Assets under management Growth by Quarter
Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.
Private Funds
Private funds reported by Bmo Nesbitt Burns Securities Ltd..
Employee Growth by Quarter
Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.
Historical AUM and employee figures reflect available SEC Form ADV filings under this CRD. Filing gaps may reflect registration status changes, dormant periods, state registration periods, firm restructuring, or other reporting changes. Rialytix does not interpolate missing periods.
Ownership
Reported direct and indirect ownership ranges
Reported ownership ranges
Highlighted bands show the percentage range reported in Form ADV.
Bars represent the reported range at that individual ownership step, not an estimated percentage of the advisory firm. Indirect relationships may refer to intermediate entities rather than directly to Bmo Nesbitt Burns Securities Ltd...
Reported ownership and control details
Form ADV · Filing date 2026-09-08 · Schedules A and B
| # | Owner / person & role | Interest in entity | Reported interest | Control person | Title / status acquired | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BMO NESBITT BURNS INC.SOLE SHAREHOLDERForeign entity | BMO NESBITT BURNS SECURITIES LTD. | 75% or moreCode E | Yes | SOLE SHAREHOLDER09/1997 | Schedule APDF page 63 |
| 2 | WILLIAM A L BROWNDIRECTORIndividual | BMO NESBITT BURNS SECURITIES LTD. | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | DIRECTOR01/2012 | Schedule APDF page 63 |
| 3 | BRUCE AARON FERMANCHAIRMAN OF THE BOARDIndividual | BMO NESBITT BURNS SECURITIES LTD. | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD09/2016 | Schedule APDF page 63 |
| 4 | DEVANAND NMN PERSAUDPRESIDENTIndividual | BMO NESBITT BURNS SECURITIES LTD. | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | PRESIDENT05/2023 | Schedule APDF page 63 |
| 5 | STEPHEN MICHAEL GIGLIOTTICHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICERIndividual | BMO NESBITT BURNS SECURITIES LTD. | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER07/2020 | Schedule APDF page 63 |
| 6 | IAN KENNETH NARINECFOIndividual | BMO NESBITT BURNS SECURITIES LTD. | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | CFO11/2022 | Schedule APDF page 63 |
| 7 | Stephanie Ann LakeDIRECTORIndividual | BMO NESBITT BURNS SECURITIES LTD. | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | DIRECTOR07/2024 | Schedule APDF page 63 |
| 8 | Mauro RiganteDIRECTORIndividual | BMO NESBITT BURNS SECURITIES LTD. | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | DIRECTOR06/2025 | Schedule APDF page 63 |
| 9 | BANK OF MONTREAL HOLDING INC.SOLE SHAREHOLDER - VIA ORGANIZATIONAL AMALGAMATIONForeign entity | BMO NESBITT BURNS INC. | 75% or moreCode E | Yes | SOLE SHAREHOLDER - VIA ORGANIZATIONAL AMALGAMATION01/2022 | Schedule BPDF page 64 |
| 10 | BANK OF MONTREALSOLE SHAREHOLDERForeign entity | BANK OF MONTREAL HOLDING INC. | 75% or moreCode E | Yes | SOLE SHAREHOLDER09/1997 | Schedule BPDF page 64 |
Less than 5% may include zero. Code F identifies a role without specifying a percentage. Reported interests may overlap and may not include every owner. Total indirect ownership is not calculated.
Compliance & Disclosures
Filing dated 9/8/2026 1:49:00 PM
Responses were selected by the RIA in its filing. Questions are shortened for readability; “you” refers to the reporting firm, and some questions also cover advisory affiliates.
AFelonies2 No
In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:
- A1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a felony?No
- A2Been charged with a felony?No
BMisdemeanors2 No
In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:
- B1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a misdemeanor involving investments, an investment-related business, fraud, false statements or omissions, wrongful taking of property, bribery, perjury, forgery, counterfeiting, or extortion?No
- B2Been charged with a misdemeanor of the kind listed above?No
CSEC or CFTC actions3 Yes2 No
Has the SEC or CFTC ever:
- C1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
- C2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated SEC or CFTC regulations or statutes?Yes
- C3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- C4Entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?Yes
- C5Imposed a civil money penalty on you or an advisory affiliate, or ordered you or an advisory affiliate to cease and desist from any activity?Yes
DOther regulatory actions2 Yes3 No
Has any other federal regulatory agency, state regulatory agency, or foreign financial regulatory authority ever:
- D1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission, or was dishonest, unfair, or unethical?No
- D2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related regulations or statutes?Yes
- D3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- D4In the past ten years, entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?Yes
- D5Denied, suspended, or revoked your or an advisory affiliate’s registration or license, or otherwise prevented association with an investment-related business or restricted activities?No
ESelf-regulatory organization actions1 Yes3 No
Has a self-regulatory organization or commodities exchange ever:
- E1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
- E2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated its rules, other than a violation designated as a minor rule violation under an SEC-approved plan?Yes
- E3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- E4Disciplined you or an advisory affiliate by expulsion, suspension, barring association with other members, or otherwise restricting activities?No
FProfessional authorizations1 No
- FHas an authorization to act as an attorney, accountant, or federal contractor granted to you or an advisory affiliate ever been revoked or suspended?No
GPending regulatory proceedings1 No
- GAre you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a regulatory proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of C, D, or E?No
HCivil judicial actions and proceedings4 No
(1) Court actions
Has a domestic or foreign court:
- H(1)(a)In the past ten years, enjoined you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
- H(1)(b)Found that you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related statutes or regulations?No
- H(1)(c)Dismissed, pursuant to a settlement agreement, an investment-related civil action brought against you or an advisory affiliate by a state or foreign financial regulatory authority?No
(2) Pending civil proceedings
- H(2)Are you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a civil proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of H(1)?No
Additional DRP filings 8 source blocks
Verbatim excerpts from supporting DRP filings, which may concern the firm or advisory affiliates. Amounts retain their filed labels; no total or attribution is inferred.
regulatory · block 1BMO NESBITT BURNS INC.PDF pages 64–66
- Advisory affiliate name — filed text
- BMO NESBITT BURNS INC.
- Regulator name — filed text
- INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 55,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Decision & Order of Offer of Settlement
Action status / disposition — filed text
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WHEREIN BMO NESBITT BURNS INC. ADMITTED THAT IT FAILED TO ADOPT ADEQUATE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES TO PREVENT THE SUBMISSION OF ERRONEOUS ORDERS INTO THE TMX MARKET ON CLOSE FACILITY.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
FAILURE TO ADOPT ADEQUATE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES TO PREVENT THE SUBMISSION OF ERRONEOUS ORDERS INTO THE TMX MARKET ON CLOSE FACILITY.
Sanction detail — filed text
TOTAL AMOUNT $50,000.00 PAID AS FINE AND $5,000.00 IN INVESTIGATION COST. THE FINE WAS PAID ON 04/17/12.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE CRD Number: This advisory affiliate is a Firm an Individual Registered: Yes No Name: BMO NESBITT BURNS INC. (For individuals, Last, First, Middle) This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA 2. Principal Sanction: Other Other Sanctions: WRITTEN AGREEMENT AND REPRIMAND 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 04/03/2012 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: NOT APPLICABLE 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): NOT APPLICABLE 6. Principal Product Type: Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock) Other Product Types: 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): FAILURE TO ADOPT ADEQUATE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES TO PREVENT THE SUBMISSION OF ERRONEOUS ORDERS INTO THE TMX MARKET ON CLOSE FACILITY. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Decision & Order of Offer of Settlement 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 04/04/2012 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 55,000.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: REPRIMAND Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: TOTAL AMOUNT $50,000.00 PAID AS FINE AND $5,000.00 IN INVESTIGATION COST. THE FINE WAS PAID ON 04/17/12. 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WHEREIN BMO NESBITT BURNS INC. ADMITTED THAT IT FAILED TO ADOPT ADEQUATE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES TO PREVENT THE SUBMISSION OF ERRONEOUS ORDERS INTO THE TMX MARKET ON CLOSE FACILITY.
regulatory · block 2PDF pages 66–68
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE CRD Number: This advisory affiliate is a Firm an Individual Registered: Yes No Name: BMO NESBITT BURNS INC. (For individuals, Last, First, Middle) This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) ONTARIO SECURITIES COMMISSION (THE "OSC") 2. Principal Sanction: Other Other Sanctions: NO SANCTIONS, PENALTIES OR FINES; THIS IS A NO CONTEST SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE OSC AND THE RIA AND THE LISTED ADVISORY AFFILIATES (COLLECTIVELY "BMO REGISTRANTS") PURSUANT TO WHICH THE BMO REGISTRANTS: -MAKE A VOLUNTARY PAYMENT OF $2,100,000 CDN TO THE OSC TO BE DESIGNATED BY THE OSC FOR ALLOCATION OR USE BY THE OSC; -MAKE A FURTHER VOLUNTARY PAYMENT OF $90,000 CDN TO THE OSC FOR COSTS INCURRED; -PROVIDE QUARTERLY REPORTS REGARDING PAYMENTS; -ATTESTATION LETTERS UPON COMPLETION OF THE PAYMENTS. 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 02/05/2015 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: N/A 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: Other Other Product Types: INVESTMENT PRODUCTS (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO MUTUAL FUNDS, PRINCIPAL PROTECTED NOTES AND PRINCIPAL AT RISK NOTES) AND STRUCTURED INVESTMENT PRODUCTS (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS AND CLOSED ENDED FUNDS). 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): IN ITS STATEMENT OF ALLEGATIONS, OSC STAFF ALLEGED TO THE OSC COMMISSION THAT THERE WERE INADEQUACIES IN THE BMO REGISTRANTS' SYSTEMS OF CONTROLS AND SUPERVISION WHICH FORMED PART OF THEIR COMPLIANCE SYSTEMS WHICH RESULTED IN CERTAIN CLIENTS OF THE BMO REGISTRANTS PAYING, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, EXCESS FEES THAT WERE NOT DETECTED OR CORRECTED BY THE BMO REGISTRANTS IN A TIMELY MANNER. AS THIS WAS A NO CONTEST SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, NO DETERMINATIONS WERE MADE REGARDING THE ALLEGATIONS. BMO AGREED TO MAKE THE PAYMENTS AND ISSUE THE REPORTS AND ATTESTATION LETTERS DESCRIBED ABOVE IN "PRINCIPAL SANCTION". 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Settled 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 12/15/2016 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: SEE DETAILS IN "PRINCIPAL SANCTION". Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: SEE DETAILS IN "PRINCIPAL SANCTION" AS WELL AS "DETAILS RELATED TO THE ACTION STATUS AND (OR) DISPOSITION", PART II, QUESTION 13. 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). THE BMO REGISTRANTS BEGAN TO MAKE PAYMENTS TO AFFECTED CLIENTS IN DECEMBER 2016 AND THIS PROCESS WILL CONTINUE INTO 2018, AS IT WILL TAKE SOME TIME TO COMPLETE, PARTICULARLY WITH RESPECT TO FORMER CLIENTS. ANY AMOUNTS THAT ARE NOT PAID TO CLIENTS OR PURSUANT TO UNCLAIMED PROPERTY LEGISLATION WILL BE PAID TO THE CANADIAN FOUNDATION FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATION NO LATER THAN DECEMBER 31, 2018.
regulatory · block 3PDF pages 68–70
- Regulator name — filed text
- FINRA
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 75,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Action status / disposition — filed text
SEE QUESTION 7 ABOVE.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS THAT IT INCORRECTLY CALCULATED ITS NET CAPITAL CAUSING IT NOT TO CONTINUOUSLY MAINTAIN ITS REQUIRED LEVEL OF NET CAPITAL. THE FINDINGS STATED THAT THE FIRM HAD A NET CAPITAL REQUIREMENT OF $250,000. THE FIRM COUNTED AS NET CAPITAL APPROXIMATELY $4 MILLION IN UNITED STATES TREASURY BILLS THAT WERE HELD IN TWO ACCOUNTS AT ANOTHER BANK. HOWEVER, THE ACCOUNT DOCUMENTS DID NOT SPECIFY THAT THE FIRM, AND NOT ITS ULTIMATE PARENT, A CANADIAN-BASED BANK (THE BANK), CONTROLLED THESE TWO ACCOUNTS, AND THEREFORE THESE ASSETS SHOULD HAVE BEEN DISALLOWED FROM THE NET CAPITAL CALCULATION. THE FIRM HAD A NET CAPITAL DEFICIENCY DURING EIGHT MONTHS RANGING FROM $26,815 TO $259,764. THE FINDINGS ALSO STATED THAT THE FIRM MAINTAINED TWO CHECKING ACCOUNTS WITH THE BANK. THE FIRM'S CASH BALANCE IN ITS ACCOUNTS WITH THE BANK EXCEEDED THE THREE-MONTH TRAILING AVERAGE OF ITS OPERATING EXPENSES. THAT OVERAGE SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN COUNTED AS AN ASSET FOR PURPOSES OF THE NET CAPITAL CALCULATION. THE FINDINGS ALSO INCLUDED THAT THE FIRM CREATED A NEW INTERNAL CONTROL PROCEDURE, A WORKSHEET THAT TRACKED CASH VERSUS THE TRAILING THREE-MONTH AVERAGE OF OPERATING EXPENSES. THE FIRM TRANSITIONED FROM A SELF-CLEARING BROKER TO AN INTRODUCING BROKER. AS AN INTRODUCING BROKER, THE FIRM NO LONGER HAD TO MAINTAIN CASH IN A RESERVE ACCOUNT WITH THE AMOUNT OWED TO CUSTOMERS. HOWEVER, AFTER TRANSITIONING TO AN INTRODUCING BROKER, THE FIRM FAILED TO TREAT THE FUNDS IN ITS RESERVE ACCOUNT AT THE BANK AS A NON-ALLOWABLE ASSET WHEN CALCULATING ITS NET CAPITAL. FINRA FOUND THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO REINVEST MATURING U.S. TREASURY BILLS HELD IN THAT RESERVE ACCOUNT. THE FIRM THEREFORE HELD CASH THAT WAS $1.77 MILLION IN EXCESS OF THE TRAILING THREE-MONTH AVERAGE OF ITS OPERATING EXPENSES AND IMPROPERLY IDENTIFIED AS AVAILABLE NET CAPITAL IN THE FIRM'S NET CAPITAL CALCULATION. FINRA ALSO FOUND THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO PREPARE AN ACCURATE COMPUTATION OF ITS NET CAPITAL AND FILED INACCURATE FOCUS REPORTS BECAUSE OF ITS ERRORS IN THE NET CAPITAL CALCULATION.
Sanction detail — filed text
THE FIRM WAS CENSURED AND FINED $75,000. FINES PAID IN FULL ON SEPTEMBER 27, 2018.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE No Information Filed This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) FINRA 2. Principal Sanction: Other Sanctions: 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 09/13/2018 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: 2016052541501 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: No Product Other Product Types: 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, THE FIRM CONSENTED TO THE SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS THAT IT INCORRECTLY CALCULATED ITS NET CAPITAL CAUSING IT NOT TO CONTINUOUSLY MAINTAIN ITS REQUIRED LEVEL OF NET CAPITAL. THE FINDINGS STATED THAT THE FIRM HAD A NET CAPITAL REQUIREMENT OF $250,000. THE FIRM COUNTED AS NET CAPITAL APPROXIMATELY $4 MILLION IN UNITED STATES TREASURY BILLS THAT WERE HELD IN TWO ACCOUNTS AT ANOTHER BANK. HOWEVER, THE ACCOUNT DOCUMENTS DID NOT SPECIFY THAT THE FIRM, AND NOT ITS ULTIMATE PARENT, A CANADIAN-BASED BANK (THE BANK), CONTROLLED THESE TWO ACCOUNTS, AND THEREFORE THESE ASSETS SHOULD HAVE BEEN DISALLOWED FROM THE NET CAPITAL CALCULATION. THE FIRM HAD A NET CAPITAL DEFICIENCY DURING EIGHT MONTHS RANGING FROM $26,815 TO $259,764. THE FINDINGS ALSO STATED THAT THE FIRM MAINTAINED TWO CHECKING ACCOUNTS WITH THE BANK. THE FIRM'S CASH BALANCE IN ITS ACCOUNTS WITH THE BANK EXCEEDED THE THREE-MONTH TRAILING AVERAGE OF ITS OPERATING EXPENSES. THAT OVERAGE SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN COUNTED AS AN ASSET FOR PURPOSES OF THE NET CAPITAL CALCULATION. THE FINDINGS ALSO INCLUDED THAT THE FIRM CREATED A NEW INTERNAL CONTROL PROCEDURE, A WORKSHEET THAT TRACKED CASH VERSUS THE TRAILING THREE-MONTH AVERAGE OF OPERATING EXPENSES. THE FIRM TRANSITIONED FROM A SELF-CLEARING BROKER TO AN INTRODUCING BROKER. AS AN INTRODUCING BROKER, THE FIRM NO LONGER HAD TO MAINTAIN CASH IN A RESERVE ACCOUNT WITH THE AMOUNT OWED TO CUSTOMERS. HOWEVER, AFTER TRANSITIONING TO AN INTRODUCING BROKER, THE FIRM FAILED TO TREAT THE FUNDS IN ITS RESERVE ACCOUNT AT THE BANK AS A NON-ALLOWABLE ASSET WHEN CALCULATING ITS NET CAPITAL. FINRA FOUND THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO REINVEST MATURING U.S. TREASURY BILLS HELD IN THAT RESERVE ACCOUNT. THE FIRM THEREFORE HELD CASH THAT WAS $1.77 MILLION IN EXCESS OF THE TRAILING THREE-MONTH AVERAGE OF ITS OPERATING EXPENSES AND IMPROPERLY IDENTIFIED AS AVAILABLE NET CAPITAL IN THE FIRM'S NET CAPITAL CALCULATION. FINRA ALSO FOUND THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO PREPARE AN ACCURATE COMPUTATION OF ITS NET CAPITAL AND FILED INACCURATE FOCUS REPORTS BECAUSE OF ITS ERRORS IN THE NET CAPITAL CALCULATION. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC) 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 09/13/2018 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 75,000.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: THE FIRM WAS CENSURED AND FINED $75,000. FINES PAID IN FULL ON SEPTEMBER 27, 2018. 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). SEE QUESTION 7 ABOVE.
regulatory · block 4BMO HARRIS FINANCIAL ADVISORS, INCPDF pages 70–72
- Advisory affiliate name — filed text
- BMO HARRIS FINANCIAL ADVISORS, INC
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE CRD Number: 137115 This advisory affiliate is a Firm an Individual Registered: Yes No Name: BMO HARRIS FINANCIAL ADVISORS, INC (For individuals, Last, First, Middle) This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 2. Principal Sanction: Other Sanctions: 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: Other Product Types: 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 5BMO NESBITT BURNS INCPDF pages 72–74
- Advisory affiliate name — filed text
- BMO NESBITT BURNS INC
- Regulator name — filed text
- INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 125,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Settled
Action status / disposition — filed text
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IN WHICH BMO NBI ADMITTED TO FAILING TO ADEQUATELY SUPERVISE THE ACTIVITIES OF AN REGISTRANT IN RELATION TO TWO CLIENT ACCOUNTS THAT INVOLVED HIGH NEW ISSUE COMMISSIONS AND HIGH TURNOVER RATIOS WHICH SHOULD HAVE RAISED SUITABILITY AND CONFLICT OF INTEREST CONCERNS.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
BETWEEN JANUARY 2011 AND MARCH 31, 2017, BMO NBI FAILED TO ADEQUATELY SUPERVISE THE ACTIVITIES OF AN RR IN RELATION TO THE ACCOUNTS BOTH ON THE TIER 1 AND TIER 2 COMPLIANCE LEVELS CONTRARY TO DEALER MEMBER RULES 38.1 AND 2500.
Sanction detail — filed text
A: MONETARY FINE $125,000; B: BMO NB PAID COSTS OF $15,000
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE CRD Number: This advisory affiliate is a Firm an Individual Registered: Yes No Name: BMO NESBITT BURNS INC (For individuals, Last, First, Middle) This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA 2. Principal Sanction: Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s) Other Sanctions: 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 10/04/2022 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): BMO NESBITT BURNS INC. 6. Principal Product Type: Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock) Other Product Types: 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): BETWEEN JANUARY 2011 AND MARCH 31, 2017, BMO NBI FAILED TO ADEQUATELY SUPERVISE THE ACTIVITIES OF AN RR IN RELATION TO THE ACCOUNTS BOTH ON THE TIER 1 AND TIER 2 COMPLIANCE LEVELS CONTRARY TO DEALER MEMBER RULES 38.1 AND 2500. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Settled 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 10/04/2022 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 125,000.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: BMO NB PAID COSTS OF $15,000 Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: A: MONETARY FINE $125,000; B: BMO NB PAID COSTS OF $15,000 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IN WHICH BMO NBI ADMITTED TO FAILING TO ADEQUATELY SUPERVISE THE ACTIVITIES OF AN REGISTRANT IN RELATION TO TWO CLIENT ACCOUNTS THAT INVOLVED HIGH NEW ISSUE COMMISSIONS AND HIGH TURNOVER RATIOS WHICH SHOULD HAVE RAISED SUITABILITY AND CONFLICT OF INTEREST CONCERNS.
regulatory · block 6BANK OF MONTREALPDF pages 74–76
- Advisory affiliate name — filed text
- BANK OF MONTREAL
- Regulator name — filed text
- CFTC - UNITED STATES COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 35,000,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Order
Action status / disposition — filed text
ON AUGUST 8, 2023, THE U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION ("CFTC") ALLEGED THAT BANK OF MONTREAL ("BMO") (I) FAILED TO KEEP CERTAIN REQUIRED RECORDS IN VIOLATION OF SECTIONS 4S(F)(1)(C) AND4S(G)(1) AND (3) OF THE COMMODITY EXCHANGE ACT ("CEA") AND CFTC REGULATIONS 23.201(A) AND 23.202(A)(1)AND (B)(1), (II) FAILED TO KEEP RECORDS IN THE MANNER REQUIRED BY CFTC REGULATION 1.31, AND (III) FAILED TO SUPERVISE ITS SWAP DEALER BUSINESS ACTIVITIES DILIGENTLY IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 4S(H)(1)(B) OF THE CEA AND CFTC REGULATION 23.602(A). BMO ADMITTED TO THE FACTS IN THE CFTC'S ORDER, ACKNOWLEDGED THAT ITS CONDUCT VIOLATED THE CEA AND CFTC REGULATIONS, AND AGREED TO (I) THE SERVICE OF THE CFTC'S ORDER;(II) CEASE AND DESIST FROM VIOLATING SECTIONS 4S(F)(1)(C), 4S(G)(1) AND (3), AND 4S(H)(1)(B) OF THE CEA AND CFTC REGULATIONS 1.31, 23.201(A), 23.202(A)(1) AND (B)(1), AND 23.602(A); (III) PAY A CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $35,000,000; AND (IV) COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
THE U.S. COMMODITY FUTURE TRADING COMMISSION ("CFTC") ALLEGED THAT, FROM AT LEAST 2019 THROUGH THE DATE OF THE ORDER, BANK OF MONTREAL ("BMO") (I) FAILED TO KEEP CERTAIN REQUIRED RECORDS IN VIOLATION OF SECTIONS 4S(F)(1)(C) AND 4S(G)(1) AND (3) OF THE COMMODITY EXCHANGE ACT ("CEA") AND CFTC REGULATIONS 23.201(A) AND 23.202(A)(1) AND (B)(1), (II) FAILED TO KEEP RECORDS IN THE MANNER REQUIRED BY CFTC REGULATION 1.31, AND (III) FAILED TO SUPERVISE ITS SWAP DEALER BUSINESS ACTIVITIES DILIGENTLY IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 4S(H)(1)(B) OF THE CEA AND CFTC REGULATION 23.602(A).
Sanction detail — filed text
BANK OF MONTREAL ("BMO") ADMITTED TO THE FACTS IN THE CFTC'S ORDER, ACKNOWLEDGED ITS CONDUCT VIOLATED THE COMMODITY EXCHANGE ACT ("CEA") AND CFTC REGULATIONS, AND AGREED TO (I) THE ENTRY OF THE CFTC'S FINDINGS; (II) CEASE AND DESIST FROM VIOLATING SECTIONS4S(F)(1)(C), 4S(G)(1) AND (3), AND 4S(H)(1)(B) OF THE CEA AND CFTC REGULATIONS 1.31, 23.201(A), 23.202(A)
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page.
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name).
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
BANK OF MONTREAL
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances:
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
Yes
No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1. Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC
Other Federal
State
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO)
CFTC - UNITED STATES COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions:
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY):
08/08/2023
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
23-24
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
BANK OF MONTREAL
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types:
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE U.S. COMMODITY FUTURE TRADING COMMISSION ("CFTC") ALLEGED THAT, FROM AT LEAST 2019 THROUGH THE DATE OF THE ORDER, BANK OF
MONTREAL ("BMO") (I) FAILED TO KEEP CERTAIN REQUIRED RECORDS IN VIOLATION OF SECTIONS 4S(F)(1)(C) AND 4S(G)(1) AND (3) OF THE
COMMODITY EXCHANGE ACT ("CEA") AND CFTC REGULATIONS 23.201(A) AND 23.202(A)(1) AND (B)(1), (II) FAILED TO KEEP RECORDS IN THE MANNER
REQUIRED BY CFTC REGULATION 1.31, AND (III) FAILED TO SUPERVISE ITS SWAP DEALER BUSINESS ACTIVITIES DILIGENTLY IN VIOLATION OF
SECTION 4S(H)(1)(B) OF THE CEA AND CFTC REGULATION 23.602(A).
8.
Current Status?
Pending
On Appeal
Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Order
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
08/08/2023
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 35,000,000.00
Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
Disgorgement/Restitution
Censure
Cease and Desist/Injunction
Bar
Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
UNDERTAKINGS
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived:
BANK OF MONTREAL ("BMO") ADMITTED TO THE FACTS IN THE CFTC'S ORDER, ACKNOWLEDGED ITS CONDUCT VIOLATED THE COMMODITY
EXCHANGE ACT ("CEA") AND CFTC REGULATIONS, AND AGREED TO (I) THE ENTRY OF THE CFTC'S FINDINGS; (II) CEASE AND DESIST FROM
VIOLATING SECTIONS4S(F)(1)(C), 4S(G)(1) AND (3), AND 4S(H)(1)(B) OF THE CEA AND CFTC REGULATIONS 1.31, 23.201(A), 23.202(A)
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
ON AUGUST 8, 2023, THE U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION ("CFTC") ALLEGED THAT BANK OF MONTREAL ("BMO") (I) FAILED TO KEEP
CERTAIN REQUIRED RECORDS IN VIOLATION OF SECTIONS 4S(F)(1)(C) AND4S(G)(1) AND (3) OF THE COMMODITY EXCHANGE ACT ("CEA") AND CFTC
REGULATIONS 23.201(A) AND 23.202(A)(1)AND (B)(1), (II) FAILED TO KEEP RECORDS IN THE MANNER REQUIRED BY CFTC REGULATION 1.31, AND (III)
FAILED TO SUPERVISE ITS SWAP DEALER BUSINESS ACTIVITIES DILIGENTLY IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 4S(H)(1)(B) OF THE CEA AND CFTC
REGULATION 23.602(A). BMO ADMITTED TO THE FACTS IN THE CFTC'S ORDER, ACKNOWLEDGED THAT ITS CONDUCT VIOLATED THE CEA AND CFTC
REGULATIONS, AND AGREED TO (I) THE SERVICE OF THE CFTC'S ORDER;(II) CEASE AND DESIST FROM VIOLATING SECTIONS 4S(F)(1)(C), 4S(G)(1) AND
(3), AND 4S(H)(1)(B) OF THE CEA AND CFTC REGULATIONS 1.31, 23.201(A), 23.202(A)(1) AND (B)(1), AND 23.602(A); (III) PAY A CIVIL MONETARY
PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $35,000,000; AND (IV) COMPLY WITH CERTAIN UNDERTAKINGS.Show 2 more source blocks
regulatory · block 7BMO NESBITT BURNS SECURITIES, INC.PDF pages 76–77
- Advisory affiliate name — filed text
- BMO NESBITT BURNS SECURITIES, INC.
- Regulator name — filed text
- CANADIAN INVESTMENT REGULATORY ORGANIZATION
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 1,696,876.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Settled
Action status / disposition — filed text
INFORMATION SUMMARIZED IN SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH CIRO. THE ACTIVITY IN QUESTION HAPPENED ONLY AT NESBITT BURNS, INC., THE REP IN QUESTION WAS NOT AFFILIATED WITH NBSL, AND NO NBSL CLIENTS WERE AFFECTED.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
BETWEEN DECEMBER 2017 AND MAY 2019, BMO NBI FAILED TO IMPLEMENT A SYSTEM OF SUPERVISION AND CONTROL IN RESPECT OF THE TRADING ACTIVITY (I.E. SHORT SELLING GOVERNMENT OF CANADA FIXED INCOME AND USING THE PROCEEDS TO INVEST IN PREFERRED SHARES) IN THE CLIENT ACCOUNTS, PARTICULARLY WITH RESPECT TO THE SUITABILITY OBLIGATIONS OWING BY IT AND ITS REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVE AND IN RESPECT OF THE SUPERVISION OF THE CLIENT ACCOUNTS, CONTRARY TO DEALER MEMBER RULES 38.1 AND 2500A.
Sanction detail — filed text
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WHERE BMO NBI AGREED TO VIOLATIONS OF CIRO DEALER MEMBER RULES 38.1 AND 2500A. FINE OF $1,500,000, DISGORGEMENT OF $146,876 AND COSTS OF $50,000.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE CRD Number: This advisory affiliate is a Firm an Individual Registered: Yes No Name: BMO NESBITT BURNS SECURITIES, INC. (For individuals, Last, First, Middle) This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) CANADIAN INVESTMENT REGULATORY ORGANIZATION 2. Principal Sanction: Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s) Other Sanctions: DISGORGEMENT 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 03/28/2024 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): BMO NESBITT BURNS SECURITIES, INC. 6. Principal Product Type: Debt - Government Other Product Types: PREFERRED SHARES 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): BETWEEN DECEMBER 2017 AND MAY 2019, BMO NBI FAILED TO IMPLEMENT A SYSTEM OF SUPERVISION AND CONTROL IN RESPECT OF THE TRADING ACTIVITY (I.E. SHORT SELLING GOVERNMENT OF CANADA FIXED INCOME AND USING THE PROCEEDS TO INVEST IN PREFERRED SHARES) IN THE CLIENT ACCOUNTS, PARTICULARLY WITH RESPECT TO THE SUITABILITY OBLIGATIONS OWING BY IT AND ITS REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVE AND IN RESPECT OF THE SUPERVISION OF THE CLIENT ACCOUNTS, CONTRARY TO DEALER MEMBER RULES 38.1 AND 2500A. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Settled 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 04/04/2024 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 1,696,876.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: COSTS Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WHERE BMO NBI AGREED TO VIOLATIONS OF CIRO DEALER MEMBER RULES 38.1 AND 2500A. FINE OF $1,500,000, DISGORGEMENT OF $146,876 AND COSTS OF $50,000. 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). INFORMATION SUMMARIZED IN SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH CIRO. THE ACTIVITY IN QUESTION HAPPENED ONLY AT NESBITT BURNS, INC., THE REP IN QUESTION WAS NOT AFFILIATED WITH NBSL, AND NO NBSL CLIENTS WERE AFFECTED.
regulatory · block 8NESBITT BURNS, INC.PDF pages 77–79
- Advisory affiliate name — filed text
- NESBITT BURNS, INC.
- Regulator name — filed text
- MONTREAL EXCHANGE, INC.
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 535,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Settled
Action status / disposition — filed text
SETTLED. FINE OF $510,000 CAD AND REIMBURSEMENT OF $25,000 CAD, PAYABLE WITHIN 30 DAYS.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
THE REGULATORY DIVISION OF BOURSE DE MONTRÉAL INC. (THE "BOURSE") FILED THE FOLLOWING DISCIPLINARY COMPLAINT AGAINST BMO NESBITT BURNS INC. (THE "RESPONDENT"), AN APPROVED PARTICIPANT. 1. ON MARCH 20, 2019, THE RESPONDENT CONTRAVENED ARTICLE 7.7 (CERTAIN ACTIVITIES AT THE CLOSE PROHIBITED) OF THE RULES OF THE BOURSE, BY ENTERING MULTIPLE SELL ORDERS WITHIN THE CLOSING PERIOD OF TRADING IN THE FIVE-YEAR GOVERNMENT OF CANADA BOND FUTURES EXPIRING ON MARCH 20, 2019 (CGFH19), FOR THE PURPOSE OF EFFECTING A LOW CLOSING PRICE IN A LISTED PRODUCT. 2. ON MARCH 20, 2019, THE RESPONDENT CONTRAVENED ARTICLE 3.101 (APPROVED PARTICIPANT'S SUPERVISORY RESPONSIBILITY) OF THE RULES OF THE BOURSE, BY FAILING TO ENSURE THAT ITS EMPLOYEES AND APPROVED PERSONS COMPLIED WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE REGULATIONS OF THE BOURSE. 3. FROM MARCH 1, 2019 TO AUGUST 16, 2022, THE RESPONDENT CONTRAVENED ARTICLES 3.4 (ACCESS TO ELECTRONIC TRADING SYSTEM) AND 3.400 (APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL) OF THE RULES OF THE BOURSE, BY PROVIDING ACCESS TO THE ELECTRONIC TRADING SYSTEM OF THE BOURSE TO ONE OF ITS EMPLOYEES WHO WAS NOT DULY APPROVED BY THE BOURSE. FOLLOWING A HEARING HELD ON MAY 6, 2026, A DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE DULY CONSTITUTED PURSUANT TO THE RULES OF THE BOURSE ACCEPTED THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT NEGOTIATED BETWEEN THE BOURSE AND THE RESPONDENT, WHICH INCLUDES A FINE TOTALING $510,000 AS WELL AS THE PAYMENT OF AN ADDITIONAL AMOUNT OF $25,000 AS REIMBURSEMENT OF THE RELATED COSTS OF THIS MATTER.
Sanction detail — filed text
FINE OF $510,000 CAD AND REIMBURSEMENT OF $25,000 CAD, PAYABLE WITHIN 30 DAYS
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE CRD Number: This advisory affiliate is a Firm an Individual Registered: Yes No Name: NESBITT BURNS, INC. (For individuals, Last, First, Middle) This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) MONTREAL EXCHANGE, INC. 2. Principal Sanction: Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s) Other Sanctions: 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 08/11/2026 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: MEA-24003 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): NESBITT BURNS, INC. 6. Principal Product Type: Futures - Financial Other Product Types: 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): THE REGULATORY DIVISION OF BOURSE DE MONTRÉAL INC. (THE "BOURSE") FILED THE FOLLOWING DISCIPLINARY COMPLAINT AGAINST BMO NESBITT BURNS INC. (THE "RESPONDENT"), AN APPROVED PARTICIPANT. 1. ON MARCH 20, 2019, THE RESPONDENT CONTRAVENED ARTICLE 7.7 (CERTAIN ACTIVITIES AT THE CLOSE PROHIBITED) OF THE RULES OF THE BOURSE, BY ENTERING MULTIPLE SELL ORDERS WITHIN THE CLOSING PERIOD OF TRADING IN THE FIVE-YEAR GOVERNMENT OF CANADA BOND FUTURES EXPIRING ON MARCH 20, 2019 (CGFH19), FOR THE PURPOSE OF EFFECTING A LOW CLOSING PRICE IN A LISTED PRODUCT. 2. ON MARCH 20, 2019, THE RESPONDENT CONTRAVENED ARTICLE 3.101 (APPROVED PARTICIPANT'S SUPERVISORY RESPONSIBILITY) OF THE RULES OF THE BOURSE, BY FAILING TO ENSURE THAT ITS EMPLOYEES AND APPROVED PERSONS COMPLIED WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE REGULATIONS OF THE BOURSE. 3. FROM MARCH 1, 2019 TO AUGUST 16, 2022, THE RESPONDENT CONTRAVENED ARTICLES 3.4 (ACCESS TO ELECTRONIC TRADING SYSTEM) AND 3.400 (APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL) OF THE RULES OF THE BOURSE, BY PROVIDING ACCESS TO THE ELECTRONIC TRADING SYSTEM OF THE BOURSE TO ONE OF ITS EMPLOYEES WHO WAS NOT DULY APPROVED BY THE BOURSE. FOLLOWING A HEARING HELD ON MAY 6, 2026, A DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE DULY CONSTITUTED PURSUANT TO THE RULES OF THE BOURSE ACCEPTED THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT NEGOTIATED BETWEEN THE BOURSE AND THE RESPONDENT, WHICH INCLUDES A FINE TOTALING $510,000 AS WELL AS THE PAYMENT OF AN ADDITIONAL AMOUNT OF $25,000 AS REIMBURSEMENT OF THE RELATED COSTS OF THIS MATTER. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Settled 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 08/11/2026 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 535,000.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: FINE OF $510,000 CAD AND REIMBURSEMENT OF $25,000 CAD, PAYABLE WITHIN 30 DAYS 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). SETTLED. FINE OF $510,000 CAD AND REIMBURSEMENT OF $25,000 CAD, PAYABLE WITHIN 30 DAYS.
* Metrics are based on the latest available data, including Form ADV filings, brochures, and relationship summaries pulled from the SEC IAPD, and may be subject to change. Learn what is included in the Rialytix data. Please refer to the firm's official disclosures for the most accurate information using their CRD number. This is not investment advice.