Firm profile

Artemis Real Estate Partners

CHEVY CHASE, MDCRD 160668Registration Status: ApprovedEffective since March 30, 2012SEC # 801-74217Latest ADV March 31, 2026

Artemis Real Estate Partners is an SEC registered investment adviser organized as a limited liability company with a primary office location in Chevy Chase, MD. Its latest Form ADV filing, dated March 31, 2026, reports $11.4B in regulatory assets under management, 64 employees, 4 offices, and 31 accounts.

Assets Under Management
$11.4B
Employees
64
Offices
4 offices
Total Clients
30

Associated firm names

2 names listed
  • ARTEMIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS
  • ARTEMIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, LLC

Leadership

4 roles identified
CEOAlexander P. Gilbert
CEODeborah L. Harmon
CCOJames J. Hurley

Advisory services offered

2 types reported
Portfolio management for businesses
Portfolio management for pooled investment vehicles

Fee models offered

2 types reported
Asset based fees
Performance-based fees

Offices & Contact

Primary office

CHEVY CHASE, Maryland, United States

Loading map…

Primary office regionOther reported regions

Shading shows states and countries with reported offices. Cities are listed below; shading does not indicate service coverage.

Maryland

CHEVY CHASEPrimary office

California

LOS ANGELES

Georgia

ATLANTA

New York

NEW YORK

4 office records listed · 4 total offices reported. Counts can use different reporting dates. SEC filers may list only their largest 25 additional offices.

Contact and digital presence

ADV profile links

Regulatory Assets Under Management Breakdown

Total regulatory assets under management$11.4Bas of March 31, 2026
Discretionary74.4%
$8.5B
74% of total RAUM74.4%
Non-discretionary25.6%
$2.9B
26% of total RAUM25.6%
Regulatory assets under management are split between discretionary and non-discretionary assets.

Client Coverage Demographics

Top client segmentPooled Investment Vehicles represent 100.0% of total clients.
Top client categories% of clientsClients
1
Pooled Investment Vehicles
100.0%
30
Categories with <5 clients
State or municipal government entities (including govt. pension plans)<5 clients

Assets under management Growth by Quarter

Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.

Total AUM$11.4B
Total Accounts31
10Y AUM Change+$9.3B (+427.0%)

Private Funds

Private funds reported by Artemis Real Estate Partners

Loading private fund disclosures…

Employee Growth by Quarter

Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.

Total Employees64
Clients per Employee0:1
10Y Employee Change+36 (+128.6%)

Historical AUM and employee figures reflect available SEC Form ADV filings under this CRD. Filing gaps may reflect registration status changes, dormant periods, state registration periods, firm restructuring, or other reporting changes. Rialytix does not interpolate missing periods.


Ownership

Reported direct and indirect ownership ranges

Each range applies to a separate reported relationship and should not be added together.

Reported ownership ranges

Highlighted bands show the percentage range reported in Form ADV.

0%25%50%75%100%
BARINGS REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LLCDirect owner · Schedule AInterest in ARTEMIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS
75%+
BARINGS LLCIndirect owner · Schedule BInterest in BARINGS REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LLC
75%+
MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYIndirect owner · Schedule BInterest in MASSMUTUAL HOLDING LLC
75%+
MM ASSET MANAGEMENT HOLDING LLCIndirect owner · Schedule BInterest in BARINGS LLC
75%+
MASSMUTUAL HOLDING LLCIndirect owner · Schedule BInterest in MM ASSET MANAGEMENT HOLDING LLC
75%+

Bars represent the reported range at that individual ownership step, not an estimated percentage of the advisory firm. Indirect relationships may refer to intermediate entities rather than directly to Artemis Real Estate Partners.

Reported ownership and control details

Form ADV · Filing date 2026-03-31 · Schedules A and B

9 entries
#Owner / person & roleInterest in entityReported interestControl personTitle / status acquiredSource
1ALEXANDER PARISH GILBERTCO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERIndividualARTEMIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERSLess than 5%Code NAYesCO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER05/2022Schedule APDF page 196
2DEBORAH LYNN HARMONCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERIndividualARTEMIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERSLess than 5%Code NAYesCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER09/2009Schedule APDF page 196
3James J. HurleyCHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICERIndividualARTEMIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERSLess than 5%Code NAYesCHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER03/2019Schedule APDF page 196
4Chad PattersonCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERIndividualARTEMIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERSLess than 5%Code NAYesCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER08/2021Schedule APDF page 196
5BARINGS REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LLCMEMBERDomestic entityARTEMIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS75% or moreCode EYesMEMBER03/2025Schedule APDF page 196
6BARINGS LLCMEMBERDomestic entityBARINGS REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LLC75% or moreCode EYesMEMBER03/2025Schedule BPDF page 197
7MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYMEMBERDomestic entityMASSMUTUAL HOLDING LLC75% or moreCode EYesMEMBER07/2004Schedule BPDF page 197
8MM ASSET MANAGEMENT HOLDING LLCMEMBERDomestic entityBARINGS LLC75% or moreCode EYesMEMBER06/1995Schedule BPDF page 197
9MASSMUTUAL HOLDING LLCMEMBERDomestic entityMM ASSET MANAGEMENT HOLDING LLC75% or moreCode EYesMEMBER02/2012Schedule BPDF page 197

Less than 5% may include zero. Code F identifies a role without specifying a percentage. Reported interests may overlap and may not include every owner. Total indirect ownership is not calculated.

Compliance & Disclosures

Filing dated 3/31/2026 2:22:47 PM

Responses were selected by the RIA in its filing. Questions are shortened for readability; “you” refers to the reporting firm, and some questions also cover advisory affiliates.

RIA or supervised-person involvementThe RIA reported that none of the events below involve the firm or its supervised persons.RIA responseNo
AFelonies2 No

In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:

  • A1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a felony?No
  • A2Been charged with a felony?No
BMisdemeanors2 No

In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:

  • B1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a misdemeanor involving investments, an investment-related business, fraud, false statements or omissions, wrongful taking of property, bribery, perjury, forgery, counterfeiting, or extortion?No
  • B2Been charged with a misdemeanor of the kind listed above?No
CSEC or CFTC actions5 No

Has the SEC or CFTC ever:

  • C1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
  • C2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated SEC or CFTC regulations or statutes?No
  • C3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
  • C4Entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
  • C5Imposed a civil money penalty on you or an advisory affiliate, or ordered you or an advisory affiliate to cease and desist from any activity?No
DOther regulatory actions2 Yes3 No

Has any other federal regulatory agency, state regulatory agency, or foreign financial regulatory authority ever:

  • D1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission, or was dishonest, unfair, or unethical?No
  • D2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related regulations or statutes?Yes
  • D3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
  • D4In the past ten years, entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?Yes
  • D5Denied, suspended, or revoked your or an advisory affiliate’s registration or license, or otherwise prevented association with an investment-related business or restricted activities?No
ESelf-regulatory organization actions4 No

Has a self-regulatory organization or commodities exchange ever:

  • E1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
  • E2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated its rules, other than a violation designated as a minor rule violation under an SEC-approved plan?No
  • E3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
  • E4Disciplined you or an advisory affiliate by expulsion, suspension, barring association with other members, or otherwise restricting activities?No
FProfessional authorizations1 No
  • FHas an authorization to act as an attorney, accountant, or federal contractor granted to you or an advisory affiliate ever been revoked or suspended?No
GPending regulatory proceedings1 No
  • GAre you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a regulatory proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of C, D, or E?No
HCivil judicial actions and proceedings4 No

(1) Court actions

Has a domestic or foreign court:

  • H(1)(a)In the past ten years, enjoined you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
  • H(1)(b)Found that you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related statutes or regulations?No
  • H(1)(c)Dismissed, pursuant to a settlement agreement, an investment-related civil action brought against you or an advisory affiliate by a state or foreign financial regulatory authority?No

(2) Pending civil proceedings

  • H(2)Are you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a civil proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of H(1)?No
Additional DRP filings 4 source blocks

Verbatim excerpts from supporting DRP filings, which may concern the firm or advisory affiliates. Amounts retain their filed labels; no total or attribution is inferred.

regulatory · block 1MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURACE COMPANYPDF pages 202–204
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURACE COMPANY
Regulator name — filed text
MARYLAND INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 1,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Other

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE STATE OF MARYLAND DETERMINED THAT MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY ("MASSMUTUAL") VIOLATED THE CODE OF MARYLAND REGULATIONS ("COMAR") 31.09.15.11 AND THEREFORE SUBSECTION 4-113 OF THE INSURANCE ARTICLE BY FAILING TO SEND ANNUAL REPORTS TO AN INSURED IN 2020 AND 2021. THE ADMINISTRATION DID NOT FIND A VIOLATION BY MASSMUTUAL IN ITS OTHER ACTIONS COMPLAINED BY COMPLAINANT. THE MARYLAND INSURANCE COMMISSION ENTERED AN ORDER AGAINST MASSMUTUAL, AND WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THE ORDER, MASSMUTUAL WILL PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY OF $1,000.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IN 2003 THE INSURED PURCHASED A FLEXIBLE PREMIUM ADJUSTABLE LIFE INSURANCE POLICY WITH A FACE AMOUNT $500,000. IT WAS ALLEGED THAT MASSMUTUAL RAISED THE PREMIUMS AND CHANGED AND CANCELLED THE POLICY WITHOUT NOTIFYING THE INSURED. THE INSURED FURTHER ALLEDGED THAT THE AGENT DID NOT EXPLAIN THAT THE PREMIUM WOULD BE ADJUSTED ANNUALLY AND THAT THE AGENT MISREPRESENTED THE PRODUCT.

Sanction detail — filed text

THE MARYLAND INSURANCE COMMISSION ENTERED AN ORDER AGAINST MASSMUTUAL, AND WITHIN 30 DATS OF THE DATE OF ORDER, MASSMUTUAL WILL PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY OF $1,000.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 

One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE
INSURACE COMPANY
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
MARYLAND INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
04/12/2022
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
MIA-2023-04-018
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Insurance
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):

IN 2003 THE INSURED PURCHASED A FLEXIBLE PREMIUM ADJUSTABLE LIFE INSURANCE POLICY WITH A FACE AMOUNT $500,000. IT WAS ALLEGED
THAT MASSMUTUAL RAISED THE PREMIUMS AND CHANGED AND CANCELLED THE POLICY WITHOUT NOTIFYING THE INSURED. THE INSURED FURTHER
ALLEDGED THAT THE AGENT DID NOT EXPLAIN THAT THE PREMIUM WOULD BE ADJUSTED ANNUALLY AND THAT THE AGENT MISREPRESENTED THE
PRODUCT.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Other
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
04/26/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 1,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
THE MARYLAND INSURANCE COMMISSION ENTERED AN ORDER AGAINST MASSMUTUAL, AND WITHIN 30 DATS OF THE DATE OF ORDER,
MASSMUTUAL WILL PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY OF $1,000.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE STATE OF MARYLAND DETERMINED THAT MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY ("MASSMUTUAL") VIOLATED THE CODE OF
MARYLAND REGULATIONS ("COMAR") 31.09.15.11 AND THEREFORE SUBSECTION 4-113 OF THE INSURANCE ARTICLE BY FAILING TO SEND ANNUAL
REPORTS TO AN INSURED IN 2020 AND 2021. THE ADMINISTRATION DID NOT FIND A VIOLATION BY MASSMUTUAL IN ITS OTHER ACTIONS COMPLAINED
BY COMPLAINANT. THE MARYLAND INSURANCE COMMISSION ENTERED AN ORDER AGAINST MASSMUTUAL, AND WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THE
ORDER, MASSMUTUAL WILL PAY AN ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY OF $1,000.
regulatory · block 2MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYPDF pages 204–206
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Regulator name — filed text
STATE OF CONNECTICUT INSURANCE DEPARTMENT
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 61,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Stipulation and Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

DURING THE PERIOD UNDER EXAMINATION (JANUARY 1, 2014-DECEMBER 31, 2016), THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT INSURANCE DEPARTMENT ALLEGED THAT MASSMUTUAL, IN CERTAIN INSTANCES, FAILED TO FOLLOW ESTABLISHED PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS RESULTING IN: 35 PRODUCERS ACTING AS AGENTS WITHOUT BEING APPOINTED; 1 INSTANCE WHERE IT FAILED TO RETURN PREMIUM IN A TIMELY MANNER; 5 INSTANCES WHERE IT FAILED TO PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION FOR REGULATORY REVIEW; AND 1 INSTANCE WHERE IT FAILED TO RESPOND TIMELY TO A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR INFORMATION.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT INSURANCE DEPARTMENT CONDUCTED A MARKET CONDUCT EXAMINATION FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 2014 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2016 OF MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY ("MASSMUTUAL"). MASSMUTUAL IS THE PARENT OF MML INVESTMENT ADVISERS, LLC. AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE EXAMINATION, THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT INSURANCE DEPARTMENT ALLEGED THAT MASSMUTUAL VIOLATED SUBSECTIONS 38A-15 AND 38A-702M OF THE CONNECTICUT GENERAL STATUTES.

Sanction detail — filed text

MASSMUTUAL AGREED TO PROVIDE THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT INSURANCE DEPARTMENT WITH A SUMMARY OF ACTIONS TAKEN TO COMPLY WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE MARKET CONDUCT REPORT WITHIN 90 DAYS AND MASSMUTUAL AGREED TO PAY A FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $61,000.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)

You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE
INSURANCE COMPANY
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
STATE OF CONNECTICUT INSURANCE DEPARTMENT
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
10/03/2017
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
MC 18-87
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Insurance
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT INSURANCE DEPARTMENT CONDUCTED A MARKET CONDUCT EXAMINATION FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 2014 THROUGH
DECEMBER 31, 2016 OF MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY ("MASSMUTUAL"). MASSMUTUAL IS THE PARENT OF MML INVESTMENT
ADVISERS, LLC. AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE EXAMINATION, THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT INSURANCE DEPARTMENT ALLEGED THAT MASSMUTUAL
VIOLATED SUBSECTIONS 38A-15 AND 38A-702M OF THE CONNECTICUT GENERAL STATUTES.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final

9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Stipulation and Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
04/26/2019
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 61,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
MASSMUTUAL AGREED TO PROVIDE THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT INSURANCE DEPARTMENT WITH A SUMMARY OF ACTIONS TAKEN TO COMPLY
WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE MARKET CONDUCT REPORT WITHIN 90 DAYS AND MASSMUTUAL AGREED TO PAY A FINE IN THE AMOUNT
OF $61,000.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
DURING THE PERIOD UNDER EXAMINATION (JANUARY 1, 2014-DECEMBER 31, 2016), THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT INSURANCE DEPARTMENT ALLEGED
THAT MASSMUTUAL, IN CERTAIN INSTANCES, FAILED TO FOLLOW ESTABLISHED PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH
STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS RESULTING IN: 35 PRODUCERS ACTING AS AGENTS WITHOUT BEING APPOINTED; 1 INSTANCE WHERE IT FAILED TO
RETURN PREMIUM IN A TIMELY MANNER; 5 INSTANCES WHERE IT FAILED TO PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION FOR REGULATORY REVIEW; AND 1 INSTANCE
WHERE IT FAILED TO RESPOND TIMELY TO A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR INFORMATION.
regulatory · block 3MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYPDF pages 206–208
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Regulator name — filed text
STATE OF DELAWARE INSURANCE COMMISSIONER
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 133,500.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Stipulation and Consent

Action status / disposition — filed text

THE DEPARTMENT, THROUGH ITS EXAMINERS, CONDUCTED A TARGET MARKET CONDUCT EXAMINATION OF MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY'S AFFAIRS AND PRACTICES AS OF MARCH 31, 2024. THE DEPARTMENT PROVIDED MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY WITH A VERIFIED WRITTEN REPORT OF THE EXAMINATION AND MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY REVIEWED AND PROVIDED THE DEPARTMENT WITH COMMENTS ON THE EXAMINATION REPORT. THE DEPARTMENT THROUGH ITS EXAMINERS PREPARED A FINAL REPORT OF THE EXAMINATION DATED AS OF MARCH 31, 2024 (THE FINAL EXAMINATION REPORT). THE FINAL EXAMINATION REPORT CONCLUDED THAT MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY'S PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES DID NOT COMPLY WITH STATUTORY AND REGULATORY PROVISIONS. MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY ACCEPTED THE FINAL EXAMINATION REPORT AND WAIVED ANY RIGHT TO A HEARING AND AGREED THAT THE DEPARTMENT MAY FILE THE FINAL EXAMINATION REPORT WITHOUT ANY FURTHER MODIFICATIONS. MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY PAID AN ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY FOR THE VIOLATIONS IN THE AMOUNT OF $133,500.00 ON MAY 6, 2025. THE DEPARTMENT WILL POST A COPY OF THE FINAL EXAMINATION REPORT AND THE STIPULATION AND CONSENT ON THE DEPARTMENT'S PUBLIC WEBSITE. WITHIN 1 YEAR OF THE DATE OF THE FINAL EXAMINATION REPORT, THE DEPARTMENT MAY RE-EXAMINE THE EXCEPTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE FINAL EXAMINATION REPORT AND DETERMINE WHETHER THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS WERE APPROPRIATE, PROPERLY IMPLEMENTED AND EFFECTIVE.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

IT WAS ALLEGED THAT MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY'S PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES DID NOT COMPLY WITH STATUTORY AND REGULATORY PROVISIONS: 18 DEL ADMIN. C.§1203​4.0 LIFE INSURANCE SOLICITATION DEFINITIONS; 18 DEL. ADMIN C. §1204​5.2 DUTIES OF AGENTS AND BROKERS; 18 DEL. C. §1204.7.1 DUTIES OF INSURERS THAT USE AGENTS OR BROKERS; 18 DEL. ADMIN. C. §1204​7.4 STANDARDS FOR BASIC ILLUSTRATIONS.

Sanction detail — filed text

MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY PAID AN ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY OF $133,500.00 ON MAY 6, 2025. NO PORTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY WAS WAIVED.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.

ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE
INSURANCE COMPANY
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
STATE OF DELAWARE INSURANCE COMMISSIONER
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
03/31/2024
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
FINAL EXAMINATION REPORT
4.
Docket/Case Number:
DOCKET NO. 5635
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Insurance
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
IT WAS ALLEGED THAT MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY'S PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES DID NOT COMPLY WITH STATUTORY AND
REGULATORY PROVISIONS: 18 DEL ADMIN. C.§1203​4.0 LIFE INSURANCE SOLICITATION DEFINITIONS; 18 DEL. ADMIN C. §1204​5.2 DUTIES OF AGENTS
AND BROKERS; 18 DEL. C. §1204.7.1 DUTIES OF INSURERS THAT USE AGENTS OR BROKERS; 18 DEL. ADMIN. C. §1204​7.4 STANDARDS FOR BASIC
ILLUSTRATIONS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.

10. How was matter resolved:
Stipulation and Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
05/08/2025
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 133,500.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
RESPONDENT SHALL IMMEDIATELY IMPLEMENT CORRECTIVE ACTIONS FOR ANY AND ALL EXCEPTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS INCLUDED IN
THE FINAL EXAMINATION REPORT AND SHALL REPORT THE COMPLETION OF THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TO THE DEPARTMENT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF
THE DATE OF THE CONSENT ORDER.
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY PAID AN ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY OF $133,500.00 ON MAY 6, 2025. NO PORTION OF THE
ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY WAS WAIVED.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE DEPARTMENT, THROUGH ITS EXAMINERS, CONDUCTED A TARGET MARKET CONDUCT EXAMINATION OF MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY'S AFFAIRS AND PRACTICES AS OF MARCH 31, 2024. THE DEPARTMENT PROVIDED MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY WITH
A VERIFIED WRITTEN REPORT OF THE EXAMINATION AND MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY REVIEWED AND PROVIDED THE
DEPARTMENT WITH COMMENTS ON THE EXAMINATION REPORT. THE DEPARTMENT THROUGH ITS EXAMINERS PREPARED A FINAL REPORT OF THE
EXAMINATION DATED AS OF MARCH 31, 2024 (THE FINAL EXAMINATION REPORT). THE FINAL EXAMINATION REPORT CONCLUDED THAT
MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY'S PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES DID NOT COMPLY WITH STATUTORY AND REGULATORY
PROVISIONS. MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY ACCEPTED THE FINAL EXAMINATION REPORT AND WAIVED ANY RIGHT TO A
HEARING AND AGREED THAT THE DEPARTMENT MAY FILE THE FINAL EXAMINATION REPORT WITHOUT ANY FURTHER MODIFICATIONS. MASSACHUSETTS
MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY PAID AN ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY FOR THE VIOLATIONS IN THE AMOUNT OF $133,500.00 ON MAY 6, 2025. THE
DEPARTMENT WILL POST A COPY OF THE FINAL EXAMINATION REPORT AND THE STIPULATION AND CONSENT ON THE DEPARTMENT'S PUBLIC WEBSITE.
WITHIN 1 YEAR OF THE DATE OF THE FINAL EXAMINATION REPORT, THE DEPARTMENT MAY RE-EXAMINE THE EXCEPTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN
THE FINAL EXAMINATION REPORT AND DETERMINE WHETHER THE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS WERE APPROPRIATE, PROPERLY IMPLEMENTED AND
EFFECTIVE.
regulatory · block 4MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURACE COMPANYPDF pages 208–210
Advisory affiliate name — filed text
MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURACE COMPANY
Regulator name — filed text
STATE OF WASHINGTON OFFICE OF THE INSURANCE COMMISSIONER
Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
$ 10,000.00
How was matter resolved — filed text
Decision & Order of Offer of Settlement

Action status / disposition — filed text

MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY MUST CERTIFY ANNUALLY TO THE OFFICE OF THE INSURANCE COMMISSIONER ("OIC") THE INSURANCE PRODUCERS THAT ARE SELLING, SOLICITING OR NEGOTIATING THE COMPANY'S LONG TERM CARE ("LTC") INSURANCE PRODUCTS HAVE COMPLETED LTC REQUIREMENTS. THE CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED ANNUALLY TO THE OIC OR BEFORE MARCH 31ST. MASSACHUSETTS MUTUALS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY WAS GRANTED AN EXTENSION TO FILE ITS 2021 ANNUAL CERTIFICATION REPORT BY MAY 31, 2022. MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY SUBMITTED THE CERTIFICATION ON MAY 26, 2022, WHICH REVEALED THAT IT SELFDISCLOSED THAT TWO PRODUCERS SOLD THREE LTC POLICIES TO WASHINGTON CONSUMERS ON BEHALF OF THE COMPANY AND THE PRODUCERS WERE NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE LTC EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AT THE TIME OF THE SALES. RCW 48.83.130(4) REQUIRES ISSUERS TO OBTAIN VERIFICATION THAT A PRODUCER RECEIVES TRAINING BEFORE ETHE PRODUCERS IS PERMITTED TO SELL, SOLICIT OR NEGOTIATE THE ISSUER'S LTC INSURANCE PRODUCTS. WAC 284-17-262(1) PROVIDES THAT EACH ISSUER THAT HAS LTC POLICES APPROVED FOR SALE IN WA MUST CERTIFY ANNUAL THAT ALL OF ITS PRODUCERS HAVE (A) COMPLETED THE 8 HR. ONE TIME LTC EDUCATION TRAINING COURSE REQUIRED BY RCW 48.83.130(1)(A)(I) PRIOR TO SELLING, SOLICITING, OR NEGOTIATING THE COMPANY'S LTC COVERAGE IN WA; AND (B) IF DUE, COMPLETED THE REQUIRED 4 HOUR LTC CE REQUIREMENT IMPOSED BY RCS 48.83.130(2)(B). BY FAILING TO VERIFY THAT TWO PRODUCERS HAD RECEIVED THE REQUIRED LONG-TERM CARE TRAINING PRIOR TO SELLING, SOLICITING OR NEGOTIATING THE SALE OF THE COMPANY'S INSURANCE PRODUCTS, IT WAS ALLEGED THAT THE COMPANY HAS VIOLATED RCW 48.83.130(4) JUSTIFYING A FINE UNDER RCW 48.83.160. THE INSURANCE COMMISSIONER CONSENTED TO SETTLE THE MATTER IN CONSIDERATION OF THE COMPANY'S PAYMENT OF A FINE AND UPON SUCH TERMS AND CONDITIONS, INCLUDING (1) THE COMPANY ACKNOWLEDGES THE DUTY TO COMPLY FULLY WITH THE APPLICABLE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON; AND (2) THE COMPANY CONSENTED TO THE ENTRY OF THE ORDER. BY AGREEMENT, THE INSURANCE COMMISSIONER IMPOSED A FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $10,000 TO BE PAID WITHIN 30 DAYS.
Other filed details

Description of allegations — filed text

MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY MUST CERTIFY ANNUALLY TO THE OFFICE OF THE INSURANCE COMMISSIONER ("OIC") THE INSURANCE PRODUCERS THAT ARE SELLING, SOLICITING OR NEGOTIATING THE COMPANY'S LONG TERM CARE ("LTC") INSURANCE PRODUCTS HAVE COMPLETED LTS REQUIREMENTS. THE CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED ANNUALLY TO THE OIC OR BEFORE MARCH 31ST. MASSACHUSETTS MUTUALS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY WAS GRANTED AN EXTENSION TO FILE ITS 2021 ANNUAL CERTIFICATION REPORT BY MAY 31, 2022. THE STATE OF WASHINGTON OIC ALLEGED THAT MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY FAILED TO VERIFY THAT TWO INSURANCE PRODUCERS HAD RECEIVED THE REQUIRED LTC TRAINING BEFORE THEY WERE PERMITTED TO SELL, SOLICIT, OR OTHERWISE NEGOTIATE THE SALE OF THE COMPANY'S LTC INSURANCE PRODUCTS. BY FAILING TO VERIFY THE TRAINING, IT WAS ALLEGED THAT THE COMPANY VIOLATED RCW 48.83.130(4), JUSTIFYING THE IMPOSITION OF A FINE UNDER RCW 48.83.160.

Sanction detail — filed text

BY FAILING TO VERIFY THAT TWO INSURANCE PRODUCERS HAD RECEIVED THE REQUIRED LTC TRAINING BEFORE PERMITTING TO SELL, SOLICIT, OR OTHERWISE NEGOTIATE THE SALE OF THE COMPANY'S LTC INSURANCE PRODUCTS, THE COMPANY VIOLATED RCW 48.23.130(4), JUSTIFYING THE IMPOSITION OF A FINE OF $10,000 AGAINST MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY UNDER RCW 48.83.160. THE COMPANY HAS PAID THE FINE.
Full extracted filing text

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates

If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE
INSURACE COMPANY
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
STATE OF WASHINGTON OFFICE OF THE INSURANCE COMMISSIONER
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
05/26/2022
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
DATE OF 2021 ANNUAL CERTIFICATION PROVIDED TO THE OFFICE OF THE INSURANCE COMMISSIONER ON 5/26/2022, WITH AN EXPLANATION.
4.
Docket/Case Number:
23-0147
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
6.
Principal Product Type:
Insurance
Other Product Types: 
LONG TERM CARE
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY MUST CERTIFY ANNUALLY TO THE OFFICE OF THE INSURANCE COMMISSIONER ("OIC") THE
INSURANCE PRODUCERS THAT ARE SELLING, SOLICITING OR NEGOTIATING THE COMPANY'S LONG TERM CARE ("LTC") INSURANCE PRODUCTS HAVE
COMPLETED LTS REQUIREMENTS. THE CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED ANNUALLY TO THE OIC OR BEFORE MARCH 31ST.
MASSACHUSETTS MUTUALS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY WAS GRANTED AN EXTENSION TO FILE ITS 2021 ANNUAL CERTIFICATION REPORT BY MAY 31,
2022. THE STATE OF WASHINGTON OIC ALLEGED THAT MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY FAILED TO VERIFY THAT TWO INSURANCE
PRODUCERS HAD RECEIVED THE REQUIRED LTC TRAINING BEFORE THEY WERE PERMITTED TO SELL, SOLICIT, OR OTHERWISE NEGOTIATE THE SALE OF
THE COMPANY'S LTC INSURANCE PRODUCTS. BY FAILING TO VERIFY THE TRAINING, IT WAS ALLEGED THAT THE COMPANY VIOLATED RCW 48.83.130(4),
JUSTIFYING THE IMPOSITION OF A FINE UNDER RCW 48.83.160.

8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Decision & Order of Offer of Settlement
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
09/08/2023
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 10,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
THE COMPANY (MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY) ACKNOWLEDGED ITS DUTY TO COMPLY FULLY WITH THE APPLICABLE
LAWS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON AND CONSENTED TO THE ENTRY OF THE ORDER, WAIVED ANY AND ALL HEARING OR OTHER PROCEDURAL
RIGHTS, AND FURTHER ADMINISTRATIVE OR JUDICIAL CHALLENGES TO THE ORDER. BY AGREEMENT OF THE COMPANY AND THE INSURANCE
COMMISSIONER, A FINE OF $10,000 IS REQUIRED TO BE PAID WITHIN 30 DAYS. THE COMPANY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT ANY FURTHER
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE STATUTES AND/OR REGULATIONS THAT ARE THE SUBJECT OF THE ORDER WOULD CONSTITUTE GROUNDS FOR
FURTHER PENALTIES WHICH MAY BE IMPOSED IN DIRECT RESPONSE TO FURTHER VIOLATIONS.
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
BY FAILING TO VERIFY THAT TWO INSURANCE PRODUCERS HAD RECEIVED THE REQUIRED LTC TRAINING BEFORE PERMITTING TO SELL, SOLICIT,
OR OTHERWISE NEGOTIATE THE SALE OF THE COMPANY'S LTC INSURANCE PRODUCTS, THE COMPANY VIOLATED RCW 48.23.130(4), JUSTIFYING
THE IMPOSITION OF A FINE OF $10,000 AGAINST MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY UNDER RCW 48.83.160. THE COMPANY
HAS PAID THE FINE.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY MUST CERTIFY ANNUALLY TO THE OFFICE OF THE INSURANCE COMMISSIONER ("OIC") THE
INSURANCE PRODUCERS THAT ARE SELLING, SOLICITING OR NEGOTIATING THE COMPANY'S LONG TERM CARE ("LTC") INSURANCE PRODUCTS HAVE
COMPLETED LTC REQUIREMENTS. THE CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED ANNUALLY TO THE OIC OR BEFORE MARCH 31ST.
MASSACHUSETTS MUTUALS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY WAS GRANTED AN EXTENSION TO FILE ITS 2021 ANNUAL CERTIFICATION REPORT BY MAY 31,
2022. MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY SUBMITTED THE CERTIFICATION ON MAY 26, 2022, WHICH REVEALED THAT IT
SELFDISCLOSED THAT TWO PRODUCERS SOLD THREE LTC POLICIES TO WASHINGTON CONSUMERS ON BEHALF OF THE COMPANY AND THE
PRODUCERS WERE NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE LTC EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AT THE TIME OF THE SALES. RCW 48.83.130(4) REQUIRES
ISSUERS TO OBTAIN VERIFICATION THAT A PRODUCER RECEIVES TRAINING BEFORE ETHE PRODUCERS IS PERMITTED TO SELL, SOLICIT OR NEGOTIATE
THE ISSUER'S LTC INSURANCE PRODUCTS. WAC 284-17-262(1) PROVIDES THAT EACH ISSUER THAT HAS LTC POLICES APPROVED FOR SALE IN WA
MUST CERTIFY ANNUAL THAT ALL OF ITS PRODUCERS HAVE (A) COMPLETED THE 8 HR. ONE TIME LTC EDUCATION TRAINING COURSE REQUIRED BY RCW
48.83.130(1)(A)(I) PRIOR TO SELLING, SOLICITING, OR NEGOTIATING THE COMPANY'S LTC COVERAGE IN WA; AND (B) IF DUE, COMPLETED THE
REQUIRED 4 HOUR LTC CE REQUIREMENT IMPOSED BY RCS 48.83.130(2)(B). BY FAILING TO VERIFY THAT TWO PRODUCERS HAD RECEIVED THE
REQUIRED LONG-TERM CARE TRAINING PRIOR TO SELLING, SOLICITING OR NEGOTIATING THE SALE OF THE COMPANY'S INSURANCE PRODUCTS, IT
WAS ALLEGED THAT THE COMPANY HAS VIOLATED RCW 48.83.130(4) JUSTIFYING A FINE UNDER RCW 48.83.160. THE INSURANCE COMMISSIONER
CONSENTED TO SETTLE THE MATTER IN CONSIDERATION OF THE COMPANY'S PAYMENT OF A FINE AND UPON SUCH TERMS AND CONDITIONS,
INCLUDING (1) THE COMPANY ACKNOWLEDGES THE DUTY TO COMPLY FULLY WITH THE APPLICABLE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON; AND (2)
THE COMPANY CONSENTED TO THE ENTRY OF THE ORDER. BY AGREEMENT, THE INSURANCE COMMISSIONER IMPOSED A FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF
$10,000 TO BE PAID WITHIN 30 DAYS.

* Metrics are based on the latest available data, including Form ADV filings, brochures, and relationship summaries pulled from the SEC IAPD, and may be subject to change. Learn what is included in the Rialytix data. Please refer to the firm's official disclosures for the most accurate information using their CRD number. This is not investment advice.