Silverpeak Real Estate Partners L.P.

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Item 11.H. of Part
1A or Item 2.F. of Part 1B of Form ADV.
Civil Judicial
Check Part 1A item(s) being responded to:
11.H(1)(a)
11.H(1)(b)
11.H(1)(c)
11.H(2)
Check Part 1B item(s) being responded to:
2.F(1)
2.F(2)
2.F(3)
2.F(4)
2.F(5)
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page.
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Item 11.H. of Part 1A or Item 2.F. of Part 1B. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. Unrelated civil judicial actions must be reported on separate DRPs.

PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
2039084
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
WALSH, MARK, ALBERT
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.H.
(1)(a), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Court Action initiated by: (Name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, SRO, commodities exchange, agency, firm, private plaintiff, etc.) 
PRIVATE PLAINTIFFS
2.
Principal Relief Sought:
Money Damages (Private/Civil Complaint)
Other Relief Sought: 
3.
Filing Date of Court Action (MM/DD/YYYY):
04/28/2021
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
VARIOUS
4.
Principal Product Type:
Other
Other Product Types: 
SPECIAL-PURPOSE ACQUISITION COMPANY
5.
Formal Action was brought in (include name of Federal, State or Foreign Court, Location of Court - City or County and State or Country, Docket/Case
Number): 
THAI V. BURNS, NO. 21-CV-1267 (N.D. OHIO)
6.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the civil judicial action (if applicable): 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this civil action (your response must fit within the space provided): 
SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE COMPLAINTS
8.
Current Status? 
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final

9.
If on appeal, action appealed to (provide name of court) and Date Appeal Filed (MM/DD/YYYY): 
10. If pending, date notice/process was served (MM/DD/YYYY):
04/28/2021
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
VARIOUS
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 14 only.
11. How was matter resolved:
Other
12. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
SEE RESPONSE TO QUESTION 14
13. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered or Relief Granted(check appropriate items)?
Monetary/Fine Amount: $
Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
Disgorgement/Restitution
Censure
Cease and Desist/Injunction
Bar
Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions:
C.
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement, or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived:
14. Provide a brief summary of circumstances related to the action(s), allegation(s), disposition(s) and/or finding(s) disclosed above (your response must
fit within the space provided). 
MARK A. WALSH, AS ONE OF FIVE FORMER DIRECTORS OF DIAMONDPEAK HOLDINGS CORP. ("DIAMONDPEAK"), WAS NAMED AS A DEFENDANT IN
PENDING STOCKHOLDER LAWSUITS RELATED TO THE OCTOBER 2020 MERGER BETWEEN DIAMONDPEAK AND LORDSTOWN MOTORS CORP.
("LORDSTOWN"). ON JUNE 27, 2023, LORDSTOWN AND TWO OF ITS SUBSIDIARIES COMMENCED CHAPTER 11 PROCEEDINGS IN THE UNITED STATES
BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. FOLLOWING APPROVAL OF LORDSTOWN'S PLAN OF CONFIRMATION ON MARCH 14, 2024, THE
COMPANY EMERGED FROM BANKRUPTCY AS NU RIDE INC. CERTAIN OF THE STOCKHOLDER LAWSUITS HAVE BEEN SETTLED AND THE COMPLAINTS HAVE
BEEN DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. ONE DERIVATIVE LAWSUIT REMAINS PENDING BUT IS STAYED BY AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES: THAI V. BURNS, NO.
21-CV-1267 (N.D. OHIO). PURSUANT TO A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH NU RIDE INC., THAT CASE WILL BE DISMISSED AS TO MR. WALSH ONCE THE
RESPECTIVE STAY IS LIFTED. FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBT, THE FIRM'S ADVISORY AFFILIATES DID NOT AND DO NOT CONSIDER THE ABOVE MATTERS
TO BE MATERIAL TO ADVISORY CLIENTS, BUT HAVE DISCLOSED AND CONTINUE TO DISCLOSE THE DETAILS BASED ON A CONSERVATIVE
INTERPRETATION OF THE FORM ADV INSTRUCTIONS. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, PLEASE REFER TO WWW.ADVISERINFO.SEC.GOV.