Firm profile

Kotak Mahindra Asset Management (Singapore) Pte. Ltd..

SINGAPORE, SingaporeCRD 286032Registration Status: ApprovedEffective since January 27, 2017SEC # 801-108865Latest ADV June 30, 2026

Kotak Mahindra Asset Management (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. is an SEC registered investment adviser organized as a corporation with a primary office location in Singapore, Singapore.

Assets Under Management
$4.7B
Employees
9
Offices
1 office
Total Clients
10

Associated firm names

1 name listed
  • KOTAK MAHINDRA ASSET MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.

Leadership

4 roles identified
CEONitin T. Jain
CCOHarsh M. Mehta
CFOPrasad Gokhale

Advisory services offered

3 types reported
Portfolio management for businesses
Portfolio management for investment companies
Portfolio management for pooled investment vehicles

Fee models offered

2 types reported
Asset based fees
Performance-based fees

Offices & Contact

Primary office

SINGAPORE, Singapore

Loading map…

Primary office regionOther reported regions

Shading shows states and countries with reported offices. Cities are listed below; shading does not indicate service coverage.

Singapore

SINGAPOREPrimary office

1 office records listed · 1 total offices reported. Counts can use different reporting dates. SEC filers may list only their largest 25 additional offices.

Contact and digital presence

ADV profile links

Regulatory Assets Under Management Breakdown

Total regulatory assets under management$4.7Bas of June 30, 2026
Discretionary100.0%
$4.7B
100% of total RAUM100.0%
Non-discretionary0.0%
$0
0% of total RAUM0.0%
All regulatory assets under management are discretionary.

Client Coverage Demographics

Top client segmentPooled Investment Vehicles represent 90.0% of total clients.
Top client categories% of clientsClients
1
Pooled Investment Vehicles
90.0%
9
2
Investment Cos.
10.0%
1
Categories with <5 clients
Corporations or other businesses not listed above<5 clients
Other investment advisers<5 clients
Other categories<5 clients

Assets under management Growth by Quarter

Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.

Total AUM$4.7B
Total Accounts15
10Y AUM Change+$4.7B

Private Funds

Private funds reported by Kotak Mahindra Asset Management (Singapore) Pte. Ltd..

Loading private fund disclosures…

Employee Growth by Quarter

Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.

Total Employees9
Clients per Employee1:1
10Y Employee Change+7 (+350.0%)

Historical AUM and employee figures reflect available SEC Form ADV filings under this CRD. Filing gaps may reflect registration status changes, dormant periods, state registration periods, firm restructuring, or other reporting changes. Rialytix does not interpolate missing periods.


Ownership

Reported direct and indirect ownership ranges

Each range applies to a separate reported relationship and should not be added together.

Reported ownership ranges

Highlighted bands show the percentage range reported in Form ADV.

0%25%50%75%100%
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITEDDirect owner · Schedule AInterest in KOTAK MAHINDRA ASSET MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.
75%+
UDAY SURESH KOTAKIndirect owner · Schedule BInterest in KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED
25% to < 50%

Bars represent the reported range at that individual ownership step, not an estimated percentage of the advisory firm. Indirect relationships may refer to intermediate entities rather than directly to Kotak Mahindra Asset Management (Singapore) Pte. Ltd...

Reported ownership and control details

Form ADV · Filing date 2026-06-30 · Schedules A and B

9 entries
#Owner / person & roleInterest in entityReported interestControl personTitle / status acquiredSource
1KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITEDSHAREHOLDERForeign entityKOTAK MAHINDRA ASSET MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.75% or moreCode EYesSHAREHOLDER03/2014Schedule APDF page 62
2Nitin Tejpal JainCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND EXECUTIVE DIRECTORIndividualKOTAK MAHINDRA ASSET MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.Less than 5%Code NAYesCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR03/2014Schedule APDF page 62
3HARSH MAHESH MEHTACHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICERIndividualKOTAK MAHINDRA ASSET MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.Less than 5%Code NAYesCHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER11/2024Schedule APDF page 62
4PRASAD GOKHALECHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERIndividualKOTAK MAHINDRA ASSET MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.Less than 5%Code NANoCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER08/2024Schedule APDF page 62
5shyam Kumar SyamasundaranDIRECTORIndividualKOTAK MAHINDRA ASSET MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.Less than 5%Code NANoDIRECTOR12/2018Schedule APDF page 62
6NILESH DHIRAJLAL SHAHDIRECTORIndividualKOTAK MAHINDRA ASSET MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.Less than 5%Code NANoDIRECTOR12/2018Schedule APDF page 62
7Krishnan Ramchandran No last nameDIRECTORIndividualKOTAK MAHINDRA ASSET MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.Less than 5%Code NANoDIRECTOR05/2025Schedule APDF page 62
8KAVIN SHAHCHIEF OPERATING OFFICERIndividualKOTAK MAHINDRA ASSET MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.Less than 5%Code NANoCHIEF OPERATING OFFICER08/2024Schedule APDF page 62
9UDAY SURESH KOTAKSHAREHOLDERIndividualKOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED25% to less than 50%Code CYesSHAREHOLDER11/1985Schedule BPDF page 63

Less than 5% may include zero. Code F identifies a role without specifying a percentage. Reported interests may overlap and may not include every owner. Total indirect ownership is not calculated.

Compliance & Disclosures

Filing dated 6/30/2026 7:57:16 AM

Responses were selected by the RIA in its filing. Questions are shortened for readability; “you” refers to the reporting firm, and some questions also cover advisory affiliates.

RIA or supervised-person involvementThe RIA reported that none of the events below involve the firm or its supervised persons.RIA responseNo
AFelonies2 No

In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:

  • A1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a felony?No
  • A2Been charged with a felony?No
BMisdemeanors2 No

In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:

  • B1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a misdemeanor involving investments, an investment-related business, fraud, false statements or omissions, wrongful taking of property, bribery, perjury, forgery, counterfeiting, or extortion?No
  • B2Been charged with a misdemeanor of the kind listed above?No
CSEC or CFTC actions5 No

Has the SEC or CFTC ever:

  • C1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
  • C2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated SEC or CFTC regulations or statutes?No
  • C3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
  • C4Entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
  • C5Imposed a civil money penalty on you or an advisory affiliate, or ordered you or an advisory affiliate to cease and desist from any activity?No
DOther regulatory actions3 Yes2 No

Has any other federal regulatory agency, state regulatory agency, or foreign financial regulatory authority ever:

  • D1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission, or was dishonest, unfair, or unethical?No
  • D2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related regulations or statutes?Yes
  • D3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
  • D4In the past ten years, entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?Yes
  • D5Denied, suspended, or revoked your or an advisory affiliate’s registration or license, or otherwise prevented association with an investment-related business or restricted activities?Yes
ESelf-regulatory organization actions4 No

Has a self-regulatory organization or commodities exchange ever:

  • E1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
  • E2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated its rules, other than a violation designated as a minor rule violation under an SEC-approved plan?No
  • E3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
  • E4Disciplined you or an advisory affiliate by expulsion, suspension, barring association with other members, or otherwise restricting activities?No
FProfessional authorizations1 No
  • FHas an authorization to act as an attorney, accountant, or federal contractor granted to you or an advisory affiliate ever been revoked or suspended?No
GPending regulatory proceedings1 No
  • GAre you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a regulatory proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of C, D, or E?No
HCivil judicial actions and proceedings4 No

(1) Court actions

Has a domestic or foreign court:

  • H(1)(a)In the past ten years, enjoined you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
  • H(1)(b)Found that you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related statutes or regulations?No
  • H(1)(c)Dismissed, pursuant to a settlement agreement, an investment-related civil action brought against you or an advisory affiliate by a state or foreign financial regulatory authority?No

(2) Pending civil proceedings

  • H(2)Are you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a civil proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of H(1)?No
Additional DRP filings 11 source blocks

Verbatim excerpts from supporting DRP filings, which may concern the firm or advisory affiliates. Amounts retain their filed labels; no total or attribution is inferred.

regulatory · block 1KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITEDPDF pages 63–65
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED
Regulator name — filed text
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 8,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Settled

Action status / disposition — filed text

KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED'S ("KMBL") TREASURY FUNCTION HAD UNDERTAKEN A SUBSIDIARY GENERAL LEDGER ("SGL") BORROWING TRANSACTION IN BASKET REPO IN 182 DAY TREASURY BILLS FOR INR.200.78 CRORES (ABOUT $33 MILLION) ON APRIL 13, 2016. HOWEVER THERE WAS AN ERROR BY KMBL'S TREASURY IN COMPUTING THE AVAILABLE SECURITIES BALANCE RESULTING IN A SHORTFALL OF SECURITIES OF INR.91.42 CRORES (ABOUT $15 MILLION) IN THE SGL ACCOUNT OF KMBL WITH THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA. AFTER CONSIDERING KMBL'S EXPLANATION, RBI IMPOSED A PENALTY OF INR 5 LAKH (ABOUT $8000) ON KMBL FOR THE SAID SGL BOUNCE.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA ALLEGED THAT IN RELATION TO A SECURITIES GENERAL LEDGER ("SGL") TRANSACTION IN BASKET REPO IN 182 DAY TREASURY BILLS CARRIED OUT BY KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED'S TREASURY DEPARTMENT, THERE WAS A SHORTAGE OF SECURITIES TO THE TUNE OF RS.91.42 CRORE (ABOUT US$ 15 MILLION.)

Sanction detail — filed text

A FINE OF INR 0.5 MILLION EQUIVALENT TO ABOUT $8,000 WAS LEVIED BY RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND PAID IN FULL.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):

You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK
LIMITED
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
04/21/2016
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Debt - Government
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA ALLEGED THAT IN RELATION TO A SECURITIES GENERAL LEDGER ("SGL") TRANSACTION IN BASKET REPO IN 182 DAY
TREASURY BILLS CARRIED OUT BY KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED'S TREASURY DEPARTMENT, THERE WAS A SHORTAGE OF SECURITIES TO THE TUNE
OF RS.91.42 CRORE (ABOUT US$ 15 MILLION.)
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final

9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Settled
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
05/12/2016
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 8,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
A FINE OF INR 0.5 MILLION EQUIVALENT TO ABOUT $8,000 WAS LEVIED BY RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND PAID IN FULL.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED'S ("KMBL") TREASURY FUNCTION HAD UNDERTAKEN A SUBSIDIARY GENERAL LEDGER ("SGL") BORROWING
TRANSACTION IN BASKET REPO IN 182 DAY TREASURY BILLS FOR INR.200.78 CRORES (ABOUT $33 MILLION) ON APRIL 13, 2016. HOWEVER THERE WAS
AN ERROR BY KMBL'S TREASURY IN COMPUTING THE AVAILABLE SECURITIES BALANCE RESULTING IN A SHORTFALL OF SECURITIES OF INR.91.42
CRORES (ABOUT $15 MILLION) IN THE SGL ACCOUNT OF KMBL WITH THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA. AFTER CONSIDERING KMBL'S EXPLANATION, RBI
IMPOSED A PENALTY OF INR 5 LAKH (ABOUT $8000) ON KMBL FOR THE SAID SGL BOUNCE.
regulatory · block 2KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITEDPDF pages 65–67
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED
Regulator name — filed text
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 155.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Settled

Action status / disposition — filed text

IMPORTERS/EXPORTERS WHO WISH TO NET OFF THEIR RECEIVABLES/PAYABLES WITH THEIR OVERSEAS COUNTERPARTIES, NEED TO OBTAIN RBI APPROVAL FOR SUCH NETTING. RBI GRANTED APPROVAL FOR NETTING OFF TRANSACTION SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREIN, WHICH INTER-ALIA INCLUDED A CONDITION THAT KMBL SHOULD REPORT THE TRANSACTIONS ON GROSS BASIS IN RELEVANT RETURNS HOWEVER KMBL REPORTED THE TRANSACTION ON NET BASIS INSTEAD OF GROSS BASIS. HAVING EXAMINED THE MATTER, RBI IMPOSED A PENALTY ON KMBL OF INR 10000 (ABOUT USD 155) FOR THE ERROR IN REPORTING .
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA (RBI) ALLEGED THAT KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED IN REPORTED A FOREIGN EXCHANGE TRANSACTION ON NET BASIS INSTEAD OF GROSS BASIS, AS REQUIRED BY RBI.

Sanction detail — filed text

RBI IMPOSED A PENALTY OF INR.10000/- (ABOUT USD 155) ON KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED WHICH WAS PAID VIDE CHEQUE ON 21ST APRIL 2017.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE

CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK
LIMITED
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
02/08/2017
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Banking Products (Other than CD(s))
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA (RBI) ALLEGED THAT KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED IN REPORTED A FOREIGN EXCHANGE TRANSACTION ON NET BASIS
INSTEAD OF GROSS BASIS, AS REQUIRED BY RBI.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Settled
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
04/21/2017
 Exact
 Explanation

If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 155.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
RBI IMPOSED A PENALTY OF INR.10000/- (ABOUT USD 155) ON KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED WHICH WAS PAID VIDE CHEQUE ON 21ST APRIL
2017.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
IMPORTERS/EXPORTERS WHO WISH TO NET OFF THEIR RECEIVABLES/PAYABLES WITH THEIR OVERSEAS COUNTERPARTIES, NEED TO OBTAIN RBI
APPROVAL FOR SUCH NETTING. RBI GRANTED APPROVAL FOR NETTING OFF TRANSACTION SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREIN, WHICH
INTER-ALIA INCLUDED A CONDITION THAT KMBL SHOULD REPORT THE TRANSACTIONS ON GROSS BASIS IN RELEVANT RETURNS HOWEVER KMBL
REPORTED THE TRANSACTION ON NET BASIS INSTEAD OF GROSS BASIS. HAVING EXAMINED THE MATTER, RBI IMPOSED A PENALTY ON KMBL OF INR
10000 (ABOUT USD 155) FOR THE ERROR IN REPORTING .
regulatory · block 3KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITEDPDF pages 67–69
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED
Regulator name — filed text
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 1,549.90
How was matter resolved — filed text
Settled

Action status / disposition — filed text

IRDA HAD NOTED THAT EXIDE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY HAD PAID INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITY CHARGES TO THE ING VYSYA BANK (WHICH MERGED WITH KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED ON 1 APRIL 2015) DURING 2013-14 AND IRDA FOUND THAT IT IS IN VIOLATION OF CLAUSE 21 OF THE GUIDELINES ON LICENSING OF CORPORATE AGENTS (DATED 14.7.2015) AND SECTION 40 OF INSURANCE ACT 1938 AS THE AMOUNT PAID HAD EXCEEDED THE LIMIT OF EXPENDITURE ON COMMISSION STIPULATED UNDER SEC 40 A OF THE INSURANCE ACT. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED HAD REPRESENTED THAT THE BANK HAD NEVER VIOLATED THE PROVISIONS OF ACT NOR ANY ADVERSE REMARKS WERE IDENTIFIED BY IRDA DURING THE INSPECTION OF THE AGENCY OF THE BANK AND SINCE THIS CASE PERTAINED TO PAYMENTS MADE PRIOR TO THE MERGER OF ING VYSYA BANK WITH KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED, THE BANK MAY NOT BE PENALISED. HOWEVER IRDA MAINTAINED THAT IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE ACT AND HENCE NEED TO BE DEALT ACCORDINGLY AND LEVIED A FINE OF INR 0.1 MILLION.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

THE INSURANCE REGULATORY AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (IRDA) OF INDIA HAD NOTED THAT EXIDE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY HAD PAID INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITY CHARGES TO THE ING VYSYA BANK (WHICH MERGED WITH KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED ON APRIL, 1 2015) DURING 2013-14 AND IRDA FOUND THAT IT IS IN VIOLATION OF CLAUSE 21 OF THE GUIDELINES ON LICENSING OF CORPORATE AGENTS (DATED 14.7.2015) AND SECTION 40 OF INSURANCE ACT 1938 AS THE AMOUNT PAID HAD EXCEEDED THE LIMIT OF EXPENDITURE ON COMMISSION STIPULATED UNDER SEC 40 A OF THE INSURANCE ACT.

Sanction detail — filed text

A FINE OF INDIAN RUPEES 0.1 MILLION EQUIVALENT TO USD 1549.90 WAS LEVIED BY RESERVE BANK OF INDIA PAID IN FULL (USD/INR RATE USED 64.52 AS AT 19TH FEBRUARY 2018)
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK
LIMITED
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.

This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
02/19/2018
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Insurance
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE INSURANCE REGULATORY AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (IRDA) OF INDIA HAD NOTED THAT EXIDE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY HAD PAID
INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITY CHARGES TO THE ING VYSYA BANK (WHICH MERGED WITH KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED ON APRIL, 1 2015) DURING
2013-14 AND IRDA FOUND THAT IT IS IN VIOLATION OF CLAUSE 21 OF THE GUIDELINES ON LICENSING OF CORPORATE AGENTS (DATED 14.7.2015)
AND SECTION 40 OF INSURANCE ACT 1938 AS THE AMOUNT PAID HAD EXCEEDED THE LIMIT OF EXPENDITURE ON COMMISSION STIPULATED UNDER
SEC 40 A OF THE INSURANCE ACT.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Settled
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
03/05/2018
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 1,549.90
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution

 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
A FINE OF INDIAN RUPEES 0.1 MILLION EQUIVALENT TO USD 1549.90 WAS LEVIED BY RESERVE BANK OF INDIA PAID IN FULL (USD/INR RATE
USED 64.52 AS AT 19TH FEBRUARY 2018)
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
IRDA HAD NOTED THAT EXIDE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY HAD PAID INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITY CHARGES TO THE ING VYSYA BANK (WHICH MERGED
WITH KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED ON 1 APRIL 2015) DURING 2013-14 AND IRDA FOUND THAT IT IS IN VIOLATION OF CLAUSE 21 OF THE
GUIDELINES ON LICENSING OF CORPORATE AGENTS (DATED 14.7.2015) AND SECTION 40 OF INSURANCE ACT 1938 AS THE AMOUNT PAID HAD
EXCEEDED THE LIMIT OF EXPENDITURE ON COMMISSION STIPULATED UNDER SEC 40 A OF THE INSURANCE ACT. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED HAD
REPRESENTED THAT THE BANK HAD NEVER VIOLATED THE PROVISIONS OF ACT NOR ANY ADVERSE REMARKS WERE IDENTIFIED BY IRDA DURING THE
INSPECTION OF THE AGENCY OF THE BANK AND SINCE THIS CASE PERTAINED TO PAYMENTS MADE PRIOR TO THE MERGER OF ING VYSYA BANK WITH
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED, THE BANK MAY NOT BE PENALISED. HOWEVER IRDA MAINTAINED THAT IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE ACT AND HENCE
NEED TO BE DEALT ACCORDINGLY AND LEVIED A FINE OF INR 0.1 MILLION.
regulatory · block 4KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITEDPDF pages 69–71
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED
Regulator name — filed text
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 27,898.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Settled

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE RBI HAD IMPOSED A PENALTY OF INR20 LAKH ( INR 2 MILLION) ON KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD IN FEBRUARY 2019 FOR KYC DEFICIENCIES FOUND IN OPENING ONE SAVINGS ACCOUNT OPENED IN THE YEAR 2010. THIS WAS A CASE OF FAILURE OF THE PERSONNEL IN MEETING THE CUSTOMER BEFORE OPENING THE ACCOUNT. AS PER THE BANK'S PROCESSES IT IS MANDATORY TO MEET THE CUSTOMER BEFORE ON-BOARDING THE CUSTOMER. IN THE CITED CASE, BRANCH PERSONNEL HAD VISITED THE HOUSE OF THE CUSTOMER BUT DID NOT MEET THE CUSTOMER AND HAD CERTIFIED THAT THEY MET THE CUSTOMER. ACTION HAS ALREADY BEEN TAKEN ON THE ERRANT EMPLOYEE AND THE PROCESS HAS BEEN REITERATED FOR STRICTER COMPLIANCE.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA (RBI) HAD IMPOSED A PENALTY OF INR 20 LAKH (INR 2 MILLION) ON KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED IN FEBRUARY 2019 FOR KNOW YOUR CUSTOMER (KYC) DEFICIENCIES FOUND IN OPENING ONE SAVINGS ACCOUNT OPENED IN THE YEAR 2010.

Sanction detail — filed text

A FINE OF INR 2 MILLION EQUIVALENT TO USD 27898 WAS LEVIED BY THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA WHICH WAS PAID IN FULL. (USD/INR RATE USED 71.69 AS AT 4TH FEBRUARY 2019)
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK
LIMITED
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.

If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
02/04/2019
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other
Other Product Types: 
KYC
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA (RBI) HAD IMPOSED A PENALTY OF INR 20 LAKH (INR 2 MILLION) ON KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED IN FEBRUARY 2019
FOR KNOW YOUR CUSTOMER (KYC) DEFICIENCIES FOUND IN OPENING ONE SAVINGS ACCOUNT OPENED IN THE YEAR 2010.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Settled
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
02/14/2019
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 27,898.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,

Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
A FINE OF INR 2 MILLION EQUIVALENT TO USD 27898 WAS LEVIED BY THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA WHICH WAS PAID IN FULL. (USD/INR RATE
USED 71.69 AS AT 4TH FEBRUARY 2019)
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE RBI HAD IMPOSED A PENALTY OF INR20 LAKH ( INR 2 MILLION) ON KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD IN FEBRUARY 2019 FOR KYC DEFICIENCIES FOUND
IN OPENING ONE SAVINGS ACCOUNT OPENED IN THE YEAR 2010. THIS WAS A CASE OF FAILURE OF THE PERSONNEL IN MEETING THE CUSTOMER
BEFORE OPENING THE ACCOUNT. AS PER THE BANK'S PROCESSES IT IS MANDATORY TO MEET THE CUSTOMER BEFORE ON-BOARDING THE CUSTOMER.
IN THE CITED CASE, BRANCH PERSONNEL HAD VISITED THE HOUSE OF THE CUSTOMER BUT DID NOT MEET THE CUSTOMER AND HAD CERTIFIED THAT
THEY MET THE CUSTOMER. ACTION HAS ALREADY BEEN TAKEN ON THE ERRANT EMPLOYEE AND THE PROCESS HAS BEEN REITERATED FOR STRICTER
COMPLIANCE.
regulatory · block 5KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITEDPDF pages 71–73
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED
Regulator name — filed text
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA (RBI)
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 289,184.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Settled

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA (RBI) HAS, BY AN ORDER DATED JUNE 06, 2019, IMPOSED A MONETARY PENALTY OF RS 2 CRORES (RS 20 MILLION) ON KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED (THE BANK) FOR FAILURE TO FURNISH INFORMATION ABOUT DETAILS OF THE SHAREHOLDING HELD BY ITS PROMOTERS AND TO SUBMIT DETAILS OF THE PROPOSED COURSE OF ACTION/PLANS/STRATEGY OF THE BANK FOR COMPLYING WITH THE PERMITTED TIMELINE FOR DILUTION OF PROMOTER SHAREHOLDING.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA (RBI) HAS, BY AN ORDER DATED JUNE 06, 2019, IMPOSED A MONETARY PENALTY OF INR 2 CRORES (RS 20 MILLION) ON KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED (THE BANK) FOR FAILURE TO FURNISH INFORMATION ABOUT DETAILS OF THE SHAREHOLDING HELD BY ITS PROMOTERS AND TO SUBMIT DETAILS OF THE PROPOSED COURSE OF ACTION/PLANS/STRATEGY OF THE BANK FOR COMPLYING WITH THE PERMITTED TIMELINE FOR DILUTION OF PROMOTER SHAREHOLDING

Sanction detail — filed text

A FINE OF INDIAN RUPEES 20 MILLION EQUIVALENT TO USD 289184 WAS LEVIED BY RESERVE BANK OF INDIA PAID IN FULL (USD/INR RATE USED 69.16 AS AT 06TH JUNE 2019).
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK
LIMITED
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to

the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA (RBI)
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
06/06/2019
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other
Other Product Types: 
INFORMATION SUBMISSION
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA (RBI) HAS, BY AN ORDER DATED JUNE 06, 2019, IMPOSED A MONETARY PENALTY OF INR 2 CRORES (RS 20 MILLION) ON
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED (THE BANK) FOR FAILURE TO FURNISH INFORMATION ABOUT DETAILS OF THE SHAREHOLDING HELD BY ITS
PROMOTERS AND TO SUBMIT DETAILS OF THE PROPOSED COURSE OF ACTION/PLANS/STRATEGY OF THE BANK FOR COMPLYING WITH THE PERMITTED
TIMELINE FOR DILUTION OF PROMOTER SHAREHOLDING
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Settled
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
06/19/2019
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 289,184.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
A FINE OF INDIAN RUPEES 20 MILLION EQUIVALENT TO USD 289184 WAS LEVIED BY RESERVE BANK OF INDIA PAID IN FULL (USD/INR RATE USED
69.16 AS AT 06TH JUNE 2019).

13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA (RBI) HAS, BY AN ORDER DATED JUNE 06, 2019, IMPOSED A MONETARY PENALTY OF RS 2 CRORES (RS 20 MILLION) ON
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED (THE BANK) FOR FAILURE TO FURNISH INFORMATION ABOUT DETAILS OF THE SHAREHOLDING HELD BY ITS
PROMOTERS AND TO SUBMIT DETAILS OF THE PROPOSED COURSE OF ACTION/PLANS/STRATEGY OF THE BANK FOR COMPLYING WITH THE PERMITTED
TIMELINE FOR DILUTION OF PROMOTER SHAREHOLDING.
regulatory · block 6SHAH, NILESH, DHIRAJLALPDF pages 73–75
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
SHAH, NILESH, DHIRAJLAL
Regulator name — filed text
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (SEBI)

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE INDIVIDUAL IS A NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE FIRM. HE IS A MEMBER OF THE INVESTMENT COMMITTEE OF KOTAK MAHINDRA ASSET MANAGEMENT COMPANY LIMITED, INDIA ("KMAMC") AN AFFILIATE OF THE FIRM AND ALSO THE MANAGING DIRECTOR OF KMAMC. WITH RESPECT TO SOME FIXED MATURITY PLANS, KMAMC EXTENDED THEIR MATURITY DATE HOWEVER SEBI ALLEGED THAT THE FUNDS BEING FIXED MATURITY PLANS, ASSETS OF THE FUNDS SHOULD HAVE BEEN REDEEMED ON THE MATURITY DATE AND INVESTORS SHOULD HAVE BEEN PAID AND THE TENURE OF THE PLANS SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN EXTENDED, AS PER SEBI RULES. IN THIS REGARD SEBI ALLEGED THAT THE INDIVIDUAL FAILED TO ENSURE THAT: (I) THE FUNDS WERE FULLY REDEEMED AT THE END OF MATURITY PERIOD OR WERE ROLLED OVER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF MUTUAL FUND ("MF") REGULATIONS; (II) THE FUNDS WERE WOUND UP ON THE EXPIRY OF DURATION FIXED IN THE SCHEMES (III) DESPATCH OF REDEMPTION OR REPURCHASE PROCEEDS WITHIN 10 WORKING DAYS FROM THE DATE OF REDEMPTION, AND (IV) FAIR VALUATION OF THE FUNDS. SEBI ALSO OBSERVED THAT HE FAILED TO ENSURE KMAMC'S COMPLIANCE WITH PROVISIONS OF MF REGULATIONS. THE PENALTY LEVIED ON THE INDIVIDUAL WAS INR3 MILLION (APPROX. USD 38000). THE INDIVIDUAL HAS APPEALED TO THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, INDIA ("SAT"). THE SAT BY ITS ORDER DATED AUGUST 24, 2022 DIRECTED SEBI NOT TO INITIATE ANY RECOVERY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE APPELLANTS. HEARINGS FOR THE MATTER WHICH WAS PENDING WITH SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (SAT) HAS BEEN CONCLUDED. SAT, VIDE ITS ORDER DATED MARCH 6, 2026, HAS GRANTED RELIEF IN RESPECT OF THE DIRECTION RELATING TO DISGORGEMENT OF INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT FEES, WHILE UPHOLDING THE SEBI ORDER ON PENALTIES. AN APPEAL HAD BEEN FILED BEFORE THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT, AND ARGUMENTS HAVE BEEN CONCLUDED AND AS ON JUNE 29, 2026, THE JUDGMENT HAS BEEN RESERVED.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

THE INDIVIDUAL IS A NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE FIRM. HE IS A MEMBER OF THE INVESTMENT COMMITTEE OF KOTAK MAHINDRA ASSET MANAGEMENT COMPANY LIMITED, INDIA ("KMAMC") AN AFFILIATE OF THE FIRM AND ALSO MANAGING DIRECTOR OF KMAMC. THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ALLEGED THAT THE INDIVIDUAL FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN OBLIGATIONS (AS EXPLAINED BELOW UNDER ITEM 13). THE PENALTY LEVIED ON THE INDIVIDUAL WAS INR3 MILLION (APPROX. USD 38000).

Sanction detail — filed text

THE PENALTY LEVIED ON THE INDIVIDUAL WAS INR3 MILLION (APPROX. USD 38000) . THE INDIVIDUAL HAS APPEALED TO THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, INDIA ("SAT"). THE SAT BY ITS ORDER DATED AUGUST 24, 2022 DIRECTED SEBI NOT TO INITIATE ANY RECOVERY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE APPELLANTS. HEARINGS FOR THE MATTER WHICH WAS PENDING WITH SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (SAT) HAS BEEN CONCLUDED. SAT, VIDE ITS ORDER DATED MARCH 6, 2026, HAS GRANTED RELIEF IN RESPECT OF THE DIRECTION RELATING TO DISGORGEMENT OF INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT FEES, WHILE UPHOLDING THE SEBI ORDER ON PENALTIES. AN APPEAL HAD BEEN FILED BEFORE THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT, AND ARGUMENTS HAVE BEEN CONCLUDED AND AS ON JUNE 29, 2026, THE JUDGMENT HAS BEEN RESERVED.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
7146706
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
SHAH, NILESH, DHIRAJLAL
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign

(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (SEBI)
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
06/30/2022
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
KOTAK MAHINDRA ASSET MANAGEMENT COMPANY LIMITED ("KMAMC") - INDIA
6.
Principal Product Type:
Mutual Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE INDIVIDUAL IS A NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE FIRM. HE IS A MEMBER OF THE INVESTMENT COMMITTEE OF KOTAK MAHINDRA ASSET
MANAGEMENT COMPANY LIMITED, INDIA ("KMAMC") AN AFFILIATE OF THE FIRM AND ALSO MANAGING DIRECTOR OF KMAMC. THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ALLEGED THAT THE INDIVIDUAL FAILED TO ENSURE CERTAIN OBLIGATIONS (AS EXPLAINED BELOW UNDER ITEM 13). THE
PENALTY LEVIED ON THE INDIVIDUAL WAS INR3 MILLION (APPROX. USD 38000).
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
THE PENALTY LEVIED ON THE INDIVIDUAL WAS INR3 MILLION (APPROX. USD 38000) . THE INDIVIDUAL HAS APPEALED TO THE SECURITIES
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, INDIA ("SAT"). THE SAT BY ITS ORDER DATED AUGUST 24, 2022 DIRECTED SEBI NOT TO INITIATE ANY RECOVERY
PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE APPELLANTS. HEARINGS FOR THE MATTER WHICH WAS PENDING WITH SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (SAT) HAS
BEEN CONCLUDED. SAT, VIDE ITS ORDER DATED MARCH 6, 2026, HAS GRANTED RELIEF IN RESPECT OF THE DIRECTION RELATING TO
DISGORGEMENT OF INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT FEES, WHILE UPHOLDING THE SEBI ORDER ON PENALTIES. AN APPEAL HAD BEEN FILED BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT, AND ARGUMENTS HAVE BEEN CONCLUDED AND AS ON JUNE 29, 2026, THE JUDGMENT HAS BEEN RESERVED.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE INDIVIDUAL IS A NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE FIRM. HE IS A MEMBER OF THE INVESTMENT COMMITTEE OF KOTAK MAHINDRA ASSET
MANAGEMENT COMPANY LIMITED, INDIA ("KMAMC") AN AFFILIATE OF THE FIRM AND ALSO THE MANAGING DIRECTOR OF KMAMC. WITH RESPECT TO
SOME FIXED MATURITY PLANS, KMAMC EXTENDED THEIR MATURITY DATE HOWEVER SEBI ALLEGED THAT THE FUNDS BEING FIXED MATURITY PLANS,
ASSETS OF THE FUNDS SHOULD HAVE BEEN REDEEMED ON THE MATURITY DATE AND INVESTORS SHOULD HAVE BEEN PAID AND THE TENURE OF THE

PLANS SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN EXTENDED, AS PER SEBI RULES. IN THIS REGARD SEBI ALLEGED THAT THE INDIVIDUAL FAILED TO ENSURE THAT: (I)
THE FUNDS WERE FULLY REDEEMED AT THE END OF MATURITY PERIOD OR WERE ROLLED OVER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF MUTUAL
FUND ("MF") REGULATIONS; (II) THE FUNDS WERE WOUND UP ON THE EXPIRY OF DURATION FIXED IN THE SCHEMES (III) DESPATCH OF REDEMPTION
OR REPURCHASE PROCEEDS WITHIN 10 WORKING DAYS FROM THE DATE OF REDEMPTION, AND (IV) FAIR VALUATION OF THE FUNDS. SEBI ALSO
OBSERVED THAT HE FAILED TO ENSURE KMAMC'S COMPLIANCE WITH PROVISIONS OF MF REGULATIONS. THE PENALTY LEVIED ON THE INDIVIDUAL
WAS INR3 MILLION (APPROX. USD 38000). THE INDIVIDUAL HAS APPEALED TO THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, INDIA ("SAT"). THE SAT BY ITS
ORDER DATED AUGUST 24, 2022 DIRECTED SEBI NOT TO INITIATE ANY RECOVERY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE APPELLANTS. HEARINGS FOR THE
MATTER WHICH WAS PENDING WITH SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (SAT) HAS BEEN CONCLUDED. SAT, VIDE ITS ORDER DATED MARCH 6, 2026,
HAS GRANTED RELIEF IN RESPECT OF THE DIRECTION RELATING TO DISGORGEMENT OF INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT FEES, WHILE UPHOLDING THE SEBI
ORDER ON PENALTIES. AN APPEAL HAD BEEN FILED BEFORE THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT, AND ARGUMENTS HAVE BEEN CONCLUDED AND AS ON
JUNE 29, 2026, THE JUDGMENT HAS BEEN RESERVED.
Show 5 more source blocks
regulatory · block 7KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITEDPDF pages 75–77
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED
Regulator name — filed text
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 132,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Settled

Action status / disposition — filed text

RESERVE BANK OF INDIA HAD ON JULY 04, 2022 LEVIED A PENALTY OF INR10.5 MILLION ON KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED FOR THE FOLLOWING VIOLATIONS: 1. NON-COMPLIANCE WITH DIRECTIONS ON 'CUSTOMER PROTECTION - LIMITING LIABILITY OF CUSTOMERS IN UNAUTHORISED ELECTRONIC BANKING TRANSACTIONS - (PENALTY INR3 MILLION). 2. CONTRAVENTION OF THE PROVISIONS OF SUBSECTION (2) OF SECTION26A OF THE BANKING REGULATION ACT, 1949 READ WITH PARAGRAPH 3 OF THE DEPOSITOR EDUCATION AND AWARENESS FUND SCHEME' 2014 (PENALTY INR3 MILLION). 3. NON-COMPLIANCE WITH DIRECTIONS ON BANKS, EXPOSURE TO CAPITAL MARKETS - RATIONALIZATION OF NORMS' AND LOANS AND ADVANCES -STATUTORY AND OTHER (PENALTY INR4.5 MILLION). THE PENALTY AGGREGATES INR10.05 MILLLION (ABOUT US$132,000). THE PENALTY WAS SETTLED BY PAYMENT ON JULY 11, 2022.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

RESERVE BANK OF INDIA ALLEGED THE FOLLOWING: 1. NON-COMPLIANCE WITH DIRECTIONS ON 'CUSTOMER PROTECTION - LIMITING LIABILITY OF CUSTOMERS IN UNAUTHORISED ELECTRONIC BANKING TRANSACTIONS - (PENALTY INR3 MILLION). 2. CONTRAVENTION OF THE PROVISIONS OF SUBSECTION (2) OF SECTION26A OF THE BANKING REGULATION ACT, 1949 READ WITH PARAGRAPH 3 OF THE DEPOSITOR EDUCATION AND AWARENESS FUND SCHEME' 2014 (PENALTY INR3 MILLION). 3. NON-COMPLIANCE WITH DIRECTIONS ON BANKS, EXPOSURE TO CAPITAL MARKETS - RATIONALIZATION OF NORMS' AND LOANS AND ADVANCES -STATUTORY AND OTHER (PENALTY INR4.5 MILLION).

Sanction detail — filed text

A PENALTY OF INR10.5 MILLION WAS LEVIED AND PAID IN FULL ON JULY 11, 2022.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK
LIMITED
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No

NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
07/04/2022
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Other
Other Product Types: 
BANKING PRODUCTS
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA ALLEGED THE FOLLOWING: 1. NON-COMPLIANCE WITH DIRECTIONS ON 'CUSTOMER PROTECTION - LIMITING LIABILITY OF
CUSTOMERS IN UNAUTHORISED ELECTRONIC BANKING TRANSACTIONS - (PENALTY INR3 MILLION). 2. CONTRAVENTION OF THE PROVISIONS OF
SUBSECTION (2) OF SECTION26A OF THE BANKING REGULATION ACT, 1949 READ WITH PARAGRAPH 3 OF THE DEPOSITOR EDUCATION AND
AWARENESS FUND SCHEME' 2014 (PENALTY INR3 MILLION). 3. NON-COMPLIANCE WITH DIRECTIONS ON BANKS, EXPOSURE TO CAPITAL MARKETS -
RATIONALIZATION OF NORMS' AND LOANS AND ADVANCES -STATUTORY AND OTHER (PENALTY INR4.5 MILLION).
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Settled
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
07/11/2022
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 132,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
A PENALTY OF INR10.5 MILLION WAS LEVIED AND PAID IN FULL ON JULY 11, 2022.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA HAD ON JULY 04, 2022 LEVIED A PENALTY OF INR10.5 MILLION ON KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED FOR THE FOLLOWING

VIOLATIONS: 1. NON-COMPLIANCE WITH DIRECTIONS ON 'CUSTOMER PROTECTION - LIMITING LIABILITY OF CUSTOMERS IN UNAUTHORISED
ELECTRONIC BANKING TRANSACTIONS - (PENALTY INR3 MILLION). 2. CONTRAVENTION OF THE PROVISIONS OF SUBSECTION (2) OF SECTION26A OF
THE BANKING REGULATION ACT, 1949 READ WITH PARAGRAPH 3 OF THE DEPOSITOR EDUCATION AND AWARENESS FUND SCHEME' 2014 (PENALTY
INR3 MILLION). 3. NON-COMPLIANCE WITH DIRECTIONS ON BANKS, EXPOSURE TO CAPITAL MARKETS - RATIONALIZATION OF NORMS' AND LOANS AND
ADVANCES -STATUTORY AND OTHER (PENALTY INR4.5 MILLION). THE PENALTY AGGREGATES INR10.05 MILLLION (ABOUT US$132,000). THE PENALTY
WAS SETTLED BY PAYMENT ON JULY 11, 2022.
regulatory · block 8KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITEDPDF pages 77–78
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED
Regulator name — filed text
RESERVE BANK INDIA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 474,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Settled

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE PENALTY WAS SETTLED ON 30 OCTOBER 2023.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

RESERVE BANK OF INDIA (RBI) VIDE ITS LETTER DATED OCTOBER 17, 2023 LEVIED A PENALTY OF INR 3.95 CRORE (APPROX. USD 474000) ON THE BANK FOR NON-COMPLIANCE WITH RBI DIRECTIONS ON MANAGING RISKS AND CODE OF CONDUCT IN OUTSOURCING OF FINANCIAL SERVICES BY BANKS, RECOVERY AGENTS ENGAGED BY BANKS, CUSTOMER SERVICE IN BANKS AND LOANS AND ADVANCES - STATUTORY AND OTHER RESTRICTIONS FOR FOLLOWING: A.INR 1 CRORE (APPROX. USD 120000) FOR FAILURE TO CARRYOUT ANNUAL REVIEW / DUE DILIGENCE OF SERVICE PROVIDER B.INR 1 CRORE (APPROX. USD 120000) FOR FAILURE TO ENSURE THAT CUSTOMERS ARE NOT CONTACTED AFTER 7 PM AND BEFORE 7 AM C.INR 1 CRORE (APPROX. USD 120000) FOR LEVYING INTEREST FROM DISBURSEMENT DUE DATE /LOAN AGREEMENT AND NOT FROM THE ACTUAL DATE OF FIRST DISBURSEMENT OF THE LOAN CONTRARY TO THE TERMS & CONDITIONS OF SANCTION D.INR 95 LAKHS (APPROX. USD 114000) FOR CHARGING FORECLOSURE CHARGE DESPITE THERE BEING NO CLAUSE IN THE LOAN AGREEMENT FOR LEVY OF PREPAYMENT PENALTY ON LOANS RECALLED/FORECLOSURE INITIATED BY THE BANK.

Sanction detail — filed text

RESERVE BANK OF INDIA (RBI) VIDE ITS LETTER DATED OCTOBER 17, 2023 LEVIED A PENALTY OF INR 3.95 CRORE (APPROX. USD 474000) ON THE BANK WHICH WAS SETTLED ON 30 OCTOBER 2023.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK
LIMITED
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:

SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
RESERVE BANK INDIA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
10/17/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Banking Products (Other than CD(s))
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA (RBI) VIDE ITS LETTER DATED OCTOBER 17, 2023 LEVIED A PENALTY OF INR 3.95 CRORE (APPROX. USD 474000) ON THE
BANK FOR NON-COMPLIANCE WITH RBI DIRECTIONS ON MANAGING RISKS AND CODE OF CONDUCT IN OUTSOURCING OF FINANCIAL SERVICES BY
BANKS, RECOVERY AGENTS ENGAGED BY BANKS, CUSTOMER SERVICE IN BANKS AND LOANS AND ADVANCES - STATUTORY AND OTHER RESTRICTIONS
FOR FOLLOWING: A.INR 1 CRORE (APPROX. USD 120000) FOR FAILURE TO CARRYOUT ANNUAL REVIEW / DUE DILIGENCE OF SERVICE PROVIDER B.INR
1 CRORE (APPROX. USD 120000) FOR FAILURE TO ENSURE THAT CUSTOMERS ARE NOT CONTACTED AFTER 7 PM AND BEFORE 7 AM C.INR 1 CRORE
(APPROX. USD 120000) FOR LEVYING INTEREST FROM DISBURSEMENT DUE DATE /LOAN AGREEMENT AND NOT FROM THE ACTUAL DATE OF FIRST
DISBURSEMENT OF THE LOAN CONTRARY TO THE TERMS & CONDITIONS OF SANCTION D.INR 95 LAKHS (APPROX. USD 114000) FOR CHARGING
FORECLOSURE CHARGE DESPITE THERE BEING NO CLAUSE IN THE LOAN AGREEMENT FOR LEVY OF PREPAYMENT PENALTY ON LOANS
RECALLED/FORECLOSURE INITIATED BY THE BANK.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Settled
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
10/30/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 474,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA (RBI) VIDE ITS LETTER DATED OCTOBER 17, 2023 LEVIED A PENALTY OF INR 3.95 CRORE (APPROX. USD 474000) ON
THE BANK WHICH WAS SETTLED ON 30 OCTOBER 2023.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE PENALTY WAS SETTLED ON 30 OCTOBER 2023.
regulatory · block 9KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITEDPDF pages 79–80
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED
Regulator name — filed text
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
How was matter resolved — filed text
Settled

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE BANK HAD INITIATED REMEDIAL MEASURES TO ADDRESS THE SUPERVISORY CONCERNS AND SUBMITTED COMPLIANCES TO THE RESERVE BANK. THE BANK ALSO COMMISSIONED AN EXTERNAL AUDIT, WITH PRIOR APPROVAL OF RBI, TO VALIDATE THE COMPLIANCES. NOW, HAVING SATISFIED ITSELF BASED ON THE SUBMISSIONS, AND REMEDIAL MEASURES UNDERTAKEN BY THE BANK, THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, HAS DECIDED TO LIFT THE AFORE-MENTIONED RESTRICTIONS I.E. CEASE AND DESIST ORDER PLACED ON KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED ("BANK") IS THE PARENT OF THE FIRM. THE BANK RECEIVED AN ORDER DATED APRIL 24, 2024 FROM THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA ("RBI"), DIRECTING THE BANK TO CEASE AND DESIST, WITH IMMEDIATE EFFECT FROM (I) ONBOARDING NEW CUSTOMERS THROUGH THE BANK'S ONLINE AND MOBILE BANKING CHANNELS AND (II) ISSUING FRESH CREDIT CARDS. THE ORDER WAS BASED, INTER ALIA, ON THE DEFICIENCIES OBSERVED BY THE RBI IN THEIR IT EXAMINATION OF THE BANK.

Sanction detail — filed text

CEASE AND DESIST, WITH IMMEDIATE EFFECT (ORDER DATED 04/24/2024) FROM (I) ONBOARDING NEW CUSTOMERS THROUGH THE BANK'S ONLINE AND MOBILE BANKING CHANNELS AND (II) ISSUING FRESH CREDIT CARDS. THE ORDER SHALL BE REVIEWED BY RBI UPON SATISFACTORY REMEDIATION OF THE OBSERVATIONS MADE IN THEIR IT EXAMINATION OF THE BANK.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK
LIMITED
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Cease and Desist
Other Sanctions: 

3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
04/24/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Banking Products (Other than CD(s))
Other Product Types: 
CREDIT CARDS
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED ("BANK") IS THE PARENT OF THE FIRM. THE BANK RECEIVED AN ORDER DATED APRIL 24, 2024 FROM THE RESERVE
BANK OF INDIA ("RBI"), DIRECTING THE BANK TO CEASE AND DESIST, WITH IMMEDIATE EFFECT FROM (I) ONBOARDING NEW CUSTOMERS THROUGH
THE BANK'S ONLINE AND MOBILE BANKING CHANNELS AND (II) ISSUING FRESH CREDIT CARDS. THE ORDER WAS BASED, INTER ALIA, ON THE
DEFICIENCIES OBSERVED BY THE RBI IN THEIR IT EXAMINATION OF THE BANK.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Settled
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
02/12/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
CEASE AND DESIST, WITH IMMEDIATE EFFECT (ORDER DATED 04/24/2024) FROM (I) ONBOARDING NEW CUSTOMERS THROUGH THE BANK'S
ONLINE AND MOBILE BANKING CHANNELS AND (II) ISSUING FRESH CREDIT CARDS. THE ORDER SHALL BE REVIEWED BY RBI UPON SATISFACTORY
REMEDIATION OF THE OBSERVATIONS MADE IN THEIR IT EXAMINATION OF THE BANK.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE BANK HAD INITIATED REMEDIAL MEASURES TO ADDRESS THE SUPERVISORY CONCERNS AND SUBMITTED COMPLIANCES TO THE RESERVE BANK.
THE BANK ALSO COMMISSIONED AN EXTERNAL AUDIT, WITH PRIOR APPROVAL OF RBI, TO VALIDATE THE COMPLIANCES. NOW, HAVING SATISFIED
ITSELF BASED ON THE SUBMISSIONS, AND REMEDIAL MEASURES UNDERTAKEN BY THE BANK, THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, HAS DECIDED TO LIFT THE
AFORE-MENTIONED RESTRICTIONS I.E. CEASE AND DESIST ORDER PLACED ON KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED.
regulatory · block 10KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITEDPDF pages 80–82
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED
Regulator name — filed text
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 71,245.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Settled

Action status / disposition — filed text

1) LOAN DELIVERY SYSTEM PROCESS HAS BEEN AUTOMATED AND PROCESS GUIDELINES WERE ROLLED OUT ON MARCH 28, 2024. SWEEP WAS EXECUTED FOR MOST OF THE CASES ELIGIBLE FOR LDS AS ON MARCH 31, 2024 WHILE IT WAS DONE FOR ALL CASES EXCEPT ONE AS ON MARCH 31, 2025. THE ONE CASE PENDING AT AS ON MARCH 31, 2025 WAS RESOLVED BY APRIL 6, 2025. 2) POST RECEIPT OF THE COMMUNICATION FROM RBI DATED SEPTEMBER 26, 2023, WHICH STATES THAT 'RECEIVABLES/BOOK DEBTS' OF THE STOCKBROKERS CANNOT BE A SUBSTITUTE FOR THE STIPULATED MARGIN TOWARDS COMPLIANCE WITH MARGIN REQUIREMENTS FOR STOCK BROKERS, THE BANK HAS DISCONTINUED INTRADAY LENDING AGAINST RECEIVABLES AS MARGIN AND COMMUNICATED THE SAME TO THE RBI VIDE ITS LETTER DATED OCTOBER 3, 2023. ALL SUBSEQUENT LENDING HAS BEEN DONE AFTER COMPLYING WITH MARGIN REQUIREMENT AS STIPULATED.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

THE BANK FAILED TO COMPLY WITH PARAGRAPHS 1 AND 6 OF THE RBI 1) CIRCULAR DBR.BP.BC.NO.12/21.04/048/2018-19 DATED DECEMBER 5, 2018 ON 'GUIDELINES ON LOAN SYSTEM FOR DELIVERY OF BANK CREDIT' ("DECEMBER 2018 CIRCULAR") WHEN IT DID NOT ENSURE A MINIMUM LEVEL OF 'LOAN COMPONENT' OF 60% IN CASE OF 67 BORROWERS WITH AN AGGREGATE FUND-BASED WORKING CAPITAL LIMIT OF ?150 CRORE AND ABOVE FROM THE BANKING SYSTEM, AS ON MARCH 31, 2023 - PENALTY LEVIED - INR 0.31 CRORE 2) THE BANK FAILED TO COMPLY WITH PARAGRAPH 2.3.1.2(V) OF THE RBI CIRCULAR DBR.NO.DIR.BC.10/13.03.00/2015-16 DATED JULY 1, 2015 ON 'LOANS AND ADVANCES - STATUTORY AND OTHER RESTRICTIONS' ("2015 CIRCULAR"), WHEN IT SANCTIONED INTRA-DAY LIMITS TO FOUR STOCKBROKERS (CUMULATIVE UTILISATION OF INR 1.46 LAKH CRORE IN 308 TEMPORARY OVERDRAFTS) WITHOUT MAINTAINING A MARGIN OF 50 PER CENT. - PENALTY LEVIED - INR 0.30 CRORE

Sanction detail — filed text

A PENALTY OF APPROX USD 71245 WAS LEVIED AND PAID IN FULL ON APRIL 29, 2025. CONVERSION RATE APPLIED (INR/USD) AS 85.62 AS ON APRIL 17, 2025 FOR CONVERTING INR PENALTY OF INR 6.1 MILLION
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action

g
y
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK
LIMITED
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
03/31/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:

5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Banking Products (Other than CD(s))
Other Product Types: 
LOANS AND ADVANCES
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE BANK FAILED TO COMPLY WITH PARAGRAPHS 1 AND 6 OF THE RBI 1) CIRCULAR DBR.BP.BC.NO.12/21.04/048/2018-19 DATED DECEMBER 5, 2018
ON 'GUIDELINES ON LOAN SYSTEM FOR DELIVERY OF BANK CREDIT' ("DECEMBER 2018 CIRCULAR") WHEN IT DID NOT ENSURE A MINIMUM LEVEL OF
'LOAN COMPONENT' OF 60% IN CASE OF 67 BORROWERS WITH AN AGGREGATE FUND-BASED WORKING CAPITAL LIMIT OF ?150 CRORE AND ABOVE
FROM THE BANKING SYSTEM, AS ON MARCH 31, 2023 - PENALTY LEVIED - INR 0.31 CRORE 2) THE BANK FAILED TO COMPLY WITH PARAGRAPH
2.3.1.2(V) OF THE RBI CIRCULAR DBR.NO.DIR.BC.10/13.03.00/2015-16 DATED JULY 1, 2015 ON 'LOANS AND ADVANCES - STATUTORY AND OTHER
RESTRICTIONS' ("2015 CIRCULAR"), WHEN IT SANCTIONED INTRA-DAY LIMITS TO FOUR STOCKBROKERS (CUMULATIVE UTILISATION OF INR 1.46 LAKH
CRORE IN 308 TEMPORARY OVERDRAFTS) WITHOUT MAINTAINING A MARGIN OF 50 PER CENT. - PENALTY LEVIED - INR 0.30 CRORE
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Settled
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
04/29/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 71,245.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
A PENALTY OF APPROX USD 71245 WAS LEVIED AND PAID IN FULL ON APRIL 29, 2025. CONVERSION RATE APPLIED (INR/USD) AS 85.62 AS ON
APRIL 17, 2025 FOR CONVERTING INR PENALTY OF INR 6.1 MILLION
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
1) LOAN DELIVERY SYSTEM PROCESS HAS BEEN AUTOMATED AND PROCESS GUIDELINES WERE ROLLED OUT ON MARCH 28, 2024. SWEEP WAS
EXECUTED FOR MOST OF THE CASES ELIGIBLE FOR LDS AS ON MARCH 31, 2024 WHILE IT WAS DONE FOR ALL CASES EXCEPT ONE AS ON MARCH 31,
2025. THE ONE CASE PENDING AT AS ON MARCH 31, 2025 WAS RESOLVED BY APRIL 6, 2025. 2) POST RECEIPT OF THE COMMUNICATION FROM RBI
DATED SEPTEMBER 26, 2023, WHICH STATES THAT 'RECEIVABLES/BOOK DEBTS' OF THE STOCKBROKERS CANNOT BE A SUBSTITUTE FOR THE
STIPULATED MARGIN TOWARDS COMPLIANCE WITH MARGIN REQUIREMENTS FOR STOCK BROKERS, THE BANK HAS DISCONTINUED INTRADAY LENDING
AGAINST RECEIVABLES AS MARGIN AND COMMUNICATED THE SAME TO THE RBI VIDE ITS LETTER DATED OCTOBER 3, 2023. ALL SUBSEQUENT LENDING
HAS BEEN DONE AFTER COMPLYING WITH MARGIN REQUIREMENT AS STIPULATED.
regulatory · block 11KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITEDPDF pages 82–84
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED
Regulator name — filed text
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 66,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Settled

Action status / disposition — filed text

A) THE BANK HAD CLOSED, AS OF APRIL 2025, THE SECOND BSBD ACCOUNT WHICH ARE ALSO THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE SCN. B) THE BANKHASDISCONTINUED THE EXISTING BQC ARRANGEMENT WITH TWO BCS WITH EFFECT FROM 01 JANUARY 2025 FOR (A) LOANS SOURCED FROM 01 JAN 2025AND (B) LOANS THAT WERE NOT IN NPA STATUS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2024. HOWEVER, LOANS THAT WERE IN NPA STATUS AS OF DEC 31, 2024 WILLCONTINUE TO BE COVERED UNDER THE EXISTING BQC ARRANGEMENT. (C) THE BANK HAS STOPPED NEW DISBURSEMENT/BUSINESS FROM OTHER TWO BC FROM JANUARY 1, 2025 ONWARDS. C) THE BANK HAVE IMPLEMENTED NECESSARY CONTROLS FOR ACCURATE REPORTING.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

A)ACCESS TO BANKING SERVICES - BASIC SAVINGS BANK DEPOSIT ACCOUNT: THE BANK OPENED ANOTHER BSBD ACCOUNT OF CERTAIN CUSTOMERS WHO WERE ALREADY HOLDING BSBD ACCOUNT IN THE BANK. B)SCOPE OF ACTIVITIES TO BE UNDERTAKEN OF BUSINESS CORRESPONDENTS (BCS): THE BANK HAD ENTERED INTO AN ARRANGEMENT WITH BCS FOR UNDERTAKING ACTIVITIES, WHICH ARE NOT COVERED WITHIN THE SCOPE OF ACTIVITIES THAT CAN BE UNDERTAKEN BY BCS. THE BANK HAD BUSINESS QUALITY COMMITMENT (BQC) ARRANGEMENT WITH ITS BCS WHICH PROVIDED FOR RISK-SHARING OF UP TO 10% ON DISBURSED LOANS LINKED TO PERFORMANCE OF THE LOAN AND WAS IN THE NATURE OF DEFAULT LOSS GUARANTEE. C)CREDIT INFORMATION COMPANIES RULES, 2006 (CLC RULES) - THE BANK FURNISHED INACCURATE INFORMATION (REPORTED ONE-TIME SETTLED (OTS) ACCOUNTS AS "CLOSED" INSTEAD OF "SETTLED", IN RESPECT OF CERTAIN BORROWERS TO CREDIT INFORMATION COMPANIES (CICS).

Sanction detail — filed text

ON DECEMBER 19, 2025, RBI HAD LEVIED PENALTY OF INR 0.62 CRORE (APPROX USD 66000) ON THE BANK FOR NON-COMPLIANCE WITH RBI DIRECTIONS AS STATED ABOVE.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)

11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK
LIMITED
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
12/19/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):

6.
Principal Product Type:
Banking Products (Other than CD(s))
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
A)ACCESS TO BANKING SERVICES - BASIC SAVINGS BANK DEPOSIT ACCOUNT: THE BANK OPENED ANOTHER BSBD ACCOUNT OF CERTAIN CUSTOMERS
WHO WERE ALREADY HOLDING BSBD ACCOUNT IN THE BANK. B)SCOPE OF ACTIVITIES TO BE UNDERTAKEN OF BUSINESS CORRESPONDENTS (BCS):
THE BANK HAD ENTERED INTO AN ARRANGEMENT WITH BCS FOR UNDERTAKING ACTIVITIES, WHICH ARE NOT COVERED WITHIN THE SCOPE OF
ACTIVITIES THAT CAN BE UNDERTAKEN BY BCS. THE BANK HAD BUSINESS QUALITY COMMITMENT (BQC) ARRANGEMENT WITH ITS BCS WHICH
PROVIDED FOR RISK-SHARING OF UP TO 10% ON DISBURSED LOANS LINKED TO PERFORMANCE OF THE LOAN AND WAS IN THE NATURE OF DEFAULT
LOSS GUARANTEE. C)CREDIT INFORMATION COMPANIES RULES, 2006 (CLC RULES) - THE BANK FURNISHED INACCURATE INFORMATION (REPORTED
ONE-TIME SETTLED (OTS) ACCOUNTS AS "CLOSED" INSTEAD OF "SETTLED", IN RESPECT OF CERTAIN BORROWERS TO CREDIT INFORMATION
COMPANIES (CICS).
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Settled
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
12/23/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 66,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
ON DECEMBER 19, 2025, RBI HAD LEVIED PENALTY OF INR 0.62 CRORE (APPROX USD 66000) ON THE BANK FOR NON-COMPLIANCE WITH RBI
DIRECTIONS AS STATED ABOVE.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
A) THE BANK HAD CLOSED, AS OF APRIL 2025, THE SECOND BSBD ACCOUNT WHICH ARE ALSO THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE SCN. B) THE
BANKHASDISCONTINUED THE EXISTING BQC ARRANGEMENT WITH TWO BCS WITH EFFECT FROM 01 JANUARY 2025 FOR (A) LOANS SOURCED FROM 01
JAN 2025AND (B) LOANS THAT WERE NOT IN NPA STATUS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2024. HOWEVER, LOANS THAT WERE IN NPA STATUS AS OF DEC 31,
2024 WILLCONTINUE TO BE COVERED UNDER THE EXISTING BQC ARRANGEMENT. (C) THE BANK HAS STOPPED NEW DISBURSEMENT/BUSINESS FROM
OTHER TWO BC FROM JANUARY 1, 2025 ONWARDS. C) THE BANK HAVE IMPLEMENTED NECESSARY CONTROLS FOR ACCURATE REPORTING.

* Metrics are based on the latest available data, including Form ADV filings, brochures, and relationship summaries pulled from the SEC IAPD, and may be subject to change. Learn what is included in the Rialytix data. Please refer to the firm's official disclosures for the most accurate information using their CRD number. This is not investment advice.