Firm profile

Valueact Capital Management, L.P.

SAN FRANCISCO, CACRD 154249Registration Status: ApprovedEffective since August 2, 2010SEC # 801-71658Latest ADV March 30, 2026

Valueact Capital Management, L.P. is an SEC registered investment adviser organized as a limited partnership with a primary office location in San Francisco, CA. Its latest Form ADV filing, dated March 30, 2026, reports $11.3B in regulatory assets under management, 31 employees, 2 offices, and 18 accounts.

Assets Under Management
$11.3B
Employees
31
Offices
2 offices
Total Clients
18

Associated firm names

1 name listed
  • VALUEACT CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P.

Leadership

6 roles identified
CEODavid R. Hale
CEOGarrison M. Morfit
CCOSonia M. Muscatine

Advisory services offered

1 types reported
Portfolio management for pooled investment vehicles

Fee models offered

2 types reported
Asset based fees
Performance-based fees

Offices & Contact

Primary office

SAN FRANCISCO, California, United States

Loading map…

Primary office regionOther reported regions

Shading shows states and countries with reported offices. Cities are listed below; shading does not indicate service coverage.

California

SAN FRANCISCOPrimary office · SANTA BARBARA

2 office records listed · 2 total offices reported. Counts can use different reporting dates. SEC filers may list only their largest 25 additional offices.

Contact and digital presence

ADV profile links

Regulatory Assets Under Management Breakdown

Total regulatory assets under management$11.3Bas of March 30, 2026
Discretionary100.0%
$11.3B
100% of total RAUM100.0%
Non-discretionary0.0%
$0
0% of total RAUM0.0%
All regulatory assets under management are discretionary.

Client Coverage Demographics

Top client segmentPooled Investment Vehicles represent 100.0% of total clients.
Top client categories% of clientsClients
1
Pooled Investment Vehicles
100.0%
18

Assets under management Growth by Quarter

Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.

Total AUM$11.3B
Total Accounts18
10Y AUM Change$-6.3B (-35.8%)

Private Funds

Private funds reported by Valueact Capital Management, L.P.

Loading private fund disclosures…

Employee Growth by Quarter

Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.

Total Employees31
Clients per Employee1:1
10Y Employee Change-3 (-8.8%)

Historical AUM and employee figures reflect available SEC Form ADV filings under this CRD. Filing gaps may reflect registration status changes, dormant periods, state registration periods, firm restructuring, or other reporting changes. Rialytix does not interpolate missing periods.


Ownership

Ownership information is not yet available for this profile.

Compliance & Disclosures

Filing dated 3/30/2026 6:45:28 PM

Responses were selected by the RIA in its filing. Questions are shortened for readability; “you” refers to the reporting firm, and some questions also cover advisory affiliates.

RIA or supervised-person involvementThe RIA reported that one or more events below involve the firm or its supervised persons.RIA responseYes
AFelonies2 No

In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:

  • A1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a felony?No
  • A2Been charged with a felony?No
BMisdemeanors2 No

In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:

  • B1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a misdemeanor involving investments, an investment-related business, fraud, false statements or omissions, wrongful taking of property, bribery, perjury, forgery, counterfeiting, or extortion?No
  • B2Been charged with a misdemeanor of the kind listed above?No
CSEC or CFTC actions5 No

Has the SEC or CFTC ever:

  • C1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
  • C2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated SEC or CFTC regulations or statutes?No
  • C3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
  • C4Entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
  • C5Imposed a civil money penalty on you or an advisory affiliate, or ordered you or an advisory affiliate to cease and desist from any activity?No
DOther regulatory actions5 No

Has any other federal regulatory agency, state regulatory agency, or foreign financial regulatory authority ever:

  • D1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission, or was dishonest, unfair, or unethical?No
  • D2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related regulations or statutes?No
  • D3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
  • D4In the past ten years, entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
  • D5Denied, suspended, or revoked your or an advisory affiliate’s registration or license, or otherwise prevented association with an investment-related business or restricted activities?No
ESelf-regulatory organization actions4 No

Has a self-regulatory organization or commodities exchange ever:

  • E1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
  • E2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated its rules, other than a violation designated as a minor rule violation under an SEC-approved plan?No
  • E3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
  • E4Disciplined you or an advisory affiliate by expulsion, suspension, barring association with other members, or otherwise restricting activities?No
FProfessional authorizations1 No
  • FHas an authorization to act as an attorney, accountant, or federal contractor granted to you or an advisory affiliate ever been revoked or suspended?No
GPending regulatory proceedings1 No
  • GAre you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a regulatory proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of C, D, or E?No
HCivil judicial actions and proceedings1 Yes3 No

(1) Court actions

Has a domestic or foreign court:

  • H(1)(a)In the past ten years, enjoined you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?Yes
  • H(1)(b)Found that you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related statutes or regulations?No
  • H(1)(c)Dismissed, pursuant to a settlement agreement, an investment-related civil action brought against you or an advisory affiliate by a state or foreign financial regulatory authority?No

(2) Pending civil proceedings

  • H(2)Are you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a civil proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of H(1)?No
Additional DRP filings 1 source block

Verbatim excerpts from supporting DRP filings, which may concern the firm or advisory affiliates. Amounts retain their filed labels; no total or attribution is inferred.

civil judicial · block 1PDF pages 73–75
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Item 11.H. of Part
1A or Item 2.F. of Part 1B of Form ADV.
Civil Judicial
Check Part 1A item(s) being responded to:
11.H(1)(a)
11.H(1)(b)
11.H(1)(c)
11.H(2)
Check Part 1B item(s) being responded to:
2.F(1)
2.F(2)
2.F(3)
2.F(4)
2.F(5)
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page.
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Item 11.H. of Part 1A or Item 2.F. of Part 1B. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. Unrelated civil judicial actions must be reported on separate DRPs.

PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
VA PARTNERS I, LLC
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
VALUEACT CAPITAL MASTER
FUND, L.P.
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
VALUEACT CO-INVEST
INTERNATIONAL, L.P.
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.H.
(1)(a), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Court Action initiated by: (Name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, SRO, commodities exchange, agency, firm, private plaintiff, etc.) 
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (THE "DOJ")
2.
Principal Relief Sought:
Civil Penalty(ies)/Fine(s)
Other Relief Sought: 
ON NOVEMBER 1, 2016, THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION, ENTERED A
FINAL JUDGMENT ("FINAL JUDGMENT"), TO WHICH THE PARTIES HAD CONSENTED, THAT SPECIFIES CIRCUMSTANCES WHEN VA PARTNERS I, LLC,
VALUEACT CAPITAL MASTER FUND, L.P., AND VALUEACT CO-INVEST INTERNATIONAL, L.P. (COLLECTIVELY, "VAC") MUST FILE A NOTIFICATION UNDER
THE HART-SCOTT-RODINO ANTITRUST IMPROVEMENTS ACT OF 1976 ("HSR ACT"), REQUIRES VAC TO MAINTAIN AN HSR ACT COMPLIANCE PROGRAM
AND DESIGNATE A COMPLIANCE OFFICER TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FINAL JUDGMENT.
3.
Filing Date of Court Action (MM/DD/YYYY):

04/04/2016
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
5.
Formal Action was brought in (include name of Federal, State or Foreign Court, Location of Court - City or County and State or Country, Docket/Case
Number): 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION CASE NUMBER 4:16-CV-01672-DMR
6.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the civil judicial action (if applicable): 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this civil action (your response must fit within the space provided): 
THE DOJ ALLEGED THAT VAC VIOLATED THE NOTICE AND WAITING PERIOD REQUIREMENTS OF THE HSR ACT WITH RESPECT TO THE FUNDS'
INVESTMENTS IN TWO PUBLICLY-TRADED COMPANIES, AND THAT VAC WAS NOT ELIGIBLE TO USE THE RELIED-UPON EXEMPTION TO THE
NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR THOSE ACQUISITIONS MADE "SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF INVESTMENT" UNDER 15 U.S.C. § 18A(C)(9).
8.
Current Status? 
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, action appealed to (provide name of court) and Date Appeal Filed (MM/DD/YYYY): 
10. If pending, date notice/process was served (MM/DD/YYYY):
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
NO LONGER PENDING - FINAL JUDGMENT ENTERED ON NOVEMBER 1, 2016.
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 14 only.
11. How was matter resolved:
Settled
12. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 
11/01/2016
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
13. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered or Relief Granted(check appropriate items)?
Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 11,000,000.00
Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
Disgorgement/Restitution
Censure
Cease and Desist/Injunction
Bar
Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions:
THE FINAL JUDGMENT SPECIFIES CIRCUMSTANCES WHEN VAC MUST FILE A NOTIFICATION UNDER THE HSR ACT, REQUIRES VAC TO MAINTAIN AN
HSR ACT COMPLIANCE PROGRAM AND DESIGNATE A COMPLIANCE OFFICER TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FINAL JUDGMENT.
C.
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement, or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived:
VAC'S GENERAL PARTNER, ON BEHALF OF THE FUNDS, PAID A MONETARY CIVIL PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $11,000,000 ON NOVEMBER 23,
2016 AND AGREED TO COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF THE FINAL JUDGMENT, AS DESCRIBED IN SECTION 13(B) ABOVE, DURING THE TEN YEARS
STARTING ON NOVEMBER 1, 2016.
14. Provide a brief summary of circumstances related to the action(s), allegation(s), disposition(s) and/or finding(s) disclosed above (your response must
fit within the space provided). 
IN APRIL 2016, THE DOJ ALLEGED THAT VAC VIOLATED THE NOTICE AND WAITING PERIOD REQUIREMENTS OF THE HSR ACT WITH RESPECT TO VAC'S
INVESTMENTS IN TWO PUBLICLY-TRADED COMPANIES, AND THAT VAC WAS NOT ELIGIBLE TO USE THE RELIED-UPON EXEMPTION TO THE
NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR THOSE ACQUISITIONS MADE "SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF INVESTMENT" UNDER 15 U.S.C. § 18A(C)(9). VAC
DENIED ANY WRONGDOING, AND CONSENTED TO A FINAL JUDGMENT, ENTERED BY THE COURT ON NOVEMBER 1, 2016, WITHOUT ADMISSION OF FACT
OR LAW. AS PART OF THE SETTLEMENT, THE GENERAL PARTNER, ON BEHALF OF THE FUNDS, PAID AN $11 MILLION PENALTY AND THE FINAL JUDGMENT
SPECIFIED INTER ALIA WHEN THE FUNDS MUST FILE A NOTIFICATION UNDER THE HSR ACT DURING THE TEN YEARS STARTING ON NOVEMBER 1, 2016.
IN VAC'S JUDGMENT, THE FINAL JUDGMENT DOES NOT PLACE VAC UNDER ANY MATERIAL LIMITATIONS IN ITS PRESENT OR FUTURE INVESTMENT
ACTIVITIES.

* Metrics are based on the latest available data, including Form ADV filings, brochures, and relationship summaries pulled from the SEC IAPD, and may be subject to change. Learn what is included in the Rialytix data. Please refer to the firm's official disclosures for the most accurate information using their CRD number. This is not investment advice.