Assets under management Growth by Quarter
Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.
Private Funds
Private funds reported by Gulf International Bank (UK) Limited
Employee Growth by Quarter
Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.
Historical AUM and employee figures reflect available SEC Form ADV filings under this CRD. Filing gaps may reflect registration status changes, dormant periods, state registration periods, firm restructuring, or other reporting changes. Rialytix does not interpolate missing periods.
Ownership
Reported direct and indirect ownership ranges
Reported ownership ranges
Highlighted bands show the percentage range reported in Form ADV.
Bars represent the reported range at that individual ownership step, not an estimated percentage of the advisory firm. Indirect relationships may refer to intermediate entities rather than directly to Gulf International Bank (UK) Limited.
Reported ownership and control details
Form ADV · Filing date 2026-03-25 · Schedules A and B
| # | Owner / person & role | Interest in entity | Reported interest | Control person | Title / status acquired | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DAVID JOHN MASKALLCHIEF OPERATING OFFICERIndividual | GULF INTERNATIONAL BANK (UK) LIMITED | Less than 5%Code NA | No | CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER11/2014 | Schedule APDF page 27 |
| 2 | GULF INTERNATIONAL BANK BSCSHAREHOLDERForeign entity | GULF INTERNATIONAL BANK (UK) LIMITED | 75% or moreCode E | Yes | SHAREHOLDER04/1999 | Schedule APDF page 27 |
| 3 | Katherine Lucy Garrett-CoxCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERIndividual | GULF INTERNATIONAL BANK (UK) LIMITED | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER12/2017 | Schedule APDF page 27 |
| 4 | LOUISE ELIZABETH OADESCHEIF LEGAL & COMPLIANCE OFFICERIndividual | GULF INTERNATIONAL BANK (UK) LIMITED | Less than 5%Code NA | No | CHEIF LEGAL & COMPLIANCE OFFICER06/2019 | Schedule APDF page 27 |
| 5 | RALPH MCGREGOR CAMPBELLCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERIndividual | GULF INTERNATIONAL BANK (UK) LIMITED | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER01/2019 | Schedule APDF page 27 |
| 6 | PUBLIC INVESTMENT FUND OF SAUDI ARABIASHAREHOLDERForeign entity | GULF INTERNATIONAL BANK BSC | 75% or moreCode E | Yes | SHAREHOLDER01/2010 | Schedule BPDF page 27 |
Less than 5% may include zero. Code F identifies a role without specifying a percentage. Reported interests may overlap and may not include every owner. Total indirect ownership is not calculated.
Compliance & Disclosures
Filing dated 3/25/2026 11:48:52 AM
Responses were selected by the RIA in its filing. Questions are shortened for readability; “you” refers to the reporting firm, and some questions also cover advisory affiliates.
AFelonies2 No
In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:
- A1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a felony?No
- A2Been charged with a felony?No
BMisdemeanors2 No
In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:
- B1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a misdemeanor involving investments, an investment-related business, fraud, false statements or omissions, wrongful taking of property, bribery, perjury, forgery, counterfeiting, or extortion?No
- B2Been charged with a misdemeanor of the kind listed above?No
CSEC or CFTC actions5 No
Has the SEC or CFTC ever:
- C1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
- C2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated SEC or CFTC regulations or statutes?No
- C3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- C4Entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
- C5Imposed a civil money penalty on you or an advisory affiliate, or ordered you or an advisory affiliate to cease and desist from any activity?No
DOther regulatory actions5 No
Has any other federal regulatory agency, state regulatory agency, or foreign financial regulatory authority ever:
- D1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission, or was dishonest, unfair, or unethical?No
- D2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related regulations or statutes?No
- D3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- D4In the past ten years, entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
- D5Denied, suspended, or revoked your or an advisory affiliate’s registration or license, or otherwise prevented association with an investment-related business or restricted activities?No
ESelf-regulatory organization actions4 No
Has a self-regulatory organization or commodities exchange ever:
- E1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
- E2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated its rules, other than a violation designated as a minor rule violation under an SEC-approved plan?No
- E3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- E4Disciplined you or an advisory affiliate by expulsion, suspension, barring association with other members, or otherwise restricting activities?No
FProfessional authorizations1 No
- FHas an authorization to act as an attorney, accountant, or federal contractor granted to you or an advisory affiliate ever been revoked or suspended?No
GPending regulatory proceedings1 Yes
- GAre you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a regulatory proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of C, D, or E?Yes
HCivil judicial actions and proceedings4 No
(1) Court actions
Has a domestic or foreign court:
- H(1)(a)In the past ten years, enjoined you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
- H(1)(b)Found that you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related statutes or regulations?No
- H(1)(c)Dismissed, pursuant to a settlement agreement, an investment-related civil action brought against you or an advisory affiliate by a state or foreign financial regulatory authority?No
(2) Pending civil proceedings
- H(2)Are you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a civil proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of H(1)?No
Additional DRP filings 4 source blocks
Verbatim excerpts from supporting DRP filings, which may concern the firm or advisory affiliates. Amounts retain their filed labels; no total or attribution is inferred.
regulatory · block 1PDF pages 28–29
- Regulator name — filed text
- OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL, US DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY (OFAC)
Action status / disposition — filed text
GIB(UK) WAS INSTRUCTED BY A NON-US CLIENT TO MAKE FIVE PAYMENTS IN US DOLLARS (US$124, 000 IN TOTAL) TO AN ACCOUNT IN TURKEY HELD BY A MULTI- JURISDICTIONAL ENTITY. GIB(UK) WAS NOT AWARE AT THE TIME THESE PAYMENTS WERE MADE THAT THE ENTITY WAS HEADQUARTERED IN IRAN. PAYMENT INSTRUCTIONS GAVE NO INDICATION OF HEADQUARTER DOMICILE AND GIB(UK)'S SANCTION CHECKING PROCESS DID NOT IDENTIFY THE LINK TO IRAN. THE TRANSACTIONS WERE EFFECTED THROUGH GIB(UK)'S CORRESPONDENT BANK, THE LAST OF WHICH WAS BLOCKED IN NOVEMBER 2013. FOLLOWING NOTIFICATION OF THE LINK TO IRAN BY THE CORRESPONDENT BANK, GIB(UK) APPLIED TO OFAC FOR UNBLOCKING OF THE LAST TRANSACTION IN DECEMBER 2013. IN MAY 2014, GIB(UK) SELF-REPORTED THE TRANSACTIONS TO OFAC PURSUANT TO OFAC'S ENFORCEMENT GUIDELINES FOR ECONOMIC SANCTIONS (31 C.F.R. PART 501, APPENDIX A). AS AT THE DATE OF THIS REPORT THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN DENIED.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
GIB(UK) WAS INSTRUCTED BY A NON-US CLIENT TO MAKE FIVE PAYMENTS IN US DOLLARS (US$124, 000 IN TOTAL) TO AN ACCOUNT IN TURKEY HELD BY A MULTI- JURISDICTIONAL ENTITY. GIB(UK) WAS NOT AWARE AT THE TIME THESE PAYMENTS WERE MADE THAT THE ENTITY WAS HEADQUARTERED IN IRAN. PAYMENT INSTRUCTIONS GAVE NO INDICATION OF HEADQUARTER DOMICILE AND GIB(UK)'S SANCTION CHECKING PROCESS DID NOT IDENTIFY THE LINK TO IRAN. THE TRANSACTIONS WERE EFFECTED THROUGH GIB(UK)'S CORRESPONDENT BANK, THE LAST OF WHICH WAS BLOCKED IN NOVEMBER 2013. FOLLOWING NOTIFICATION OF THE LINK TO IRAN BY THE CORRESPONDENT BANK, GIB(UK) APPLIED TO OFAC FOR UNBLOCKING OF THE LAST TRANSACTION IN DECEMBER 2013. IN MAY 2014, GIB(UK) SELF-REPORTED THE TRANSACTIONS TO OFAC PURSUANT TO OFAC'S ENFORCEMENT GUIDELINES FOR ECONOMIC SANCTIONS (31 C.F.R. PART 501, APPENDIX A). AS AT THE DATE OF THIS REPORT THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN DENIED.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE No Information Filed This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL, US DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY (OFAC) 2. Principal Sanction: Other Other Sanctions: NO SANCTIONS HAVE BEEN ASSESSED AS OF THE DATE OF THIS FILING. GIB (UK) IS COMPLETING THIS REPORTING PAGE AS A RESULT OF A PENDING PROCEEDING WITH OFAC. THERE HAVE BEEN NO FORMAL COMMUNICATIONS WITH OFAC SINCE THE DATE OF GIB(UK)'S LAST ANNUAL UPDATE TO FORM ADV. AS AT THE DATE OF THIS REPORT THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN DENIED. 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 05/23/2014 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: THE DATE PROVIDED IS THE DATE OF GIB UK'S WRITTEN SELF-REPORT TO OFAC. 4. Docket/Case Number: IA-2013-306322-1 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: Other Other Product Types: THE PENDING PROCEEDING WITH OFAC RELATES TO CERTAIN TRANSFERS OF FUNDS DENOMINATED IN US DOLLARS. 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): GIB(UK) WAS INSTRUCTED BY A NON-US CLIENT TO MAKE FIVE PAYMENTS IN US DOLLARS (US$124, 000 IN TOTAL) TO AN ACCOUNT IN TURKEY HELD BY A MULTI- JURISDICTIONAL ENTITY. GIB(UK) WAS NOT AWARE AT THE TIME THESE PAYMENTS WERE MADE THAT THE ENTITY WAS HEADQUARTERED IN IRAN. PAYMENT INSTRUCTIONS GAVE NO INDICATION OF HEADQUARTER DOMICILE AND GIB(UK)'S SANCTION CHECKING PROCESS DID NOT IDENTIFY THE LINK TO IRAN. THE TRANSACTIONS WERE EFFECTED THROUGH GIB(UK)'S CORRESPONDENT BANK, THE LAST OF WHICH WAS BLOCKED IN NOVEMBER 2013. FOLLOWING NOTIFICATION OF THE LINK TO IRAN BY THE CORRESPONDENT BANK, GIB(UK) APPLIED TO OFAC FOR UNBLOCKING OF THE LAST TRANSACTION IN DECEMBER 2013. IN MAY 2014, GIB(UK) SELF-REPORTED THE TRANSACTIONS TO OFAC PURSUANT TO OFAC'S ENFORCEMENT GUIDELINES FOR ECONOMIC SANCTIONS (31 C.F.R. PART 501, APPENDIX A). AS AT THE DATE OF THIS REPORT THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN DENIED. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). GIB(UK) WAS INSTRUCTED BY A NON-US CLIENT TO MAKE FIVE PAYMENTS IN US DOLLARS (US$124, 000 IN TOTAL) TO AN ACCOUNT IN TURKEY HELD BY A MULTI- JURISDICTIONAL ENTITY. GIB(UK) WAS NOT AWARE AT THE TIME THESE PAYMENTS WERE MADE THAT THE ENTITY WAS HEADQUARTERED IN IRAN. PAYMENT INSTRUCTIONS GAVE NO INDICATION OF HEADQUARTER DOMICILE AND GIB(UK)'S SANCTION CHECKING PROCESS DID NOT IDENTIFY THE LINK TO IRAN. THE TRANSACTIONS WERE EFFECTED THROUGH GIB(UK)'S CORRESPONDENT BANK, THE LAST OF WHICH WAS BLOCKED IN NOVEMBER 2013. FOLLOWING NOTIFICATION OF THE LINK TO IRAN BY THE CORRESPONDENT BANK, GIB(UK) APPLIED TO OFAC FOR UNBLOCKING OF THE LAST TRANSACTION IN DECEMBER 2013. IN MAY 2014, GIB(UK) SELF-REPORTED THE TRANSACTIONS TO OFAC PURSUANT TO OFAC'S ENFORCEMENT GUIDELINES FOR ECONOMIC SANCTIONS (31 C.F.R. PART 501, APPENDIX A). AS AT THE DATE OF THIS REPORT THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN DENIED.
regulatory · block 2PDF pages 30–31
- Regulator name — filed text
- OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL, US DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY (OFAC)
Action status / disposition — filed text
OUR NON-US CLIENT INSTRUCTED US TO MAKE A PAYMENT TO AN INDIVIDUAL IN AFGHANISTAN AS PART OF THEIR SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM FOR US$927.50 FOR VALUE 3 AUGUST. WITHIN THEIR PAYMENT INSTRUCTION WAS INCLUDED AN INTERMEDIARY BANK, CITIBANK AND AN ACCOUNT NUMBER 36313578. GIB(UK) MADE THE PAYMENT AS INSTRUCTED BY OUR CLIENT VIA OUR CORRESPONDENT BANK ACCOUNT WITH JP MORGAN. SOME TIME LATER JPMORGAN NOTIFIED US THAT THE FUNDS WERE BLOCKED AND REPORTED TO OFAC. IT WAS THEN UNDERSTOOD THAT THE ACCOUNT NUMBER AT CITIBANK THAT WAS QUOTED IN THE PAYMENT INSTRUCTION BELONGED TO TRANSKAPITALBANK, A RUSSIAN BANK THAT WAS SUBJECT TO SANCTIONS. GIB(UK) WAS SUBSEQUENTLY NOTIFIED THAT THIS PAYMENT HAD BEEN BLOCKED AND REPORTED TO OFAC PURSUANT TO THE RUSSIAN SANCTIONS REGULATIONS. GIB(UK) APPLIED TO OFAC FOR A LICENCE TO EFFECT THIS PAYMENT. ON 19 SEPTEMBER 2025, JP MORGAN RETURNED THE PAYMENT TO GIB(UK) WITH INTEREST AND WE HAVE RETURNED IT TO OUR CLIENT.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
OUR NON-US CLIENT INSTRUCTED US TO MAKE A PAYMENT TO AN INDIVIDUAL IN AFGHANISTAN AS PART OF THEIR SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM FOR US$927.50 FOR VALUE 3 AUGUST. WITHIN THEIR PAYMENT INSTRUCTION WAS INCLUDED AN INTERMEDIARY BANK, CITIBANK AND AN ACCOUNT NUMBER 36313578. GIB(UK) MADE THE PAYMENT AS INSTRUCTED BY OUR CLIENT VIA OUR CORRESPONDENT BANK ACCOUNT WITH JP MORGAN. SOME TIME LATER JPMORGAN NOTIFIED US THAT THE FUNDS WERE BLOCKED AND REPORTED TO OFAC. IT WAS THEN UNDERSTOOD THAT THE ACCOUNT NUMBER AT CITIBANK THAT WAS QUOTED IN THE PAYMENT INSTRUCTION BELONGED TO TRANSKAPITALBANK, A RUSSIAN BANK THAT WAS SUBJECT TO SANCTIONS. GIB(UK) WAS SUBSEQUENTLY NOTIFIED THAT THIS PAYMENT HAD BEEN BLOCKED AND REPORTED TO OFAC PURSUANT TO THE RUSSIAN SANCTIONS REGULATIONS. GIB(UK) APPLIED TO OFAC FOR A LICENCE TO EFFECT THIS PAYMENT. ON 19 SEPTEMBER 2025, JP MORGAN RETURNED THE PAYMENT TO GIB(UK) WITH INTEREST AND WE HAVE RETURNED IT TO OUR CLIENT.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE No Information Filed This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL, US DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY (OFAC) 2. Principal Sanction: Other Sanctions: 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 11/18/2022 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: RUSSIA-EO14024-2022-1004859-1 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: Other Other Product Types: THE PENDING PROCEEDING WITH OFAC RELATES TO CERTAIN TRANSFERS OF FUNDS DENOMINATED IN US DOLLARS. 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): OUR NON-US CLIENT INSTRUCTED US TO MAKE A PAYMENT TO AN INDIVIDUAL IN AFGHANISTAN AS PART OF THEIR SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM FOR US$927.50 FOR VALUE 3 AUGUST. WITHIN THEIR PAYMENT INSTRUCTION WAS INCLUDED AN INTERMEDIARY BANK, CITIBANK AND AN ACCOUNT NUMBER 36313578. GIB(UK) MADE THE PAYMENT AS INSTRUCTED BY OUR CLIENT VIA OUR CORRESPONDENT BANK ACCOUNT WITH JP MORGAN. SOME TIME LATER JPMORGAN NOTIFIED US THAT THE FUNDS WERE BLOCKED AND REPORTED TO OFAC. IT WAS THEN UNDERSTOOD THAT THE ACCOUNT NUMBER AT CITIBANK THAT WAS QUOTED IN THE PAYMENT INSTRUCTION BELONGED TO TRANSKAPITALBANK, A RUSSIAN BANK THAT WAS SUBJECT TO SANCTIONS. GIB(UK) WAS SUBSEQUENTLY NOTIFIED THAT THIS PAYMENT HAD BEEN BLOCKED AND REPORTED TO OFAC PURSUANT TO THE RUSSIAN SANCTIONS REGULATIONS. GIB(UK) APPLIED TO OFAC FOR A LICENCE TO EFFECT THIS PAYMENT. ON 19 SEPTEMBER 2025, JP MORGAN RETURNED THE PAYMENT TO GIB(UK) WITH INTEREST AND WE HAVE RETURNED IT TO OUR CLIENT. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). OUR NON-US CLIENT INSTRUCTED US TO MAKE A PAYMENT TO AN INDIVIDUAL IN AFGHANISTAN AS PART OF THEIR SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM FOR US$927.50 FOR VALUE 3 AUGUST. WITHIN THEIR PAYMENT INSTRUCTION WAS INCLUDED AN INTERMEDIARY BANK, CITIBANK AND AN ACCOUNT NUMBER 36313578. GIB(UK) MADE THE PAYMENT AS INSTRUCTED BY OUR CLIENT VIA OUR CORRESPONDENT BANK ACCOUNT WITH JP MORGAN. SOME TIME LATER JPMORGAN NOTIFIED US THAT THE FUNDS WERE BLOCKED AND REPORTED TO OFAC. IT WAS THEN UNDERSTOOD THAT THE ACCOUNT NUMBER AT CITIBANK THAT WAS QUOTED IN THE PAYMENT INSTRUCTION BELONGED TO TRANSKAPITALBANK, A RUSSIAN BANK THAT WAS SUBJECT TO SANCTIONS. GIB(UK) WAS SUBSEQUENTLY NOTIFIED THAT THIS PAYMENT HAD BEEN BLOCKED AND REPORTED TO OFAC PURSUANT TO THE RUSSIAN SANCTIONS REGULATIONS. GIB(UK) APPLIED TO OFAC FOR A LICENCE TO EFFECT THIS PAYMENT. ON 19 SEPTEMBER 2025, JP MORGAN RETURNED THE PAYMENT TO GIB(UK) WITH INTEREST AND WE HAVE RETURNED IT TO OUR CLIENT.
regulatory · block 3PDF pages 31–33
- Regulator name — filed text
- OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL, US DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY (OFAC)
Action status / disposition — filed text
A PAYMENT INSTRUCTION WAS RECEIVED FROM OUR NON-US CLIENT TO PAY A SALARY TO AN INDIVIDUAL IN KYRGYZSTAN AT A LOCAL BANK, VALUE USD5638.64. WHEN PROCESSING THIS TRANSACTION WE SELECTED SBERBANK AS THEIR CORRESPONDENT BANK TO EFFECT USD PAYMENTS. WE WERE LATER NOTIFIED BY HSBC, OUR USD CORRESPONDENT BANK THAT THEY HAD FROZEN THE PAYMENT AND REPORTED IT TO OFAC DUE TO THE SANCTIONS BREACH. WE HAVE APPLIED TO OFAC FOR A LICENCE TO EFFECT THIS PAYMENT, WHICH IS CURRENTLY PENDING WITH THEM.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
A PAYMENT INSTRUCTION WAS RECEIVED FROM OUR NON-US CLIENT TO PAY A SALARY TO AN INDIVIDUAL IN KYRGYZSTAN AT A LOCAL BANK, VALUE USD5638.64. WHEN PROCESSING THIS TRANSACTION WE SELECTED SBERBANK AS THEIR CORRESPONDENT BANK TO EFFECT USD PAYMENTS. WE WERE LATER NOTIFIED BY HSBC, OUR USD CORRESPONDENT BANK THAT THEY HAD FROZEN THE PAYMENT AND REPORTED IT TO OFAC DUE TO THE SANCTIONS BREACH. WE HAVE APPLIED TO OFAC FOR A LICENCE TO EFFECT THIS PAYMENT, WHICH IS CURRENTLY PENDING WITH THEM.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE No Information Filed This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL, US DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY (OFAC) 2. Principal Sanction: Other Other Sanctions: NO SANCTIONS HAVE BEEN ASSESSED AS OF THE DATE OF THIS FILING. GIB (UK) IS COMPLETING THIS REPORTING PAGE AS A RESULT OF A PENDING PROCEEDING WITH OFAC. 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 01/18/2023 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: RUSSIA-EO14024-2023-1032862-1 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: Other Other Product Types: THE PENDING PROCEEDING WITH OFAC RELATES TO CERTAIN TRANSFERS OF FUNDS DENOMINATED IN US DOLLARS. 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): A PAYMENT INSTRUCTION WAS RECEIVED FROM OUR NON-US CLIENT TO PAY A SALARY TO AN INDIVIDUAL IN KYRGYZSTAN AT A LOCAL BANK, VALUE USD5638.64. WHEN PROCESSING THIS TRANSACTION WE SELECTED SBERBANK AS THEIR CORRESPONDENT BANK TO EFFECT USD PAYMENTS. WE WERE LATER NOTIFIED BY HSBC, OUR USD CORRESPONDENT BANK THAT THEY HAD FROZEN THE PAYMENT AND REPORTED IT TO OFAC DUE TO THE SANCTIONS BREACH. WE HAVE APPLIED TO OFAC FOR A LICENCE TO EFFECT THIS PAYMENT, WHICH IS CURRENTLY PENDING WITH THEM. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). A PAYMENT INSTRUCTION WAS RECEIVED FROM OUR NON-US CLIENT TO PAY A SALARY TO AN INDIVIDUAL IN KYRGYZSTAN AT A LOCAL BANK, VALUE USD5638.64. WHEN PROCESSING THIS TRANSACTION WE SELECTED SBERBANK AS THEIR CORRESPONDENT BANK TO EFFECT USD PAYMENTS. WE WERE LATER NOTIFIED BY HSBC, OUR USD CORRESPONDENT BANK THAT THEY HAD FROZEN THE PAYMENT AND REPORTED IT TO OFAC DUE TO THE SANCTIONS BREACH. WE HAVE APPLIED TO OFAC FOR A LICENCE TO EFFECT THIS PAYMENT, WHICH IS CURRENTLY PENDING WITH THEM.
regulatory · block 4PDF pages 33–35
- Regulator name — filed text
- OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL, US DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY (OFAC)
Action status / disposition — filed text
IN DECEMBER 2024, JP MORGAN, OUR US$ CORRESPONDENT BANK, BLOCKED AND REPORTED TO OFAC A PAYMENT TO AN INDIVIDUAL OF USD2,200 DUE TO A SUPPOSED BREACH OF IRANIAN SANCTIONS REGULATIONS. OUR INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS HAVE CONCLUDED THAT THERE WAS NO SANCTIONS BREACH. THIS PAYMENT WENT DIRECTLY TO A NIGERIAN INDIVIDUAL WHO IS STUDYING IN MALAYSIA, WHOSE BANK ACCOUNT IS HELD WITH A LARGE KUWAITI BANK, SO IT WAS CLEAR TO US THAT THERE WAS NO NEXUS TO IRAN. WE HAVE ALSO OBTAINED THE BENEFICIARY'S PASSPORT TO VERIFY THE INFORMATION. WE HAVE EXPLAINED OUR FINDINGS AND RATIONALE TO JP MORGAN, WHICH HAS STOOD BY ITS DECISION. GIB(UK) APPLIED TO OFAC FOR A LICENSE TO HAVE THE FUNDS UNBLOCKED WITH NO UPDATES FROM OFAC SO FAR.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
IN DECEMBER 2024, JP MORGAN, OUR US$ CORRESPONDENT BANK, BLOCKED AND REPORTED TO OFAC A PAYMENT TO AN INDIVIDUAL OF USD2,200 DUE TO A SUPPOSED BREACH OF IRANIAN SANCTIONS REGULATIONS. OUR INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS HAVE CONCLUDED THAT THERE WAS NO SANCTIONS BREACH. THIS PAYMENT WENT DIRECTLY TO A NIGERIAN INDIVIDUAL WHO IS STUDYING IN MALAYSIA, WHOSE BANK ACCOUNT IS HELD WITH A LARGE KUWAITI BANK, SO IT WAS CLEAR TO US THAT THERE WAS NO NEXUS TO IRAN. WE HAVE ALSO OBTAINED THE BENEFICIARY'S PASSPORT TO VERIFY THE INFORMATION. WE HAVE EXPLAINED OUR FINDINGS AND RATIONALE TO JP MORGAN, WHICH HAS STOOD BY ITS DECISION. GIB(UK) APPLIED TO OFAC FOR A LICENSE TO HAVE THE FUNDS UNBLOCKED WITH NO UPDATES FROM OFAC SO FAR.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE No Information Filed This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL, US DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY (OFAC) 2. Principal Sanction: Other Other Sanctions: NO SANCTIONS HAVE BEEN ASSESSED AS OF THE DATE OF THIS FILING. GIB (UK) IS COMPLETING THIS REPORTING PAGE AS A RESULT OF A PENDING PROCEEDING WITH OFAC. 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 12/12/2024 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: Other Other Product Types: THE PENDING PROCEEDING WITH OFAC RELATES TO CERTAIN TRANSFERS OF FUNDS DENOMINATED IN US DOLLARS 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): IN DECEMBER 2024, JP MORGAN, OUR US$ CORRESPONDENT BANK, BLOCKED AND REPORTED TO OFAC A PAYMENT TO AN INDIVIDUAL OF USD2,200 DUE TO A SUPPOSED BREACH OF IRANIAN SANCTIONS REGULATIONS. OUR INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS HAVE CONCLUDED THAT THERE WAS NO SANCTIONS BREACH. THIS PAYMENT WENT DIRECTLY TO A NIGERIAN INDIVIDUAL WHO IS STUDYING IN MALAYSIA, WHOSE BANK ACCOUNT IS HELD WITH A LARGE KUWAITI BANK, SO IT WAS CLEAR TO US THAT THERE WAS NO NEXUS TO IRAN. WE HAVE ALSO OBTAINED THE BENEFICIARY'S PASSPORT TO VERIFY THE INFORMATION. WE HAVE EXPLAINED OUR FINDINGS AND RATIONALE TO JP MORGAN, WHICH HAS STOOD BY ITS DECISION. GIB(UK) APPLIED TO OFAC FOR A LICENSE TO HAVE THE FUNDS UNBLOCKED WITH NO UPDATES FROM OFAC SO FAR. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). IN DECEMBER 2024, JP MORGAN, OUR US$ CORRESPONDENT BANK, BLOCKED AND REPORTED TO OFAC A PAYMENT TO AN INDIVIDUAL OF USD2,200 DUE TO A SUPPOSED BREACH OF IRANIAN SANCTIONS REGULATIONS. OUR INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS HAVE CONCLUDED THAT THERE WAS NO SANCTIONS BREACH. THIS PAYMENT WENT DIRECTLY TO A NIGERIAN INDIVIDUAL WHO IS STUDYING IN MALAYSIA, WHOSE BANK ACCOUNT IS HELD WITH A LARGE KUWAITI BANK, SO IT WAS CLEAR TO US THAT THERE WAS NO NEXUS TO IRAN. WE HAVE ALSO OBTAINED THE BENEFICIARY'S PASSPORT TO VERIFY THE INFORMATION. WE HAVE EXPLAINED OUR FINDINGS AND RATIONALE TO JP MORGAN, WHICH HAS STOOD BY ITS DECISION. GIB(UK) APPLIED TO OFAC FOR A LICENSE TO HAVE THE FUNDS UNBLOCKED WITH NO UPDATES FROM OFAC SO FAR.
* Metrics are based on the latest available data, including Form ADV filings, brochures, and relationship summaries pulled from the SEC IAPD, and may be subject to change. Learn what is included in the Rialytix data. Please refer to the firm's official disclosures for the most accurate information using their CRD number. This is not investment advice.