Firm profile

Raymond James (USA) Ltd.

VANCOUVER, CanadaCRD 25853Registration Status: ApprovedEffective since February 10, 2011SEC # 801-72137Latest ADV September 23, 2026

Raymond James (Usa) Ltd is an SEC registered investment adviser organized as a corporation with a primary office location in Vancouver, Canada. Its latest Form ADV filing, dated September 23, 2026, reports $2.0B in regulatory assets under management, 175 employees, 77 offices, and 4,869 accounts.

Assets Under Management
$2.0B
Employees
175
Offices
77 offices
Total Clients
4,864

Associated firm names

5 names listed
  • GOEPEL MCDERMID (USA) INC.
  • RAYMOND JAMES LTD (USA), INC.
  • RAYMOND JAMES (USA) LTD.
  • RAYMOND JAMES (USA) LTD

Leadership

3 roles identified
CEOSteven Robert Marcus
CCOHarris Ayyub
CFOChristopher John Lim

Advisory services offered

4 types reported
Financial Planning Services
Portfolio management for individuals and small businesses
Publication of periodicals or newsletters

Fee models offered

1 types reported
Asset based fees

Offices & Contact

Primary office

VANCOUVER, Canada

Loading map…

Primary office regionOther reported regions

Shading shows states and countries with reported offices. Cities are listed below; shading does not indicate service coverage.

Canada

VANCOUVERPrimary office · OSHAWA · BURLINGTON ONTARIO · MARKHAM · CALGARY · MEDICINE HAT · MONTREAL · KELOWNA · OAKVILLE · MONTREAL QUEBEC · CALGARY, ALBERTA · WATERLOO · PARKSVILLE · TORONTO · LANGLEY BC · ESSEX, ONTARIO · OTTAWA, ONTARIO · EXETER ONTARIO · COQUITLAM, BC · BURNABY, BC · REGINA SASKATCHEWAN · OKOTOKS, AB · DELTA, BC · TORONTO ON · NORTH YORK ON · MISSISSAUGA ON · BARRIE · EDMONTON · MISSISSAUGA · VICTORIA · VANCOUVER BC · TORONTO ONTARIO · NORTH VANCOUVER · MISSISSAUGA ONTARIO · ABBOTSFORD BC · LONDON ONTARIO · KELOWNA BC · BURLINGTON · SASKATOON SASKATCHEWAN · WINNIPEG · LANGLEY · ABBOTSFORD · VANCOUVER, BC · CALGARY, AB · KANATA · QUEBEC · NANAIMO · QUALICOM BEACH · BROOKLIN · KINGSTON · BURLINGTON ON · NEW MINAS NS · PENTICTON BC · BRAMPTON ONTARIO

73 office records listed · 77 total offices reported. Counts can use different reporting dates. SEC filers may list only their largest 25 additional offices.

Contact and digital presence

ADV profile links
Phone877-570-7558
WebsiteNot found
LinkedInNot found

Regulatory Assets Under Management Breakdown

Total regulatory assets under management$2.0Bas of September 23, 2026
Discretionary25.1%
$500M
25% of total RAUM25.1%
Non-discretionary74.9%
$1.5B
75% of total RAUM74.9%
Regulatory assets under management are split between discretionary and non-discretionary assets.

Client Coverage Demographics

Top client segmentIndividuals represent 92.5% of total clients.
Top client categories% of clientsClients
1
Individuals
92.5%
4,501
2
HNWI
7.2%
349
3
Corporations
0.2%
9
4
Pension Plans
0.1%
5

Assets under management Growth by Quarter

Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.

Total AUM$2.0B
Total Accounts4,869
10Y AUM Change+$1.9B (+1461.9%)

Private Funds

Private funds reported by Raymond James (USA) Ltd.

Loading private fund disclosures…

Employee Growth by Quarter

Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.

Total Employees175
Clients per Employee28:1
10Y Employee Change+110 (+169.2%)

Historical AUM and employee figures reflect available SEC Form ADV filings under this CRD. Filing gaps may reflect registration status changes, dormant periods, state registration periods, firm restructuring, or other reporting changes. Rialytix does not interpolate missing periods.


Ownership

Reported direct and indirect ownership ranges

Each range applies to a separate reported relationship and should not be added together.

Reported ownership ranges

Highlighted bands show the percentage range reported in Form ADV.

0%25%50%75%100%
RAYMOND JAMES LTD.Direct owner · Schedule AInterest in RAYMOND JAMES (USA) LTD
75%+
RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC.Indirect owner · Schedule BInterest in RAYMOND JAMES LTD.
75%+

Bars represent the reported range at that individual ownership step, not an estimated percentage of the advisory firm. Indirect relationships may refer to intermediate entities rather than directly to Raymond James (USA) Ltd..

Reported ownership and control details

Form ADV · Filing date 2026-09-23 · Schedules A and B

9 entries
#Owner / person & roleInterest in entityReported interestControl personTitle / status acquiredSource
1RAYMOND JAMES LTD.OWNERForeign entityRAYMOND JAMES (USA) LTD75% or moreCode EYesOWNER04/1998Schedule APDF page 78
2STEVEN ROBERT MARCUSDIRECTOR, PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERIndividualRAYMOND JAMES (USA) LTDLess than 5%Code NAYesDIRECTOR, PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER03/2019Schedule APDF page 78
3CHRISTOPHER JOHN LIMCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERIndividualRAYMOND JAMES (USA) LTDLess than 5%Code NAYesCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER12/2022Schedule APDF page 78
4SHAWN JOSEPH BARKODIRECTORIndividualRAYMOND JAMES (USA) LTDLess than 5%Code NAYesDIRECTOR09/2024Schedule APDF page 78
5PATRICIA BALEZENTISDIRECTORIndividualRAYMOND JAMES (USA) LTDLess than 5%Code NAYesDIRECTOR09/2024Schedule APDF page 78
6SEAN PATRICK BOYLEDIRECTORIndividualRAYMOND JAMES (USA) LTDLess than 5%Code NAYesDIRECTOR09/2024Schedule APDF page 78
7EFSTRATIOS MICHAEL SERBANOSGENERAL COUNSELIndividualRAYMOND JAMES (USA) LTDLess than 5%Code NAYesGENERAL COUNSEL09/2024Schedule APDF page 78
8HARRIS AYYUBSR. MANAGER & CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER (ACTING)IndividualRAYMOND JAMES (USA) LTDLess than 5%Code NAYesSR. MANAGER & CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER (ACTING)09/2025Schedule APDF page 78
9RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC.SHAREHOLDERDomestic entityRAYMOND JAMES LTD.75% or moreCode EYesSHAREHOLDER01/2001Schedule BPDF page 79

Less than 5% may include zero. Code F identifies a role without specifying a percentage. Reported interests may overlap and may not include every owner. Total indirect ownership is not calculated.

Compliance & Disclosures

Filing dated 9/23/2026 4:16:02 PM

Responses were selected by the RIA in its filing. Questions are shortened for readability; “you” refers to the reporting firm, and some questions also cover advisory affiliates.

RIA or supervised-person involvementThe RIA reported that none of the events below involve the firm or its supervised persons.RIA responseNo
AFelonies2 No

In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:

  • A1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a felony?No
  • A2Been charged with a felony?No
BMisdemeanors2 No

In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:

  • B1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a misdemeanor involving investments, an investment-related business, fraud, false statements or omissions, wrongful taking of property, bribery, perjury, forgery, counterfeiting, or extortion?No
  • B2Been charged with a misdemeanor of the kind listed above?No
CSEC or CFTC actions5 No

Has the SEC or CFTC ever:

  • C1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
  • C2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated SEC or CFTC regulations or statutes?No
  • C3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
  • C4Entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
  • C5Imposed a civil money penalty on you or an advisory affiliate, or ordered you or an advisory affiliate to cease and desist from any activity?No
DOther regulatory actions2 Yes3 No

Has any other federal regulatory agency, state regulatory agency, or foreign financial regulatory authority ever:

  • D1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission, or was dishonest, unfair, or unethical?No
  • D2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related regulations or statutes?Yes
  • D3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
  • D4In the past ten years, entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
  • D5Denied, suspended, or revoked your or an advisory affiliate’s registration or license, or otherwise prevented association with an investment-related business or restricted activities?Yes
ESelf-regulatory organization actions1 Yes3 No

Has a self-regulatory organization or commodities exchange ever:

  • E1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
  • E2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated its rules, other than a violation designated as a minor rule violation under an SEC-approved plan?Yes
  • E3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
  • E4Disciplined you or an advisory affiliate by expulsion, suspension, barring association with other members, or otherwise restricting activities?No
FProfessional authorizations1 No
  • FHas an authorization to act as an attorney, accountant, or federal contractor granted to you or an advisory affiliate ever been revoked or suspended?No
GPending regulatory proceedings1 No
  • GAre you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a regulatory proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of C, D, or E?No
HCivil judicial actions and proceedings4 No

(1) Court actions

Has a domestic or foreign court:

  • H(1)(a)In the past ten years, enjoined you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
  • H(1)(b)Found that you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related statutes or regulations?No
  • H(1)(c)Dismissed, pursuant to a settlement agreement, an investment-related civil action brought against you or an advisory affiliate by a state or foreign financial regulatory authority?No

(2) Pending civil proceedings

  • H(2)Are you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a civil proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of H(1)?No
Additional DRP filings 5 source blocks

Verbatim excerpts from supporting DRP filings, which may concern the firm or advisory affiliates. Amounts retain their filed labels; no total or attribution is inferred.

regulatory · block 1PDF pages 79–81
Regulator name — filed text
NASD
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 50,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE FIRM SIGNED THE LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT, ON APRIL 27TH, 2006 AND ACCEPTED BY NASD MAY 9TH, 2006. PAYMENT FOR $50,000 US WAS SUBMITTED BY CHEQUE ON MAY 12, 2006.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

SEC RULE 17A-4 REQUIRES THAT BROKERAGE FIRMS MAINTAIN AND PRESERVE, FOR A PERIOD OF NOT LESS THAN THREE YEARS, ELECTROIC COMMUNICATIONS RELATING TO THE FIRM'S BUSINESS AS A BROKER-DEALER. IN NOTICE TO MEMBERS 01-80 AMD 03-33, NASD COMMUNICATED TO MEMBERS THEIR RECORDKEEPING AND SUPERVISORY OBLIGATIONS WITH RESPECT TO ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS, INCLUDING E-MIAL AND INSTANT MESSAGING. FROM DECEMBER 2003 THROUGH APRIL 2005, RAYMOND JAMES LTD. STORED ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS ON VARIOUS COMPUTER SERVERS. ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS STORED ON CERTAIN OF THOSE SERVERS, HOWEVER, ARE NO LONGER RETRIEVABLE. AS A RESULT, THE FIRM DID NOT MAINTAIN AND PRESERVE ALL ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS AS REQUIRED BY SEC RULE 17A-4. THIS CONDUCT CONSTITUES SEPARATE AND DISTINCT VIOLATIONS OF SEC RULE 17A-4 AND NASD CONDUCT RULES 3110 AND 2110.

Sanction detail — filed text

THE FIRM WAS CENSURED AND FINED $50000.00. FIRM IS AWAITING PAYMENT ARRANGEMENTS OR PAYMENT DETAILS FORM THE NASD FINANCE DEPARTMENT. THE FIRM SIGNED THE LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT, ON APRIL 27TH, 2006 AND ACCEPTED BY NASD MAY 9TH, 2006. PAYMENT FOR $50,000 US WAS SUBMITTED BY CHEQUE ON MAY 12, 2006.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the

circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
NASD
2.
Principal Sanction:
Censure
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
04/12/2006
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
E112005000901
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
SEC RULE 17A-4 REQUIRES THAT BROKERAGE FIRMS MAINTAIN AND PRESERVE, FOR A PERIOD OF NOT LESS THAN THREE YEARS, ELECTROIC
COMMUNICATIONS RELATING TO THE FIRM'S BUSINESS AS A BROKER-DEALER. IN NOTICE TO MEMBERS 01-80 AMD 03-33, NASD COMMUNICATED TO
MEMBERS THEIR RECORDKEEPING AND SUPERVISORY OBLIGATIONS WITH RESPECT TO ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS, INCLUDING E-MIAL AND
INSTANT MESSAGING. FROM DECEMBER 2003 THROUGH APRIL 2005, RAYMOND JAMES LTD. STORED ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS ON VARIOUS
COMPUTER SERVERS. ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS STORED ON CERTAIN OF THOSE SERVERS, HOWEVER, ARE NO LONGER RETRIEVABLE. AS A
RESULT, THE FIRM DID NOT MAINTAIN AND PRESERVE ALL ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS AS REQUIRED BY SEC RULE 17A-4. THIS CONDUCT
CONSTITUES SEPARATE AND DISTINCT VIOLATIONS OF SEC RULE 17A-4 AND NASD CONDUCT RULES 3110 AND 2110.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
05/09/2006
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 50,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
SEC RULE 17A-7 UNDERTAKING - RECORDS OF NON-RESIDENT BROKER DEALERS UNDERTAKES TO FUNISH AT ITS OWN EXPENSE TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ("SEC") AT ITS PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN WASHINGTON, DC, OR AT ANY REGIONAL OR DISTRICT OFFICE

OF SAID COMMISSION, TRUE, CORRECT, COMPLETE AND CURRENT COPIES OF ANY OR ALL, OR ANY PART, OF THE BOOKS AND RECORDS WHICH
IS REQUIRED TO MAKE, KEEP CURRENT OR PRESERVE PURSUANT TO ANY PROVISION OF ANY RULE OR REGULATION OF THE SEC UNDER THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. THIS UNDERTAKING SHALL BE SUSPENDED DURING ANY PERIOD WHEN MAKING, KEEPING CURRENT,
AND PRESERVING COPIES OF ALL OF SAID BOOKS AND RECORDS AT A PLACE WITHIN THE UNITED STATES IN COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 17A-7
UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT.
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
THE FIRM WAS CENSURED AND FINED $50000.00. FIRM IS AWAITING PAYMENT ARRANGEMENTS OR PAYMENT DETAILS FORM THE NASD FINANCE
DEPARTMENT. THE FIRM SIGNED THE LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT, ON APRIL 27TH, 2006 AND ACCEPTED BY NASD MAY 9TH,
2006. PAYMENT FOR $50,000 US WAS SUBMITTED BY CHEQUE ON MAY 12, 2006.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE FIRM SIGNED THE LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT, ON APRIL 27TH, 2006 AND ACCEPTED BY NASD MAY 9TH, 2006. PAYMENT FOR
$50,000 US WAS SUBMITTED BY CHEQUE ON MAY 12, 2006.
regulatory · block 2DANIELAK, MARTIN, DOMINIKPDF pages 81–83
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
DANIELAK, MARTIN, DOMINIK
Regulator name — filed text
CANADIAN INVESTMENT REGULATORY ORGANIZATION (FORMERLY INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA (IIROC).
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 21,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Settled

Action status / disposition — filed text

IN 2023, MARTIN WAS FOUND GUILTY BY CIRO'S ENFORCEMENT DIVISION OF: A) ENTERING ORDERS FOR A SECURITY THAT HE OUGHT REASONABLY TO HAVE KNOWN WOULD CREATE, OR COULD REASONABLY BE EXPECTED TO CREATE, A FALSE OR MISLEADING APPEARANCE OF TRADING ACTIVITY OR INTEREST IN THE PURCHASE OR SALE OF THE SECURITY, CONTRARY TO CANADIAN SECURITIES REGULATIONS, AND B) USING OFF-CHANNEL COMMUNICATION (TEXT MESSAGING) TO COMMUNICATE WITH CLIENTS, CONTRARY TO THE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES OF THE BROKER-DEALER THAT HE WAS REGISTERED WITH AT THE TIME. BOTH AFOREMENTIONED OFFENSES OCCURRED IN OCT TO NOV 2019. AS SUCH, MARTIN WAS SANCTIONED BY CIRO WITH A FINE OF CAD $21,000 ($15,000+ USD), A TWO-MONTH SUSPENSION FROM THE CANADIAN MARKETPLACE, DISGORGEMENT OF COMMISSIONS AND PAYING BACK COSTS.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

BETWEEN OCTOBER 2019 AND NOVEMBER 2019, THE RESPONDENT ENTERED ORDERS FOR THE SHARES OF CITATION GROWTH CORP., THAT HE OUGHT REASONABLY TO HAVE KNOWN WOULD CREATE, OR COULD REASONABLY BE EXPECTED TO CREATE, A FALSE OR MISLEADING APPEARANCE OF TRADING ACTIVITY OR INTEREST IN THE PURCHASE OR SALE OF THE SECURITY, CONTRARY TO UMIR 2.2(2); AND (B) BETWEEN OCTOBER 2019 AND NOVEMBER 2019, THE RESPONDENT FAILED TO COMPLY WITH HIS DEALER MEMBER'S POLICIES AND PROCEDURES BY COMMUNICATING WITH HIS CLIENT BY WAY OF TEXT MESSAGES USING UNAPPROVED THIRD-PARTY COMMUNICATION APPLICATIONS, CONTRARY TO INVESTMENT DEALER RULE 1400

Sanction detail — filed text

2 MONTH SUSPENSION $105 DISGORGEMENT
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
8187890
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
DANIELAK, MARTIN, DOMINIK
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 

B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
CANADIAN INVESTMENT REGULATORY ORGANIZATION (FORMERLY INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA (IIROC).
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
05/16/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
RICHARDSON WEALTH
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
BETWEEN OCTOBER 2019 AND NOVEMBER 2019, THE RESPONDENT ENTERED ORDERS FOR THE SHARES OF CITATION GROWTH CORP., THAT HE OUGHT
REASONABLY TO HAVE KNOWN WOULD CREATE, OR COULD REASONABLY BE EXPECTED TO CREATE, A FALSE OR MISLEADING APPEARANCE OF TRADING
ACTIVITY OR INTEREST IN THE PURCHASE OR SALE OF THE SECURITY, CONTRARY TO UMIR 2.2(2); AND (B) BETWEEN OCTOBER 2019 AND NOVEMBER
2019, THE RESPONDENT FAILED TO COMPLY WITH HIS DEALER MEMBER'S POLICIES AND PROCEDURES BY COMMUNICATING WITH HIS CLIENT BY WAY
OF TEXT MESSAGES USING UNAPPROVED THIRD-PARTY COMMUNICATION APPLICATIONS, CONTRARY TO INVESTMENT DEALER RULE 1400
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Settled
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
04/10/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 21,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
RE-WRITE REGISTRATION COURSE
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 

2 MONTH SUSPENSION $105 DISGORGEMENT
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
IN 2023, MARTIN WAS FOUND GUILTY BY CIRO'S ENFORCEMENT DIVISION OF: A) ENTERING ORDERS FOR A SECURITY THAT HE OUGHT REASONABLY TO
HAVE KNOWN WOULD CREATE, OR COULD REASONABLY BE EXPECTED TO CREATE, A FALSE OR MISLEADING APPEARANCE OF TRADING ACTIVITY OR
INTEREST IN THE PURCHASE OR SALE OF THE SECURITY, CONTRARY TO CANADIAN SECURITIES REGULATIONS, AND B) USING OFF-CHANNEL
COMMUNICATION (TEXT MESSAGING) TO COMMUNICATE WITH CLIENTS, CONTRARY TO THE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES OF THE BROKER-DEALER THAT
HE WAS REGISTERED WITH AT THE TIME. BOTH AFOREMENTIONED OFFENSES OCCURRED IN OCT TO NOV 2019. AS SUCH, MARTIN WAS SANCTIONED
BY CIRO WITH A FINE OF CAD $21,000 ($15,000+ USD), A TWO-MONTH SUSPENSION FROM THE CANADIAN MARKETPLACE, DISGORGEMENT OF
COMMISSIONS AND PAYING BACK COSTS.
regulatory · block 3DANIELAK, MARTIN, DOMINIKPDF pages 83–85
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
DANIELAK, MARTIN, DOMINIK
Regulator name — filed text
CANADIAN INVESTMENT REGULATORY ORGANIZATION (CIRO), FORMERLY, INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA (IIROC)
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 15,468.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Settled

Action status / disposition — filed text

IN 2023, MARTIN WAS FOUND GUILTY BY CIRO'S ENFORCEMENT DIVISION OF: A) ENTERING ORDERS FOR A SECURITY THAT HE OUGHT REASONABLY TO HAVE KNOWN WOULD CREATE, OR COULD REASONABLY BE EXPECTED TO CREATE, A FALSE OR MISLEADING APPEARANCE OF TRADING ACTIVITY OR INTEREST IN THE PURCHASE OR SALE OF THE SECURITY, CONTRARY TO CANADIAN SECURITIES REGULATIONS, AND B) USING OFF-CHANNEL COMMUNICATION (TEXT MESSAGING) TO COMMUNICATE WITH CLIENTS, CONTRARY TO THE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES OF THE BROKER-DEALER THAT HE WAS REGISTERED WITH AT THE TIME. BOTH AFOREMENTIONED OFFENSES OCCURRED IN OCT TO NOV 2019. AS SUCH, MARTIN WAS SANCTIONED BY CIRO WITH A FINE OF CAD $21,000 ($15,000+ USD), A TWO-MONTH SUSPENSION FROM THE CANADIAN MARKETPLACE, DISGORGEMENT OF COMMISSIONS AND PAYING BACK COSTS.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

BETWEEN OCTOBER 2019 AND NOVEMBER 2019, THE RESPONDENT ENTERED ORDERS FOR THE SHARES OF CITATION GROWTH CORP., THAT HE OUGHT REASONABLY TO HAVE KNOWN WOULD CREATE, OR COULD REASONABLY BE EXPECTED TO CREATE, A FALSE OR MISLEADING APPEARANCE OF TRADING ACTIVITY OR INTEREST IN THE PURCHASE OR SALE OF THE SECURITY, CONTRARY TO UMIR 2.2(2); AND (B) BETWEEN OCTOBER 2019 AND NOVEMBER 2019, THE RESPONDENT FAILED TO COMPLY WITH HIS DEALER MEMBER'S POLICIES AND PROCEDURES BY COMMUNICATING WITH HIS CLIENT BY WAY OF TEXT MESSAGES USING UNAPPROVED THIRD-PARTY COMMUNICATION APPLICATIONS, CONTRARY TO INVESTMENT DEALER RULE 1400

Sanction detail — filed text

TWO MONTHS
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
8187890
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
DANIELAK, MARTIN, DOMINIK
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No

NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
CANADIAN INVESTMENT REGULATORY ORGANIZATION (CIRO), FORMERLY, INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA (IIROC)
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
05/16/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
RICHARDSON WEALTH
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
BETWEEN OCTOBER 2019 AND NOVEMBER 2019, THE RESPONDENT ENTERED ORDERS FOR THE SHARES OF CITATION GROWTH CORP., THAT HE OUGHT
REASONABLY TO HAVE KNOWN WOULD CREATE, OR COULD REASONABLY BE EXPECTED TO CREATE, A FALSE OR MISLEADING APPEARANCE OF TRADING
ACTIVITY OR INTEREST IN THE PURCHASE OR SALE OF THE SECURITY, CONTRARY TO UMIR 2.2(2); AND (B) BETWEEN OCTOBER 2019 AND NOVEMBER
2019, THE RESPONDENT FAILED TO COMPLY WITH HIS DEALER MEMBER'S POLICIES AND PROCEDURES BY COMMUNICATING WITH HIS CLIENT BY WAY
OF TEXT MESSAGES USING UNAPPROVED THIRD-PARTY COMMUNICATION APPLICATIONS, CONTRARY TO INVESTMENT DEALER RULE 1400
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Settled
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
04/10/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 15,468.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
ASKED TO REWRITE REGISTRATION COURSE.
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
TWO MONTHS
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
IN 2023, MARTIN WAS FOUND GUILTY BY CIRO'S ENFORCEMENT DIVISION OF: A) ENTERING ORDERS FOR A SECURITY THAT HE OUGHT REASONABLY TO

HAVE KNOWN WOULD CREATE, OR COULD REASONABLY BE EXPECTED TO CREATE, A FALSE OR MISLEADING APPEARANCE OF TRADING ACTIVITY OR
INTEREST IN THE PURCHASE OR SALE OF THE SECURITY, CONTRARY TO CANADIAN SECURITIES REGULATIONS, AND B) USING OFF-CHANNEL
COMMUNICATION (TEXT MESSAGING) TO COMMUNICATE WITH CLIENTS, CONTRARY TO THE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES OF THE BROKER-DEALER THAT
HE WAS REGISTERED WITH AT THE TIME. BOTH AFOREMENTIONED OFFENSES OCCURRED IN OCT TO NOV 2019. AS SUCH, MARTIN WAS SANCTIONED
BY CIRO WITH A FINE OF CAD $21,000 ($15,000+ USD), A TWO-MONTH SUSPENSION FROM THE CANADIAN MARKETPLACE, DISGORGEMENT OF
COMMISSIONS AND PAYING BACK COSTS.
regulatory · block 4PDF pages 85–86
Regulator name — filed text
NASD
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 50,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

SEC RULE 17A-4 REQUIRES THAT BROKERAGE FIRMS MAINTAIN AND PRESERVE, FOR A PERIOD OF NOT LESS THAN THREE YEARS, ELECTROIC COMMUNICATIONS RELATING TO THE FIRM'S BUSINESS AS A BROKER-DEALER. IN NOTICE TO MEMBERS 01-80 AMD 03-33, NASD COMMUNICATED TO MEMBERS THEIR RECORDKEEPING AND SUPERVISORY OBLIGATIONS WITH RESPECT TO ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS, INCLUDING E-MIAL AND INSTANT MESSAGING. FROM DECEMBER 2003 THROUGH APRIL 2005, RAYMOND JAMES LTD. STORED ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS ON VARIOUS COMPUTER SERVERS. ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS STORED ON CERTAIN OF THOSE SERVERS, HOWEVER, ARE NO LONGER RETRIEVABLE. AS A RESULT, THE FIRM DID NOT MAINTAIN AND PRESERVE ALL ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS AS REQUIRED BY SEC RULE 17A-4. THIS CONDUCT CONSTITUES SEPARATE AND DISTINCT VIOLATIONS OF SEC RULE 17A-4 AND NASD CONDUCT RULES 3110 AND 2110.

Sanction detail — filed text

THE FIRM WAS CENSURED AND FINED $50000.00. FIRM IS AWAITING PAYMENT ARRANGEMENTS OR PAYMENT DETAILS FORM THE NASD FINANCE DEPARTMENT. THE FIRM SIGNED THE LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT, ON APRIL 27TH, 2006 AND ACCEPTED BY NASD MAY 9TH, 2006. PAYMENT FOR $50,000 US WAS SUBMITTED BY CHEQUE ON MAY 12, 2006.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
NASD
2.
Principal Sanction:
Censure
Other Sanctions: 

3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
04/12/2006
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
E112005000901
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
SEC RULE 17A-4 REQUIRES THAT BROKERAGE FIRMS MAINTAIN AND PRESERVE, FOR A PERIOD OF NOT LESS THAN THREE YEARS, ELECTROIC
COMMUNICATIONS RELATING TO THE FIRM'S BUSINESS AS A BROKER-DEALER. IN NOTICE TO MEMBERS 01-80 AMD 03-33, NASD COMMUNICATED TO
MEMBERS THEIR RECORDKEEPING AND SUPERVISORY OBLIGATIONS WITH RESPECT TO ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS, INCLUDING E-MIAL AND
INSTANT MESSAGING. FROM DECEMBER 2003 THROUGH APRIL 2005, RAYMOND JAMES LTD. STORED ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS ON VARIOUS
COMPUTER SERVERS. ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS STORED ON CERTAIN OF THOSE SERVERS, HOWEVER, ARE NO LONGER RETRIEVABLE. AS A
RESULT, THE FIRM DID NOT MAINTAIN AND PRESERVE ALL ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS AS REQUIRED BY SEC RULE 17A-4. THIS CONDUCT
CONSTITUES SEPARATE AND DISTINCT VIOLATIONS OF SEC RULE 17A-4 AND NASD CONDUCT RULES 3110 AND 2110.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
05/09/2006
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 50,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
SEC RULE 17A-7 UNDERTAKING - RECORDS OF NON-RESIDENT BROKER DEALERS UNDERTAKES TO FUNISH AT ITS OWN EXPENSE TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ("SEC") AT ITS PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN WASHINGTON, DC, OR AT ANY REGIONAL OR DISTRICT OFFICE
OF SAID COMMISSION, TRUE, CORRECT, COMPLETE AND CURRENT COPIES OF ANY OR ALL, OR ANY PART, OF THE BOOKS AND RECORDS WHICH
IS REQUIRED TO MAKE, KEEP CURRENT OR PRESERVE PURSUANT TO ANY PROVISION OF ANY RULE OR REGULATION OF THE SEC UNDER THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. THIS UNDERTAKING SHALL BE SUSPENDED DURING ANY PERIOD WHEN MAKING, KEEPING CURRENT,
AND PRESERVING COPIES OF ALL OF SAID BOOKS AND RECORDS AT A PLACE WITHIN THE UNITED STATES IN COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 17A-7
UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT.
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
THE FIRM WAS CENSURED AND FINED $50000.00. FIRM IS AWAITING PAYMENT ARRANGEMENTS OR PAYMENT DETAILS FORM THE NASD FINANCE
DEPARTMENT. THE FIRM SIGNED THE LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT, ON APRIL 27TH, 2006 AND ACCEPTED BY NASD MAY 9TH,
2006. PAYMENT FOR $50,000 US WAS SUBMITTED BY CHEQUE ON MAY 12, 2006.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
regulatory · block 5RAYMOND JAMES LTD.PDF pages 87–88
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
RAYMOND JAMES LTD.
Regulator name — filed text
MARKET REGULATION SERVICES INC. (CANADA)
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 525,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Settled

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE DISPLINARY NOTICE HAS BEEN SETTLED AND NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN AS STATED ABOVE. TOTAL FINE PLUS COSTS OF $525,000.00
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN THE PERIOD FEBRUARY 2003 TO FEBRUARY 2005, RAYMOND JAMES LTD CONTRAVENED RS INC UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES ("UMIR") RELATING TO CLIENT PRIORITY, FAILURE TO RECORD CLIENT CONSENTORDER MAKINGAND AUDIT TRAIL ON NUMEROUS OCCASIONS. IN THE PERIOD JULY 2003 TO FEBRUARY 2005, RAYMOND JAMES LTD. FAILED TO COMPLY WITH ITS TRADING SUPERVISION OBLIGATIONS UNDER UMIR 7.1 (1) AND POLICY 7.1

Sanction detail — filed text

FINE OF $400,000.00 PAYABLE BY RAYMOND JAMES LTD TO MARKET REGULATION SERVICES INC. ("RS") COSTS OF $125,000.00 PAYABLE TO RS TOTAL FINE AND COSTS $525,000.00 AS INDICATED ABOVE
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
RAYMOND JAMES LTD.
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
MARKET REGULATION SERVICES INC. (CANADA)
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other
Other Sanctions: 
REGULATORY FINES
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 

04/27/2006
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
THIS IS THE DATE THAT NEGOTIATIONS COMMENCED WITH SRO TOWARDS A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT.
4.
Docket/Case Number:
NO 2006-006
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
RAYMOND JAMES LTD.
6.
Principal Product Type:
Money Market Fund(s)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN THE PERIOD FEBRUARY 2003 TO FEBRUARY 2005, RAYMOND JAMES LTD CONTRAVENED RS INC UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES ("UMIR")
RELATING TO CLIENT PRIORITY, FAILURE TO RECORD CLIENT CONSENTORDER MAKINGAND AUDIT TRAIL ON NUMEROUS OCCASIONS. IN THE PERIOD
JULY 2003 TO FEBRUARY 2005, RAYMOND JAMES LTD. FAILED TO COMPLY WITH ITS TRADING SUPERVISION OBLIGATIONS UNDER UMIR 7.1 (1) AND
POLICY 7.1
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Settled
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
06/30/2006
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 525,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
FINE OF $400,000.00 PAYABLE BY RAYMOND JAMES LTD TO MARKET REGULATION SERVICES INC. ("RS") COSTS OF $125,000.00 PAYABLE TO RS
TOTAL FINE AND COSTS $525,000.00 AS INDICATED ABOVE
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE DISPLINARY NOTICE HAS BEEN SETTLED AND NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN AS STATED ABOVE. TOTAL FINE PLUS COSTS OF $525,000.00

* Metrics are based on the latest available data, including Form ADV filings, brochures, and relationship summaries pulled from the SEC IAPD, and may be subject to change. Learn what is included in the Rialytix data. Please refer to the firm's official disclosures for the most accurate information using their CRD number. This is not investment advice.