Assets under management Growth by Quarter
Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.
Private Funds
Private funds reported by Summit Financial, LLC
Employee Growth by Quarter
Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.
Historical AUM and employee figures reflect available SEC Form ADV filings under this CRD. Filing gaps may reflect registration status changes, dormant periods, state registration periods, firm restructuring, or other reporting changes. Rialytix does not interpolate missing periods.
Ownership
Reported direct and indirect ownership ranges
Reported ownership ranges
Highlighted bands show the percentage range reported in Form ADV.
Bars represent the reported range at that individual ownership step, not an estimated percentage of the advisory firm. Indirect relationships may refer to intermediate entities rather than directly to Summit Financial, LLC.
Reported ownership and control details
Form ADV · Filing date 2026-09-03 · Schedules A and B
| # | Owner / person & role | Interest in entity | Reported interest | Control person | Title / status acquired | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUMMIT FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, LLCOWNERDomestic entity | SUMMIT FINANCIAL, LLC | 75% or moreCode E | Yes | OWNER10/2018 | Schedule APDF page 109 |
| 2 | Steven WeinmanPRESIDENT, DIRECTORIndividual | SUMMIT FINANCIAL, LLC | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | PRESIDENT, DIRECTOR10/2018 | Schedule APDF page 109 |
| 3 | MICHAEL COLLIN BREMERCHIEF OPERATIONS OFFICERIndividual | SUMMIT FINANCIAL, LLC | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | CHIEF OPERATIONS OFFICER11/2018 | Schedule APDF page 109 |
| 4 | MARA DEBORAH STEMPLERCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERIndividual | SUMMIT FINANCIAL, LLC | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER11/2018 | Schedule APDF page 109 |
| 5 | STANLEY GREGORCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND DIRECTORIndividual | SUMMIT FINANCIAL, LLC | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND DIRECTOR10/2018 | Schedule APDF page 109 |
| 6 | ESMAT BAHAR HAWKESWORTHCHIEF LEGAL OFFICER,, DIRECTORIndividual | SUMMIT FINANCIAL, LLC | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | CHIEF LEGAL OFFICER,, DIRECTOR04/2019 | Schedule APDF page 109 |
| 7 | ANTHONY LAWRENCE MCELYNNCHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICERIndividual | SUMMIT FINANCIAL, LLC | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER05/2024 | Schedule APDF page 109 |
| 8 | MERCHANT WEALTH MANAGEMENT HOLDINGS 3, LLCMEMBERDomestic entity | SUMMIT FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, LLC | 50% to less than 75%Code D | Yes | MEMBER11/2024 | Schedule BPDF page 110 |
| 9 | STANLEY GREGORMEMBERIndividual | SUMMIT FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, LLC | 25% to less than 50%Code C | Yes | MEMBER11/2024 | Schedule BPDF page 110 |
| 10 | MERCHANT WEALTH PARTNERS, LLCMEMBERDomestic entity | MERCHANT WEALTH MANAGEMENT HOLDINGS 3, LLC | 75% or moreCode E | Yes | MEMBER11/2024 | Schedule BPDF page 110 |
| 11 | MWP ADVISORY, LLCMANAGERDomestic entity | MERCHANT WEALTH PARTNERS, LLC | Percentage not specifiedCode F | Yes | MANAGER07/2020 | Schedule BPDF page 110 |
| 12 | MERCHANT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLCMEMBERDomestic entity | MWP ADVISORY, LLC | 75% or moreCode E | Yes | MEMBER07/2020 | Schedule BPDF page 110 |
| 13 | MERCHANT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT HOLDINGS, LLCOWNERDomestic entity | MERCHANT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC | 75% or moreCode E | Yes | OWNER06/2017 | Schedule BPDF page 110 |
Less than 5% may include zero. Code F identifies a role without specifying a percentage. Reported interests may overlap and may not include every owner. Total indirect ownership is not calculated.
Compliance & Disclosures
Filing dated 9/3/2026 5:17:12 PM
Responses were selected by the RIA in its filing. Questions are shortened for readability; “you” refers to the reporting firm, and some questions also cover advisory affiliates.
AFelonies2 No
In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:
- A1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a felony?No
- A2Been charged with a felony?No
BMisdemeanors2 No
In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:
- B1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a misdemeanor involving investments, an investment-related business, fraud, false statements or omissions, wrongful taking of property, bribery, perjury, forgery, counterfeiting, or extortion?No
- B2Been charged with a misdemeanor of the kind listed above?No
CSEC or CFTC actions5 No
Has the SEC or CFTC ever:
- C1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
- C2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated SEC or CFTC regulations or statutes?No
- C3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- C4Entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
- C5Imposed a civil money penalty on you or an advisory affiliate, or ordered you or an advisory affiliate to cease and desist from any activity?No
DOther regulatory actions2 Yes3 No
Has any other federal regulatory agency, state regulatory agency, or foreign financial regulatory authority ever:
- D1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission, or was dishonest, unfair, or unethical?No
- D2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related regulations or statutes?Yes
- D3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- D4In the past ten years, entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?Yes
- D5Denied, suspended, or revoked your or an advisory affiliate’s registration or license, or otherwise prevented association with an investment-related business or restricted activities?No
ESelf-regulatory organization actions1 Yes3 No
Has a self-regulatory organization or commodities exchange ever:
- E1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
- E2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated its rules, other than a violation designated as a minor rule violation under an SEC-approved plan?Yes
- E3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- E4Disciplined you or an advisory affiliate by expulsion, suspension, barring association with other members, or otherwise restricting activities?No
FProfessional authorizations1 No
- FHas an authorization to act as an attorney, accountant, or federal contractor granted to you or an advisory affiliate ever been revoked or suspended?No
GPending regulatory proceedings1 No
- GAre you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a regulatory proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of C, D, or E?No
HCivil judicial actions and proceedings4 No
(1) Court actions
Has a domestic or foreign court:
- H(1)(a)In the past ten years, enjoined you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
- H(1)(b)Found that you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related statutes or regulations?No
- H(1)(c)Dismissed, pursuant to a settlement agreement, an investment-related civil action brought against you or an advisory affiliate by a state or foreign financial regulatory authority?No
(2) Pending civil proceedings
- H(2)Are you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a civil proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of H(1)?No
Additional DRP filings 2 source blocks
Verbatim excerpts from supporting DRP filings, which may concern the firm or advisory affiliates. Amounts retain their filed labels; no total or attribution is inferred.
regulatory · block 1SUMMIT EQUITIES INCPDF pages 110–112
- Advisory affiliate name — filed text
- SUMMIT EQUITIES INC
- Regulator name — filed text
- FINRA
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 325,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Action status / disposition — filed text
SUMMIT HAS SIGNIFICANTLY EXPANDED AND ENHANCED ITS MANAGEMENT, COMPLIANCE, SUPERVISORY AND LEGAL PERSONNEL AS WELL AS ITS OVERALL COMPLIANCE AND SUPERVISORY STRUCTURES AND TRAINING PROGRAMS. NOTWITHSTANDING THIS AWC'S FINDINGS THAT THE FIRM'S SUPERVISION AND TRAINING REGARDING VA SHARE CLASSES WAS INADEQUATE, WHICH SUMMIT DOES NOT DISPUTE, SUMMIT BELIEVES THAT THE RRS DID MAKE APPROPRIATE SUITABILITY DETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE SHARE CLASSES THEY RECOMMENDED TO THEIR VA CLIENTS. FURTHER, SUMMIT EQUITIES NO LONGER PERMITS RRS TO ASSOCIATE WITH ANY BROKERAGE FIRM OTHER THAN SUMMIT.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS THAT IT FAILED TO REASONABLY SUPERVISE ITS REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES' RECOMMENDATIONS OF MULTI-SHARE CLASS VARIABLE ANNUITIES (VAS) TO CUSTOMERS AND FAILED TO ESTABLISH, MAINTAIN, AND ENFORCE A REASONABLE SUPERVISORY SYSTEM AND PROCEDURES RELATED TO THE SALE AND SUITABILITY OF SUCH SECURITIES, INCLUDING SALES OF L-SHARE CONTRACTS. THE FINDINGS ALSO STATE THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO PROVIDE TRAINING TO ITS REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES AND PRINCIPALS ON THE SALE AND SUPERVISION OF MULTI-SHARE CLASS VAS AND THE SALE OF LONG-TERM INCOME RIDERS WITH MULTI-SHARE CLASS VAS. THE FIRM DID NOT PROVIDE TRAINING OR GUIDANCE TO REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES ON THE FEATURES OF VARIOUS SHARE CLASSES AND THE ASSOCIATED FEES AND SURRENDER CHARGES, AND DID NOT PROVIDE THEM WITH ADEQUATE INFORMATION TO COMPARE SHARE CLASSES TO MAKE SUITABILITY DETERMINATIONS. THE FINDINGS ALSO STATED THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO REASONABLY SUPERVISE THE PRIVATE SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS OF A REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVE. THE FIRM ALLOWED THE REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVE TO FORM A SEPARATE BROKER-DEALER. THE FIRM FAILED TO ADEQUATELY SUPERVISE THE REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVE'S ACTIVITIES THROUGH THE SEPARATE BROKER- DEALER AND FAILED TO ENSURE THAT HE COMPLIED WITH RESTRICTIONS IMPOSED BY THE FIRM. IN ADDITION, THE FIRM FAILED TO DETECT SEVERAL RED FLAGS THAT SHOULD HAVE ALERTED IT TO THE REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVE'S ACTIVITY.
Sanction detail — filed text
THE FIRM WAS CENSURED AND FINED $325,000.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE CRD Number: 11039 This advisory affiliate is a Firm an Individual Registered: Yes No Name: SUMMIT EQUITIES INC (For individuals, Last, First, Middle) This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) FINRA 2. Principal Sanction: Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s) Other Sanctions: CENSURE 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 05/01/2017 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: 2015043159201 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: Annuity(ies) - Variable Other Product Types: 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS THAT IT FAILED TO REASONABLY SUPERVISE ITS REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES' RECOMMENDATIONS OF MULTI-SHARE CLASS VARIABLE ANNUITIES (VAS) TO CUSTOMERS AND FAILED TO ESTABLISH, MAINTAIN, AND ENFORCE A REASONABLE SUPERVISORY SYSTEM AND PROCEDURES RELATED TO THE SALE AND SUITABILITY OF SUCH SECURITIES, INCLUDING SALES OF L-SHARE CONTRACTS. THE FINDINGS ALSO STATE THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO PROVIDE TRAINING TO ITS REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES AND PRINCIPALS ON THE SALE AND SUPERVISION OF MULTI-SHARE CLASS VAS AND THE SALE OF LONG-TERM INCOME RIDERS WITH MULTI-SHARE CLASS VAS. THE FIRM DID NOT PROVIDE TRAINING OR GUIDANCE TO REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES ON THE FEATURES OF VARIOUS SHARE CLASSES AND THE ASSOCIATED FEES AND SURRENDER CHARGES, AND DID NOT PROVIDE THEM WITH ADEQUATE INFORMATION TO COMPARE SHARE CLASSES TO MAKE SUITABILITY DETERMINATIONS. THE FINDINGS ALSO STATED THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO REASONABLY SUPERVISE THE PRIVATE SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS OF A REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVE. THE FIRM ALLOWED THE REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVE TO FORM A SEPARATE BROKER-DEALER. THE FIRM FAILED TO ADEQUATELY SUPERVISE THE REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVE'S ACTIVITIES THROUGH THE SEPARATE BROKER- DEALER AND FAILED TO ENSURE THAT HE COMPLIED WITH RESTRICTIONS IMPOSED BY THE FIRM. IN ADDITION, THE FIRM FAILED TO DETECT SEVERAL RED FLAGS THAT SHOULD HAVE ALERTED IT TO THE REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVE'S ACTIVITY. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC) 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 05/01/2017 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 325,000.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: THE FIRM WAS CENSURED AND FINED $325,000. 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). SUMMIT HAS SIGNIFICANTLY EXPANDED AND ENHANCED ITS MANAGEMENT, COMPLIANCE, SUPERVISORY AND LEGAL PERSONNEL AS WELL AS ITS OVERALL COMPLIANCE AND SUPERVISORY STRUCTURES AND TRAINING PROGRAMS. NOTWITHSTANDING THIS AWC'S FINDINGS THAT THE FIRM'S SUPERVISION AND TRAINING REGARDING VA SHARE CLASSES WAS INADEQUATE, WHICH SUMMIT DOES NOT DISPUTE, SUMMIT BELIEVES THAT THE RRS DID MAKE APPROPRIATE SUITABILITY DETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE SHARE CLASSES THEY RECOMMENDED TO THEIR VA CLIENTS. FURTHER, SUMMIT EQUITIES NO LONGER PERMITS RRS TO ASSOCIATE WITH ANY BROKERAGE FIRM OTHER THAN SUMMIT.
regulatory · block 2SUMMIT EQUITIES, INC.PDF pages 112–114
- Advisory affiliate name — filed text
- SUMMIT EQUITIES, INC.
- Regulator name — filed text
- COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SECURITIES DIVISION
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 100,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Settled
Action status / disposition — filed text
THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS THAT IT FAILED TO REASONABLY SUPERVISE ITS DEPARTING REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES TO ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH MA PRIVACY LAWS. EVEN THOUGH THE FIRM HAD ADOPTED A POLICY REQUIRING ALL REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES DEPARTING THE FIRM FOR ANY REASON TO RETURN AND NOT RETAIN COPIES OF ANY RECORDS AND FILES CONTAINING FIRM CUSTOMERS' PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION, AND REQUIRED REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES TO COMPLETE VARIOUS FORMS OF TRAINING IN THIS REGARD, IT PERMITTED ITS REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES TO USE THIRD-PARTY CONTACT OR CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS OVER WHICH THE FIRM DID NOT HAVE ACCESS OR CONTROL. REGISTERED REPRESNTATIVES USING THESE SYSTEMS INPUT FIRM CUSTOMERS' INFORMATION IN SUCH SYSTEM, AND AS A RESULT OF THE FIRM NOT HAVING ACCESS TO THESE SYSTEMS, THE FIRM WAS NOT ABLE TO (I) MONITOR OR CONTROL THE USERS OF EACH SYSTEM IN ORDER TO PREVENT ACCESS BY OR SHARING WITH UNAUTHORIZED PERSONS, (II) MONITOR OR CONTROL THE INFORMATION THAT REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES INPUT INTO THE SYSTEMS TO PREVENT UNAUTHORIZED SHARING OF FIRM CUSTOMERS' PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION, OR (III) REMOTELY WIPE OR OTHERWISE REMOVE ITS CUSTOMERS' PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION WITHIN THOSE SYSTEMS AS NEEDED, SUCH AS WHEN REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES DEPARTED THE FIRM. AS OF DECEMBER 26, 2018, THE FIRM HAS FINALIZED ITS SETTLEMENT WITH MA.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
ALLEGED FAILURE TO REASONABLY SUPERVISE REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES(AS DEFINED BY MA LAWS) TO ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH MA PRIVACY LAWS, RESULTING IN VIOLATION OF MASS.GEN.LAWS. CH110A, SECTION 204(A)(2)(J)
Sanction detail — filed text
A FINE OF $100,00 WAS IMPOSED ON SUMMIT EQUITIES AND PAID IN FULL IN DECEMBER 2018
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE CRD Number: 11039 This advisory affiliate is a Firm an Individual Registered: Yes No Name: SUMMIT EQUITIES, INC. (For individuals, Last, First, Middle) This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SECURITIES DIVISION 2. Principal Sanction: Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s) Other Sanctions: CEASE AND DESIST AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIONS 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 12/26/2018 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: R-2018-0083 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: No Product Other Product Types: 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): ALLEGED FAILURE TO REASONABLY SUPERVISE REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES(AS DEFINED BY MA LAWS) TO ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH MA PRIVACY LAWS, RESULTING IN VIOLATION OF MASS.GEN.LAWS. CH110A, SECTION 204(A)(2)(J) 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Settled 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 12/26/2018 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: SUMMIT AGREED TO CERTIFY THE STEPS IT TOOK TO ENSURE DEPARTING REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES ABIDED BY SUMMIT'S POLICIES PROHIBITING THEM FROM TAKING CUSTOMER PERSONAL INFORMATION; NOTIFY POTENTIALLY IMPACTED MA CUSTOMERS THAT THEIR INFORMATION MAY HAVE BEEN COMPROMISED; AND PROVIDE MA WITH DETAILED INFORMATION REGARDING CERTAIN FORMER REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES WHO USE EXTERNAL CRMS AND HOW SUMMIT PREVENTED SUCH REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES FROM VIOLATING SUMMIT'S POLICIES TO PROTECT CUSTOMER INFORMATION. Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: A FINE OF $100,00 WAS IMPOSED ON SUMMIT EQUITIES AND PAID IN FULL IN DECEMBER 2018 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS THAT IT FAILED TO REASONABLY SUPERVISE ITS DEPARTING REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES TO ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH MA PRIVACY LAWS. EVEN THOUGH THE FIRM HAD ADOPTED A POLICY REQUIRING ALL REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES DEPARTING THE FIRM FOR ANY REASON TO RETURN AND NOT RETAIN COPIES OF ANY RECORDS AND FILES CONTAINING FIRM CUSTOMERS' PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION, AND REQUIRED REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES TO COMPLETE VARIOUS FORMS OF TRAINING IN THIS REGARD, IT PERMITTED ITS REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES TO USE THIRD-PARTY CONTACT OR CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS OVER WHICH THE FIRM DID NOT HAVE ACCESS OR CONTROL. REGISTERED REPRESNTATIVES USING THESE SYSTEMS INPUT FIRM CUSTOMERS' INFORMATION IN SUCH SYSTEM, AND AS A RESULT OF THE FIRM NOT HAVING ACCESS TO THESE SYSTEMS, THE FIRM WAS NOT ABLE TO (I) MONITOR OR CONTROL THE USERS OF EACH SYSTEM IN ORDER TO PREVENT ACCESS BY OR SHARING WITH UNAUTHORIZED PERSONS, (II) MONITOR OR CONTROL THE INFORMATION THAT REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES INPUT INTO THE SYSTEMS TO PREVENT UNAUTHORIZED SHARING OF FIRM CUSTOMERS' PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION, OR (III) REMOTELY WIPE OR OTHERWISE REMOVE ITS CUSTOMERS' PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION WITHIN THOSE SYSTEMS AS NEEDED, SUCH AS WHEN REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES DEPARTED THE FIRM. AS OF DECEMBER 26, 2018, THE FIRM HAS FINALIZED ITS SETTLEMENT WITH MA.
* Metrics are based on the latest available data, including Form ADV filings, brochures, and relationship summaries pulled from the SEC IAPD, and may be subject to change. Learn what is included in the Rialytix data. Please refer to the firm's official disclosures for the most accurate information using their CRD number. This is not investment advice.