Assets under management Growth by Quarter
Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.
Private Funds
Private funds reported by Jupiter Asset Management Limited
Employee Growth by Quarter
Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.
Historical AUM and employee figures reflect available SEC Form ADV filings under this CRD. Filing gaps may reflect registration status changes, dormant periods, state registration periods, firm restructuring, or other reporting changes. Rialytix does not interpolate missing periods.
Ownership
Reported direct and indirect ownership ranges
Reported ownership ranges
Highlighted bands show the percentage range reported in Form ADV.
Bars represent the reported range at that individual ownership step, not an estimated percentage of the advisory firm. Indirect relationships may refer to intermediate entities rather than directly to Jupiter Asset Management Limited.
Reported ownership and control details
Form ADV · Filing date 2026-09-29 · Schedules A and B
| # | Owner / person & role | Interest in entity | Reported interest | Control person | Title / status acquired | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JUPITER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT GROUP LIMITEDSHAREHOLDERForeign entity | JUPITER ASSET MANAGEMENT LIMITED | 75% or moreCode E | Yes | SHAREHOLDER03/1991 | Schedule APDF page 49 |
| 2 | WAYNE NMN MEPHAMCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER & DIRECTOR, GROUP CHIEF FINANCE OFFICERIndividual | JUPITER ASSET MANAGEMENT LIMITED | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER & DIRECTOR, GROUP CHIEF FINANCE OFFICER09/2019 | Schedule APDF page 49 |
| 3 | MATTHEW CHARLES BEESLEYGROUP CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERIndividual | JUPITER ASSET MANAGEMENT LIMITED | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | GROUP CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER01/2022 | Schedule APDF page 49 |
| 4 | Tracey KinsellaDIRECTORIndividual | JUPITER ASSET MANAGEMENT LIMITED | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | DIRECTOR10/2022 | Schedule APDF page 49 |
| 5 | Catherine Elizabeth CarterCHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICERIndividual | JUPITER ASSET MANAGEMENT LIMITED | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER12/2022 | Schedule APDF page 49 |
| 6 | Thomas Nicholas OwenDIRECTORIndividual | JUPITER ASSET MANAGEMENT LIMITED | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | DIRECTOR07/2024 | Schedule APDF page 49 |
| 7 | Piers Adrian Carlyle HillierCHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICERIndividual | JUPITER ASSET MANAGEMENT LIMITED | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER02/2026 | Schedule APDF page 49 |
| 8 | KNIGHTSBRIDGE ASSET MANAGEMENT LIMITEDSHAREHOLDER - ORDINARY SHARESForeign entity | JUPITER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT GROUP LIMITED | 75% or moreCode E | Yes | SHAREHOLDER - ORDINARY SHARES09/2004 | Schedule BPDF page 50 |
| 9 | JUPITER ASSET MANAGEMENT GROUP LIMITEDSHAREHOLDER - ORDINARY SHARESForeign entity | KNIGHTSBRIDGE ASSET MANAGEMENT LIMITED | 75% or moreCode E | Yes | SHAREHOLDER - ORDINARY SHARES06/2007 | Schedule BPDF page 50 |
| 10 | JUPITER FUND MANAGEMENT GROUP LIMITEDSHAREHOLDER - ORDINARY SHARESForeign entity | JUPITER ASSET MANAGEMENT GROUP LIMITED | 75% or moreCode E | Yes | SHAREHOLDER - ORDINARY SHARES03/2007 | Schedule BPDF page 50 |
| 11 | JUPITER FUND MANAGEMENT PLCSHAREHOLDER - ORDINARY SHARESForeign entity | JUPITER FUND MANAGEMENT GROUP LIMITED | 75% or moreCode E | Yes | SHAREHOLDER - ORDINARY SHARES03/2007 | Schedule BPDF page 50 |
Less than 5% may include zero. Code F identifies a role without specifying a percentage. Reported interests may overlap and may not include every owner. Total indirect ownership is not calculated.
Compliance & Disclosures
Filing dated 3/31/2026 11:27:09 AM
Responses were selected by the RIA in its filing. Questions are shortened for readability; “you” refers to the reporting firm, and some questions also cover advisory affiliates.
AFelonies2 No
In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:
- A1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a felony?No
- A2Been charged with a felony?No
BMisdemeanors2 No
In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:
- B1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a misdemeanor involving investments, an investment-related business, fraud, false statements or omissions, wrongful taking of property, bribery, perjury, forgery, counterfeiting, or extortion?No
- B2Been charged with a misdemeanor of the kind listed above?No
CSEC or CFTC actions5 No
Has the SEC or CFTC ever:
- C1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
- C2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated SEC or CFTC regulations or statutes?No
- C3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- C4Entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
- C5Imposed a civil money penalty on you or an advisory affiliate, or ordered you or an advisory affiliate to cease and desist from any activity?No
DOther regulatory actions2 Yes3 No
Has any other federal regulatory agency, state regulatory agency, or foreign financial regulatory authority ever:
- D1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission, or was dishonest, unfair, or unethical?No
- D2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related regulations or statutes?Yes
- D3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- D4In the past ten years, entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?Yes
- D5Denied, suspended, or revoked your or an advisory affiliate’s registration or license, or otherwise prevented association with an investment-related business or restricted activities?No
ESelf-regulatory organization actions4 No
Has a self-regulatory organization or commodities exchange ever:
- E1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
- E2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated its rules, other than a violation designated as a minor rule violation under an SEC-approved plan?No
- E3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- E4Disciplined you or an advisory affiliate by expulsion, suspension, barring association with other members, or otherwise restricting activities?No
FProfessional authorizations1 No
- FHas an authorization to act as an attorney, accountant, or federal contractor granted to you or an advisory affiliate ever been revoked or suspended?No
GPending regulatory proceedings1 No
- GAre you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a regulatory proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of C, D, or E?No
HCivil judicial actions and proceedings4 No
(1) Court actions
Has a domestic or foreign court:
- H(1)(a)In the past ten years, enjoined you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
- H(1)(b)Found that you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related statutes or regulations?No
- H(1)(c)Dismissed, pursuant to a settlement agreement, an investment-related civil action brought against you or an advisory affiliate by a state or foreign financial regulatory authority?No
(2) Pending civil proceedings
- H(2)Are you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a civil proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of H(1)?No
Additional DRP filings 6 source blocks
Verbatim excerpts from supporting DRP filings, which may concern the firm or advisory affiliates. Amounts retain their filed labels; no total or attribution is inferred.
regulatory · block 1PDF pages 50–52
- Regulator name — filed text
- BAFIN - FEDERAL FINANCIAL SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 55,690.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Decision & Order of Offer of Settlement
Action status / disposition — filed text
THE FEDERAL FINANCIAL SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY OF GERMANY ("BAFIN") ALLEGED THAT JAM UK DID NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT PROCEDURES IN PLACE TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH GERMAN LAW REGARDING NOTIFICATION OF BAFIN OF SIGNIFICANT SHAREHOLDERS IN GERMAN SECURITIES. JAM UK PAID THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE ON MAY 6TH 2016.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
THE FEDERAL FINANCIAL SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY OF GERMANY ("BAFIN") ALLEGED THAT JUPITER ASSET MANAGEMENT LIMITED ("JAM UK") DID NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT PROCEDURES IN PLACE TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH GERMAN LAW REGARDING NOTIFICATION OF BAFIN OF SIGNIFICANT SHAREHOLDERS IN GERMAN SECURITIES
Sanction detail — filed text
NONE
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page.
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name).
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances:
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
Yes
No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1. Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC
Other Federal
State
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO)
BAFIN - FEDERAL FINANCIAL SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions:
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY):
04/05/2016
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
WA 17-WP 3120-2010/0024 WA 17-WP 3120-2012/0105 TO -/0110 WA 17-WP 3120-2012/0189 WA 17-WP 3120-2013/0117 TO -/0122
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types:
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE FEDERAL FINANCIAL SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY OF GERMANY ("BAFIN") ALLEGED THAT JUPITER ASSET MANAGEMENT LIMITED ("JAM UK") DID NOT
HAVE SUFFICIENT PROCEDURES IN PLACE TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH GERMAN LAW REGARDING NOTIFICATION OF BAFIN OF SIGNIFICANT
SHAREHOLDERS IN GERMAN SECURITIES
8.
Current Status?
Pending
On Appeal
Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Decision & Order of Offer of Settlement
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
05/06/2016
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 55,690.00
Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
Disgorgement/Restitution
Censure
Cease and Desist/Injunction
Bar
Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived:
NONE
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE FEDERAL FINANCIAL SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY OF GERMANY ("BAFIN") ALLEGED THAT JAM UK DID NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT PROCEDURES IN PLACE
TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH GERMAN LAW REGARDING NOTIFICATION OF BAFIN OF SIGNIFICANT SHAREHOLDERS IN GERMAN SECURITIES. JAM UK
PAID THE ADMINISTRATIVE FINE ON MAY 6TH 2016.regulatory · block 2JUPITER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LIMITEDPDF pages 52–54
- Advisory affiliate name — filed text
- JUPITER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LIMITED
- Regulator name — filed text
- FOREIGN - DANISH FINANCIAL SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Consent
Action status / disposition — filed text
ON MAY 8 2018, THE DANISH FSA DETERMINED THAT MERIAN GLOBAL INVESTORS (UK) ("MGI"), NOW KNOWN AS JUPITER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LIMITED, BREACHED THE REGULATION AND ISSUED A REPRIMAND. ON MAY 24 2018, THE DANISH FSA PUBLISHED INFORMATION REGARDING THE REPRIMAND ON ITS WEB PAGE.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
PURSUANT TO REGULATION (EU) NO. 236/2012 ON SHORT SELLING (THE "REGULATION"), MERIAN GLOBAL INVESTORS (UK) LIMITED ("MGI") IS REQUIRED TO FILE NET SHORT POSITION REPORTS (THE "REPORTS") WITH THE DANISH FINANCIAL SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY ("DANISH FSA") WHEN CERTAIN PRESCRIBED THRESHOLDS ARE CROSSED. IN NOVEMBER 2017, MGI'S COMPLIANCE FUNCTION IDENTIFIED AN ERROR IN THE MONITORING OF SUCH THRESHOLDS. MGI IMMEDIATELY COMMENCED AN IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS OF ALL DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH THE UNDERLYING CAUSE AND TO DETERMINE THE EXTENT OF THE ISSUE. ON JANUARY 25 2018, MGI NOTIFIED THE DANISH FSA OF ITS INADVERTENT FAILURE TO FILE THE REPORTS DURING THE PERIOD BETWEEN SEPTEMBER 2015 AND JANUARY 2018. MGI FILED THE DELINQUENT REPORTS AND PUT APPROPRIATE CONTROLS IN PLACE TO MITIGATE THE RISK OF THE ERROR REOCCURRING. THE DANISH FSA SUBSEQUENTLY FOUND THAT MGI BREACHED THE REGULATION BY FAILING TO FILE SUCH REPORTS.
Sanction detail — filed text
SEE DETAILS IN NUMBER 13 BELOW
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page.
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name).
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
155958
This advisory affiliate is
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
JUPITER INVESTMENT
MANAGEMENT LIMITED
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances:
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
Yes
No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1. Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC
Other Federal
State
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO)
FOREIGN - DANISH FINANCIAL SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY
2.
Principal Sanction:
Reprimand
Other Sanctions:
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY):
01/25/2018
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
J.NO. 6379-0091
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types:
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO REGULATION (EU) NO. 236/2012 ON SHORT SELLING (THE "REGULATION"), MERIAN GLOBAL INVESTORS (UK) LIMITED ("MGI") IS
REQUIRED TO FILE NET SHORT POSITION REPORTS (THE "REPORTS") WITH THE DANISH FINANCIAL SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY ("DANISH FSA") WHEN
CERTAIN PRESCRIBED THRESHOLDS ARE CROSSED. IN NOVEMBER 2017, MGI'S COMPLIANCE FUNCTION IDENTIFIED AN ERROR IN THE MONITORING OF
SUCH THRESHOLDS. MGI IMMEDIATELY COMMENCED AN IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS OF ALL DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH THE
UNDERLYING CAUSE AND TO DETERMINE THE EXTENT OF THE ISSUE. ON JANUARY 25 2018, MGI NOTIFIED THE DANISH FSA OF ITS INADVERTENT
FAILURE TO FILE THE REPORTS DURING THE PERIOD BETWEEN SEPTEMBER 2015 AND JANUARY 2018. MGI FILED THE DELINQUENT REPORTS AND PUT
APPROPRIATE CONTROLS IN PLACE TO MITIGATE THE RISK OF THE ERROR REOCCURRING. THE DANISH FSA SUBSEQUENTLY FOUND THAT MGI
BREACHED THE REGULATION BY FAILING TO FILE SUCH REPORTS.
8.
Current Status?
Pending
On Appeal
Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
05/08/2018
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
Monetary/Fine Amount: $
Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
Disgorgement/Restitution
Censure
Cease and Desist/Injunction
Bar
Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived:
SEE DETAILS IN NUMBER 13 BELOW
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON MAY 8 2018, THE DANISH FSA DETERMINED THAT MERIAN GLOBAL INVESTORS (UK) ("MGI"), NOW KNOWN AS JUPITER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT
LIMITED, BREACHED THE REGULATION AND ISSUED A REPRIMAND. ON MAY 24 2018, THE DANISH FSA PUBLISHED INFORMATION REGARDING THE
REPRIMAND ON ITS WEB PAGE.regulatory · block 3JUPITER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LIMITEDPDF pages 54–56
- Advisory affiliate name — filed text
- JUPITER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LIMITED
- Regulator name — filed text
- FOREIGN- COMISION NACIONAL DEL MERCADO DE VALORES IN SPAIN
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 225,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Consent
Action status / disposition — filed text
ON APRIL 12 2018, CNMV ISSUED AN ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTION THAT DETERMINED THAT MERIAN GLOBAL INVESTORS (UK) ("MGI"), NOW KNOWN AS JUPITER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LIMITED, BREACHED THE REGULATION AND IMPOSED A FINE OF EUR 200,000 (APPROXIMATELY USD 225,000). BECAUSE MGI COMPLIED WITH CERTAIN TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE SANCTION, MGI WAS ELIGIBLE FOR A 40% REDUCTION OF THE FINE (EUR 80,000). MGI PAID THE REDUCED FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF EUR 120,000 (APPROXIMATELY USD 135,000) EFFECTIVE JUNE 8 2018.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
PURSUANT TO REGULATION (EU) NO. 236/2012 ON SHORT SELLING (THE "REGULATION"), MERIAN GLOBAL INVESTORS (UK) LIMITED ("MGI") IS REQUIRED TO FILE NET SHORT POSITION REPORTS (THE "REPORTS") WITH THE COMISION NACIONAL DEL MERCADO DE VALORES IN SPAIN ("CNMV") WHEN CERTAIN PRESCRIBED THRESHOLDS ARE CROSSED. IN NOVEMBER 2017, MGI'S COMPLIANCE FUNCTION IDENTIFIED AN ERROR IN THE MONITORING OF SUCH THRESHOLDS. MGI IMMEDIATELY COMMENCED AN IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS OF ALL DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH THE UNDERLYING CAUSE AND TO DETERMINE THE EXTENT OF THE ISSUE. ON JANUARY 10 2018, MGI NOTIFIED THE CNMV OF ITS INADVERTENT FAILURE TO FILE THE REPORTS DURING THE PERIOD BETWEEN JULY 2014 AND DECEMBER 2017. MGI FILED THE DELINQUENT REPORTS AND PUT APPROPRIATE CONTROLS IN PLACE TO MITIGATE THE RISK OF THE ERROR REOCCURRING. CNMV SUBSEQUENTLY FOUND THAT MGI BREACHED THE REGULATION BY FAILING TO FILE SUCH REPORTS.
Sanction detail — filed text
SEE DETAILS IN NUMBER 13 BELOW
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page.
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name).
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
155958
This advisory affiliate is
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
JUPITER INVESTMENT
MANAGEMENT LIMITED
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances:
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
Yes
No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1. Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC
Other Federal
State
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO)
FOREIGN- COMISION NACIONAL DEL MERCADO DE VALORES IN SPAIN
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions:
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY):
01/10/2018
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
NO. 2018046592
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types:
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO REGULATION (EU) NO. 236/2012 ON SHORT SELLING (THE "REGULATION"), MERIAN GLOBAL INVESTORS (UK) LIMITED ("MGI") IS
REQUIRED TO FILE NET SHORT POSITION REPORTS (THE "REPORTS") WITH THE COMISION NACIONAL DEL MERCADO DE VALORES IN SPAIN ("CNMV")
WHEN CERTAIN PRESCRIBED THRESHOLDS ARE CROSSED. IN NOVEMBER 2017, MGI'S COMPLIANCE FUNCTION IDENTIFIED AN ERROR IN THE
MONITORING OF SUCH THRESHOLDS. MGI IMMEDIATELY COMMENCED AN IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS OF ALL DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS IN ORDER TO
ESTABLISH THE UNDERLYING CAUSE AND TO DETERMINE THE EXTENT OF THE ISSUE. ON JANUARY 10 2018, MGI NOTIFIED THE CNMV OF ITS
INADVERTENT FAILURE TO FILE THE REPORTS DURING THE PERIOD BETWEEN JULY 2014 AND DECEMBER 2017. MGI FILED THE DELINQUENT REPORTS
AND PUT APPROPRIATE CONTROLS IN PLACE TO MITIGATE THE RISK OF THE ERROR REOCCURRING. CNMV SUBSEQUENTLY FOUND THAT MGI BREACHED
THE REGULATION BY FAILING TO FILE SUCH REPORTS.
8.
Current Status?
Pending
On Appeal
Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
06/08/2018
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 225,000.00
Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
Disgorgement/Restitution
Censure
Cease and Desist/Injunction
Bar
Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived:
SEE DETAILS IN NUMBER 13 BELOW
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON APRIL 12 2018, CNMV ISSUED AN ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTION THAT DETERMINED THAT MERIAN GLOBAL INVESTORS (UK) ("MGI"), NOW KNOWN AS
JUPITER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LIMITED, BREACHED THE REGULATION AND IMPOSED A FINE OF EUR 200,000 (APPROXIMATELY USD 225,000).
BECAUSE MGI COMPLIED WITH CERTAIN TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE SANCTION, MGI WAS ELIGIBLE FOR A 40% REDUCTION OF THE FINE (EUR
80,000). MGI PAID THE REDUCED FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF EUR 120,000 (APPROXIMATELY USD 135,000) EFFECTIVE JUNE 8 2018.regulatory · block 4JUPITER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LIMITEDPDF pages 56–58
- Advisory affiliate name — filed text
- JUPITER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LIMITED
- Regulator name — filed text
- FOREIGN - FINANSINSPEKTION (THE SWEDISH FINANCIAL SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY)
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 80,436.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Consent
Action status / disposition — filed text
"ON JUNE 24, 2021, THE SWEDISH FSA DETERMINED THAT MGI BREACHED THE REGULATION AND ISSUED A PENALTY FEE OF SEK 700,000 (APPROXIMATELY $80,436). JUPITER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LIMITED PAID THE PENALTY FEE TO FINANSINSPEKTIONEN ON AUGUST 18 2021."
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
PURSUANT TO REGULATION (EU) NO. 236/2012 ON SHORT SELLING (THE "REGULATION"), JUPITER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LIMITED ("JIML") IS REQUIRED TO FILE NET SHORT POSITION REPORTS (THE "REPORTS") WITH FINANSINSPEKTIONEN (THE SWEDISH FINANCIAL SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY) ("SWEDISH FSA") WHEN CERTAIN PRESCRIBED THRESHOLDS ARE CROSSED. IN NOVEMBER 2017, THE COMPLIANCE FUNCTION OF MERIAN GLOBAL INVESTORS (UK) LIMITED ("MGI"), NOW KNOWN AS JIML, IDENTIFIED AN ERROR IN THE MONITORING OF SUCH THRESHOLDS. MGI IMMEDIATELY COMMENCED AN IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS OF ALL DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH THE UNDERLYING CAUSE AND TO DETERMINE THE EXTENT OF THE ISSUE. ON JANUARY 18 2018, MGI NOTIFIED THE SWEDISH FSA OF ITS INADVERTENT FAILURE TO FILE THE REPORTS DURING THE PERIOD BETWEEN APRIL 2016 AND JANUARY 2018. MGI FILED THE DELINQUENT REPORTS AND PUT APPROPRIATE CONTROLS IN PLACE TO MITIGATE THE RISK OF THE ERROR REOCCURRING. THE SWEDISH FSA SUBSEQUENTLY FOUND THAT MGI BREACHED THE REGULATION BY FAILING TO FILE SUCH REPORTS.
Sanction detail — filed text
SEE DETAILS IN NUMBER 13 BELOW
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page.
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name).
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
155958
This advisory affiliate is
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
JUPITER INVESTMENT
MANAGEMENT LIMITED
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances:
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
Yes
No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1. Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC
Other Federal
State
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO)
FOREIGN - FINANSINSPEKTION (THE SWEDISH FINANCIAL SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY)
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions:
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY):
01/18/2018
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
FI REF. NO. 18-3251
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types:
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO REGULATION (EU) NO. 236/2012 ON SHORT SELLING (THE "REGULATION"), JUPITER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LIMITED ("JIML") IS
REQUIRED TO FILE NET SHORT POSITION REPORTS (THE "REPORTS") WITH FINANSINSPEKTIONEN (THE SWEDISH FINANCIAL SUPERVISORY
AUTHORITY) ("SWEDISH FSA") WHEN CERTAIN PRESCRIBED THRESHOLDS ARE CROSSED. IN NOVEMBER 2017, THE COMPLIANCE FUNCTION OF MERIAN
GLOBAL INVESTORS (UK) LIMITED ("MGI"), NOW KNOWN AS JIML, IDENTIFIED AN ERROR IN THE MONITORING OF SUCH THRESHOLDS. MGI
IMMEDIATELY COMMENCED AN IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS OF ALL DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH THE UNDERLYING CAUSE AND TO
DETERMINE THE EXTENT OF THE ISSUE. ON JANUARY 18 2018, MGI NOTIFIED THE SWEDISH FSA OF ITS INADVERTENT FAILURE TO FILE THE REPORTS
DURING THE PERIOD BETWEEN APRIL 2016 AND JANUARY 2018. MGI FILED THE DELINQUENT REPORTS AND PUT APPROPRIATE CONTROLS IN PLACE TO
MITIGATE THE RISK OF THE ERROR REOCCURRING. THE SWEDISH FSA SUBSEQUENTLY FOUND THAT MGI BREACHED THE REGULATION BY FAILING TO
FILE SUCH REPORTS.
8.
Current Status?
Pending
On Appeal
Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
08/18/2021
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 80,436.00
Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
Disgorgement/Restitution
Censure
Cease and Desist/Injunction
Bar
Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived:
SEE DETAILS IN NUMBER 13 BELOW
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
"ON JUNE 24, 2021, THE SWEDISH FSA DETERMINED THAT MGI BREACHED THE REGULATION AND ISSUED A PENALTY FEE OF SEK 700,000
(APPROXIMATELY $80,436). JUPITER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LIMITED PAID THE PENALTY FEE TO FINANSINSPEKTIONEN ON AUGUST 18 2021."regulatory · block 5JUPITER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LIMITEDPDF pages 58–59
- Advisory affiliate name — filed text
- JUPITER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LIMITED
- Regulator name — filed text
- ( g g g y y ) THE AUTORITEIT FINANCIELE MARKTEN (THE NETHERLANDS AUTHORITY FOR FINANCIAL MARKETS)
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 298,353.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Consent
Action status / disposition — filed text
ON JUNE 24, 2021, THE AUTORITEIT FINANCIELE MARKTEN DETERMINED THAT MGI BREACHED THE REGULATION AND ISSUED A PENALTY FEE OF EUR 250,000. JUPITER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LIMITED PAID THE PENALTY FEE TO AUTORITEIT FINANCIELE MARKTEN ON DECEMBER 10 2021.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
PURSUANT TO REGULATION (EU) NO. 236/2012 ON SHORT SELLING (THE "REGULATION"), JUPITER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LIMITED ("JIML") IS REQUIRED TO FILE NET SHORT POSITION REPORTS (THE "REPORTS") WITH THE AUTORITEIT FINANCIELE MARKTEN (THE DUTCH FINANCIAL SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY) WHEN CERTAIN PRESCRIBED THRESHOLDS ARE CROSSED. IN NOVEMBER 2017, THE COMPLIANCE FUNCTION OF MERIAN GLOBAL INVESTORS (UK) LIMITED ("MGI"), NOW KNOWN AS JIML, IDENTIFIED AN ERROR IN THE MONITORING OF SUCH THRESHOLDS. MGI IMMEDIATELY COMMENCED AN IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS OF ALL DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH THE UNDERLYING CAUSE AND TO DETERMINE THE EXTENT OF THE ISSUE. ON JANUARY 18 2018, MGI NOTIFIED THE AUTORITEIT FINANCIELE MARKTEN OF ITS INADVERTENT FAILURE TO FILE THE REPORTS DURING THE PERIOD BETWEEN APRIL 2016 AND JANUARY 2018. MGI FILED THE DELINQUENT REPORTS AND PUT APPROPRIATE CONTROLS IN PLACE TO MITIGATE THE RISK OF THE ERROR REOCCURRING. THE AUTORITEIT FINANCIELE MARKTEN SUBSEQUENTLY FOUND THAT MGI BREACHED THE REGULATION BY FAILING TO FILE SUCH REPORTS.
Sanction detail — filed text
SEE DETAILS IN NUMBER 13 BELOW
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page.
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name).
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
155958
This advisory affiliate is
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
JUPITER INVESTMENT
MANAGEMENT LIMITED
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances:
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
Yes
No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1. Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC
Other Federal
State
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO)
(
g
g
g
y
y
)
THE AUTORITEIT FINANCIELE MARKTEN (THE NETHERLANDS AUTHORITY FOR FINANCIAL MARKETS)
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions:
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY):
01/18/2018
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types:
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO REGULATION (EU) NO. 236/2012 ON SHORT SELLING (THE "REGULATION"), JUPITER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LIMITED ("JIML") IS
REQUIRED TO FILE NET SHORT POSITION REPORTS (THE "REPORTS") WITH THE AUTORITEIT FINANCIELE MARKTEN (THE DUTCH FINANCIAL
SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY) WHEN CERTAIN PRESCRIBED THRESHOLDS ARE CROSSED. IN NOVEMBER 2017, THE COMPLIANCE FUNCTION OF MERIAN
GLOBAL INVESTORS (UK) LIMITED ("MGI"), NOW KNOWN AS JIML, IDENTIFIED AN ERROR IN THE MONITORING OF SUCH THRESHOLDS. MGI
IMMEDIATELY COMMENCED AN IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS OF ALL DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH THE UNDERLYING CAUSE AND TO
DETERMINE THE EXTENT OF THE ISSUE. ON JANUARY 18 2018, MGI NOTIFIED THE AUTORITEIT FINANCIELE MARKTEN OF ITS INADVERTENT FAILURE TO
FILE THE REPORTS DURING THE PERIOD BETWEEN APRIL 2016 AND JANUARY 2018. MGI FILED THE DELINQUENT REPORTS AND PUT APPROPRIATE
CONTROLS IN PLACE TO MITIGATE THE RISK OF THE ERROR REOCCURRING. THE AUTORITEIT FINANCIELE MARKTEN SUBSEQUENTLY FOUND THAT MGI
BREACHED THE REGULATION BY FAILING TO FILE SUCH REPORTS.
8.
Current Status?
Pending
On Appeal
Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/10/2021
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 298,353.00
Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
Disgorgement/Restitution
Censure
Cease and Desist/Injunction
Bar
Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived:
SEE DETAILS IN NUMBER 13 BELOW
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON JUNE 24, 2021, THE AUTORITEIT FINANCIELE MARKTEN DETERMINED THAT MGI BREACHED THE REGULATION AND ISSUED A PENALTY FEE OF EUR
250,000. JUPITER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LIMITED PAID THE PENALTY FEE TO AUTORITEIT FINANCIELE MARKTEN ON DECEMBER 10 2021.regulatory · block 6JUPITER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LIMITEDPDF pages 60–61
- Advisory affiliate name — filed text
- JUPITER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LIMITED
- Regulator name — filed text
- FOREIGN - COMMISSIONE NAZIONALE PER LE SOCIETA E LA BORSA (CONSOB)
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 180,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Consent
Action status / disposition — filed text
ON DECEMBER 13 2018, CONSOB ISSUED AN ADMISNTRATIVE SANCTION THAT DETERMINED THAT MGI BREACHED THE REGULATION AND IMPOSED A FINE OF EUR 160,000 (APPROXIMATELY USD 180,000). MGI PAID THE FINE IN FULL EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 4 2019.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
PURSUANT TO REGULATION (EU) NO. 236/2012 ON SHORT SELLING (THE "REGULATION"), MERIAN GLOBAL INVESTORS (UK) LIMITED ("MGI") IS REQUIRED TO FILE NET SHORT POSITION REPORTS (THE "REPORTS") WITH THE COMMISSIONE NAZIONALE PER LE SOCIETA E LA BORSA ("CONSOB") WHEN CERTAIN PRESCRIBED THRESHOLDS ARE CROSSED. IN NOVEMBER 2017, MGI'S COMPLIANCE FUNCTION IDENTIFIED AN ERROR IN THE MONITORING OF SUCH THRESHOLDS. MGI IMMEDIATELY COMMENCED AN IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS OF ALL DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH THE UNDERLYING CAUSE AND TO DETERMINE THE EXTENT OF THE ISSUE. ON JANUARY 10 2018, MGI NOTIFIED THE CONSOB OF ITS INADVERTENT FAILURE TO FILE THE REPORTS DURING THE PERIOD BETWEEN JULY 2014 AND JANUARY 2018. MGI FILED THE DELINQUENT REPORTS AND PUT APPROPRIATE CONTROLS IN PLACE TO MITIGATE THE RISK OF THE ERROR REOCCURRING. CONSOB SUBSEQUENTLY FOUND THAT MGI BREACHED THE REGULATION BY FAILING TO FILE SUCH REPORTS. IN MAKING ITS DETERMINATION, CONSOB NOTED THAT THE BREACH DID NOT MISLEAD INVESTORS OR GENERATE ANY PROFIT FOR MGI. ADDITIONALLY, MGI ADOPTED A COLLABORATIVE APPROACH WITH CONSOB AND DID NOT HAVE ANY PREVIOUS VIOLATIONS SANCTIONED BY CONSOB CONCERNING FINANCIAL MATTERS.
Sanction detail — filed text
SEE DETAILS IN NUMBER 13 BELOW
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page.
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name).
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
155958
This advisory affiliate is
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
JUPITER INVESTMENT
MANAGEMENT LIMITED
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances:
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
Yes
No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1. Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC
Other Federal
State
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO)
FOREIGN - COMMISSIONE NAZIONALE PER LE SOCIETA E LA BORSA (CONSOB)
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions:
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY):
(
)
01/10/2018
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
RESOLUTION NO. 20749
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types:
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
PURSUANT TO REGULATION (EU) NO. 236/2012 ON SHORT SELLING (THE "REGULATION"), MERIAN GLOBAL INVESTORS (UK) LIMITED ("MGI") IS
REQUIRED TO FILE NET SHORT POSITION REPORTS (THE "REPORTS") WITH THE COMMISSIONE NAZIONALE PER LE SOCIETA E LA BORSA ("CONSOB")
WHEN CERTAIN PRESCRIBED THRESHOLDS ARE CROSSED. IN NOVEMBER 2017, MGI'S COMPLIANCE FUNCTION IDENTIFIED AN ERROR IN THE
MONITORING OF SUCH THRESHOLDS. MGI IMMEDIATELY COMMENCED AN IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS OF ALL DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS IN ORDER TO
ESTABLISH THE UNDERLYING CAUSE AND TO DETERMINE THE EXTENT OF THE ISSUE. ON JANUARY 10 2018, MGI NOTIFIED THE CONSOB OF ITS
INADVERTENT FAILURE TO FILE THE REPORTS DURING THE PERIOD BETWEEN JULY 2014 AND JANUARY 2018. MGI FILED THE DELINQUENT REPORTS
AND PUT APPROPRIATE CONTROLS IN PLACE TO MITIGATE THE RISK OF THE ERROR REOCCURRING. CONSOB SUBSEQUENTLY FOUND THAT MGI
BREACHED THE REGULATION BY FAILING TO FILE SUCH REPORTS. IN MAKING ITS DETERMINATION, CONSOB NOTED THAT THE BREACH DID NOT
MISLEAD INVESTORS OR GENERATE ANY PROFIT FOR MGI. ADDITIONALLY, MGI ADOPTED A COLLABORATIVE APPROACH WITH CONSOB AND DID NOT
HAVE ANY PREVIOUS VIOLATIONS SANCTIONED BY CONSOB CONCERNING FINANCIAL MATTERS.
8.
Current Status?
Pending
On Appeal
Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
02/04/2019
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 180,000.00
Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
Disgorgement/Restitution
Censure
Cease and Desist/Injunction
Bar
Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived:
SEE DETAILS IN NUMBER 13 BELOW
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON DECEMBER 13 2018, CONSOB ISSUED AN ADMISNTRATIVE SANCTION THAT DETERMINED THAT MGI BREACHED THE REGULATION AND IMPOSED A
FINE OF EUR 160,000 (APPROXIMATELY USD 180,000). MGI PAID THE FINE IN FULL EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 4 2019.* Metrics are based on the latest available data, including Form ADV filings, brochures, and relationship summaries pulled from the SEC IAPD, and may be subject to change. Learn what is included in the Rialytix data. Please refer to the firm's official disclosures for the most accurate information using their CRD number. This is not investment advice.