Assets under management Growth by Quarter
Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.
Private Funds
Private funds reported by Raymond James (USA) Ltd.
Employee Growth by Quarter
Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.
Historical AUM and employee figures reflect available SEC Form ADV filings under this CRD. Filing gaps may reflect registration status changes, dormant periods, state registration periods, firm restructuring, or other reporting changes. Rialytix does not interpolate missing periods.
Ownership
Reported direct and indirect ownership ranges
Reported ownership ranges
Highlighted bands show the percentage range reported in Form ADV.
Bars represent the reported range at that individual ownership step, not an estimated percentage of the advisory firm. Indirect relationships may refer to intermediate entities rather than directly to Raymond James (USA) Ltd..
Reported ownership and control details
Form ADV · Filing date 2026-09-23 · Schedules A and B
| # | Owner / person & role | Interest in entity | Reported interest | Control person | Title / status acquired | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAYMOND JAMES LTD.OWNERForeign entity | RAYMOND JAMES (USA) LTD | 75% or moreCode E | Yes | OWNER04/1998 | Schedule APDF page 78 |
| 2 | STEVEN ROBERT MARCUSDIRECTOR, PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERIndividual | RAYMOND JAMES (USA) LTD | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | DIRECTOR, PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER03/2019 | Schedule APDF page 78 |
| 3 | CHRISTOPHER JOHN LIMCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERIndividual | RAYMOND JAMES (USA) LTD | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER12/2022 | Schedule APDF page 78 |
| 4 | SHAWN JOSEPH BARKODIRECTORIndividual | RAYMOND JAMES (USA) LTD | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | DIRECTOR09/2024 | Schedule APDF page 78 |
| 5 | PATRICIA BALEZENTISDIRECTORIndividual | RAYMOND JAMES (USA) LTD | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | DIRECTOR09/2024 | Schedule APDF page 78 |
| 6 | SEAN PATRICK BOYLEDIRECTORIndividual | RAYMOND JAMES (USA) LTD | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | DIRECTOR09/2024 | Schedule APDF page 78 |
| 7 | EFSTRATIOS MICHAEL SERBANOSGENERAL COUNSELIndividual | RAYMOND JAMES (USA) LTD | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | GENERAL COUNSEL09/2024 | Schedule APDF page 78 |
| 8 | HARRIS AYYUBSR. MANAGER & CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER (ACTING)Individual | RAYMOND JAMES (USA) LTD | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | SR. MANAGER & CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER (ACTING)09/2025 | Schedule APDF page 78 |
| 9 | RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL, INC.SHAREHOLDERDomestic entity | RAYMOND JAMES LTD. | 75% or moreCode E | Yes | SHAREHOLDER01/2001 | Schedule BPDF page 79 |
Less than 5% may include zero. Code F identifies a role without specifying a percentage. Reported interests may overlap and may not include every owner. Total indirect ownership is not calculated.
Compliance & Disclosures
Filing dated 9/23/2026 4:16:02 PM
Responses were selected by the RIA in its filing. Questions are shortened for readability; “you” refers to the reporting firm, and some questions also cover advisory affiliates.
AFelonies2 No
In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:
- A1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a felony?No
- A2Been charged with a felony?No
BMisdemeanors2 No
In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:
- B1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a misdemeanor involving investments, an investment-related business, fraud, false statements or omissions, wrongful taking of property, bribery, perjury, forgery, counterfeiting, or extortion?No
- B2Been charged with a misdemeanor of the kind listed above?No
CSEC or CFTC actions5 No
Has the SEC or CFTC ever:
- C1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
- C2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated SEC or CFTC regulations or statutes?No
- C3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- C4Entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
- C5Imposed a civil money penalty on you or an advisory affiliate, or ordered you or an advisory affiliate to cease and desist from any activity?No
DOther regulatory actions2 Yes3 No
Has any other federal regulatory agency, state regulatory agency, or foreign financial regulatory authority ever:
- D1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission, or was dishonest, unfair, or unethical?No
- D2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related regulations or statutes?Yes
- D3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- D4In the past ten years, entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
- D5Denied, suspended, or revoked your or an advisory affiliate’s registration or license, or otherwise prevented association with an investment-related business or restricted activities?Yes
ESelf-regulatory organization actions1 Yes3 No
Has a self-regulatory organization or commodities exchange ever:
- E1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
- E2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated its rules, other than a violation designated as a minor rule violation under an SEC-approved plan?Yes
- E3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- E4Disciplined you or an advisory affiliate by expulsion, suspension, barring association with other members, or otherwise restricting activities?No
FProfessional authorizations1 No
- FHas an authorization to act as an attorney, accountant, or federal contractor granted to you or an advisory affiliate ever been revoked or suspended?No
GPending regulatory proceedings1 No
- GAre you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a regulatory proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of C, D, or E?No
HCivil judicial actions and proceedings4 No
(1) Court actions
Has a domestic or foreign court:
- H(1)(a)In the past ten years, enjoined you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
- H(1)(b)Found that you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related statutes or regulations?No
- H(1)(c)Dismissed, pursuant to a settlement agreement, an investment-related civil action brought against you or an advisory affiliate by a state or foreign financial regulatory authority?No
(2) Pending civil proceedings
- H(2)Are you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a civil proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of H(1)?No
Additional DRP filings 5 source blocks
Verbatim excerpts from supporting DRP filings, which may concern the firm or advisory affiliates. Amounts retain their filed labels; no total or attribution is inferred.
regulatory · block 1PDF pages 79–81
- Regulator name — filed text
- NASD
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 50,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Action status / disposition — filed text
THE FIRM SIGNED THE LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT, ON APRIL 27TH, 2006 AND ACCEPTED BY NASD MAY 9TH, 2006. PAYMENT FOR $50,000 US WAS SUBMITTED BY CHEQUE ON MAY 12, 2006.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
SEC RULE 17A-4 REQUIRES THAT BROKERAGE FIRMS MAINTAIN AND PRESERVE, FOR A PERIOD OF NOT LESS THAN THREE YEARS, ELECTROIC COMMUNICATIONS RELATING TO THE FIRM'S BUSINESS AS A BROKER-DEALER. IN NOTICE TO MEMBERS 01-80 AMD 03-33, NASD COMMUNICATED TO MEMBERS THEIR RECORDKEEPING AND SUPERVISORY OBLIGATIONS WITH RESPECT TO ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS, INCLUDING E-MIAL AND INSTANT MESSAGING. FROM DECEMBER 2003 THROUGH APRIL 2005, RAYMOND JAMES LTD. STORED ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS ON VARIOUS COMPUTER SERVERS. ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS STORED ON CERTAIN OF THOSE SERVERS, HOWEVER, ARE NO LONGER RETRIEVABLE. AS A RESULT, THE FIRM DID NOT MAINTAIN AND PRESERVE ALL ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS AS REQUIRED BY SEC RULE 17A-4. THIS CONDUCT CONSTITUES SEPARATE AND DISTINCT VIOLATIONS OF SEC RULE 17A-4 AND NASD CONDUCT RULES 3110 AND 2110.
Sanction detail — filed text
THE FIRM WAS CENSURED AND FINED $50000.00. FIRM IS AWAITING PAYMENT ARRANGEMENTS OR PAYMENT DETAILS FORM THE NASD FINANCE DEPARTMENT. THE FIRM SIGNED THE LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT, ON APRIL 27TH, 2006 AND ACCEPTED BY NASD MAY 9TH, 2006. PAYMENT FOR $50,000 US WAS SUBMITTED BY CHEQUE ON MAY 12, 2006.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page.
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name).
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances:
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
Yes
No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1. Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC
Other Federal
State
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO)
NASD
2.
Principal Sanction:
Censure
Other Sanctions:
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY):
04/12/2006
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
E112005000901
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types:
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
SEC RULE 17A-4 REQUIRES THAT BROKERAGE FIRMS MAINTAIN AND PRESERVE, FOR A PERIOD OF NOT LESS THAN THREE YEARS, ELECTROIC
COMMUNICATIONS RELATING TO THE FIRM'S BUSINESS AS A BROKER-DEALER. IN NOTICE TO MEMBERS 01-80 AMD 03-33, NASD COMMUNICATED TO
MEMBERS THEIR RECORDKEEPING AND SUPERVISORY OBLIGATIONS WITH RESPECT TO ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS, INCLUDING E-MIAL AND
INSTANT MESSAGING. FROM DECEMBER 2003 THROUGH APRIL 2005, RAYMOND JAMES LTD. STORED ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS ON VARIOUS
COMPUTER SERVERS. ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS STORED ON CERTAIN OF THOSE SERVERS, HOWEVER, ARE NO LONGER RETRIEVABLE. AS A
RESULT, THE FIRM DID NOT MAINTAIN AND PRESERVE ALL ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS AS REQUIRED BY SEC RULE 17A-4. THIS CONDUCT
CONSTITUES SEPARATE AND DISTINCT VIOLATIONS OF SEC RULE 17A-4 AND NASD CONDUCT RULES 3110 AND 2110.
8.
Current Status?
Pending
On Appeal
Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
05/09/2006
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 50,000.00
Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
Disgorgement/Restitution
Censure
Cease and Desist/Injunction
Bar
Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
SEC RULE 17A-7 UNDERTAKING - RECORDS OF NON-RESIDENT BROKER DEALERS UNDERTAKES TO FUNISH AT ITS OWN EXPENSE TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ("SEC") AT ITS PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN WASHINGTON, DC, OR AT ANY REGIONAL OR DISTRICT OFFICE
OF SAID COMMISSION, TRUE, CORRECT, COMPLETE AND CURRENT COPIES OF ANY OR ALL, OR ANY PART, OF THE BOOKS AND RECORDS WHICH
IS REQUIRED TO MAKE, KEEP CURRENT OR PRESERVE PURSUANT TO ANY PROVISION OF ANY RULE OR REGULATION OF THE SEC UNDER THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. THIS UNDERTAKING SHALL BE SUSPENDED DURING ANY PERIOD WHEN MAKING, KEEPING CURRENT,
AND PRESERVING COPIES OF ALL OF SAID BOOKS AND RECORDS AT A PLACE WITHIN THE UNITED STATES IN COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 17A-7
UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT.
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived:
THE FIRM WAS CENSURED AND FINED $50000.00. FIRM IS AWAITING PAYMENT ARRANGEMENTS OR PAYMENT DETAILS FORM THE NASD FINANCE
DEPARTMENT. THE FIRM SIGNED THE LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT, ON APRIL 27TH, 2006 AND ACCEPTED BY NASD MAY 9TH,
2006. PAYMENT FOR $50,000 US WAS SUBMITTED BY CHEQUE ON MAY 12, 2006.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE FIRM SIGNED THE LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT, ON APRIL 27TH, 2006 AND ACCEPTED BY NASD MAY 9TH, 2006. PAYMENT FOR
$50,000 US WAS SUBMITTED BY CHEQUE ON MAY 12, 2006.regulatory · block 2DANIELAK, MARTIN, DOMINIKPDF pages 81–83
- Advisory affiliate name — filed text
- DANIELAK, MARTIN, DOMINIK
- Regulator name — filed text
- CANADIAN INVESTMENT REGULATORY ORGANIZATION (FORMERLY INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA (IIROC).
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 21,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Settled
Action status / disposition — filed text
IN 2023, MARTIN WAS FOUND GUILTY BY CIRO'S ENFORCEMENT DIVISION OF: A) ENTERING ORDERS FOR A SECURITY THAT HE OUGHT REASONABLY TO HAVE KNOWN WOULD CREATE, OR COULD REASONABLY BE EXPECTED TO CREATE, A FALSE OR MISLEADING APPEARANCE OF TRADING ACTIVITY OR INTEREST IN THE PURCHASE OR SALE OF THE SECURITY, CONTRARY TO CANADIAN SECURITIES REGULATIONS, AND B) USING OFF-CHANNEL COMMUNICATION (TEXT MESSAGING) TO COMMUNICATE WITH CLIENTS, CONTRARY TO THE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES OF THE BROKER-DEALER THAT HE WAS REGISTERED WITH AT THE TIME. BOTH AFOREMENTIONED OFFENSES OCCURRED IN OCT TO NOV 2019. AS SUCH, MARTIN WAS SANCTIONED BY CIRO WITH A FINE OF CAD $21,000 ($15,000+ USD), A TWO-MONTH SUSPENSION FROM THE CANADIAN MARKETPLACE, DISGORGEMENT OF COMMISSIONS AND PAYING BACK COSTS.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
BETWEEN OCTOBER 2019 AND NOVEMBER 2019, THE RESPONDENT ENTERED ORDERS FOR THE SHARES OF CITATION GROWTH CORP., THAT HE OUGHT REASONABLY TO HAVE KNOWN WOULD CREATE, OR COULD REASONABLY BE EXPECTED TO CREATE, A FALSE OR MISLEADING APPEARANCE OF TRADING ACTIVITY OR INTEREST IN THE PURCHASE OR SALE OF THE SECURITY, CONTRARY TO UMIR 2.2(2); AND (B) BETWEEN OCTOBER 2019 AND NOVEMBER 2019, THE RESPONDENT FAILED TO COMPLY WITH HIS DEALER MEMBER'S POLICIES AND PROCEDURES BY COMMUNICATING WITH HIS CLIENT BY WAY OF TEXT MESSAGES USING UNAPPROVED THIRD-PARTY COMMUNICATION APPLICATIONS, CONTRARY TO INVESTMENT DEALER RULE 1400
Sanction detail — filed text
2 MONTH SUSPENSION $105 DISGORGEMENT
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE CRD Number: 8187890 This advisory affiliate is a Firm an Individual Registered: Yes No Name: DANIELAK, MARTIN, DOMINIK (For individuals, Last, First, Middle) This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) CANADIAN INVESTMENT REGULATORY ORGANIZATION (FORMERLY INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA (IIROC). 2. Principal Sanction: Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s) Other Sanctions: 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 05/16/2023 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): RICHARDSON WEALTH 6. Principal Product Type: Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock) Other Product Types: 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): BETWEEN OCTOBER 2019 AND NOVEMBER 2019, THE RESPONDENT ENTERED ORDERS FOR THE SHARES OF CITATION GROWTH CORP., THAT HE OUGHT REASONABLY TO HAVE KNOWN WOULD CREATE, OR COULD REASONABLY BE EXPECTED TO CREATE, A FALSE OR MISLEADING APPEARANCE OF TRADING ACTIVITY OR INTEREST IN THE PURCHASE OR SALE OF THE SECURITY, CONTRARY TO UMIR 2.2(2); AND (B) BETWEEN OCTOBER 2019 AND NOVEMBER 2019, THE RESPONDENT FAILED TO COMPLY WITH HIS DEALER MEMBER'S POLICIES AND PROCEDURES BY COMMUNICATING WITH HIS CLIENT BY WAY OF TEXT MESSAGES USING UNAPPROVED THIRD-PARTY COMMUNICATION APPLICATIONS, CONTRARY TO INVESTMENT DEALER RULE 1400 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Settled 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 04/10/2023 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 21,000.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: RE-WRITE REGISTRATION COURSE Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: 2 MONTH SUSPENSION $105 DISGORGEMENT 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). IN 2023, MARTIN WAS FOUND GUILTY BY CIRO'S ENFORCEMENT DIVISION OF: A) ENTERING ORDERS FOR A SECURITY THAT HE OUGHT REASONABLY TO HAVE KNOWN WOULD CREATE, OR COULD REASONABLY BE EXPECTED TO CREATE, A FALSE OR MISLEADING APPEARANCE OF TRADING ACTIVITY OR INTEREST IN THE PURCHASE OR SALE OF THE SECURITY, CONTRARY TO CANADIAN SECURITIES REGULATIONS, AND B) USING OFF-CHANNEL COMMUNICATION (TEXT MESSAGING) TO COMMUNICATE WITH CLIENTS, CONTRARY TO THE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES OF THE BROKER-DEALER THAT HE WAS REGISTERED WITH AT THE TIME. BOTH AFOREMENTIONED OFFENSES OCCURRED IN OCT TO NOV 2019. AS SUCH, MARTIN WAS SANCTIONED BY CIRO WITH A FINE OF CAD $21,000 ($15,000+ USD), A TWO-MONTH SUSPENSION FROM THE CANADIAN MARKETPLACE, DISGORGEMENT OF COMMISSIONS AND PAYING BACK COSTS.
regulatory · block 3DANIELAK, MARTIN, DOMINIKPDF pages 83–85
- Advisory affiliate name — filed text
- DANIELAK, MARTIN, DOMINIK
- Regulator name — filed text
- CANADIAN INVESTMENT REGULATORY ORGANIZATION (CIRO), FORMERLY, INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA (IIROC)
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 15,468.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Settled
Action status / disposition — filed text
IN 2023, MARTIN WAS FOUND GUILTY BY CIRO'S ENFORCEMENT DIVISION OF: A) ENTERING ORDERS FOR A SECURITY THAT HE OUGHT REASONABLY TO HAVE KNOWN WOULD CREATE, OR COULD REASONABLY BE EXPECTED TO CREATE, A FALSE OR MISLEADING APPEARANCE OF TRADING ACTIVITY OR INTEREST IN THE PURCHASE OR SALE OF THE SECURITY, CONTRARY TO CANADIAN SECURITIES REGULATIONS, AND B) USING OFF-CHANNEL COMMUNICATION (TEXT MESSAGING) TO COMMUNICATE WITH CLIENTS, CONTRARY TO THE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES OF THE BROKER-DEALER THAT HE WAS REGISTERED WITH AT THE TIME. BOTH AFOREMENTIONED OFFENSES OCCURRED IN OCT TO NOV 2019. AS SUCH, MARTIN WAS SANCTIONED BY CIRO WITH A FINE OF CAD $21,000 ($15,000+ USD), A TWO-MONTH SUSPENSION FROM THE CANADIAN MARKETPLACE, DISGORGEMENT OF COMMISSIONS AND PAYING BACK COSTS.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
BETWEEN OCTOBER 2019 AND NOVEMBER 2019, THE RESPONDENT ENTERED ORDERS FOR THE SHARES OF CITATION GROWTH CORP., THAT HE OUGHT REASONABLY TO HAVE KNOWN WOULD CREATE, OR COULD REASONABLY BE EXPECTED TO CREATE, A FALSE OR MISLEADING APPEARANCE OF TRADING ACTIVITY OR INTEREST IN THE PURCHASE OR SALE OF THE SECURITY, CONTRARY TO UMIR 2.2(2); AND (B) BETWEEN OCTOBER 2019 AND NOVEMBER 2019, THE RESPONDENT FAILED TO COMPLY WITH HIS DEALER MEMBER'S POLICIES AND PROCEDURES BY COMMUNICATING WITH HIS CLIENT BY WAY OF TEXT MESSAGES USING UNAPPROVED THIRD-PARTY COMMUNICATION APPLICATIONS, CONTRARY TO INVESTMENT DEALER RULE 1400
Sanction detail — filed text
TWO MONTHS
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE CRD Number: 8187890 This advisory affiliate is a Firm an Individual Registered: Yes No Name: DANIELAK, MARTIN, DOMINIK (For individuals, Last, First, Middle) This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) CANADIAN INVESTMENT REGULATORY ORGANIZATION (CIRO), FORMERLY, INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA (IIROC) 2. Principal Sanction: Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s) Other Sanctions: 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 05/16/2023 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): RICHARDSON WEALTH 6. Principal Product Type: Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock) Other Product Types: 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): BETWEEN OCTOBER 2019 AND NOVEMBER 2019, THE RESPONDENT ENTERED ORDERS FOR THE SHARES OF CITATION GROWTH CORP., THAT HE OUGHT REASONABLY TO HAVE KNOWN WOULD CREATE, OR COULD REASONABLY BE EXPECTED TO CREATE, A FALSE OR MISLEADING APPEARANCE OF TRADING ACTIVITY OR INTEREST IN THE PURCHASE OR SALE OF THE SECURITY, CONTRARY TO UMIR 2.2(2); AND (B) BETWEEN OCTOBER 2019 AND NOVEMBER 2019, THE RESPONDENT FAILED TO COMPLY WITH HIS DEALER MEMBER'S POLICIES AND PROCEDURES BY COMMUNICATING WITH HIS CLIENT BY WAY OF TEXT MESSAGES USING UNAPPROVED THIRD-PARTY COMMUNICATION APPLICATIONS, CONTRARY TO INVESTMENT DEALER RULE 1400 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Settled 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 04/10/2023 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 15,468.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: ASKED TO REWRITE REGISTRATION COURSE. Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: TWO MONTHS 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). IN 2023, MARTIN WAS FOUND GUILTY BY CIRO'S ENFORCEMENT DIVISION OF: A) ENTERING ORDERS FOR A SECURITY THAT HE OUGHT REASONABLY TO HAVE KNOWN WOULD CREATE, OR COULD REASONABLY BE EXPECTED TO CREATE, A FALSE OR MISLEADING APPEARANCE OF TRADING ACTIVITY OR INTEREST IN THE PURCHASE OR SALE OF THE SECURITY, CONTRARY TO CANADIAN SECURITIES REGULATIONS, AND B) USING OFF-CHANNEL COMMUNICATION (TEXT MESSAGING) TO COMMUNICATE WITH CLIENTS, CONTRARY TO THE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES OF THE BROKER-DEALER THAT HE WAS REGISTERED WITH AT THE TIME. BOTH AFOREMENTIONED OFFENSES OCCURRED IN OCT TO NOV 2019. AS SUCH, MARTIN WAS SANCTIONED BY CIRO WITH A FINE OF CAD $21,000 ($15,000+ USD), A TWO-MONTH SUSPENSION FROM THE CANADIAN MARKETPLACE, DISGORGEMENT OF COMMISSIONS AND PAYING BACK COSTS.
regulatory · block 4PDF pages 85–86
- Regulator name — filed text
- NASD
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 50,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
SEC RULE 17A-4 REQUIRES THAT BROKERAGE FIRMS MAINTAIN AND PRESERVE, FOR A PERIOD OF NOT LESS THAN THREE YEARS, ELECTROIC COMMUNICATIONS RELATING TO THE FIRM'S BUSINESS AS A BROKER-DEALER. IN NOTICE TO MEMBERS 01-80 AMD 03-33, NASD COMMUNICATED TO MEMBERS THEIR RECORDKEEPING AND SUPERVISORY OBLIGATIONS WITH RESPECT TO ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS, INCLUDING E-MIAL AND INSTANT MESSAGING. FROM DECEMBER 2003 THROUGH APRIL 2005, RAYMOND JAMES LTD. STORED ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS ON VARIOUS COMPUTER SERVERS. ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS STORED ON CERTAIN OF THOSE SERVERS, HOWEVER, ARE NO LONGER RETRIEVABLE. AS A RESULT, THE FIRM DID NOT MAINTAIN AND PRESERVE ALL ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS AS REQUIRED BY SEC RULE 17A-4. THIS CONDUCT CONSTITUES SEPARATE AND DISTINCT VIOLATIONS OF SEC RULE 17A-4 AND NASD CONDUCT RULES 3110 AND 2110.
Sanction detail — filed text
THE FIRM WAS CENSURED AND FINED $50000.00. FIRM IS AWAITING PAYMENT ARRANGEMENTS OR PAYMENT DETAILS FORM THE NASD FINANCE DEPARTMENT. THE FIRM SIGNED THE LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT, ON APRIL 27TH, 2006 AND ACCEPTED BY NASD MAY 9TH, 2006. PAYMENT FOR $50,000 US WAS SUBMITTED BY CHEQUE ON MAY 12, 2006.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page.
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name).
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
No Information Filed
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances:
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
Yes
No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1. Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC
Other Federal
State
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO)
NASD
2.
Principal Sanction:
Censure
Other Sanctions:
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY):
04/12/2006
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
E112005000901
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types:
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
SEC RULE 17A-4 REQUIRES THAT BROKERAGE FIRMS MAINTAIN AND PRESERVE, FOR A PERIOD OF NOT LESS THAN THREE YEARS, ELECTROIC
COMMUNICATIONS RELATING TO THE FIRM'S BUSINESS AS A BROKER-DEALER. IN NOTICE TO MEMBERS 01-80 AMD 03-33, NASD COMMUNICATED TO
MEMBERS THEIR RECORDKEEPING AND SUPERVISORY OBLIGATIONS WITH RESPECT TO ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS, INCLUDING E-MIAL AND
INSTANT MESSAGING. FROM DECEMBER 2003 THROUGH APRIL 2005, RAYMOND JAMES LTD. STORED ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS ON VARIOUS
COMPUTER SERVERS. ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS STORED ON CERTAIN OF THOSE SERVERS, HOWEVER, ARE NO LONGER RETRIEVABLE. AS A
RESULT, THE FIRM DID NOT MAINTAIN AND PRESERVE ALL ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS AS REQUIRED BY SEC RULE 17A-4. THIS CONDUCT
CONSTITUES SEPARATE AND DISTINCT VIOLATIONS OF SEC RULE 17A-4 AND NASD CONDUCT RULES 3110 AND 2110.
8.
Current Status?
Pending
On Appeal
Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
05/09/2006
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 50,000.00
Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
Disgorgement/Restitution
Censure
Cease and Desist/Injunction
Bar
Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
SEC RULE 17A-7 UNDERTAKING - RECORDS OF NON-RESIDENT BROKER DEALERS UNDERTAKES TO FUNISH AT ITS OWN EXPENSE TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ("SEC") AT ITS PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN WASHINGTON, DC, OR AT ANY REGIONAL OR DISTRICT OFFICE
OF SAID COMMISSION, TRUE, CORRECT, COMPLETE AND CURRENT COPIES OF ANY OR ALL, OR ANY PART, OF THE BOOKS AND RECORDS WHICH
IS REQUIRED TO MAKE, KEEP CURRENT OR PRESERVE PURSUANT TO ANY PROVISION OF ANY RULE OR REGULATION OF THE SEC UNDER THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. THIS UNDERTAKING SHALL BE SUSPENDED DURING ANY PERIOD WHEN MAKING, KEEPING CURRENT,
AND PRESERVING COPIES OF ALL OF SAID BOOKS AND RECORDS AT A PLACE WITHIN THE UNITED STATES IN COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 17A-7
UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT.
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived:
THE FIRM WAS CENSURED AND FINED $50000.00. FIRM IS AWAITING PAYMENT ARRANGEMENTS OR PAYMENT DETAILS FORM THE NASD FINANCE
DEPARTMENT. THE FIRM SIGNED THE LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER AND CONSENT, ON APRIL 27TH, 2006 AND ACCEPTED BY NASD MAY 9TH,
2006. PAYMENT FOR $50,000 US WAS SUBMITTED BY CHEQUE ON MAY 12, 2006.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).regulatory · block 5RAYMOND JAMES LTD.PDF pages 87–88
- Advisory affiliate name — filed text
- RAYMOND JAMES LTD.
- Regulator name — filed text
- MARKET REGULATION SERVICES INC. (CANADA)
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 525,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Settled
Action status / disposition — filed text
THE DISPLINARY NOTICE HAS BEEN SETTLED AND NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN AS STATED ABOVE. TOTAL FINE PLUS COSTS OF $525,000.00
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
IN THE PERIOD FEBRUARY 2003 TO FEBRUARY 2005, RAYMOND JAMES LTD CONTRAVENED RS INC UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES ("UMIR") RELATING TO CLIENT PRIORITY, FAILURE TO RECORD CLIENT CONSENTORDER MAKINGAND AUDIT TRAIL ON NUMEROUS OCCASIONS. IN THE PERIOD JULY 2003 TO FEBRUARY 2005, RAYMOND JAMES LTD. FAILED TO COMPLY WITH ITS TRADING SUPERVISION OBLIGATIONS UNDER UMIR 7.1 (1) AND POLICY 7.1
Sanction detail — filed text
FINE OF $400,000.00 PAYABLE BY RAYMOND JAMES LTD TO MARKET REGULATION SERVICES INC. ("RS") COSTS OF $125,000.00 PAYABLE TO RS TOTAL FINE AND COSTS $525,000.00 AS INDICATED ABOVE
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page.
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name).
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
RAYMOND JAMES LTD.
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances:
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
Yes
No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1. Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC
Other Federal
State
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO)
MARKET REGULATION SERVICES INC. (CANADA)
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other
Other Sanctions:
REGULATORY FINES
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY):
04/27/2006
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
THIS IS THE DATE THAT NEGOTIATIONS COMMENCED WITH SRO TOWARDS A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT.
4.
Docket/Case Number:
NO 2006-006
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
RAYMOND JAMES LTD.
6.
Principal Product Type:
Money Market Fund(s)
Other Product Types:
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IN THE PERIOD FEBRUARY 2003 TO FEBRUARY 2005, RAYMOND JAMES LTD CONTRAVENED RS INC UNIVERSAL MARKET INTEGRITY RULES ("UMIR")
RELATING TO CLIENT PRIORITY, FAILURE TO RECORD CLIENT CONSENTORDER MAKINGAND AUDIT TRAIL ON NUMEROUS OCCASIONS. IN THE PERIOD
JULY 2003 TO FEBRUARY 2005, RAYMOND JAMES LTD. FAILED TO COMPLY WITH ITS TRADING SUPERVISION OBLIGATIONS UNDER UMIR 7.1 (1) AND
POLICY 7.1
8.
Current Status?
Pending
On Appeal
Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Settled
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
06/30/2006
Exact
Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 525,000.00
Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
Disgorgement/Restitution
Censure
Cease and Desist/Injunction
Bar
Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived:
FINE OF $400,000.00 PAYABLE BY RAYMOND JAMES LTD TO MARKET REGULATION SERVICES INC. ("RS") COSTS OF $125,000.00 PAYABLE TO RS
TOTAL FINE AND COSTS $525,000.00 AS INDICATED ABOVE
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE DISPLINARY NOTICE HAS BEEN SETTLED AND NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN AS STATED ABOVE. TOTAL FINE PLUS COSTS OF $525,000.00* Metrics are based on the latest available data, including Form ADV filings, brochures, and relationship summaries pulled from the SEC IAPD, and may be subject to change. Learn what is included in the Rialytix data. Please refer to the firm's official disclosures for the most accurate information using their CRD number. This is not investment advice.