Firm profile

Dmk Advisor Group, Inc..

LUTZ, FLCRD 41067Registration Status: ApprovedEffective since June 3, 2021SEC # 801-121389Latest ADV October 2, 2026

Dmk Advisor Group, Inc. is an SEC registered investment adviser organized as a corporation with a primary office location in Lutz, FL. Its latest Form ADV filing, dated September 14, 2026, reports $131M in regulatory assets under management, 38 employees, 2 offices, and 779 accounts.

Assets Under Management
$131M
Employees
38
Offices
2 offices
Total Clients
515

Associated firm names

2 names listed
  • DMK ADVISOR GROUP, INC.
  • STEPHEN A. KOHN & ASSOCIATES, LTD.

Leadership

2 roles identified
CEOHarold Alan Schwartz
CCOErin Elaine Baskett

Advisory services offered

2 types reported
Financial Planning Services
Portfolio management for individuals and small businesses

Fee models offered

2 types reported
Asset based fees
Fixed fees

Offices & Contact

Primary office

LUTZ, Florida, United States

Loading map…

Primary office regionOther reported regions

Shading shows states and countries with reported offices. Cities are listed below; shading does not indicate service coverage.

Florida

LUTZPrimary office

Oregon

TIGARD

2 office records listed · 2 total offices reported. Counts can use different reporting dates. SEC filers may list only their largest 25 additional offices.

Contact and digital presence

ADV profile links

Regulatory Assets Under Management Breakdown

Total regulatory assets under management$131Mas of October 2, 2026
Discretionary100.0%
$131M
100% of total RAUM100.0%
Non-discretionary0.0%
$0
0% of total RAUM0.0%
All regulatory assets under management are discretionary.

Client Coverage Demographics

Top client segmentIndividuals represent 80.0% of total clients.
Top client categories% of clientsClients
1
Individuals
80.0%
412
2
HNWI
20.0%
103

Assets under management Growth by Quarter

Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.

Total AUM$131M
Total Accounts779
10Y AUM Change+$53M (+67.1%)

Private Funds

Private funds reported by Dmk Advisor Group, Inc..

Loading private fund disclosures…

Employee Growth by Quarter

Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.

Total Employees38
Clients per Employee14:1
10Y Employee Change-10 (-20.8%)

Historical AUM and employee figures reflect available SEC Form ADV filings under this CRD. Filing gaps may reflect registration status changes, dormant periods, state registration periods, firm restructuring, or other reporting changes. Rialytix does not interpolate missing periods.

Current profile metrics reflect a newer SEC ADV filing than the latest point shown in the historical chart. The chart will update once that filing is added to the ADV history dataset.


Ownership

Reported direct and indirect ownership ranges

Each range applies to a separate reported relationship and should not be added together.

Reported ownership ranges

Highlighted bands show the percentage range reported in Form ADV.

0%25%50%75%100%
HAROLD ALAN SCHWARTZDirect owner · Schedule AInterest in DMK ADVISOR GROUP, INC.
10% to < 25%
JORGE RAMON PEREZDirect owner · Schedule AInterest in DMK ADVISOR GROUP, INC.
10% to < 25%
JANAK R DESAIDirect owner · Schedule AInterest in DMK ADVISOR GROUP, INC.
10% to < 25%
SUNIL DUTT MISRADirect owner · Schedule AInterest in DMK ADVISOR GROUP, INC.
10% to < 25%
KELVIN RAY DOUGLASDirect owner · Schedule AInterest in DMK ADVISOR GROUP, INC.
10% to < 25%

Bars represent the reported range at that individual ownership step, not an estimated percentage of the advisory firm. Indirect relationships may refer to intermediate entities rather than directly to Dmk Advisor Group, Inc...

No indirect ownership information reported in the source’s Schedule B.

Reported ownership and control details

Form ADV · Filing date 2026-10-02 · Schedules A and B

10 entries
#Owner / person & roleInterest in entityReported interestControl personTitle / status acquiredSource
1PETER B GALLIGANFINOPIndividualDMK ADVISOR GROUP, INC.Less than 5%Code NANoFINOP12/2001Schedule APDF page 19
2HAROLD ALAN SCHWARTZCEO/PRINCIPALIndividualDMK ADVISOR GROUP, INC.10% to less than 25%Code BNoCEO/PRINCIPAL10/2020Schedule APDF page 19
3JOHN DAVID OHMANROP/CROPIndividualDMK ADVISOR GROUP, INC.Less than 5%Code NANoROP/CROP10/2019Schedule APDF page 19
4JORGE RAMON PEREZDIRECTORIndividualDMK ADVISOR GROUP, INC.10% to less than 25%Code BNoDIRECTOR01/2020Schedule APDF page 19
5JANAK R DESAIDIRECTORIndividualDMK ADVISOR GROUP, INC.10% to less than 25%Code BYesDIRECTOR01/2020Schedule APDF page 19
6SUNIL DUTT MISRADIRECTOR/PRINCIPALIndividualDMK ADVISOR GROUP, INC.10% to less than 25%Code BYesDIRECTOR/PRINCIPAL01/2020Schedule APDF page 19
7KELVIN RAY DOUGLASDIRECTORIndividualDMK ADVISOR GROUP, INC.10% to less than 25%Code BYesDIRECTOR01/2020Schedule APDF page 19
8ERIN ELAINE BASKETTCHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICERIndividualDMK ADVISOR GROUP, INC.Less than 5%Code NANoCHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER06/2022Schedule APDF page 19
9BARRY JULIAN GROSMANDIRECTORIndividualDMK ADVISOR GROUP, INC.Less than 5%Code NANoDIRECTOR08/2024Schedule APDF page 19
10STEPHEN ALAN KOHNMUNI PRINCIPALIndividualDMK ADVISOR GROUP, INC.Less than 5%Code NANoMUNI PRINCIPAL05/2025Schedule APDF page 19

Less than 5% may include zero. Code F identifies a role without specifying a percentage. Reported interests may overlap and may not include every owner. Total indirect ownership is not calculated.

Compliance & Disclosures

Filing dated 9/14/2026 12:57:44 PM

Responses were selected by the RIA in its filing. Questions are shortened for readability; “you” refers to the reporting firm, and some questions also cover advisory affiliates.

RIA or supervised-person involvementThe RIA reported that none of the events below involve the firm or its supervised persons.RIA responseNo
AFelonies2 No

In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:

  • A1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a felony?No
  • A2Been charged with a felony?No
BMisdemeanors2 No

In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:

  • B1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a misdemeanor involving investments, an investment-related business, fraud, false statements or omissions, wrongful taking of property, bribery, perjury, forgery, counterfeiting, or extortion?No
  • B2Been charged with a misdemeanor of the kind listed above?No
CSEC or CFTC actions5 No

Has the SEC or CFTC ever:

  • C1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
  • C2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated SEC or CFTC regulations or statutes?No
  • C3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
  • C4Entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
  • C5Imposed a civil money penalty on you or an advisory affiliate, or ordered you or an advisory affiliate to cease and desist from any activity?No
DOther regulatory actions5 No

Has any other federal regulatory agency, state regulatory agency, or foreign financial regulatory authority ever:

  • D1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission, or was dishonest, unfair, or unethical?No
  • D2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related regulations or statutes?No
  • D3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
  • D4In the past ten years, entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
  • D5Denied, suspended, or revoked your or an advisory affiliate’s registration or license, or otherwise prevented association with an investment-related business or restricted activities?No
ESelf-regulatory organization actions1 Yes3 No

Has a self-regulatory organization or commodities exchange ever:

  • E1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
  • E2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated its rules, other than a violation designated as a minor rule violation under an SEC-approved plan?Yes
  • E3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
  • E4Disciplined you or an advisory affiliate by expulsion, suspension, barring association with other members, or otherwise restricting activities?No
FProfessional authorizations1 No
  • FHas an authorization to act as an attorney, accountant, or federal contractor granted to you or an advisory affiliate ever been revoked or suspended?No
GPending regulatory proceedings1 No
  • GAre you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a regulatory proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of C, D, or E?No
HCivil judicial actions and proceedings4 No

(1) Court actions

Has a domestic or foreign court:

  • H(1)(a)In the past ten years, enjoined you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
  • H(1)(b)Found that you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related statutes or regulations?No
  • H(1)(c)Dismissed, pursuant to a settlement agreement, an investment-related civil action brought against you or an advisory affiliate by a state or foreign financial regulatory authority?No

(2) Pending civil proceedings

  • H(2)Are you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a civil proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of H(1)?No
Additional DRP filings 6 source blocks

Verbatim excerpts from supporting DRP filings, which may concern the firm or advisory affiliates. Amounts retain their filed labels; no total or attribution is inferred.

regulatory · block 1STEPHEN A. KOHN & ASSOCIATES, LTD.PDF pages 20–21
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
STEPHEN A. KOHN & ASSOCIATES, LTD.
Regulator name — filed text
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITY DEALERS
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 8,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)

Action status / disposition — filed text

RESPONDENT HAS IMPLEMENTED A WRITTEN ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING PROGRAM REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE AND MONITOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE BANK SECRECY ACT AND THE REGULATIONS PROMULGATED THEREUNDER. ANY REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES FAILING TO COMPLETE THE FIRM ELEMENT CONTINUING EDUCATION WILL BE EITHER FINED OR SUSPENDED, OR BOTH, UNTIL THAT REGULATORY REQUIREMENT IS FULFILLED.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

NASD RULES 1120, 2110, 3011, MSRB RULE G-41 - RESPONDENT MEMBER FAILED TO IMPLEMENT A WRITTEN ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING PROGRAM REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE AND MONITOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE BANK SECRECY ACT AND THE REGULATIONS PROMULGATED THEREUNDER. THE FINDING STATED THAT A NUMBER OF THE FIRM'S REGISTERED PERSONS REQUIRED TO PARTICIPATE IN THE FIRM ELEMENT CONTINUING EDUCATION FAILED TO DO SO.

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, STEPHEN A. KOHN & ASSOCIATES, LTD. CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS, THEREFORE, THE FIRM IS CENSURED AND FINED $8,000.00.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
41067
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
STEPHEN A. KOHN &
ASSOCIATES, LTD.
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITY DEALERS

2.
Principal Sanction:
Other
Other Sanctions: 
ADMINISTRATIVE
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
06/19/2006
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
E3A2005005001
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
NASD RULES 1120, 2110, 3011, MSRB RULE G-41 - RESPONDENT MEMBER FAILED TO IMPLEMENT A WRITTEN ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING PROGRAM
REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE AND MONITOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE BANK SECRECY ACT AND THE REGULATIONS
PROMULGATED THEREUNDER. THE FINDING STATED THAT A NUMBER OF THE FIRM'S REGISTERED PERSONS REQUIRED TO PARTICIPATE IN THE FIRM
ELEMENT CONTINUING EDUCATION FAILED TO DO SO.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
06/19/2006
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 8,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, STEPHEN A. KOHN & ASSOCIATES, LTD. CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO
THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS, THEREFORE, THE FIRM IS CENSURED AND FINED $8,000.00.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
RESPONDENT HAS IMPLEMENTED A WRITTEN ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING PROGRAM REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE AND MONITOR COMPLIANCE
WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE BANK SECRECY ACT AND THE REGULATIONS PROMULGATED THEREUNDER. ANY REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES
FAILING TO COMPLETE THE FIRM ELEMENT CONTINUING EDUCATION WILL BE EITHER FINED OR SUSPENDED, OR BOTH, UNTIL THAT REGULATORY
REQUIREMENT IS FULFILLED.
regulatory · block 2PDF pages 21–23
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):

6.
Principal Product Type:
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 3PDF pages 23–25
Regulator name — filed text
NASD, INC.
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 8,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)

Action status / disposition — filed text

RESPONDENT HAS IMPLEMENTED A WRITTEN ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING PROGRAM REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE AND MONITOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE BANK SECRECY ACT AND THE REGULATIONS PROMULGATED THEREUNDER. ANY REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES FAILING TO COMPLETE THE FIRM ELEMENT CONTINUING EDUCATION WILL BE EITHER FINED OR SUSPENDED, OR BOTH, UNTIL THAT REGULATORY REQUIREMENT IS FULFILLED.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

NASD RULES 1120, 2110, 3011, MSRB RULE G-41 - RESPONDENT MEMBER FAILED TO IMPLEMENT A WRITTEN ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING PROGRAM REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE AND MONITOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE BANK SECRECY ACT AND THE REGULATIONS PROMULGATED THEREUNDER. THE FINDING STATED THAT A NUMBER OF THE FIRM'S REGISTERED PERSONS REQUIRED TO PARTICIPATE IN THE FIRM ELEMENT CONTINUING EDUCATION FAILED TO DO SO.

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, STEPHEN A. KOHN & ASSOCIATES, LTD. CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS, THEREFORE, THE FIRM IS CENSURED AND FINED $8,000.00.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 

If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
NASD, INC.
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other
Other Sanctions: 
ADMINISTRATIVE
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
06/19/2006
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
E3A2005005001
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
NASD RULES 1120, 2110, 3011, MSRB RULE G-41 - RESPONDENT MEMBER FAILED TO IMPLEMENT A WRITTEN ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING PROGRAM
REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE AND MONITOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE BANK SECRECY ACT AND THE REGULATIONS
PROMULGATED THEREUNDER. THE FINDING STATED THAT A NUMBER OF THE FIRM'S REGISTERED PERSONS REQUIRED TO PARTICIPATE IN THE FIRM
ELEMENT CONTINUING EDUCATION FAILED TO DO SO.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
06/19/2006
 Exact
 Explanation

If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 8,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, STEPHEN A. KOHN & ASSOCIATES, LTD. CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO
THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS, THEREFORE, THE FIRM IS CENSURED AND FINED $8,000.00.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
RESPONDENT HAS IMPLEMENTED A WRITTEN ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING PROGRAM REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE AND MONITOR COMPLIANCE
WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE BANK SECRECY ACT AND THE REGULATIONS PROMULGATED THEREUNDER. ANY REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES
FAILING TO COMPLETE THE FIRM ELEMENT CONTINUING EDUCATION WILL BE EITHER FINED OR SUSPENDED, OR BOTH, UNTIL THAT REGULATORY
REQUIREMENT IS FULFILLED.
regulatory · block 4PDF pages 25–27
Regulator name — filed text
FINRA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 15,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE FIRM IS OF THE OPINION THAT THERE WAS NO RULE 2010 VIOLATION SINCE THERE WAS NO "VIOLATION" COMMITTED AGAINST ANY MEMBER OR CUSTOMER OF THE FIRM. FINRA CHARGED THE FIRM WITH AN MSRB RULE VIOLATION WHICH RESULTED FROM A CUSTOMER TRANSFERRING AN ACCOUNT TO THE FIRM THAT INCLUDED MUNICIPAL BOND POSITIONS. CUSTOMER REQUESTED LIQUIDATION OF THESE POSITIONS (FIRM IS AN MSRB MEMBER). THE MSRB PORTION OF THE LEVIED FINE AMOUNTS TO $7,500.00. THE FIRM MISUNDERSTOOD FINRA AML RULES CONCERNING WHO MAY CONDUCT THE ANNUAL AML EXAMINATION IN THAT ONLY A COMPLIANCE PRINCIPAL COULD CONDUCT THE AML EXAMINATION IF NO OTHER EXPERIENCED INDIVIDUAL IS EMPLOYED BY THE FIRM. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE FIRM DID NOT VIOLATE FEDERAL AML STATUTES.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

FINRA RULES 2010, 3010(C), 3310(C), NASD RULES 2110,3011(C), MSRB RULES G-27(D), G-41 - STEPHEN A. KOHN & ASSOCIATES' PRESIDENT AND CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER (CCO) CONDUCTED WHAT WAS PURPORTED TO BE A TEST OF THE FIRM'S ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING (AML) COMPLIANCE PROCEDURES AND THE PREPARATION AND EXECUTION OF AN ATTESTATION MEMORIALIZING HIS DETERMINATION THAT THEY WERE REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE AND MONITOR THE FIRM'S ONGOING COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE BANK SECRECY ACT (BSA) AND IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS. THE CCO CONDUCTED A "SELF-TEST" CONTRARY TO THE FIRM'S WRITTEN AML PROCEDURES THAT REQUIRED AN ANNUAL TEST BY AN OUTSIDE CONSULTING COMPANY. IN ADDITION TO NOT BEING INDEPENDENT, THE TEST WAS INADEQUATE BECAUSE IT WAS NOT A TEST AS CONTEMPLATED BY FINRA RULE 3310 IN THAT THE CCO DID NOTHING MORE THAN REVIEW THE AML PROCEDURES AND DEEM THEM REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE. HE DID NOT SEEK TO DETERMINE WHETHER FIRM PERSONNEL IMPLEMENTED THE PROCEDURES AND DID NOT REVIEW CUSTOMER ACCOUNT DOCUMENTATION, SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS, MONEY MOVEMENTS OR OTHER BUSINESS-RELATED ACTIVITY TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE AML PROCEDURES AS IMPLEMENTED RESULTED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE BSA. THE OUTSIDE CONSULTING COMPANY CONDUCTED A COMPLIANCE TEST AND CONDUCTED AN OVERVIEW OF THE "SELF-TEST". THE COMPANY'S OVERVIEW DID NOT CAUSE THE "SELF-TEST" TO BECOME EITHER INDEPENDENT OR ADEQUATE AND DID NOT REMEDIATE THE ALLEGED VIOLATION. THE FIRM'S SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES MANUAL PROVIDED THAT THE FIRM WOULD REVIEW EACH OFFICE OF SUPERVISORY JURISDICTION (OSJ) ANNUALLY AND THAT EACH BRANCH WOULD BE SUBJECT TO A PHYSICAL INSPECTION ONCE EVERY THREE YEARS AND THAT ALL OTHER NON-BRANCH LOCATIONS WOULD BE INSPECTED ONCE EVERY FIVE YEARS. THE FIRM DID NOT CONDUCT AN INSPECTION OR REVIEW OF ITS OSJ FOR TWO YEARS, FAILED TO INSPECT TWO NON-SUPERVISORY BRANCH OFFICES FOR APPROXIMATELY THREE YEARS AND FAILED TO INSPECT FIVE NON-BRANCH OFFICES FOR TWO YEARS PER THE FIRM'S OWN SCHEDULE.

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS; THEREFORE, THE FIRM IS CENSURED AND FINED $15,000, $7,500 OF WHICH IS FOR MSRB RULE VIOLATIONS.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL 
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
O
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.

This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FINRA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
11/20/2012
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
2011025501701
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
FINRA RULES 2010, 3010(C), 3310(C), NASD RULES 2110,3011(C), MSRB RULES G-27(D), G-41 - STEPHEN A. KOHN & ASSOCIATES' PRESIDENT AND
CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER (CCO) CONDUCTED WHAT WAS PURPORTED TO BE A TEST OF THE FIRM'S ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING (AML) COMPLIANCE
PROCEDURES AND THE PREPARATION AND EXECUTION OF AN ATTESTATION MEMORIALIZING HIS DETERMINATION THAT THEY WERE REASONABLY
DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE AND MONITOR THE FIRM'S ONGOING COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE BANK SECRECY ACT (BSA) AND
IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS. THE CCO CONDUCTED A "SELF-TEST" CONTRARY TO THE FIRM'S WRITTEN AML PROCEDURES THAT REQUIRED AN
ANNUAL TEST BY AN OUTSIDE CONSULTING COMPANY. IN ADDITION TO NOT BEING INDEPENDENT, THE TEST WAS INADEQUATE BECAUSE IT WAS NOT
A TEST AS CONTEMPLATED BY FINRA RULE 3310 IN THAT THE CCO DID NOTHING MORE THAN REVIEW THE AML PROCEDURES AND DEEM THEM
REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE. HE DID NOT SEEK TO DETERMINE WHETHER FIRM PERSONNEL IMPLEMENTED THE PROCEDURES
AND DID NOT REVIEW CUSTOMER ACCOUNT DOCUMENTATION, SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS, MONEY MOVEMENTS OR OTHER BUSINESS-RELATED
ACTIVITY TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE AML PROCEDURES AS IMPLEMENTED RESULTED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE BSA. THE OUTSIDE CONSULTING
COMPANY CONDUCTED A COMPLIANCE TEST AND CONDUCTED AN OVERVIEW OF THE "SELF-TEST". THE COMPANY'S OVERVIEW DID NOT CAUSE THE
"SELF-TEST" TO BECOME EITHER INDEPENDENT OR ADEQUATE AND DID NOT REMEDIATE THE ALLEGED VIOLATION. THE FIRM'S SUPERVISORY
PROCEDURES MANUAL PROVIDED THAT THE FIRM WOULD REVIEW EACH OFFICE OF SUPERVISORY JURISDICTION (OSJ) ANNUALLY AND THAT EACH
BRANCH WOULD BE SUBJECT TO A PHYSICAL INSPECTION ONCE EVERY THREE YEARS AND THAT ALL OTHER NON-BRANCH LOCATIONS WOULD BE
INSPECTED ONCE EVERY FIVE YEARS. THE FIRM DID NOT CONDUCT AN INSPECTION OR REVIEW OF ITS OSJ FOR TWO YEARS, FAILED TO INSPECT TWO
NON-SUPERVISORY BRANCH OFFICES FOR APPROXIMATELY THREE YEARS AND FAILED TO INSPECT FIVE NON-BRANCH OFFICES FOR TWO YEARS PER
THE FIRM'S OWN SCHEDULE.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
11/20/2012
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:

12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 15,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS;
THEREFORE, THE FIRM IS CENSURED AND FINED $15,000, $7,500 OF WHICH IS FOR MSRB RULE VIOLATIONS.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE FIRM IS OF THE OPINION THAT THERE WAS NO RULE 2010 VIOLATION SINCE THERE WAS NO "VIOLATION" COMMITTED AGAINST ANY MEMBER OR
CUSTOMER OF THE FIRM. FINRA CHARGED THE FIRM WITH AN MSRB RULE VIOLATION WHICH RESULTED FROM A CUSTOMER TRANSFERRING AN
ACCOUNT TO THE FIRM THAT INCLUDED MUNICIPAL BOND POSITIONS. CUSTOMER REQUESTED LIQUIDATION OF THESE POSITIONS (FIRM IS AN MSRB
MEMBER). THE MSRB PORTION OF THE LEVIED FINE AMOUNTS TO $7,500.00. THE FIRM MISUNDERSTOOD FINRA AML RULES CONCERNING WHO MAY
CONDUCT THE ANNUAL AML EXAMINATION IN THAT ONLY A COMPLIANCE PRINCIPAL COULD CONDUCT THE AML EXAMINATION IF NO OTHER
EXPERIENCED INDIVIDUAL IS EMPLOYED BY THE FIRM. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE FIRM DID NOT VIOLATE FEDERAL AML STATUTES.
regulatory · block 5PDF pages 27–29
Regulator name — filed text
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITY DEALERS, INC.
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 1,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

VIOLATION NASD RULE 2110 - FAILED TO MAINTAIN NET CAPITAL AS REQUIRED UNDER SEC RULE 15C-3-1

Sanction detail — filed text

$1,000.00 FINE WAS PAID 08/03/98
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.

This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITY DEALERS, INC.
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other
Other Sanctions: 
ADMINISTRATIVE
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
09/01/1997
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
FALL, 1997
4.
Docket/Case Number:
C3A980030
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
VIOLATION NASD RULE 2110 - FAILED TO MAINTAIN NET CAPITAL AS REQUIRED UNDER SEC RULE 15C-3-1
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
07/09/1998
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 1,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion

of penalty was waived: 
$1,000.00 FINE WAS PAID 08/03/98
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 6PDF pages 29–30
Regulator name — filed text
FINRA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 35,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE FIRM HAS RESOLVED ALL ISSUES NOTED WITHIN
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

THE FIRM FAILED TO HAVE A SUPERVISORY SYSTEM, INCLUDING WSPS, REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE WITH IT'S FORM CRS OBLIGATIONS, AND THE FIRM FAILED TO TIMELY DELIVER FORM CRS TO CERTAIN CUSTOMERS. THE FIRM FAILED TO HAVE A SUPERVISORY SYSTEM, INCLUDING WSPS, REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATION BEST INTEREST.

Sanction detail — filed text

FIRM WAS CENSURED AND FINED 35,000
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FINRA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Censure
Other Sanctions: 

CENSURE AND $35,000 FINE
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
05/17/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
2021069380201
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
FORM CRS
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE FIRM FAILED TO HAVE A SUPERVISORY SYSTEM, INCLUDING WSPS, REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE WITH IT'S FORM CRS
OBLIGATIONS, AND THE FIRM FAILED TO TIMELY DELIVER FORM CRS TO CERTAIN CUSTOMERS. THE FIRM FAILED TO HAVE A SUPERVISORY SYSTEM,
INCLUDING WSPS, REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATION BEST INTEREST.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
05/18/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 35,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
N/A
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
FIRM WAS CENSURED AND FINED 35,000
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE FIRM HAS RESOLVED ALL ISSUES NOTED WITHIN

* Metrics are based on the latest available data, including Form ADV filings, brochures, and relationship summaries pulled from the SEC IAPD, and may be subject to change. Learn what is included in the Rialytix data. Please refer to the firm's official disclosures for the most accurate information using their CRD number. This is not investment advice.