Assets under management Growth by Quarter
Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.
Private Funds
Private funds reported by On Investment Management Co.
Employee Growth by Quarter
Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.
Historical AUM and employee figures reflect available SEC Form ADV filings under this CRD. Filing gaps may reflect registration status changes, dormant periods, state registration periods, firm restructuring, or other reporting changes. Rialytix does not interpolate missing periods.
Ownership
Ownership information is not yet available for this profile.
Compliance & Disclosures
Filing dated 8/10/2026 9:45:08 AM
Responses were selected by the RIA in its filing. Questions are shortened for readability; “you” refers to the reporting firm, and some questions also cover advisory affiliates.
AFelonies2 No
In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:
- A1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a felony?No
- A2Been charged with a felony?No
BMisdemeanors2 No
In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:
- B1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a misdemeanor involving investments, an investment-related business, fraud, false statements or omissions, wrongful taking of property, bribery, perjury, forgery, counterfeiting, or extortion?No
- B2Been charged with a misdemeanor of the kind listed above?No
CSEC or CFTC actions1 Yes4 No
Has the SEC or CFTC ever:
- C1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
- C2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated SEC or CFTC regulations or statutes?No
- C3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- C4Entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
- C5Imposed a civil money penalty on you or an advisory affiliate, or ordered you or an advisory affiliate to cease and desist from any activity?Yes
DOther regulatory actions2 Yes3 No
Has any other federal regulatory agency, state regulatory agency, or foreign financial regulatory authority ever:
- D1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission, or was dishonest, unfair, or unethical?No
- D2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related regulations or statutes?Yes
- D3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- D4In the past ten years, entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?Yes
- D5Denied, suspended, or revoked your or an advisory affiliate’s registration or license, or otherwise prevented association with an investment-related business or restricted activities?No
ESelf-regulatory organization actions1 Yes3 No
Has a self-regulatory organization or commodities exchange ever:
- E1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
- E2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated its rules, other than a violation designated as a minor rule violation under an SEC-approved plan?Yes
- E3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- E4Disciplined you or an advisory affiliate by expulsion, suspension, barring association with other members, or otherwise restricting activities?No
FProfessional authorizations1 No
- FHas an authorization to act as an attorney, accountant, or federal contractor granted to you or an advisory affiliate ever been revoked or suspended?No
GPending regulatory proceedings1 No
- GAre you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a regulatory proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of C, D, or E?No
HCivil judicial actions and proceedings1 Yes3 No
(1) Court actions
Has a domestic or foreign court:
- H(1)(a)In the past ten years, enjoined you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
- H(1)(b)Found that you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related statutes or regulations?No
- H(1)(c)Dismissed, pursuant to a settlement agreement, an investment-related civil action brought against you or an advisory affiliate by a state or foreign financial regulatory authority?No
(2) Pending civil proceedings
- H(2)Are you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a civil proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of H(1)?Yes
Additional DRP filings 3 source blocks
Verbatim excerpts from supporting DRP filings, which may concern the firm or advisory affiliates. Amounts retain their filed labels; no total or attribution is inferred.
regulatory · block 1THE O.N. EQUITY SALES COMPANYPDF pages 37–39
- Advisory affiliate name — filed text
- THE O.N. EQUITY SALES COMPANY
- Regulator name — filed text
- VIRGINIA STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Settled
Action status / disposition — filed text
THE DIVISION ALLEGES THAT THE O.N. EQUITY SALES COMPANY FAILED TO ADEQUATELY MONITOR ABERNATHY'S USE OF HIS PERSONAL EMAIL ACCOUNT TO COMMUNICATE WITH CLIENTS DURING THE TIME HE WAS REGISTERED WITH THE FIRM. THE DIVISION ALSO ALLEGES THAT THE FIRM VIOLATED ITS OWN POLICIES AND PROCEDURES AS RELATED TO CONDUCTING BRANCH OFFICE AUDITS ON NEW BRANCH OFFICES. THE DIVISION ALLEGED THAT IF THE FIRM HAD COMPLIED WITH THESE REQUIREMENTS AND OBLIGATIONS, IT WOULD HAVE DISCOVERED ABERNATHY'S FRAUDULENT ACTIVITIES. AS A RESULT, ABERNATHY WAS ABLE TO SOLICIT AND MISAPPROPRIATE FUNDS FROM AT LEAST 14 INVESTORS WHILE HE WAS EMPLOYED BY FIRM. PRIOR TO THE ENTRY OF THE ORDER, THE O.N. EQUITY SALES COMPANY MADE PAYMENTS TOTALING $469,667 TO HARMED INVESTORS.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
THE DIVISION ALLEGES THAT THE O.N. EQUITY SALES COMPANY FAIL TO SUPERVISE FORMER REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVE, JOSHUA RAY ABERNATHY, WHILE HE WAS EMPLOYED BY THEIR FIRM. ABERNATHY MISAPPROPRIATED FUNDS FROM AT LEAST FOURTEEN (14) INVESTORS WHILE EMPLOYED BY THE O.N. EQUITY SALES COMPANY.
Sanction detail — filed text
THE DIVISION ORDERED THE O.N. EQUITY SALES COMPANY TO PAY $40,000 BACK TO HARMED INVESTORS ON A PRO RATA BASIS.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE CRD Number: 2936 This advisory affiliate is a Firm an Individual Registered: Yes No Name: THE O.N. EQUITY SALES COMPANY (For individuals, Last, First, Middle) This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) VIRGINIA STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION 2. Principal Sanction: Restitution Other Sanctions: 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 04/23/2019 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: SEC-2017-00023 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): THE O.N. EQUITY SALES COMPANY 6. Principal Product Type: Other Other Product Types: PROMISSORY NOTES, STOCK OPTIONS 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): THE DIVISION ALLEGES THAT THE O.N. EQUITY SALES COMPANY FAIL TO SUPERVISE FORMER REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVE, JOSHUA RAY ABERNATHY, WHILE HE WAS EMPLOYED BY THEIR FIRM. ABERNATHY MISAPPROPRIATED FUNDS FROM AT LEAST FOURTEEN (14) INVESTORS WHILE EMPLOYED BY THE O.N. EQUITY SALES COMPANY. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Settled 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 04/23/2019 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: THE DIVISION ORDERED THE O.N. EQUITY SALES COMPANY TO PAY $40,000 BACK TO HARMED INVESTORS ON A PRO RATA BASIS. 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). THE DIVISION ALLEGES THAT THE O.N. EQUITY SALES COMPANY FAILED TO ADEQUATELY MONITOR ABERNATHY'S USE OF HIS PERSONAL EMAIL ACCOUNT TO COMMUNICATE WITH CLIENTS DURING THE TIME HE WAS REGISTERED WITH THE FIRM. THE DIVISION ALSO ALLEGES THAT THE FIRM VIOLATED ITS OWN POLICIES AND PROCEDURES AS RELATED TO CONDUCTING BRANCH OFFICE AUDITS ON NEW BRANCH OFFICES. THE DIVISION ALLEGED THAT IF THE FIRM HAD COMPLIED WITH THESE REQUIREMENTS AND OBLIGATIONS, IT WOULD HAVE DISCOVERED ABERNATHY'S FRAUDULENT ACTIVITIES. AS A RESULT, ABERNATHY WAS ABLE TO SOLICIT AND MISAPPROPRIATE FUNDS FROM AT LEAST 14 INVESTORS WHILE HE WAS EMPLOYED BY FIRM. PRIOR TO THE ENTRY OF THE ORDER, THE O.N. EQUITY SALES COMPANY MADE PAYMENTS TOTALING $469,667 TO HARMED INVESTORS.
regulatory · block 2PDF pages 39–41
- Regulator name — filed text
- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 1,238,653.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Settled
Action status / disposition — filed text
THE ORDER, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CENSURED ONIMCO AND ORDERED ONIMCO TO CEASE-AND-DESIST FROM ANY FUTURE VIOLATIONS OF SECTIONS 206(2) AND 206(4) OF THE ADVISERS ACT AND RULE 206(4)-7 PROMULGATED THEREUNDER, AND TO PAY $866,257 IN DISGORGEMENT, $162,396 IN PREJUDGMENT INTEREST, AND A $210,000 CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY. ONIMCO CONSENTED TO ENTRY OF THE ORDER WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE SEC'S FINDINGS (EXCEPT AS TO JURISDICTION AND THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE ACTION, WHICH WAS ADMITTED) AND UNDERTOOK TO: REVIEW DISCLOSURES CONCERNING ITS SELECTION PROCESS FOR MUTUAL FUNDS, SHARE CLASSES, AND CASH SWEEPS; EVALUATE WHETHER TO MOVE CLIENTS TO DIFFERENT MUTUAL FUNDS, SHARE CLASSES, OR CASH SWEEPS; EVALUATE AND REVIEW FOR EFFECTIVENESS ONIMCO'S COMPLIANCE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES; NOTIFY AFFECTED INVESTORS OF THE TERMS OF THE ORDER; AND CERTIFY COMPLIANCE WITH ITS UNDERTAKINGS. PRIOR TO THE ENTRY OF THE ORDER, IN MARCH 2017, ONIMCO BEGAN REBATING 12B-1 FEES TO CLIENTS ON A GOINGFORWARD BASIS. PRIOR TO THE ENTRY OF THE ORDER, ONIMCO AND ITS AFFILIATES IMPLEMENTED REMEDIAL MEASURES INCLUDING CEASING RECEIVING REVENUE SHARING ON CLIENT ADVISORY ASSETS INVESTED IN MUTUAL FUNDS AND TRANSITIONING ITS CASH SWEEP OPTIONS FOR ITS CLIENTS TO MONEY MARKET FUNDS THAT DO NOT PAY REVENUE SHARING TO ONIMCO OR ONIMCO'S AFFILIATES, AS WELL AS REVISING DISCLOSURES AS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER. THE SEC'S ORDER CAN BE FOUND AT HTTPS://WWW.SEC.GOV/LITIGATION/ADMIN/2022/IA-5944.PDF.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
FOR THE PERIOD FROM 2014 THROUGH MARCH 2017, ONIMCO ADVISED CLIENTS TO PURCHASE OR HOLD MUTUAL FUND SHARE CLASSES THAT PAID 12B-1 FEES TO ONIMCO OR ITS AFFILIATED BROKER-DEALER INSTEAD OF LOWER-COST SHARE CLASSES FOR THE SAME FUNDS FOR WHICH THE CLIENTS WERE ELIGIBLE. THE SEC FURTHER STATED THAT, STARTING NO LATER THAN 2014, ONIMCO RECOMMENDED OR INVESTED FOR ADVISORY CLIENT'S MUTUAL FUNDS OR SHARE CLASSES OR CASH SWEEPS THAT PAID REVENUE SHARING PAYMENTS TO ONIMCO'S AFFILIATED BROKER-DEALER INSTEAD OF LOWER-COST FUNDS OR SHARE CLASSES FOR THE SAME MUTUAL FUNDS OR CASH SWEEPS FOR WHICH THE CLIENTS WERE ELIGIBLE. THE ORDER STATED THAT ONIMCO DID NOT ADEQUATELY DISCLOSE THESE CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AND THAT THE FAILURE TO DO SO CONSTITUTED BREACHES OF ONIMCO'S FIDUCIARY DUTY, DUTY TO SEEK BEST EXECUTION, OBLIGATION TO MAINTAIN AN EFFECTIVE COMPLIANCE PROGRAM, AND THAT THIS CONDUCT VIOLATED SECTIONS 206(2) AND 206(4) OF THE ADVISERS ACT AND RULE 206(4)-7 PROMULGATED THEREUNDER. THE SEC'S ORDER CAN BE FOUND AT HTTPS://WWW.SEC.GOV/LITIGATION/ADMIN/2022/IA-5944.PDF.
Sanction detail — filed text
THE ORDER, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CENSURED ONIMCO AND ORDERED ONIMCO TO CEASE-AND-DESIST FROM ANY FUTURE VIOLATIONS OF SECTIONS 206(2) AND 206(4) OF THE ADVISERS ACT AND RULE 206(4)-7 PROMULGATED THEREUNDER, AND TO PAY $866,257 IN DISGORGEMENT, $162,396 IN PREJUDGMENT INTEREST, AND A $210,000 CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY. PAYMENT IN PROCESS.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE No Information Filed This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 2. Principal Sanction: Cease and Desist Other Sanctions: CENSURED - AGREED TO PAY DISGORGEMENT, PREJUDGEMENT INTEREST, AND A CIVIL PENALTY. 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 01/11/2022 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: FILE NO. 3-20701 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: Mutual Fund(s) Other Product Types: MONEY MARKET FUND(S) 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): FOR THE PERIOD FROM 2014 THROUGH MARCH 2017, ONIMCO ADVISED CLIENTS TO PURCHASE OR HOLD MUTUAL FUND SHARE CLASSES THAT PAID 12B-1 FEES TO ONIMCO OR ITS AFFILIATED BROKER-DEALER INSTEAD OF LOWER-COST SHARE CLASSES FOR THE SAME FUNDS FOR WHICH THE CLIENTS WERE ELIGIBLE. THE SEC FURTHER STATED THAT, STARTING NO LATER THAN 2014, ONIMCO RECOMMENDED OR INVESTED FOR ADVISORY CLIENT'S MUTUAL FUNDS OR SHARE CLASSES OR CASH SWEEPS THAT PAID REVENUE SHARING PAYMENTS TO ONIMCO'S AFFILIATED BROKER-DEALER INSTEAD OF LOWER-COST FUNDS OR SHARE CLASSES FOR THE SAME MUTUAL FUNDS OR CASH SWEEPS FOR WHICH THE CLIENTS WERE ELIGIBLE. THE ORDER STATED THAT ONIMCO DID NOT ADEQUATELY DISCLOSE THESE CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AND THAT THE FAILURE TO DO SO CONSTITUTED BREACHES OF ONIMCO'S FIDUCIARY DUTY, DUTY TO SEEK BEST EXECUTION, OBLIGATION TO MAINTAIN AN EFFECTIVE COMPLIANCE PROGRAM, AND THAT THIS CONDUCT VIOLATED SECTIONS 206(2) AND 206(4) OF THE ADVISERS ACT AND RULE 206(4)-7 PROMULGATED THEREUNDER. THE SEC'S ORDER CAN BE FOUND AT HTTPS://WWW.SEC.GOV/LITIGATION/ADMIN/2022/IA-5944.PDF. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Settled 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 01/11/2022 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: ORDER WAS FINALIZED ON 1/11/2022. UNDERTAKINGS IN PROCESS. DISCLOSURE DOCUMENTS UPDATED CONCERNING MUTUAL FUND SHARE CLASS SELECTION AND 12B-1 FEES, NTF REVENUE SHARING, AND SWEEP ACCOUNT REVENUE SHARING. EVALUATE AND MOVE CUSTOMERS TO LOWER-COST AND NOT NTF REVENUE AS ORDERED. UPDATE FIRM POLICIES AND PROCEDURES. NOTIFY AFFECTED INVESTORS AND SEND COPY OF THE ORDER TO AFFECTED INVESTORS. 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 1,238,653.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: THE ORDER, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CENSURED ONIMCO AND ORDERED ONIMCO TO CEASE-AND-DESIST FROM ANY FUTURE VIOLATIONS OF SECTIONS 206(2) AND 206(4) OF THE ADVISERS ACT AND RULE 206(4)-7 PROMULGATED THEREUNDER, AND TO PAY $866,257 IN DISGORGEMENT, $162,396 IN PREJUDGMENT INTEREST, AND A $210,000 CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY. ONIMCO CONSENTED TO ENTRY OF THE ORDER WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE SEC'S FINDINGS (EXCEPT AS TO JURISDICTION AND THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE ACTION, WHICH WAS ADMITTED) AND UNDERTOOK TO: REVIEW DISCLOSURES CONCERNING ITS SELECTION PROCESS FOR MUTUAL FUNDS, SHARE CLASSES, AND CASH SWEEPS; EVALUATE WHETHER TO MOVE CLIENTS TO DIFFERENT MUTUAL FUNDS, SHARE CLASSES, OR CASH SWEEPS; EVALUATE AND REVIEW FOR EFFECTIVENESS ONIMCO'S COMPLIANCE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES; NOTIFY AFFECTED INVESTORS OF THE TERMS OF THE ORDER; AND CERTIFY COMPLIANCE WITH ITS UNDERTAKINGS. Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: THE ORDER, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CENSURED ONIMCO AND ORDERED ONIMCO TO CEASE-AND-DESIST FROM ANY FUTURE VIOLATIONS OF SECTIONS 206(2) AND 206(4) OF THE ADVISERS ACT AND RULE 206(4)-7 PROMULGATED THEREUNDER, AND TO PAY $866,257 IN DISGORGEMENT, $162,396 IN PREJUDGMENT INTEREST, AND A $210,000 CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY. PAYMENT IN PROCESS. 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). THE ORDER, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CENSURED ONIMCO AND ORDERED ONIMCO TO CEASE-AND-DESIST FROM ANY FUTURE VIOLATIONS OF SECTIONS 206(2) AND 206(4) OF THE ADVISERS ACT AND RULE 206(4)-7 PROMULGATED THEREUNDER, AND TO PAY $866,257 IN DISGORGEMENT, $162,396 IN PREJUDGMENT INTEREST, AND A $210,000 CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY. ONIMCO CONSENTED TO ENTRY OF THE ORDER WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE SEC'S FINDINGS (EXCEPT AS TO JURISDICTION AND THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE ACTION, WHICH WAS ADMITTED) AND UNDERTOOK TO: REVIEW DISCLOSURES CONCERNING ITS SELECTION PROCESS FOR MUTUAL FUNDS, SHARE CLASSES, AND CASH SWEEPS; EVALUATE WHETHER TO MOVE CLIENTS TO DIFFERENT MUTUAL FUNDS, SHARE CLASSES, OR CASH SWEEPS; EVALUATE AND REVIEW FOR EFFECTIVENESS ONIMCO'S COMPLIANCE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES; NOTIFY AFFECTED INVESTORS OF THE TERMS OF THE ORDER; AND CERTIFY COMPLIANCE WITH ITS UNDERTAKINGS. PRIOR TO THE ENTRY OF THE ORDER, IN MARCH 2017, ONIMCO BEGAN REBATING 12B-1 FEES TO CLIENTS ON A GOINGFORWARD BASIS. PRIOR TO THE ENTRY OF THE ORDER, ONIMCO AND ITS AFFILIATES IMPLEMENTED REMEDIAL MEASURES INCLUDING CEASING RECEIVING REVENUE SHARING ON CLIENT ADVISORY ASSETS INVESTED IN MUTUAL FUNDS AND TRANSITIONING ITS CASH SWEEP OPTIONS FOR ITS CLIENTS TO MONEY MARKET FUNDS THAT DO NOT PAY REVENUE SHARING TO ONIMCO OR ONIMCO'S AFFILIATES, AS WELL AS REVISING DISCLOSURES AS DESCRIBED IN THE ORDER. THE SEC'S ORDER CAN BE FOUND AT HTTPS://WWW.SEC.GOV/LITIGATION/ADMIN/2022/IA-5944.PDF.
civil judicial · block 1PDF pages 41–43
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Item 11.H. of Part 1A or Item 2.F. of Part 1B of Form ADV. Civil Judicial Check Part 1A item(s) being responded to: 11.H(1)(a) 11.H(1)(b) 11.H(1)(c) 11.H(2) Check Part 1B item(s) being responded to: 2.F(1) 2.F(2) 2.F(3) 2.F(4) 2.F(5) Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Item 11.H. of Part 1A or Item 2.F. of Part 1B. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. Unrelated civil judicial actions must be reported on separate DRPs. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE No Information Filed This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.H. (1)(a), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Court Action initiated by: (Name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, SRO, commodities exchange, agency, firm, private plaintiff, etc.) JAMES SHELTON 2. Principal Relief Sought: Money Damages (Private/Civil Complaint) Other Relief Sought: 3. Filing Date of Court Action (MM/DD/YYYY): 10/15/2025 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Principal Product Type: No Product Other Product Types: 5. Formal Action was brought in (include name of Federal, State or Foreign Court, Location of Court - City or County and State or Country, Docket/Case Number): DISTRICT COURT OF DALLAS COUNTY, TX 6. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the civil judicial action (if applicable): 7. Describe the allegations related to this civil action (your response must fit within the space provided): CUSTOMER ALLEGES MISAPPROPRIATION OF FUNDS BY A IAR OF THE FIRM; FIRM IS NAME AS A RESPONDENT. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, action appealed to (provide name of court) and Date Appeal Filed (MM/DD/YYYY): 10. If pending, date notice/process was served (MM/DD/YYYY): 10/19/2025 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 14 only. 11. How was matter resolved: 12. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 13. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered or Relief Granted(check appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions: C. Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement, or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: 14. Provide a brief summary of circumstances related to the action(s), allegation(s), disposition(s) and/or finding(s) disclosed above (your response must fit within the space provided). CUSTOMER ALLEGES IAR MISAPPROPRIATED FUNDS, INCLUDING PROCEEDS FROM AN INVESTMENT ADVISORY ACCOUNT(S) HELD BY O.N. INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY WHILE REGISTERED WITH THE FIRM.
* Metrics are based on the latest available data, including Form ADV filings, brochures, and relationship summaries pulled from the SEC IAPD, and may be subject to change. Learn what is included in the Rialytix data. Please refer to the firm's official disclosures for the most accurate information using their CRD number. This is not investment advice.