Assets under management Growth by Quarter
Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.
Private Funds
Private funds reported by Black Dragon Capital Investment Management, Inc.
Employee Growth by Quarter
Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.
Historical AUM and employee figures reflect available SEC Form ADV filings under this CRD. Filing gaps may reflect registration status changes, dormant periods, state registration periods, firm restructuring, or other reporting changes. Rialytix does not interpolate missing periods.
Ownership
Reported direct and indirect ownership ranges
Reported ownership ranges
Highlighted bands show the percentage range reported in Form ADV.
Bars represent the reported range at that individual ownership step, not an estimated percentage of the advisory firm. Indirect relationships may refer to intermediate entities rather than directly to Black Dragon Capital Investment Management, Inc..
No indirect ownership information reported in the source’s Schedule B.
Reported ownership and control details
Form ADV · Filing date 2026-04-03 · Schedules A and B
| # | Owner / person & role | Interest in entity | Reported interest | Control person | Title / status acquired | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Louis HernandezCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERIndividual | BLACK DRAGON CAPITAL INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC | 75% or moreCode E | Yes | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER03/2014 | Schedule APDF page 90 |
| 2 | WADE CHRISTOPHER BOYLANCHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICERIndividual | BLACK DRAGON CAPITAL INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC | Less than 5%Code NA | No | CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER08/2023 | Schedule APDF page 90 |
| 3 | A. Christopher DucanesGENERAL COUNSELIndividual | BLACK DRAGON CAPITAL INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | GENERAL COUNSEL01/2022 | Schedule APDF page 90 |
Less than 5% may include zero. Code F identifies a role without specifying a percentage. Reported interests may overlap and may not include every owner. Total indirect ownership is not calculated.
Compliance & Disclosures
Filing dated 4/3/2026 9:56:01 AM
Responses were selected by the RIA in its filing. Questions are shortened for readability; “you” refers to the reporting firm, and some questions also cover advisory affiliates.
AFelonies2 No
In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:
- A1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a felony?No
- A2Been charged with a felony?No
BMisdemeanors2 No
In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:
- B1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a misdemeanor involving investments, an investment-related business, fraud, false statements or omissions, wrongful taking of property, bribery, perjury, forgery, counterfeiting, or extortion?No
- B2Been charged with a misdemeanor of the kind listed above?No
CSEC or CFTC actions2 Yes3 No
Has the SEC or CFTC ever:
- C1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
- C2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated SEC or CFTC regulations or statutes?Yes
- C3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- C4Entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?Yes
- C5Imposed a civil money penalty on you or an advisory affiliate, or ordered you or an advisory affiliate to cease and desist from any activity?No
DOther regulatory actions5 No
Has any other federal regulatory agency, state regulatory agency, or foreign financial regulatory authority ever:
- D1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission, or was dishonest, unfair, or unethical?No
- D2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related regulations or statutes?No
- D3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- D4In the past ten years, entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
- D5Denied, suspended, or revoked your or an advisory affiliate’s registration or license, or otherwise prevented association with an investment-related business or restricted activities?No
ESelf-regulatory organization actions4 No
Has a self-regulatory organization or commodities exchange ever:
- E1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
- E2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated its rules, other than a violation designated as a minor rule violation under an SEC-approved plan?No
- E3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- E4Disciplined you or an advisory affiliate by expulsion, suspension, barring association with other members, or otherwise restricting activities?No
FProfessional authorizations1 No
- FHas an authorization to act as an attorney, accountant, or federal contractor granted to you or an advisory affiliate ever been revoked or suspended?No
GPending regulatory proceedings1 No
- GAre you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a regulatory proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of C, D, or E?No
HCivil judicial actions and proceedings3 Yes1 No
(1) Court actions
Has a domestic or foreign court:
- H(1)(a)In the past ten years, enjoined you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?Yes
- H(1)(b)Found that you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related statutes or regulations?Yes
- H(1)(c)Dismissed, pursuant to a settlement agreement, an investment-related civil action brought against you or an advisory affiliate by a state or foreign financial regulatory authority?Yes
(2) Pending civil proceedings
- H(2)Are you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a civil proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of H(1)?No
Additional DRP filings 2 source blocks
Verbatim excerpts from supporting DRP filings, which may concern the firm or advisory affiliates. Amounts retain their filed labels; no total or attribution is inferred.
regulatory · block 1BLACK DRAGON CAPITAL, LLCPDF pages 102–104
- Advisory affiliate name — filed text
- BLACK DRAGON CAPITAL, LLC
- Regulator name — filed text
- U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Consent
Action status / disposition — filed text
ON SEPTEMBER 25, 2024, A FINAL JUDGMENT WAS ENTERED BY CONSENT AGAINST BLACK DRAGON CAPITAL, LLC AND BLACK DRAGON CAPITAL INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT (COLLECTIVELY, "BLACK DRAGON CAPITAL"), PERMANENTLY ENJOINING THEM FROM FUTURE VIOLATIONS OF SECTION 203(A) OF THE ADVISERS ACT, SECTION 204 OF THE ADVISERS ACT AND RULES 204(B)-1(A) AND 204-2(A)(16) THEREUNDER, SECTION 204A OF THE ADVISERS ACT AND RULE 204A-1 THEREUNDER, AND SECTION 206(4) OF THE ADVISERS ACT AND RULES 206(4)-1(A)(6), 206(4)-7, AND 206(4)-8 THEREUNDER.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
ON SEPTEMBER 25, 2024, A FINAL JUDGMENT WAS ENTERED BY CONSENT AGAINST BLACK DRAGON CAPITAL, LLC AND BLACK DRAGON CAPITAL INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT (COLLECTIVELY, "BLACK DRAGON CAPITAL"), PERMANENTLY ENJOINING THEM FROM FUTURE VIOLATIONS OF SECTION 203(A) OF THE ADVISERS ACT, SECTION 204 OF THE ADVISERS ACT AND RULES 204(B)-1(A) AND 204-2(A)(16) THEREUNDER, SECTION 204A OF THE ADVISERS ACT AND RULE 204A-1 THEREUNDER, AND SECTION 206(4) OF THE ADVISERS ACT AND RULES 206(4)-1(A)(6), 206(4)-7, AND 206(4)-8 THEREUNDER. THE COMMISSION'S COMPLAINT ALLEGED THAT BLACK DRAGON CAPITAL FAILED TO REGISTER AS INVESTMENT ADVISERS UNTIL APRIL 2024, FAILED TO FILE A REPORT ON THE COMMISSION'S FORM PF, VIOLATED THE COMMISSION'S MARKETING RULE THROUGH THEIR USE OF CERTAIN PERFORMANCE DATA ON THEIR WEBSITE, AND INCLUDED AN UNSUPPORTED PERFORMANCE FIGURE ON THEIR WEBSITE. THE COMMISSION'S COMPLAINT FURTHER ALLEGED THAT BLACK DRAGON CAPITAL INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INCLUDED MISLEADING PERFORMANCE DATA IN MARKETING MATERIALS. THE COMMISSION'S COMPLAINT ALSO ALLEGED THAT BLACK DRAGON CAPITAL FAILED TO MAINTAIN CERTAIN BOOKS AND RECORDS REGARDING PERFORMANCE DATA. FINALLY, THE COMMISSION'S COMPLAINT ALLEGED BLACK DRAGON CAPITAL FAILED TO ENFORCE THEIR CODE OF ETHICS, AND VIOLATED THE COMMISSION'S COMPLIANCE RULE BY FAILING TO ENFORCE THEIR COMPLIANCE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES, AND FAILING TO CONDUCT AND DOCUMENT, IN WRITING, AN ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REVIEW. BLACK DRAGON CAPITAL HAS CONSENTED, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE COMMISSION'S ALLEGATIONS, TO THE ENTRY OF THE ORDER INSTITUTING ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SECTION 203(E) OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940. BLACK DRAGON CAPITAL TAKE THE ALLEGATIONS VERY SERIOUSLY, AND HAVE ALREADY TAKEN CONCRETE STEPS TO REMEDIATE ANY MISTAKES THAT HAVE BEEN MADE.
Sanction detail — filed text
BLACK DRAGON CAPITAL HAS CONSENTED, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE COMMISSION'S ALLEGATIONS, TO THE ENTRY OF THE ORDER INSTITUTING ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SECTION 203(E) OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE CRD Number: 318634 This advisory affiliate is a Firm an Individual Registered: Yes No Name: BLACK DRAGON CAPITAL, LLC (For individuals, Last, First, Middle) This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. 2. Principal Sanction: Injunction Other Sanctions: 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 11/23/2021 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: INITIAL SUBPOENA FOR INFORMATION RECEIVED BY BLACK DRAGON ON NOVEMBER 23, 2021. 4. Docket/Case Number: 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: Other Other Product Types: PRIVATE FUNDS 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): ON SEPTEMBER 25, 2024, A FINAL JUDGMENT WAS ENTERED BY CONSENT AGAINST BLACK DRAGON CAPITAL, LLC AND BLACK DRAGON CAPITAL INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT (COLLECTIVELY, "BLACK DRAGON CAPITAL"), PERMANENTLY ENJOINING THEM FROM FUTURE VIOLATIONS OF SECTION 203(A) OF THE ADVISERS ACT, SECTION 204 OF THE ADVISERS ACT AND RULES 204(B)-1(A) AND 204-2(A)(16) THEREUNDER, SECTION 204A OF THE ADVISERS ACT AND RULE 204A-1 THEREUNDER, AND SECTION 206(4) OF THE ADVISERS ACT AND RULES 206(4)-1(A)(6), 206(4)-7, AND 206(4)-8 THEREUNDER. THE COMMISSION'S COMPLAINT ALLEGED THAT BLACK DRAGON CAPITAL FAILED TO REGISTER AS INVESTMENT ADVISERS UNTIL APRIL 2024, FAILED TO FILE A REPORT ON THE COMMISSION'S FORM PF, VIOLATED THE COMMISSION'S MARKETING RULE THROUGH THEIR USE OF CERTAIN PERFORMANCE DATA ON THEIR WEBSITE, AND INCLUDED AN UNSUPPORTED PERFORMANCE FIGURE ON THEIR WEBSITE. THE COMMISSION'S COMPLAINT FURTHER ALLEGED THAT BLACK DRAGON CAPITAL INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INCLUDED MISLEADING PERFORMANCE DATA IN MARKETING MATERIALS. THE COMMISSION'S COMPLAINT ALSO ALLEGED THAT BLACK DRAGON CAPITAL FAILED TO MAINTAIN CERTAIN BOOKS AND RECORDS REGARDING PERFORMANCE DATA. FINALLY, THE COMMISSION'S COMPLAINT ALLEGED BLACK DRAGON CAPITAL FAILED TO ENFORCE THEIR CODE OF ETHICS, AND VIOLATED THE COMMISSION'S COMPLIANCE RULE BY FAILING TO ENFORCE THEIR COMPLIANCE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES, AND FAILING TO CONDUCT AND DOCUMENT, IN WRITING, AN ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REVIEW. BLACK DRAGON CAPITAL HAS CONSENTED, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE COMMISSION'S ALLEGATIONS, TO THE ENTRY OF THE ORDER INSTITUTING ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SECTION 203(E) OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940. BLACK DRAGON CAPITAL TAKE THE ALLEGATIONS VERY SERIOUSLY, AND HAVE ALREADY TAKEN CONCRETE STEPS TO REMEDIATE ANY MISTAKES THAT HAVE BEEN MADE. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Consent 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 09/25/2024 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: BLACK DRAGON CAPITAL HAS CONSENTED, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE COMMISSION'S ALLEGATIONS, TO THE ENTRY OF THE ORDER INSTITUTING ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SECTION 203(E) OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1940. 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). ON SEPTEMBER 25, 2024, A FINAL JUDGMENT WAS ENTERED BY CONSENT AGAINST BLACK DRAGON CAPITAL, LLC AND BLACK DRAGON CAPITAL INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT (COLLECTIVELY, "BLACK DRAGON CAPITAL"), PERMANENTLY ENJOINING THEM FROM FUTURE VIOLATIONS OF SECTION 203(A) OF THE ADVISERS ACT, SECTION 204 OF THE ADVISERS ACT AND RULES 204(B)-1(A) AND 204-2(A)(16) THEREUNDER, SECTION 204A OF THE ADVISERS ACT AND RULE 204A-1 THEREUNDER, AND SECTION 206(4) OF THE ADVISERS ACT AND RULES 206(4)-1(A)(6), 206(4)-7, AND 206(4)-8 THEREUNDER.
civil judicial · block 1PDF pages 104–106
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Item 11.H. of Part 1A or Item 2.F. of Part 1B of Form ADV. Civil Judicial Check Part 1A item(s) being responded to: 11.H(1)(a) 11.H(1)(b) 11.H(1)(c) 11.H(2) Check Part 1B item(s) being responded to: 2.F(1) 2.F(2) 2.F(3) 2.F(4) 2.F(5) Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Item 11.H. of Part 1A or Item 2.F. of Part 1B. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. Unrelated civil judicial actions must be reported on separate DRPs. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE CRD Number: 318634 This advisory affiliate is a Firm an Individual Registered: Yes No Name: BLACK DRAGON CAPITAL, LLC (For individuals, Last, First, Middle) CRD Number: 7591698 This advisory affiliate is a Firm an Individual Registered: Yes No Name: Hernandez, Louis (For individuals, Last, First, Middle) This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.H. (1)(a), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Court Action initiated by: (Name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, SRO, commodities exchange, agency, firm, private plaintiff, etc.) U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 2. Principal Relief Sought: Injunction Other Relief Sought: CIVIL PENALTIES 3. Filing Date of Court Action (MM/DD/YYYY): 11/23/2021 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: INITIAL SUBPOENA FOR INFORMATION RECEIVED BY BLACK DRAGON ON NOVEMBER 23, 2021. 4. Principal Product Type: Other Other Product Types: PRIVATE FUNDS 5. Formal Action was brought in (include name of Federal, State or Foreign Court, Location of Court - City or County and State or Country, Docket/Case Number): U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. 6. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the civil judicial action (if applicable): 7. Describe the allegations related to this civil action (your response must fit within the space provided): ON SEPTEMBER 3, 2024, BLACK DRAGON CAPITAL, LLC, BLACK DRAGON CAPITAL INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT (COLLECTIVELY, "BLACK DRAGON"), AND LOUIS HERNANDEZ, JR. REACHED A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE STAFF OF THE DIVISION OF ENFORCEMENT OF THE US SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (THE "COMMISSION'). THE COMMISSION'S COMPLAINT ALLEGES THAT FROM AT LEAST DECEMBER 2021 TO MARCH 2024, BLACK DRAGON AND MR. HERNANDEZ IMPROPERLY FAILED TO REGISTER AS INVESTMENT ADVISERS WITH THE COMMISSION. THE COMPLAINT FURTHER ALLEGES THAT BLACK DRAGON AND MR. HERNANDEZ VIOLATED THE COMMISSION'S MARKETING RULE THROUGH THEIR USE OF CERTAIN PERFORMANCE DATA ON THEIR WEBSITE, PROVIDED MISLEADING PERFORMANCE INFORMATION IN BLACK DRAGON'S MARKETING MATERIALS, AND FAILED TO MAINTAIN CERTAIN BOOKS AND RECORDS, AMONG OTHER VIOLATIONS. THE COMMISSION'S COMPLAINT, PLED IN U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, CHARGES BLACK DRAGON AND MR. HERNANDEZ WITH VIOLATING SECTION 203(A), 204, AND 206(4) OF THE ADVISERS ACT AND RULES 204(B)-1(A), 206(4)-1(A)(6), AND 206(4)-8, THEREUNDER. THE COMPLAINT ALSO ALLEGES BLACK DRAGON VIOLATED SECTIONS 204(A), 204A, AND 206(4) OF THE ADVISERS ACT AND RULES 204-2(A)(16), 204A-1, AND 206(4)-7, THEREUNDER, AND THAT BLACK DRAGON AND MR. HERNANDEZ VIOLATED SECTION 206(4) OF THE ADVISERS ACT AND RULE 206(4)-8, THEREUNDER. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, action appealed to (provide name of court) and Date Appeal Filed (MM/DD/YYYY): 10. If pending, date notice/process was served (MM/DD/YYYY): Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 14 only. 11. How was matter resolved: Settled 12. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 09/03/2024 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 13. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered or Relief Granted(check appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 400,000.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions: C. Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement, or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: BLACK DRAGON AND MR. HERNANDEZ HAVE CONSENTED, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE COMMISSION'S ALLEGATIONS AND SUBJECT TO COURT APPROVAL, TO BE PERMANENTLY ENJOINED FROM VIOLATING THE CHARGED PROVISIONS OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS (I.E. SECTION 203(A), 204, 204(A), 204A, AND 206(4) OF THE ADVISERS ACT AND RULES 204(B)-1(A), 206(4)-1(A)(6), 204-2(A)(16), 204A-1, 206(4)-7, AND 206(4)-8, THEREUNDER) AND HAVE AGREED TO PAY CIVIL PENALTIES. 14. Provide a brief summary of circumstances related to the action(s), allegation(s), disposition(s) and/or finding(s) disclosed above (your response must fit within the space provided). ON SEPTEMBER 3, 2024, BLACK DRAGON AND LOUIS HERNANDEZ, JR. REACHED A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE STAFF OF THE DIVISION OF ENFORCEMENT OF THE COMMISSION. BLACK DRAGON AND MR. HERNANDEZ HAVE CONSENTED, WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE COMMISSION'S ALLEGATIONS AND SUBJECT TO COURT APPROVAL, TO BE PERMANENTLY ENJOINED FROM VIOLATING THE CHARGED PROVISIONS OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS (I.E. SECTION 203(A), 204, 204(A), 204A, AND 206(4) OF THE ADVISERS ACT AND RULES 204(B)-1(A), 206(4)-1(A)(6), 204-2(A)(16), 204A-1, 206(4)-7, AND 206(4)-8, THEREUNDER) AND HAVE AGREED TO PAY CIVIL PENALTIES.
* Metrics are based on the latest available data, including Form ADV filings, brochures, and relationship summaries pulled from the SEC IAPD, and may be subject to change. Learn what is included in the Rialytix data. Please refer to the firm's official disclosures for the most accurate information using their CRD number. This is not investment advice.