Assets under management Growth by Quarter
Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.
Private Funds
Private funds reported by First Sentier Investors (Ireland) Limited
Employee Growth by Quarter
Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.
Historical AUM and employee figures reflect available SEC Form ADV filings under this CRD. Filing gaps may reflect registration status changes, dormant periods, state registration periods, firm restructuring, or other reporting changes. Rialytix does not interpolate missing periods.
Ownership
Reported direct and indirect ownership ranges
Reported ownership ranges
Highlighted bands show the percentage range reported in Form ADV.
Bars represent the reported range at that individual ownership step, not an estimated percentage of the advisory firm. Indirect relationships may refer to intermediate entities rather than directly to First Sentier Investors (Ireland) Limited.
Reported ownership and control details
Form ADV · Filing date 2026-06-15 · Schedules A and B
| # | Owner / person & role | Interest in entity | Reported interest | Control person | Title / status acquired | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bronwyn Corinna WrightINDEPENDENT NON- EXECUTIVE DIRECTORIndividual | FIRST SENTIER INVESTORS (IRELAND) LIMITED | Less than 5%Code NA | No | INDEPENDENT NON- EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR12/2018 | Schedule APDF page 50 |
| 2 | Peter Charles BlessingINDEPENDENT NON- EXECUTIVE DIRECTORIndividual | FIRST SENTIER INVESTORS (IRELAND) LIMITED | Less than 5%Code NA | No | INDEPENDENT NON- EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR12/2018 | Schedule APDF page 50 |
| 3 | FIRST SENTIER INVESTORS UK HOLDINGS LIMITEDSHAREHOLDERForeign entity | FIRST SENTIER INVESTORS (IRELAND) LIMITED | 75% or moreCode E | Yes | SHAREHOLDER12/2018 | Schedule APDF page 50 |
| 4 | Raymond Derek CullivanHEAD OF FSI IRELANDIndividual | FIRST SENTIER INVESTORS (IRELAND) LIMITED | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | HEAD OF FSI IRELAND05/2022 | Schedule APDF page 50 |
| 5 | Lisa Jane WarburtonGROUP GENERAL COUNSELIndividual | FIRST SENTIER INVESTORS (IRELAND) LIMITED | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | GROUP GENERAL COUNSEL02/2023 | Schedule APDF page 50 |
| 6 | AOIFE CLAIRE CONNOLLYCAPITAL AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT LEADIndividual | FIRST SENTIER INVESTORS (IRELAND) LIMITED | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | CAPITAL AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT LEAD08/2023 | Schedule APDF page 50 |
| 7 | Sharon Courtney PlunkettHEAD OF COMPLIANCEIndividual | FIRST SENTIER INVESTORS (IRELAND) LIMITED | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | HEAD OF COMPLIANCE08/2023 | Schedule APDF page 50 |
| 8 | Amanda Renee GazalCHIEF OPERATING OFFICERIndividual | FIRST SENTIER INVESTORS (IRELAND) LIMITED | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER02/2024 | Schedule APDF page 50 |
| 9 | Baronet Kerry-LeighNON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORIndividual | FIRST SENTIER INVESTORS (IRELAND) LIMITED | Less than 5%Code NA | No | NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR08/2025 | Schedule APDF page 51 |
| 10 | ASHLEY THOMAS ARMSTRONG CONNCHIEF FINANCIAL AND STRATEGY OFFICERIndividual | FIRST SENTIER INVESTORS (IRELAND) LIMITED | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | CHIEF FINANCIAL AND STRATEGY OFFICER06/2025 | Schedule APDF page 51 |
| 11 | ADA HARTENON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORIndividual | FIRST SENTIER INVESTORS (IRELAND) LIMITED | Less than 5%Code NA | No | NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR08/2025 | Schedule APDF page 51 |
| 12 | HARRY PATRICK MOOREGROUP CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERIndividual | FIRST SENTIER INVESTORS (IRELAND) LIMITED | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | GROUP CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER01/2026 | Schedule APDF page 51 |
| 13 | FIRST SENTIER GROUP LIMITEDSHAREHOLDERForeign entity | FIRST SENTIER INVESTORS UK HOLDINGS LIMITED | 75% or moreCode E | Yes | SHAREHOLDER08/2019 | Schedule BPDF page 51 |
| 14 | MITSUBISHI UFJ TRUST AND BANKING CORPORATIONSHAREHOLDERForeign entity | FIRST SENTIER GROUP LIMITED | 75% or moreCode E | Yes | SHAREHOLDER08/2019 | Schedule BPDF page 51 |
| 15 | MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP INC.SHAREHOLDERForeign entity | MITSUBISHI UFJ TRUST AND BANKING CORPORATION | 75% or moreCode E | Yes | SHAREHOLDER08/2019 | Schedule BPDF page 51 |
Less than 5% may include zero. Code F identifies a role without specifying a percentage. Reported interests may overlap and may not include every owner. Total indirect ownership is not calculated.
Compliance & Disclosures
Filing dated 6/15/2026 11:55:54 AM
Responses were selected by the RIA in its filing. Questions are shortened for readability; “you” refers to the reporting firm, and some questions also cover advisory affiliates.
AFelonies2 No
In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:
- A1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a felony?No
- A2Been charged with a felony?No
BMisdemeanors2 No
In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:
- B1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a misdemeanor involving investments, an investment-related business, fraud, false statements or omissions, wrongful taking of property, bribery, perjury, forgery, counterfeiting, or extortion?No
- B2Been charged with a misdemeanor of the kind listed above?No
CSEC or CFTC actions2 Yes3 No
Has the SEC or CFTC ever:
- C1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
- C2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated SEC or CFTC regulations or statutes?Yes
- C3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- C4Entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?Yes
- C5Imposed a civil money penalty on you or an advisory affiliate, or ordered you or an advisory affiliate to cease and desist from any activity?No
DOther regulatory actions3 Yes2 No
Has any other federal regulatory agency, state regulatory agency, or foreign financial regulatory authority ever:
- D1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission, or was dishonest, unfair, or unethical?Yes
- D2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related regulations or statutes?Yes
- D3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- D4In the past ten years, entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?Yes
- D5Denied, suspended, or revoked your or an advisory affiliate’s registration or license, or otherwise prevented association with an investment-related business or restricted activities?No
ESelf-regulatory organization actions4 No
Has a self-regulatory organization or commodities exchange ever:
- E1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
- E2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated its rules, other than a violation designated as a minor rule violation under an SEC-approved plan?No
- E3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- E4Disciplined you or an advisory affiliate by expulsion, suspension, barring association with other members, or otherwise restricting activities?No
FProfessional authorizations1 No
- FHas an authorization to act as an attorney, accountant, or federal contractor granted to you or an advisory affiliate ever been revoked or suspended?No
GPending regulatory proceedings1 No
- GAre you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a regulatory proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of C, D, or E?No
HCivil judicial actions and proceedings1 Yes3 No
(1) Court actions
Has a domestic or foreign court:
- H(1)(a)In the past ten years, enjoined you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
- H(1)(b)Found that you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related statutes or regulations?No
- H(1)(c)Dismissed, pursuant to a settlement agreement, an investment-related civil action brought against you or an advisory affiliate by a state or foreign financial regulatory authority?Yes
(2) Pending civil proceedings
- H(2)Are you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a civil proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of H(1)?No
Additional DRP filings 7 source blocks
Verbatim excerpts from supporting DRP filings, which may concern the firm or advisory affiliates. Amounts retain their filed labels; no total or attribution is inferred.
regulatory · block 1MUFG BANK, LTD.PDF pages 52–53
- Advisory affiliate name — filed text
- MUFG BANK, LTD.
- Regulator name — filed text
- PRUDENTIAL REGULATION AUTHORITY
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 10,847,445.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Settled
Action status / disposition — filed text
THE PRUDENTIAL REGULATION AUTHORITY ("PRA") IMPOSED A FINE OF 17.85M POUNDS ON MUFG AND A FINE OF 8.925MPOUNDS ON MUFG SECURITIES EMEA PLC FOR FAILING TO BE OPEN AND COOPERATIVE WITH THE PRA IN RELATION TOAN ENFORCEMENT ACTION ON MUFG BY THE NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
THE PRUDENTIAL REGULATION AUTHORITY ("PRA") IMPOSED A FINE OF 17.85M POUNDS ON MUFG AND A FINE OF 8.925MPOUNDS ON MUFG SECURITIES EMEA PLC FOR FAILING TO BE OPEN AND COOPERATIVE WITH THE PRA IN RELATION TO AN ENFORCEMENT ACTION ON MUFG BY THE NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES
Sanction detail — filed text
THE PRUDENTIAL REGULATION AUTHORITY ("PRA") IMPOSED A FINE OF 17.85M POUNDS ON MUFG AND A FINE OF8.925M POUNDS ON MUFG SECURITIES EMEA PLC FOR FAILING TO BE OPEN AND COOPERATIVE WITH THE PRA INRELATION TO AN ENFORCEMENT ACTION ON MUFG BY THE NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page.
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name).
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
MUFG BANK, LTD.
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances:
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
Yes
No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1. Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC
Other Federal
State
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO)
PRUDENTIAL REGULATION AUTHORITY
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions:
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY):
02/09/2017
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types:
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE PRUDENTIAL REGULATION AUTHORITY ("PRA") IMPOSED A FINE OF 17.85M POUNDS ON MUFG AND A FINE OF 8.925MPOUNDS ON MUFG
SECURITIES EMEA PLC FOR FAILING TO BE OPEN AND COOPERATIVE WITH THE PRA IN RELATION TO AN ENFORCEMENT ACTION ON MUFG BY THE NEW
YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES
8.
Current Status?
Pending
On Appeal
Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Settled
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
02/09/2017
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 10,847,445.00
Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
Disgorgement/Restitution
Censure
Cease and Desist/Injunction
Bar
Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived:
THE PRUDENTIAL REGULATION AUTHORITY ("PRA") IMPOSED A FINE OF 17.85M POUNDS ON MUFG AND A FINE OF8.925M POUNDS ON MUFG
SECURITIES EMEA PLC FOR FAILING TO BE OPEN AND COOPERATIVE WITH THE PRA INRELATION TO AN ENFORCEMENT ACTION ON MUFG BY THE
NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE PRUDENTIAL REGULATION AUTHORITY ("PRA") IMPOSED A FINE OF 17.85M POUNDS ON MUFG AND A FINE OF 8.925MPOUNDS ON MUFG
SECURITIES EMEA PLC FOR FAILING TO BE OPEN AND COOPERATIVE WITH THE PRA IN RELATION TOAN ENFORCEMENT ACTION ON MUFG BY THE NEW
YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICESregulatory · block 2MUFG BANK, LTD.PDF pages 53–55
- Advisory affiliate name — filed text
- MUFG BANK, LTD.
- Regulator name — filed text
- NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 315,000,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Settled
Action status / disposition — filed text
MUFG WRONGFULLY MISLED THE NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES (DFS) IN CONNECTION WITH ITS UNDERSTANDING OF MUFG'S U.S. DOLLAR CLEARING SERVICES ON BEHALF OF SANCTIONED SUNDANESE, IRANIANAND BURMESE PARTIES. UNDER THE TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT WITH DFS, MUFG HAS MADE A PAYMENT OF US$315MILLION TO DFS. AFTER THOSE CONSENT ORDERS, MUFG TOOK ACTIONS AGAINST PERSONS INVOLVED IN THE MATTER AT THAT TIME AND RELOCATED ITS U.S. BSA/AML AND OFAC SANCTIONS COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS TO NEW YORK. IN ADDITION, DFS DESIGNATED A THIRD PARTY ORGANIZATION TO CONDUCT A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF MUFG'SBSA/AML RELATED COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS, POLICIES, AND PROCEDURES AND TO IMPLEMENT CORRECTIVE MEASURES TO ADDRESS ANY FLAWS, WEAKNESSES, OR DEFICIENCIES AS THEY ARE IDENTIFIED. UPON MUFG'S CONVERSION TO OCC REGULATION ON NOVEMBER 7, 2017, THE DFS CONSENT ORDERS WERE REPLACED BY A NEW OCC CONSENT ORDER,WHICH REQUIRED MUFG TO DELIVER RELATED ACTION PLANS AND REPORTS TO THE OCC SUCH THAT THE OCC COULD REGULATE THE MATTER ON A GOING-FORWARD BASIS.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
MUFG WRONGFULLY MISLED THE NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES (DFS) IN CONNECTION WITH ITS UNDERSTANDING OF MUFG'S U.S. DOLLAR CLEARING SERVICES ON BEHALF OF SANCTIONED SUNDANESE, IRANIAN AND BURMESE PARTIES. UNDER THE TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT WITH DFS, MUFG HAS MADE A PAYMENT OF US$315MILLION TO DFS. AFTER THOSE CONSENT ORDERS, MUFG TOOK ACTIONS AGAINST PERSONS INVOLVED IN THE MATTERAT THAT TIME AND RELOCATED ITS U.S. BSA/AML AND OFAC SANCTIONS COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS TO NEW YORK. INADDITION, DFS DESIGNATED A THIRD PARTY ORGANIZATION TO CONDUCT A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF MUFG'SBSA/AML RELATED COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS, POLICIES, AND PROCEDURES AND TO IMPLEMENT CORRECTIVE MEASURESTO ADDRESS ANY FLAWS, WEAKNESSES, OR DEFICIENCIES AS THEY ARE IDENTIFIED. UPON MUFG'S CONVERSION TOOCC REGULATION ON NOVEMBER 7, 2017, THE DFS CONSENT ORDERS WERE REPLACED BY A NEW OCC CONSENT ORDER,WHICH REQUIRED MUFG TO DELIVER RELATED ACTION PLANS AND REPORTS TO THE OCC SUCH THAT THE OCC COULDREGULATE THE MATTER ON A GOING-FORWARD BASIS.
Sanction detail — filed text
MUFG WILL MAKE FULL PAYMENT OF A CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY OF $315,000,000 WITHIN 10 BUSINESS DAYS OFTHE CONSENT ORDER.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE CRD Number: This advisory affiliate is a Firm an Individual Registered: Yes No Name: MUFG BANK, LTD. (For individuals, Last, First, Middle) This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES 2. Principal Sanction: Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s) Other Sanctions: 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 11/18/2014 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: No Product Other Product Types: 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): MUFG WRONGFULLY MISLED THE NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES (DFS) IN CONNECTION WITH ITS UNDERSTANDING OF MUFG'S U.S. DOLLAR CLEARING SERVICES ON BEHALF OF SANCTIONED SUNDANESE, IRANIAN AND BURMESE PARTIES. UNDER THE TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT WITH DFS, MUFG HAS MADE A PAYMENT OF US$315MILLION TO DFS. AFTER THOSE CONSENT ORDERS, MUFG TOOK ACTIONS AGAINST PERSONS INVOLVED IN THE MATTERAT THAT TIME AND RELOCATED ITS U.S. BSA/AML AND OFAC SANCTIONS COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS TO NEW YORK. INADDITION, DFS DESIGNATED A THIRD PARTY ORGANIZATION TO CONDUCT A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF MUFG'SBSA/AML RELATED COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS, POLICIES, AND PROCEDURES AND TO IMPLEMENT CORRECTIVE MEASURESTO ADDRESS ANY FLAWS, WEAKNESSES, OR DEFICIENCIES AS THEY ARE IDENTIFIED. UPON MUFG'S CONVERSION TOOCC REGULATION ON NOVEMBER 7, 2017, THE DFS CONSENT ORDERS WERE REPLACED BY A NEW OCC CONSENT ORDER,WHICH REQUIRED MUFG TO DELIVER RELATED ACTION PLANS AND REPORTS TO THE OCC SUCH THAT THE OCC COULDREGULATE THE MATTER ON A GOING-FORWARD BASIS. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Settled 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 11/18/2014 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 315,000,000.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: UPON MUFG'S CONVERSION TO OCC REGULATION ON NOVEMBER 7, 2017, THE DFS CONSENT ORDERS WEREREPLACED BY A NEW OCC CONSENT ORDER, WHICH REQUIRED MUFG TO DELIVER RELATED ACTION PLANS ANDREPORTS TO THE OCC SUCH THAT THE OCC COULD REGULATE THE MATTER ON A GOING-FORWARD BASIS. Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: MUFG WILL MAKE FULL PAYMENT OF A CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY OF $315,000,000 WITHIN 10 BUSINESS DAYS OFTHE CONSENT ORDER. 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). MUFG WRONGFULLY MISLED THE NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES (DFS) IN CONNECTION WITH ITS UNDERSTANDING OF MUFG'S U.S. DOLLAR CLEARING SERVICES ON BEHALF OF SANCTIONED SUNDANESE, IRANIANAND BURMESE PARTIES. UNDER THE TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT WITH DFS, MUFG HAS MADE A PAYMENT OF US$315MILLION TO DFS. AFTER THOSE CONSENT ORDERS, MUFG TOOK ACTIONS AGAINST PERSONS INVOLVED IN THE MATTER AT THAT TIME AND RELOCATED ITS U.S. BSA/AML AND OFAC SANCTIONS COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS TO NEW YORK. IN ADDITION, DFS DESIGNATED A THIRD PARTY ORGANIZATION TO CONDUCT A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF MUFG'SBSA/AML RELATED COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS, POLICIES, AND PROCEDURES AND TO IMPLEMENT CORRECTIVE MEASURES TO ADDRESS ANY FLAWS, WEAKNESSES, OR DEFICIENCIES AS THEY ARE IDENTIFIED. UPON MUFG'S CONVERSION TO OCC REGULATION ON NOVEMBER 7, 2017, THE DFS CONSENT ORDERS WERE REPLACED BY A NEW OCC CONSENT ORDER,WHICH REQUIRED MUFG TO DELIVER RELATED ACTION PLANS AND REPORTS TO THE OCC SUCH THAT THE OCC COULD REGULATE THE MATTER ON A GOING-FORWARD BASIS.
regulatory · block 3MUFG BANK, LTD.PDF pages 55–57
- Advisory affiliate name — filed text
- MUFG BANK, LTD.
- Regulator name — filed text
- EUROPEAN COMMISSION
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 77,865,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Settled
Action status / disposition — filed text
ON MAY 16, 2019, THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION (THE "COMMISSION") IN A SETTLEMENT DECISION FINED AFFILIATE MUFG BANK LTD. ("MUFG BANK") ALONG WITH SEVERAL OTHER BANKS FOR VIOLATING EUROPEAN UNION ANTITRUST RULES IN CONNECTION WITH TRADING IN THE SPOT FOREIGN EXCHANGE MARKET FOR 11 CURRENCIES. THE COMMISSION'S INVESTIGATION FOUND THAT INDIVIDUAL TRADERS INVOLVED IN THE FOREX SPOT TRADING OF THE CURRENCIES, WHICH INCLUDED ONE FORMER MUFG BANK TRADER WHO WAS BASED IN LONDON, HAD EXCHANGED SENSITIVE INFORMATION AND TRADING PLANS AND OCCASIONALLY COORDINATED TRADING STRATEGIES THROUGH VARIOUS ONLINE PROFESSIONAL CHATROOMS. THE PERIOD OF INFRINGEMENT WAS SEPTEMBER 2010 TO SEPTEMBER2011 FOR MUFG BANK. THE TOTAL FINE ISSUED BY THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION AGAINST THE BANKS WAS EUR 1.07BILLION. THE PORTION REQUIRED TO BE PAID BY MUFG BANK LTD. WAS EUR 69,750,000 (APPROXIMATELY) $77.865MILLION).
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
ON MAY 16, 2019, THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION (THE "COMMISSION") IN A SETTLEMENT DECISION FINED AFFILIATE MUFG BANK LTD. ("MUFG BANK") ALONG WITH SEVERAL OTHER BANKS FOR VIOLATING EUROPEAN UNION ANTITRUST RULES IN CONNECTION WITH TRADING IN THE SPOT FOREIGN EXCHANGE MARKET FOR 11 CURRENCIES. THE COMMISSION'S INVESTIGATION FOUND THAT INDIVIDUAL TRADERS INVOLVED IN THE FOREX SPOT TRADING OF THE CURRENCIES, WHICH INCLUDED ONE FORMER MUFG BANK TRADER WHO WAS BASED IN LONDON, HAD EXCHANGED SENSITIVE INFORMATION AND TRADING PLANS AND OCCASIONALLY COORDINATED TRADING STRATEGIES THROUGH VARIOUS ONLINE PROFESSIONAL CHATROOMS. THE PERIOD OF INFRINGEMENT WAS SEPTEMBER 2010 TO SEPTEMBER2011 FOR MUFG BANK.
Sanction detail — filed text
THE TOTAL FINE ISSUED BY THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION AGAINST THE BANKS WAS EUR 1.07 BILLION. THEPORTION REQUIRED TO BE PAID BY MUFG BANK LTD. WAS EUR 69,750,000 (APPROXIMATELY $77.865 MILLION).
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page.
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name).
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
MUFG BANK, LTD.
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances:
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
Yes
No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1. Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC
Other Federal
State
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO)
EUROPEAN COMMISSION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions:
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY):
05/16/2019
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
AT.40135
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other
Other Product Types:
FOREIGN EXCHANGE SPOT
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
ON MAY 16, 2019, THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION (THE "COMMISSION") IN A SETTLEMENT DECISION FINED AFFILIATE MUFG BANK LTD. ("MUFG BANK")
ALONG WITH SEVERAL OTHER BANKS FOR VIOLATING EUROPEAN UNION ANTITRUST RULES IN CONNECTION WITH TRADING IN THE SPOT FOREIGN
EXCHANGE MARKET FOR 11 CURRENCIES. THE COMMISSION'S INVESTIGATION FOUND THAT INDIVIDUAL TRADERS INVOLVED IN THE FOREX SPOT
TRADING OF THE CURRENCIES, WHICH INCLUDED ONE FORMER MUFG BANK TRADER WHO WAS BASED IN LONDON, HAD EXCHANGED SENSITIVE
INFORMATION AND TRADING PLANS AND OCCASIONALLY COORDINATED TRADING STRATEGIES THROUGH VARIOUS ONLINE PROFESSIONAL
CHATROOMS. THE PERIOD OF INFRINGEMENT WAS SEPTEMBER 2010 TO SEPTEMBER2011 FOR MUFG BANK.
8.
Current Status?
Pending
On Appeal
Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Settled
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
05/16/2019
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 77,865,000.00
Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
Disgorgement/Restitution
Censure
Cease and Desist/Injunction
Bar
Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived:
THE TOTAL FINE ISSUED BY THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION AGAINST THE BANKS WAS EUR 1.07 BILLION. THEPORTION REQUIRED TO BE PAID BY
MUFG BANK LTD. WAS EUR 69,750,000 (APPROXIMATELY $77.865 MILLION).
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON MAY 16, 2019, THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION (THE "COMMISSION") IN A SETTLEMENT DECISION FINED AFFILIATE MUFG BANK LTD. ("MUFG BANK")
ALONG WITH SEVERAL OTHER BANKS FOR VIOLATING EUROPEAN UNION ANTITRUST RULES IN CONNECTION WITH TRADING IN THE SPOT FOREIGN
EXCHANGE MARKET FOR 11 CURRENCIES. THE COMMISSION'S INVESTIGATION FOUND THAT INDIVIDUAL TRADERS INVOLVED IN THE FOREX SPOT
TRADING OF THE CURRENCIES, WHICH INCLUDED ONE FORMER MUFG BANK TRADER WHO WAS BASED IN LONDON, HAD EXCHANGED SENSITIVE
INFORMATION AND TRADING PLANS AND OCCASIONALLY COORDINATED TRADING STRATEGIES THROUGH VARIOUS ONLINE PROFESSIONAL
CHATROOMS. THE PERIOD OF INFRINGEMENT WAS SEPTEMBER 2010 TO SEPTEMBER2011 FOR MUFG BANK. THE TOTAL FINE ISSUED BY THE EUROPEAN
COMMISSION AGAINST THE BANKS WAS EUR 1.07BILLION. THE PORTION REQUIRED TO BE PAID BY MUFG BANK LTD. WAS EUR 69,750,000
(APPROXIMATELY) $77.865MILLION).regulatory · block 4MUFG BANK, LTD.PDF pages 57–59
- Advisory affiliate name — filed text
- MUFG BANK, LTD.
- Regulator name — filed text
- COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION ('CFTC')
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 600,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Settled
Action status / disposition — filed text
FINED $600,000 AND ORDERED TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM VIOLATING THE COMMODITY EXCHANGE ACT'S PROHIBITION AGAINST SPOOFING.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OR CONCLUSIONS IN THE ORDER, MUFG CONSENTED TO THE ENTRYOF THE ORDER WHICH FOUND THAT FROM AT LEAST JULY 2009 TO DECEMBER 2014, MUFG, BY AND THROUGH ONE OF ITSTRADERS LOCATED IN JAPAN, ENGAGED IN THE DISRUPTIVE TRADING PRACTICE OF "SPOOFING" VARIOUS FUTURES PRODUCTS TRADED ON DESIGNATED CONTRACT MARKETS IN THE UNITED STATES IN VIOLATION OF CEA SECTION 4C(A)(5)
Sanction detail — filed text
FINED $600,000 AND ORDERED TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM VIOLATING THE COMMODITY EXCHANGE ACT'S PROHIBITION AGAINST SPOOFING.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page.
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name).
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
MUFG BANK, LTD.
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances:
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
Yes
No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1. Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC
Other Federal
State
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO)
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION ('CFTC')
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions:
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY):
02/19/2015
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
17-21
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Futures - Financial
Other Product Types:
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS OR CONCLUSIONS IN THE ORDER, MUFG CONSENTED TO THE ENTRYOF THE ORDER WHICH FOUND
THAT FROM AT LEAST JULY 2009 TO DECEMBER 2014, MUFG, BY AND THROUGH ONE OF ITSTRADERS LOCATED IN JAPAN, ENGAGED IN THE DISRUPTIVE
TRADING PRACTICE OF "SPOOFING" VARIOUS FUTURES PRODUCTS TRADED ON DESIGNATED CONTRACT MARKETS IN THE UNITED STATES IN VIOLATION
OF CEA SECTION 4C(A)(5)
8.
Current Status?
Pending
On Appeal
Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Settled
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
08/07/2017
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 600,000.00
Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
Disgorgement/Restitution
Censure
Cease and Desist/Injunction
Bar
Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived:
FINED $600,000 AND ORDERED TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM VIOLATING THE COMMODITY EXCHANGE ACT'S PROHIBITION AGAINST SPOOFING.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
FINED $600,000 AND ORDERED TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM VIOLATING THE COMMODITY EXCHANGE ACT'S PROHIBITION AGAINST SPOOFING.regulatory · block 5MUFG BANK, LTD.PDF pages 59–61
- Advisory affiliate name — filed text
- MUFG BANK, LTD.
- Regulator name — filed text
- COMPETITION COMMISSION (SWITZERLAND)
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 1,499,880.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Settled
Action status / disposition — filed text
THE TOTAL FINE ISSUED BY SWITZERLAND'S COMPETITION COMMISSION AGAINST THE BANKS WAS APPROXIMATELY CHF 90 MILLION, AND THE PORTION REQUIRED TO BE PAID BY MUFG BANK WAS APPROXIMATELY CHF 1.5 MILLION
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
ON JUNE 6, 2019, SWITZERLAND'S COMPETITION COMMISSION (THE "COMPETITION COMMISSION") CONCLUDED AMICABLE SETTLEMENTS WITH SEVERAL BANKS, INCLUDING AFFILIATE MUFG BANK LTD. ("MUFG BANK"), AND FINED THE BANKS FOR PARTICIPATING IN ANTI-COMPETITIVE ARRANGEMENTS IN FOREIGN EXCHANGE SPOT TRADING. THE COMPETITION COMMISSION FOUND THAT TRADERS FROM THE BANKS, WHICH INCLUDED ONE FORMER MUFG BANK TRADER WHO WAS BASED IN LONDON, PARTIALLY COORDINATED THEIR CONDUCT IN FOREIGN EXCHANGE SPOT MARKETS FOR SEVERAL G10 CURRENCIES THROUGH THE USE OF CHATROOMS. THE RELEVANT PERIOD FOR MUFG BANK WAS SEPTEMBER 2010 TO SEPTEMBER 2011. THIS RELATES TO THE SAME ISSUE FOR WHICH MUFG BANK WAS RECENTLY FINED BY THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION IN LATE MAY 2019.
Sanction detail — filed text
THE TOTAL FINE ISSUED BY SWITZERLAND'S COMPETITION COMMISSION AGAINST THE BANKS WAS APPROXIMATELY CHF 90 MILLION, AND THE PORTION REQUIRED TO BE PAID BY MUFG BANK WAS APPROXIMATELY CHF 1.5 MILLION
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page.
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name).
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
MUFG BANK, LTD.
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances:
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
Yes
No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1. Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC
Other Federal
State
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO)
COMPETITION COMMISSION (SWITZERLAND)
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions:
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY):
06/06/2019
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other
Other Product Types:
FOREIGN EXCHANGE SPOT
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
ON JUNE 6, 2019, SWITZERLAND'S COMPETITION COMMISSION (THE "COMPETITION COMMISSION") CONCLUDED AMICABLE SETTLEMENTS WITH
SEVERAL BANKS, INCLUDING AFFILIATE MUFG BANK LTD. ("MUFG BANK"), AND FINED THE BANKS FOR PARTICIPATING IN ANTI-COMPETITIVE
ARRANGEMENTS IN FOREIGN EXCHANGE SPOT TRADING. THE COMPETITION COMMISSION FOUND THAT TRADERS FROM THE BANKS, WHICH INCLUDED
ONE FORMER MUFG BANK TRADER WHO WAS BASED IN LONDON, PARTIALLY COORDINATED THEIR CONDUCT IN FOREIGN EXCHANGE SPOT MARKETS
FOR SEVERAL G10 CURRENCIES THROUGH THE USE OF CHATROOMS. THE RELEVANT PERIOD FOR MUFG BANK WAS SEPTEMBER 2010 TO SEPTEMBER
2011. THIS RELATES TO THE SAME ISSUE FOR WHICH MUFG BANK WAS RECENTLY FINED BY THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION IN LATE MAY 2019.
8.
Current Status?
Pending
On Appeal
Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Settled
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
06/06/2019
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 1,499,880.00
Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
Disgorgement/Restitution
Censure
Cease and Desist/Injunction
Bar
Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived:
THE TOTAL FINE ISSUED BY SWITZERLAND'S COMPETITION COMMISSION AGAINST THE BANKS WAS APPROXIMATELY CHF 90 MILLION, AND THE
PORTION REQUIRED TO BE PAID BY MUFG BANK WAS APPROXIMATELY CHF 1.5 MILLION
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE TOTAL FINE ISSUED BY SWITZERLAND'S COMPETITION COMMISSION AGAINST THE BANKS WAS APPROXIMATELY CHF 90 MILLION, AND THE
PORTION REQUIRED TO BE PAID BY MUFG BANK WAS APPROXIMATELY CHF 1.5 MILLIONregulatory · block 6MUFG BANK, LTD.PDF pages 61–63
- Advisory affiliate name — filed text
- MUFG BANK, LTD.
- Regulator name — filed text
- OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY (OCC)
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Order
Action status / disposition — filed text
THE OCC ISSUED ON FEBRUARY 22, 2019 A CEASE AND DESIST ORDER AGAINST THE NEW YORK (PRIMARY), CHICAGO,AND LOS ANGELES FEDERAL BRANCHES OF THE FIRM'S AFFILIATE, MUFG BANK, LTD., TOKYO, JAPAN, FOR VIOLATING THEBANK SECRECY ACT (BSA) AND ITS UNDERLYING REGULATIONS. THE OCC FOUND THE BRANCHES' BSA COMPLIANCE PROGRAM HAD DEFICIENCIES, DATING BACK TO JUNE 2016, IN THE BRANCHES' INTERNAL CONTROLS, SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY MONITORING, FOREIGN CORRESPONDENT DUE DILIGENCE PROGRAM, TRADE FINANCE MONITORING,INDEPENDENT AUDIT, AND BSA OFFICER STAFFING FUNCTIONS. THESE FINDINGS CITED VIOLATION OF THE STATUTORY AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS TO MAINTAIN AN ADEQUATE BSA COMPLIANCE PROGRAM, FILE SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY REPORTS, AND CONDUCT APPROPRIATE DUE DILIGENCE ON FOREIGN CORRESPONDENT ACCOUNTS. THE ORDER REQUIRES THE BRANCHES TO TAKE COMPREHENSIVE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TO IMPROVE THEIR BSA/AML COMPLIANCE PROGRAM. THE BRANCHES CONTINUE TO OPERATE UNDER AN OCC CONSENT ORDER, ISSUED IN NOVEMBER 2017,REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TO IMPROVE THEIR OFAC COMPLIANCE PROGRAM AND HAVE BEGUN CORRECTIVE ACTIONS AND ARE COMMITTED TO REMEDYING THE DEFICIENCIES IDENTIFIED BY THE OCC AND ENHANCING THEIR BSA/AML COMPLIANCE PROGRAM.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
THE OCC ISSUED ON FEBRUARY 22, 2019 A CEASE AND DESIST ORDER AGAINST THE NEW YORK (PRIMARY), CHICAGO,AND LOS ANGELES FEDERAL BRANCHES OF THE FIRM'S AFFILIATE, MUFG BANK, LTD., TOKYO, JAPAN, FOR VIOLATING THEBANK SECRECY ACT (BSA) AND ITS UNDERLYING REGULATIONS. THE OCC FOUND THE BRANCHES' BSA COMPLIANCEPROGRAM HAD DEFICIENCIES, DATING BACK TO JUNE 2016, IN THE BRANCHES' INTERNAL CONTROLS, SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY MONITORING, FOREIGN CORRESPONDENT DUE DILIGENCE PROGRAM, TRADE FINANCE MONITORING,INDEPENDENT AUDIT AND BSA OFFICER STAFFING FUNCTIONS. THESE FINDINGS CITED VIOLATION OF THE STATUTORY AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS TO MAINTAIN AN ADEQUATE BSA COMPLIANCE PROGRAM, FILE SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY REPORTS, AND CONDUCT APPROPRIATE DUE DILIGENCE ON FOREIGN CORRESPONDENT ACCOUNTS. THE ORDER REQUIRES THE BRANCHES TO TAKE COMPREHENSIVE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TO IMPROVE THEIR BSA/AML COMPLIANCE PROGRAM. THE BRANCHES CONTINUE TO OPERATE UNDER AN OCC CONSENT ORDER, ISSUED IN NOVEMBER 2017,REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TO IMPROVE THEIR OFAC COMPLIANCE PROGRAM AND HAVE BEGUN CORRECTIVE ACTIONS AND ARE COMMITTED TO REMEDYING THE DEFICIENCIES IDENTIFIED BY THE OCC AND ENHANCING THEIR BSA/AML COMPLIANCE PROGRAM.
Sanction detail — filed text
THE OCC ISSUED THE ABOVE-REFERENCED CEASE AND DESIST ORDER AGAINST THE NEW YORK, CHICAGO, ANDLOS ANGELES BRANCHES OF MUFG BANK, LTD.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE CRD Number: This advisory affiliate is a Firm an Individual Registered: Yes No Name: MUFG BANK, LTD. (For individuals, Last, First, Middle) This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY (OCC) 2. Principal Sanction: Cease and Desist Other Sanctions: 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 02/22/2019 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: AA-EC-2019-7 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: No Product Other Product Types: 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): THE OCC ISSUED ON FEBRUARY 22, 2019 A CEASE AND DESIST ORDER AGAINST THE NEW YORK (PRIMARY), CHICAGO,AND LOS ANGELES FEDERAL BRANCHES OF THE FIRM'S AFFILIATE, MUFG BANK, LTD., TOKYO, JAPAN, FOR VIOLATING THEBANK SECRECY ACT (BSA) AND ITS UNDERLYING REGULATIONS. THE OCC FOUND THE BRANCHES' BSA COMPLIANCEPROGRAM HAD DEFICIENCIES, DATING BACK TO JUNE 2016, IN THE BRANCHES' INTERNAL CONTROLS, SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY MONITORING, FOREIGN CORRESPONDENT DUE DILIGENCE PROGRAM, TRADE FINANCE MONITORING,INDEPENDENT AUDIT AND BSA OFFICER STAFFING FUNCTIONS. THESE FINDINGS CITED VIOLATION OF THE STATUTORY AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS TO MAINTAIN AN ADEQUATE BSA COMPLIANCE PROGRAM, FILE SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY REPORTS, AND CONDUCT APPROPRIATE DUE DILIGENCE ON FOREIGN CORRESPONDENT ACCOUNTS. THE ORDER REQUIRES THE BRANCHES TO TAKE COMPREHENSIVE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TO IMPROVE THEIR BSA/AML COMPLIANCE PROGRAM. THE BRANCHES CONTINUE TO OPERATE UNDER AN OCC CONSENT ORDER, ISSUED IN NOVEMBER 2017,REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TO IMPROVE THEIR OFAC COMPLIANCE PROGRAM AND HAVE BEGUN CORRECTIVE ACTIONS AND ARE COMMITTED TO REMEDYING THE DEFICIENCIES IDENTIFIED BY THE OCC AND ENHANCING THEIR BSA/AML COMPLIANCE PROGRAM. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Order 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 02/22/2019 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: THE OCC ISSUED THE ABOVE-REFERENCED CEASE AND DESIST ORDER AGAINST THE NEW YORK, CHICAGO, ANDLOS ANGELES BRANCHES OF MUFG BANK, LTD. 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). THE OCC ISSUED ON FEBRUARY 22, 2019 A CEASE AND DESIST ORDER AGAINST THE NEW YORK (PRIMARY), CHICAGO,AND LOS ANGELES FEDERAL BRANCHES OF THE FIRM'S AFFILIATE, MUFG BANK, LTD., TOKYO, JAPAN, FOR VIOLATING THEBANK SECRECY ACT (BSA) AND ITS UNDERLYING REGULATIONS. THE OCC FOUND THE BRANCHES' BSA COMPLIANCE PROGRAM HAD DEFICIENCIES, DATING BACK TO JUNE 2016, IN THE BRANCHES' INTERNAL CONTROLS, SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY MONITORING, FOREIGN CORRESPONDENT DUE DILIGENCE PROGRAM, TRADE FINANCE MONITORING,INDEPENDENT AUDIT, AND BSA OFFICER STAFFING FUNCTIONS. THESE FINDINGS CITED VIOLATION OF THE STATUTORY AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS TO MAINTAIN AN ADEQUATE BSA COMPLIANCE PROGRAM, FILE SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY REPORTS, AND CONDUCT APPROPRIATE DUE DILIGENCE ON FOREIGN CORRESPONDENT ACCOUNTS. THE ORDER REQUIRES THE BRANCHES TO TAKE COMPREHENSIVE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TO IMPROVE THEIR BSA/AML COMPLIANCE PROGRAM. THE BRANCHES CONTINUE TO OPERATE UNDER AN OCC CONSENT ORDER, ISSUED IN NOVEMBER 2017,REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TO IMPROVE THEIR OFAC COMPLIANCE PROGRAM AND HAVE BEGUN CORRECTIVE ACTIONS AND ARE COMMITTED TO REMEDYING THE DEFICIENCIES IDENTIFIED BY THE OCC AND ENHANCING THEIR BSA/AML COMPLIANCE PROGRAM.
Show 1 more source blocks
civil judicial · block 1PDF pages 63–65
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Item 11.H. of Part
1A or Item 2.F. of Part 1B of Form ADV.
Civil Judicial
Check Part 1A item(s) being responded to:
11.H(1)(a)
11.H(1)(b)
11.H(1)(c)
11.H(2)
Check Part 1B item(s) being responded to:
2.F(1)
2.F(2)
2.F(3)
2.F(4)
2.F(5)
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page.
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Item 11.H. of Part 1A or Item 2.F. of Part 1B. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. Unrelated civil judicial actions must be reported on separate DRPs.
PART I
A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name).
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
MUFG BANK, LTD.
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.H.
(1)(a), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances:
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
Yes
No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1. Court Action initiated by: (Name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, SRO, commodities exchange, agency, firm, private plaintiff, etc.)
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES
2.
Principal Relief Sought:
Other
Other Relief Sought:
SEE DETAILS BELOW
3.
Filing Date of Court Action (MM/DD/YYYY):
11/08/2017
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types:
5.
Formal Action was brought in (include name of Federal, State or Foreign Court, Location of Court - City or County and State or Country, Docket/Case
Number):
U.S. DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOCKET NO.: 1:17-CV-08691
6.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the civil judicial action (if applicable):
7.
Describe the allegations related to this civil action (your response must fit within the space provided):
FOLLOWING AFFILIATE MUFG BANK'S CONVERSION OF ITS STATE BANKING LICENSES ISSUED BY THE NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL
SERVICES ("DFS") TO FEDERAL BANKING LICENSES ISSUED BY THE OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY IN NOVEMBER 2017, DFS ISSUED
AN ORDER ASSERTING CONTINUING REGULATORY AUTHORITY OVER THE BANK. MUFG BANK THUS FILED THE LAWSUIT SEEKING A DECLARATION THAT
DFS DID NOT HAVE CONTINUING AUTHORITY OVER IT. IN RESPONSE, DFS FILED COUNTER CLAIMS AGAINST MUFG BANK UNDER BANKING AND RELATED
LAWS.
8.
Current Status?
Pending
On Appeal
Final
9.
If on appeal, action appealed to (provide name of court) and Date Appeal Filed (MM/DD/YYYY):
10. If pending, date notice/process was served (MM/DD/YYYY):
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 14 only.
11. How was matter resolved:
Settled
12. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
06/24/2019
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
13. Resolution Detail:
A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered or Relief Granted(check appropriate items)?
Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 33,000,000.00
Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
Disgorgement/Restitution
Censure
Cease and Desist/Injunction
Bar
Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions:
UNDER THE TERMS OF THE SETTLEMENT, MUFG BANK AND DFS RELEASED ALL OF THEIR CLAIMS AGAINST EACHOTHER, DFS AGREED NOT TO
CHALLENGE THE VALIDITY OF THE OCC LICENSES, AND MUFG AGREED TO MAKE THE$33 MILLION SETTLEMENT PAYMENT
C.
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement, or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived:
NOTE THIS SETTLEMENT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A REGULATORY ORDER OR INVOLVE A MONETARY PENALTY ORFINE.
14. Provide a brief summary of circumstances related to the action(s), allegation(s), disposition(s) and/or finding(s) disclosed above (your response must
fit within the space provided).
ON JUNE 24, 2019, MUFG BANK REACHED A SETTLEMENT WITH DFS TO RESOLVE ITS CIVIL LITIGATION AGAINST THE DFSIN U.S. DISTRICT COURT,
WHICH WAS ORIGINALLY FILED IN NOVEMBER 2017. DETAILS REGARDING MUFG BANK'SCOMPLAINT, DFS'S COUNTERCLAIM, AND THE SETTLEMENT ARE
INCLUDED ABOVE.* Metrics are based on the latest available data, including Form ADV filings, brochures, and relationship summaries pulled from the SEC IAPD, and may be subject to change. Learn what is included in the Rialytix data. Please refer to the firm's official disclosures for the most accurate information using their CRD number. This is not investment advice.