Firm profile

J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc..

NEW YORK, NYCRD 107038Registration Status: ApprovedEffective since April 4, 1984SEC # 801-21011Latest ADV August 26, 2026

J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. is an SEC registered investment adviser organized as a corporation with a primary office location in New York, NY.

Assets Under Management
$3.5T
Employees
3,194
Offices
267 offices
Total Clients
128,965

Associated firm names

5 names listed
  • J.P. MORGAN ASSET MANAGEMENT
  • MORGAN J P INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INC
  • JPMORGAN FLEMING ASSET MANAGEMENT
  • JPMORGAN ASSET MANAGEMENT

Leadership

3 roles identified
CEOJohn T. Donohue
CCOJohn L. Oliva
CFOBenjamin Hesse

Advisory services offered

7 types reported
Educational seminars/workshops
Pension consulting services
Portfolio management for businesses

Fee models offered

3 types reported
Asset based fees
Fixed fees
Performance-based fees

Offices & Contact

Primary office

NEW YORK, New York, United States

Loading map…

Primary office regionOther reported regions

Shading shows states and countries with reported offices. Cities are listed below; shading does not indicate service coverage.

New York

NEW YORKPrimary office · BROOKLYN

California

LOS ANGELES · SAN FRANCISCO

Colorado

DENVER

Delaware

NEWARK

Florida

MIAMI

Georgia

ATLANTA · ACWORTH

Illinois

CHICAGO

Indiana

INDIANAPOLIS

Massachusetts

BOSTON

New Jersey

JERSEY CITY

Ohio

COLUMBUS

Oregon

PORTLAND

Texas

DALLAS · PLANO · AUSTIN · HOUSTON

United Kingdom

LONDON

26 office records listed · 267 total offices reported. Counts can use different reporting dates. SEC filers may list only their largest 25 additional offices.

Contact and digital presence

ADV profile links

Regulatory Assets Under Management Breakdown

Total regulatory assets under management$3.5Tas of August 26, 2026
Discretionary99.3%
$3.5T
99% of total RAUM99.3%
Non-discretionary0.7%
$25.0B
1% of total RAUM0.7%
Regulatory assets under management are split between discretionary and non-discretionary assets.

Client Coverage Demographics

Top client segmentRETAIL WRAP CLIENTS represent 97.9% of total clients.
Top client categories% of clientsClients
1
RETAIL WRAP CLIENTS
97.9%
126,256
2
Pension Plans
0.7%
892
3
Corporations
0.4%
461
4
Investment Cos.
0.3%
373
5
Pooled Investment Vehicles
0.2%
305
Additional categories (<0.1%)
Sovereign Wealth41 clients
Banks16 clients
HNWI15 clients

Assets under management Growth by Quarter

Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.

Total AUM$3.5T
Total Accounts132,150
10Y AUM Change+$2.3T (+186.5%)

Private Funds

Private funds reported by J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc..

Loading private fund disclosures…

Employee Growth by Quarter

Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.

Total Employees3,194
Clients per Employee40:1
10Y Employee Change+33 (+1.0%)

Historical AUM and employee figures reflect available SEC Form ADV filings under this CRD. Filing gaps may reflect registration status changes, dormant periods, state registration periods, firm restructuring, or other reporting changes. Rialytix does not interpolate missing periods.


Ownership

Reported direct and indirect ownership ranges

Each range applies to a separate reported relationship and should not be added together.

Reported ownership ranges

Highlighted bands show the percentage range reported in Form ADV.

0%25%50%75%100%
JPMORGAN ASSET MANAGEMENT HOLDINGS INC.Direct owner · Schedule AInterest in J.P. MORGAN INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INC.
75%+
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.Indirect owner · Schedule BInterest in JPMORGAN CHASE HOLDINGS LLC
75%+
JPMORGAN CHASE HOLDINGS LLCIndirect owner · Schedule BInterest in JPMORGAN ASSET MANAGEMENT HOLDINGS INC.
75%+

Bars represent the reported range at that individual ownership step, not an estimated percentage of the advisory firm. Indirect relationships may refer to intermediate entities rather than directly to J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc...

Reported ownership and control details

Form ADV · Filing date 2026-08-26 · Schedules A and B

16 entries
#Owner / person & roleInterest in entityReported interestControl personTitle / status acquiredSource
1GEORGE CROSBY WHITE GATCHDIRECTOR/CHAIRMANIndividualJ.P. MORGAN INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INC.Less than 5%Code NAYesDIRECTOR/CHAIRMAN06/2012Schedule APDF page 1144
2JPMORGAN ASSET MANAGEMENT HOLDINGS INC.SHAREHOLDERDomestic entityJ.P. MORGAN INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INC.75% or moreCode EYesSHAREHOLDER10/2003Schedule APDF page 1144
3PAUL ANTHONY QUINSEEDIRECTOR/HEAD OF GLOBAL EQUITIESIndividualJ.P. MORGAN INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INC.Less than 5%Code NAYesDIRECTOR/HEAD OF GLOBAL EQUITIES03/2006Schedule APDF page 1144
4ANDREW RICHARD POWELLDIRECTOR / AM CAO / HEAD OF GLOBAL CLIENT SERVICE / SENIOR BUSINESS MANAGERIndividualJ.P. MORGAN INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INC.Less than 5%Code NAYesDIRECTOR / AM CAO / HEAD OF GLOBAL CLIENT SERVICE / SENIOR BUSINESS MANAGER02/2015Schedule APDF page 1144
5JOHN THOMAS DONOHUEDIRECTOR / PRESIDENT / CEO / HEAD OF GLOBAL LIQUIDITYIndividualJ.P. MORGAN INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INC.Less than 5%Code NAYesDIRECTOR / PRESIDENT / CEO / HEAD OF GLOBAL LIQUIDITY02/2015Schedule APDF page 1144
6JOY CATHERINE DOWDDIRECTORIndividualJ.P. MORGAN INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INC.Less than 5%Code NAYesDIRECTOR02/2015Schedule APDF page 1144
7ROBERT CHARLES MICHELEDIRECTOR /HEAD OF GLOBAL FIXED INCOME, CURRENCY & COMMODITIESIndividualJ.P. MORGAN INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INC.Less than 5%Code NAYesDIRECTOR /HEAD OF GLOBAL FIXED INCOME, CURRENCY & COMMODITIES02/2015Schedule APDF page 1144
8Anton C PilDIRECTOR / HEAD OF GLOBAL ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENT SOLUTIONSIndividualJ.P. MORGAN INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INC.Less than 5%Code NAYesDIRECTOR / HEAD OF GLOBAL ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENT SOLUTIONS01/2017Schedule APDF page 1144
9Jedediah Isiah M LaskowitzDIRECTOR / HEAD OF GLOBAL PRIVATE MARKETS AND CUSTOMIZED SOLUTIONSIndividualJ.P. MORGAN INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INC.Less than 5%Code NAYesDIRECTOR / HEAD OF GLOBAL PRIVATE MARKETS AND CUSTOMIZED SOLUTIONS12/2019Schedule APDF page 1144
10John L OlivaCHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICERIndividualJ.P. MORGAN INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INC.Less than 5%Code NANoCHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER08/2020Schedule APDF page 1144
11Andrea L LisherDIRECTOR / HEAD OF AMERICAS, CLIENTIndividualJ.P. MORGAN INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INC.Less than 5%Code NAYesDIRECTOR / HEAD OF AMERICAS, CLIENT03/2021Schedule APDF page 1144
12Peter Victor BonannoGENERAL COUNSEL, ASSET MANAGEMENTIndividualJ.P. MORGAN INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INC.Less than 5%Code NANoGENERAL COUNSEL, ASSET MANAGEMENT08/2019Schedule APDF page 1144
13Katherine Gail ManghillisSECRETARYIndividualJ.P. MORGAN INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INC.Less than 5%Code NANoSECRETARY12/2021Schedule APDF page 1144
14BENJAMIN HESSEDIRECTOR / CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER / TREASURERIndividualJ.P. MORGAN INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INC.Less than 5%Code NAYesDIRECTOR / CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER / TREASURER05/2023Schedule APDF page 1144
15JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.100% SHAREHOLDERDomestic entityJPMORGAN CHASE HOLDINGS LLC75% or moreCode EYes100% SHAREHOLDER09/2016Schedule BPDF page 1145
16JPMORGAN CHASE HOLDINGS LLC100% SHAREHOLDERDomestic entityJPMORGAN ASSET MANAGEMENT HOLDINGS INC.75% or moreCode EYes100% SHAREHOLDER04/2017Schedule BPDF page 1145

Less than 5% may include zero. Code F identifies a role without specifying a percentage. Reported interests may overlap and may not include every owner. Total indirect ownership is not calculated.

Compliance & Disclosures

Filing dated 8/26/2026 7:15:47 AM

Responses were selected by the RIA in its filing. Questions are shortened for readability; “you” refers to the reporting firm, and some questions also cover advisory affiliates.

RIA or supervised-person involvementThe RIA reported that one or more events below involve the firm or its supervised persons.RIA responseYes
AFelonies2 Yes

In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:

  • A1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a felony?Yes
  • A2Been charged with a felony?Yes
BMisdemeanors2 No

In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:

  • B1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a misdemeanor involving investments, an investment-related business, fraud, false statements or omissions, wrongful taking of property, bribery, perjury, forgery, counterfeiting, or extortion?No
  • B2Been charged with a misdemeanor of the kind listed above?No
CSEC or CFTC actions4 Yes1 No

Has the SEC or CFTC ever:

  • C1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?Yes
  • C2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated SEC or CFTC regulations or statutes?Yes
  • C3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
  • C4Entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?Yes
  • C5Imposed a civil money penalty on you or an advisory affiliate, or ordered you or an advisory affiliate to cease and desist from any activity?Yes
DOther regulatory actions2 Yes3 No

Has any other federal regulatory agency, state regulatory agency, or foreign financial regulatory authority ever:

  • D1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission, or was dishonest, unfair, or unethical?No
  • D2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related regulations or statutes?Yes
  • D3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
  • D4In the past ten years, entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?Yes
  • D5Denied, suspended, or revoked your or an advisory affiliate’s registration or license, or otherwise prevented association with an investment-related business or restricted activities?No
ESelf-regulatory organization actions4 No

Has a self-regulatory organization or commodities exchange ever:

  • E1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
  • E2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated its rules, other than a violation designated as a minor rule violation under an SEC-approved plan?No
  • E3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
  • E4Disciplined you or an advisory affiliate by expulsion, suspension, barring association with other members, or otherwise restricting activities?No
FProfessional authorizations1 No
  • FHas an authorization to act as an attorney, accountant, or federal contractor granted to you or an advisory affiliate ever been revoked or suspended?No
GPending regulatory proceedings1 No
  • GAre you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a regulatory proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of C, D, or E?No
HCivil judicial actions and proceedings4 No

(1) Court actions

Has a domestic or foreign court:

  • H(1)(a)In the past ten years, enjoined you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
  • H(1)(b)Found that you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related statutes or regulations?No
  • H(1)(c)Dismissed, pursuant to a settlement agreement, an investment-related civil action brought against you or an advisory affiliate by a state or foreign financial regulatory authority?No

(2) Pending civil proceedings

  • H(2)Are you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a civil proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of H(1)?No
Additional DRP filings 11 source blocks

Verbatim excerpts from supporting DRP filings, which may concern the firm or advisory affiliates. Amounts retain their filed labels; no total or attribution is inferred.

criminal · block 1PDF pages 1146–1147
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.A. or
11.B. of Form ADV.
Criminal
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.A(1)
11.A(2)
11.B(1)
11.B(2)
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
Multiple counts of the same charge arising out of the same event(s) should be reported on the same DRP. Unrelated criminal actions, including separate
cases arising out of the same event, must be reported on separate DRPs. Use this DRP to report all charges arising out of the same event. One event may
result in more than one affirmative answer to the items listed above.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  If charge(s) were brought against an organization over which you or an advisory affiliate exercise(d) control: Enter organization name, whether or not
the organization was an investment-related business and your or the advisory affiliate's position, title, or relationship. 
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. ("JPMC")
2.
Formal Charge(s) were brought in: (include name of Federal, Military, State or Foreign Court, Location of Court - City or County and State or Country,
Docket/Case number). 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ("DISTRICT COURT"), 3:15-CR-79 (SRU)
3.
Event Disclosure Detail (Use this for both organizational and individual charges.)
A. Date First Charged (MM/DD/YYYY): 
05/20/2015
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
B.
Event Disclosure Detail (include Charge(s)/Charge Description(s), and for each charge provide: (1) number of counts, (2) felony or misdemeanor,
(3) plea for each charge, and (4) product type if charge is investment-related). 
JPMC WAS CHARGED WITH A ONE COUNT FELONY CRIME CHARGE IN VIOLATION OF THE SHERMAN ANTITRUST ACT, 15 U.S.C. SECTION 1
RELATING TO THE FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE SPOT MARKET ("FX SPOT MARKET"). JPMC PLED GUILTY PURSUANT TO A PLEA AGREEMENT
WITH THE DOJ.
C.
Did any of the Charge(s) within the Event involve a felony? 
 Yes
 No

D.
Current status of the Event? 
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
E.
Event Status Date (complete unless status is Pending) (MM/DD/YYYY): 
01/10/2017
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Disposition Disclosure Detail: 
Include for each charge (a) Disposition Type (e.g., convicted, acquitted, dismissed, pretrial, etc.), (b) Date, (c) Sentence/Penalty, (d) Duration (if
sentence - suspension, probation, etc.), (e) Start Date of Penalty, (f) Penalty/Fine Amount, and (g) Date Paid. 
JPMC ENTERED A GUILTY PLEA ON MAY 20, 2015 PURSUANT TO A PLEA AGREEMENT WITH THE DOJ. JPMC AGREED TO PAY A CRIMINAL FINE OF $550
MILLION AND A MANDATORY ASSESSMENT OF $400. JPMC AGREED TO BE SUBJECT TO PROBATION FOR 3 YEARS. ON JANUARY 10, 2017 JUDGMENT WAS
ENTERED CONSISTENT WITH THE TERMS OF THE PLEA AGREEMENT. THE FINE WAS PAID ON JANUARY 17, 2017.
5.
Provide a brief summary of circumstances leading to the charge(s) as well as the disposition. Include the relevant dates when the conduct which was
the subject of the charge(s) occurred. (Your response must fit within the space provided.) 
ON MAY 20, 2015, THE DOJ FILED A CRIMINAL INFORMATION IN THE DISTRICT COURT CHARGING JPMC WITH A ONE COUNT CRIME CHARGE IN
VIOLATION OF THE SHERMAN ANTITRUST ACT, 15 U.S.C. § 1 (THE "INFORMATION"). THE INFORMATION CHARGES THAT, FROM JULY 2010 UNTIL AT
LEAST JANUARY 2013, JPMC, THROUGH ONE OF ITS EURO/U.S. DOLLAR ("EUR/USD") TRADERS, ENTERED INTO AND ENGAGED IN A CONSPIRACY TO FIX,
STABILIZE, MAINTAIN, INCREASE OR DECREASE THE PRICE OF, AND RIG BIDS AND OFFERS FOR, THE EUR/USD CURRENCY PAIR EXCHANGED IN THE FX
SPOT MARKET BY AGREEING TO ELIMINATE COMPETITION IN THE PURCHASE AND SALE OF THE EUR/USD CURRENCY PAIR IN THE U.S. AND ELSEWHERE.
criminal · block 2PDF pages 1147–1148
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.A. or
11.B. of Form ADV.
Criminal
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.A(1)
11.A(2)
11.B(1)
11.B(2)
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
Multiple counts of the same charge arising out of the same event(s) should be reported on the same DRP. Unrelated criminal actions, including separate
cases arising out of the same event, must be reported on separate DRPs. Use this DRP to report all charges arising out of the same event. One event may
result in more than one affirmative answer to the items listed above.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No

NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  If charge(s) were brought against an organization over which you or an advisory affiliate exercise(d) control: Enter organization name, whether or not
the organization was an investment-related business and your or the advisory affiliate's position, title, or relationship. 
2.
Formal Charge(s) were brought in: (include name of Federal, Military, State or Foreign Court, Location of Court - City or County and State or Country,
Docket/Case number). 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
3.
Event Disclosure Detail (Use this for both organizational and individual charges.)
A. Date First Charged (MM/DD/YYYY): 
09/29/2020
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
B.
Event Disclosure Detail (include Charge(s)/Charge Description(s), and for each charge provide: (1) number of counts, (2) felony or misdemeanor,
(3) plea for each charge, and (4) product type if charge is investment-related). 
2 COUNTS OF WIRE FRAUD, IN VIOLATION OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1343
C.
Did any of the Charge(s) within the Event involve a felony? 
 Yes
 No
D.
Current status of the Event? 
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
E.
Event Status Date (complete unless status is Pending) (MM/DD/YYYY): 
09/29/2020
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Disposition Disclosure Detail: 
Include for each charge (a) Disposition Type (e.g., convicted, acquitted, dismissed, pretrial, etc.), (b) Date, (c) Sentence/Penalty, (d) Duration (if
sentence - suspension, probation, etc.), (e) Start Date of Penalty, (f) Penalty/Fine Amount, and (g) Date Paid. 
DEFERRED PROSECUTION AGREEMENT ~$920MM PENALTY WAS PAID ON OCT. 9TH AND THE FIRM IS REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE OBLIGATIONS
SET FORTH IN THE DEFERRED PROSECUTION AGREEMENT FOR A PERIOD OF 3 YEARS
5.
Provide a brief summary of circumstances leading to the charge(s) as well as the disposition. Include the relevant dates when the conduct which was
the subject of the charge(s) occurred. (Your response must fit within the space provided.)
regulatory · block 1JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.PDF pages 1148–1150
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
Regulator name — filed text
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BUREAU OF SECURITIES REGULATION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 97,706.22
How was matter resolved — filed text
Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE ACTION RELATED TO ALLEGATIONS WITH RESPECT TO MISREPRESENTATIONS AND OMISSIONS IN CONNECTION WITH THE MARKETING, SALE AND DISTRIBUTION OF AUCTION RATE SECURITIES. AS DESCRIBED HEREIN, THE PRINCIPAL TERMS OF THE SETTLEMENT WERE NEGOTIATED WITH THE NYAG AND THE STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION ON BEHALF OF THE NASAA TASK FORCE THAT CONTEMPLATES SEPARATE SIMILAR AGREEMENTS WITH OTHER STATES.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

THE INVESTIGATION CONCERNED ALLEGED MISREPRESENTATIONS AND OMISSIONS IN CONNECTION WITH THE MARKETING, SALE AND DISTRIBUTION OF AUCTION RATE SECURITIES.

Sanction detail — filed text

WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, JPMORGAN CHASE & CO CONSENTED TO A FINE OF $97706.22 WHICH WAS PAID ON 01/04/2017. THE FINE REPRESENTS THE NEW HAMPSHIRE PORTION OF A TOTAL FINE OF $25 MILLION NEGOTIATED WITH THE NYAG AND THE STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION ON BEHALF OF THE NASAA TASK FORCE. THE REMAINING AMOUNT WILL BE PAID SEPARATELY TO OTHER STATES. ALSO PAID WAS $15,000 TO NASAA AS REIMBURSEMENT FOR INVESTIGATIVE COSTS INCURRED BY NASAA.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE

CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE BUREAU OF SECURITIES REGULATION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Restitution
Other Sanctions: 
IN ADDITION TO THE AGREEMENT TO REPURCHASE CERTAIN AUCTION RATE SECURITIES ("ARS") SOLD TO ELIGIBLE INVESTORS PRIOR TO FEBRUARY
13, 2008, THE SETTLEMENT CALLS FOR THE REIMBURSEMENT OF ELIGIBLE INVESTORS WHO SOLD ARS BELOW PAR, REFUNDING OF CERTAIN LOAN
EXPENSES INCURRED BY ELIGIBLE INVESTORS, SPECIAL ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS CONCERNING CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES WITH RESPECT TO
ARS, REFUNDING CERTAIN REFINANCING FEES INCURRED BY MUNICIPAL ISSUERS OF ARS AND A CIVIL PENALTY.
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
01/03/2017
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
12009000013
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other
Other Product Types: 
AUCTION RATE SECURITIES
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE INVESTIGATION CONCERNED ALLEGED MISREPRESENTATIONS AND OMISSIONS IN CONNECTION WITH THE MARKETING, SALE AND DISTRIBUTION
OF AUCTION RATE SECURITIES.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:

Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
01/03/2017
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 97,706.22
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
IN ADDITION TO THE AGREEMENT TO REPURCHASE CERTAIN AUCTION RATE SECURITIES ("ARS") SOLD TO ELIGIBLE INVESTORS PRIOR TO
FEBRUARY 13, 2008, THE SETTLEMENT CALLS FOR THE REIMBURSEMENT OF ELIGIBLE INVESTORS WHO SOLD ARS BELOW PAR, REFUNDING OF
CERTAIN LOAN EXPENSES INCURRED BY ELIGIBLE INVESTORS, SPECIAL ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS CONCERNING CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES
WITH RESPECT TO ARS, REFUNDING CERTAIN REFINANCING FEES INCURRED BY MUNICIPAL ISSUERS OF ARS AND A CIVIL PENALTY.
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, JPMORGAN CHASE & CO CONSENTED TO A FINE OF $97706.22 WHICH WAS PAID ON
01/04/2017. THE FINE REPRESENTS THE NEW HAMPSHIRE PORTION OF A TOTAL FINE OF $25 MILLION NEGOTIATED WITH THE NYAG AND THE
STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION ON BEHALF OF THE NASAA TASK FORCE. THE REMAINING AMOUNT WILL BE PAID
SEPARATELY TO OTHER STATES. ALSO PAID WAS $15,000 TO NASAA AS REIMBURSEMENT FOR INVESTIGATIVE COSTS INCURRED BY NASAA.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE ACTION RELATED TO ALLEGATIONS WITH RESPECT TO MISREPRESENTATIONS AND OMISSIONS IN CONNECTION WITH THE MARKETING, SALE AND
DISTRIBUTION OF AUCTION RATE SECURITIES. AS DESCRIBED HEREIN, THE PRINCIPAL TERMS OF THE SETTLEMENT WERE NEGOTIATED WITH THE NYAG
AND THE STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION ON BEHALF OF THE NASAA TASK FORCE THAT CONTEMPLATES SEPARATE SIMILAR
AGREEMENTS WITH OTHER STATES.
regulatory · block 2JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.PDF pages 1150–1152
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
Regulator name — filed text
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
How was matter resolved — filed text
Settled

Action status / disposition — filed text

SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF SETTLING THESE PROCEEDINGS, JPMC ADMITTED THE SEC'S JURISDICTION AND THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THESE PROCEEDINGS AND CONSENTED TO THE ORDER. THE ALLEGATIONS, DISPOSITIONS, FINDINGS AND SANCTIONS OF THE ORDER ARE DESCRIBED ABOVE IN ITEMS 7 AND 12. IN COORDINATION WITH THE SEC SETTLEMENT, JPMC AND CERTAIN OF ITS AFFILIATES ALSO ENTERED INTO SETTLEMENTS WITH OTHER AGENCIES TO RESOLVE CONCURRENT INVESTIGATIONS ARISING OUT OF THE SAME CONDUCT. THOSE SETTLEMENTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: JPMORGAN APAC ENTERED INTO A NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE THAT ACKNOWLEDGES RESPONSIBILITY FOR CRIMINAL CONDUCT RELATING TO CERTAIN FINDINGS IN THE ORDER AND THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM ENTERED AN ADMINISTRATIVE CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER AGAINST JPMC.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

ON NOVEMBER 17, 2016, JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. ("JPMC") ENTERED INTO A SETTLEMENT WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ("SEC") UNDER WHICH JPMC CONSENTED TO THE ENTRY OF AN ORDER (THE "ORDER") THAT FINDS THAT JPMC VIOLATED SECTIONS 13(B)(2)(A), 13(B) (2)(B) AND 30A OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 ("EXCHANGE ACT"). THE ORDER FINDS THAT JPMC VIOLATED THE ANTI-BRIBERY PROVISIONS OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS BY CORRUPTLY PROVIDING VALUABLE INTERNSHIPS AND EMPLOYMENT TO RELATIVES AND FRIENDS OF FOREIGN GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS ("REFERRAL HIRES") IN ORDER TO ASSIST JPMC IN RETAINING AND OBTAINING BUSINESS. IN ADDITION, THE ORDER FINDS THAT JPMC VIOLATED THE BOOKS AND RECORDS PROVISIONS AND THE INTERNAL ACCOUNTING CONTROLS PROVISIONS OF THE FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT ("FCPA") IN CONJUNCTION WITH CERTAIN REFERRAL HIRES.

Sanction detail — filed text

THE ORDER DIRECTS JPMC TO CEASE-AND-DESIST FROM COMMITTING OR CAUSING ANY VIOLATIONS AND ANY FUTURE VIOLATIONS OF THE ABOVE-ENUMERATED STATUTORY PROVISIONS. ADDITIONALLY, THE ORDER REQUIRES JPMC TO PAY A TOTAL OF $105,507,668 IN DISGORGEMENT AND PREJUDGMENT INTEREST OF $25,083,737, WHICH WAS PAID ON NOVEMBER 27, 2016. IN ADDITION, JPMC WAS ORDERED TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS, INCLUDING REPORTING TO THE SEC STAFF PERIODICALLY, AT NO LESS THAN NINE-MONTH INTERVALS DURING A THREE-YEAR TERM, THE STATUS OF JPMC'S REMEDIATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPLIANCE MEASURES RELATING TO FCPA AND APPLICABLE ANTI-CORRUPTION LAWS, AND CERTIFYING THAT JPMC HAS MADE A GOOD FAITH EFFORT TO COMPLY WITH THE UNDERTAKINGS. THE SEC DID NOT IMPOSE A CIVIL PENALTY BASED UPON THE IMPOSITION OF A $72,000,000 CRIMINAL FINE AS PART OF JPMORGAN SECURITIES (ASIA PACIFIC) LIMITED'S ("JPMORGAN APAC") SETTLEMENT WITH THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE

CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Cease and Desist
Other Sanctions: 
DISGORGEMENT, PRE-JUDGMENT INTEREST, AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
11/17/2016
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING FILE NO. 3-17684
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
ON NOVEMBER 17, 2016, JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. ("JPMC") ENTERED INTO A SETTLEMENT WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
("SEC") UNDER WHICH JPMC CONSENTED TO THE ENTRY OF AN ORDER (THE "ORDER") THAT FINDS THAT JPMC VIOLATED SECTIONS 13(B)(2)(A), 13(B)
(2)(B) AND 30A OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 ("EXCHANGE ACT"). THE ORDER FINDS THAT JPMC VIOLATED THE ANTI-BRIBERY
PROVISIONS OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS BY CORRUPTLY PROVIDING VALUABLE INTERNSHIPS AND EMPLOYMENT TO RELATIVES AND FRIENDS
OF FOREIGN GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS ("REFERRAL HIRES") IN ORDER TO ASSIST JPMC IN RETAINING AND OBTAINING BUSINESS. IN ADDITION, THE
ORDER FINDS THAT JPMC VIOLATED THE BOOKS AND RECORDS PROVISIONS AND THE INTERNAL ACCOUNTING CONTROLS PROVISIONS OF THE
FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT ("FCPA") IN CONJUNCTION WITH CERTAIN REFERRAL HIRES.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:

Settled
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
11/17/2016
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
THE ORDER DIRECTS JPMC TO CEASE-AND-DESIST FROM COMMITTING OR CAUSING ANY VIOLATIONS AND ANY FUTURE VIOLATIONS OF THE
ABOVE-ENUMERATED STATUTORY PROVISIONS. ADDITIONALLY, THE ORDER REQUIRES JPMC TO PAY A TOTAL OF $105,507,668 IN
DISGORGEMENT AND PREJUDGMENT INTEREST OF $25,083,737, WHICH WAS PAID ON NOVEMBER 27, 2016. IN ADDITION, JPMC WAS ORDERED
TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS, INCLUDING REPORTING TO THE SEC STAFF PERIODICALLY, AT NO LESS THAN NINE-MONTH
INTERVALS DURING A THREE-YEAR TERM, THE STATUS OF JPMC'S REMEDIATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPLIANCE MEASURES RELATING TO
FCPA AND APPLICABLE ANTI-CORRUPTION LAWS, AND CERTIFYING THAT JPMC HAS MADE A GOOD FAITH EFFORT TO COMPLY WITH THE
UNDERTAKINGS. THE SEC DID NOT IMPOSE A CIVIL PENALTY BASED UPON THE IMPOSITION OF A $72,000,000 CRIMINAL FINE AS PART OF
JPMORGAN SECURITIES (ASIA PACIFIC) LIMITED'S ("JPMORGAN APAC") SETTLEMENT WITH THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF SETTLING THESE PROCEEDINGS, JPMC ADMITTED THE SEC'S JURISDICTION AND THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THESE
PROCEEDINGS AND CONSENTED TO THE ORDER. THE ALLEGATIONS, DISPOSITIONS, FINDINGS AND SANCTIONS OF THE ORDER ARE DESCRIBED ABOVE
IN ITEMS 7 AND 12. IN COORDINATION WITH THE SEC SETTLEMENT, JPMC AND CERTAIN OF ITS AFFILIATES ALSO ENTERED INTO SETTLEMENTS WITH
OTHER AGENCIES TO RESOLVE CONCURRENT INVESTIGATIONS ARISING OUT OF THE SAME CONDUCT. THOSE SETTLEMENTS ARE AS FOLLOWS:
JPMORGAN APAC ENTERED INTO A NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE THAT ACKNOWLEDGES RESPONSIBILITY FOR
CRIMINAL CONDUCT RELATING TO CERTAIN FINDINGS IN THE ORDER AND THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM ENTERED AN
ADMINISTRATIVE CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER AGAINST JPMC.
regulatory · block 3JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.PDF pages 1152–1154
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
Regulator name — filed text
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 61,932,500.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Settled

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE ALLEGATIONS, DISPOSITIONS, FINDINGS AND SANCTIONS OF THE ORDER ARE DESCRIBED ABOVE IN ITEMS 7 AND 12. IN COORDINATION WITH THE FRB SETTLEMENT, JPMC AND CERTAIN OF ITS AFFILIATES ALSO ENTERED INTO SETTLEMENTS WITH OTHER AGENCIES TO RESOLVE CONCURRENT INVESTIGATIONS ARISING OUT OF THE SAME CONDUCT. THOSE SETTLEMENTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: JPMORGAN APAC ENTERED INTO A NON- PROSECUTION AGREEMENT WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND CONSENTED TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CRIMINAL FINE FOR VIOLATIONS OF FEDERAL ANTI-BRIBERY LAWS AND THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ENTERED AN ADMINISTRATIVE CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER AGAINST JPMC FINDING VIOLATIONS OF FEDERAL ANTI-BRIBERY AND SECURITIES LAWS.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

ON NOVEMBER 17, 2016, JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. ("JPMC") ENTERED INTO A SETTLEMENT WITH THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM ("FRB") RESULTING IN THE FRB ISSUING AN ORDER ("ORDER"). THE ORDER FINDS THAT FROM AT LEAST 2008 THROUGH 2013, JPMC'S ASIA- PACIFIC REGION INVESTMENT BANKING GROUP OPERATED A REFERRAL HIRING PROGRAM WHEREBY CANDIDATES WHO WERE REFERRED, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, BY FOREIGN GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS AND EXISTING OR PROSPECTIVE COMMERCIAL CLIENTS, AND WHO IN MOST INSTANCES WERE LESS QUALIFIED THAN NON-REFERRED CANDIDATES WHO WERE HIRED THROUGH THE JPMC'S STANDARD HIRING PROGRAMS, WERE OFFERED INTERNSHIPS, TRAINING, AND OTHER EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN ORDER TO OBTAIN IMPROPER BUSINESS ADVANTAGES FOR JPMC.

Sanction detail — filed text

THE ORDER DIRECTS JPMC TO CEASE-AND-DESIST AND TO PAY A CIVIL MONEY PENALTY OF $61,932,500, WHICH WAS PAID ON NOVEMBER 17, 2016. IN ADDITION, THE ORDER REQUIRES JPMC TO TAKE THE FOLLOWING STEPS: A) SUBMIT AN ACCEPTABLE WRITTEN PLAN, AND TIMELINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION, TO IMPROVE SENIOR MANAGEMENT'S OVERSIGHT OF JPMC'S FIRM-WIDE COMPLIANCE RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM WITH REGARD TO COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE U.S. LAWS AND REGULATIONS AND APPLICABLE INTERNAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES IN CONNECTION WITH THE FIRM'S HIRING OF CANDIDATES WHO WERE REFERRED, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, BY FOREIGN GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS AND EXISTING OR PROSPECTIVE COMMERCIAL CLIENTS ("REFERRAL HIRING PRACTICES"); B) SUBMIT AN ACCEPTABLE WRITTEN PLAN, AND TIMELINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION, TO ENHANCE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF JPMC'S FIRM-WIDE COMPLIANCE RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM WITH REGARD TO THE OVERSIGHT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF ANTI-BRIBERY PROCESSES AND PROCEDURES IN CONNECTION WITH THE FIRM'S REFERRAL HIRING PRACTICES; AND C) SUBMIT AN ACCEPTABLE WRITTEN PLAN, AND TIMELINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION, TO ENHANCE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE FIRM'S COMPLIANCE WITH INTERNAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES AS WELL AS APPLICABLE U.S. LAWS AND REGULATIONS IN ITS REFERRAL HIRING PRACTICES.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 

If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
2.
Principal Sanction:
Cease and Desist
Other Sanctions: 
CIVIL MONEY PENALTY AND UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
11/17/2016
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
16-22-B-HC AND 16-22-CMP-HC
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
ON NOVEMBER 17, 2016, JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. ("JPMC") ENTERED INTO A SETTLEMENT WITH THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE
SYSTEM ("FRB") RESULTING IN THE FRB ISSUING AN ORDER ("ORDER"). THE ORDER FINDS THAT FROM AT LEAST 2008 THROUGH 2013, JPMC'S ASIA-
PACIFIC REGION INVESTMENT BANKING GROUP OPERATED A REFERRAL HIRING PROGRAM WHEREBY CANDIDATES WHO WERE REFERRED, DIRECTLY OR
INDIRECTLY, BY FOREIGN GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS AND EXISTING OR PROSPECTIVE COMMERCIAL CLIENTS, AND WHO IN MOST INSTANCES WERE LESS
QUALIFIED THAN NON-REFERRED CANDIDATES WHO WERE HIRED THROUGH THE JPMC'S STANDARD HIRING PROGRAMS, WERE OFFERED INTERNSHIPS,
TRAINING, AND OTHER EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN ORDER TO OBTAIN IMPROPER BUSINESS ADVANTAGES FOR JPMC.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.

10. How was matter resolved:
Settled
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
11/17/2016
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 61,932,500.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
THE ORDER DIRECTS JPMC TO CEASE-AND-DESIST AND TO PAY A CIVIL MONEY PENALTY OF $61,932,500, WHICH WAS PAID ON NOVEMBER 17,
2016. IN ADDITION, THE ORDER REQUIRES JPMC TO TAKE THE FOLLOWING STEPS: A) SUBMIT AN ACCEPTABLE WRITTEN PLAN, AND TIMELINE
FOR IMPLEMENTATION, TO IMPROVE SENIOR MANAGEMENT'S OVERSIGHT OF JPMC'S FIRM-WIDE COMPLIANCE RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
WITH REGARD TO COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE U.S. LAWS AND REGULATIONS AND APPLICABLE INTERNAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES IN
CONNECTION WITH THE FIRM'S HIRING OF CANDIDATES WHO WERE REFERRED, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, BY FOREIGN GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
AND EXISTING OR PROSPECTIVE COMMERCIAL CLIENTS ("REFERRAL HIRING PRACTICES"); B) SUBMIT AN ACCEPTABLE WRITTEN PLAN, AND
TIMELINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION, TO ENHANCE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF JPMC'S FIRM-WIDE COMPLIANCE RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM WITH
REGARD TO THE OVERSIGHT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF ANTI-BRIBERY PROCESSES AND PROCEDURES IN CONNECTION WITH THE FIRM'S
REFERRAL HIRING PRACTICES; AND C) SUBMIT AN ACCEPTABLE WRITTEN PLAN, AND TIMELINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION, TO ENHANCE THE
EFFECTIVENESS OF THE FIRM'S COMPLIANCE WITH INTERNAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES AS WELL AS APPLICABLE U.S. LAWS AND
REGULATIONS IN ITS REFERRAL HIRING PRACTICES.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE ALLEGATIONS, DISPOSITIONS, FINDINGS AND SANCTIONS OF THE ORDER ARE DESCRIBED ABOVE IN ITEMS 7 AND 12. IN COORDINATION WITH
THE FRB SETTLEMENT, JPMC AND CERTAIN OF ITS AFFILIATES ALSO ENTERED INTO SETTLEMENTS WITH OTHER AGENCIES TO RESOLVE CONCURRENT
INVESTIGATIONS ARISING OUT OF THE SAME CONDUCT. THOSE SETTLEMENTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: JPMORGAN APAC ENTERED INTO A NON-
PROSECUTION AGREEMENT WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND CONSENTED TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CRIMINAL FINE FOR VIOLATIONS OF
FEDERAL ANTI-BRIBERY LAWS AND THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ENTERED AN ADMINISTRATIVE CEASE-AND-DESIST ORDER
AGAINST JPMC FINDING VIOLATIONS OF FEDERAL ANTI-BRIBERY AND SECURITIES LAWS.
regulatory · block 4JPMORGAN ASSET MANAGEMENT (TAIWAN) LIMITEDPDF pages 1154–1156
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
JPMORGAN ASSET MANAGEMENT (TAIWAN) LIMITED
Regulator name — filed text
TAIWAN FINANCIAL SUPERVISORY COMMISSION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 40,900.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Decision

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE ALLEGED CONDUCT DOES NOT RELATE IN ANY WAY TO THE REGISTRANT'S INVESTMENT ADVISER BUSINESS. THE ALLEGATIONS, DISPOSITIONS, FINDINGS AND SANCTIONS OF THE SANCTION ARE DESCRIBED ABOVE IN ITEMS 7 AND 12.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

ON FEBRUARY 5, 2018, THE TAIWAN FINANCIAL SUPERVISORY COMMISSION ("FSC") ISSUED A PUBLIC NOTICE OF ITS IMPOSITION OF A SANCTION OF RECTIFICATION AND AN ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY ("SANCTION") AGAINST JPMORGAN ASSET MANAGEMENT (TAIWAN) LIMITED ("JPMAM TAIWAN") BECAUSE JPMAM TAIWAN, HAD NOT EFFECTIVELY ESTABLISHED A MECHANISM TO REVIEW TRAINING AND MARKETING EVENTS AND TO APPROVE AND REPORT EXPENSES. THE SANCTION IMPOSED AN ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY UNDER ARTICLE 2(2) OF THE REGULATIONS GOVERNING SECURITIES INVESTMENT TRUST ENTERPRISES, ARTICLE 13 OF REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL AND BUSINESS PERSONNEL OF SECURITIES INVESTMENT TRUST ENTERPRISES, ARTICLE 6(2) OF THE STANDARDS GOVERNING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF INTERNAL CONTROL SYSTEMS BY SERVICE ENTERPRISES IN SECURITIES AND FUTURES MARKETS, AS WELL AS ARTICLES 102 AND 111(7) OF THE SECURITIES INVESTMENT TRUST AND CONSULTING ACT. THE FSC DETERMINED THAT JPMAM TAIWAN HAD NOT IMPLEMENTED EFFECTIVE INTERNAL CONTROL SYSTEMS AND ADEQUATELY SUPERVISED ITS EMPLOYEES.

Sanction detail — filed text

IN THE SANCTION, JPMAM TAIWAN WAS REQUIRED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY NT$1.2 MILLION (~USD 40,900), WHICH IT PAID ON FEBRUARY 13, 2018.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates

One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
JPMORGAN ASSET
MANAGEMENT (TAIWAN)
LIMITED
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
TAIWAN FINANCIAL SUPERVISORY COMMISSION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
RECTIFICATION
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
02/05/2018
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
N/A
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other
Other Product Types: 
FINANCE AND COMPLIANCE CONTROLS
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
ON FEBRUARY 5, 2018, THE TAIWAN FINANCIAL SUPERVISORY COMMISSION ("FSC") ISSUED A PUBLIC NOTICE OF ITS IMPOSITION OF A SANCTION OF
RECTIFICATION AND AN ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY ("SANCTION") AGAINST JPMORGAN ASSET MANAGEMENT (TAIWAN) LIMITED ("JPMAM TAIWAN")
BECAUSE JPMAM TAIWAN, HAD NOT EFFECTIVELY ESTABLISHED A MECHANISM TO REVIEW TRAINING AND MARKETING EVENTS AND TO APPROVE AND
REPORT EXPENSES. THE SANCTION IMPOSED AN ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY UNDER ARTICLE 2(2) OF THE REGULATIONS GOVERNING SECURITIES
INVESTMENT TRUST ENTERPRISES, ARTICLE 13 OF REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL AND BUSINESS PERSONNEL OF
SECURITIES INVESTMENT TRUST ENTERPRISES, ARTICLE 6(2) OF THE STANDARDS GOVERNING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF INTERNAL CONTROL SYSTEMS

BY SERVICE ENTERPRISES IN SECURITIES AND FUTURES MARKETS, AS WELL AS ARTICLES 102 AND 111(7) OF THE SECURITIES INVESTMENT TRUST AND
CONSULTING ACT. THE FSC DETERMINED THAT JPMAM TAIWAN HAD NOT IMPLEMENTED EFFECTIVE INTERNAL CONTROL SYSTEMS AND ADEQUATELY
SUPERVISED ITS EMPLOYEES.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Decision
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
02/05/2018
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 40,900.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
JPMAM TAIWAN SHALL (1) IMPLEMENT REMEDIAL MEASURES APPROVED BY ITS BOARD OF DIRECTORS, AND REGULARLY REPORT ON THE
PROGRESS TO THE BOARD SUPERVISOR; (2) ENGAGE AN ACCOUNTING FIRM TO REVIEW THE COMPANY'S IMPLEMENTATION OF ITS INTERNAL
CONTROL ENHANCEMENTS; AND (3) UNTIL THE CONTROLS REVIEW IS COMPLETE AND THE FSC IS SATISFIED THAT THE NOTED DEFICIENCIES
HAVE BEEN REMEDIATED, THE FSC WILL NOT ACCEPT FROM JPMAM TAIWAN APPLICATIONS OR REPORTS OF ONSHORE FUND OFFERINGS OR
PLACEMENTS (INCLUDING FOLLOW-ON OFFERINGS / PLACEMENTS) AND OFFSHORE FUNDS SALES CASES.
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
IN THE SANCTION, JPMAM TAIWAN WAS REQUIRED TO PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY NT$1.2 MILLION (~USD 40,900), WHICH IT PAID ON
FEBRUARY 13, 2018.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE ALLEGED CONDUCT DOES NOT RELATE IN ANY WAY TO THE REGISTRANT'S INVESTMENT ADVISER BUSINESS. THE ALLEGATIONS, DISPOSITIONS,
FINDINGS AND SANCTIONS OF THE SANCTION ARE DESCRIBED ABOVE IN ITEMS 7 AND 12.
Show 5 more source blocks
regulatory · block 5JPMORGAN ASSET MANAGEMENT (ASIA PACIFIC) LIMITEDPDF pages 1156–1158
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
JPMORGAN ASSET MANAGEMENT (ASIA PACIFIC) LIMITED
Regulator name — filed text
SECURITIES EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 7,500.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Other

Action status / disposition — filed text

ON MARCH 5, 2019 THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ("SEBI") PASSED A SETTLEMENT ORDER REGARDING THE LATE APPLICATION TO ACQUIRE SHARES IN MULTI COMMODITY EXCHANGE OF INDIA LIMITED ("MCX"), A RECOGNIZED STOCK EXCHANGE IN INDIA. PURSUANT TO REGULATION 19(2) OF THE SECURITIES CONTRACTS (REGULATION) (STOCK EXCHANGES AND CLEARING CORPORATIONS) REGULATIONS, 2012 RESCINDED AND REPLACED WITH SECURITIES CONTRACTS (REGULATION) (STOCK EXCHANGES AND CLEARING CORPORATIONS) REGULATIONS, 2018, JFAML WAS REQUIRED TO APPLY FOR SEBI'S APPROVAL WITHIN FIFTEEN DAYS OF ITS AGGREGATED SHAREHOLDING REPRESENTING GREATER THAN 2% OF MCX. JFAML, ON BEHALF OF CERTAIN CLIENT ACCOUNTS, ACQUIRED SHARES REPRESENTING IN AGGREGATE GREATER THAN 2% OF MCX ON JANUARY 27, 2017 AND, UPON REALIZING THE INADVERTENT OMISSION IN SEEKING APPROVAL FROM SEBI, JFAML SUBMITTED THE APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL ON FEBRUARY 28, 2018. SEBI GRANTED APPROVAL ON APRIL 23, 2018. ON JANUARY 15, 2019 SEBI ISSUED A NOTICE OF SUMMARY SETTLEMENT REGARDING THE ABOVE MATTER. ON FEBRUARY 11, 2019, JFAML ACCEPTED THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND PAID THE SETTLEMENT AMOUNT OF 515,625 RUPEES (APPROXIMATELY $7,500).
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ("SEBI") ALLEGED THAT JF ASSET MANAGEMENT LIMITED ("JFAML") (NOW KNOWN AS JPMORGAN ASSET MANAGEMENT (ASIA PACIFIC) LIMITED) VIOLATED REGULATION 19(2) OF THE SECURITIES CONTRACTS (REGULATION) (STOCK EXCHANGES AND CLEARING CORPORATIONS) REGULATIONS, 2012 RESCINDED AND REPLACED WITH SECURITIES CONTRACTS (REGULATION) (STOCK EXCHANGES AND CLEARING CORPORATIONS) REGULATIONS, 2018.

Sanction detail — filed text

ON FEBRUARY 11, 2019, JFAML ACCEPTED THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND PAID THE SETTLEMENT AMOUNT OF 15,625 RUPEES (APPROXIMATELY $7,500).
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)

You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
300114
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
JPMORGAN ASSET
MANAGEMENT (ASIA PACIFIC)
LIMITED
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
SECURITIES EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
01/15/2019
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
N/A
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ("SEBI") ALLEGED THAT JF ASSET MANAGEMENT LIMITED ("JFAML") (NOW KNOWN AS JPMORGAN
ASSET MANAGEMENT (ASIA PACIFIC) LIMITED) VIOLATED REGULATION 19(2) OF THE SECURITIES CONTRACTS (REGULATION) (STOCK EXCHANGES AND
CLEARING CORPORATIONS) REGULATIONS, 2012 RESCINDED AND REPLACED WITH SECURITIES CONTRACTS (REGULATION) (STOCK EXCHANGES AND
CLEARING CORPORATIONS) REGULATIONS, 2018.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final

9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Other
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
03/05/2019
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 7,500.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
ON FEBRUARY 11, 2019, JFAML ACCEPTED THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND PAID THE SETTLEMENT AMOUNT OF 15,625 RUPEES
(APPROXIMATELY $7,500).
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON MARCH 5, 2019 THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ("SEBI") PASSED A SETTLEMENT ORDER REGARDING THE LATE APPLICATION TO
ACQUIRE SHARES IN MULTI COMMODITY EXCHANGE OF INDIA LIMITED ("MCX"), A RECOGNIZED STOCK EXCHANGE IN INDIA. PURSUANT TO
REGULATION 19(2) OF THE SECURITIES CONTRACTS (REGULATION) (STOCK EXCHANGES AND CLEARING CORPORATIONS) REGULATIONS, 2012
RESCINDED AND REPLACED WITH SECURITIES CONTRACTS (REGULATION) (STOCK EXCHANGES AND CLEARING CORPORATIONS) REGULATIONS, 2018,
JFAML WAS REQUIRED TO APPLY FOR SEBI'S APPROVAL WITHIN FIFTEEN DAYS OF ITS AGGREGATED SHAREHOLDING REPRESENTING GREATER THAN 2%
OF MCX. JFAML, ON BEHALF OF CERTAIN CLIENT ACCOUNTS, ACQUIRED SHARES REPRESENTING IN AGGREGATE GREATER THAN 2% OF MCX ON
JANUARY 27, 2017 AND, UPON REALIZING THE INADVERTENT OMISSION IN SEEKING APPROVAL FROM SEBI, JFAML SUBMITTED THE APPLICATION FOR
APPROVAL ON FEBRUARY 28, 2018. SEBI GRANTED APPROVAL ON APRIL 23, 2018. ON JANUARY 15, 2019 SEBI ISSUED A NOTICE OF SUMMARY
SETTLEMENT REGARDING THE ABOVE MATTER. ON FEBRUARY 11, 2019, JFAML ACCEPTED THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND PAID THE SETTLEMENT
AMOUNT OF 515,625 RUPEES (APPROXIMATELY $7,500).
regulatory · block 6JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.PDF pages 1158–1160
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
Regulator name — filed text
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 436,431,811.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Settled

Action status / disposition — filed text

RESPONDENTS JPM HAVE SUBMITTED AN OFFER OF SETTLEMENT, WHICH THE COMMISSION HAS DETERMINED TO ACCEPT. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT JPM SHALL CEASE AND DESIST FROM VIOLATING SECTIONS 4C(A)(5)(C), 6(C)(1), 6(C)(3), AND 9(A)(2) OF THE ACT AND REGULATIONS 180.1(A)(1) AND (3) AND 180.2, AND THE BROKER-DEALER SHALL CEASE AND DESIST FROM VIOLATING REGULATION 166.3. THE BROKER-DEALER SHALL PAY RESTITUTION OF ONE HUNDRED FIVE MILLION SEVEN HUNDRED FORTY-FOUR THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED SIX DOLLARS ($105,744,906), JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY WITH JPMC & CO; A CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY OF FOUR HUNDRED THIRTY-SIX MILLION FOUR HUNDRED THIRTY-ONE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED ELEVEN DOLLARS ($436,431,811), JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY WITH THE BANK AND JPMC & CO; DISGORGEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF FIFTY ONE MILLION SEVEN HUNDRED TWO THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED SIXTY DOLLARS ($51,702,360), JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY WITH JPMC & CO; ADDITIONALLY, THE BANK AND JPMC & CO SHALL PAY TWO HUNDRED FIVE MILLION NINE HUNDRED NINETY-TWO THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED TWO DOLLARS ($205,992,102) IN RESITUTION AND ONE HUNDRED TWENTY MILLION THREE HUNDRED THIRTY-TWO THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED THIRTY DOLLARS ($120,332,430) IN DISGORGEMENT, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY; JPM SHALL COMPLY WITH THE UNDERTAKINGS SET FORTH IN THE ORDER.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

THE CFTC ENTERED AN ORDER RESOLVING AN ACTION AGAINST JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., AN AFFILIATED BANK (THE "BANK") AND AN AFFILIATED BROKER-DEALER (THE "BROKER-DEALER") (COLLECTIVELY, "JPM"). ACCORDING TO THE ORDER, FROM AT LEAST 2008 THROUGH 2016, NUMEROUS TRADERS ON THE PRECIOUS METALS AND U.S. TREASURIES TRADING DESKS AT THE BANK AND THE BROKER-DEALER ENGAGED IN A MANIPULATIVE AND DECEPTIVE SCHEME BY ENGAGING IN THE PRACTICE OF "SPOOFING" (BIDDING OR OFFERING WITH THE INTENT TO CANCEL THE BID OR OFFER BEFORE EXECUTION) WHILE PLACING ORDERS FOR FUTURES CONTRACTS ON A REGISTERED ENTITY, RESULTING IN SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT TO THEMSELVES AND HARM TO OTHER MARKET PARTICIPANTS. BY VIRTUE OF THIS CONDUCT, JPM ENGAGED IN MANIPULATION AND ATTEMPTED MANIPULATION IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 9(A)(2) OF THE ACT, 7 U.S.C. § 13(A)(2) (2018); FOR CONDUCT OCCURRING ON OR AFTER JULY 16, 2011, ENGAGED IN SPOOFING IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 4C(A)(5)(C) OF THE ACT, 7 U.S.C. § 6C(A)(5)(C) (2018); AND FOR CONDUCT OCCURRING ON OR AFTER AUGUST 15, 2011, ENGAGED IN MANIPULATION AND ATTEMPTED MANIPULATION IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 6(C)(1) AND 6(C)(3) OF THE ACT, 7 U.S.C. § 9(1), , , ( )( ) ( )( ) , § ( ), (3) (2018), AND REGULATIONS 180.1(A)(1) AND (3) AND 180.2, 17 C.F.R. §§ 180.1(A)(1), (3), 180.2 (2019). FURTHER, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE ABOVE-REFERENCED MISCONDUCT, THE BROKER-DEALER FAILED TO DILIGENTLY SUPERVISE IN VIOLATION OF COMMISSION REGULATION 166.3, 17 C.F.R. § 166.3 (2019). THE BANK AND THE BROKER­DEALER DO NOT CONTROL, NOR ARE THEY CONTROLLED BY, THE ADVISER.

Sanction detail — filed text

THE ORDER DIRECTS JPM TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM VIOLATING SECTIONS 4C(A)(5)(C), 6(C)(1), 6(C) (3), AND 9(A)(2) OF THE ACT, 7 U.S.C. §§ 6C(A)(5)(C), 9(1), (3), 13(A)(2) (2018), AND REGULATIONS 180.1(A)(1) AND (3) AND 180.2, 17 C.F.R. §§ 180.1(A)(1), (3), 180.2 (2019). ADDITIONALLY, THE ORDER REQUIRES THE BANK AND JPMC & CO. TO PAY RESTITUTION IN THE AMOUNT OF $205,992,102, AND THE BROKER- DEALER AND JPMC & CO. TO PAY ADDITIONAL RESTITUTION IN THE AMOUNT OF $105,744,906. THE ORDER FURTHER REQUIRES JPM TO PAY A CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $436,431,811. THE ORDER ALSO REQUIRES THE BANK AND JPMC & CO. TO PAY DISGORGEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $120,332,430 AND THE BROKER-DEALER AND JPMC & CO. TO PAY DISGORGEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $51,702,360.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates

One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
UNDERTAKINGS
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
09/29/2020
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
CFTC DOCKET NO. 20-69
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Futures - Commodity
Other Product Types: 
PRECIOUS METALS, FUTURES CONTRACTS, AND U.S. TREASURY FUTURES
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE CFTC ENTERED AN ORDER RESOLVING AN ACTION AGAINST JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., AN AFFILIATED BANK (THE "BANK") AND AN AFFILIATED
BROKER-DEALER (THE "BROKER-DEALER") (COLLECTIVELY, "JPM"). ACCORDING TO THE ORDER, FROM AT LEAST 2008 THROUGH 2016, NUMEROUS
TRADERS ON THE PRECIOUS METALS AND U.S. TREASURIES TRADING DESKS AT THE BANK AND THE BROKER-DEALER ENGAGED IN A MANIPULATIVE AND
DECEPTIVE SCHEME BY ENGAGING IN THE PRACTICE OF "SPOOFING" (BIDDING OR OFFERING WITH THE INTENT TO CANCEL THE BID OR OFFER BEFORE
EXECUTION) WHILE PLACING ORDERS FOR FUTURES CONTRACTS ON A REGISTERED ENTITY, RESULTING IN SIGNIFICANT BENEFIT TO THEMSELVES AND
HARM TO OTHER MARKET PARTICIPANTS. BY VIRTUE OF THIS CONDUCT, JPM ENGAGED IN MANIPULATION AND ATTEMPTED MANIPULATION IN
VIOLATION OF SECTION 9(A)(2) OF THE ACT, 7 U.S.C. § 13(A)(2) (2018); FOR CONDUCT OCCURRING ON OR AFTER JULY 16, 2011, ENGAGED IN
SPOOFING IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 4C(A)(5)(C) OF THE ACT, 7 U.S.C. § 6C(A)(5)(C) (2018); AND FOR CONDUCT OCCURRING ON OR AFTER AUGUST
15, 2011, ENGAGED IN MANIPULATION AND ATTEMPTED MANIPULATION IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 6(C)(1) AND 6(C)(3) OF THE ACT, 7 U.S.C. § 9(1),

,
,
( )( )
( )( )
,
§
( ),
(3) (2018), AND REGULATIONS 180.1(A)(1) AND (3) AND 180.2, 17 C.F.R. §§ 180.1(A)(1), (3), 180.2 (2019). FURTHER, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE
ABOVE-REFERENCED MISCONDUCT, THE BROKER-DEALER FAILED TO DILIGENTLY SUPERVISE IN VIOLATION OF COMMISSION REGULATION 166.3, 17
C.F.R. § 166.3 (2019). THE BANK AND THE BROKER­DEALER DO NOT CONTROL, NOR ARE THEY CONTROLLED BY, THE ADVISER.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Settled
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
09/29/2020
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 436,431,811.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
THE ORDER DIRECTS JPM TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM VIOLATING SECTIONS 4C(A)(5)(C), 6(C)(1), 6(C) (3), AND 9(A)(2) OF THE ACT, 7 U.S.C. §§
6C(A)(5)(C), 9(1), (3), 13(A)(2) (2018), AND REGULATIONS 180.1(A)(1) AND (3) AND 180.2, 17 C.F.R. §§ 180.1(A)(1), (3), 180.2 (2019).
ADDITIONALLY, THE ORDER REQUIRES THE BANK AND JPMC & CO. TO PAY RESTITUTION IN THE AMOUNT OF $205,992,102, AND THE BROKER-
DEALER AND JPMC & CO. TO PAY ADDITIONAL RESTITUTION IN THE AMOUNT OF $105,744,906. THE ORDER FURTHER REQUIRES JPM TO PAY A
CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $436,431,811. THE ORDER ALSO REQUIRES THE BANK AND JPMC & CO. TO PAY DISGORGEMENT IN
THE AMOUNT OF $120,332,430 AND THE BROKER-DEALER AND JPMC & CO. TO PAY DISGORGEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $51,702,360.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
RESPONDENTS JPM HAVE SUBMITTED AN OFFER OF SETTLEMENT, WHICH THE COMMISSION HAS DETERMINED TO ACCEPT. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED THAT JPM SHALL CEASE AND DESIST FROM VIOLATING SECTIONS 4C(A)(5)(C), 6(C)(1), 6(C)(3), AND 9(A)(2) OF THE ACT AND REGULATIONS
180.1(A)(1) AND (3) AND 180.2, AND THE BROKER-DEALER SHALL CEASE AND DESIST FROM VIOLATING REGULATION 166.3. THE BROKER-DEALER
SHALL PAY RESTITUTION OF ONE HUNDRED FIVE MILLION SEVEN HUNDRED FORTY-FOUR THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED SIX DOLLARS ($105,744,906),
JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY WITH JPMC & CO; A CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY OF FOUR HUNDRED THIRTY-SIX MILLION FOUR HUNDRED THIRTY-ONE
THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED ELEVEN DOLLARS ($436,431,811), JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY WITH THE BANK AND JPMC & CO; DISGORGEMENT IN THE
AMOUNT OF FIFTY ONE MILLION SEVEN HUNDRED TWO THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED SIXTY DOLLARS ($51,702,360), JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY WITH
JPMC & CO; ADDITIONALLY, THE BANK AND JPMC & CO SHALL PAY TWO HUNDRED FIVE MILLION NINE HUNDRED NINETY-TWO THOUSAND ONE
HUNDRED TWO DOLLARS ($205,992,102) IN RESITUTION AND ONE HUNDRED TWENTY MILLION THREE HUNDRED THIRTY-TWO THOUSAND FOUR
HUNDRED THIRTY DOLLARS ($120,332,430) IN DISGORGEMENT, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY; JPM SHALL COMPLY WITH THE UNDERTAKINGS SET FORTH IN
THE ORDER.
regulatory · block 7JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.PDF pages 1160–1162
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
Regulator name — filed text
FEDERAL FINANCIAL SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY (BAFIN)
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 1,830,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Order

Action status / disposition — filed text

AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE OF 1,830,000 EUROS IS IMPOSED PURSUANT TO SECTION 30 (1) NO. 1, (4) SENTENCE 1 OF THE GERMAN ACT ON BREACHES OF ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS, ON THE GROUNDS OF ANEGLIGENT BREACH OF SUPERVISORY AND ORGANIZATIONAL DUTIES IN CONNECTION WITH INFRINGEMENTS OF SECTION 21 OF THE GERMAN SECURITIES TRADING ACT RELATING TO THE FILING OF VOTING RIGHTS NOTIFICATIONS.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

NEGLIGENT BREACH OF SUPERVISORY AND ORGANIZATIONAL DUTIES IN CONNECTION WITH INFRINGEMENTSOF SECTION 21 OF THE GERMAN SECURITIES TRADING ACT.

Sanction detail — filed text

AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE OF 1,830,000 EUROS
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.

Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FEDERAL FINANCIAL SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY (BAFIN)
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
07/22/2021
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
WA 17-WP 3120-2020/0011
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 

7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
NEGLIGENT BREACH OF SUPERVISORY AND ORGANIZATIONAL DUTIES IN CONNECTION WITH INFRINGEMENTSOF SECTION 21 OF THE GERMAN
SECURITIES TRADING ACT.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Order
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
08/09/2021
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 1,830,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE OF 1,830,000 EUROS
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE OF 1,830,000 EUROS IS IMPOSED PURSUANT TO SECTION 30 (1) NO. 1, (4) SENTENCE 1 OF THE GERMAN ACT ON BREACHES
OF ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS, ON THE GROUNDS OF ANEGLIGENT BREACH OF SUPERVISORY AND ORGANIZATIONAL DUTIES IN CONNECTION
WITH INFRINGEMENTS OF SECTION 21 OF THE GERMAN SECURITIES TRADING ACT RELATING TO THE FILING OF VOTING RIGHTS NOTIFICATIONS.
regulatory · block 8PDF pages 1162–1164
Regulator name — filed text
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 1,000,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Order

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE ALLEGATIONS, DISPOSITIONS, FINDINGS AND SANCTIONS OF THE ORDER ARE DESCRIBED ABOVE IN ITEMS 7 AND 12.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

ON OCTOBER 31, 2024, J.P. MORGAN INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC. ("JPMIM") ENTERED INTO A SETTLEMENT WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ("SEC") RESULTING IN THE SEC ISSUING AN ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER (THE "ORDER"). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS IN THE ORDER, JPMIM CONSENTED TO THE ENTRY OF THE ORDER, WHICH FOUND THAT JPMIM CAUSED JP MORGAN SECURITIES LLC ("JPMS") TO VIOLATE SECTION 17(A)(1) OF THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 ("INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT") AND THAT JPMIM WILLFULLY VIOLATED SECTIONS 206(3) AND (4) OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940 ("ADVISERS ACT") AND RULE 206(4)-7 THEREUNDER. THE ORDER ALSO FOUND THAT JPMIM CAUSED CERTAIN REGISTERED INVESTMENT COMPANIES TO VIOLATE RULE 38A-1 OF THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT. THE ORDER FOUND THAT JPMIM, FROM JUNE 2019 UNTIL MARCH 2021, ENGAGED IN CERTAIN PROHIBITED PRINCIPAL TRADES FOR BOTH REGISTERED INVESTMENT COMPANY AND NON-REGISTERED INVESTMENT COMPANY CLIENTS. WITH RESPECT TO THE REGISTERED INVESTMENT COMPANY CLIENTS, THE ORDER FOUND THAT JPMIM FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THE CONDITIONS OF EXEMPTIVE RELIEF PREVIOUSLY GRANTED TO JPMIM BY THE SEC REGARDING TRADING WITH JPMS. WITH RESPECT TO THE NON-REGISTERED INVESTMENT COMPANY CLIENTS, THE ORDER FOUND THAT JPMIM FAILED TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED CLIENT DISCLOSURES OR OBTAIN CLIENT CONSENT FOR THE PRINCIPAL TRADES. THE ORDER ALSO FOUND THAT FROM JULY 2019 UNTIL MARCH 2024, JPMIM DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED POLICIES AND PROCEDURES TO PREVENT ITS PERSONNEL FROM CONDUCTING PROHIBITED PRINCIPAL TRADES.

Sanction detail — filed text

THE ORDER ACKNOWLEDGED THAT JPMIM NOTIFIED SEC ENFORCEMENT STAFF UPON LEARNING ABOUT THE TRADES AND PROMPTLY UNDERTOOK REMEDIAL ACTS. THE ORDER CENSURED JPMIM AND DIRECTED JPMIM TO CEASE-AND-DESIST FROM COMMITTING OR CAUSING ANY VIOLATIONS AND ANY FUTURE VIOLATIONS OF SECTION 17(A)(1) OF THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT AND RULE 38A-1 THEREUNDER, AND SECTIONS 206(3) AND 206(4) OF THE ADVISERS ACT AND RULE 206(4)-7 THEREUNDER. ADDITIONALLY, THE ORDER REQUIRES JPMIM TO PAY A CIVIL MONEY PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,000,000. JPMIM WILL PAY THE CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates

If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Cease and Desist
Other Sanctions: 
CENSURE, CIVIL PENALTY
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
10/31/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING FILE NO. 3-22282
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other
Other Product Types: 
COMMERCIAL PAPER
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
ON OCTOBER 31, 2024, J.P. MORGAN INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC. ("JPMIM") ENTERED INTO A SETTLEMENT WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION ("SEC") RESULTING IN THE SEC ISSUING AN ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER (THE "ORDER"). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS
IN THE ORDER, JPMIM CONSENTED TO THE ENTRY OF THE ORDER, WHICH FOUND THAT JPMIM CAUSED JP MORGAN SECURITIES LLC ("JPMS") TO
VIOLATE SECTION 17(A)(1) OF THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 ("INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT") AND THAT JPMIM WILLFULLY VIOLATED
SECTIONS 206(3) AND (4) OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940 ("ADVISERS ACT") AND RULE 206(4)-7 THEREUNDER. THE ORDER ALSO FOUND
THAT JPMIM CAUSED CERTAIN REGISTERED INVESTMENT COMPANIES TO VIOLATE RULE 38A-1 OF THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT. THE ORDER FOUND
THAT JPMIM, FROM JUNE 2019 UNTIL MARCH 2021, ENGAGED IN CERTAIN PROHIBITED PRINCIPAL TRADES FOR BOTH REGISTERED INVESTMENT
COMPANY AND NON-REGISTERED INVESTMENT COMPANY CLIENTS. WITH RESPECT TO THE REGISTERED INVESTMENT COMPANY CLIENTS, THE ORDER
FOUND THAT JPMIM FAILED TO COMPLY WITH THE CONDITIONS OF EXEMPTIVE RELIEF PREVIOUSLY GRANTED TO JPMIM BY THE SEC REGARDING
TRADING WITH JPMS. WITH RESPECT TO THE NON-REGISTERED INVESTMENT COMPANY CLIENTS, THE ORDER FOUND THAT JPMIM FAILED TO PROVIDE
THE REQUIRED CLIENT DISCLOSURES OR OBTAIN CLIENT CONSENT FOR THE PRINCIPAL TRADES. THE ORDER ALSO FOUND THAT FROM JULY 2019
UNTIL MARCH 2024, JPMIM DID NOT HAVE REASONABLY DESIGNED POLICIES AND PROCEDURES TO PREVENT ITS PERSONNEL FROM CONDUCTING
PROHIBITED PRINCIPAL TRADES.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final

9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Order
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
10/31/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 1,000,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
THE ORDER ACKNOWLEDGED THAT JPMIM NOTIFIED SEC ENFORCEMENT STAFF UPON LEARNING ABOUT THE TRADES AND PROMPTLY UNDERTOOK
REMEDIAL ACTS. THE ORDER CENSURED JPMIM AND DIRECTED JPMIM TO CEASE-AND-DESIST FROM COMMITTING OR CAUSING ANY VIOLATIONS
AND ANY FUTURE VIOLATIONS OF SECTION 17(A)(1) OF THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT AND RULE 38A-1 THEREUNDER, AND SECTIONS 206(3)
AND 206(4) OF THE ADVISERS ACT AND RULE 206(4)-7 THEREUNDER. ADDITIONALLY, THE ORDER REQUIRES JPMIM TO PAY A CIVIL MONEY
PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,000,000. JPMIM WILL PAY THE CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE ALLEGATIONS, DISPOSITIONS, FINDINGS AND SANCTIONS OF THE ORDER ARE DESCRIBED ABOVE IN ITEMS 7 AND 12.
regulatory · block 9PDF pages 1164–1166
Regulator name — filed text
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 5,000,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Order

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE ALLEGATIONS, DISPOSITIONS, FINDINGS AND SANCTIONS OF THE ORDER ARE DESCRIBED ABOVE IN ITEMS 7 AND 12.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

ON OCTOBER 31, 2024, J.P. MORGAN INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC. ("JPMIM") ENTERED INTO A SETTLEMENT WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ("SEC") RESULTING IN THE SEC ISSUING AN ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER (THE "ORDER"). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS IN THE ORDER, JPMIM CONSENTED TO THE ENTRY OF THE ORDER, WHICH FOUND THAT JPMIM CAUSED VIOLATIONS OF SECTION 17(D) OF THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 ("INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT") AND RULE 17D-1 THEREUNDER. THE ORDER AROSE OUT OF JPMIM CAUSING PROHIBITED JOINT TRANSACTIONS BETWEEN THREE U.S. MONEY MARKET MUTUAL FUNDS FOR WHICH JPMIM SERVES AS A REGISTERED INVESTMENT ADVISER ("DOMESTIC FUNDS") AND AN AFFILIATED FOREIGN MONEY MARKET FUND FOR WHICH JPMIM SERVES AS A DELEGATED PORTFOLIO MANAGER ("FOREIGN FUND") WITHOUT HAVING OBTAINED AN EXEMPTION FROM THE SEC. THE ORDER ALSO FOUND THAT THE PROHIBITED JOINT TRANSACTIONS ADVANTAGED THE FOREIGN FUND OVER THE DOMESTIC FUNDS.

Sanction detail — filed text

THE ORDER DIRECTED JPMIM TO CEASE-AND-DESIST FROM COMMITTING OR CAUSING ANY VIOLATIONS AND ANY FUTURE VIOLATIONS OF SECTION 17(D) OF THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 AND RULE 17D-1 PROMULGATED THEREUNDER. ADDITIONALLY, THE ORDER REQUIRES JPMIM TO PAY A CIVIL MONEY PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,000,000. JPMIM WILL PAY THE CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE ORDER.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.

ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Cease and Desist
Other Sanctions: 
CIVIL PENALTY
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
10/31/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING FILE NO. 3-22281
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other
Other Product Types: 
COMMERCIAL PAPER
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
ON OCTOBER 31, 2024, J.P. MORGAN INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC. ("JPMIM") ENTERED INTO A SETTLEMENT WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION ("SEC") RESULTING IN THE SEC ISSUING AN ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER (THE "ORDER"). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS
IN THE ORDER, JPMIM CONSENTED TO THE ENTRY OF THE ORDER, WHICH FOUND THAT JPMIM CAUSED VIOLATIONS OF SECTION 17(D) OF THE
INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 ("INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT") AND RULE 17D-1 THEREUNDER. THE ORDER AROSE OUT OF JPMIM CAUSING
PROHIBITED JOINT TRANSACTIONS BETWEEN THREE U.S. MONEY MARKET MUTUAL FUNDS FOR WHICH JPMIM SERVES AS A REGISTERED INVESTMENT
ADVISER ("DOMESTIC FUNDS") AND AN AFFILIATED FOREIGN MONEY MARKET FUND FOR WHICH JPMIM SERVES AS A DELEGATED PORTFOLIO MANAGER
("FOREIGN FUND") WITHOUT HAVING OBTAINED AN EXEMPTION FROM THE SEC. THE ORDER ALSO FOUND THAT THE PROHIBITED JOINT TRANSACTIONS
ADVANTAGED THE FOREIGN FUND OVER THE DOMESTIC FUNDS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Order

11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
10/31/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 5,000,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
THE ORDER DIRECTED JPMIM TO CEASE-AND-DESIST FROM COMMITTING OR CAUSING ANY VIOLATIONS AND ANY FUTURE VIOLATIONS OF
SECTION 17(D) OF THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 AND RULE 17D-1 PROMULGATED THEREUNDER. ADDITIONALLY, THE ORDER
REQUIRES JPMIM TO PAY A CIVIL MONEY PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,000,000. JPMIM WILL PAY THE CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE ORDER.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE ALLEGATIONS, DISPOSITIONS, FINDINGS AND SANCTIONS OF THE ORDER ARE DESCRIBED ABOVE IN ITEMS 7 AND 12.

* Metrics are based on the latest available data, including Form ADV filings, brochures, and relationship summaries pulled from the SEC IAPD, and may be subject to change. Learn what is included in the Rialytix data. Please refer to the firm's official disclosures for the most accurate information using their CRD number. This is not investment advice.