Firm profile

World Equity Group, Inc..

SCHAUMBURG, ILCRD 29087Registration Status: ApprovedEffective since March 26, 1999SEC # 801-56328Latest ADV June 9, 2026

World Equity Group, Inc. is an SEC registered investment adviser organized as a corporation with a primary office location in Schaumburg, IL. Its latest Form ADV filing, dated June 9, 2026, reports $1.0B in regulatory assets under management, 165 employees, 38 offices, and 2,999 accounts.

Assets Under Management
$1.0B
Employees
165
Offices
38 offices
Total Clients
3,151

Associated firm names

8 names listed
  • COMPASS ASSET MANAGEMENT
  • WORLD EQUITY GROUP, INC.
  • UNITED FINANCIAL GROUP INC.
  • PRAXIS WEALTH MANAGEMENT

Leadership

3 roles identified
CEOCraig Michael Gould
CCOWilliam Dudley Jr Webb
COOMark John Jr Lishchynsky

Advisory services offered

5 types reported
Educational seminars/workshops
Financial Planning Services
Portfolio management for individuals and small businesses

Fee models offered

3 types reported
Asset based fees
Fixed fees
Hourly charges

Offices & Contact

Primary office

SCHAUMBURG, Illinois, United States

Loading map…

Primary office regionOther reported regions

Shading shows states and countries with reported offices. Cities are listed below; shading does not indicate service coverage.

Illinois

SCHAUMBURGPrimary office · NORTHFIELD · ARLINGTON HEIGHTS · DOLTON · GLEN ELLYN

California

IRVINE · PEBLLE BEACH · SHERMAN OAKS

Connecticut

WESTPORT

Florida

DEERFIELD BEACH · LAKE WORTH · BOCA RATON

Missouri

CHESTERFIELD

Montana

BOZEMAN

Nevada

SPARKS

New Jersey

MORRISTOWN · MANASQUAN · NORTHFIELD

North Carolina

FAYETTEVILLE

Texas

HOUSTON

Washington

BREMERTON

Wisconsin

LAKE MILLS

24 office records listed · 38 total offices reported. 7 additional office addresses are undisclosed and are not mapped. Counts can use different reporting dates. SEC filers may list only their largest 25 additional offices.

Contact and digital presence

ADV profile links

Regulatory Assets Under Management Breakdown

Total regulatory assets under management$1.0Bas of June 9, 2026
Discretionary93.8%
$939M
94% of total RAUM93.8%
Non-discretionary6.2%
$62M
6% of total RAUM6.2%
Regulatory assets under management are split between discretionary and non-discretionary assets.

Client Coverage Demographics

Top client segmentIndividuals represent 96.1% of total clients.
Top client categories% of clientsClients
1
Individuals
96.1%
3,029
2
HNWI
3.9%
122
Categories with <5 clients
Pension and profit sharing plans<5 clients

Assets under management Growth by Quarter

Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.

Total AUM$1.0B
Total Accounts2,999
10Y AUM Change+$393M (+64.6%)

Private Funds

Private funds reported by World Equity Group, Inc..

Loading private fund disclosures…

Employee Growth by Quarter

Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.

Total Employees165
Clients per Employee19:1
10Y Employee Change-10 (-5.7%)

Historical AUM and employee figures reflect available SEC Form ADV filings under this CRD. Filing gaps may reflect registration status changes, dormant periods, state registration periods, firm restructuring, or other reporting changes. Rialytix does not interpolate missing periods.


Ownership

Reported direct and indirect ownership ranges

Each range applies to a separate reported relationship and should not be added together.

Reported ownership ranges

Highlighted bands show the percentage range reported in Form ADV.

0%25%50%75%100%
WENTWORTH MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLCDirect owner · Schedule AInterest in WORLD EQUITY GROUP, INC.
75%+
BINAH CAPITAL GROUP, INC.Indirect owner · Schedule BInterest in WENTWORTH MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC
75%+

Bars represent the reported range at that individual ownership step, not an estimated percentage of the advisory firm. Indirect relationships may refer to intermediate entities rather than directly to World Equity Group, Inc...

Reported ownership and control details

Form ADV · Filing date 2026-06-09 · Schedules A and B

6 entries
#Owner / person & roleInterest in entityReported interestControl personTitle / status acquiredSource
1MARK JOHN JR LISHCHYNSKYCHIEF OPERATING OFFICERIndividualWORLD EQUITY GROUP, INC.Less than 5%Code NAYesCHIEF OPERATING OFFICER07/2013Schedule APDF page 35
2WILLIAM DUDLEY JR WEBBCHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICERIndividualWORLD EQUITY GROUP, INC.Less than 5%Code NAYesCHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER11/2019Schedule APDF page 35
3WENTWORTH MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLCOWNERDomestic entityWORLD EQUITY GROUP, INC.75% or moreCode ENoOWNER05/2021Schedule APDF page 35
4CRAIG MICHAEL GOULDCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERIndividualWORLD EQUITY GROUP, INC.Less than 5%Code NAYesCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER05/2021Schedule APDF page 35
5STEPHEN STANLEY DUDASPRESIDENTIndividualWORLD EQUITY GROUP, INC.Less than 5%Code NAYesPRESIDENT01/2024Schedule APDF page 35
6BINAH CAPITAL GROUP, INC.OWNERDomestic entityWENTWORTH MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC75% or moreCode ENoOWNER03/2024Schedule BPDF page 36

Less than 5% may include zero. Code F identifies a role without specifying a percentage. Reported interests may overlap and may not include every owner. Total indirect ownership is not calculated.

Compliance & Disclosures

Filing dated 6/9/2026 2:54:18 PM

Responses were selected by the RIA in its filing. Questions are shortened for readability; “you” refers to the reporting firm, and some questions also cover advisory affiliates.

RIA or supervised-person involvementThe RIA reported that one or more events below involve the firm or its supervised persons.RIA responseYes
AFelonies2 No

In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:

  • A1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a felony?No
  • A2Been charged with a felony?No
BMisdemeanors2 No

In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:

  • B1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a misdemeanor involving investments, an investment-related business, fraud, false statements or omissions, wrongful taking of property, bribery, perjury, forgery, counterfeiting, or extortion?No
  • B2Been charged with a misdemeanor of the kind listed above?No
CSEC or CFTC actions5 No

Has the SEC or CFTC ever:

  • C1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
  • C2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated SEC or CFTC regulations or statutes?No
  • C3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
  • C4Entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
  • C5Imposed a civil money penalty on you or an advisory affiliate, or ordered you or an advisory affiliate to cease and desist from any activity?No
DOther regulatory actions3 Yes2 No

Has any other federal regulatory agency, state regulatory agency, or foreign financial regulatory authority ever:

  • D1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission, or was dishonest, unfair, or unethical?Yes
  • D2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related regulations or statutes?Yes
  • D3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
  • D4In the past ten years, entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?Yes
  • D5Denied, suspended, or revoked your or an advisory affiliate’s registration or license, or otherwise prevented association with an investment-related business or restricted activities?No
ESelf-regulatory organization actions2 Yes2 No

Has a self-regulatory organization or commodities exchange ever:

  • E1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
  • E2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated its rules, other than a violation designated as a minor rule violation under an SEC-approved plan?Yes
  • E3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
  • E4Disciplined you or an advisory affiliate by expulsion, suspension, barring association with other members, or otherwise restricting activities?Yes
FProfessional authorizations1 No
  • FHas an authorization to act as an attorney, accountant, or federal contractor granted to you or an advisory affiliate ever been revoked or suspended?No
GPending regulatory proceedings1 No
  • GAre you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a regulatory proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of C, D, or E?No
HCivil judicial actions and proceedings4 No

(1) Court actions

Has a domestic or foreign court:

  • H(1)(a)In the past ten years, enjoined you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
  • H(1)(b)Found that you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related statutes or regulations?No
  • H(1)(c)Dismissed, pursuant to a settlement agreement, an investment-related civil action brought against you or an advisory affiliate by a state or foreign financial regulatory authority?No

(2) Pending civil proceedings

  • H(2)Are you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a civil proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of H(1)?No
Additional DRP filings 15 source blocks

Verbatim excerpts from supporting DRP filings, which may concern the firm or advisory affiliates. Amounts retain their filed labels; no total or attribution is inferred.

regulatory · block 1PDF pages 36–38
Regulator name — filed text
FINRA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 225,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)

Action status / disposition — filed text

TO AVOID THE UNCERTAINTY AND COST ASSOCIATED WITH A HEARING AND IN AN EFFORT TO PUT THESE LEGACY ISSUES BEHIND US, WORLD EQUITY GROUP PURSUED SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS AS SOON AS THEY WERE MADE AVAILABLE TO US. SINCE THESE ISSUES WERE RECOGNIZED BY WORLD EQUITY GROUP, THE FIRM HAS RESTRUCTURED ITS COMPLIANCE AND SUPERVISION STAFF AND ADDED SOME KEY NEW HIRES WHICH BRING MULTIPLE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE TO THE TEAM. THE FIRM HAS ALSO REWRITTEN CERTAIN SECTIONS OF ITS WSPS SO AS TO FURTHER STRENGTHEN ITS PROCEDURES.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS THAT IT FAILED TO IMPLEMENT A REASONABLY DESIGNED ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING (AML) PROGRAM TO DETECT, INVESTIGATE AND REPORT POTENTIALLY SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY. THE FINDINGS STATED THAT THE FIRM'S WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES (WSPS) PROVIDED SPECIFIC EXAMPLES OF RED FLAGS INDICATIVE OF POTENTIALLY SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITIES WHICH SHOULD HAVE TRIGGERED ADDITIONAL DUE DILIGENCE UNDER THE FIRM'S EXISTING AML PROGRAM. WHEN REVIEWED, THE FIRM COULD NOT EVIDENCE IMPLEMENTATION OF ITS AML SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY MONITORING PROGRAM AS IT FAILED TO DETECT, INVESTIGATE AND REPORT RED FLAGS OF POTENTIALLY SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY RELATED TO THE DEPOSIT AND LIQUIDATION OF LOW-PRICED SECURITIES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, VARIOUS TRANSACTIONS BY PERSONS WHILE THOSE PERSONS AT LEAST POTENTIALLY MAY HAVE BEEN IN POSSESSION OF MATERIAL, NON-PUBLIC INFORMATION. THE FIRM DID NOT EMPLOY ANY MANUAL OR AUTOMATED SURVEILLANCES TO CAPTURE POTENTIALLY SUSPICIOUS MONEY MOVEMENTS OR TRADING ACTIVITY, BUT INSTEAD IMPROPERLY RELIED ON ITS CLEARING FIRM TO RAISE POTENTIAL RED FLAGS TO ITS ATTENTION. THE FIRM'S INVESTIGATIONS OF THOSE RED FLAGS DETECTED BY ITS CLEARING FIRM WERE ALSO HANDLED INADEQUATELY. THE FIRM'S 2011 AML COMPLIANCE PROGRAM INDEPENDENT 2011 TEST WAS NOT ADEQUATE AS THE PERSON CONDUCTING THE TEST DID NOT TAKE APPROPRIATE STEPS TO AUDIT FOR DEFICIENCIES IN THE SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY MONITORING PROGRAM. THE FINDINGS ALSO STATED THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO HAVE A REASONABLE SUPERVISORY SYSTEM TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 5 OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933. THE FIRM FAILED TO CONDUCT A REASONABLE SEARCHING INQUIRY INTO THE TRADABILITY OF THE SECURITIES BY NOT INDEPENDENTLY CORROBORATING INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTATION OBTAINED THROUGH SOURCES AND THEREFORE FAILED TO EVIDENCE THAT AN ADEQUATE INVESTIGATION WAS CONDUCTED BY A REGISTERED PRINCIPAL. THE FINDINGS ALSO INCLUDED THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO ENFORCE ITS OWN INFORMATION BARRIERS PROCEDURES AND AS A RESULT, ALLOWED POTENTIALLY SUSPICIOUS TRANSACTIONS TO GO UNDETECTED, AND EMPLOYEES WHO WERE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE PRIVY TO MATERIAL, NON-PUBLIC INFORMATION TO HAVE SUCH ACCESS WITHOUT FOLLOWING ITS OWN PROCEDURES TO GIVE EMPLOYEES THAT ACCESS. FINRA FOUND THAT DUE TO ERRORS IN THE PROCESS OF TRANSFERRING REPRESENTATIVES AT A NEW BRANCH TO THE FIRM, THE EMAILS OF THE REPRESENTATIVES LOCATED AT THAT BRANCH WERE NOT MAINTAINED AND PRESERVED BEFORE APRIL 13, 2012. IN ADDITION, DUE TO TECHNOLOGY LINKING ISSUES, THE FIRM FAILED TO MAINTAIN BUSINESS-RELATED EMAILS FOR REPRESENTATIVES WHO USED THEIR PERSONAL EMAILS FOR BUSINESS PURPOSES, EVEN THOUGH THE FIRM WAS AWARE OF THE USE OF THE NON-FIRM EMAIL DOMAINS. FINRA ALSO FOUND THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO ESTABLISH ACCOUNTS AND MAINTAIN ACCOUNT RECORDS FOR NEW CUSTOMERS INVESTING IN AN OFFERING AND FAILED TO MAKE REASONABLE EFFORTS TO OBTAIN ADEQUATE INFORMATION IN REGARDS TO THOSE CUSTOMERS. IN ADDITION, FINRA DETERMINED THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO HAVE A SYSTEM IN PLACE TO ENSURE THE SUITABILITY OF NON-TRADITIONAL EXCHANGE-TRADED FUNDS (ETFS) AND LACKED TRAINING AND SUPERVISION OF THESE PRODUCTS AND TRANSACTIONS. THERE WERE OVER 100 NON-TRADITIONAL ETFS THAT WERE HELD MORE THAN ONE TRADING DAY, YET THOSE TRANSACTIONS WERE NOT FLAGGED FOR REVIEW. THE FIRM INSUFFICIENTLY DOCUMENTED THAT ADEQUATE DILIGENCE WAS CONDUCTED WITH RESPECT TO THE PRIVATE PLACEMENTS AND NON-TRADED REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS (REITS). THE FIRM'S WSPS WERE INADEQUATE IN THAT THEY GENERICALLY REFERENCED CCO REVIEW, BUT FAILED TO IDENTIFY SPECIFIC STEPS TO BE TAKEN AND DID NOT OUTLINE HOW THE FIRM WOULD DOCUMENT AND EVIDENCE THE DUE DILIGENCE. THE FIRM ALSO FAILED TO ESTABLISH AN ADEQUATE SUPERVISORY SYSTEM FOR THE REVIEW OF ACTIVITY IN AN AVERAGE PRICE ACCOUNT, RESULTING IN NUMEROUS OPTIONS ACTIVITIES OCCURRING IN UNAPPROVED ACCOUNTS.

Sanction detail — filed text

THE FIRM WAS CENSURED AND FINED $225,000.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.

This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FINRA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Censure
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
02/03/2015
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
2012030734701
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other
Other Product Types: 
NON-TRADITIONAL ETFS; PRIVATE PLACEMENTS; NON-TRADED REITS
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS THAT IT FAILED TO
IMPLEMENT A REASONABLY DESIGNED ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING (AML) PROGRAM TO DETECT, INVESTIGATE AND REPORT POTENTIALLY SUSPICIOUS
ACTIVITY. THE FINDINGS STATED THAT THE FIRM'S WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES (WSPS) PROVIDED SPECIFIC EXAMPLES OF RED FLAGS
INDICATIVE OF POTENTIALLY SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITIES WHICH SHOULD HAVE TRIGGERED ADDITIONAL DUE DILIGENCE UNDER THE FIRM'S EXISTING
AML PROGRAM. WHEN REVIEWED, THE FIRM COULD NOT EVIDENCE IMPLEMENTATION OF ITS AML SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY MONITORING PROGRAM AS IT
FAILED TO DETECT, INVESTIGATE AND REPORT RED FLAGS OF POTENTIALLY SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY RELATED TO THE DEPOSIT AND LIQUIDATION OF
LOW-PRICED SECURITIES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, VARIOUS TRANSACTIONS BY PERSONS WHILE THOSE PERSONS AT LEAST POTENTIALLY
MAY HAVE BEEN IN POSSESSION OF MATERIAL, NON-PUBLIC INFORMATION. THE FIRM DID NOT EMPLOY ANY MANUAL OR AUTOMATED SURVEILLANCES
TO CAPTURE POTENTIALLY SUSPICIOUS MONEY MOVEMENTS OR TRADING ACTIVITY, BUT INSTEAD IMPROPERLY RELIED ON ITS CLEARING FIRM TO
RAISE POTENTIAL RED FLAGS TO ITS ATTENTION. THE FIRM'S INVESTIGATIONS OF THOSE RED FLAGS DETECTED BY ITS CLEARING FIRM WERE ALSO
HANDLED INADEQUATELY. THE FIRM'S 2011 AML COMPLIANCE PROGRAM INDEPENDENT 2011 TEST WAS NOT ADEQUATE AS THE PERSON CONDUCTING
THE TEST DID NOT TAKE APPROPRIATE STEPS TO AUDIT FOR DEFICIENCIES IN THE SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY MONITORING PROGRAM. THE FINDINGS ALSO
STATED THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO HAVE A REASONABLE SUPERVISORY SYSTEM TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 5 OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF
1933. THE FIRM FAILED TO CONDUCT A REASONABLE SEARCHING INQUIRY INTO THE TRADABILITY OF THE SECURITIES BY NOT INDEPENDENTLY
CORROBORATING INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTATION OBTAINED THROUGH SOURCES AND THEREFORE FAILED TO EVIDENCE THAT AN ADEQUATE
INVESTIGATION WAS CONDUCTED BY A REGISTERED PRINCIPAL. THE FINDINGS ALSO INCLUDED THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO ENFORCE ITS OWN
INFORMATION BARRIERS PROCEDURES AND AS A RESULT, ALLOWED POTENTIALLY SUSPICIOUS TRANSACTIONS TO GO UNDETECTED, AND EMPLOYEES
WHO WERE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE PRIVY TO MATERIAL, NON-PUBLIC INFORMATION TO HAVE SUCH ACCESS WITHOUT FOLLOWING ITS OWN
PROCEDURES TO GIVE EMPLOYEES THAT ACCESS. FINRA FOUND THAT DUE TO ERRORS IN THE PROCESS OF TRANSFERRING REPRESENTATIVES AT A
NEW BRANCH TO THE FIRM, THE EMAILS OF THE REPRESENTATIVES LOCATED AT THAT BRANCH WERE NOT MAINTAINED AND PRESERVED BEFORE APRIL
13, 2012. IN ADDITION, DUE TO TECHNOLOGY LINKING ISSUES, THE FIRM FAILED TO MAINTAIN BUSINESS-RELATED EMAILS FOR REPRESENTATIVES
WHO USED THEIR PERSONAL EMAILS FOR BUSINESS PURPOSES, EVEN THOUGH THE FIRM WAS AWARE OF THE USE OF THE NON-FIRM EMAIL DOMAINS.
FINRA ALSO FOUND THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO ESTABLISH ACCOUNTS AND MAINTAIN ACCOUNT RECORDS FOR NEW CUSTOMERS INVESTING IN AN
OFFERING AND FAILED TO MAKE REASONABLE EFFORTS TO OBTAIN ADEQUATE INFORMATION IN REGARDS TO THOSE CUSTOMERS. IN ADDITION, FINRA
DETERMINED THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO HAVE A SYSTEM IN PLACE TO ENSURE THE SUITABILITY OF NON-TRADITIONAL EXCHANGE-TRADED FUNDS
(ETFS) AND LACKED TRAINING AND SUPERVISION OF THESE PRODUCTS AND TRANSACTIONS. THERE WERE OVER 100 NON-TRADITIONAL ETFS THAT
WERE HELD MORE THAN ONE TRADING DAY, YET THOSE TRANSACTIONS WERE NOT FLAGGED FOR REVIEW. THE FIRM INSUFFICIENTLY DOCUMENTED

THAT ADEQUATE DILIGENCE WAS CONDUCTED WITH RESPECT TO THE PRIVATE PLACEMENTS AND NON-TRADED REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS
(REITS). THE FIRM'S WSPS WERE INADEQUATE IN THAT THEY GENERICALLY REFERENCED CCO REVIEW, BUT FAILED TO IDENTIFY SPECIFIC STEPS TO
BE TAKEN AND DID NOT OUTLINE HOW THE FIRM WOULD DOCUMENT AND EVIDENCE THE DUE DILIGENCE. THE FIRM ALSO FAILED TO ESTABLISH AN
ADEQUATE SUPERVISORY SYSTEM FOR THE REVIEW OF ACTIVITY IN AN AVERAGE PRICE ACCOUNT, RESULTING IN NUMEROUS OPTIONS ACTIVITIES
OCCURRING IN UNAPPROVED ACCOUNTS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
02/03/2015
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 225,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
THE FIRM WAS CENSURED AND FINED $225,000.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
TO AVOID THE UNCERTAINTY AND COST ASSOCIATED WITH A HEARING AND IN AN EFFORT TO PUT THESE LEGACY ISSUES BEHIND US, WORLD EQUITY
GROUP PURSUED SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS AS SOON AS THEY WERE MADE AVAILABLE TO US. SINCE THESE ISSUES WERE RECOGNIZED BY WORLD
EQUITY GROUP, THE FIRM HAS RESTRUCTURED ITS COMPLIANCE AND SUPERVISION STAFF AND ADDED SOME KEY NEW HIRES WHICH BRING MULTIPLE
YEARS OF EXPERIENCE TO THE TEAM. THE FIRM HAS ALSO REWRITTEN CERTAIN SECTIONS OF ITS WSPS SO AS TO FURTHER STRENGTHEN ITS
PROCEDURES.
regulatory · block 2PDF pages 38–40
Regulator name — filed text
FINRA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 100,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)

Action status / disposition — filed text

FROM APRIL 2013 THROUGH MARCH OF 2017, THE FIRM FAILED TO ESTABLISH, MAINTAIN AND ENFORCE A SUPERVISORY SYSTEM AND WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ENSURE THAT REPRESENTATIVES' RECOMMENDATIONS OF VARIABLE ANNUITIES COMPLIED WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES LAWS AND REGULATIONS, AND FINRA RULES. AS A RESULT, THE FIRM VIOLATED FINRA RULES 2330(C) AND (D), NASD RULE 3010 (FOR CONDUCT BEFORE DECEMBER 1, 2014), FINRA RULE 3110 (FOR CONDUCT ON AND AFTER DECEMBER 1, 2014 AND FINRA RULE 2010.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

FROM APRIL 2013 THROUGH MARCH OF 2017, THE FIRM FAILED TO ESTABLISH, MAINTAIN AND ENFORCE A SUPERVISORY SYSTEM AND WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ENSURE THAT REPRESENTATIVES' RECOMMENDATIONS OF VARIABLE ANNUITIES COMPLIED WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES LAWS AND REGULATIONS, AND FINRA RULES. AS A RESULT, THE FIRM VIOLATED FINRA RULES 2330(C) AND (D), NASD RULE 3010 (FOR CONDUCT BEFORE DECEMBER 1, 2014), FINRA RULE 3110 (FOR CONDUCT ON AND AFTER DECEMBER 1, 2014 AND FINRA RULE 2010.

Sanction detail — filed text

THE FIRM WAS CENSURED AND FINED $100,000 AND ORDERED TO PAY NOT LESS THAN $380,000 IN RESTITUTION TO CUSTOMERS WHO PURCHASED L-SHARE VARIABLE ANNUITY CONTRACTS WITH LONG TERM RIDERS AND NO PERSISTENCY CREDITS FROM JUNE 1, 2013 THROUGH MAY 31, 2018 AND WHO CURRENTLY HOLD THOSE CONTRACTS AT THE FIRM.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)

You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FINRA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Censure
Other Sanctions: 
RESTITUTION
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/23/2018
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
201504364901
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Annuity(ies) - Variable
Other Product Types: 
NONE
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
FROM APRIL 2013 THROUGH MARCH OF 2017, THE FIRM FAILED TO ESTABLISH, MAINTAIN AND ENFORCE A SUPERVISORY SYSTEM AND WRITTEN
SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ENSURE THAT REPRESENTATIVES' RECOMMENDATIONS OF VARIABLE ANNUITIES COMPLIED
WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES LAWS AND REGULATIONS, AND FINRA RULES. AS A RESULT, THE FIRM VIOLATED FINRA RULES 2330(C) AND (D), NASD
RULE 3010 (FOR CONDUCT BEFORE DECEMBER 1, 2014), FINRA RULE 3110 (FOR CONDUCT ON AND AFTER DECEMBER 1, 2014 AND FINRA RULE 2010.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.

10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
08/23/2018
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
RESTITUTION TO CUSTOMER NOT LESS THAN $380,000.
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
THE FIRM WAS CENSURED AND FINED $100,000 AND ORDERED TO PAY NOT LESS THAN $380,000 IN RESTITUTION TO CUSTOMERS WHO
PURCHASED L-SHARE VARIABLE ANNUITY CONTRACTS WITH LONG TERM RIDERS AND NO PERSISTENCY CREDITS FROM JUNE 1, 2013 THROUGH
MAY 31, 2018 AND WHO CURRENTLY HOLD THOSE CONTRACTS AT THE FIRM.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
FROM APRIL 2013 THROUGH MARCH OF 2017, THE FIRM FAILED TO ESTABLISH, MAINTAIN AND ENFORCE A SUPERVISORY SYSTEM AND WRITTEN
SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ENSURE THAT REPRESENTATIVES' RECOMMENDATIONS OF VARIABLE ANNUITIES COMPLIED
WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES LAWS AND REGULATIONS, AND FINRA RULES. AS A RESULT, THE FIRM VIOLATED FINRA RULES 2330(C) AND (D), NASD
RULE 3010 (FOR CONDUCT BEFORE DECEMBER 1, 2014), FINRA RULE 3110 (FOR CONDUCT ON AND AFTER DECEMBER 1, 2014 AND FINRA RULE 2010.
regulatory · block 3DALLAS, CHRISTOPHER, TPDF pages 40–42
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
DALLAS, CHRISTOPHER, T
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
3233864
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual

Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
DALLAS, CHRISTOPHER, T
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution

 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 4COKINIS, CHRISTOPHER ALEXPDF pages 42–43
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
COKINIS, CHRISTOPHER ALEX
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
1527389
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
COKINIS, CHRISTOPHER ALEX
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No

NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 5LISHCHYNSKY, MARK JOHN JRPDF pages 43–45
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
LISHCHYNSKY, MARK JOHN JR
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action

Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
2478952
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
LISHCHYNSKY, MARK JOHN JR
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):

6.
Principal Product Type:
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 6PDF pages 45–47
Regulator name — filed text
FLORIDA DEPT. OF FINANCIAL SERVICES
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 1,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Order

Action status / disposition — filed text

FIRM, IN AN EFFORT TO MOVE ALONG ITS INSURANCE APPLICATION IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ON OCT. 12, 2007 SIGNED A CONSENT ORDER AND PAID A $1,000 'ADMINISTRATIVE FEE'. AT THE TIME, FIRM WAS LED TO BELIEVE BY FL THAT THIS WOULD NOT BE A REPORTABLE EVENT.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

FLORIDA ALLEGED THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO TIMELY FILE AN INSURANCE AGENCY APPLICATION.

Sanction detail — filed text

FIRM PAID ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY OF $1,000 IN OCTOBER OF 2007.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates

If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FLORIDA DEPT. OF FINANCIAL SERVICES
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
NONE
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
09/07/2007
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
91860-07-AG
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
FLORIDA ALLEGED THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO TIMELY FILE AN INSURANCE AGENCY APPLICATION.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Order
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
10/12/2007
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:

12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 1,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
FIRM PAID ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY OF $1,000 IN OCTOBER OF 2007.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
FIRM, IN AN EFFORT TO MOVE ALONG ITS INSURANCE APPLICATION IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ON OCT. 12, 2007 SIGNED A CONSENT ORDER AND
PAID A $1,000 'ADMINISTRATIVE FEE'. AT THE TIME, FIRM WAS LED TO BELIEVE BY FL THAT THIS WOULD NOT BE A REPORTABLE EVENT.
Show 9 more source blocks
regulatory · block 7BABJAK, RICHARD STEVEN JRPDF pages 47–49
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
BABJAK, RICHARD STEVEN JR
Regulator name — filed text
FINRA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 50,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)

Action status / disposition — filed text

LETTER OF AWC WAS SIGNED ON DEC. 5, 2011.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

VIOLATIONS OF FINRA RULES REGARDING THE SUPERVISION OF ADVERTISING, COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE PUBLIC AND LICENSING AND REGISTRATION FUNCTIONS. VIOLATIONS INCLUDE FINRA RULE 2010, NASD RULES 2110, 2210(B)(2)(A), 2210(D)(1)(A), 2210(D)(1)(B), 2210(D)(2)(C) (I), 3010, 3010(A), 3010(B), 3110(A), INTERPRETATIVE MATERIAL 2210-1 ALLEGING THAT THE FIRM PERMITTED ONE OF ITS REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES TO PUBLISH ADVERTISEMENTS THAT FAILED TO PROVIDE A SOUND BASIS FOR A READER TO EVALUATE THE PRODUCTS AND SERVICES BEING OFFERED, CONTAINED EXAGGERATED, UNWARRANTED AND MISLEADING STATEMENTS, AND FAILED TO DISCLOSE THE FIRM'S NAME.

Sanction detail — filed text

THE $50,000 FINE WAS ASSESSED JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY AND PAID BY CHECK.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
2074968
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
BABJAK, RICHARD STEVEN JR
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any

event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FINRA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
CENSURE
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
12/13/2011
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
AWC 2008012099101
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
WORLD EQUITY GROUP
6.
Principal Product Type:
Insurance
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
VIOLATIONS OF FINRA RULES REGARDING THE SUPERVISION OF ADVERTISING, COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE PUBLIC AND LICENSING AND
REGISTRATION FUNCTIONS. VIOLATIONS INCLUDE FINRA RULE 2010, NASD RULES 2110, 2210(B)(2)(A), 2210(D)(1)(A), 2210(D)(1)(B), 2210(D)(2)(C)
(I), 3010, 3010(A), 3010(B), 3110(A), INTERPRETATIVE MATERIAL 2210-1 ALLEGING THAT THE FIRM PERMITTED ONE OF ITS REGISTERED
REPRESENTATIVES TO PUBLISH ADVERTISEMENTS THAT FAILED TO PROVIDE A SOUND BASIS FOR A READER TO EVALUATE THE PRODUCTS AND
SERVICES BEING OFFERED, CONTAINED EXAGGERATED, UNWARRANTED AND MISLEADING STATEMENTS, AND FAILED TO DISCLOSE THE FIRM'S NAME.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/13/2011
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 50,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension

B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
THE $50,000 FINE WAS ASSESSED JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY AND PAID BY CHECK.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
LETTER OF AWC WAS SIGNED ON DEC. 5, 2011.
regulatory · block 8PDF pages 49–50
Regulator name — filed text
FINRA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 15,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE FIRM SIGNED A LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT ON 12/12/2011. THE OATS REPORTING REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN CORRECTED.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

VIOLATIONS OF FINRA RULES REGARDING THE SUBMISSION OF OATS REPORTABLE TRANSACTIONS. THE FIRM DID NOT QUALIFY FOR EXCLUSION FROM THE OATS REPORTING REQUIREMENTS BECAUSE IT ROUTED ITS ORDERS THROUGH TWO REPORTING MEMBERS.

Sanction detail — filed text

A CENSURE AND A $15,000 FINE WERE IMPOSED.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
t e
o C
o
t e e e t
t e a s
e
s
es,
o ot e
o
at o
o
t
s
ust be p o
ded
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:

SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FINRA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
12/12/2011
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
STAR NO. 20100243065
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
VIOLATIONS OF FINRA RULES REGARDING THE SUBMISSION OF OATS REPORTABLE TRANSACTIONS. THE FIRM DID NOT QUALIFY FOR EXCLUSION FROM
THE OATS REPORTING REQUIREMENTS BECAUSE IT ROUTED ITS ORDERS THROUGH TWO REPORTING MEMBERS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/12/2011
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 15,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
A CENSURE AND A $15,000 FINE WERE IMPOSED.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE FIRM SIGNED A LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT ON 12/12/2011. THE OATS REPORTING REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN CORRECTED.
regulatory · block 9PDF pages 50–52
Regulator name — filed text
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 250.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Settled

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE FIRM SELF-REPORTED TO THE NORTH CAROLINA INSURANCE DERPARTMENT UPON DISCOVERY THAT THE ORIGINAL ISSUE WAS A REPORTABLE EVENT. SINCE IT WAS PAST THE 30 DAY REPORTING PERIOD, THE NORTH CAROLINA INSURANCE DEPARTMENT SENT THE FIRM A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (WHICH INCLUDED A STIPULATION THAT THE AGREEMENT WOULD HAVE THE FULL EFFECT OF THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER) AND ASSESSED A SMALL CIVIL FINE.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

THE FIRM DID NOT FILE A REPORTABLE EVENT TO THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE WITHIN THE REQUIRED TIMEFRAME ACCORDING TO THEIR STATUTES.

Sanction detail — filed text

THE $250.00 FINE WAS PAID ON 12/09/2013
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.

Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other
Other Sanctions: 
ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
12/09/2013
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:

Insurance
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE FIRM DID NOT FILE A REPORTABLE EVENT TO THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE WITHIN THE REQUIRED TIMEFRAME ACCORDING
TO THEIR STATUTES.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Settled
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/09/2013
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 250.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
THE $250.00 FINE WAS PAID ON 12/09/2013
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE FIRM SELF-REPORTED TO THE NORTH CAROLINA INSURANCE DERPARTMENT UPON DISCOVERY THAT THE ORIGINAL ISSUE WAS A REPORTABLE
EVENT. SINCE IT WAS PAST THE 30 DAY REPORTING PERIOD, THE NORTH CAROLINA INSURANCE DEPARTMENT SENT THE FIRM A SETTLEMENT
AGREEMENT (WHICH INCLUDED A STIPULATION THAT THE AGREEMENT WOULD HAVE THE FULL EFFECT OF THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER) AND
ASSESSED A SMALL CIVIL FINE.
regulatory · block 10PDF pages 52–54
Regulator name — filed text
FINRA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 225,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)

Action status / disposition — filed text

TO AVOID THE UNCERTAINTY AND COST ASSOCIATED WITH A HEARING AND IN AN EFFORT TO PUT THESE LEGACY ISSUES BEHIND US, WORLD EQUITY GROUP PURSUED SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS AS SOON AS THEY WERE MADE AVAILABLE TO US. SINCE THESE ISSUES WERE RECOGNIZED BY WORLD EQUITY GROUP, THE FIRM HAS RESTRUCTURED ITS COMPLIANCE AND SUPERVISION STAFF AND ADDED SOME KEY NEW HIRES WHICH BRING MULTIPLE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE TO THE TEAM. THE FIRM HAS ALSO REWRITTEN CERTAIN SECTIONS OF ITS WSPS SO AS TO FURTHER STRENGTHEN ITS PROCEDURES.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS THAT IT FAILED TO IMPLEMENT A REASONABLY DESIGNED ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING (AML) PROGRAM TO DETECT, INVESTIGATE AND REPORT POTENTIALLY SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY. THE FINDINGS STATED THAT THE FIRM'S WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES (WSPS) PROVIDED SPECIFIC EXAMPLES OF RED FLAGS INDICATIVE OF POTENTIALLY SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITIES WHICH SHOULD HAVE TRIGGERED ADDITIONAL DUE DILIGENCE UNDER THE FIRM'S EXISTING AML PROGRAM. WHEN REVIEWED, THE FIRM COULD NOT EVIDENCE IMPLEMENTATION OF ITS AML SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY MONITORING PROGRAM AS IT FAILED TO DETECT, INVESTIGATE AND REPORT RED FLAGS OF POTENTIALLY SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY RELATED TO THE DEPOSIT AND LIQUIDATION OF LOW-PRICED SECURITIES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, VARIOUS TRANSACTIONS BY PERSONS WHILE THOSE PERSONS AT LEAST POTENTIALLY MAY HAVE BEEN IN POSSESSION OF MATERIAL, NON-PUBLIC INFORMATION. THE FIRM DID NOT EMPLOY ANY MANUAL OR AUTOMATED SURVEILLANCES TO CAPTURE POTENTIALLY SUSPICIOUS MONEY MOVEMENTS OR TRADING ACTIVITY, BUT INSTEAD IMPROPERLY RELIED ON ITS CLEARING FIRM TO RAISE POTENTIAL RED FLAGS TO ITS ATTENTION. THE FIRM'S INVESTIGATIONS OF THOSE RED FLAGS DETECTED BY ITS CLEARING FIRM WERE ALSO HANDLED INADEQUATELY. THE FIRM'S 2011 AML COMPLIANCE PROGRAM INDEPENDENT 2011 TEST WAS NOT ADEQUATE AS THE PERSON CONDUCTING THE TEST DID NOT TAKE APPROPRIATE STEPS TO AUDIT FOR DEFICIENCIES IN THE SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY MONITORING PROGRAM. THE FINDINGS ALSO STATED THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO HAVE A REASONABLE SUPERVISORY SYSTEM TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 5 OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933. THE FIRM FAILED TO CONDUCT A REASONABLE SEARCHING INQUIRY INTO THE TRADABILITY OF THE SECURITIES BY NOT INDEPENDENTLY CORROBORATING INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTATION OBTAINED THROUGH SOURCES AND THEREFORE FAILED TO EVIDENCE THAT AN ADEQUATE INVESTIGATION WAS CONDUCTED BY A REGISTERED PRINCIPAL. THE FINDINGS ALSO INCLUDED THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO ENFORCE ITS OWN INFORMATION BARRIERS PROCEDURES AND AS A RESULT, ALLOWED POTENTIALLY SUSPICIOUS TRANSACTIONS TO GO UNDETECTED, AND EMPLOYEES WHO WERE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE PRIVY TO MATERIAL, NON-PUBLIC INFORMATION TO HAVE SUCH ACCESS WITHOUT FOLLOWING ITS OWN PROCEDURES TO GIVE EMPLOYEES THAT ACCESS. FINRA FOUND THAT DUE TO ERRORS IN THE PROCESS OF TRANSFERRING REPRESENTATIVES AT A NEW BRANCH TO THE FIRM, THE EMAILS OF THE REPRESENTATIVES LOCATED AT THAT BRANCH WERE NOT MAINTAINED AND PRESERVED BEFORE APRIL 13, 2012. IN ADDITION, DUE TO TECHNOLOGY LINKING ISSUES, THE FIRM FAILED TO MAINTAIN BUSINESS-RELATED EMAILS FOR REPRESENTATIVES WHO USED THEIR PERSONAL EMAILS FOR BUSINESS PURPOSES, EVEN THOUGH THE FIRM WAS AWARE OF THE USE OF THE NON-FIRM EMAIL DOMAINS. FINRA ALSO FOUND THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO ESTABLISH ACCOUNTS AND MAINTAIN ACCOUNT RECORDS FOR NEW CUSTOMERS INVESTING IN AN OFFERING AND FAILED TO MAKE REASONABLE EFFORTS TO OBTAIN ADEQUATE INFORMATION IN REGARDS TO THOSE CUSTOMERS. IN ADDITION, FINRA DETERMINED THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO HAVE A SYSTEM IN PLACE TO ENSURE THE SUITABILITY OF NON-TRADITIONAL EXCHANGE-TRADED FUNDS (ETFS) AND LACKED TRAINING AND SUPERVISION OF THESE PRODUCTS AND TRANSACTIONS. THERE WERE OVER 100 NON-TRADITIONAL ETFS THAT WERE HELD MORE THAN ONE TRADING DAY, YET THOSE TRANSACTIONS WERE NOT FLAGGED FOR REVIEW. THE FIRM INSUFFICIENTLY DOCUMENTED THAT ADEQUATE DILIGENCE WAS CONDUCTED WITH RESPECT TO THE PRIVATE PLACEMENTS AND NON-TRADED REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS (REITS). THE FIRM'S WSPS WERE INADEQUATE IN THAT THEY GENERICALLY REFERENCED CCO REVIEW, BUT FAILED TO IDENTIFY SPECIFIC STEPS TO BE TAKEN AND DID NOT OUTLINE HOW THE FIRM WOULD DOCUMENT AND EVIDENCE THE DUE DILIGENCE. THE FIRM ALSO FAILED TO ESTABLISH AN ADEQUATE SUPERVISORY SYSTEM FOR THE REVIEW OF ACTIVITY IN AN AVERAGE PRICE ACCOUNT, RESULTING IN NUMEROUS OPTIONS ACTIVITIES OCCURRING IN UNAPPROVED ACCOUNTS.

Sanction detail — filed text

THE FIRM WAS CENSURED AND FINED $225,000.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):

You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FINRA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Censure
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
02/03/2015
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
2012030734701
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other
Other Product Types: 
NON-TRADITIONAL ETFS; PRIVATE PLACEMENTS; NON-TRADED REITS
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS THAT IT FAILED TO
IMPLEMENT A REASONABLY DESIGNED ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING (AML) PROGRAM TO DETECT, INVESTIGATE AND REPORT POTENTIALLY SUSPICIOUS
ACTIVITY. THE FINDINGS STATED THAT THE FIRM'S WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES (WSPS) PROVIDED SPECIFIC EXAMPLES OF RED FLAGS
INDICATIVE OF POTENTIALLY SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITIES WHICH SHOULD HAVE TRIGGERED ADDITIONAL DUE DILIGENCE UNDER THE FIRM'S EXISTING
AML PROGRAM. WHEN REVIEWED, THE FIRM COULD NOT EVIDENCE IMPLEMENTATION OF ITS AML SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY MONITORING PROGRAM AS IT
FAILED TO DETECT, INVESTIGATE AND REPORT RED FLAGS OF POTENTIALLY SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY RELATED TO THE DEPOSIT AND LIQUIDATION OF
LOW-PRICED SECURITIES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, VARIOUS TRANSACTIONS BY PERSONS WHILE THOSE PERSONS AT LEAST POTENTIALLY
MAY HAVE BEEN IN POSSESSION OF MATERIAL, NON-PUBLIC INFORMATION. THE FIRM DID NOT EMPLOY ANY MANUAL OR AUTOMATED SURVEILLANCES
TO CAPTURE POTENTIALLY SUSPICIOUS MONEY MOVEMENTS OR TRADING ACTIVITY, BUT INSTEAD IMPROPERLY RELIED ON ITS CLEARING FIRM TO
RAISE POTENTIAL RED FLAGS TO ITS ATTENTION. THE FIRM'S INVESTIGATIONS OF THOSE RED FLAGS DETECTED BY ITS CLEARING FIRM WERE ALSO
HANDLED INADEQUATELY. THE FIRM'S 2011 AML COMPLIANCE PROGRAM INDEPENDENT 2011 TEST WAS NOT ADEQUATE AS THE PERSON CONDUCTING
THE TEST DID NOT TAKE APPROPRIATE STEPS TO AUDIT FOR DEFICIENCIES IN THE SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY MONITORING PROGRAM. THE FINDINGS ALSO

STATED THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO HAVE A REASONABLE SUPERVISORY SYSTEM TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 5 OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF
1933. THE FIRM FAILED TO CONDUCT A REASONABLE SEARCHING INQUIRY INTO THE TRADABILITY OF THE SECURITIES BY NOT INDEPENDENTLY
CORROBORATING INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTATION OBTAINED THROUGH SOURCES AND THEREFORE FAILED TO EVIDENCE THAT AN ADEQUATE
INVESTIGATION WAS CONDUCTED BY A REGISTERED PRINCIPAL. THE FINDINGS ALSO INCLUDED THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO ENFORCE ITS OWN
INFORMATION BARRIERS PROCEDURES AND AS A RESULT, ALLOWED POTENTIALLY SUSPICIOUS TRANSACTIONS TO GO UNDETECTED, AND EMPLOYEES
WHO WERE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE PRIVY TO MATERIAL, NON-PUBLIC INFORMATION TO HAVE SUCH ACCESS WITHOUT FOLLOWING ITS OWN
PROCEDURES TO GIVE EMPLOYEES THAT ACCESS. FINRA FOUND THAT DUE TO ERRORS IN THE PROCESS OF TRANSFERRING REPRESENTATIVES AT A
NEW BRANCH TO THE FIRM, THE EMAILS OF THE REPRESENTATIVES LOCATED AT THAT BRANCH WERE NOT MAINTAINED AND PRESERVED BEFORE APRIL
13, 2012. IN ADDITION, DUE TO TECHNOLOGY LINKING ISSUES, THE FIRM FAILED TO MAINTAIN BUSINESS-RELATED EMAILS FOR REPRESENTATIVES
WHO USED THEIR PERSONAL EMAILS FOR BUSINESS PURPOSES, EVEN THOUGH THE FIRM WAS AWARE OF THE USE OF THE NON-FIRM EMAIL DOMAINS.
FINRA ALSO FOUND THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO ESTABLISH ACCOUNTS AND MAINTAIN ACCOUNT RECORDS FOR NEW CUSTOMERS INVESTING IN AN
OFFERING AND FAILED TO MAKE REASONABLE EFFORTS TO OBTAIN ADEQUATE INFORMATION IN REGARDS TO THOSE CUSTOMERS. IN ADDITION, FINRA
DETERMINED THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO HAVE A SYSTEM IN PLACE TO ENSURE THE SUITABILITY OF NON-TRADITIONAL EXCHANGE-TRADED FUNDS
(ETFS) AND LACKED TRAINING AND SUPERVISION OF THESE PRODUCTS AND TRANSACTIONS. THERE WERE OVER 100 NON-TRADITIONAL ETFS THAT
WERE HELD MORE THAN ONE TRADING DAY, YET THOSE TRANSACTIONS WERE NOT FLAGGED FOR REVIEW. THE FIRM INSUFFICIENTLY DOCUMENTED
THAT ADEQUATE DILIGENCE WAS CONDUCTED WITH RESPECT TO THE PRIVATE PLACEMENTS AND NON-TRADED REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS
(REITS). THE FIRM'S WSPS WERE INADEQUATE IN THAT THEY GENERICALLY REFERENCED CCO REVIEW, BUT FAILED TO IDENTIFY SPECIFIC STEPS TO
BE TAKEN AND DID NOT OUTLINE HOW THE FIRM WOULD DOCUMENT AND EVIDENCE THE DUE DILIGENCE. THE FIRM ALSO FAILED TO ESTABLISH AN
ADEQUATE SUPERVISORY SYSTEM FOR THE REVIEW OF ACTIVITY IN AN AVERAGE PRICE ACCOUNT, RESULTING IN NUMEROUS OPTIONS ACTIVITIES
OCCURRING IN UNAPPROVED ACCOUNTS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
02/03/2015
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 225,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
THE FIRM WAS CENSURED AND FINED $225,000.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
TO AVOID THE UNCERTAINTY AND COST ASSOCIATED WITH A HEARING AND IN AN EFFORT TO PUT THESE LEGACY ISSUES BEHIND US, WORLD EQUITY
GROUP PURSUED SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS AS SOON AS THEY WERE MADE AVAILABLE TO US. SINCE THESE ISSUES WERE RECOGNIZED BY WORLD
EQUITY GROUP, THE FIRM HAS RESTRUCTURED ITS COMPLIANCE AND SUPERVISION STAFF AND ADDED SOME KEY NEW HIRES WHICH BRING MULTIPLE
YEARS OF EXPERIENCE TO THE TEAM. THE FIRM HAS ALSO REWRITTEN CERTAIN SECTIONS OF ITS WSPS SO AS TO FURTHER STRENGTHEN ITS
PROCEDURES.
regulatory · block 11PDF pages 54–56
Regulator name — filed text
FINRA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 7,500.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS THAT IT FAILED TO REPORT TRANSACTIONS IN TRADE REPORTING AND COMPLIANCE ENGINE (TRACE)-ELIGIBLE SECURITIZED PRODUCTS TO TRACE WITHIN THE TIME REQUIRED BY FINRA RULE 6730

Sanction detail — filed text

THE FIRM WAS CENSURED AND FINED $7,500.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)

11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FINRA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Censure
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
09/25/2014
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
2013036895301
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other
Other Product Types: 
SECURITIZED PRODUCTS

7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS THAT IT FAILED TO
REPORT TRANSACTIONS IN TRADE REPORTING AND COMPLIANCE ENGINE (TRACE)-ELIGIBLE SECURITIZED PRODUCTS TO TRACE WITHIN THE TIME
REQUIRED BY FINRA RULE 6730
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
09/25/2014
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 7,500.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
THE FIRM WAS CENSURED AND FINED $7,500.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 12PDF pages 56–58
Regulator name — filed text
FINRA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 15,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

DURING THE REVIEW PERIOD, THE FIRM FAILED TO REPORT TO TRACE 83 TRANSACTIONS IN TRACE-ELIGIBLE CORPORATE DEBT SECURITIES WITHIN THE TIMEFRAME REQUIRED BY FINRA RULE 6730. THESE 83 REPORTS CONSTITUTED 7.2 PERCENT OF THE FIRM'S TOTAL TRACE-ELIGIBLE TRANSACTIONS IN CORPORATE DEBT SECURITIES TO BE REPORTED TO TRACE DURING THE REVIEW PERIOD.

Sanction detail — filed text

A CENSURE AND A FINE OF $15,000 FOR THE ABOVE TRACE REPORTING FINDINGS.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates

If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FINRA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
03/01/2017
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
20160488366-01
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Debt - Corporate
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
DURING THE REVIEW PERIOD, THE FIRM FAILED TO REPORT TO TRACE 83 TRANSACTIONS IN TRACE-ELIGIBLE CORPORATE DEBT SECURITIES WITHIN
THE TIMEFRAME REQUIRED BY FINRA RULE 6730. THESE 83 REPORTS CONSTITUTED 7.2 PERCENT OF THE FIRM'S TOTAL TRACE-ELIGIBLE
TRANSACTIONS IN CORPORATE DEBT SECURITIES TO BE REPORTED TO TRACE DURING THE REVIEW PERIOD.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
03/01/2017
 Exact
 Explanation

If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 15,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
A CENSURE AND A FINE OF $15,000 FOR THE ABOVE TRACE REPORTING FINDINGS.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 13PDF pages 58–60
Regulator name — filed text
FINRA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 50,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)

Action status / disposition — filed text

TO AVOID THE UNCERTAINTY AND COST ASSOCIATED WITH A HEARING AND IN AN EFFORT TO PUT THIS LEGACY ISSUE BEHIND US, WORLD EQUITY GROUP PURSUED SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS AS SOON AS THEY WERE MADE AVAILABLE. SINCE THIS ISSUE WAS FIRST DISCOVERED BY WORLD EQUITY GROUP IN 2010, THE FIRM HAS RESTRUCTURED ITS COMPLIANCE AND SUPERVISORY STAFF, REWRITTEN CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF ITS WSPS, AND INCREASED EXCEPTION REPORTING TO FURTHER STRENGTHEN ITS COMPLIANCE PRACTICES.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS THAT IT FAILED TO ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN A SUPERVISORY SYSTEM AND ESTABLISH, MAINTAIN AND ENFORCE WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES REASONABLY DESIGNED TO IDENTIFY AND PREVENT POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE EXCESSIVE TRADING OF EQUITY SECURITIES. THE FINDINGS STATED THAT AS A RESULT OF ITS SUPERVISORY DEFICIENCIES, THE FIRM FAILED TO IDENTIFY A CERTAIN CUSTOMER'S ACCOUNT THAT EXHIBITED POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE EXCESSIVE TRADING ACTIVITY THAT SHOULD HAVE CAUSED FURTHER INVESTIGATION BY THE FIRM'S COMPLIANCE DEPARTMENT.

Sanction detail — filed text

THE FIRM WAS CENSURED AND FINED $50,000.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to

the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FINRA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
04/25/2016
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
2014039231401
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS THAT IT FAILED TO
ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN A SUPERVISORY SYSTEM AND ESTABLISH, MAINTAIN AND ENFORCE WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES REASONABLY
DESIGNED TO IDENTIFY AND PREVENT POTENTIALLY UNSUITABLE EXCESSIVE TRADING OF EQUITY SECURITIES. THE FINDINGS STATED THAT AS A
RESULT OF ITS SUPERVISORY DEFICIENCIES, THE FIRM FAILED TO IDENTIFY A CERTAIN CUSTOMER'S ACCOUNT THAT EXHIBITED POTENTIALLY
UNSUITABLE EXCESSIVE TRADING ACTIVITY THAT SHOULD HAVE CAUSED FURTHER INVESTIGATION BY THE FIRM'S COMPLIANCE DEPARTMENT.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
04/25/2016
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 50,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
THE FIRM WAS CENSURED AND FINED $50,000.

13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
TO AVOID THE UNCERTAINTY AND COST ASSOCIATED WITH A HEARING AND IN AN EFFORT TO PUT THIS LEGACY ISSUE BEHIND US, WORLD EQUITY
GROUP PURSUED SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS AS SOON AS THEY WERE MADE AVAILABLE. SINCE THIS ISSUE WAS FIRST DISCOVERED BY WORLD
EQUITY GROUP IN 2010, THE FIRM HAS RESTRUCTURED ITS COMPLIANCE AND SUPERVISORY STAFF, REWRITTEN CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF ITS WSPS,
AND INCREASED EXCEPTION REPORTING TO FURTHER STRENGTHEN ITS COMPLIANCE PRACTICES.
regulatory · block 14PDF pages 60–61
Regulator name — filed text
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 250.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Settled

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE FIRM SELF-REPORTED TO THE NORTH CAROLINA INSURANCE DERPARTMENT UPON DISCOVERY THAT THE ORIGINAL ISSUE WAS A REPORTABLE EVENT ACCORDING TO THE STATES INSURANCE LAWS. SINCE IT WAS PAST THE 30 DAY REPORTING PERIOD, THE NORTH CAROLINA INSURANCE DEPARTMENT SENT THE FIRM A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (WHICH INCLUDED A STIPULATION THAT THE AGREEMENT WOULD HAVE THE FULL EFFECT OF THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER) AND ASSESSED A SMALL CIVIL FINE.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

THE FIRM DID NOT FILE A REPORTABLE EVENT TO THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE WITHIN THE REQUIRED TIME FRAME ACCORDING TO THEIR STATE STATUTES.

Sanction detail — filed text

THE $250.00 FINE WAS PAID ON 1/03/2018
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other

Other Sanctions: 
ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
01/03/2018
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE FIRM DID NOT FILE A REPORTABLE EVENT TO THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE WITHIN THE REQUIRED TIME FRAME ACCORDING
TO THEIR STATE STATUTES.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Settled
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
01/03/2018
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 250.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
THE $250.00 FINE WAS PAID ON 1/03/2018
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE FIRM SELF-REPORTED TO THE NORTH CAROLINA INSURANCE DERPARTMENT UPON DISCOVERY THAT THE ORIGINAL ISSUE WAS A REPORTABLE
EVENT ACCORDING TO THE STATES INSURANCE LAWS. SINCE IT WAS PAST THE 30 DAY REPORTING PERIOD, THE NORTH CAROLINA INSURANCE
DEPARTMENT SENT THE FIRM A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (WHICH INCLUDED A STIPULATION THAT THE AGREEMENT WOULD HAVE THE FULL EFFECT OF
THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER) AND ASSESSED A SMALL CIVIL FINE.
regulatory · block 15PDF pages 61–63
Regulator name — filed text
FINRA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 18,500.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE AWC WAS SIGNED BY FIRM PRESIDENT, RICH BABJAK, ON 10/09/2019 AND SIGNED AND ACCEPTED BY FINRA ON 10/18/2019.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

DURING THE PERIOD OF JULY 1, 2016 THROUGH DECEMBER 31,2016 (THE "REVIEW PERIOD"), WORLD EQUITY GROUP, INC. FAILED TO REPORT TO TRACE 197 TRANSACTIONS IN CORPORATE DEBT SECURITIES WITHIN THE TIME REQUIRED BY FINRA RULE 6730(A). WORLD EQUITY GROUP'S LATE REPORTING RESULTED FROM DELAYS CAUSED BY FIRM EMPLOYEES AND UNTIMELY AMENDMENTS OR CORRECTIONS MADE TO TRACE REPORTS PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED BY THE FIRM OR ITS CLEARING FIRM. WORLD EQUITY GROUP'S CONDUCT CONSTITUTES SEPARATE AND DISTINCT VIOLATIONS OF FINRA RULE 6730(A) AND A PATTERN AND PRACTICE OF LATE REPORTING WITHOUT EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES, IN VIOLATION OF FINRA RULE 2010.

Sanction detail — filed text

FINE OF $18,500 LEVIED AGAINST THE FIRM WAS PAID VIA CHECK #324321 MAILED ON 11/11/19 (THE ORIGINAL CHECK SENT IN LATE OCTOBER WAS LOST).
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)

11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FINRA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Censure
Other Sanctions: 
AND FINE OF $18,500.
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
10/18/2019
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
20160520726-01
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Debt - Corporate
Other Product Types: 

7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
DURING THE PERIOD OF JULY 1, 2016 THROUGH DECEMBER 31,2016 (THE "REVIEW PERIOD"), WORLD EQUITY GROUP, INC. FAILED TO REPORT TO
TRACE 197 TRANSACTIONS IN CORPORATE DEBT SECURITIES WITHIN THE TIME REQUIRED BY FINRA RULE 6730(A). WORLD EQUITY GROUP'S LATE
REPORTING RESULTED FROM DELAYS CAUSED BY FIRM EMPLOYEES AND UNTIMELY AMENDMENTS OR CORRECTIONS MADE TO TRACE REPORTS
PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED BY THE FIRM OR ITS CLEARING FIRM. WORLD EQUITY GROUP'S CONDUCT CONSTITUTES SEPARATE AND DISTINCT VIOLATIONS
OF FINRA RULE 6730(A) AND A PATTERN AND PRACTICE OF LATE REPORTING WITHOUT EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES, IN VIOLATION OF FINRA RULE
2010.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
10/18/2019
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 18,500.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
FINE OF $18,500 LEVIED AGAINST THE FIRM WAS PAID VIA CHECK #324321 MAILED ON 11/11/19 (THE ORIGINAL CHECK SENT IN LATE
OCTOBER WAS LOST).
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE AWC WAS SIGNED BY FIRM PRESIDENT, RICH BABJAK, ON 10/09/2019 AND SIGNED AND ACCEPTED BY FINRA ON 10/18/2019.

* Metrics are based on the latest available data, including Form ADV filings, brochures, and relationship summaries pulled from the SEC IAPD, and may be subject to change. Learn what is included in the Rialytix data. Please refer to the firm's official disclosures for the most accurate information using their CRD number. This is not investment advice.