Firm profile

Madison Avenue Securities, LLC

SAN DIEGO, CACRD 23224Registration Status: ApprovedEffective since February 24, 2009SEC # 801-69919Latest ADV September 3, 2026

Madison Avenue Securities, LLC is an SEC registered investment adviser organized as a limited liability company with a primary office location in San Diego, CA. Its latest Form ADV filing, dated September 3, 2026, reports $2.0B in regulatory assets under management, 125 employees, 57 offices, and 14,099 accounts.

Assets Under Management
$2.0B
Employees
125
Offices
57 offices
Total Clients
14,099

Associated firm names

4 names listed
  • ASHLAND SECURITIES, INC.
  • MADISON AVENUE SECURITIES, LLC
  • MADISON AVENUE SECURITIES, INC.
  • MADISON AVENUE SECURITIES

Leadership

2 roles identified
CCOMelissa Kay Pierson
COOVilayphone Fixsen

Advisory services offered

5 types reported
Financial Planning Services
Pension consulting services
Portfolio management for businesses

Fee models offered

4 types reported
Asset based fees
Commissions
Fixed fees

Offices & Contact

Primary office

SAN DIEGO, California, United States

Loading map…

Primary office regionOther reported regions

Shading shows states and countries with reported offices. Cities are listed below; shading does not indicate service coverage.

California

SAN DIEGOPrimary office · LOS ANGELES

Colorado

LAKEWOOD

Florida

WINTER PARK · SANTA ROSA BEACH · ORLANDO

Georgia

ATLANTA · SUWANEE · MACON

Idaho

COEUR D'ALENE · LEWISTON

Illinois

CRESTWOOD · SKOKIE

Indiana

EVANSVILLE

Kansas

DERBY · PRAIRIE VILLAGE

Kentucky

FT. MITCHELL

Michigan

BLOOMFIELD HILLS

New Jersey

OAK RIDGE · OCEAN VIEW

Pennsylvania

MOUNTAINTOP

South Carolina

GREENVILLE

Tennessee

FRANKLIN

Virginia

ROANOKE

25 office records listed · 57 total offices reported. 1 additional office addresses are undisclosed and are not mapped. Counts can use different reporting dates. SEC filers may list only their largest 25 additional offices.

Contact and digital presence

ADV profile links

Regulatory Assets Under Management Breakdown

Total regulatory assets under management$2.0Bas of September 3, 2026
Discretionary78.7%
$1.6B
79% of total RAUM78.7%
Non-discretionary21.3%
$431M
21% of total RAUM21.3%
Regulatory assets under management are split between discretionary and non-discretionary assets.

Client Coverage Demographics

Top client segmentIndividuals represent 96.0% of total clients.
Top client categories% of clientsClients
1
Individuals
96.0%
13,536
2
HNWI
3.9%
548
3
Charitable
0.1%
10
Additional categories (<0.1%)
Pension Plans5 clients

Assets under management Growth by Quarter

Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.

Total AUM$2.0B
Total Accounts14,099
10Y AUM Change+$1.5B (+316.4%)

Private Funds

Private funds reported by Madison Avenue Securities, LLC

Loading private fund disclosures…

Employee Growth by Quarter

Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.

Total Employees125
Clients per Employee113:1
10Y Employee Change+14 (+12.6%)

Historical AUM and employee figures reflect available SEC Form ADV filings under this CRD. Filing gaps may reflect registration status changes, dormant periods, state registration periods, firm restructuring, or other reporting changes. Rialytix does not interpolate missing periods.


Ownership

Reported direct and indirect ownership ranges

Each range applies to a separate reported relationship and should not be added together.

Reported ownership ranges

Highlighted bands show the percentage range reported in Form ADV.

0%25%50%75%100%
KT EQUITY PARTNERS II, LLCDirect owner · Schedule AInterest in MADISON AVENUE SECURITIES, LLC
75%+
DDC HOLDINGS, LLCIndirect owner · Schedule BInterest in KT EQUITY PARTNERS II, LLC
75%+
DAVID JAMES CALLANANIndirect owner · Schedule BInterest in DDC HOLDINGS, LLC
50% to < 75%
CODY GRANT FOSTERIndirect owner · Schedule BInterest in DDC HOLDINGS, LLC
50% to < 75%

Bars represent the reported range at that individual ownership step, not an estimated percentage of the advisory firm. Indirect relationships may refer to intermediate entities rather than directly to Madison Avenue Securities, LLC.

Reported ownership and control details

Form ADV · Filing date 2026-09-03 · Schedules A and B

9 entries
#Owner / person & roleInterest in entityReported interestControl personTitle / status acquiredSource
1MARTIN WILLIAM MCNEESPRESIDENTIndividualMADISON AVENUE SECURITIES, LLCLess than 5%Code NAYesPRESIDENT09/2017Schedule APDF page 37
2KT EQUITY PARTNERS II, LLCDIRECT OWNERDomestic entityMADISON AVENUE SECURITIES, LLC75% or moreCode EYesDIRECT OWNER02/2015Schedule APDF page 37
3DAVID JAMES CALLANANMANAGERIndividualMADISON AVENUE SECURITIES, LLCLess than 5%Code NANoMANAGER03/2015Schedule APDF page 37
4MELISSA KAY PIERSONCHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICERIndividualMADISON AVENUE SECURITIES, LLCLess than 5%Code NAYesCHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER04/2025Schedule APDF page 37
5VILAYPHONE FIXSENCHIEF OPERATING OFFICERIndividualMADISON AVENUE SECURITIES, LLCLess than 5%Code NAYesCHIEF OPERATING OFFICER04/2025Schedule APDF page 37
6SANDRA ANN WOODSFINOPIndividualMADISON AVENUE SECURITIES, LLCLess than 5%Code NAYesFINOP10/2025Schedule APDF page 37
7DDC HOLDINGS, LLCINDIRECT OWNERDomestic entityKT EQUITY PARTNERS II, LLC75% or moreCode ENoINDIRECT OWNER12/2016Schedule BPDF page 38
8DAVID JAMES CALLANANLLC MEMBERIndividualDDC HOLDINGS, LLC50% to less than 75%Code DNoLLC MEMBER12/2016Schedule BPDF page 38
9CODY GRANT FOSTERLLC MEMBERIndividualDDC HOLDINGS, LLC50% to less than 75%Code DNoLLC MEMBER12/2016Schedule BPDF page 38

Less than 5% may include zero. Code F identifies a role without specifying a percentage. Reported interests may overlap and may not include every owner. Total indirect ownership is not calculated.

Compliance & Disclosures

Filing dated 9/3/2026 9:28:33 AM

Responses were selected by the RIA in its filing. Questions are shortened for readability; “you” refers to the reporting firm, and some questions also cover advisory affiliates.

RIA or supervised-person involvementThe RIA reported that one or more events below involve the firm or its supervised persons.RIA responseYes
AFelonies2 Yes

In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:

  • A1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a felony?Yes
  • A2Been charged with a felony?Yes
BMisdemeanors2 No

In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:

  • B1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a misdemeanor involving investments, an investment-related business, fraud, false statements or omissions, wrongful taking of property, bribery, perjury, forgery, counterfeiting, or extortion?No
  • B2Been charged with a misdemeanor of the kind listed above?No
CSEC or CFTC actions3 Yes2 No

Has the SEC or CFTC ever:

  • C1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
  • C2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated SEC or CFTC regulations or statutes?Yes
  • C3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
  • C4Entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?Yes
  • C5Imposed a civil money penalty on you or an advisory affiliate, or ordered you or an advisory affiliate to cease and desist from any activity?Yes
DOther regulatory actions3 Yes2 No

Has any other federal regulatory agency, state regulatory agency, or foreign financial regulatory authority ever:

  • D1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission, or was dishonest, unfair, or unethical?Yes
  • D2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related regulations or statutes?Yes
  • D3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
  • D4In the past ten years, entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?Yes
  • D5Denied, suspended, or revoked your or an advisory affiliate’s registration or license, or otherwise prevented association with an investment-related business or restricted activities?No
ESelf-regulatory organization actions2 Yes2 No

Has a self-regulatory organization or commodities exchange ever:

  • E1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?Yes
  • E2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated its rules, other than a violation designated as a minor rule violation under an SEC-approved plan?Yes
  • E3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
  • E4Disciplined you or an advisory affiliate by expulsion, suspension, barring association with other members, or otherwise restricting activities?No
FProfessional authorizations1 No
  • FHas an authorization to act as an attorney, accountant, or federal contractor granted to you or an advisory affiliate ever been revoked or suspended?No
GPending regulatory proceedings1 No
  • GAre you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a regulatory proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of C, D, or E?No
HCivil judicial actions and proceedings4 No

(1) Court actions

Has a domestic or foreign court:

  • H(1)(a)In the past ten years, enjoined you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
  • H(1)(b)Found that you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related statutes or regulations?No
  • H(1)(c)Dismissed, pursuant to a settlement agreement, an investment-related civil action brought against you or an advisory affiliate by a state or foreign financial regulatory authority?No

(2) Pending civil proceedings

  • H(2)Are you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a civil proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of H(1)?No
Additional DRP filings 10 source blocks

Verbatim excerpts from supporting DRP filings, which may concern the firm or advisory affiliates. Amounts retain their filed labels; no total or attribution is inferred.

criminal · block 1PDF pages 38–39
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.A. or
11.B. of Form ADV.
Criminal
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.A(1)
11.A(2)
11.B(1)
11.B(2)
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
Multiple counts of the same charge arising out of the same event(s) should be reported on the same DRP. Unrelated criminal actions, including separate
cases arising out of the same event, must be reported on separate DRPs. Use this DRP to report all charges arising out of the same event. One event may
result in more than one affirmative answer to the items listed above.
PART I

A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
2057790
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
HOLT, TIMOTHY, HAROLD
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  If charge(s) were brought against an organization over which you or an advisory affiliate exercise(d) control: Enter organization name, whether or not
the organization was an investment-related business and your or the advisory affiliate's position, title, or relationship. 
2.
Formal Charge(s) were brought in: (include name of Federal, Military, State or Foreign Court, Location of Court - City or County and State or Country,
Docket/Case number). 
3.
Event Disclosure Detail (Use this for both organizational and individual charges.)
A. Date First Charged (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
B.
Event Disclosure Detail (include Charge(s)/Charge Description(s), and for each charge provide: (1) number of counts, (2) felony or misdemeanor,
(3) plea for each charge, and (4) product type if charge is investment-related). 
C.
Did any of the Charge(s) within the Event involve a felony? 
 Yes
 No
D.
Current status of the Event? 
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
E.
Event Status Date (complete unless status is Pending) (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Disposition Disclosure Detail: 
Include for each charge (a) Disposition Type (e.g., convicted, acquitted, dismissed, pretrial, etc.), (b) Date, (c) Sentence/Penalty, (d) Duration (if
sentence - suspension, probation, etc.), (e) Start Date of Penalty, (f) Penalty/Fine Amount, and (g) Date Paid. 
5.
Provide a brief summary of circumstances leading to the charge(s) as well as the disposition. Include the relevant dates when the conduct which was
the subject of the charge(s) occurred. (Your response must fit within the space provided.)
criminal · block 2PDF pages 39–41
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.A. or
11.B. of Form ADV.
Criminal

Check item(s) being responded to:
11.A(1)
11.A(2)
11.B(1)
11.B(2)
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
Multiple counts of the same charge arising out of the same event(s) should be reported on the same DRP. Unrelated criminal actions, including separate
cases arising out of the same event, must be reported on separate DRPs. Use this DRP to report all charges arising out of the same event. One event may
result in more than one affirmative answer to the items listed above.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
6294723
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
MCBRIDE, GREGORY JOSEPH
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  If charge(s) were brought against an organization over which you or an advisory affiliate exercise(d) control: Enter organization name, whether or not
the organization was an investment-related business and your or the advisory affiliate's position, title, or relationship. 
2.
Formal Charge(s) were brought in: (include name of Federal, Military, State or Foreign Court, Location of Court - City or County and State or Country,
Docket/Case number). 
3.
Event Disclosure Detail (Use this for both organizational and individual charges.)
A. Date First Charged (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
B.
Event Disclosure Detail (include Charge(s)/Charge Description(s), and for each charge provide: (1) number of counts, (2) felony or misdemeanor,
(3) plea for each charge, and (4) product type if charge is investment-related). 
C.
Did any of the Charge(s) within the Event involve a felony? 
 Yes
 No
D.
Current status of the Event? 
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
E.
Event Status Date (complete unless status is Pending) (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Disposition Disclosure Detail: 
Include for each charge (a) Disposition Type (e.g., convicted, acquitted, dismissed, pretrial, etc.), (b) Date, (c) Sentence/Penalty, (d) Duration (if
sentence - suspension, probation, etc.), (e) Start Date of Penalty, (f) Penalty/Fine Amount, and (g) Date Paid. 

5.
Provide a brief summary of circumstances leading to the charge(s) as well as the disposition. Include the relevant dates when the conduct which was
the subject of the charge(s) occurred. (Your response must fit within the space provided.)
regulatory · block 1PDF pages 41–42
Regulator name — filed text
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 150,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Decision & Order of Offer of Settlement

Action status / disposition — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, MAS AGREED TO CERTAIN UNDERTAKING, A CEASE AND DESIST ORDER, A CENSURE, AND THE PAYMENT OF THE FAIR FUNDS (DESCRIBED ABOVE) OUT OF THE ESCROW ACCOUNT TO THE APPROPRIATE PARTIES IN CONFORMITY WITH ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

THE SEC ALLEGED THAT MADISON AVENUE SECURITIES (MAS) DID NOT ADEQUATELY DISCLOSE THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST THAT EXISTED WHEN IT RECOMMENDED SWEEP ACCOUNT MONEY MARKET FUND OPTIONS TO ITS ADVISORY CLIENTS AND CERTAIN MUTUAL FUNDS, INCLUDING NO TRANSACTION FEE (NTF) MUTUAL FUNDS, THAT PAID A 12B-1 FEE OR A SHAREHOLDER SERVICE FEE, WHICH IN SOME CASES, WERE NOT REBATED BACK TO THE CLIENTS DUE TO AN OPERATIONAL ERROR.

Sanction detail — filed text

ON 6/8/2022, MAS DEPOSITED A TOTAL OF $803,173.69, WHICH INCLUDED DISGORGEMENT OF $579,523.76 PREJUDGMENT INTEREST OF $73,649.93 AND CIVIL MONEY PENALTY OF $150,000 (THE "FAIR FUNDS") IN AN ESCROW ACCOUNT AT A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION NOT UNACCEPTABLE TO THE SEC FOR DISTRIBUTION TO AFFECTED CLIENTS AND THE SEC IN CONFORMITY WITH THE ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
CEASE AND DESIST, CENSURE, DISGORGEMENT, UNDERTAKING

3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
07/06/2021
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
DATE OF FIRM RESPONSE TO SEC
4.
Docket/Case Number:
3-20872
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
CASH SWEEP
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE SEC ALLEGED THAT MADISON AVENUE SECURITIES (MAS) DID NOT ADEQUATELY DISCLOSE THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST THAT EXISTED WHEN IT
RECOMMENDED SWEEP ACCOUNT MONEY MARKET FUND OPTIONS TO ITS ADVISORY CLIENTS AND CERTAIN MUTUAL FUNDS, INCLUDING NO
TRANSACTION FEE (NTF) MUTUAL FUNDS, THAT PAID A 12B-1 FEE OR A SHAREHOLDER SERVICE FEE, WHICH IN SOME CASES, WERE NOT REBATED
BACK TO THE CLIENTS DUE TO AN OPERATIONAL ERROR.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Decision & Order of Offer of Settlement
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
05/31/2022
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 150,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
ON 6/8/2022, MAS DEPOSITED A TOTAL OF $803,173.69, WHICH INCLUDED DISGORGEMENT OF $579,523.76 PREJUDGMENT INTEREST OF
$73,649.93 AND CIVIL MONEY PENALTY OF $150,000 (THE "FAIR FUNDS") IN AN ESCROW ACCOUNT AT A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION NOT
UNACCEPTABLE TO THE SEC FOR DISTRIBUTION TO AFFECTED CLIENTS AND THE SEC IN CONFORMITY WITH THE ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, MAS AGREED TO CERTAIN UNDERTAKING, A CEASE AND DESIST ORDER, A CENSURE, AND THE
PAYMENT OF THE FAIR FUNDS (DESCRIBED ABOVE) OUT OF THE ESCROW ACCOUNT TO THE APPROPRIATE PARTIES IN CONFORMITY WITH ORDER.
regulatory · block 2PDF pages 42–44
Regulator name — filed text
STATE OF INDIANA, OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE, SECURITIES DIVISION.
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 1,500.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

THE INDIANA SECRETARY OF STATE, SECURITIES DIVISION ALLEGES THAT FROM APPROXIMATELY AUGUST TO NOVEMBER 2010, MADISON AVENUE SECURITIES, INC. ("MAS") ENGAGED IN A DISHONEST AND UNETHICAL PRACTICE BY FAILING TO SUPERVISE AGENT KEITH D. ROBINSON ("ROBINSON") WHEN IT APPROVED THE ADVERTISEMENTS AND/OR INVITATIONS OF ROBINSON FOR SEMINARS TO POTENTIAL CLIENTS WHICH STATED THAT ROBINSON WAS A "SEASONED INVESTMENT ADVISOR," ALTHOUGH ROBINSON HAS NEVER BEEN REGISTERED AS AN INVESTMENT ADVISER OR INVESTMENT ADVISER REPRESENTATIVE IN THE STATE OF INDIANA IN VIOLATION OF IND. CODE § 23­19­4­12(D)(13) AND 710 IAC 4­10­1(22).

Sanction detail — filed text

MAS PAID A CIVIL PENALTY OF $1,500 ON OR ABOUT JUNE 22, 2011.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action

Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
STATE OF INDIANA, OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE, SECURITIES DIVISION.
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
06/22/2011
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
11-0162 CA
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other
Other Product Types: 

UNKNOWN
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE INDIANA SECRETARY OF STATE, SECURITIES DIVISION ALLEGES THAT FROM APPROXIMATELY AUGUST TO NOVEMBER 2010, MADISON AVENUE
SECURITIES, INC. ("MAS") ENGAGED IN A DISHONEST AND UNETHICAL PRACTICE BY FAILING TO SUPERVISE AGENT KEITH D. ROBINSON ("ROBINSON")
WHEN IT APPROVED THE ADVERTISEMENTS AND/OR INVITATIONS OF ROBINSON FOR SEMINARS TO POTENTIAL CLIENTS WHICH STATED THAT
ROBINSON WAS A "SEASONED INVESTMENT ADVISOR," ALTHOUGH ROBINSON HAS NEVER BEEN REGISTERED AS AN INVESTMENT ADVISER OR
INVESTMENT ADVISER REPRESENTATIVE IN THE STATE OF INDIANA IN VIOLATION OF IND. CODE § 23­19­4­12(D)(13) AND 710 IAC 4­10­1(22).
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
06/22/2011
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 1,500.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
MAS PAID A CIVIL PENALTY OF $1,500 ON OR ABOUT JUNE 22, 2011.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 3PDF pages 44–46
Regulator name — filed text
FINRA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 12,500.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

FINRA RULE 2010, NASD RULES 2110, 3010, 3040(C), 3110: A REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE FIRM PARTICIPATED IN PRIVATE SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS WHEN PARTICIPATING IN THE OFFER AND SALE OF PRIVATE PLACEMENT OFFERINGS. THE FIRM FAILED TO RECORD THE TRANSACTIONS OF THE PRIVATE PLACEMENT OFFERINGS ON ITS BOOKS AND RECORDS AND FAILED TO ADEQUATELY SUPERVISE HIS CONDUCT WITH RESPECT TO THESE PRIVATE SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS.

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS, THEREFORE THE FIRM IS CENSURED AND FINED $12,500.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)

You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FINRA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other
Other Sanctions: 
N/A
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
06/20/2013
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
2011028857601
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other
Other Product Types: 
PRIVATE SECURITIES
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
FINRA RULE 2010, NASD RULES 2110, 3010, 3040(C), 3110: A REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE FIRM PARTICIPATED IN PRIVATE SECURITIES
TRANSACTIONS WHEN PARTICIPATING IN THE OFFER AND SALE OF PRIVATE PLACEMENT OFFERINGS. THE FIRM FAILED TO RECORD THE TRANSACTIONS
OF THE PRIVATE PLACEMENT OFFERINGS ON ITS BOOKS AND RECORDS AND FAILED TO ADEQUATELY SUPERVISE HIS CONDUCT WITH RESPECT TO
THESE PRIVATE SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.

10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
06/20/2013
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 12,500.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS,
THEREFORE THE FIRM IS CENSURED AND FINED $12,500.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 4PDF pages 46–48
Regulator name — filed text
FINRA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 75,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS THAT IT FAILED TO HAVE EITHER WRITTEN PROCEDURES OR A SUPERVISORY SYSTEM IN PLACE PERTAINING TO THE CREATION AND DISSEMINATION OF CONSOLIDATED REPORTS. THE FINDINGS STATED THAT 39 OF THE FIRM'S APPROXIMATELY 140 REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES USED MULTIPLE SYSTEMS TO PREPARE AND DISTRIBUTE CONSOLIDATED REPORTS TO CUSTOMERS. TEMPLATES USED BY 21 OF THE REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES ALLOWED FOR MANUAL ENTRY OF ACCOUNT INFORMATION. THE FIRM DISTRIBUTED APPROXIMATELY 6,800 CONSOLIDATED REPORTS TO CUSTOMERS, AND APPROXIMATELY 4,500 OF THOSE CONSOLIDATED REPORTS WERE GENERATED USING TEMPLATES THAT ALLOWED FOR MANUAL ENTRIES. ALTHOUGH MOST OF THE CONSOLIDATED REPORTS CONTAINED ADEQUATE DISCLOSURE, THE TEMPLATES USED BY 7 REPRESENTATIVES DID NOT. THE FIRM IMPLEMENTED PROCEDURES RELATING TO CONSOLIDATED REPORTS THAT REQUIRED REPRESENTATIVES TO, AMONG OTHER ITEMS, SUBMIT TEMPLATES TO THE COMPLIANCE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO USE AND PROVIDED FOR THE REVIEW OF CONSOLIDATED REPORTS DURING ANNUAL BRANCH EXAMINATIONS. THESE PROCEDURES, HOWEVER, WERE NOT CONSISTENTLY ENFORCED AND WERE INADEQUATE IN THAT THEY DID NOT PROVIDE FOR VERIFICATION OF MANUALLY ENTERED ACCOUNT ASSETS OR VALUATION INFORMATION. FURTHER, APPROXIMATELY 2,300 CONSOLIDATED REPORTS WERE NEITHER REVIEWED NOR RETAINED BY THE FIRM.

Sanction detail — filed text

THE FIRM WAS CENSURED AND FINED $75,000 AND THE FINE WAS PAID IN FULL ON 12/5/2016.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item

11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FINRA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other
Other Sanctions: 
N/A
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
12/05/2016
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
2015043246601
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS THAT IT FAILED TO HAVE
EITHER WRITTEN PROCEDURES OR A SUPERVISORY SYSTEM IN PLACE PERTAINING TO THE CREATION AND DISSEMINATION OF CONSOLIDATED
REPORTS. THE FINDINGS STATED THAT 39 OF THE FIRM'S APPROXIMATELY 140 REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES USED MULTIPLE SYSTEMS TO PREPARE
AND DISTRIBUTE CONSOLIDATED REPORTS TO CUSTOMERS. TEMPLATES USED BY 21 OF THE REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES ALLOWED FOR MANUAL
ENTRY OF ACCOUNT INFORMATION. THE FIRM DISTRIBUTED APPROXIMATELY 6,800 CONSOLIDATED REPORTS TO CUSTOMERS, AND APPROXIMATELY
4,500 OF THOSE CONSOLIDATED REPORTS WERE GENERATED USING TEMPLATES THAT ALLOWED FOR MANUAL ENTRIES. ALTHOUGH MOST OF THE
CONSOLIDATED REPORTS CONTAINED ADEQUATE DISCLOSURE, THE TEMPLATES USED BY 7 REPRESENTATIVES DID NOT. THE FIRM IMPLEMENTED
PROCEDURES RELATING TO CONSOLIDATED REPORTS THAT REQUIRED REPRESENTATIVES TO, AMONG OTHER ITEMS, SUBMIT TEMPLATES TO THE
COMPLIANCE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO USE AND PROVIDED FOR THE REVIEW OF CONSOLIDATED REPORTS DURING ANNUAL BRANCH EXAMINATIONS.
THESE PROCEDURES, HOWEVER, WERE NOT CONSISTENTLY ENFORCED AND WERE INADEQUATE IN THAT THEY DID NOT PROVIDE FOR VERIFICATION
OF MANUALLY ENTERED ACCOUNT ASSETS OR VALUATION INFORMATION. FURTHER, APPROXIMATELY 2,300 CONSOLIDATED REPORTS WERE NEITHER
REVIEWED NOR RETAINED BY THE FIRM.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/05/2016
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:

A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 75,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
THE FIRM WAS CENSURED AND FINED $75,000 AND THE FINE WAS PAID IN FULL ON 12/5/2016.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
Show 4 more source blocks
regulatory · block 5PDF pages 48–50
Regulator name — filed text
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 150,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Decision & Order of Offer of Settlement

Action status / disposition — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, MAS AGREED TO CERTAIN UNDERTAKING, A CEASE AND DESIST ORDER, A CENSURE AND THE PAYMENT OF THE FAIR FUNDS (DESCRIBED ABOVE) OUT OF THE ESCROW ACCOUNT TO THE APPROPRIATE PARTIES IN CONFORMITY WITH THE ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

THE SEC ALLEGED THAT MADISON AVENUE SECURITIES (MAS) DID NOT ADEQUATELY DISCLOSE THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST THAT EXISTED WHEN IT RECOMMENDED SWEEP ACCOUNT MONEY MARKET FUND OPTIONS TO ITS ADVISORY CLIENTS AND CERTAIN MUTUAL FUNDS, INCLUDING NO TRANSACTION FEE (NTF) MUTUAL FUNDS, THAT PAID A 12B-1 FEE OR A SHAREHOLDER SERVICE FEE, WHICH, IN SOME CASES, WERE NOT REBATED BACK TO THE CLIENTS DUE TO AN OPERATIONAL ERROR.

Sanction detail — filed text

ON 6/8/2022, MAS DEPOSITED A TOTAL OF $803,173.69, WHICH INCLUDED DISGORGEMENT OF $579,523.76, PREJUDGMENT INTEREST OF $73,649.93, AND CIVIL MONEY PENALTY OF $150,000 (THE "FAIR FUNDS") IN AN ESCROW ACCOUNT AT A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION NOT UNACCEPTABLE TO THE SEC FOR DISTRIBUTION TO AFFECTED CLIENTS AND THE SEC IN CONFORMITY WITH THE ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No

NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
CEASE AND DESIST, CENSURE, DISGORGEMENT, UNDERTAKING
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
07/02/2021
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
APPROXIMATE DATE OF RESPONSE TO SEC REQUEST
4.
Docket/Case Number:
3-20872
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
CASH SWEEP
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE SEC ALLEGED THAT MADISON AVENUE SECURITIES (MAS) DID NOT ADEQUATELY DISCLOSE THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST THAT EXISTED WHEN IT
RECOMMENDED SWEEP ACCOUNT MONEY MARKET FUND OPTIONS TO ITS ADVISORY CLIENTS AND CERTAIN MUTUAL FUNDS, INCLUDING NO
TRANSACTION FEE (NTF) MUTUAL FUNDS, THAT PAID A 12B-1 FEE OR A SHAREHOLDER SERVICE FEE, WHICH, IN SOME CASES, WERE NOT REBATED
BACK TO THE CLIENTS DUE TO AN OPERATIONAL ERROR.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Decision & Order of Offer of Settlement
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
05/31/2022
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 150,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
ON 6/8/2022, MAS DEPOSITED A TOTAL OF $803,173.69, WHICH INCLUDED DISGORGEMENT OF $579,523.76, PREJUDGMENT INTEREST OF
$73,649.93, AND CIVIL MONEY PENALTY OF $150,000 (THE "FAIR FUNDS") IN AN ESCROW ACCOUNT AT A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION NOT
UNACCEPTABLE TO THE SEC FOR DISTRIBUTION TO AFFECTED CLIENTS AND THE SEC IN CONFORMITY WITH THE ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER.

13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, MAS AGREED TO CERTAIN UNDERTAKING, A CEASE AND DESIST ORDER, A CENSURE AND THE
PAYMENT OF THE FAIR FUNDS (DESCRIBED ABOVE) OUT OF THE ESCROW ACCOUNT TO THE APPROPRIATE PARTIES IN CONFORMITY WITH THE ORDER.
regulatory · block 6PDF pages 50–52
Regulator name — filed text
FINRA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 50,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)

Action status / disposition — filed text

THIS MATTER INVOLVED 13 ACCOUNTS (THE FIRM HAD OVER 15,000 ACCOUNTS AT THE TIME OF THE ACTIVITY) AND TRANSACTIONS THAT TOOK PLACE MORE THAN FIVE YEARS AGO. AS DESCRIBED IN THE AWC, THE FIRM HAS SINCE TAKEN CORRECTIVE ACTION RELATED TO ITS SUPERVISORY SYSTEM REGARDING MUTUAL FUND SALES.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS THAT IT FAILED TO ESTABLISH, MAINTAIN, AND ENFORCE A SUPERVISORY SYSTEM, INCLUDING WSPS, REASONABLY DESIGNED TO SUPERVISE MUTUAL FUND TRANSACTIONS THAT THE FIRM'S REPRESENTATIVES EFFECTED THROUGH ITS ELECTRONIC ORDER ENTRY SYSTEM TO CONFIRM THE SUITABILITY OF THE TRANSACTIONS REGARDING POTENTIAL AVAILABLE SALES CHARGE DISCOUNTS. THE FINDINGS STATED THAT THE FIRM USED A PROCESS CALLED A T- PLUS 1 REVIEW WHERE FIRM PRINCIPALS MANUALLY REVIEWED MUTUAL FUND TRANSACTIONS SUBMITTED THROUGH THE ELECTRONIC ORDER ENTRY SYSTEM THE DAY AFTER THE TRANSACTION. THE FIRM USED AN ELECTRONIC TRADE MONITORING PROGRAM FOR THE FIRM'S SUITABILITY REVIEW OF TRANSACTIONS ENTERED INTO THE ELECTRONIC ORDER ENTRY SYSTEM, ALONG WITH A PRINCIPAL'S REVIEW OF THE TRADE MONITORING PROGRAM'S SURVEILLANCE ALERTS, INCLUDING FOR "FUND FAMILY DIVERSIFICATION." NEITHER THE T-PLUS-1 OR SURVEILLANCE ALERT REVIEW PROCESS ALLOWED FOR REASONABLE REVIEW OF THE SUITABILITY OF CUSTOMERS' PURCHASES OF MUTUAL FUNDS IN MULTIPLE DIFFERENT MUTUAL FUND FAMILIES, EITHER SIMULTANEOUSLY OR SEQUENTIALLY, RESULTING IN MISSED SALES CHARGE DISCOUNTS. NEITHER PROCESS INCLUDED A REVIEW OF CUSTOMERS' MUTUAL FUNDS HOLDINGS PURCHASED AWAY FROM THE FIRM THAT COULD HAVE BEEN USED TO ACHIEVE SALES CHARGE DISCOUNTS THROUGH A RIGHT OF ACCUMULATION. FURTHER, 12 FIRM CUSTOMER HOUSEHOLDS PURCHASED MUTUAL FUNDS IN MULTIPLE DIFFERENT MUTUAL FUND FAMILIES, EITHER SIMULTANEOUSLY OR SEQUENTIALLY, IN TRANSACTIONS SUBMITTED THROUGH THE THE ELECTRONIC ORDER ENTRY SYSTEM. THESE CUSTOMERS' SALES CHARGES WOULD HAVE BEEN REDUCED HAD THEY PURCHASED MUTUAL FUNS ALL WITHIN ONE MUTUAL FUND FAMILY, RATHER THAN AMONG SEVER FUND FAMILIES. IN ADDITION TO THOSE CUSTOMERS, ANOTHER CUSTOMER SIMULTANEOUSLY PURCHASED SIX MUTUAL FUNDS IN FIVE DIFFERENT MUTUAL FUND FAMILIES AT THE RECOMMENDATION OF A FIRM REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVE IN TRANSACTIONS SUBMITTED VIA THE FIRM'S ELECTRONIC ORDER ENTRY SYSTEM. AT THE TIME, THE CUSTOMER ALREADY HELD MUTUAL FUNDS AWAY FROM THE FIRM. ALTHOUGH THE STRATEGY INVOLVED HIGHLY-RATED FUNDS, THE CUSTOMER'S SALES CHARGES WOULD HAVE BEEN REDUCED IF HE HAD PURCHASED MUTUAL FUNDS IN ONE MUTUAL FUND FAMILY AND REDUCED EVEN FURTHER IF HE HAD INVESTED IN THE MUTUAL FUND FAMILY OF THE FUNDS HE HELD AWAY FROM THE FIRM. THIS CUSTOMER WAS COMPENSATED FOR THE MISSED SALES CHARGES DISCOUNTS THROUGH A SEPARATE SETTLEMENT. THE FIRM HAS SINCE REVISED ITS SUPERVISORY SYSTEM, INCLUDING WSPS, REGARDING MUTUAL FUND SUPERVISION, INCLUDING FURTHER DESCRIBING THE T- PLUS-1 AND SURVEILLANCE ALERT REVIEW PROCESSES FOR MUTUAL FUND TRANSACTIONS.

Sanction detail — filed text

THE FIRM WAS CENSURED, FINED $50,000 AND ORDERED TO PAY $63,296, PLUS INTEREST, IN RESTITUTION TO CUSTOMERS.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FINRA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
CENSURE AND RESTITUTION PLUS INTEREST.

3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
05/01/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
2019061187802
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS THAT IT FAILED TO
ESTABLISH, MAINTAIN, AND ENFORCE A SUPERVISORY SYSTEM, INCLUDING WSPS, REASONABLY DESIGNED TO SUPERVISE MUTUAL FUND
TRANSACTIONS THAT THE FIRM'S REPRESENTATIVES EFFECTED THROUGH ITS ELECTRONIC ORDER ENTRY SYSTEM TO CONFIRM THE SUITABILITY OF THE
TRANSACTIONS REGARDING POTENTIAL AVAILABLE SALES CHARGE DISCOUNTS. THE FINDINGS STATED THAT THE FIRM USED A PROCESS CALLED A T-
PLUS 1 REVIEW WHERE FIRM PRINCIPALS MANUALLY REVIEWED MUTUAL FUND TRANSACTIONS SUBMITTED THROUGH THE ELECTRONIC ORDER ENTRY
SYSTEM THE DAY AFTER THE TRANSACTION. THE FIRM USED AN ELECTRONIC TRADE MONITORING PROGRAM FOR THE FIRM'S SUITABILITY REVIEW OF
TRANSACTIONS ENTERED INTO THE ELECTRONIC ORDER ENTRY SYSTEM, ALONG WITH A PRINCIPAL'S REVIEW OF THE TRADE MONITORING PROGRAM'S
SURVEILLANCE ALERTS, INCLUDING FOR "FUND FAMILY DIVERSIFICATION." NEITHER THE T-PLUS-1 OR SURVEILLANCE ALERT REVIEW PROCESS
ALLOWED FOR REASONABLE REVIEW OF THE SUITABILITY OF CUSTOMERS' PURCHASES OF MUTUAL FUNDS IN MULTIPLE DIFFERENT MUTUAL FUND
FAMILIES, EITHER SIMULTANEOUSLY OR SEQUENTIALLY, RESULTING IN MISSED SALES CHARGE DISCOUNTS. NEITHER PROCESS INCLUDED A REVIEW
OF CUSTOMERS' MUTUAL FUNDS HOLDINGS PURCHASED AWAY FROM THE FIRM THAT COULD HAVE BEEN USED TO ACHIEVE SALES CHARGE DISCOUNTS
THROUGH A RIGHT OF ACCUMULATION. FURTHER, 12 FIRM CUSTOMER HOUSEHOLDS PURCHASED MUTUAL FUNDS IN MULTIPLE DIFFERENT MUTUAL
FUND FAMILIES, EITHER SIMULTANEOUSLY OR SEQUENTIALLY, IN TRANSACTIONS SUBMITTED THROUGH THE THE ELECTRONIC ORDER ENTRY SYSTEM.
THESE CUSTOMERS' SALES CHARGES WOULD HAVE BEEN REDUCED HAD THEY PURCHASED MUTUAL FUNS ALL WITHIN ONE MUTUAL FUND FAMILY,
RATHER THAN AMONG SEVER FUND FAMILIES. IN ADDITION TO THOSE CUSTOMERS, ANOTHER CUSTOMER SIMULTANEOUSLY PURCHASED SIX MUTUAL
FUNDS IN FIVE DIFFERENT MUTUAL FUND FAMILIES AT THE RECOMMENDATION OF A FIRM REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVE IN TRANSACTIONS SUBMITTED
VIA THE FIRM'S ELECTRONIC ORDER ENTRY SYSTEM. AT THE TIME, THE CUSTOMER ALREADY HELD MUTUAL FUNDS AWAY FROM THE FIRM. ALTHOUGH
THE STRATEGY INVOLVED HIGHLY-RATED FUNDS, THE CUSTOMER'S SALES CHARGES WOULD HAVE BEEN REDUCED IF HE HAD PURCHASED MUTUAL
FUNDS IN ONE MUTUAL FUND FAMILY AND REDUCED EVEN FURTHER IF HE HAD INVESTED IN THE MUTUAL FUND FAMILY OF THE FUNDS HE HELD AWAY
FROM THE FIRM. THIS CUSTOMER WAS COMPENSATED FOR THE MISSED SALES CHARGES DISCOUNTS THROUGH A SEPARATE SETTLEMENT. THE FIRM
HAS SINCE REVISED ITS SUPERVISORY SYSTEM, INCLUDING WSPS, REGARDING MUTUAL FUND SUPERVISION, INCLUDING FURTHER DESCRIBING THE T-
PLUS-1 AND SURVEILLANCE ALERT REVIEW PROCESSES FOR MUTUAL FUND TRANSACTIONS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
05/01/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 50,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
PLUS INTEREST
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
THE FIRM WAS CENSURED, FINED $50,000 AND ORDERED TO PAY $63,296, PLUS INTEREST, IN RESTITUTION TO CUSTOMERS.

13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THIS MATTER INVOLVED 13 ACCOUNTS (THE FIRM HAD OVER 15,000 ACCOUNTS AT THE TIME OF THE ACTIVITY) AND TRANSACTIONS THAT TOOK PLACE
MORE THAN FIVE YEARS AGO. AS DESCRIBED IN THE AWC, THE FIRM HAS SINCE TAKEN CORRECTIVE ACTION RELATED TO ITS SUPERVISORY SYSTEM
REGARDING MUTUAL FUND SALES.
regulatory · block 7PDF pages 52–53
Regulator name — filed text
TEXAS STATE SECURITIES BOARD
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 20,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Order

Action status / disposition — filed text

NONE
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

SURING THE PERIOD 2014 THROUGH 2017, MADISON AVENUE SECURITIES, LLC FAILED TO ESTABLISH, MAINTAIN AND ENFORCE A SUPERVISORY SYSTEM TO SUPERVISE THE ACTIVITIES OF ITS AGENTS RELATING TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS. SPECIFICALLY, AFTER ADOPTING DIFFERENT BRANCH OFFICE SPECIFIC GUIDELINES FOR ONE FORM AGENT, THE FIRM DID NOT CONSISTENTLY APPLY AN ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENT ACCOUNT SCORE WORKSHEET, WHICH WAS USED TO ASSESS COMPLIANCE FOR PURCHASES OF ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENT SALES. THE FIRM ALSO FAILED TO CREATE A NEW TOOL TO MONITOR FOR THE BRANCH-OFFICE SPECIFIC COMPLIANCE OF ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENT SALES. PURSUANT TO SECTION 4007.106 (A)(3) OF THE TEXAS SECURITIES ACT, THE FIRM'S VIOLATIONS OF 115.10 OF THE BOARD RULES CONSTITUTE A BASIS FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AGAINST THE FIRM. IT WAS ORDERED THAT MADISON AVENUE SECURITIES, LLC PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $20,000 TO THE GENERAL FUND OF THE STATE OF TEXAS WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE ORDER. IT WAS ALSO ORDERED THAT MADISON AVENUE SECURITIES, LLC COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF AN UNDERTAKING WITH THE TEXAS STATE SECURITIES BOARD.

Sanction detail — filed text

NONE
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
TEXAS STATE SECURITIES BOARD
2.
Principal Sanction:
Undertaking
Other Sanctions: 

3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
06/30/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
IC23-CAF-03
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
MADISON AVENUE SECURITIES, LLC
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other
Other Product Types: 
ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
SURING THE PERIOD 2014 THROUGH 2017, MADISON AVENUE SECURITIES, LLC FAILED TO ESTABLISH, MAINTAIN AND ENFORCE A SUPERVISORY
SYSTEM TO SUPERVISE THE ACTIVITIES OF ITS AGENTS RELATING TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS. SPECIFICALLY, AFTER
ADOPTING DIFFERENT BRANCH OFFICE SPECIFIC GUIDELINES FOR ONE FORM AGENT, THE FIRM DID NOT CONSISTENTLY APPLY AN ALTERNATIVE
INVESTMENT ACCOUNT SCORE WORKSHEET, WHICH WAS USED TO ASSESS COMPLIANCE FOR PURCHASES OF ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENT SALES. THE
FIRM ALSO FAILED TO CREATE A NEW TOOL TO MONITOR FOR THE BRANCH-OFFICE SPECIFIC COMPLIANCE OF ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENT SALES.
PURSUANT TO SECTION 4007.106 (A)(3) OF THE TEXAS SECURITIES ACT, THE FIRM'S VIOLATIONS OF 115.10 OF THE BOARD RULES CONSTITUTE A
BASIS FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE AGAINST THE FIRM. IT WAS ORDERED THAT MADISON AVENUE SECURITIES, LLC PAY AN
ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $20,000 TO THE GENERAL FUND OF THE STATE OF TEXAS WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE ORDER. IT WAS ALSO
ORDERED THAT MADISON AVENUE SECURITIES, LLC COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF AN UNDERTAKING WITH THE TEXAS STATE SECURITIES BOARD.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Order
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
06/30/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 20,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKING
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
NONE
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
NONE
regulatory · block 8PDF pages 53–55
Regulator name — filed text
FINRA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 125,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS THAT IT DISTRIBUTED OR MADE AVAILABLE TO CUSTOMERS CONSOLIDATED REPORTS CONTAINING INACCURATE INFORMATION, OR OMITTING MATERIAL INFORMATION, ABOUT WHETHER CERTAIN ASSETS WERE HELD AWAY FROM THE FIRM. THE FINDINGS STATED THAT THE FIRM ALLOWED ITS REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES TO GENERATE CONSOLIDATED REPORTS THROUGH AN ELECTRONIC PLATFORM, THEN DISTRIBUTE OR MAKE AVAILABLE THOSE REPORTS TO CUSTOMERS. PERSONNEL IN THE FIRM'S HOME OFFICE HANDLED MANUAL ENTRIES INTO THAT PLATFORM, BUT THEY WERE NOT REASONABLY TRAINED, RESULTING IN THOUSANDS OF MANUALLY ENTERED, HELD-AWAY ASSETS BEING NOT DESIGNATED AS HELD AWAY OR INACCURATELY DESIGNATED AS NOT HELD AWAY. THE FIRM DID NOT UPDATE AUTOMATED DATA FEEDS FROM SEVEN PRODUCT SPONSORS INTO ITS CONSOLIDATED REPORTING PLATFORM WHEN IT EXPANDED OFFERINGS OF THOSE SPONSORS' PRODUCTS, RESULTING IN THOUSANDS OF ASSETS NOT BEING CORRECTLY DESIGNATED AS HELD AWAY. IN ADDITION, MANY CONSOLIDATED REPORTS THAT INCLUDED HELD-AWAY ASSETS DID NOT DISCLOSE THAT THE HELD-AWAY ASSETS MAY NOT BE COVERED BY THE SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION (SIPC). THE COMMUNICATIONS THAT OMITTED INFORMATION ABOUT HELD-AWAY ASSETS AND SIPC COVERAGE DID NOT PROVIDE A SOUND BASIS TO EVALUATE THE FACTS CONCERNING CUSTOMER ASSETS. IN ADDITION, THE COMMUNICATIONS THAT INACCURATELY CATEGORIZED ASSETS AS NOT HELD AWAY WERE FALSE AND MISLEADING. THE FINDINGS ALSO STATED THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO MAINTAIN RECORDS OF WHICH CONSOLIDATED REPORTS WERE DISTRIBUTED OR MADE AVAILABLE TO CUSTOMERS. THE FINDINGS ALSO INCLUDED THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO DESIGN AND IMPLEMENT A REASONABLE SUPERVISORY SYSTEM TO REVIEW AND RETAIN CONSOLIDATED REPORTS. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE FIRM IMPLEMENTED PROCEDURES TO SUPERVISE MANUAL DATA ENTRY BUT NOT NEW PROCEDURES RELATED TO SUPERVISORY REVIEW AND RETENTION OF CONSOLIDATED REPORTS.

Sanction detail — filed text

THE FIRM WAS CENSURED, FINED $125,000, AND REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE UNDERTAKING ENUMERATED IN THIS AWC.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.

Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FINRA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other
Other Sanctions: 
N/A
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
09/03/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
2023077021301
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):

6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS THAT IT DISTRIBUTED
OR MADE AVAILABLE TO CUSTOMERS CONSOLIDATED REPORTS CONTAINING INACCURATE INFORMATION, OR OMITTING MATERIAL INFORMATION,
ABOUT WHETHER CERTAIN ASSETS WERE HELD AWAY FROM THE FIRM. THE FINDINGS STATED THAT THE FIRM ALLOWED ITS REGISTERED
REPRESENTATIVES TO GENERATE CONSOLIDATED REPORTS THROUGH AN ELECTRONIC PLATFORM, THEN DISTRIBUTE OR MAKE AVAILABLE THOSE
REPORTS TO CUSTOMERS. PERSONNEL IN THE FIRM'S HOME OFFICE HANDLED MANUAL ENTRIES INTO THAT PLATFORM, BUT THEY WERE NOT
REASONABLY TRAINED, RESULTING IN THOUSANDS OF MANUALLY ENTERED, HELD-AWAY ASSETS BEING NOT DESIGNATED AS HELD AWAY OR
INACCURATELY DESIGNATED AS NOT HELD AWAY. THE FIRM DID NOT UPDATE AUTOMATED DATA FEEDS FROM SEVEN PRODUCT SPONSORS INTO ITS
CONSOLIDATED REPORTING PLATFORM WHEN IT EXPANDED OFFERINGS OF THOSE SPONSORS' PRODUCTS, RESULTING IN THOUSANDS OF ASSETS NOT
BEING CORRECTLY DESIGNATED AS HELD AWAY. IN ADDITION, MANY CONSOLIDATED REPORTS THAT INCLUDED HELD-AWAY ASSETS DID NOT
DISCLOSE THAT THE HELD-AWAY ASSETS MAY NOT BE COVERED BY THE SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION (SIPC). THE
COMMUNICATIONS THAT OMITTED INFORMATION ABOUT HELD-AWAY ASSETS AND SIPC COVERAGE DID NOT PROVIDE A SOUND BASIS TO EVALUATE
THE FACTS CONCERNING CUSTOMER ASSETS. IN ADDITION, THE COMMUNICATIONS THAT INACCURATELY CATEGORIZED ASSETS AS NOT HELD AWAY
WERE FALSE AND MISLEADING. THE FINDINGS ALSO STATED THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO MAINTAIN RECORDS OF WHICH CONSOLIDATED REPORTS WERE
DISTRIBUTED OR MADE AVAILABLE TO CUSTOMERS. THE FINDINGS ALSO INCLUDED THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO DESIGN AND IMPLEMENT A REASONABLE
SUPERVISORY SYSTEM TO REVIEW AND RETAIN CONSOLIDATED REPORTS. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE FIRM IMPLEMENTED PROCEDURES TO SUPERVISE
MANUAL DATA ENTRY BUT NOT NEW PROCEDURES RELATED TO SUPERVISORY REVIEW AND RETENTION OF CONSOLIDATED REPORTS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
09/03/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 125,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKING
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
THE FIRM WAS CENSURED, FINED $125,000, AND REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE UNDERTAKING ENUMERATED IN THIS AWC.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).

* Metrics are based on the latest available data, including Form ADV filings, brochures, and relationship summaries pulled from the SEC IAPD, and may be subject to change. Learn what is included in the Rialytix data. Please refer to the firm's official disclosures for the most accurate information using their CRD number. This is not investment advice.