE WHO HAD RECEIVED A NUMBER OF "BLOCK LETTERS" FOR EXCESSIVE TRADING ACTIVITY FROM SEVERAL MUTUAL FUNDS TO ENSURE THAT HE DID NIT CONTINUE HIS MARKET TIMING TRADING ACTIVITIES IN THE SUBJECT MUTUAL FUNDS. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC) 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 06/12/2008 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 45,000.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: FINE PAID IN JULY 2008. 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). SEE ANSWER TO NO. 7 ABOVE.
regulatory · block 4PDF pages 31–33
- Regulator name — filed text
- NASD
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 10,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Action status / disposition — filed text
SMH HAS TAKEN THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS IN CONNECTION WITH THE DISPLAY OF CUSTOMER LIMIT ORDERS. IN APRIL 2003, SMH WITHDREW AS A MARKET MAKER IN THREE SECURITIES THAT ACCOUNTED FOR MORE THAN 75% OF THE TRANSACTIONS IDENTIFIED BY THE NASD. IN ADDITION, SMH CHANGED ITS SYSTEM FOR DISPLAYING LIMIT ORDERS FROM A MANUAL PROCESS TO AN AUTOMATED PROCESS WHICH DISPLAYS CUSTOMER LIMIT ORDER INSTANTANEOUSLY UPON RECEIPT AND UPDATED ITS WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
THE NASD ALLEGES THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO DISPLAY IMMEDIATELY CUSTOMER LIMIT ORDER IN NASDAQ SECURITIES IN ITS PUBLIC QUOTATION, WHEN EACH SUCH ORDER WAS AT A PRICE THAT WOULD HAVE IMPROVED THE FIRM'S BID OR OFFER IN EACH SUCH SECURITY; OR WHEN THE ORDER WAS PRICED EQUAL TO THE FIRM'S BID OR OFFER AND THE NBBO FOR EACH SECURITY, AND THE SIZE OF THE ORDER REPRESENTED MORE THAN A DE MINIMIS CHANGE IN RELATION TO THE SIZE ASSOCIATED WITH THE FIRM'S BID OR OFFER IN EACH SUCH SECURITY; AND THE FIRM'S SUPERVISORY SYSTEM DID NOT PROVIDE FOR SUPERVISION REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE WITH RESPECT TO THE APPLICABLE SECURITIES LAWS AND REGULATIONS, AND THE RULES OF NASD, CONCERNING THE DISPLAY RULE. SPECIFICALLY THE FIRM'S SUPERVISORY SYSTEMS DID NOT INCLUDE WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES PROVIDING A STATEMENT OF THE SUPERVISORY STEP(S) TO BE TAKEN BY THE IDENTIFIED PERSON.
Sanction detail — filed text
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE ALLEGATIONS, RESPONDENT FIRM CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDING; THEREFORE, FIRM IS CENSURED AND FINED $10,000 (CONSISTING OF A $5,000 FINE FOR THE LIMIT ORDER DISPLAY VIOLATIONS AND A $5,000 FINE FOR THE SUPERVISION VIOLATIONS) AND AN UNDERTAKING TO REVISE THE FIRM'S WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE No Information Filed This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) NASD 2. Principal Sanction: Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s) Other Sanctions: 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 09/09/2005 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: 20042000096-01 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: Other Other Product Types: UNSPECIFIED SECURITIES 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): THE NASD ALLEGES THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO DISPLAY IMMEDIATELY CUSTOMER LIMIT ORDER IN NASDAQ SECURITIES IN ITS PUBLIC QUOTATION, WHEN EACH SUCH ORDER WAS AT A PRICE THAT WOULD HAVE IMPROVED THE FIRM'S BID OR OFFER IN EACH SUCH SECURITY; OR WHEN THE ORDER WAS PRICED EQUAL TO THE FIRM'S BID OR OFFER AND THE NBBO FOR EACH SECURITY, AND THE SIZE OF THE ORDER REPRESENTED MORE THAN A DE MINIMIS CHANGE IN RELATION TO THE SIZE ASSOCIATED WITH THE FIRM'S BID OR OFFER IN EACH SUCH SECURITY; AND THE FIRM'S SUPERVISORY SYSTEM DID NOT PROVIDE FOR SUPERVISION REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE WITH RESPECT TO THE APPLICABLE SECURITIES LAWS AND REGULATIONS, AND THE RULES OF NASD, CONCERNING THE DISPLAY RULE. SPECIFICALLY THE FIRM'S SUPERVISORY SYSTEMS DID NOT INCLUDE WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES PROVIDING A STATEMENT OF THE SUPERVISORY STEP(S) TO BE TAKEN BY THE IDENTIFIED PERSON. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC) 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 09/09/2005 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 10,000.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: UNDERTAKING Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE ALLEGATIONS, RESPONDENT FIRM CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDING; THEREFORE, FIRM IS CENSURED AND FINED $10,000 (CONSISTING OF A $5,000 FINE FOR THE LIMIT ORDER DISPLAY VIOLATIONS AND A $5,000 FINE FOR THE SUPERVISION VIOLATIONS) AND AN UNDERTAKING TO REVISE THE FIRM'S WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES. 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). SMH HAS TAKEN THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS IN CONNECTION WITH THE DISPLAY OF CUSTOMER LIMIT ORDERS. IN APRIL 2003, SMH WITHDREW AS A MARKET MAKER IN THREE SECURITIES THAT ACCOUNTED FOR MORE THAN 75% OF THE TRANSACTIONS IDENTIFIED BY THE NASD. IN ADDITION, SMH CHANGED ITS SYSTEM FOR DISPLAYING LIMIT ORDERS FROM A MANUAL PROCESS TO AN AUTOMATED PROCESS WHICH DISPLAYS CUSTOMER LIMIT ORDER INSTANTANEOUSLY UPON RECEIPT AND UPDATED ITS WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES.
regulatory · block 5PDF pages 33–35
- Regulator name — filed text
- FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 10,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Action status / disposition — filed text
NASD RULES 6130, 6955(A) - FIRM SUBMITTED ERRONEOUS REPORTS TO THE NASDAQ MARKET CENTER (NMC) IN THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO REPORT TO THE NMC THE CORRECT SYMBOL INDICATING WHETHER IT EXECUTED TRANSACTIONS IN REPORTABLE SECURITIES AS PRINCIPAL, RISKLESS PRINCIPAL OR AGENT; AND THE CANCELLATION OF TRADES PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO THE NMC; AND REPORTED AN INCORRECT EXECUTION TIME TO THE NMC. THE FIRM TRANSMITTED TO THE ORDER AUDIT TRAIL SYSTEM (OATS) REPORTS THAT CONTAINED INACCURATE, INCOMPLETE OR IMPROPERLY FORMATTED DATA - SUBMITTED INFORMATION IN THE WRONG OATS REPORTS; FAILED TO SUBMIT REPORTS WHEN REQUIRED AND SUBMITTED INCORRECT INFORMATION IN REPORTS.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
NASD RULES 6130, 6955(A) - SMH CAPITAL INC. SUBMITTED ERRONEOUS REPORTS TO THE NASDAQ MARKET CENTER (NMC) IN THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO REPORT TO THE NMC THE CORRECT SYMBOL INDICATING WHETHER IT EXECUTED TRANSACTIONS IN REPORTABLE SECURITIES AS PRINCIPAL, RISKLESS PRINCIPAL OR AGENT; AND THE CANCELLATION OF TRADES PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO THE NMC; AND REPORTED AN INCORRECT EXECUTION TIME TO THE NMC. THE FIRM TRANSMITTED TO THE ORDER AUDIT TRAIL SYSTEM (OATS) REPORTS THAT CONTAINED INACCURATE, INCOMPLETE OR IMPROPERLY FORMATTED DATA - SUBMITTED INFORMATION IN THE WRONG OATS REPORTS; FAILED TO SUBMIT REPORTS WHEN REQUIRED AND SUBMITTED INCORRECT INFORMATION IN REPORTS.
Sanction detail — filed text
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF THE FINDINGS. FINE OF $10,000.00 PAID IN AUGUST 2008.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE No Information Filed This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY 2. Principal Sanction: Censure Other Sanctions: FINE 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 08/11/2008 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: 2006005296-01 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: Other Other Product Types: REPORTABLE SECURITIES 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): NASD RULES 6130, 6955(A) - SMH CAPITAL INC. SUBMITTED ERRONEOUS REPORTS TO THE NASDAQ MARKET CENTER (NMC) IN THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO REPORT TO THE NMC THE CORRECT SYMBOL INDICATING WHETHER IT EXECUTED TRANSACTIONS IN REPORTABLE SECURITIES AS PRINCIPAL, RISKLESS PRINCIPAL OR AGENT; AND THE CANCELLATION OF TRADES PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO THE NMC; AND REPORTED AN INCORRECT EXECUTION TIME TO THE NMC. THE FIRM TRANSMITTED TO THE ORDER AUDIT TRAIL SYSTEM (OATS) REPORTS THAT CONTAINED INACCURATE, INCOMPLETE OR IMPROPERLY FORMATTED DATA - SUBMITTED INFORMATION IN THE WRONG OATS REPORTS; FAILED TO SUBMIT REPORTS WHEN REQUIRED AND SUBMITTED INCORRECT INFORMATION IN REPORTS. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC) 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 08/11/2008 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 10,000.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: NONE Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF THE FINDINGS. FINE OF $10,000.00 PAID IN AUGUST 2008. 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). NASD RULES 6130, 6955(A) - FIRM SUBMITTED ERRONEOUS REPORTS TO THE NASDAQ MARKET CENTER (NMC) IN THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO REPORT TO THE NMC THE CORRECT SYMBOL INDICATING WHETHER IT EXECUTED TRANSACTIONS IN REPORTABLE SECURITIES AS PRINCIPAL, RISKLESS PRINCIPAL OR AGENT; AND THE CANCELLATION OF TRADES PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO THE NMC; AND REPORTED AN INCORRECT EXECUTION TIME TO THE NMC. THE FIRM TRANSMITTED TO THE ORDER AUDIT TRAIL SYSTEM (OATS) REPORTS THAT CONTAINED INACCURATE, INCOMPLETE OR IMPROPERLY FORMATTED DATA - SUBMITTED INFORMATION IN THE WRONG OATS REPORTS; FAILED TO SUBMIT REPORTS WHEN REQUIRED AND SUBMITTED INCORRECT INFORMATION IN REPORTS.
regulatory · block 6PDF pages 35–37
- Regulator name — filed text
- FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 5,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Action status / disposition — filed text
THE FIRM ENTERED INTO A LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT RELATING TO THE FAILURE TO REPORT TO TRACE 397 TRANSACTIONS IN TRACE-ELIGIBLE SECURITIES WITHIN 15 MINUTES OF THE TIME OF EXECUTION DURING THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2006
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
DURING THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2006, THE FIRM FAILED TO REPORT TO TRACE 397 TRANSACTIONS IN TRACE-ELIGIBLE SECURITIES WITHIN 15 MINUTES OF THE TIME OF EXECUTION.
Sanction detail — filed text
FINE PAID PRIOR TO OCTOBER 29, 2008.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE No Information Filed This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY 2. Principal Sanction: Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s) Other Sanctions: 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 10/14/2008 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: 2006005962101 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: Debt - Corporate Other Product Types: 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): DURING THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2006, THE FIRM FAILED TO REPORT TO TRACE 397 TRANSACTIONS IN TRACE-ELIGIBLE SECURITIES WITHIN 15 MINUTES OF THE TIME OF EXECUTION. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC) 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 10/14/2008 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 5,000.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: NONE Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: FINE PAID PRIOR TO OCTOBER 29, 2008. 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). THE FIRM ENTERED INTO A LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT RELATING TO THE FAILURE TO REPORT TO TRACE 397 TRANSACTIONS IN TRACE-ELIGIBLE SECURITIES WITHIN 15 MINUTES OF THE TIME OF EXECUTION DURING THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2006
Show 9 more source blocks
regulatory · block 7PDF pages 37–39
- Regulator name — filed text
- TEXAS STATE SECURITIES BOARD
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 30,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Order
Action status / disposition — filed text
THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE ENTRY OF THE ORDER & THE FINDINGS OF FACTS & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW RELATED TO THE FAILURE TO REQUIRE TWO AGENTS OF AN INDEPENDENT FINANCIAL ADVISOR ASSOCIATED WITH APPLICANT'S NETWORK TO OBTAIN REGISTRATION AND LICENSING EXAMS PRIOR TO PROVIDING INVESTMENT ADVISORY SERVICES IN TEXAS. THE FIRM FAILED TO ENFORCE A SYSTEM REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE WITH THE BOARD RULES AND THE TEXAS SECURITIES ACT INVOLVING INVESTMENT ADVISER AGENT REGISTRATION AND FAILED TO DISCLOSE ONE AGENT'S OUTSIDE BUSINESS ACTIVITY INVOLVING INVESTMENT ADVISORY SERVICES ON HIS FORM U4.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
THE APPLICANT FAILED TO REQUIRE TWO AGENTS OF AN INDEPENDENT FINANCIAL ADVISOR ASSOCIATED WITH APPLICANT'S NETWORK TO OBTAIN REGISTRATION AND LICENSING EXAMS PRIOR TO PROVIDING INVESTMENT ADVISORY SERVICES IN TEXAS. THE APPLICANT FAILED TO ENFORCE A SYSTEM REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE WITH THE BOARD RULES AND THE TEXAS SECURITIES ACT INVOLVING INVESTMENT ADVISER AGENT REGISTRATION AND FAILED TO DISCLOSE ONE AGENT'S OUTSIDE BUSINESS ACTIVITY INVOLVING INVESTMENT ADVISORY SERVICES ON HIS FORM U4.
Sanction detail — filed text
FINE PAID ON NOVEMBER 20, 2008
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE No Information Filed This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) TEXAS STATE SECURITIES BOARD 2. Principal Sanction: Reprimand Other Sanctions: ADMINSITARTIVE FINE 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 11/20/2008 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: IC08-CAF-20 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: Other Other Product Types: NONE 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): THE APPLICANT FAILED TO REQUIRE TWO AGENTS OF AN INDEPENDENT FINANCIAL ADVISOR ASSOCIATED WITH APPLICANT'S NETWORK TO OBTAIN REGISTRATION AND LICENSING EXAMS PRIOR TO PROVIDING INVESTMENT ADVISORY SERVICES IN TEXAS. THE APPLICANT FAILED TO ENFORCE A SYSTEM REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE WITH THE BOARD RULES AND THE TEXAS SECURITIES ACT INVOLVING INVESTMENT ADVISER AGENT REGISTRATION AND FAILED TO DISCLOSE ONE AGENT'S OUTSIDE BUSINESS ACTIVITY INVOLVING INVESTMENT ADVISORY SERVICES ON HIS FORM U4. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Order 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 11/20/2008 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 30,000.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: REPRIMAND Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: FINE PAID ON NOVEMBER 20, 2008 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE ENTRY OF THE ORDER & THE FINDINGS OF FACTS & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW RELATED TO THE FAILURE TO REQUIRE TWO AGENTS OF AN INDEPENDENT FINANCIAL ADVISOR ASSOCIATED WITH APPLICANT'S NETWORK TO OBTAIN REGISTRATION AND LICENSING EXAMS PRIOR TO PROVIDING INVESTMENT ADVISORY SERVICES IN TEXAS. THE FIRM FAILED TO ENFORCE A SYSTEM REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE WITH THE BOARD RULES AND THE TEXAS SECURITIES ACT INVOLVING INVESTMENT ADVISER AGENT REGISTRATION AND FAILED TO DISCLOSE ONE AGENT'S OUTSIDE BUSINESS ACTIVITY INVOLVING INVESTMENT ADVISORY SERVICES ON HIS FORM U4.
regulatory · block 8PDF pages 39–40
- Regulator name — filed text
- FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 65,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
NASD RULE 6955(A)- FIRM FAILED TO TRANSMIT REPORTABLE ORDER EVENTS TO THE ORDER AUDIT TRAIL SYSTEM OVER 849 BUSINESS DAYS.
Sanction detail — filed text
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS; THEREFORE, THE FIRM IS CENSURED AND FINED $65,000. FINE PAID VIA WIRE ON APRIL 22, 2009.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE No Information Filed This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY 2. Principal Sanction: Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s) Other Sanctions: CENSURE 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 04/06/2009 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: 20060060470-01 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: Equity - OTC Other Product Types: 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): NASD RULE 6955(A)- FIRM FAILED TO TRANSMIT REPORTABLE ORDER EVENTS TO THE ORDER AUDIT TRAIL SYSTEM OVER 849 BUSINESS DAYS. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC) 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 04/06/2009 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 65,000.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS; THEREFORE, THE FIRM IS CENSURED AND FINED $65,000. FINE PAID VIA WIRE ON APRIL 22, 2009. 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 9PDF pages 40–42
- Regulator name — filed text
- FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 7,500.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
NASD RULES 2110, 6230, 6230(A) - SMH CAPITAL, INC. FAILED TO REPORT TO THE TRADE REPORTING AND COMPLIANCE ENGINE (TRACE) 99 TRANSACTIONS IN TRACE-ELIGIBLE SECURITIES WITHIN 15 MINUTES OF THE TIME OF EXECUTION. THIS CONDUCT CONSTITUTES SEPARATE AND DISTINCT VIOLATIONS OF NASD RULE 6230(A) AND A PATTERN OR PRACTICE OF LATE REPORTING WITHOUT EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES IN VIOLATION OF NASD RULE 2110. THE FIRM REPORTED 8 TRANSACTIONS IN TRACE-ELIGIBLE SECURITIES TO TRACE THAT IT WAS NOT REQUIRED TO REPORT.
Sanction detail — filed text
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS; THEREFORE, THE FIRM IS CENSURED AND FINED $7,500. FINE PAID VIA CHECK ON OCTOBER 9, 2009.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE No Information Filed This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY 2. Principal Sanction: Censure Other Sanctions: FINE 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 09/28/2009 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: THE AWC WAS ACCEPTED BY FINRA ON SEPTEMBER 28, 2009, BUT THE FIRM WAS NOT PROVIDED A COPY UNTIL OCTOBER 7, 2009. 4. Docket/Case Number: 2008013609701 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: Other Other Product Types: TRACE-ELIGIBLE SECURITIES 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): NASD RULES 2110, 6230, 6230(A) - SMH CAPITAL, INC. FAILED TO REPORT TO THE TRADE REPORTING AND COMPLIANCE ENGINE (TRACE) 99 TRANSACTIONS IN TRACE-ELIGIBLE SECURITIES WITHIN 15 MINUTES OF THE TIME OF EXECUTION. THIS CONDUCT CONSTITUTES SEPARATE AND DISTINCT VIOLATIONS OF NASD RULE 6230(A) AND A PATTERN OR PRACTICE OF LATE REPORTING WITHOUT EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES IN VIOLATION OF NASD RULE 2110. THE FIRM REPORTED 8 TRANSACTIONS IN TRACE-ELIGIBLE SECURITIES TO TRACE THAT IT WAS NOT REQUIRED TO REPORT. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC) 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 09/28/2009 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: THE AWC WAS ACCEPTED BY FINRA ON SEPTEMBER 28, 2009, BUT THE FIRM WAS NOT PROVIDED A COPY UNTIL OCTOBER 7, 2009. 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 7,500.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS; THEREFORE, THE FIRM IS CENSURED AND FINED $7,500. FINE PAID VIA CHECK ON OCTOBER 9, 2009. 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 10PDF pages 42–44
- Regulator name — filed text
- FINRA
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 10,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Action status / disposition — filed text
DURING THE PERIOD APRIL 1, 2009 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2009, THE FIRM FAILED TO ACCURATELY REPORT THE EXECUTION TIMES FOR 137 TRANSACTIONS IN CORPORATE DEBT SECURITIES AND FAILED TO TIMELY REPORT ALL 137 TRANSACTIONS TO TRACE WITHIN 15 MINUTES OF EXECUTION. THE FIRM ALSO INACCURATELY REPORTED THE EXECUTION TIMES FOR 70 OF THE 137 TRANSACIOTNS IN ITS ORDER MEMORANDA.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 RULE 17A-3, FINRA RULES 3730(A), 6730(C)(8) - SMH CAPITAL INC. N/K/A SANDERS MORRIS HARRIS INC. FAILED TO ACCURATELY REPORT THE EXECUTION TIMES OF TRANSACTIONS IN CORPORATE DEBT SECURITIES AND FAILED TO TIMELY REPORT THE TRANSACTIONS IN TRADE REPORTING AND COMPLIANCE ENGINE (TRACE)-ELIGIBLE SECURITIES TO TRACE WITHIN 15 MINUTES OF EXECUTION. THE FIRM INACCURATELY REPORTED THE EXECUTION TIME FOR SOME OF THE TRANSACTIONS IN ITS ORDER MEMORANDA.
Sanction detail — filed text
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS; THE FIRM WAS CENSURED AND FINED $10,000. FINE PAID ON 04/05/2012.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE No Information Filed This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) FINRA 2. Principal Sanction: Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s) Other Sanctions: CENSURE 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 03/22/2012 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: 2009019368101 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: Debt - Corporate Other Product Types: TRACE-ELIGIBLE SECURITIES 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 RULE 17A-3, FINRA RULES 3730(A), 6730(C)(8) - SMH CAPITAL INC. N/K/A SANDERS MORRIS HARRIS INC. FAILED TO ACCURATELY REPORT THE EXECUTION TIMES OF TRANSACTIONS IN CORPORATE DEBT SECURITIES AND FAILED TO TIMELY REPORT THE TRANSACTIONS IN TRADE REPORTING AND COMPLIANCE ENGINE (TRACE)-ELIGIBLE SECURITIES TO TRACE WITHIN 15 MINUTES OF EXECUTION. THE FIRM INACCURATELY REPORTED THE EXECUTION TIME FOR SOME OF THE TRANSACTIONS IN ITS ORDER MEMORANDA. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC) 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 03/27/2012 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: DATE NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AWC RECEIVED BY THE FIRM. 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 10,000.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS; THE FIRM WAS CENSURED AND FINED $10,000. FINE PAID ON 04/05/2012. 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). DURING THE PERIOD APRIL 1, 2009 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2009, THE FIRM FAILED TO ACCURATELY REPORT THE EXECUTION TIMES FOR 137 TRANSACTIONS IN CORPORATE DEBT SECURITIES AND FAILED TO TIMELY REPORT ALL 137 TRANSACTIONS TO TRACE WITHIN 15 MINUTES OF EXECUTION. THE FIRM ALSO INACCURATELY REPORTED THE EXECUTION TIMES FOR 70 OF THE 137 TRANSACIOTNS IN ITS ORDER MEMORANDA.
regulatory · block 11PDF pages 44–46
- Regulator name — filed text
- FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 75,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Action status / disposition — filed text
A REVIEW OF 148 HEDGE FUND COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE PUBLIC DISTRIBUTED BY THE FIRM DURING THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 2008 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2008, REVEALED THAT NINE OF SUCH PIECES FAILED TO DISCLOSE RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH INVESTING IN HEDGE FUNDS, CONTAINED CHARTS AND GRAPHS THAT WERE UNCLEAR, OR MADE MISLEADING OR EXAGGERATED CLAIMS, PRESENTATIONS STATEMENTS OR DESCRIPTIONS. TWO OF SUCH PIECES WERE NOT APPROVED BY A PRINCIPAL PRIOR TO USE.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
FINRA RULE 2010, NASD RULES 2110, 2210 - REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES OF SANDERS MORRIS HARRIS, INC. DISTRIBUTED PIECES OF HEDGE FUND ADVERTISING MATERIAL TO RETAIL CUSTOMERS THAT FAILED TO DISCLOSE RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH INVESTING IN HEDGE FUNDS, CONTAINED CHARTS OR GRAPHS THAT WERE UNCLEAR AND OMITTED MATERIAL INFORMATION, CONTAINED MISLEADING STATEMENTS THAT WERE PROMISSORY OF POSITIVE FUTURE RETURNS, IMPLIED THAT NEGATIVE RETURNS COULD BE AVOIDED AND/OR IMPLIED THAT PAST PERFORMANCE IS INDICATIVE OF FUTURE POSITIVE RETURNS. THE FIRM DISTRIBUTED TWO OF THE SUBJECT ADVERTISING PIECES TO RETAIL CUSTOMERS WITHOUT PRINCIPAL REVIEW.
Sanction detail — filed text
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS; THEREFORE, THE FIRM IS CENSURED AND FINED $75,000. FINE PAID ON 7/19/2012.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE No Information Filed This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY 2. Principal Sanction: Censure Other Sanctions: 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 07/11/2012 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: 2009018184601 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: Other Other Product Types: HEDGE FUNDS 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): FINRA RULE 2010, NASD RULES 2110, 2210 - REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES OF SANDERS MORRIS HARRIS, INC. DISTRIBUTED PIECES OF HEDGE FUND ADVERTISING MATERIAL TO RETAIL CUSTOMERS THAT FAILED TO DISCLOSE RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH INVESTING IN HEDGE FUNDS, CONTAINED CHARTS OR GRAPHS THAT WERE UNCLEAR AND OMITTED MATERIAL INFORMATION, CONTAINED MISLEADING STATEMENTS THAT WERE PROMISSORY OF POSITIVE FUTURE RETURNS, IMPLIED THAT NEGATIVE RETURNS COULD BE AVOIDED AND/OR IMPLIED THAT PAST PERFORMANCE IS INDICATIVE OF FUTURE POSITIVE RETURNS. THE FIRM DISTRIBUTED TWO OF THE SUBJECT ADVERTISING PIECES TO RETAIL CUSTOMERS WITHOUT PRINCIPAL REVIEW. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC) 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 07/11/2012 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 75,000.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS; THEREFORE, THE FIRM IS CENSURED AND FINED $75,000. FINE PAID ON 7/19/2012. 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). A REVIEW OF 148 HEDGE FUND COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE PUBLIC DISTRIBUTED BY THE FIRM DURING THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 2008 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2008, REVEALED THAT NINE OF SUCH PIECES FAILED TO DISCLOSE RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH INVESTING IN HEDGE FUNDS, CONTAINED CHARTS AND GRAPHS THAT WERE UNCLEAR, OR MADE MISLEADING OR EXAGGERATED CLAIMS, PRESENTATIONS STATEMENTS OR DESCRIPTIONS. TWO OF SUCH PIECES WERE NOT APPROVED BY A PRINCIPAL PRIOR TO USE.
regulatory · block 12PDF pages 46–48
- Regulator name — filed text
- FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 150,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 15C3-1, 17A-3, 17A-11, FINRA RULES 2010, 2360, NASD RULES 2110, 2860, 3010, 3011(A), 3011(B), 3011(C), 3110, MSRB RULE G-41 - SANDERS MORRIS HARRIS INC., ACTING THROUGH TWO PRINCIPALS, FAILED TO REASONABLY SUPERVISE A REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVE. THE PRINCIPALS FAILED TO ADEQUATELY IMPLEMENT THE REPRESENTATIVE'S HEIGHTENED SUPERVISION PLAN, IN THAT THEY FAILED TO PRE-APPROVE LOW-PRICED EQUITY TRANSACTIONS EXECUTED BY HIM AND FAILED TO EVIDENCE THEY HAD CONTACTED HIS CUSTOMERS ON A QUARTERLY BASIS AS REQUIRED BY THE HEIGHTENED SUPERVISION PLAN. THE FIRM FAILED TO ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN A REASONABLE SUPERVISORY SYSTEM TO SUPERVISE THE OPTIONS TRADING EFFECTED BY ITS REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES AT A BRANCH OFFICE. THE FIRM ALLOWED ITS BRANCH OFFICE, AT WHICH MORE THAN THREE REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES WERE LOCATED, TO TRANSACT AN OPTIONS BUSINESS WHILE THE PRINCIPAL SUPERVISOR WAS NOT QUALIFIED AS EITHER A REGISTERED OPTIONS PRINCIPAL OR A LIMITED PRINCIPAL-GENERAL SECURITIES SALES SUPERVISOR. THE FIRM, ACTING THROUGH ITS ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING (AML)COMPLIANCE OFFICER (AMLCO), FAILED TO ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN AN ADEQUATE AML COMPLIANCE PROGRAM (AMLCP) TO DETECT AND IDENTIFY POTENTIAL RED FLAGS FOR SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY. THE FIRM MAINTAINED CLEARING AGREEMENTS WITH FOUR CLEARING PLATFORMS, BUT FAILED TO DOCUMENT ANY REVIEW OF EXCEPTION REPORTS TO DETECT AND IDENTIFY POTENTIAL RED FLAGS FOR SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY FROM THREE OF THE FOUR CLEARING PLATFORMS. THE FIRM'S AMLCP REVIEWS WERE FOCUSED ON THE ACTIVITY CONDUCTED THROUGH ONLY ONE CLEARING PLATFORM. THE FIRM'S AMLCO DID NOT HAVE ACCESS TO THE TRADING ACTIVITY OR EXCEPTION REPORTS TO REVIEW FOR SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY ACROSS THREE OUT OF FOUR TRADING PLATFORMS, AND DID NOT PERFORM ANY MANUAL REVIEW OF ACTIVITY OCCURRING IN THESE PLATFORMS, LEAVING APPROXIMATELY 40% OF THE FIRM'S BUSINESS THAT WAS NOT SUBJECT TO REVIEW. ACCORDINGLY, THE FIRM, ACTING THROUGH ITS AMLCO, DID NOT IMPLEMENT AN ADEQUATE SYSTEM TO REVIEW FOR SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY. THE FIRM, ACTING THROUGH ITS AMLCO, FAILED TO IMPLEMENT THE FIRM'S POLICIES AND PROCEDURES REGARDING DUE DILIGENCE FOR CORRESPONDENT ACCOUNTS FOR FOREIGN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS. THE FIRM'S PROCEDURES PROVIDED THAT CORRESPONDENT ACCOUNTS FOR FOREIGN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS WERE TO BE FORWARDED TO THE AMLCO FOR REVIEW UPON ACCOUNT OPENING. THE FIRM'S WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES (WSPS)STATED THAT THE AMLCO WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR IDENTIFYING CORRESPONDENT ACCOUNTS FOR FOREIGN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS AND CONDUCTING THE REQUIRED DUE DILIGENCE. THE FIRM HAD FAILED TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE DOCUMENTATION EVIDENCING THE IDENTIFICATION AND PERFORMANCE OF DUE DILIGENCE ON ITS FIVE CORRESPONDENT ACCOUNTS FOR FOREIGN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS. THE FIRM, ACTING THROUGH ITS AMLCO, FAILED TO CONDUCT AN ADEQUATE TESTING OF ITS AMLCP. THE TESTING FAILED TO INCLUDE REVIEWS FOR CUSTOMER IDENTIFICATION PROGRAM COMPLIANCE AND FAILED TO REVIEW THE ADEQUACY OF ITS SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY MONITORING PROGRAM; THE TEST RESULTS DID NOT EVEN INCLUDE A FINDING THAT IT FAILED TO MONITOR FOR SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY OR POTENTIAL RED FLAGS OF CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS HELD AT THREE OF ITS CLEARING PLATFORMS. THE FIRM FAILED TO FILE A REPORT OF FOREIGN BANK AND FINANCIAL ACCOUNTS FOR A CALENDAR YEAR AND FILED ITS REPORT FOR THE FOLLOWING YEAR AFTER THE DEADLINE FOR ITS ONE FOREIGN BANK ACCOUNT. FINRA CONVEYED TO THE FIRM THAT A PROPOSED CREDIT AGREEMENT BETWEEN A BANK AND THE FIRM'S PARENT COMPANY PLEDGED THE ASSETS OF ITS SUBSIDIARIES WHICH CAUSED A NET CAPITAL CHARGE TO THE FIRM AND IT SHOULD HAVE NOTED THE ENTIRE AMOUNT BORROWED AS A LIABILITY FOR CALCULATING ITS NET CAPITAL REQUIREMENT SO THAT IT DID NOT ACCURATELY CALCULATE AND REPORT ITS NET CAPITAL REQUIREMENT FOR MORE THAN 18 MONTHS. THE PARENT COMPANY ACTED TO ALLEVIATE THE FIRM OF THE FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AND INCREASE ITS NET CAPITAL POSITION AND BRING IT OUT OF NET CAPITAL DEFICIENCY AND BRING IT INTO COMPLIANCE.
Sanction detail — filed text
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS; THEREFORE, THE FIRM IS CENSURED AND FINED $150,000, $50,000 PERTAINS TO AN MSRB RULE VIOLATION, AND $25,000 IS JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY. FINE PAID ON 8/15/2012.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE No Information Filed This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY 2. Principal Sanction: Censure Other Sanctions: FINE 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 08/07/2012 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: 2008015360002 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: Options Other Product Types: EQUITIES 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 15C3-1, 17A-3, 17A-11, FINRA RULES 2010, 2360, NASD RULES 2110, 2860, 3010, 3011(A), 3011(B), 3011(C), 3110, MSRB RULE G-41 - SANDERS MORRIS HARRIS INC., ACTING THROUGH TWO PRINCIPALS, FAILED TO REASONABLY SUPERVISE A REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVE. THE PRINCIPALS FAILED TO ADEQUATELY IMPLEMENT THE REPRESENTATIVE'S HEIGHTENED SUPERVISION PLAN, IN THAT THEY FAILED TO PRE-APPROVE LOW-PRICED EQUITY TRANSACTIONS EXECUTED BY HIM AND FAILED TO EVIDENCE THEY HAD CONTACTED HIS CUSTOMERS ON A QUARTERLY BASIS AS REQUIRED BY THE HEIGHTENED SUPERVISION PLAN. THE FIRM FAILED TO ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN A REASONABLE SUPERVISORY SYSTEM TO SUPERVISE THE OPTIONS TRADING EFFECTED BY ITS REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES AT A BRANCH OFFICE. THE FIRM ALLOWED ITS BRANCH OFFICE, AT WHICH MORE THAN THREE REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES WERE LOCATED, TO TRANSACT AN OPTIONS BUSINESS WHILE THE PRINCIPAL SUPERVISOR WAS NOT QUALIFIED AS EITHER A REGISTERED OPTIONS PRINCIPAL OR A LIMITED PRINCIPAL-GENERAL SECURITIES SALES SUPERVISOR. THE FIRM, ACTING THROUGH ITS ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING (AML)COMPLIANCE OFFICER (AMLCO), FAILED TO ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN AN ADEQUATE AML COMPLIANCE PROGRAM (AMLCP) TO DETECT AND IDENTIFY POTENTIAL RED FLAGS FOR SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY. THE FIRM MAINTAINED CLEARING AGREEMENTS WITH FOUR CLEARING PLATFORMS, BUT FAILED TO DOCUMENT ANY REVIEW OF EXCEPTION REPORTS TO DETECT AND IDENTIFY POTENTIAL RED FLAGS FOR SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY FROM THREE OF THE FOUR CLEARING PLATFORMS. THE FIRM'S AMLCP REVIEWS WERE FOCUSED ON THE ACTIVITY CONDUCTED THROUGH ONLY ONE CLEARING PLATFORM. THE FIRM'S AMLCO DID NOT HAVE ACCESS TO THE TRADING ACTIVITY OR EXCEPTION REPORTS TO REVIEW FOR SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY ACROSS THREE OUT OF FOUR TRADING PLATFORMS, AND DID NOT PERFORM ANY MANUAL REVIEW OF ACTIVITY OCCURRING IN THESE PLATFORMS, LEAVING APPROXIMATELY 40% OF THE FIRM'S BUSINESS THAT WAS NOT SUBJECT TO REVIEW. ACCORDINGLY, THE FIRM, ACTING THROUGH ITS AMLCO, DID NOT IMPLEMENT AN ADEQUATE SYSTEM TO REVIEW FOR SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY. THE FIRM, ACTING THROUGH ITS AMLCO, FAILED TO IMPLEMENT THE FIRM'S POLICIES AND PROCEDURES REGARDING DUE DILIGENCE FOR CORRESPONDENT ACCOUNTS FOR FOREIGN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS. THE FIRM'S PROCEDURES PROVIDED THAT CORRESPONDENT ACCOUNTS FOR FOREIGN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS WERE TO BE FORWARDED TO THE AMLCO FOR REVIEW UPON ACCOUNT OPENING. THE FIRM'S WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES (WSPS)STATED THAT THE AMLCO WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR IDENTIFYING CORRESPONDENT ACCOUNTS FOR FOREIGN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS AND CONDUCTING THE REQUIRED DUE DILIGENCE. THE FIRM HAD FAILED TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE DOCUMENTATION EVIDENCING THE IDENTIFICATION AND PERFORMANCE OF DUE DILIGENCE ON ITS FIVE CORRESPONDENT ACCOUNTS FOR FOREIGN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS. THE FIRM, ACTING THROUGH ITS AMLCO, FAILED TO CONDUCT AN ADEQUATE TESTING OF ITS AMLCP. THE TESTING FAILED TO INCLUDE REVIEWS FOR CUSTOMER IDENTIFICATION PROGRAM COMPLIANCE AND FAILED TO REVIEW THE ADEQUACY OF ITS SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY MONITORING PROGRAM; THE TEST RESULTS DID NOT EVEN INCLUDE A FINDING THAT IT FAILED TO MONITOR FOR SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY OR POTENTIAL RED FLAGS OF CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS HELD AT THREE OF ITS CLEARING PLATFORMS. THE FIRM FAILED TO FILE A REPORT OF FOREIGN BANK AND FINANCIAL ACCOUNTS FOR A CALENDAR YEAR AND FILED ITS REPORT FOR THE FOLLOWING YEAR AFTER THE DEADLINE FOR ITS ONE FOREIGN BANK ACCOUNT. FINRA CONVEYED TO THE FIRM THAT A PROPOSED CREDIT AGREEMENT BETWEEN A BANK AND THE FIRM'S PARENT COMPANY PLEDGED THE ASSETS OF ITS SUBSIDIARIES WHICH CAUSED A NET CAPITAL CHARGE TO THE FIRM AND IT SHOULD HAVE NOTED THE ENTIRE AMOUNT BORROWED AS A LIABILITY FOR CALCULATING ITS NET CAPITAL REQUIREMENT SO THAT IT DID NOT ACCURATELY CALCULATE AND REPORT ITS NET CAPITAL REQUIREMENT FOR MORE THAN 18 MONTHS. THE PARENT COMPANY ACTED TO ALLEVIATE THE FIRM OF THE FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AND INCREASE ITS NET CAPITAL POSITION AND BRING IT OUT OF NET CAPITAL DEFICIENCY AND BRING IT INTO COMPLIANCE. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC) 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 08/07/2012 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 150,000.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS; THEREFORE, THE FIRM IS CENSURED AND FINED $150,000, $50,000 PERTAINS TO AN MSRB RULE VIOLATION, AND $25,000 IS JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY. FINE PAID ON 8/15/2012. 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 13PDF pages 48–50
- Regulator name — filed text
- FINRA
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 50,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
FINRA RULES 2010, 7450, NASD RULE 3010 - SANDERS MORRIS HARRIS INC. FAILED TO TRANSMIT REPORTABLE ORDER EVENTS (ROES) TO THE ORDER AUDIT TRAIL SYSTEM (OATS) ON NUMEROUS BUSINESS DAYS. THE FIRM'S SUPERVISORY SYSTEM FAILED TO DESIGNATE AN APPROPRIATELY REGISTERED PRINCIPAL(S) WITH AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT THE SUPERVISORY RESPONSIBILITIES WITH RESPECT TO OATS SUPERVISION. THE FIRM FAILED TO PROVIDE DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE THAT DURING THE REVIEW PERIOD IT PERFORMED THE SUPERVISORY REVIEWS SET FORTH IN ITS WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES CONCERNING OATS REPORTING.
Sanction detail — filed text
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS; THEREFORE, THE FIRM IS CENSURED, FINED $50,000 AND REQUIRED TO REVISE ITS WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES REGARDING OATS SUPERVISION AND OATS REPORTING WITHIN 30 BUSINESS DAYS OF ACCEPTANCE OF THIS AWC BY THE NAC. FINE PAID ON 01/08/2013.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE No Information Filed This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) FINRA 2. Principal Sanction: Other Sanctions: 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 12/21/2012 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: 2011027424701 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: No Product Other Product Types: 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): FINRA RULES 2010, 7450, NASD RULE 3010 - SANDERS MORRIS HARRIS INC. FAILED TO TRANSMIT REPORTABLE ORDER EVENTS (ROES) TO THE ORDER AUDIT TRAIL SYSTEM (OATS) ON NUMEROUS BUSINESS DAYS. THE FIRM'S SUPERVISORY SYSTEM FAILED TO DESIGNATE AN APPROPRIATELY REGISTERED PRINCIPAL(S) WITH AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT THE SUPERVISORY RESPONSIBILITIES WITH RESPECT TO OATS SUPERVISION. THE FIRM FAILED TO PROVIDE DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE THAT DURING THE REVIEW PERIOD IT PERFORMED THE SUPERVISORY REVIEWS SET FORTH IN ITS WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES CONCERNING OATS REPORTING. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC) 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 12/21/2012 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 50,000.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: UNDERTAKING Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS; THEREFORE, THE FIRM IS CENSURED, FINED $50,000 AND REQUIRED TO REVISE ITS WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES REGARDING OATS SUPERVISION AND OATS REPORTING WITHIN 30 BUSINESS DAYS OF ACCEPTANCE OF THIS AWC BY THE NAC. FINE PAID ON 01/08/2013. 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 14PDF pages 50–52
- Regulator name — filed text
- OFFICE OF THE MISSISSIPPI SECRETARY OF STATE SECURITIES DIVISION
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 25,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Order
Action status / disposition — filed text
IN CONNECTION WITH THE DIVISION'S INVESTIGATION, THE DIVISION ACKNOWLEDGED THE EXISTENCE OF MITIGATING FACTORS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS THAT WERE IMPLEMENTED BY THE FIRM IN 2009-2010 AND THAT THE FIRM UNCONDITIONALLY TENDERED TO THE ESTATE OF THE CUSTOMER THE SUM OF $75,000.00 AS PARTIAL REIMBURSEMENT OF THE LOSSES ON THE SUBJECT INVESTMENTS. THE DIVISION CONCLUDED THAT THE FIRM, ACTING THROUGH THE RR, VIOLATED RULE 521(A)(3) IN CONNECTION WITH THE ALLEGEDLY UNSUITABLE RECOMMENDATIONS, AND FURTHER CONCLUDED THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO REASONABLY SUPERVISE THE RR BY ALLOWING THE CUSTOMER TO PURCHASE AND HOLD THE ALLEGEDLY UNSUITABLE INVESTMENTS. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING ANY OF THE FINDINGS OF FACT, ALLEGATIONS, ASSERTIONS OR CONCLUSIONS, ON MARCH 19, 2014, THE FIRM AGREED TO THE DIVISION'S ENTRY OF AN ADMININSTRATIVE ORDER, AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY OF $25,000.00, AND AGREED TO REIMBURSE THE DIVISION'S COST OF INVESTIGATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $10,000.00.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
THE SECRETARY OF STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ISSUED A NOTICE OF INTENT TO IMPOSE ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTIES AND TO SUSPEND THE FIRM'S REGISTRATION ALLEGING THAT A FORMER REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE FIRM VIOLATED RULE 523(3) IN 2003 WHEN HE MADE A RECOMMENDATION TO A 90-YEAR OLD CLIENT TO PURCHASE A PROMISSORY NOTE AND AGAIN IN 2004 WHEN HE RECOMMENDED SHE CONVERT THE PROMISSORY NOTE TO PREFERRED STOCK. THE STATE FURTHER ALLEGED THAT THE FIRM UNREASONABLY VALUED THE INVESTMENT ON THE CLIENT'S ACCOUNT STATEMENT AND FAILED TO EFFECTIVELY SUPERVISE THE REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVE TO PREVENT THE SALE OF UNSUITABLE PRODUCTS AS ALLEGED.
Sanction detail — filed text
A CHECK DATED 04/03/2014 IN THE AMOUNT OF $35,000.00 WAS SUBMITTED IN PAYMENT OF A $25,000.00 ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY AND $10,000.00 TO REIMBURSE THE COSTS OF THE STATE'S INVESTIGATION.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE No Information Filed This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) OFFICE OF THE MISSISSIPPI SECRETARY OF STATE SECURITIES DIVISION 2. Principal Sanction: Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s) Other Sanctions: SUSPENSION 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 07/03/2013 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: RECEIVED WRITTEN NOTICE FROM MISSISSIPPI SECRETARY OF STATE ON 07/18/2013. 4. Docket/Case Number: S-11-0167 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock) Other Product Types: PROMISSORY NOTE 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): THE SECRETARY OF STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ISSUED A NOTICE OF INTENT TO IMPOSE ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTIES AND TO SUSPEND THE FIRM'S REGISTRATION ALLEGING THAT A FORMER REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE FIRM VIOLATED RULE 523(3) IN 2003 WHEN HE MADE A RECOMMENDATION TO A 90-YEAR OLD CLIENT TO PURCHASE A PROMISSORY NOTE AND AGAIN IN 2004 WHEN HE RECOMMENDED SHE CONVERT THE PROMISSORY NOTE TO PREFERRED STOCK. THE STATE FURTHER ALLEGED THAT THE FIRM UNREASONABLY VALUED THE INVESTMENT ON THE CLIENT'S ACCOUNT STATEMENT AND FAILED TO EFFECTIVELY SUPERVISE THE REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVE TO PREVENT THE SALE OF UNSUITABLE PRODUCTS AS ALLEGED. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Order 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 03/24/2014 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 25,000.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS AND EXPENSES INCURRED IN THE INVESTIGATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $10,000.00 Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: A CHECK DATED 04/03/2014 IN THE AMOUNT OF $35,000.00 WAS SUBMITTED IN PAYMENT OF A $25,000.00 ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY AND $10,000.00 TO REIMBURSE THE COSTS OF THE STATE'S INVESTIGATION. 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). IN CONNECTION WITH THE DIVISION'S INVESTIGATION, THE DIVISION ACKNOWLEDGED THE EXISTENCE OF MITIGATING FACTORS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS THAT WERE IMPLEMENTED BY THE FIRM IN 2009-2010 AND THAT THE FIRM UNCONDITIONALLY TENDERED TO THE ESTATE OF THE CUSTOMER THE SUM OF $75,000.00 AS PARTIAL REIMBURSEMENT OF THE LOSSES ON THE SUBJECT INVESTMENTS. THE DIVISION CONCLUDED THAT THE FIRM, ACTING THROUGH THE RR, VIOLATED RULE 521(A)(3) IN CONNECTION WITH THE ALLEGEDLY UNSUITABLE RECOMMENDATIONS, AND FURTHER CONCLUDED THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO REASONABLY SUPERVISE THE RR BY ALLOWING THE CUSTOMER TO PURCHASE AND HOLD THE ALLEGEDLY UNSUITABLE INVESTMENTS. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING ANY OF THE FINDINGS OF FACT, ALLEGATIONS, ASSERTIONS OR CONCLUSIONS, ON MARCH 19, 2014, THE FIRM AGREED TO THE DIVISION'S ENTRY OF AN ADMININSTRATIVE ORDER, AGREED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY OF $25,000.00, AND AGREED TO REIMBURSE THE DIVISION'S COST OF INVESTIGATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $10,000.00.
regulatory · block 15PDF pages 52–54
- Regulator name — filed text
- FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 85,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Action status / disposition — filed text
ON DECEMBER 28, 2012, AS A RESULT OF AN INACCURATE DEFERRED TAX BALANCE CALCULATION, THE FIRM INACCURATELY CALCULATED ITS EXCESS NET CAPITAL. BASED ON THIS INACCURATE NET CAPITAL CALCULATION, ON DECEMBER 28, 2012, THE FIRM'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS AUTHORIZED A DISTRIBUTION TO ITS OWNERS. IN CONNECTION WITH THE APPROVED DISTRIBUTION, THE FIRM FILED WITH FINRA A NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF EQUITY CAPITAL INDICATING THE WITHDRAWAL WOULD OCCUR ON JANUARY 2, 2013. THE FIRM HOWEVER FAILED TO PROPERLY ACCRUE THIS CAPITAL DISTRIBUTION AS A LIABILITY ON DECEMBER 28, 2012. INSTEAD, THE FIRM WAITED AND REFLECTED THE EXPENSE WHEN THE DISTRIBUTION OCCURRED ON JANUARY 4, 2013. SMH LATER PROVIDED FINRA WITH AN ESTIMATED NET CAPITAL COMPUTATION AS OF JANUARY 4, 2013 BASED ON END OF 2012 AUDITED FINANCIALS THAT REFLECTED THE CORRECT VALUE FOR THE DEFERRED TAX ASSET AND THE DISTRIBUTION. THE REVISED CALCULATION REFLECTED A NET CAPITAL DEFICIENCY FOR THE FIRM THAT REMAINED IN EFFECT UNTIL FEBRUARY 28, 2013. ADDITIONALLY, FROM OCTOBER 1, 2012 THROUGH FEBRUARY 28, 2013, THE FIRM FAILED TO MAINTAIN ACCURATE BOOKS AND RECORDS TO PROPERLY REFLECT THE BOOK BASIS AMOUNTS FOR PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS SOLD IN OCTOBER 2012. CONSEQUENTLY, THE FIRM FILED INACCURATE FOCUS FILINGS FOR PERIODS ENDING OCTOBER 31, 2012, NOVEMBER 30, 2012, DECEMBER 31, 2012, JANUARY 31, 2013, AND FEBRUARY 28, 2013.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
ON DECEMBER 28, 2012, AS A RESULT OF AN INACCURATE DEFERRED TAX BALANCE CALCULATION, THE FIRM INACCURATELY CALCULATED ITS EXCESS NET CAPITAL. BASED ON THIS INACCURATE NET CAPITAL CALCULATION, ON DECEMBER 28, 2012, THE FIRM'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS AUTHORIZED A DISTRIBUTION TO ITS OWNERS. IN CONNECTION WITH THE APPROVED DISTRIBUTION, THE FIRM FILED WITH FINRA A NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF EQUITY CAPITAL INDICATING THE WITHDRAWAL WOULD OCCUR ON JANUARY 2, 2013. THE FIRM HOWEVER FAILED TO PROPERLY ACCRUE THIS CAPITAL DISTRIBUTION AS A LIABILITY ON DECEMBER 28, 2012. INSTEAD, THE FIRM WAITED AND REFLECTED THE EXPENSE WHEN THE DISTRIBUTION OCCURRED ON JANUARY 4, 2013. SMH LATER PROVIDED FINRA WITH AN ESTIMATED NET CAPITAL COMPUTATION AS OF JANUARY 4, 2013 BASED ON END OF 2012 AUDITED FINANCIALS THAT REFLECTED THE CORRECT VALUE FOR THE DEFERRED TAX ASSET AND THE DISTRIBUTION. THE REVISED CALCULATION REFLECTED A NET CAPITAL DEFICIENCY FOR THE FIRM THAT REMAINED IN EFFECT UNTIL FEBRUARY 28, 2013. ADDITIONALLY, FROM OCTOBER 1, 2012 THROUGH FEBRUARY 28, 2013, THE FIRM FAILED TO MAINTAIN ACCURATE BOOKS AND RECORDS TO PROPERLY REFLECT THE BOOK BASIS AMOUNTS FOR PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS SOLD IN OCTOBER 2012. CONSEQUENTLY, THE FIRM FILED INACCURATE FOCUS FILINGS FOR PERIODS ENDING OCTOBER 31, 2012, NOVEMBER 30, 2012, DECEMBER 31, 2012, JANUARY 31, 2013, AND FEBRUARY 28, 2013.
Sanction detail — filed text
TOTAL AMOUNT OF FINE $ 85,000.00. PAYMENT RELASE DATE 01/06/2015.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE No Information Filed This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY 2. Principal Sanction: Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s) Other Sanctions: 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 12/31/2014 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: 2013036468301 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: Other Other Product Types: 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): ON DECEMBER 28, 2012, AS A RESULT OF AN INACCURATE DEFERRED TAX BALANCE CALCULATION, THE FIRM INACCURATELY CALCULATED ITS EXCESS NET CAPITAL. BASED ON THIS INACCURATE NET CAPITAL CALCULATION, ON DECEMBER 28, 2012, THE FIRM'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS AUTHORIZED A DISTRIBUTION TO ITS OWNERS. IN CONNECTION WITH THE APPROVED DISTRIBUTION, THE FIRM FILED WITH FINRA A NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF EQUITY CAPITAL INDICATING THE WITHDRAWAL WOULD OCCUR ON JANUARY 2, 2013. THE FIRM HOWEVER FAILED TO PROPERLY ACCRUE THIS CAPITAL DISTRIBUTION AS A LIABILITY ON DECEMBER 28, 2012. INSTEAD, THE FIRM WAITED AND REFLECTED THE EXPENSE WHEN THE DISTRIBUTION OCCURRED ON JANUARY 4, 2013. SMH LATER PROVIDED FINRA WITH AN ESTIMATED NET CAPITAL COMPUTATION AS OF JANUARY 4, 2013 BASED ON END OF 2012 AUDITED FINANCIALS THAT REFLECTED THE CORRECT VALUE FOR THE DEFERRED TAX ASSET AND THE DISTRIBUTION. THE REVISED CALCULATION REFLECTED A NET CAPITAL DEFICIENCY FOR THE FIRM THAT REMAINED IN EFFECT UNTIL FEBRUARY 28, 2013. ADDITIONALLY, FROM OCTOBER 1, 2012 THROUGH FEBRUARY 28, 2013, THE FIRM FAILED TO MAINTAIN ACCURATE BOOKS AND RECORDS TO PROPERLY REFLECT THE BOOK BASIS AMOUNTS FOR PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS SOLD IN OCTOBER 2012. CONSEQUENTLY, THE FIRM FILED INACCURATE FOCUS FILINGS FOR PERIODS ENDING OCTOBER 31, 2012, NOVEMBER 30, 2012, DECEMBER 31, 2012, JANUARY 31, 2013, AND FEBRUARY 28, 2013. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC) 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 01/02/2015 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 85,000.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: N/A Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: TOTAL AMOUNT OF FINE $ 85,000.00. PAYMENT RELASE DATE 01/06/2015. 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). ON DECEMBER 28, 2012, AS A RESULT OF AN INACCURATE DEFERRED TAX BALANCE CALCULATION, THE FIRM INACCURATELY CALCULATED ITS EXCESS NET CAPITAL. BASED ON THIS INACCURATE NET CAPITAL CALCULATION, ON DECEMBER 28, 2012, THE FIRM'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS AUTHORIZED A DISTRIBUTION TO ITS OWNERS. IN CONNECTION WITH THE APPROVED DISTRIBUTION, THE FIRM FILED WITH FINRA A NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF EQUITY CAPITAL INDICATING THE WITHDRAWAL WOULD OCCUR ON JANUARY 2, 2013. THE FIRM HOWEVER FAILED TO PROPERLY ACCRUE THIS CAPITAL DISTRIBUTION AS A LIABILITY ON DECEMBER 28, 2012. INSTEAD, THE FIRM WAITED AND REFLECTED THE EXPENSE WHEN THE DISTRIBUTION OCCURRED ON JANUARY 4, 2013. SMH LATER PROVIDED FINRA WITH AN ESTIMATED NET CAPITAL COMPUTATION AS OF JANUARY 4, 2013 BASED ON END OF 2012 AUDITED FINANCIALS THAT REFLECTED THE CORRECT VALUE FOR THE DEFERRED TAX ASSET AND THE DISTRIBUTION. THE REVISED CALCULATION REFLECTED A NET CAPITAL DEFICIENCY FOR THE FIRM THAT REMAINED IN EFFECT UNTIL FEBRUARY 28, 2013. ADDITIONALLY, FROM OCTOBER 1, 2012 THROUGH FEBRUARY 28, 2013, THE FIRM FAILED TO MAINTAIN ACCURATE BOOKS AND RECORDS TO PROPERLY REFLECT THE BOOK BASIS AMOUNTS FOR PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS SOLD IN OCTOBER 2012. CONSEQUENTLY, THE FIRM FILED INACCURATE FOCUS FILINGS FOR PERIODS ENDING OCTOBER 31, 2012, NOVEMBER 30, 2012, DECEMBER 31, 2012, JANUARY 31, 2013, AND FEBRUARY 28, 2013.
* Metrics are based on the latest available data, including Form ADV filings, brochures, and relationship summaries pulled from the SEC IAPD, and may be subject to change. Learn what is included in the Rialytix data. Please refer to the firm's official disclosures for the most accurate information using their CRD number. This is not investment advice.