Assets under management Growth by Quarter
Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.
Private Funds
Private funds reported by Ingalls & Snyder LLC
Employee Growth by Quarter
Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.
Historical AUM and employee figures reflect available SEC Form ADV filings under this CRD. Filing gaps may reflect registration status changes, dormant periods, state registration periods, firm restructuring, or other reporting changes. Rialytix does not interpolate missing periods.
Ownership
Reported direct and indirect ownership ranges
Reported ownership ranges
Highlighted bands show the percentage range reported in Form ADV.
Bars represent the reported range at that individual ownership step, not an estimated percentage of the advisory firm. Indirect relationships may refer to intermediate entities rather than directly to Ingalls & Snyder LLC.
No indirect ownership information reported in the source’s Schedule B.
Reported ownership and control details
Form ADV · Filing date 2026-07-06 · Schedules A and B
| # | Owner / person & role | Interest in entity | Reported interest | Control person | Title / status acquired | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | THOMAS ONEIL JR BOUCHERMANAGING DIRECTORIndividual | INGALLS INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | MANAGING DIRECTOR01/1996 | Schedule APDF page 38 |
| 2 | JOHN JOSEPH DOUGHERTYMANAGING DIRECTORIndividual | INGALLS INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | MANAGING DIRECTOR01/1996 | Schedule APDF page 38 |
| 3 | GUY RICHARDS RIEGELMANAGING DIRECTORIndividual | INGALLS INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | MANAGING DIRECTOR07/2011 | Schedule APDF page 38 |
| 4 | KEITH SIMON LANE-ZUCKERMANAGING DIRECTORIndividual | INGALLS INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | MANAGING DIRECTOR07/2011 | Schedule APDF page 38 |
| 5 | ROBERT ANTHONY CASECHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERIndividual | INGALLS INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER07/2011 | Schedule APDF page 38 |
| 6 | ROBERT ANTHONY CASESENIOR MANAGING DIRECTORIndividual | INGALLS INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | SENIOR MANAGING DIRECTOR09/2011 | Schedule APDF page 39 |
| 7 | APHRODITE MAVRICOS GARRISONMANAGING DIRECTORIndividual | INGALLS INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | MANAGING DIRECTOR03/2012 | Schedule APDF page 39 |
| 8 | CHRISTINE ELIZABETH WESTONMANAGING DIRECTORIndividual | INGALLS INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | MANAGING DIRECTOR01/2013 | Schedule APDF page 39 |
| 9 | SEAN PATRICK MEEHANMANAGING DIRECTORIndividual | INGALLS INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | MANAGING DIRECTOR01/2014 | Schedule APDF page 39 |
| 10 | CHRISTIAN CHIHONG PARKCHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICERIndividual | INGALLS INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER01/2016 | Schedule APDF page 39 |
| 11 | JAMES EDWIN THATCHERMANAGING DIRECTORIndividual | INGALLS INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | MANAGING DIRECTOR01/2017 | Schedule APDF page 39 |
| 12 | CHRISTIAN CHIHONG PARKEXECUTIVE DIRECTORIndividual | INGALLS INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR01/2020 | Schedule APDF page 39 |
| 13 | ADAM DAVID JANOVICMANAGING DIRECTORIndividual | INGALLS INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | MANAGING DIRECTOR01/2023 | Schedule APDF page 39 |
| 14 | ADAM F GRISANTIEXECUTIVE DIRECTORIndividual | INGALLS INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR01/2025 | Schedule APDF page 39 |
| 15 | ADAM F GRISANTICHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERIndividual | INGALLS INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER01/2025 | Schedule APDF page 39 |
| 16 | ADAM F GRISANTICHIEF OPERATIONS OFFICERIndividual | INGALLS INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | CHIEF OPERATIONS OFFICER01/2025 | Schedule APDF page 39 |
| 17 | ALICE BARZUN MCLEANMANAGING DIRECTORIndividual | INGALLS INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | MANAGING DIRECTOR01/2025 | Schedule APDF page 39 |
| 18 | I&S GROUP, LLCPARENT HOLDING COMPANYDomestic entity | INGALLS INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC | 75% or moreCode E | Yes | PARENT HOLDING COMPANY03/2025 | Schedule APDF page 39 |
Less than 5% may include zero. Code F identifies a role without specifying a percentage. Reported interests may overlap and may not include every owner. Total indirect ownership is not calculated.
Compliance & Disclosures
Filing dated 7/6/2026 3:32:05 PM
Responses were selected by the RIA in its filing. Questions are shortened for readability; “you” refers to the reporting firm, and some questions also cover advisory affiliates.
AFelonies2 No
In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:
- A1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a felony?No
- A2Been charged with a felony?No
BMisdemeanors2 No
In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:
- B1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a misdemeanor involving investments, an investment-related business, fraud, false statements or omissions, wrongful taking of property, bribery, perjury, forgery, counterfeiting, or extortion?No
- B2Been charged with a misdemeanor of the kind listed above?No
CSEC or CFTC actions5 No
Has the SEC or CFTC ever:
- C1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
- C2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated SEC or CFTC regulations or statutes?No
- C3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- C4Entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
- C5Imposed a civil money penalty on you or an advisory affiliate, or ordered you or an advisory affiliate to cease and desist from any activity?No
DOther regulatory actions1 Yes4 No
Has any other federal regulatory agency, state regulatory agency, or foreign financial regulatory authority ever:
- D1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission, or was dishonest, unfair, or unethical?No
- D2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related regulations or statutes?No
- D3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- D4In the past ten years, entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?Yes
- D5Denied, suspended, or revoked your or an advisory affiliate’s registration or license, or otherwise prevented association with an investment-related business or restricted activities?No
ESelf-regulatory organization actions1 Yes3 No
Has a self-regulatory organization or commodities exchange ever:
- E1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
- E2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated its rules, other than a violation designated as a minor rule violation under an SEC-approved plan?Yes
- E3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- E4Disciplined you or an advisory affiliate by expulsion, suspension, barring association with other members, or otherwise restricting activities?No
FProfessional authorizations1 No
- FHas an authorization to act as an attorney, accountant, or federal contractor granted to you or an advisory affiliate ever been revoked or suspended?No
GPending regulatory proceedings1 No
- GAre you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a regulatory proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of C, D, or E?No
HCivil judicial actions and proceedings4 No
(1) Court actions
Has a domestic or foreign court:
- H(1)(a)In the past ten years, enjoined you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
- H(1)(b)Found that you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related statutes or regulations?No
- H(1)(c)Dismissed, pursuant to a settlement agreement, an investment-related civil action brought against you or an advisory affiliate by a state or foreign financial regulatory authority?No
(2) Pending civil proceedings
- H(2)Are you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a civil proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of H(1)?No
Additional DRP filings 5 source blocks
Verbatim excerpts from supporting DRP filings, which may concern the firm or advisory affiliates. Amounts retain their filed labels; no total or attribution is inferred.
regulatory · block 1INGALLS & SNYDER LLCPDF pages 40–42
- Advisory affiliate name — filed text
- INGALLS & SNYDER LLC
- Regulator name — filed text
- FINRA
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 20,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Action status / disposition — filed text
INGALLS & SNYDER LLC SUBMITTED A LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE WAIVER AND CONSENT IN WHICH, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENING THE FINDINGS, IT CONSENTED TO FINDINGS THAT IT FAILED TO TRANSMIT ALL OF ITS REPORTABLE ORDER EVENTS TO THE ORDER AUDIT TRAIL SYSTEM ON NUMEROUS BUSINESS DAYS. THE FIRM FAILED TO PROVIDE DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE THAT IT PERFORMED THE SUPERVISORY REVIEWS SET FORTH IN ITS WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES CONCERNING OATS. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, INGALLS & SNYDER LLC CONSENTED TO THE FOLLOWING SANCTIONS: A CENSURE AND A FINE OF $20,000.00 (COMPOSED OF A $15,000.00 FINE FOR THE OATS MATTER AND A $5000.00 FINE FOR THE SUPERVISION MATTER).THE LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE WAIVER AND CONSENT WAS ACCEPTED BY FINRA ON JULY 28, 2010.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
NASD RULES 2110, 3010, 6955(A) - INGALLS & SNYDER, LLC FAILED TO TRANSMIT ALL OF ITS REPORTABLE ORDER EVENTS (ROES) TO THE ORDER AUDIT TRAIL SYSTEM (OATS) ON NUMEROUS BUSINESS DAYS. THE FIRM FAILED TO PROVIDE DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE THAT IT PERFORMED THE SUPERVISORY REVIEWS SET FORTH IN ITS WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES CONCERNING OATS.
Sanction detail — filed text
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, INGALLS & SNYDER LLC CONSENTED TO A FINE OF $20,000.00 AND A CENSURE.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE CRD Number: 2288 This advisory affiliate is a Firm an Individual Registered: Yes No Name: INGALLS & SNYDER LLC (For individuals, Last, First, Middle) This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) FINRA 2. Principal Sanction: Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s) Other Sanctions: CENSURE 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 07/28/2010 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: 2007009925401 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock) Other Product Types: 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): NASD RULES 2110, 3010, 6955(A) - INGALLS & SNYDER, LLC FAILED TO TRANSMIT ALL OF ITS REPORTABLE ORDER EVENTS (ROES) TO THE ORDER AUDIT TRAIL SYSTEM (OATS) ON NUMEROUS BUSINESS DAYS. THE FIRM FAILED TO PROVIDE DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE THAT IT PERFORMED THE SUPERVISORY REVIEWS SET FORTH IN ITS WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES CONCERNING OATS. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC) 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 07/28/2010 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 20,000.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, INGALLS & SNYDER LLC CONSENTED TO A FINE OF $20,000.00 AND A CENSURE. 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). INGALLS & SNYDER LLC SUBMITTED A LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE WAIVER AND CONSENT IN WHICH, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENING THE FINDINGS, IT CONSENTED TO FINDINGS THAT IT FAILED TO TRANSMIT ALL OF ITS REPORTABLE ORDER EVENTS TO THE ORDER AUDIT TRAIL SYSTEM ON NUMEROUS BUSINESS DAYS. THE FIRM FAILED TO PROVIDE DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE THAT IT PERFORMED THE SUPERVISORY REVIEWS SET FORTH IN ITS WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES CONCERNING OATS. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, INGALLS & SNYDER LLC CONSENTED TO THE FOLLOWING SANCTIONS: A CENSURE AND A FINE OF $20,000.00 (COMPOSED OF A $15,000.00 FINE FOR THE OATS MATTER AND A $5000.00 FINE FOR THE SUPERVISION MATTER).THE LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE WAIVER AND CONSENT WAS ACCEPTED BY FINRA ON JULY 28, 2010.
regulatory · block 2INGALLS & SNYDER LLCPDF pages 42–44
- Advisory affiliate name — filed text
- INGALLS & SNYDER LLC
- Regulator name — filed text
- NYSE MKT LLC
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 22,500.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Decision
Action status / disposition — filed text
PAYMENT PURSUANT TO THE AWC HAS BEEN SENT.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
THE STIPULATION OF FACTS AND CONSENT TO PENALTY WAS SUBMITTED FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF SETTLING THIS DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING, WITHOUT ADJUDICATION OF ANY ISSUES OF LAW OR FACT, AND WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING ANY ALLEGATIONS OR FINDINGS REFERRED TO THEREIN. THE FIRM, DURING THE REVIEW PERIOD, MISMARKED AS "CUSTOMER" INSTEAD OF "FIRM" APPROXIMATELY 156 OPTIONS ORDERS, REPRESENTING APPROXIMATELY 5,345 OPTIONS CONTRACTS, A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF WHICH WERE EXECUTED ON THE EXCHANGE, FOR PERSONAL ACCOUNTS OF CERTAIN MANAGING DIRECTORS OF THE FIRM. THE MISMARKINGS RESULTED FROM THE FIRM'S TRADERS ENTERING THE WRONG ORIGIN CODE WHEN ROUTING THE SUBJECT ORDERS FOR EXECUTION. THE FOREGOING MISMARKINGS, AMONG OTHER THINGS, ADVERSELY IMPACTED NYSE MKT'S ABILITY TO SURVEIL FOR AND DETECT POTENTIAL VIOLATIONS OF ITS RULES AND THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS. THE CONDUCT DESCRIBED VIOLATED EXCHANGE RULES 16, 324, AND 956NY; SECTION 17(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 ("EXCHANGE ACT"); AND EXCHANGE ACT RULE 17A-3. THE FIRM, DURING THE REVIEW PERIOD, FAILED TO ESTABLISH, MAINTAIN, ENFORCE, AND KEEP CURRENT A SYSTEM OF COMPLIANCE AND SUPERVISORY CONTROLS, REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES LAWS AND EXCHANGE RULES REGARDING ORIGIN CODE REQUIREMENTS WITH RESPECT TO ORDERS ENTERED ON BEHALF OF ITS MANAGING DIRECTORS. THE CONDUCT DESCRIBED VIOLATED EXCHANGE RULE 320.
Sanction detail — filed text
THE FIRM WAS CENSURED AND FINED $22,500.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page.
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name).
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
2288
This advisory affiliate is
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
INGALLS & SNYDER LLC
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances:
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
Yes
No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1. Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC
Other Federal
State
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO)
NYSE MKT LLC
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions:
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/15/2014
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
2012031567801
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Options
Other Product Types:
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE STIPULATION OF FACTS AND CONSENT TO PENALTY WAS SUBMITTED FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF SETTLING THIS DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING,
WITHOUT ADJUDICATION OF ANY ISSUES OF LAW OR FACT, AND WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING ANY ALLEGATIONS OR FINDINGS REFERRED TO
THEREIN. THE FIRM, DURING THE REVIEW PERIOD, MISMARKED AS "CUSTOMER" INSTEAD OF "FIRM" APPROXIMATELY 156 OPTIONS ORDERS,
REPRESENTING APPROXIMATELY 5,345 OPTIONS CONTRACTS, A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF WHICH WERE EXECUTED ON THE EXCHANGE, FOR
PERSONAL ACCOUNTS OF CERTAIN MANAGING DIRECTORS OF THE FIRM. THE MISMARKINGS RESULTED FROM THE FIRM'S TRADERS ENTERING THE
WRONG ORIGIN CODE WHEN ROUTING THE SUBJECT ORDERS FOR EXECUTION. THE FOREGOING MISMARKINGS, AMONG OTHER THINGS, ADVERSELY
IMPACTED NYSE MKT'S ABILITY TO SURVEIL FOR AND DETECT POTENTIAL VIOLATIONS OF ITS RULES AND THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS. THE
CONDUCT DESCRIBED VIOLATED EXCHANGE RULES 16, 324, AND 956NY; SECTION 17(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 ("EXCHANGE
ACT"); AND EXCHANGE ACT RULE 17A-3. THE FIRM, DURING THE REVIEW PERIOD, FAILED TO ESTABLISH, MAINTAIN, ENFORCE, AND KEEP CURRENT A
SYSTEM OF COMPLIANCE AND SUPERVISORY CONTROLS, REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES LAWS AND
EXCHANGE RULES REGARDING ORIGIN CODE REQUIREMENTS WITH RESPECT TO ORDERS ENTERED ON BEHALF OF ITS MANAGING DIRECTORS. THE
CONDUCT DESCRIBED VIOLATED EXCHANGE RULE 320.
8.
Current Status?
Pending
On Appeal
Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Decision
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
01/12/2015
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 22,500.00
Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
Disgorgement/Restitution
Censure
Cease and Desist/Injunction
Bar
Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
NONE
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived:
THE FIRM WAS CENSURED AND FINED $22,500.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
PAYMENT PURSUANT TO THE AWC HAS BEEN SENT.regulatory · block 3PDF pages 44–45
- Regulator name — filed text
- COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 6,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Settled
Action status / disposition — filed text
THE FINE WAS PAID AND THE MATTER HAS BEEN DISMISSED.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
THE VIRGINIA SECURITIES ACT (THE "ACT") REQUIRES ALL THIRD-PARTY SOLICITORS OF POTENTIAL INVESTMENT ADVISORY CLIENTS TO BE REGISTERED AS AN INVESTMENT ADVISOR REPRESENTATIVE REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE ACTIVITY IS LIMITED TO SOLICITATION ACTIVITIES RATHER THAN RENDERING OF INVESTMENT ADVICE. VIRGINIA ALLEGED THAT BETWEEN DECEMBER 2021 AND MARCH 2023, I&S VIOLATED § 13.1504 OF THE ACT WHEN RETAINED A THIRD-PARTY INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR ("SOLICITOR"), AN UNREGISTERED INVESTMENT ADVISOR REPRESENTATIVE WITH A PLACE OF BUSINESS IN THE COMMONWEALTH, TO SOLICIT AND REFER CLIENTS TO I&S FOR DISCRETIONARY, FEE-BASED MANAGED ACCOUNTS.
Sanction detail — filed text
THE MATTER WAS SETTLED FOR $6,000. $5,000 OF THE AMOUNT WAS A FINE. AN ADDITIONAL $1,000 WAS PAID TO REIMBURSE THE VIRGINIA FOR THE COSTS INCURRED BY THE STATE IN CONNECTION WITH THIS MATTER.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page.
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name).
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances:
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
Yes
No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1. Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC
Other Federal
State
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO)
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions:
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY):
08/21/2024
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
SEC-2023-00038
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types:
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE VIRGINIA SECURITIES ACT (THE "ACT") REQUIRES ALL THIRD-PARTY SOLICITORS OF POTENTIAL INVESTMENT ADVISORY CLIENTS TO BE
REGISTERED AS AN INVESTMENT ADVISOR REPRESENTATIVE REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE ACTIVITY IS LIMITED TO SOLICITATION ACTIVITIES
RATHER THAN RENDERING OF INVESTMENT ADVICE. VIRGINIA ALLEGED THAT BETWEEN DECEMBER 2021 AND MARCH 2023, I&S VIOLATED § 13.1504
OF THE ACT WHEN RETAINED A THIRD-PARTY INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR ("SOLICITOR"), AN UNREGISTERED INVESTMENT ADVISOR REPRESENTATIVE
WITH A PLACE OF BUSINESS IN THE COMMONWEALTH, TO SOLICIT AND REFER CLIENTS TO I&S FOR DISCRETIONARY, FEE-BASED MANAGED
ACCOUNTS.
8.
Current Status?
Pending
On Appeal
Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Settled
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
09/12/2024
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
THE FIRM PAID THE AMOUNT DUE ON 08/22/2024, BUT THE FINAL ORDER BY THE STATE WAS DATED 09/12/2024.
12. Resolution Detail:
A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 6,000.00
Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
Disgorgement/Restitution
Censure
Cease and Desist/Injunction
Bar
Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
ADDITIONAL $1000 TO REIMBURSE THE STATE OF VA FOR THE COST OF THE INVESTIGATION.
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived:
THE MATTER WAS SETTLED FOR $6,000. $5,000 OF THE AMOUNT WAS A FINE. AN ADDITIONAL $1,000 WAS PAID TO REIMBURSE THE VIRGINIA
FOR THE COSTS INCURRED BY THE STATE IN CONNECTION WITH THIS MATTER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE FINE WAS PAID AND THE MATTER HAS BEEN DISMISSED.regulatory · block 4PDF pages 45–47
- Regulator name — filed text
- INTERNATIONAL SECURITIES EXCHANGE, LLC
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 175,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Action status / disposition — filed text
FINAL PAYMENT PURSUANT TO THE AWC HAS BEEN SENT.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
AN ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT ("AWC") WAS ENTERED INTO FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF SETTLING A DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE ALLEGATIONS. THE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE FIRM WERE: (1) DURING THE REVIEW PERIOD BETWEEN APRIL 2009 AND AUGUST 2012, THE FIRM FAILED TO REPORT APPROXIMATELY 7,251 REPORTABLE POSITIONS BECAUSE THEY HAD BEEN AGGREGATED BY SERIES RATHER THAN UNDERLYING SECURITY AND SIDE OF THE MARKET; (2) DURING THE REVIEW PERIOD, BETWEEN JULY 2005 AND SEPTEMBER 2012, THE FIRM FAILED TO ACCURATELY REPORT CERTAIN REPORTABLE POSITIONS BECAUSE ACCOUNTS OVER WHICH THE FIRM HAD DISCRETION WERE REPORTED ON AN OMNIBUS BASIS RATHER THAN ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS; AND (3) BETWEEN JANUARY 2010 AND JUNE 2013, THE FIRM MISREPORTED APPROXIMATELY 3,075 POSITIONS TO LOPR AS A RESULT OF ITS INCORRECT POPULATION OF DATA IN THE ACCOUNT NAME, ACCOUNT ADDRESS, OR TAX IDENTIFICATION FIELDS. ALL OF THE AFOREMENTIONED INCIDENTS WERE IN VIOLATION OF ISE RULE 415(A). IN ADDITION, DURING THE REVIEW PERIOD, INGS FAILED TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE SUPERVISORY SYSTEMS AND CONTROLS IN PLACE, INCLUDING ADEQUATE WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES REASONABLE DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE ACCURATE REPORTING OF REPORTABLE OPTIONS POSITIONS TO LOPR IN VIOLATION OF ISE RULE 401.
Sanction detail — filed text
THE FIRM WAS CENSURED AND FINED $175,000.00
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page.
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name).
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances:
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
Yes
No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1. Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC
Other Federal
State
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO)
INTERNATIONAL SECURITIES EXCHANGE, LLC
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions:
CENSURE
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/11/2014
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
2012-070 AND 2013-076
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Options
Other Product Types:
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
AN ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT ("AWC") WAS ENTERED INTO FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF SETTLING A DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING, WITHOUT
ADMITTING OR DENYING THE ALLEGATIONS. THE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE FIRM WERE: (1) DURING THE REVIEW PERIOD BETWEEN APRIL 2009 AND
AUGUST 2012, THE FIRM FAILED TO REPORT APPROXIMATELY 7,251 REPORTABLE POSITIONS BECAUSE THEY HAD BEEN AGGREGATED BY SERIES
RATHER THAN UNDERLYING SECURITY AND SIDE OF THE MARKET; (2) DURING THE REVIEW PERIOD, BETWEEN JULY 2005 AND SEPTEMBER 2012, THE
FIRM FAILED TO ACCURATELY REPORT CERTAIN REPORTABLE POSITIONS BECAUSE ACCOUNTS OVER WHICH THE FIRM HAD DISCRETION WERE
REPORTED ON AN OMNIBUS BASIS RATHER THAN ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS; AND (3) BETWEEN JANUARY 2010 AND JUNE 2013, THE FIRM MISREPORTED
APPROXIMATELY 3,075 POSITIONS TO LOPR AS A RESULT OF ITS INCORRECT POPULATION OF DATA IN THE ACCOUNT NAME, ACCOUNT ADDRESS, OR
TAX IDENTIFICATION FIELDS. ALL OF THE AFOREMENTIONED INCIDENTS WERE IN VIOLATION OF ISE RULE 415(A). IN ADDITION, DURING THE REVIEW
PERIOD, INGS FAILED TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE SUPERVISORY SYSTEMS AND CONTROLS IN PLACE, INCLUDING ADEQUATE WRITTEN SUPERVISORY
PROCEDURES REASONABLE DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE ACCURATE REPORTING OF REPORTABLE OPTIONS POSITIONS TO LOPR IN VIOLATION OF ISE RULE
401.
8.
Current Status?
Pending
On Appeal
Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
05/22/2015
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 175,000.00
Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
Disgorgement/Restitution
Censure
Cease and Desist/Injunction
Bar
Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
NONE.
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived:
THE FIRM WAS CENSURED AND FINED $175,000.00
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
FINAL PAYMENT PURSUANT TO THE AWC HAS BEEN SENT.regulatory · block 5PDF pages 47–49
- Regulator name — filed text
- NASD
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 100.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Action status / disposition — filed text
INGALLS & SNYDER'S NASDAQ VOLUME WAS ZERO, HOWEVER, A REPORT WAS STILL REQUIRED. TRADERS FORGOT AND WENT HOME.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
FAILURE TO REPORT NASDAQ VOLUME.
Sanction detail — filed text
MONETARY SANCTION IN THE AMOUNT OF $100 PAID NOVEMBER 17, 1980.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE No Information Filed This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) NASD 2. Principal Sanction: Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s) Other Sanctions: 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 11/17/1980 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: Equity - OTC Other Product Types: 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): FAILURE TO REPORT NASDAQ VOLUME. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC) 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 11/17/1980 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 100.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: MONETARY SANCTION IN THE AMOUNT OF $100 PAID NOVEMBER 17, 1980. 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). INGALLS & SNYDER'S NASDAQ VOLUME WAS ZERO, HOWEVER, A REPORT WAS STILL REQUIRED. TRADERS FORGOT AND WENT HOME.
* Metrics are based on the latest available data, including Form ADV filings, brochures, and relationship summaries pulled from the SEC IAPD, and may be subject to change. Learn what is included in the Rialytix data. Please refer to the firm's official disclosures for the most accurate information using their CRD number. This is not investment advice.