Cerberus Capital Management, L.P.

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Item 11.H. of Part
1A or Item 2.F. of Part 1B of Form ADV.
Civil Judicial
Check Part 1A item(s) being responded to:
11.H(1)(a)
11.H(1)(b)
11.H(1)(c)
11.H(2)
Check Part 1B item(s) being responded to:
2.F(1)
2.F(2)
2.F(3)
2.F(4)
2.F(5)
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page.
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Item 11.H. of Part 1A or Item 2.F. of Part 1B. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. Unrelated civil judicial actions must be reported on separate DRPs.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
3006744
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
BRADLEY, DOSTON
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.H.
(1)(a), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No

NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Court Action initiated by: (Name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, SRO, commodities exchange, agency, firm, private plaintiff, etc.) 
SKAT (CUSTOMS AND TAX ADMINISTRATION OF THE KINGDOM OF DENMARK)
2.
Principal Relief Sought:
Money Damages (Private/Civil Complaint)
Other Relief Sought: 
3.
Filing Date of Court Action (MM/DD/YYYY):
05/04/2018
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
SKAT FILED TWENTY CIVIL COMPLAINTS AGAINST VARIOUS PENSION PLANS AND 401K PLANS. EACH SUCH CIVIL COMPLAINT NAMED DOSTON BRADLEY
AS A DEFENDANT ALONG WITH THE NAMED PLAN. FIVE ACTIONS WERE FILED ON MAY 4, 2018, ONE ACTION WAS FILED ON MAY 18, 2018, SIX ACTIONS
WERE FILED ON MAY 22, 2018, TWO ACTIONS WERE FILED ON JUNE 6, 2018, AND SIX ACTIONS WERE FILED ON JUNE 8, 2018. THE CONDUCT ALLEGED
IN THESE COMPLAINTS OCCURRED PRIOR TO THE TIME THAT MR. BRADLEY BECAME EMPLOYED BY THE REGISTRANT.
4.
Principal Product Type:
Other
Other Product Types: 
APPLICATION TO SKAT CLAIMING REPAYMENTS OF TAX WITHHELD ON DIVIDENDS EARNED ON SHARES OF DANISH COMPANIES LISTED ON THE OMX
COPENHAGEN 20 INDEX, THE 20 MOST-TRADED STOCKS IN DENMARK.
5.
Formal Action was brought in (include name of Federal, State or Foreign Court, Location of Court - City or County and State or Country, Docket/Case
Number): 
U.S. DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (CASES 1:18-CV-04052-LAK; 1:18-CV-04050-LAK; 1:18-CV-04049-LAK; 1:18-CV-04047-LAK;
1:18-CV-04543-LAK; 1:18-CV-04541-LAK; 1:18-CV-04538-LAK; 1:18-CV-04522-LAK; 1:18-CV-04531-LAK; 1:18-CV-04536-LAK; 1:18-CV-05045-LAK;
1:18-CV-05057-LAK; 1:18-CV-04051-LAK; AND 1:18-CV-04430-LAK); AND U.S. DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, HOUSTON DIVISION
(CASES 4:18-CV-01889; 4:18-CV-01899; 4:18-CV-01895; 4:18-CV-01898; 4:18-CV-01897; AND 4:18-CV-01900)
6.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the civil judicial action (if applicable): 
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE FOLLOWING PLANS: LBR CAPITAL PENSION; HOUSTON ROCCO LLC 401K; DMR PENSION; BRADLEY LONDON
PENSION; TEXAS ROCCO LLC 401K; NYC STANISMORE PENSION; MONIN AMPER PENSION; BUSBY BLACK 401K; CANADA ROCK LLC 401K; ISDB
PENSION; DOSMON BLY PENSION; INDIA BOMBAY LLC 401K PENSION; PROPER PACIFIC LLC 401K; ATLANTIC DHR 401K; BLACKRAIN PEGASUS LLC
SOLO 401K; DELGADO FOX LLC SOLO 401K; GYOS 23 LLC SOLO 401K; JOANNE E. BRADLEY SOLO 401K; OAK TREE ONE 401K; AND PEGASUS FOX 23
LLC SOLO 401K
7.
Describe the allegations related to this civil action (your response must fit within the space provided): 
ALLEGED FRAUDULENT TAX REFUND SCHEME TO DECEIVE SKAT INTO PAYING APPROXIMATELY $2.1 BILLION (US) OF ALLEGEDLY WITHHELD DIVIDEND
TAX.
8.
Current Status? 
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, action appealed to (provide name of court) and Date Appeal Filed (MM/DD/YYYY): 
10. If pending, date notice/process was served (MM/DD/YYYY):
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 14 only.
11. How was matter resolved:
Settled
12. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 
07/07/2026
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
13. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered or Relief Granted(check appropriate items)?
Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 0.00
Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
Disgorgement/Restitution
Censure
Cease and Desist/Injunction
Bar
Suspension

B.
Other Sanctions:
C.
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement, or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived:
IN JULY 2026, PURSUANT TO A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN SKAT, DOSTON BRADLEY AND EACH OF THE PLANS INVOLVED, SKAT
VOLUNTARILY DISMISSED ITS CLAIMS AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS WITH PREJUDICE IN EXCHANGE FOR PAYMENT BY THE DEFENDANTS OF AN
AGREED-UPON SETTLEMENT AMOUNT.
14. Provide a brief summary of circumstances related to the action(s), allegation(s), disposition(s) and/or finding(s) disclosed above (your response must
fit within the space provided). 
DOSTON BRADLEY, JR., A MANAGING DIRECTOR IN INVESTOR RELATIONS AT CERBERUS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P. (THE "ADVISER"), WAS NAMED AS A
DEFENDANT IN TWENTY LAWSUITS FILED IN EITHER THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, OR THE UNITED STATES
DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, HOUSTON DIVISION, BY SKAT, THE CUSTOMS AND TAX ADMINISTRATION OF THE KINGDOM OF
DENMARK, AGAINST THE PLANS NAMED ABOVE, FOR WHICH MR. BRADLEY SERVED AS A REPRESENTATIVE. THE LAWSUITS ALLEGED, AMONG OTHER
THINGS, THAT THE PLANS IMPROPERLY OBTAINED DIVIDEND TAX WITHHOLDING AMOUNTS TO WHICH THEY WERE NOT ENTITLED FROM SKAT. THE
CONDUCT ALLEGED IN THESE MATTERS OCCURRED PRIOR TO THE TIME THAT MR. BRADLEY BECAME EMPLOYED BY THE ADVISER, AND IS WHOLLY AND
COMPLETELY UNRELATED TO THE BUSINESS AND/OR OTHER ACTIVITIES OF THE ADVISER. IN JULY 2026, PURSUANT TO A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN SKAT, DOSTON BRADLEY AND EACH OF THE PLANS INVOLVED, SKAT VOLUNTARILY DISMISSED ITS CLAIMS AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS WITH
PREJUDICE IN EXCHANGE FOR PAYMENT BY THE DEFENDANTS OF AN AGREED-UPON SETTLEMENT AMOUNT.