Assets under management Growth by Quarter
Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.
Private Funds
Private funds reported by Madison Avenue Securities, LLC
Employee Growth by Quarter
Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.
Historical AUM and employee figures reflect available SEC Form ADV filings under this CRD. Filing gaps may reflect registration status changes, dormant periods, state registration periods, firm restructuring, or other reporting changes. Rialytix does not interpolate missing periods.
Ownership
Reported direct and indirect ownership ranges
Reported ownership ranges
Highlighted bands show the percentage range reported in Form ADV.
Bars represent the reported range at that individual ownership step, not an estimated percentage of the advisory firm. Indirect relationships may refer to intermediate entities rather than directly to Madison Avenue Securities, LLC.
Reported ownership and control details
Form ADV · Filing date 2026-09-03 · Schedules A and B
| # | Owner / person & role | Interest in entity | Reported interest | Control person | Title / status acquired | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MARTIN WILLIAM MCNEESPRESIDENTIndividual | MADISON AVENUE SECURITIES, LLC | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | PRESIDENT09/2017 | Schedule APDF page 37 |
| 2 | KT EQUITY PARTNERS II, LLCDIRECT OWNERDomestic entity | MADISON AVENUE SECURITIES, LLC | 75% or moreCode E | Yes | DIRECT OWNER02/2015 | Schedule APDF page 37 |
| 3 | DAVID JAMES CALLANANMANAGERIndividual | MADISON AVENUE SECURITIES, LLC | Less than 5%Code NA | No | MANAGER03/2015 | Schedule APDF page 37 |
| 4 | MELISSA KAY PIERSONCHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICERIndividual | MADISON AVENUE SECURITIES, LLC | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER04/2025 | Schedule APDF page 37 |
| 5 | VILAYPHONE FIXSENCHIEF OPERATING OFFICERIndividual | MADISON AVENUE SECURITIES, LLC | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER04/2025 | Schedule APDF page 37 |
| 6 | SANDRA ANN WOODSFINOPIndividual | MADISON AVENUE SECURITIES, LLC | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | FINOP10/2025 | Schedule APDF page 37 |
| 7 | DDC HOLDINGS, LLCINDIRECT OWNERDomestic entity | KT EQUITY PARTNERS II, LLC | 75% or moreCode E | No | INDIRECT OWNER12/2016 | Schedule BPDF page 38 |
| 8 | DAVID JAMES CALLANANLLC MEMBERIndividual | DDC HOLDINGS, LLC | 50% to less than 75%Code D | No | LLC MEMBER12/2016 | Schedule BPDF page 38 |
| 9 | CODY GRANT FOSTERLLC MEMBERIndividual | DDC HOLDINGS, LLC | 50% to less than 75%Code D | No | LLC MEMBER12/2016 | Schedule BPDF page 38 |
Less than 5% may include zero. Code F identifies a role without specifying a percentage. Reported interests may overlap and may not include every owner. Total indirect ownership is not calculated.
Compliance & Disclosures
Filing dated 9/3/2026 9:28:33 AM
Responses were selected by the RIA in its filing. Questions are shortened for readability; “you” refers to the reporting firm, and some questions also cover advisory affiliates.
AFelonies2 Yes
In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:
- A1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a felony?Yes
- A2Been charged with a felony?Yes
BMisdemeanors2 No
In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:
- B1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a misdemeanor involving investments, an investment-related business, fraud, false statements or omissions, wrongful taking of property, bribery, perjury, forgery, counterfeiting, or extortion?No
- B2Been charged with a misdemeanor of the kind listed above?No
CSEC or CFTC actions3 Yes2 No
Has the SEC or CFTC ever:
- C1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
- C2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated SEC or CFTC regulations or statutes?Yes
- C3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- C4Entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?Yes
- C5Imposed a civil money penalty on you or an advisory affiliate, or ordered you or an advisory affiliate to cease and desist from any activity?Yes
DOther regulatory actions3 Yes2 No
Has any other federal regulatory agency, state regulatory agency, or foreign financial regulatory authority ever:
- D1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission, or was dishonest, unfair, or unethical?Yes
- D2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related regulations or statutes?Yes
- D3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- D4In the past ten years, entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?Yes
- D5Denied, suspended, or revoked your or an advisory affiliate’s registration or license, or otherwise prevented association with an investment-related business or restricted activities?No
ESelf-regulatory organization actions2 Yes2 No
Has a self-regulatory organization or commodities exchange ever:
- E1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?Yes
- E2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated its rules, other than a violation designated as a minor rule violation under an SEC-approved plan?Yes
- E3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- E4Disciplined you or an advisory affiliate by expulsion, suspension, barring association with other members, or otherwise restricting activities?No
FProfessional authorizations1 No
- FHas an authorization to act as an attorney, accountant, or federal contractor granted to you or an advisory affiliate ever been revoked or suspended?No
GPending regulatory proceedings1 No
- GAre you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a regulatory proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of C, D, or E?No
HCivil judicial actions and proceedings4 No
(1) Court actions
Has a domestic or foreign court:
- H(1)(a)In the past ten years, enjoined you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
- H(1)(b)Found that you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related statutes or regulations?No
- H(1)(c)Dismissed, pursuant to a settlement agreement, an investment-related civil action brought against you or an advisory affiliate by a state or foreign financial regulatory authority?No
(2) Pending civil proceedings
- H(2)Are you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a civil proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of H(1)?No
Additional DRP filings 10 source blocks
Verbatim excerpts from supporting DRP filings, which may concern the firm or advisory affiliates. Amounts retain their filed labels; no total or attribution is inferred.
criminal · block 1PDF pages 38–39
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.A. or 11.B. of Form ADV. Criminal Check item(s) being responded to: 11.A(1) 11.A(2) 11.B(1) 11.B(2) Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. Multiple counts of the same charge arising out of the same event(s) should be reported on the same DRP. Unrelated criminal actions, including separate cases arising out of the same event, must be reported on separate DRPs. Use this DRP to report all charges arising out of the same event. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to the items listed above. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE CRD Number: 2057790 This advisory affiliate is a Firm an Individual Registered: Yes No Name: HOLT, TIMOTHY, HAROLD (For individuals, Last, First, Middle) This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. If charge(s) were brought against an organization over which you or an advisory affiliate exercise(d) control: Enter organization name, whether or not the organization was an investment-related business and your or the advisory affiliate's position, title, or relationship. 2. Formal Charge(s) were brought in: (include name of Federal, Military, State or Foreign Court, Location of Court - City or County and State or Country, Docket/Case number). 3. Event Disclosure Detail (Use this for both organizational and individual charges.) A. Date First Charged (MM/DD/YYYY): Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: B. Event Disclosure Detail (include Charge(s)/Charge Description(s), and for each charge provide: (1) number of counts, (2) felony or misdemeanor, (3) plea for each charge, and (4) product type if charge is investment-related). C. Did any of the Charge(s) within the Event involve a felony? Yes No D. Current status of the Event? Pending On Appeal Final E. Event Status Date (complete unless status is Pending) (MM/DD/YYYY): Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Disposition Disclosure Detail: Include for each charge (a) Disposition Type (e.g., convicted, acquitted, dismissed, pretrial, etc.), (b) Date, (c) Sentence/Penalty, (d) Duration (if sentence - suspension, probation, etc.), (e) Start Date of Penalty, (f) Penalty/Fine Amount, and (g) Date Paid. 5. Provide a brief summary of circumstances leading to the charge(s) as well as the disposition. Include the relevant dates when the conduct which was the subject of the charge(s) occurred. (Your response must fit within the space provided.)
criminal · block 2PDF pages 39–41
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.A. or 11.B. of Form ADV. Criminal Check item(s) being responded to: 11.A(1) 11.A(2) 11.B(1) 11.B(2) Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. Multiple counts of the same charge arising out of the same event(s) should be reported on the same DRP. Unrelated criminal actions, including separate cases arising out of the same event, must be reported on separate DRPs. Use this DRP to report all charges arising out of the same event. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to the items listed above. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE CRD Number: 6294723 This advisory affiliate is a Firm an Individual Registered: Yes No Name: MCBRIDE, GREGORY JOSEPH (For individuals, Last, First, Middle) This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. If charge(s) were brought against an organization over which you or an advisory affiliate exercise(d) control: Enter organization name, whether or not the organization was an investment-related business and your or the advisory affiliate's position, title, or relationship. 2. Formal Charge(s) were brought in: (include name of Federal, Military, State or Foreign Court, Location of Court - City or County and State or Country, Docket/Case number). 3. Event Disclosure Detail (Use this for both organizational and individual charges.) A. Date First Charged (MM/DD/YYYY): Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: B. Event Disclosure Detail (include Charge(s)/Charge Description(s), and for each charge provide: (1) number of counts, (2) felony or misdemeanor, (3) plea for each charge, and (4) product type if charge is investment-related). C. Did any of the Charge(s) within the Event involve a felony? Yes No D. Current status of the Event? Pending On Appeal Final E. Event Status Date (complete unless status is Pending) (MM/DD/YYYY): Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Disposition Disclosure Detail: Include for each charge (a) Disposition Type (e.g., convicted, acquitted, dismissed, pretrial, etc.), (b) Date, (c) Sentence/Penalty, (d) Duration (if sentence - suspension, probation, etc.), (e) Start Date of Penalty, (f) Penalty/Fine Amount, and (g) Date Paid. 5. Provide a brief summary of circumstances leading to the charge(s) as well as the disposition. Include the relevant dates when the conduct which was the subject of the charge(s) occurred. (Your response must fit within the space provided.)
regulatory · block 1PDF pages 41–42
- Regulator name — filed text
- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 150,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Decision & Order of Offer of Settlement
Action status / disposition — filed text
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, MAS AGREED TO CERTAIN UNDERTAKING, A CEASE AND DESIST ORDER, A CENSURE, AND THE PAYMENT OF THE FAIR FUNDS (DESCRIBED ABOVE) OUT OF THE ESCROW ACCOUNT TO THE APPROPRIATE PARTIES IN CONFORMITY WITH ORDER.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
THE SEC ALLEGED THAT MADISON AVENUE SECURITIES (MAS) DID NOT ADEQUATELY DISCLOSE THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST THAT EXISTED WHEN IT RECOMMENDED SWEEP ACCOUNT MONEY MARKET FUND OPTIONS TO ITS ADVISORY CLIENTS AND CERTAIN MUTUAL FUNDS, INCLUDING NO TRANSACTION FEE (NTF) MUTUAL FUNDS, THAT PAID A 12B-1 FEE OR A SHAREHOLDER SERVICE FEE, WHICH IN SOME CASES, WERE NOT REBATED BACK TO THE CLIENTS DUE TO AN OPERATIONAL ERROR.
Sanction detail — filed text
ON 6/8/2022, MAS DEPOSITED A TOTAL OF $803,173.69, WHICH INCLUDED DISGORGEMENT OF $579,523.76 PREJUDGMENT INTEREST OF $73,649.93 AND CIVIL MONEY PENALTY OF $150,000 (THE "FAIR FUNDS") IN AN ESCROW ACCOUNT AT A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION NOT UNACCEPTABLE TO THE SEC FOR DISTRIBUTION TO AFFECTED CLIENTS AND THE SEC IN CONFORMITY WITH THE ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE No Information Filed This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 2. Principal Sanction: Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s) Other Sanctions: CEASE AND DESIST, CENSURE, DISGORGEMENT, UNDERTAKING 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 07/06/2021 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: DATE OF FIRM RESPONSE TO SEC 4. Docket/Case Number: 3-20872 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: Mutual Fund(s) Other Product Types: CASH SWEEP 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): THE SEC ALLEGED THAT MADISON AVENUE SECURITIES (MAS) DID NOT ADEQUATELY DISCLOSE THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST THAT EXISTED WHEN IT RECOMMENDED SWEEP ACCOUNT MONEY MARKET FUND OPTIONS TO ITS ADVISORY CLIENTS AND CERTAIN MUTUAL FUNDS, INCLUDING NO TRANSACTION FEE (NTF) MUTUAL FUNDS, THAT PAID A 12B-1 FEE OR A SHAREHOLDER SERVICE FEE, WHICH IN SOME CASES, WERE NOT REBATED BACK TO THE CLIENTS DUE TO AN OPERATIONAL ERROR. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Decision & Order of Offer of Settlement 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 05/31/2022 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 150,000.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: UNDERTAKINGS Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: ON 6/8/2022, MAS DEPOSITED A TOTAL OF $803,173.69, WHICH INCLUDED DISGORGEMENT OF $579,523.76 PREJUDGMENT INTEREST OF $73,649.93 AND CIVIL MONEY PENALTY OF $150,000 (THE "FAIR FUNDS") IN AN ESCROW ACCOUNT AT A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION NOT UNACCEPTABLE TO THE SEC FOR DISTRIBUTION TO AFFECTED CLIENTS AND THE SEC IN CONFORMITY WITH THE ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER. 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, MAS AGREED TO CERTAIN UNDERTAKING, A CEASE AND DESIST ORDER, A CENSURE, AND THE PAYMENT OF THE FAIR FUNDS (DESCRIBED ABOVE) OUT OF THE ESCROW ACCOUNT TO THE APPROPRIATE PARTIES IN CONFORMITY WITH ORDER.
regulatory · block 2PDF pages 42–44
- Regulator name — filed text
- STATE OF INDIANA, OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE, SECURITIES DIVISION.
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 1,500.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Consent
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
THE INDIANA SECRETARY OF STATE, SECURITIES DIVISION ALLEGES THAT FROM APPROXIMATELY AUGUST TO NOVEMBER 2010, MADISON AVENUE SECURITIES, INC. ("MAS") ENGAGED IN A DISHONEST AND UNETHICAL PRACTICE BY FAILING TO SUPERVISE AGENT KEITH D. ROBINSON ("ROBINSON") WHEN IT APPROVED THE ADVERTISEMENTS AND/OR INVITATIONS OF ROBINSON FOR SEMINARS TO POTENTIAL CLIENTS WHICH STATED THAT ROBINSON WAS A "SEASONED INVESTMENT ADVISOR," ALTHOUGH ROBINSON HAS NEVER BEEN REGISTERED AS AN INVESTMENT ADVISER OR INVESTMENT ADVISER REPRESENTATIVE IN THE STATE OF INDIANA IN VIOLATION OF IND. CODE § 2319412(D)(13) AND 710 IAC 4101(22).
Sanction detail — filed text
MAS PAID A CIVIL PENALTY OF $1,500 ON OR ABOUT JUNE 22, 2011.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page.
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name).
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances:
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
Yes
No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1. Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC
Other Federal
State
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO)
STATE OF INDIANA, OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE, SECURITIES DIVISION.
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions:
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY):
06/22/2011
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
11-0162 CA
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other
Other Product Types:
UNKNOWN
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE INDIANA SECRETARY OF STATE, SECURITIES DIVISION ALLEGES THAT FROM APPROXIMATELY AUGUST TO NOVEMBER 2010, MADISON AVENUE
SECURITIES, INC. ("MAS") ENGAGED IN A DISHONEST AND UNETHICAL PRACTICE BY FAILING TO SUPERVISE AGENT KEITH D. ROBINSON ("ROBINSON")
WHEN IT APPROVED THE ADVERTISEMENTS AND/OR INVITATIONS OF ROBINSON FOR SEMINARS TO POTENTIAL CLIENTS WHICH STATED THAT
ROBINSON WAS A "SEASONED INVESTMENT ADVISOR," ALTHOUGH ROBINSON HAS NEVER BEEN REGISTERED AS AN INVESTMENT ADVISER OR
INVESTMENT ADVISER REPRESENTATIVE IN THE STATE OF INDIANA IN VIOLATION OF IND. CODE § 2319412(D)(13) AND 710 IAC 4101(22).
8.
Current Status?
Pending
On Appeal
Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
06/22/2011
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 1,500.00
Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
Disgorgement/Restitution
Censure
Cease and Desist/Injunction
Bar
Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived:
MAS PAID A CIVIL PENALTY OF $1,500 ON OR ABOUT JUNE 22, 2011.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).regulatory · block 3PDF pages 44–46
- Regulator name — filed text
- FINRA
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 12,500.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
FINRA RULE 2010, NASD RULES 2110, 3010, 3040(C), 3110: A REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE FIRM PARTICIPATED IN PRIVATE SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS WHEN PARTICIPATING IN THE OFFER AND SALE OF PRIVATE PLACEMENT OFFERINGS. THE FIRM FAILED TO RECORD THE TRANSACTIONS OF THE PRIVATE PLACEMENT OFFERINGS ON ITS BOOKS AND RECORDS AND FAILED TO ADEQUATELY SUPERVISE HIS CONDUCT WITH RESPECT TO THESE PRIVATE SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS.
Sanction detail — filed text
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS, THEREFORE THE FIRM IS CENSURED AND FINED $12,500.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE No Information Filed This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) FINRA 2. Principal Sanction: Other Other Sanctions: N/A 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 06/20/2013 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: 2011028857601 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: Other Other Product Types: PRIVATE SECURITIES 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): FINRA RULE 2010, NASD RULES 2110, 3010, 3040(C), 3110: A REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE FIRM PARTICIPATED IN PRIVATE SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS WHEN PARTICIPATING IN THE OFFER AND SALE OF PRIVATE PLACEMENT OFFERINGS. THE FIRM FAILED TO RECORD THE TRANSACTIONS OF THE PRIVATE PLACEMENT OFFERINGS ON ITS BOOKS AND RECORDS AND FAILED TO ADEQUATELY SUPERVISE HIS CONDUCT WITH RESPECT TO THESE PRIVATE SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC) 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 06/20/2013 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 12,500.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS, THEREFORE THE FIRM IS CENSURED AND FINED $12,500. 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 4PDF pages 46–48
- Regulator name — filed text
- FINRA
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 75,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS THAT IT FAILED TO HAVE EITHER WRITTEN PROCEDURES OR A SUPERVISORY SYSTEM IN PLACE PERTAINING TO THE CREATION AND DISSEMINATION OF CONSOLIDATED REPORTS. THE FINDINGS STATED THAT 39 OF THE FIRM'S APPROXIMATELY 140 REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES USED MULTIPLE SYSTEMS TO PREPARE AND DISTRIBUTE CONSOLIDATED REPORTS TO CUSTOMERS. TEMPLATES USED BY 21 OF THE REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES ALLOWED FOR MANUAL ENTRY OF ACCOUNT INFORMATION. THE FIRM DISTRIBUTED APPROXIMATELY 6,800 CONSOLIDATED REPORTS TO CUSTOMERS, AND APPROXIMATELY 4,500 OF THOSE CONSOLIDATED REPORTS WERE GENERATED USING TEMPLATES THAT ALLOWED FOR MANUAL ENTRIES. ALTHOUGH MOST OF THE CONSOLIDATED REPORTS CONTAINED ADEQUATE DISCLOSURE, THE TEMPLATES USED BY 7 REPRESENTATIVES DID NOT. THE FIRM IMPLEMENTED PROCEDURES RELATING TO CONSOLIDATED REPORTS THAT REQUIRED REPRESENTATIVES TO, AMONG OTHER ITEMS, SUBMIT TEMPLATES TO THE COMPLIANCE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO USE AND PROVIDED FOR THE REVIEW OF CONSOLIDATED REPORTS DURING ANNUAL BRANCH EXAMINATIONS. THESE PROCEDURES, HOWEVER, WERE NOT CONSISTENTLY ENFORCED AND WERE INADEQUATE IN THAT THEY DID NOT PROVIDE FOR VERIFICATION OF MANUALLY ENTERED ACCOUNT ASSETS OR VALUATION INFORMATION. FURTHER, APPROXIMATELY 2,300 CONSOLIDATED REPORTS WERE NEITHER REVIEWED NOR RETAINED BY THE FIRM.
Sanction detail — filed text
THE FIRM WAS CENSURED AND FINED $75,000 AND THE FINE WAS PAID IN FULL ON 12/5/2016.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE No Information Filed This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) FINRA 2. Principal Sanction: Other Other Sanctions: N/A 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 12/05/2016 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: 2015043246601 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: No Product Other Product Types: 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS THAT IT FAILED TO HAVE EITHER WRITTEN PROCEDURES OR A SUPERVISORY SYSTEM IN PLACE PERTAINING TO THE CREATION AND DISSEMINATION OF CONSOLIDATED REPORTS. THE FINDINGS STATED THAT 39 OF THE FIRM'S APPROXIMATELY 140 REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES USED MULTIPLE SYSTEMS TO PREPARE AND DISTRIBUTE CONSOLIDATED REPORTS TO CUSTOMERS. TEMPLATES USED BY 21 OF THE REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES ALLOWED FOR MANUAL ENTRY OF ACCOUNT INFORMATION. THE FIRM DISTRIBUTED APPROXIMATELY 6,800 CONSOLIDATED REPORTS TO CUSTOMERS, AND APPROXIMATELY 4,500 OF THOSE CONSOLIDATED REPORTS WERE GENERATED USING TEMPLATES THAT ALLOWED FOR MANUAL ENTRIES. ALTHOUGH MOST OF THE CONSOLIDATED REPORTS CONTAINED ADEQUATE DISCLOSURE, THE TEMPLATES USED BY 7 REPRESENTATIVES DID NOT. THE FIRM IMPLEMENTED PROCEDURES RELATING TO CONSOLIDATED REPORTS THAT REQUIRED REPRESENTATIVES TO, AMONG OTHER ITEMS, SUBMIT TEMPLATES TO THE COMPLIANCE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO USE AND PROVIDED FOR THE REVIEW OF CONSOLIDATED REPORTS DURING ANNUAL BRANCH EXAMINATIONS. THESE PROCEDURES, HOWEVER, WERE NOT CONSISTENTLY ENFORCED AND WERE INADEQUATE IN THAT THEY DID NOT PROVIDE FOR VERIFICATION OF MANUALLY ENTERED ACCOUNT ASSETS OR VALUATION INFORMATION. FURTHER, APPROXIMATELY 2,300 CONSOLIDATED REPORTS WERE NEITHER REVIEWED NOR RETAINED BY THE FIRM. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC) 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 12/05/2016 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 75,000.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: THE FIRM WAS CENSURED AND FINED $75,000 AND THE FINE WAS PAID IN FULL ON 12/5/2016. 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided).
Show 4 more source blocks
regulatory · block 5PDF pages 48–50
- Regulator name — filed text
- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 150,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Decision & Order of Offer of Settlement
Action status / disposition — filed text
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, MAS AGREED TO CERTAIN UNDERTAKING, A CEASE AND DESIST ORDER, A CENSURE AND THE PAYMENT OF THE FAIR FUNDS (DESCRIBED ABOVE) OUT OF THE ESCROW ACCOUNT TO THE APPROPRIATE PARTIES IN CONFORMITY WITH THE ORDER.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
THE SEC ALLEGED THAT MADISON AVENUE SECURITIES (MAS) DID NOT ADEQUATELY DISCLOSE THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST THAT EXISTED WHEN IT RECOMMENDED SWEEP ACCOUNT MONEY MARKET FUND OPTIONS TO ITS ADVISORY CLIENTS AND CERTAIN MUTUAL FUNDS, INCLUDING NO TRANSACTION FEE (NTF) MUTUAL FUNDS, THAT PAID A 12B-1 FEE OR A SHAREHOLDER SERVICE FEE, WHICH, IN SOME CASES, WERE NOT REBATED BACK TO THE CLIENTS DUE TO AN OPERATIONAL ERROR.
Sanction detail — filed text
ON 6/8/2022, MAS DEPOSITED A TOTAL OF $803,173.69, WHICH INCLUDED DISGORGEMENT OF $579,523.76, PREJUDGMENT INTEREST OF $73,649.93, AND CIVIL MONEY PENALTY OF $150,000 (THE "FAIR FUNDS") IN AN ESCROW ACCOUNT AT A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION NOT UNACCEPTABLE TO THE SEC FOR DISTRIBUTION TO AFFECTED CLIENTS AND THE SEC IN CONFORMITY WITH THE ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE No Information Filed This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 2. Principal Sanction: Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s) Other Sanctions: CEASE AND DESIST, CENSURE, DISGORGEMENT, UNDERTAKING 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 07/02/2021 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: APPROXIMATE DATE OF RESPONSE TO SEC REQUEST 4. Docket/Case Number: 3-20872 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: Mutual Fund(s) Other Product Types: CASH SWEEP 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): THE SEC ALLEGED THAT MADISON AVENUE SECURITIES (MAS) DID NOT ADEQUATELY DISCLOSE THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST THAT EXISTED WHEN IT RECOMMENDED SWEEP ACCOUNT MONEY MARKET FUND OPTIONS TO ITS ADVISORY CLIENTS AND CERTAIN MUTUAL FUNDS, INCLUDING NO TRANSACTION FEE (NTF) MUTUAL FUNDS, THAT PAID A 12B-1 FEE OR A SHAREHOLDER SERVICE FEE, WHICH, IN SOME CASES, WERE NOT REBATED BACK TO THE CLIENTS DUE TO AN OPERATIONAL ERROR. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Decision & Order of Offer of Settlement 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 05/31/2022 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 150,000.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: UNDERTAKINGS Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: ON 6/8/2022, MAS DEPOSITED A TOTAL OF $803,173.69, WHICH INCLUDED DISGORGEMENT OF $579,523.76, PREJUDGMENT INTEREST OF $73,649.93, AND CIVIL MONEY PENALTY OF $150,000 (THE "FAIR FUNDS") IN AN ESCROW ACCOUNT AT A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION NOT UNACCEPTABLE TO THE SEC FOR DISTRIBUTION TO AFFECTED CLIENTS AND THE SEC IN CONFORMITY WITH THE ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER. 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, MAS AGREED TO CERTAIN UNDERTAKING, A CEASE AND DESIST ORDER, A CENSURE AND THE PAYMENT OF THE FAIR FUNDS (DESCRIBED ABOVE) OUT OF THE ESCROW ACCOUNT TO THE APPROPRIATE PARTIES IN CONFORMITY WITH THE ORDER.
regulatory · block 6PDF pages 50–52
- Regulator name — filed text
- FINRA
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 50,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Action status / disposition — filed text
THIS MATTER INVOLVED 13 ACCOUNTS (THE FIRM HAD OVER 15,000 ACCOUNTS AT THE TIME OF THE ACTIVITY) AND TRANSACTIONS THAT TOOK PLACE MORE THAN FIVE YEARS AGO. AS DESCRIBED IN THE AWC, THE FIRM HAS SINCE TAKEN CORRECTIVE ACTION RELATED TO ITS SUPERVISORY SYSTEM REGARDING MUTUAL FUND SALES.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS THAT IT FAILED TO ESTABLISH, MAINTAIN, AND ENFORCE A SUPERVISORY SYSTEM, INCLUDING WSPS, REASONABLY DESIGNED TO SUPERVISE MUTUAL FUND TRANSACTIONS THAT THE FIRM'S REPRESENTATIVES EFFECTED THROUGH ITS ELECTRONIC ORDER ENTRY SYSTEM TO CONFIRM THE SUITABILITY OF THE TRANSACTIONS REGARDING POTENTIAL AVAILABLE SALES CHARGE DISCOUNTS. THE FINDINGS STATED THAT THE FIRM USED A PROCESS CALLED A T- PLUS 1 REVIEW WHERE FIRM PRINCIPALS MANUALLY REVIEWED MUTUAL FUND TRANSACTIONS SUBMITTED THROUGH THE ELECTRONIC ORDER ENTRY SYSTEM THE DAY AFTER THE TRANSACTION. THE FIRM USED AN ELECTRONIC TRADE MONITORING PROGRAM FOR THE FIRM'S SUITABILITY REVIEW OF TRANSACTIONS ENTERED INTO THE ELECTRONIC ORDER ENTRY SYSTEM, ALONG WITH A PRINCIPAL'S REVIEW OF THE TRADE MONITORING PROGRAM'S SURVEILLANCE ALERTS, INCLUDING FOR "FUND FAMILY DIVERSIFICATION." NEITHER THE T-PLUS-1 OR SURVEILLANCE ALERT REVIEW PROCESS ALLOWED FOR REASONABLE REVIEW OF THE SUITABILITY OF CUSTOMERS' PURCHASES OF MUTUAL FUNDS IN MULTIPLE DIFFERENT MUTUAL FUND FAMILIES, EITHER SIMULTANEOUSLY OR SEQUENTIALLY, RESULTING IN MISSED SALES CHARGE DISCOUNTS. NEITHER PROCESS INCLUDED A REVIEW OF CUSTOMERS' MUTUAL FUNDS HOLDINGS PURCHASED AWAY FROM THE FIRM THAT COULD HAVE BEEN USED TO ACHIEVE SALES CHARGE DISCOUNTS THROUGH A RIGHT OF ACCUMULATION. FURTHER, 12 FIRM CUSTOMER HOUSEHOLDS PURCHASED MUTUAL FUNDS IN MULTIPLE DIFFERENT MUTUAL FUND FAMILIES, EITHER SIMULTANEOUSLY OR SEQUENTIALLY, IN TRANSACTIONS SUBMITTED THROUGH THE THE ELECTRONIC ORDER ENTRY SYSTEM. THESE CUSTOMERS' SALES CHARGES WOULD HAVE BEEN REDUCED HAD THEY PURCHASED MUTUAL FUNS ALL WITHIN ONE MUTUAL FUND FAMILY, RATHER THAN AMONG SEVER FUND FAMILIES. IN ADDITION TO THOSE CUSTOMERS, ANOTHER CUSTOMER SIMULTANEOUSLY PURCHASED SIX MUTUAL FUNDS IN FIVE DIFFERENT MUTUAL FUND FAMILIES AT THE RECOMMENDATION OF A FIRM REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVE IN TRANSACTIONS SUBMITTED VIA THE FIRM'S ELECTRONIC ORDER ENTRY SYSTEM. AT THE TIME, THE CUSTOMER ALREADY HELD MUTUAL FUNDS AWAY FROM THE FIRM. ALTHOUGH THE STRATEGY INVOLVED HIGHLY-RATED FUNDS, THE CUSTOMER'S SALES CHARGES WOULD HAVE BEEN REDUCED IF HE HAD PURCHASED MUTUAL FUNDS IN ONE MUTUAL FUND FAMILY AND REDUCED EVEN FURTHER IF HE HAD INVESTED IN THE MUTUAL FUND FAMILY OF THE FUNDS HE HELD AWAY FROM THE FIRM. THIS CUSTOMER WAS COMPENSATED FOR THE MISSED SALES CHARGES DISCOUNTS THROUGH A SEPARATE SETTLEMENT. THE FIRM HAS SINCE REVISED ITS SUPERVISORY SYSTEM, INCLUDING WSPS, REGARDING MUTUAL FUND SUPERVISION, INCLUDING FURTHER DESCRIBING THE T- PLUS-1 AND SURVEILLANCE ALERT REVIEW PROCESSES FOR MUTUAL FUND TRANSACTIONS.
Sanction detail — filed text
THE FIRM WAS CENSURED, FINED $50,000 AND ORDERED TO PAY $63,296, PLUS INTEREST, IN RESTITUTION TO CUSTOMERS.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE No Information Filed This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) FINRA 2. Principal Sanction: Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s) Other Sanctions: CENSURE AND RESTITUTION PLUS INTEREST. 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 05/01/2023 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: 2019061187802 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: Mutual Fund(s) Other Product Types: 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS THAT IT FAILED TO ESTABLISH, MAINTAIN, AND ENFORCE A SUPERVISORY SYSTEM, INCLUDING WSPS, REASONABLY DESIGNED TO SUPERVISE MUTUAL FUND TRANSACTIONS THAT THE FIRM'S REPRESENTATIVES EFFECTED THROUGH ITS ELECTRONIC ORDER ENTRY SYSTEM TO CONFIRM THE SUITABILITY OF THE TRANSACTIONS REGARDING POTENTIAL AVAILABLE SALES CHARGE DISCOUNTS. THE FINDINGS STATED THAT THE FIRM USED A PROCESS CALLED A T- PLUS 1 REVIEW WHERE FIRM PRINCIPALS MANUALLY REVIEWED MUTUAL FUND TRANSACTIONS SUBMITTED THROUGH THE ELECTRONIC ORDER ENTRY SYSTEM THE DAY AFTER THE TRANSACTION. THE FIRM USED AN ELECTRONIC TRADE MONITORING PROGRAM FOR THE FIRM'S SUITABILITY REVIEW OF TRANSACTIONS ENTERED INTO THE ELECTRONIC ORDER ENTRY SYSTEM, ALONG WITH A PRINCIPAL'S REVIEW OF THE TRADE MONITORING PROGRAM'S SURVEILLANCE ALERTS, INCLUDING FOR "FUND FAMILY DIVERSIFICATION." NEITHER THE T-PLUS-1 OR SURVEILLANCE ALERT REVIEW PROCESS ALLOWED FOR REASONABLE REVIEW OF THE SUITABILITY OF CUSTOMERS' PURCHASES OF MUTUAL FUNDS IN MULTIPLE DIFFERENT MUTUAL FUND FAMILIES, EITHER SIMULTANEOUSLY OR SEQUENTIALLY, RESULTING IN MISSED SALES CHARGE DISCOUNTS. NEITHER PROCESS INCLUDED A REVIEW OF CUSTOMERS' MUTUAL FUNDS HOLDINGS PURCHASED AWAY FROM THE FIRM THAT COULD HAVE BEEN USED TO ACHIEVE SALES CHARGE DISCOUNTS THROUGH A RIGHT OF ACCUMULATION. FURTHER, 12 FIRM CUSTOMER HOUSEHOLDS PURCHASED MUTUAL FUNDS IN MULTIPLE DIFFERENT MUTUAL FUND FAMILIES, EITHER SIMULTANEOUSLY OR SEQUENTIALLY, IN TRANSACTIONS SUBMITTED THROUGH THE THE ELECTRONIC ORDER ENTRY SYSTEM. THESE CUSTOMERS' SALES CHARGES WOULD HAVE BEEN REDUCED HAD THEY PURCHASED MUTUAL FUNS ALL WITHIN ONE MUTUAL FUND FAMILY, RATHER THAN AMONG SEVER FUND FAMILIES. IN ADDITION TO THOSE CUSTOMERS, ANOTHER CUSTOMER SIMULTANEOUSLY PURCHASED SIX MUTUAL FUNDS IN FIVE DIFFERENT MUTUAL FUND FAMILIES AT THE RECOMMENDATION OF A FIRM REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVE IN TRANSACTIONS SUBMITTED VIA THE FIRM'S ELECTRONIC ORDER ENTRY SYSTEM. AT THE TIME, THE CUSTOMER ALREADY HELD MUTUAL FUNDS AWAY FROM THE FIRM. ALTHOUGH THE STRATEGY INVOLVED HIGHLY-RATED FUNDS, THE CUSTOMER'S SALES CHARGES WOULD HAVE BEEN REDUCED IF HE HAD PURCHASED MUTUAL FUNDS IN ONE MUTUAL FUND FAMILY AND REDUCED EVEN FURTHER IF HE HAD INVESTED IN THE MUTUAL FUND FAMILY OF THE FUNDS HE HELD AWAY FROM THE FIRM. THIS CUSTOMER WAS COMPENSATED FOR THE MISSED SALES CHARGES DISCOUNTS THROUGH A SEPARATE SETTLEMENT. THE FIRM HAS SINCE REVISED ITS SUPERVISORY SYSTEM, INCLUDING WSPS, REGARDING MUTUAL FUND SUPERVISION, INCLUDING FURTHER DESCRIBING THE T- PLUS-1 AND SURVEILLANCE ALERT REVIEW PROCESSES FOR MUTUAL FUND TRANSACTIONS. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC) 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 05/01/2023 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 50,000.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: PLUS INTEREST Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: THE FIRM WAS CENSURED, FINED $50,000 AND ORDERED TO PAY $63,296, PLUS INTEREST, IN RESTITUTION TO CUSTOMERS. 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). THIS MATTER INVOLVED 13 ACCOUNTS (THE FIRM HAD OVER 15,000 ACCOUNTS AT THE TIME OF THE ACTIVITY) AND TRANSACTIONS THAT TOOK PLACE MORE THAN FIVE YEARS AGO. AS DESCRIBED IN THE AWC, THE FIRM HAS SINCE TAKEN CORRECTIVE ACTION RELATED TO ITS SUPERVISORY SYSTEM REGARDING MUTUAL FUND SALES.
regulatory · block 7PDF pages 52–53
- Regulator name — filed text
- TEXAS STATE SECURITIES BOARD
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 20,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Order
Action status / disposition — filed text
NONE
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
SURING THE PERIOD 2014 THROUGH 2017, MADISON AVENUE SECURITIES, LLC FAILED TO ESTABLISH, MAINTAIN AND ENFORCE A SUPERVISORY SYSTEM TO SUPERVISE THE ACTIVITIES OF ITS AGENTS RELATING TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS. SPECIFICALLY, AFTER ADOPTING DIFFERENT BRANCH OFFICE SPECIFIC GUIDELINES FOR ONE FORM AGENT, THE FIRM DID NOT CONSISTENTLY APPLY AN ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENT ACCOUNT SCORE WORKSHEET, WHICH WAS USED TO ASSESS COMPLIANCE FOR PURCHASES OF ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENT SALES. THE FIRM ALSO FAILED TO CREATE A NEW TOOL TO MONITOR FOR THE BRANCH-OFFICE SPECIFIC COMPLIANCE OF ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENT SALES. PURSUANT TO SECTION 4007.106 (A)(3) OF THE TEXAS SECURITIES ACT, THE FIRM'S VIOLATIONS OF 115.10 OF THE BOARD RULES CONSTITUTE A BASIS FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AGAINST THE FIRM. IT WAS ORDERED THAT MADISON AVENUE SECURITIES, LLC PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $20,000 TO THE GENERAL FUND OF THE STATE OF TEXAS WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE ORDER. IT WAS ALSO ORDERED THAT MADISON AVENUE SECURITIES, LLC COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF AN UNDERTAKING WITH THE TEXAS STATE SECURITIES BOARD.
Sanction detail — filed text
NONE
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE No Information Filed This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) TEXAS STATE SECURITIES BOARD 2. Principal Sanction: Undertaking Other Sanctions: 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 06/30/2023 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: IC23-CAF-03 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): MADISON AVENUE SECURITIES, LLC 6. Principal Product Type: Other Other Product Types: ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): SURING THE PERIOD 2014 THROUGH 2017, MADISON AVENUE SECURITIES, LLC FAILED TO ESTABLISH, MAINTAIN AND ENFORCE A SUPERVISORY SYSTEM TO SUPERVISE THE ACTIVITIES OF ITS AGENTS RELATING TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS. SPECIFICALLY, AFTER ADOPTING DIFFERENT BRANCH OFFICE SPECIFIC GUIDELINES FOR ONE FORM AGENT, THE FIRM DID NOT CONSISTENTLY APPLY AN ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENT ACCOUNT SCORE WORKSHEET, WHICH WAS USED TO ASSESS COMPLIANCE FOR PURCHASES OF ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENT SALES. THE FIRM ALSO FAILED TO CREATE A NEW TOOL TO MONITOR FOR THE BRANCH-OFFICE SPECIFIC COMPLIANCE OF ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENT SALES. PURSUANT TO SECTION 4007.106 (A)(3) OF THE TEXAS SECURITIES ACT, THE FIRM'S VIOLATIONS OF 115.10 OF THE BOARD RULES CONSTITUTE A BASIS FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AGAINST THE FIRM. IT WAS ORDERED THAT MADISON AVENUE SECURITIES, LLC PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $20,000 TO THE GENERAL FUND OF THE STATE OF TEXAS WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE ORDER. IT WAS ALSO ORDERED THAT MADISON AVENUE SECURITIES, LLC COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF AN UNDERTAKING WITH THE TEXAS STATE SECURITIES BOARD. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Order 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 06/30/2023 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 20,000.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: UNDERTAKING Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: NONE 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). NONE
regulatory · block 8PDF pages 53–55
- Regulator name — filed text
- FINRA
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 125,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS THAT IT DISTRIBUTED OR MADE AVAILABLE TO CUSTOMERS CONSOLIDATED REPORTS CONTAINING INACCURATE INFORMATION, OR OMITTING MATERIAL INFORMATION, ABOUT WHETHER CERTAIN ASSETS WERE HELD AWAY FROM THE FIRM. THE FINDINGS STATED THAT THE FIRM ALLOWED ITS REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES TO GENERATE CONSOLIDATED REPORTS THROUGH AN ELECTRONIC PLATFORM, THEN DISTRIBUTE OR MAKE AVAILABLE THOSE REPORTS TO CUSTOMERS. PERSONNEL IN THE FIRM'S HOME OFFICE HANDLED MANUAL ENTRIES INTO THAT PLATFORM, BUT THEY WERE NOT REASONABLY TRAINED, RESULTING IN THOUSANDS OF MANUALLY ENTERED, HELD-AWAY ASSETS BEING NOT DESIGNATED AS HELD AWAY OR INACCURATELY DESIGNATED AS NOT HELD AWAY. THE FIRM DID NOT UPDATE AUTOMATED DATA FEEDS FROM SEVEN PRODUCT SPONSORS INTO ITS CONSOLIDATED REPORTING PLATFORM WHEN IT EXPANDED OFFERINGS OF THOSE SPONSORS' PRODUCTS, RESULTING IN THOUSANDS OF ASSETS NOT BEING CORRECTLY DESIGNATED AS HELD AWAY. IN ADDITION, MANY CONSOLIDATED REPORTS THAT INCLUDED HELD-AWAY ASSETS DID NOT DISCLOSE THAT THE HELD-AWAY ASSETS MAY NOT BE COVERED BY THE SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION (SIPC). THE COMMUNICATIONS THAT OMITTED INFORMATION ABOUT HELD-AWAY ASSETS AND SIPC COVERAGE DID NOT PROVIDE A SOUND BASIS TO EVALUATE THE FACTS CONCERNING CUSTOMER ASSETS. IN ADDITION, THE COMMUNICATIONS THAT INACCURATELY CATEGORIZED ASSETS AS NOT HELD AWAY WERE FALSE AND MISLEADING. THE FINDINGS ALSO STATED THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO MAINTAIN RECORDS OF WHICH CONSOLIDATED REPORTS WERE DISTRIBUTED OR MADE AVAILABLE TO CUSTOMERS. THE FINDINGS ALSO INCLUDED THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO DESIGN AND IMPLEMENT A REASONABLE SUPERVISORY SYSTEM TO REVIEW AND RETAIN CONSOLIDATED REPORTS. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE FIRM IMPLEMENTED PROCEDURES TO SUPERVISE MANUAL DATA ENTRY BUT NOT NEW PROCEDURES RELATED TO SUPERVISORY REVIEW AND RETENTION OF CONSOLIDATED REPORTS.
Sanction detail — filed text
THE FIRM WAS CENSURED, FINED $125,000, AND REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE UNDERTAKING ENUMERATED IN THIS AWC.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE No Information Filed This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) FINRA 2. Principal Sanction: Other Other Sanctions: N/A 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 09/03/2025 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: 2023077021301 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: No Product Other Product Types: 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS THAT IT DISTRIBUTED OR MADE AVAILABLE TO CUSTOMERS CONSOLIDATED REPORTS CONTAINING INACCURATE INFORMATION, OR OMITTING MATERIAL INFORMATION, ABOUT WHETHER CERTAIN ASSETS WERE HELD AWAY FROM THE FIRM. THE FINDINGS STATED THAT THE FIRM ALLOWED ITS REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES TO GENERATE CONSOLIDATED REPORTS THROUGH AN ELECTRONIC PLATFORM, THEN DISTRIBUTE OR MAKE AVAILABLE THOSE REPORTS TO CUSTOMERS. PERSONNEL IN THE FIRM'S HOME OFFICE HANDLED MANUAL ENTRIES INTO THAT PLATFORM, BUT THEY WERE NOT REASONABLY TRAINED, RESULTING IN THOUSANDS OF MANUALLY ENTERED, HELD-AWAY ASSETS BEING NOT DESIGNATED AS HELD AWAY OR INACCURATELY DESIGNATED AS NOT HELD AWAY. THE FIRM DID NOT UPDATE AUTOMATED DATA FEEDS FROM SEVEN PRODUCT SPONSORS INTO ITS CONSOLIDATED REPORTING PLATFORM WHEN IT EXPANDED OFFERINGS OF THOSE SPONSORS' PRODUCTS, RESULTING IN THOUSANDS OF ASSETS NOT BEING CORRECTLY DESIGNATED AS HELD AWAY. IN ADDITION, MANY CONSOLIDATED REPORTS THAT INCLUDED HELD-AWAY ASSETS DID NOT DISCLOSE THAT THE HELD-AWAY ASSETS MAY NOT BE COVERED BY THE SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION (SIPC). THE COMMUNICATIONS THAT OMITTED INFORMATION ABOUT HELD-AWAY ASSETS AND SIPC COVERAGE DID NOT PROVIDE A SOUND BASIS TO EVALUATE THE FACTS CONCERNING CUSTOMER ASSETS. IN ADDITION, THE COMMUNICATIONS THAT INACCURATELY CATEGORIZED ASSETS AS NOT HELD AWAY WERE FALSE AND MISLEADING. THE FINDINGS ALSO STATED THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO MAINTAIN RECORDS OF WHICH CONSOLIDATED REPORTS WERE DISTRIBUTED OR MADE AVAILABLE TO CUSTOMERS. THE FINDINGS ALSO INCLUDED THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO DESIGN AND IMPLEMENT A REASONABLE SUPERVISORY SYSTEM TO REVIEW AND RETAIN CONSOLIDATED REPORTS. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE FIRM IMPLEMENTED PROCEDURES TO SUPERVISE MANUAL DATA ENTRY BUT NOT NEW PROCEDURES RELATED TO SUPERVISORY REVIEW AND RETENTION OF CONSOLIDATED REPORTS. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC) 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 09/03/2025 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 125,000.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: UNDERTAKING Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: THE FIRM WAS CENSURED, FINED $125,000, AND REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE UNDERTAKING ENUMERATED IN THIS AWC. 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided).
* Metrics are based on the latest available data, including Form ADV filings, brochures, and relationship summaries pulled from the SEC IAPD, and may be subject to change. Learn what is included in the Rialytix data. Please refer to the firm's official disclosures for the most accurate information using their CRD number. This is not investment advice.