Assets Under Management
Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.
Employee Growth by Quarter
Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.
Historical AUM and employee figures reflect available SEC Form ADV filings under this CRD. Filing gaps may reflect registration status changes, dormant periods, state registration periods, firm restructuring, or other reporting changes. Rialytix does not interpolate missing periods.
Private Funds
Private funds reported by Rjj Pasadena Securities, Inc..
Custodians
Reported custodian relationships by Rjj Pasadena Securities, Inc..
- CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC.
$114,402,269
These custodians are disclosed for separately managed accounts under Form ADV’s 10% reporting threshold. This is not a complete list of custodians for all client assets.
Ownership
Reported direct and indirect relationships by Rjj Pasadena Securities, Inc..
Reported ownership ranges
Highlighted bands show the percentage range reported in Form ADV.
Bars represent the reported range at that individual ownership step, not an estimated percentage of the advisory firm. Indirect relationships may refer to intermediate entities rather than directly to Rjj Pasadena Securities, Inc...
No indirect ownership information reported in the source’s Schedule B.
Reported ownership and control details
2 entries
Reported ownership and control details
Compliance & Disclosures
Responses were selected by the RIA in its filing. Questions are shortened for readability; “you” refers to the reporting firm, and some questions also cover advisory affiliates.
AFelonies2 No
In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:
- A1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a felony?No
- A2Been charged with a felony?No
BMisdemeanors2 No
In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:
- B1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a misdemeanor involving investments, an investment-related business, fraud, false statements or omissions, wrongful taking of property, bribery, perjury, forgery, counterfeiting, or extortion?No
- B2Been charged with a misdemeanor of the kind listed above?No
CSEC or CFTC actions5 No
Has the SEC or CFTC ever:
- C1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
- C2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated SEC or CFTC regulations or statutes?No
- C3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- C4Entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
- C5Imposed a civil money penalty on you or an advisory affiliate, or ordered you or an advisory affiliate to cease and desist from any activity?No
DOther regulatory actions2 Yes3 No
Has any other federal regulatory agency, state regulatory agency, or foreign financial regulatory authority ever:
- D1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission, or was dishonest, unfair, or unethical?No
- D2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related regulations or statutes?Yes
- D3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- D4In the past ten years, entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?Yes
- D5Denied, suspended, or revoked your or an advisory affiliate’s registration or license, or otherwise prevented association with an investment-related business or restricted activities?No
ESelf-regulatory organization actions1 Yes3 No
Has a self-regulatory organization or commodities exchange ever:
- E1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
- E2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated its rules, other than a violation designated as a minor rule violation under an SEC-approved plan?Yes
- E3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- E4Disciplined you or an advisory affiliate by expulsion, suspension, barring association with other members, or otherwise restricting activities?No
FProfessional authorizations1 No
- FHas an authorization to act as an attorney, accountant, or federal contractor granted to you or an advisory affiliate ever been revoked or suspended?No
GPending regulatory proceedings1 No
- GAre you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a regulatory proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of C, D, or E?No
HCivil judicial actions and proceedings4 No
(1) Court actions
Has a domestic or foreign court:
- H(1)(a)In the past ten years, enjoined you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
- H(1)(b)Found that you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related statutes or regulations?No
- H(1)(c)Dismissed, pursuant to a settlement agreement, an investment-related civil action brought against you or an advisory affiliate by a state or foreign financial regulatory authority?No
(2) Pending civil proceedings
- H(2)Are you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a civil proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of H(1)?No
Additional DRP filings 6 source blocks
Verbatim excerpts from supporting DRP filings, which may concern the firm or advisory affiliates. Amounts retain their filed labels; no total or attribution is inferred.
regulatory · block 1PDF pages 20–21
- Regulator name — filed text
- ILLINOIS
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 1,500.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Order
Action status / disposition — filed text
OUR FIRM WAS NEVER DENIED REGISTRATION IN IL. IT WAS SIMPLY PENDING.AS OF 5/15/08, WE WERE APPROVED IN ILLINOIS. WE SIMPLY DID NOT REALIZE THAT WE HAD TO REGISTER. WE THOUGHT WE FELL UNDER A DE MINIMUS EXEMPTION SINCE WE ONLY HAVE 3 CLIENTS IN THE STATE.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
RESPONDENTS PENDING APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION AS A DEALER IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS IS SUBJECT TO DENIAL PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 12.A., 12.C. AND 8.E(1)(G) OF THE ILLINOIS SECURITIES LAW.
Sanction detail — filed text
CONSENT ORDER OF FINE FINE PAID
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE No Information Filed This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) ILLINOIS 2. Principal Sanction: Other Other Sanctions: N/A 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 04/15/2008 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: 0700564 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: No Product Other Product Types: 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): RESPONDENTS PENDING APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION AS A DEALER IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS IS SUBJECT TO DENIAL PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 12.A., 12.C. AND 8.E(1)(G) OF THE ILLINOIS SECURITIES LAW. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Order 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 05/13/2008 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 1,500.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: CONSENT ORDER OF FINE FINE PAID 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). OUR FIRM WAS NEVER DENIED REGISTRATION IN IL. IT WAS SIMPLY PENDING.AS OF 5/15/08, WE WERE APPROVED IN ILLINOIS. WE SIMPLY DID NOT REALIZE THAT WE HAD TO REGISTER. WE THOUGHT WE FELL UNDER A DE MINIMUS EXEMPTION SINCE WE ONLY HAVE 3 CLIENTS IN THE STATE.
regulatory · block 2PDF pages 21–23
- Regulator name — filed text
- VIRGINIA-DIVISION OF SECURITIES
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 3,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Settled
Action status / disposition — filed text
WE HAD A CLIENT WHO MOVED FROM CA TO VA AND WE WERE UNDER THE ASSUMPTION THAT ALL STATES HAD A DI MINIMUS EXEMPTION SINCE WE HAD JUST ONE CLIENT IN VA. WE FOUND THIS NOT TO BE THE CASE. NOT REGISTERING WAS TOTALLY INADVERTANT. IN FACT OVER 28 YEARS WE HAD 34 AUDITIORS FROM THE SEC TO FINRA TO THE STATE OF CA AND NONE OF THEM KNEW WE HAD TO BE REGISTERED IN VA OR ANY OTHER STATE FOR THAT MATTER. VA DOES NOT HAVE A DI MINIMUS EXEMPTION.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
THE DIVISION OF SECURITIES AND RETAIL FRANCHISING ALLEGED THAT THE DEFENDANT VIOLATED THE FOLLOWING PROVISION OF THE VIRGINIA SECURITIES ACT AND OF THE COMMISSIONS RULES AND REGULATIONS: (1) SECTION 13.1-504 A (I) OF THE VIRGINIA SECURITIES ACT BY EXECUTING SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS FOR VIRGINIA RESIDENTS WITHOUT BEING REGISTERED, (2) SECTION13.1-504 B OF THE VIRGINIA SECURITIES ACT BY EMPLOYING OTHER PERSONS WHO EXECUTED SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS FOR VIRGINIA RESIDENTS WITHOUT BEING REGISTERED AND (3) RULE 21 VAC 5-20-260 B OF THE COMMISSIONS RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR THE DEFENDENT'S FAILURE TO DILIGENTLY SUPERVISE THE SECURITIES ACTIVITIES OF ITS AGENTS.
Sanction detail — filed text
DEFENDENT WAS FINED $3,000.00 AND TO PAY THE COST OF THE INVESTIGATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $375.00
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE No Information Filed This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) VIRGINIA-DIVISION OF SECURITIES 2. Principal Sanction: Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s) Other Sanctions: COST OF INVESTIGATION AND INCORPORATE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 08/18/2008 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: SEC-2008-00040 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: No Product Other Product Types: 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): THE DIVISION OF SECURITIES AND RETAIL FRANCHISING ALLEGED THAT THE DEFENDANT VIOLATED THE FOLLOWING PROVISION OF THE VIRGINIA SECURITIES ACT AND OF THE COMMISSIONS RULES AND REGULATIONS: (1) SECTION 13.1-504 A (I) OF THE VIRGINIA SECURITIES ACT BY EXECUTING SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS FOR VIRGINIA RESIDENTS WITHOUT BEING REGISTERED, (2) SECTION13.1-504 B OF THE VIRGINIA SECURITIES ACT BY EMPLOYING OTHER PERSONS WHO EXECUTED SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS FOR VIRGINIA RESIDENTS WITHOUT BEING REGISTERED AND (3) RULE 21 VAC 5-20-260 B OF THE COMMISSIONS RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR THE DEFENDENT'S FAILURE TO DILIGENTLY SUPERVISE THE SECURITIES ACTIVITIES OF ITS AGENTS. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Settled 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 08/18/2008 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 3,000.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: DEFENDENT AGREED TO PAY THE COST OF THE INVESTIGATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $375.00 Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: DEFENDENT WAS FINED $3,000.00 AND TO PAY THE COST OF THE INVESTIGATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $375.00 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). WE HAD A CLIENT WHO MOVED FROM CA TO VA AND WE WERE UNDER THE ASSUMPTION THAT ALL STATES HAD A DI MINIMUS EXEMPTION SINCE WE HAD JUST ONE CLIENT IN VA. WE FOUND THIS NOT TO BE THE CASE. NOT REGISTERING WAS TOTALLY INADVERTANT. IN FACT OVER 28 YEARS WE HAD 34 AUDITIORS FROM THE SEC TO FINRA TO THE STATE OF CA AND NONE OF THEM KNEW WE HAD TO BE REGISTERED IN VA OR ANY OTHER STATE FOR THAT MATTER. VA DOES NOT HAVE A DI MINIMUS EXEMPTION.
regulatory · block 3PDF pages 23–25
- Regulator name — filed text
- FLORIDA OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 1,500.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Order
Action status / disposition — filed text
ON 10/29/2009, A FINAL ORDER ADOPTING THE STIPULATION AND CONSENT AGREEMENT IN THE MATTER OF RJJ PASADENA SECURITIES, INC.(RJJPS) WHO NEITHER ADMITTED OR DENIED THE FINDINGS BUT CONSENTED. RJJPS AGREED TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM ALL PRESENT AND FUTURE VIOLATIONS OF CHAPTER 517, F.S. AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RULES AND PAY ADMINISTRATIVE FINE OF $1,500. OFFICE AGREED TO ALLOW RJJPS TO WITHDRAW ITS BROKER DEALER APPLICATION. RJJPS THOUGHT FLORIDA HAD A DE MINIMUS EXEMPTION WHEN ONE CLIENT IS IN THEIR STATE. AFTERWARDS, WE FOUND THAT THEY DID NOT. THEREFORE, THIS ORDER WAS THE RESULT.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
CONDUCTED SECURITIES BUSINESS IN THIS STATE WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF LAWFUL REGISTRATION
Sanction detail — filed text
$1500.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FINE-PAID IN FULL ON 10/29/2010
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE No Information Filed This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) FLORIDA OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION 2. Principal Sanction: Cease and Desist Other Sanctions: CIVIL AND ADMINSTRATIVE FINES 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 10/29/2009 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: 0432-S-6/09 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: No Product Other Product Types: 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): CONDUCTED SECURITIES BUSINESS IN THIS STATE WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF LAWFUL REGISTRATION 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Order 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 10/29/2010 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 1,500.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: $1500.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FINE-PAID IN FULL ON 10/29/2010 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). ON 10/29/2009, A FINAL ORDER ADOPTING THE STIPULATION AND CONSENT AGREEMENT IN THE MATTER OF RJJ PASADENA SECURITIES, INC.(RJJPS) WHO NEITHER ADMITTED OR DENIED THE FINDINGS BUT CONSENTED. RJJPS AGREED TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM ALL PRESENT AND FUTURE VIOLATIONS OF CHAPTER 517, F.S. AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE RULES AND PAY ADMINISTRATIVE FINE OF $1,500. OFFICE AGREED TO ALLOW RJJPS TO WITHDRAW ITS BROKER DEALER APPLICATION. RJJPS THOUGHT FLORIDA HAD A DE MINIMUS EXEMPTION WHEN ONE CLIENT IS IN THEIR STATE. AFTERWARDS, WE FOUND THAT THEY DID NOT. THEREFORE, THIS ORDER WAS THE RESULT.
regulatory · block 4PDF pages 25–27
- Regulator name — filed text
- WASHINGTON
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 3,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Consent
Action status / disposition — filed text
EVENT WAS RELATED TO THE FIRM'S PRIOR REGISTRATION AS A BROKER-DEALER.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
MICHAEL JAMES GILHOOLY; RJJ PASADENA SECURITIES, INC. S-07-466-08-CO01-CONSENT ORDER ON OCTOBER 15, 2008, THE SECURITIES DIVISION ENTERED INTO A CONSENT ORDER, S-07-466-08-CO01, WITH MICHAEL JAMES GILHOOLY AND RJJ PASADENA SECURITIES, INC. (COLLECTIVELY "RESPONDENTS"). THE SECURITIES DIVISION HAD PREVIOUSLY ENTERED A STATEMENT OF CHARGES, S-07-466-07-SC01,AGAINST THE RESPONDENTS ON FEBRUARY 6, 2008. THE STATEMENT OF CHARGES ALLEGES THAT RESPONDENTS EFFECTED OVER AN EXTENDED PERIOD OF TIME THE PURCHASE AND SALE OF SECURITIES IN A CUSTOMER'S ACCOUNT AFTER THE CUSTOMER MOVED TO WASHINGTON, WITHOUT BEING PROPERLY REGISTERED.RESPONDENTS NEITHER ADMITTED NOR DENIED THE ALLEGATIONS, BUT AGREED TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM VIOLATING THE REGISTRATION PROVISIONS OF THE SECURITIES ACT. RESPONDENTS AGREED TO PAY A TOTAL FINE OF $6,000. RESPONDENTS EACH WAIVED THEIR RIGHT TO A HEARING AND TO JUDICIAL REVIEW OF THIS MATTER.
Sanction detail — filed text
IT IS AGREED AND ORDERED THAT MICHAEL JAMES GILHOOLY AND RJJ PASADENA SECURITIES, INC. SHALL EACH CEASE AND DESIST FROM ACTING AS AN UNREGISTERED SECURITIES BROKER-DEALER OR SALESPERSON IN VIOLATION OF RCW 21.20.040, THE BROKER-DEALER ANS SECURIES SALESPERSONREGISTRATION SECTION OF THE SECURITIES SECTION OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF WASHINGTON. IT IS FURTHER AGREED THAT PURSUANT TO RCW 21.20.395, MICHAEL JAMES GILHOOLY AND RJJ PASADENA SECURITIES, INC. SHALL EACH BE LIABLE FOR AND SHALL EACH PAY A FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,000. IT IS FURTHER AGREED THAT MICHAEL JAMES GILHOOLY AND RJJ PASADENA SECURITIES, INC. ENTER INTO THIS CONSENT ORDER FREELY AND VOLUNTARILY AND WITH FULL UNDERSTANDING OF ITS TERMS AND SIGNIFICANCE. IT IS FURTHER AGREED THAT THE SECURITIES DIVISION HAS JURISDICTION TO ENTER THIS ORDER. IT IS FURTHER AGREED THAT IN CONSIDERATION OF THE FOREGOING, MICHAEL JAMES GILHOOLY AND RJJ PASADENA SECURITIES, INC. WAIVE THEIR RIGHTS TO A HEARING IN THIS MATTER AND JUDICIAL REVIEW OF THIS ORDER.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE No Information Filed This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) WASHINGTON 2. Principal Sanction: Cease and Desist Other Sanctions: IMPOSE FINES AND REOVER COSTS 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 10/15/2008 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: S-07-466-07-SC01 ISSUED ON 2/06/2008 4. Docket/Case Number: S-07-466-08-CO01 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: No Product Other Product Types: 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): MICHAEL JAMES GILHOOLY; RJJ PASADENA SECURITIES, INC. S-07-466-08-CO01-CONSENT ORDER ON OCTOBER 15, 2008, THE SECURITIES DIVISION ENTERED INTO A CONSENT ORDER, S-07-466-08-CO01, WITH MICHAEL JAMES GILHOOLY AND RJJ PASADENA SECURITIES, INC. (COLLECTIVELY "RESPONDENTS"). THE SECURITIES DIVISION HAD PREVIOUSLY ENTERED A STATEMENT OF CHARGES, S-07-466-07-SC01,AGAINST THE RESPONDENTS ON FEBRUARY 6, 2008. THE STATEMENT OF CHARGES ALLEGES THAT RESPONDENTS EFFECTED OVER AN EXTENDED PERIOD OF TIME THE PURCHASE AND SALE OF SECURITIES IN A CUSTOMER'S ACCOUNT AFTER THE CUSTOMER MOVED TO WASHINGTON, WITHOUT BEING PROPERLY REGISTERED.RESPONDENTS NEITHER ADMITTED NOR DENIED THE ALLEGATIONS, BUT AGREED TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM VIOLATING THE REGISTRATION PROVISIONS OF THE SECURITIES ACT. RESPONDENTS AGREED TO PAY A TOTAL FINE OF $6,000. RESPONDENTS EACH WAIVED THEIR RIGHT TO A HEARING AND TO JUDICIAL REVIEW OF THIS MATTER. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Consent 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 10/15/2008 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 3,000.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: IT IS AGREED AND ORDERED THAT MICHAEL JAMES GILHOOLY AND RJJ PASADENA SECURITIES, INC. SHALL EACH CEASE AND DESIST FROM ACTING AS AN UNREGISTERED SECURITIES BROKER-DEALER OR SALESPERSON IN VIOLATION OF RCW 21.20.040, THE BROKER-DEALER ANS SECURIES SALESPERSONREGISTRATION SECTION OF THE SECURITIES SECTION OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF WASHINGTON. IT IS FURTHER AGREED THAT PURSUANT TO RCW 21.20.395, MICHAEL JAMES GILHOOLY AND RJJ PASADENA SECURITIES, INC. SHALL EACH BE LIABLE FOR AND SHALL EACH PAY A FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,000. IT IS FURTHER AGREED THAT MICHAEL JAMES GILHOOLY AND RJJ PASADENA SECURITIES, INC. ENTER INTO THIS CONSENT ORDER FREELY AND VOLUNTARILY AND WITH FULL UNDERSTANDING OF ITS TERMS AND SIGNIFICANCE. IT IS FURTHER AGREED THAT THE SECURITIES DIVISION HAS JURISDICTION TO ENTER THIS ORDER. IT IS FURTHER AGREED THAT IN CONSIDERATION OF THE FOREGOING, MICHAEL JAMES GILHOOLY AND RJJ PASADENA SECURITIES, INC. WAIVE THEIR RIGHTS TO A HEARING IN THIS MATTER AND JUDICIAL REVIEW OF THIS ORDER. 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). EVENT WAS RELATED TO THE FIRM'S PRIOR REGISTRATION AS A BROKER-DEALER.
regulatory · block 5RJJ PASADENA SECURITIES, INC.PDF pages 27–29
- Advisory affiliate name — filed text
- RJJ PASADENA SECURITIES, INC.
- Regulator name — filed text
- FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY (FINRA)
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 5,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Action status / disposition — filed text
ON OCTOBER 17, 2017 ONE OF THE FIRM'S REGISTERED OPTIONS PRINCIPALS RESIGNED FROM THE FIRM. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE FIRM DESIGNATED ONE OF ITS GENERAL SECURITIES PRINCIPALS TO SUPERVISE OPTIONS TRADING OF THE FIRM'S OTHER REGISTERED OPTIONS PRINCIPALS PRIOR TO THE GENERAL SECURITIES PRINCIPAL BECOMING FULLY REGISTERED AS AN OPTIONS PRINCIPAL.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
THE FIRM WAS FOUND TO HAVE VIOLATED FINRA RULE 3110, 2360, AND 2010, IN THAT IT CONDUCTED OPTIONS TRADING AFTER ONE OF TWO REQUIRED OPTIONS PRINCIPALS LEFT THE FIRM, AND BEFORE A NEW, SECOND OPTIONS PRINCIPAL WAS PUT IN PLACE. ALL TRADES WERE MONITORED BY THE FIRM'S GENERAL SECURITIES PRINCIPAL.
Sanction detail — filed text
$5000 FINE, PAID OCTOBER 7, 2020
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE CRD Number: 8425 This advisory affiliate is a Firm an Individual Registered: Yes No Name: RJJ PASADENA SECURITIES, INC. (For individuals, Last, First, Middle) This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY (FINRA) 2. Principal Sanction: Censure Other Sanctions: - FINE OF $5000 - REVISE THE FIRM'S WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES WITHIN 90 DAYS OF AWC. 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 10/07/2020 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: 2017053556902 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): RJJ PASADENA SECURITIES, INC. 6. Principal Product Type: Options Other Product Types: 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): THE FIRM WAS FOUND TO HAVE VIOLATED FINRA RULE 3110, 2360, AND 2010, IN THAT IT CONDUCTED OPTIONS TRADING AFTER ONE OF TWO REQUIRED OPTIONS PRINCIPALS LEFT THE FIRM, AND BEFORE A NEW, SECOND OPTIONS PRINCIPAL WAS PUT IN PLACE. ALL TRADES WERE MONITORED BY THE FIRM'S GENERAL SECURITIES PRINCIPAL. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC) 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 10/07/2020 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 5,000.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: REVISION OF WRITTEN SUPERVISORY PROCEDURES WITHIN 90 DAYS OF ACCEPTANCE. Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: $5000 FINE, PAID OCTOBER 7, 2020 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). ON OCTOBER 17, 2017 ONE OF THE FIRM'S REGISTERED OPTIONS PRINCIPALS RESIGNED FROM THE FIRM. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE FIRM DESIGNATED ONE OF ITS GENERAL SECURITIES PRINCIPALS TO SUPERVISE OPTIONS TRADING OF THE FIRM'S OTHER REGISTERED OPTIONS PRINCIPALS PRIOR TO THE GENERAL SECURITIES PRINCIPAL BECOMING FULLY REGISTERED AS AN OPTIONS PRINCIPAL.
regulatory · block 6PDF pages 29–30
- Regulator name — filed text
- NEVADA SECURITIES COMMISSION
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 21,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Consent
Action status / disposition — filed text
ALL MATTERS IN THE ORDER HAVE BEEN CORRECTED.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
THE NEVADA SECURITIES DIVISION STATED THAT THE FIRM DID NOT OBTAIN ANNUAL CERTIFICATION OF CLIENT FUNDS AND SECURITIES AND DID NOT PROPERLY DISCLOSE FEES CHARGED TO CLIENTS. THE FIRM SETTLED THE MATTER FOR $21,000.
Sanction detail — filed text
CIVIL PENALTIES AND FINE OF $21,000. PAID 4/18/25.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE No Information Filed This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) NEVADA SECURITIES COMMISSION 2. Principal Sanction: Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s) Other Sanctions: 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 04/18/2025 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: CIC23-111 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: No Product Other Product Types: 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): THE NEVADA SECURITIES DIVISION STATED THAT THE FIRM DID NOT OBTAIN ANNUAL CERTIFICATION OF CLIENT FUNDS AND SECURITIES AND DID NOT PROPERLY DISCLOSE FEES CHARGED TO CLIENTS. THE FIRM SETTLED THE MATTER FOR $21,000. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Consent 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 04/18/2025 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 21,000.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: CIVIL PENALTIES AND FINE OF $21,000. PAID 4/18/25. 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). ALL MATTERS IN THE ORDER HAVE BEEN CORRECTED.
* Metrics are based on the latest available data, including Form ADV filings, brochures, and relationship summaries pulled from the SEC IAPD, and may be subject to change. Learn what is included in the Rialytix database. Please refer to the firm's official disclosures for the most accurate information using their CRD number. This is not investment advice.