Assets under management Growth by Quarter
Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.
Private Funds
Private funds reported by James I. Black & Company
Employee Growth by Quarter
Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.
Historical AUM and employee figures reflect available SEC Form ADV filings under this CRD. Filing gaps may reflect registration status changes, dormant periods, state registration periods, firm restructuring, or other reporting changes. Rialytix does not interpolate missing periods.
Ownership
Reported direct and indirect ownership ranges
Reported ownership ranges
Highlighted bands show the percentage range reported in Form ADV.
Bars represent the reported range at that individual ownership step, not an estimated percentage of the advisory firm. Indirect relationships may refer to intermediate entities rather than directly to James I. Black & Company.
No indirect ownership information reported in the source’s Schedule B.
Reported ownership and control details
Form ADV · Filing date 2026-02-06 · Schedules A and B
| # | Owner / person & role | Interest in entity | Reported interest | Control person | Title / status acquired | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GERALD LEROY BLACKPRESIDENT AND DIRECTORIndividual | JAMES I. BLACK & COMPANY | 25% to less than 50%Code C | Yes | PRESIDENT AND DIRECTOR11/2006 | Schedule APDF page 20 |
| 2 | DORIS BLACK LYONSTREASURERIndividual | JAMES I. BLACK & COMPANY | 10% to less than 25%Code B | No | TREASURER02/2008 | Schedule APDF page 20 |
| 3 | JAMES ISSAC III BLACKOWNERIndividual | JAMES I. BLACK & COMPANY | 10% to less than 25%Code B | No | OWNER02/2008 | Schedule APDF page 20 |
| 4 | REBECCA B CHARLESOWNERIndividual | JAMES I. BLACK & COMPANY | 10% to less than 25%Code B | No | OWNER02/2008 | Schedule APDF page 20 |
| 5 | NATASHA LYNN STEADMANCHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICERIndividual | JAMES I. BLACK & COMPANY | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER01/2011 | Schedule APDF page 20 |
| 6 | JEFFREY MILLER DEANDIRECTORIndividual | JAMES I. BLACK & COMPANY | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | DIRECTOR06/2011 | Schedule APDF page 20 |
| 7 | KATHARINE ANN BLACKOWNERIndividual | JAMES I. BLACK & COMPANY | 5% to less than 10%Code A | No | OWNER08/2014 | Schedule APDF page 20 |
| 8 | STEPHANIE MARIE BLACKOWNERIndividual | JAMES I. BLACK & COMPANY | 5% to less than 10%Code A | No | OWNER08/2014 | Schedule APDF page 20 |
| 9 | JENNIFER LEIGH BLACKOWNERIndividual | JAMES I. BLACK & COMPANY | 5% to less than 10%Code A | No | OWNER08/2014 | Schedule APDF page 20 |
Less than 5% may include zero. Code F identifies a role without specifying a percentage. Reported interests may overlap and may not include every owner. Total indirect ownership is not calculated.
Compliance & Disclosures
Filing dated 2/6/2026 11:22:12 AM
Responses were selected by the RIA in its filing. Questions are shortened for readability; “you” refers to the reporting firm, and some questions also cover advisory affiliates.
AFelonies2 No
In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:
- A1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a felony?No
- A2Been charged with a felony?No
BMisdemeanors2 No
In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:
- B1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a misdemeanor involving investments, an investment-related business, fraud, false statements or omissions, wrongful taking of property, bribery, perjury, forgery, counterfeiting, or extortion?No
- B2Been charged with a misdemeanor of the kind listed above?No
CSEC or CFTC actions3 Yes2 No
Has the SEC or CFTC ever:
- C1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
- C2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated SEC or CFTC regulations or statutes?Yes
- C3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- C4Entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?Yes
- C5Imposed a civil money penalty on you or an advisory affiliate, or ordered you or an advisory affiliate to cease and desist from any activity?Yes
DOther regulatory actions5 No
Has any other federal regulatory agency, state regulatory agency, or foreign financial regulatory authority ever:
- D1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission, or was dishonest, unfair, or unethical?No
- D2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related regulations or statutes?No
- D3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- D4In the past ten years, entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
- D5Denied, suspended, or revoked your or an advisory affiliate’s registration or license, or otherwise prevented association with an investment-related business or restricted activities?No
ESelf-regulatory organization actions1 Yes3 No
Has a self-regulatory organization or commodities exchange ever:
- E1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
- E2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated its rules, other than a violation designated as a minor rule violation under an SEC-approved plan?Yes
- E3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- E4Disciplined you or an advisory affiliate by expulsion, suspension, barring association with other members, or otherwise restricting activities?No
FProfessional authorizations1 No
- FHas an authorization to act as an attorney, accountant, or federal contractor granted to you or an advisory affiliate ever been revoked or suspended?No
GPending regulatory proceedings1 No
- GAre you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a regulatory proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of C, D, or E?No
HCivil judicial actions and proceedings4 No
(1) Court actions
Has a domestic or foreign court:
- H(1)(a)In the past ten years, enjoined you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
- H(1)(b)Found that you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related statutes or regulations?No
- H(1)(c)Dismissed, pursuant to a settlement agreement, an investment-related civil action brought against you or an advisory affiliate by a state or foreign financial regulatory authority?No
(2) Pending civil proceedings
- H(2)Are you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a civil proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of H(1)?No
Additional DRP filings 4 source blocks
Verbatim excerpts from supporting DRP filings, which may concern the firm or advisory affiliates. Amounts retain their filed labels; no total or attribution is inferred.
regulatory · block 1PDF pages 21–23
- Regulator name — filed text
- FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY (FINRA)
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 70,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Action status / disposition — filed text
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, JAMES I. BLACK & COMPANY CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS: THEREFORE THE FIRM IS CENSURED AND FINED $70,000 JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
THE FIRM VIOLATED SEC RULES 10B-10 , 10B-16, 17A-3(A)(9), 17A-3(A)(17), 17A-4, SECTIONS 220.4, 220.8 OF REGULATION T, NASD RULES 2110, 3010, 3110, IN THAT JAMES I. BLACK & COMPANY, ACTING THROUGH AN INDIVIDUAL: FAILED TO RETAIN THE FIRM'S INSTANT MESSAGES; AND FAILED TO ISSUE MARGIN CALLS WITH REGARD TO SECURITY TRANSACTIONS, FAILED TO OBTAIN PAYMENT BY THE REGULATION T DATE, AND TO OBTAIN REGULATION T EXTENSION REQUESTS, AND REGULATION T EXTENSION REQUESTS WITH REGARD TO TRANSACTIONS IN PUBLIC CUSTOMER CASH ACCOUNTS. THE FIRM FAILED TO IMPOSE A NINETY DAY FREEZE PERIOD ON SOME PUBLIC CUSTOMER CASH ACCOUNTS AND ALLOWED THESE PUBLIC CUSTOMERS TO EFFECT A PURCHASE OF SECURITIES. THE FIRM FAILED TO PROVIDE WRITTEN NOTIFICATION TO CUSTOMERS OF THE AMOUNT OF ANY REMUNERATION RECEIVED OR TO BE RECEIVED BY THE FIRM IN CONNECTION WITH TRANSACTIONS INVOLVING SHARES OF INVESTMENT COMPANIES AND FAILED TO ENSURE THAT FOR EACH ACCOUNT TO WHICH CREDIT HAD BEEN EXTENDED THAT SUCH ACCOUNT RECEIVED A WRITTEN STATEMENT DISCLOSING INTEREST PERIOD INFORMATION AND ANNUAL INTEREST RATE OR RATES OF INTEREST CHARGED INFORMATION, AS WELL AS, INFORMATION ON THE INTEREST CHARGE FOR EACH DIFFERENT ANNUAL RATE OF INTEREST. JAMES I. BLACK & COMPANY FAILED TO ENSURE THAT PUBLIC CUSTOMER NEW ACCOUNT FORMS CONTAINED ALL OR SOME OF THE NEEDED RELEVANT INFORMATION. THE FIRM FAILED TO ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN A SUPERVISORY SYSTEM, INCLUDING WRITTEN PROCEDURES, REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE SEC AND FINRA RULES.
Sanction detail — filed text
CASE RESOLVED BY ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER & CONSENT(AWC) ORDER - FINE AND EMPLOYEE SUSPENSION: EMPLOYEE (NON-INVESTMENT ADVISER AFFILIATE) SUSPENDED AS A SUPERVISOR AND PRINCIPAL FOR THREE MONTHS. JAMES I. BLACK AND JESS TUCKER WERE FINED, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, $70,000.00. FINE PAID IN FULL ON 10/16/2008.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE No Information Filed This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY (FINRA) 2. Principal Sanction: Censure Other Sanctions: MONETARY/FINE $70,000.00 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 10/10/2008 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: 2006003702701 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: Equity - OTC Other Product Types: LISTED EQUITIES, OPTIONS, AND DEBT SECURITIES. 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): THE FIRM VIOLATED SEC RULES 10B-10 , 10B-16, 17A-3(A)(9), 17A-3(A)(17), 17A-4, SECTIONS 220.4, 220.8 OF REGULATION T, NASD RULES 2110, 3010, 3110, IN THAT JAMES I. BLACK & COMPANY, ACTING THROUGH AN INDIVIDUAL: FAILED TO RETAIN THE FIRM'S INSTANT MESSAGES; AND FAILED TO ISSUE MARGIN CALLS WITH REGARD TO SECURITY TRANSACTIONS, FAILED TO OBTAIN PAYMENT BY THE REGULATION T DATE, AND TO OBTAIN REGULATION T EXTENSION REQUESTS, AND REGULATION T EXTENSION REQUESTS WITH REGARD TO TRANSACTIONS IN PUBLIC CUSTOMER CASH ACCOUNTS. THE FIRM FAILED TO IMPOSE A NINETY DAY FREEZE PERIOD ON SOME PUBLIC CUSTOMER CASH ACCOUNTS AND ALLOWED THESE PUBLIC CUSTOMERS TO EFFECT A PURCHASE OF SECURITIES. THE FIRM FAILED TO PROVIDE WRITTEN NOTIFICATION TO CUSTOMERS OF THE AMOUNT OF ANY REMUNERATION RECEIVED OR TO BE RECEIVED BY THE FIRM IN CONNECTION WITH TRANSACTIONS INVOLVING SHARES OF INVESTMENT COMPANIES AND FAILED TO ENSURE THAT FOR EACH ACCOUNT TO WHICH CREDIT HAD BEEN EXTENDED THAT SUCH ACCOUNT RECEIVED A WRITTEN STATEMENT DISCLOSING INTEREST PERIOD INFORMATION AND ANNUAL INTEREST RATE OR RATES OF INTEREST CHARGED INFORMATION, AS WELL AS, INFORMATION ON THE INTEREST CHARGE FOR EACH DIFFERENT ANNUAL RATE OF INTEREST. JAMES I. BLACK & COMPANY FAILED TO ENSURE THAT PUBLIC CUSTOMER NEW ACCOUNT FORMS CONTAINED ALL OR SOME OF THE NEEDED RELEVANT INFORMATION. THE FIRM FAILED TO ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN A SUPERVISORY SYSTEM, INCLUDING WRITTEN PROCEDURES, REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE SEC AND FINRA RULES. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC) 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 10/10/2008 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 70,000.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: AWC - FINE AND EMPLOYEE SUSPENSION Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: CASE RESOLVED BY ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER & CONSENT(AWC) ORDER - FINE AND EMPLOYEE SUSPENSION: EMPLOYEE (NON-INVESTMENT ADVISER AFFILIATE) SUSPENDED AS A SUPERVISOR AND PRINCIPAL FOR THREE MONTHS. JAMES I. BLACK AND JESS TUCKER WERE FINED, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, $70,000.00. FINE PAID IN FULL ON 10/16/2008. 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, JAMES I. BLACK & COMPANY CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS: THEREFORE THE FIRM IS CENSURED AND FINED $70,000 JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY.
regulatory · block 2PDF pages 23–25
- Regulator name — filed text
- NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITIES DEALERS (NASD)
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 6,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Action status / disposition — filed text
CASE RESOLVED ON 10/31/2005 BY ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER & CONSENT (AWC) ORDER AND MONETARY/FINE OF $6,000.00. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE ALLEGATIONS, RESPONDENT FIRM CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS; THEREFORE, FIRM IS CENSURED AND FINED $6,000.00. FAILED TO ACCEPT TRADES THROUGH NASDAQ ACT SYSTEM WITHIN TWENTY MINUTES. THE ORDER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINAL ORDER BASED ON VIOLATIONS OF ANY LAWS OR REGULATIONS THAT PROHIBIT FRAUDULENT, MANIPULATIVE, OR DECEPTIVE CONDUCT.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
THE FIRM VIOLATED NASD MARKETPLACE RULE 6130(B) AND NASD CONDUCT RULE 2110- RESPONDENT FIRM FAILED TO ACCEPT OR DECLINE IN NASDAQ MARKET CENTER 120 TRANSACTIONS IN ELIGIBLE SECURITIES WITHIN TWENTY MINUTES AFTER EXECUTION.
Sanction detail — filed text
WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE ALLEGATIONS, RESPONDENT FIRM CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS; THEREFORE, FIRM WAS CENSURED AND PAID $6,000.00 FINE.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE No Information Filed This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITIES DEALERS (NASD) 2. Principal Sanction: Censure Other Sanctions: MONITARY/FINE $6,000.00 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 10/31/2005 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: 20050002631-01 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: Other Other Product Types: UNSPECIFIED SECURITIES 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): THE FIRM VIOLATED NASD MARKETPLACE RULE 6130(B) AND NASD CONDUCT RULE 2110- RESPONDENT FIRM FAILED TO ACCEPT OR DECLINE IN NASDAQ MARKET CENTER 120 TRANSACTIONS IN ELIGIBLE SECURITIES WITHIN TWENTY MINUTES AFTER EXECUTION. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC) 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 10/31/2005 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 6,000.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE ALLEGATIONS, RESPONDENT FIRM CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS; THEREFORE, FIRM WAS CENSURED AND PAID $6,000.00 FINE. 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). CASE RESOLVED ON 10/31/2005 BY ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER & CONSENT (AWC) ORDER AND MONETARY/FINE OF $6,000.00. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE ALLEGATIONS, RESPONDENT FIRM CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTIONS AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS; THEREFORE, FIRM IS CENSURED AND FINED $6,000.00. FAILED TO ACCEPT TRADES THROUGH NASDAQ ACT SYSTEM WITHIN TWENTY MINUTES. THE ORDER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINAL ORDER BASED ON VIOLATIONS OF ANY LAWS OR REGULATIONS THAT PROHIBIT FRAUDULENT, MANIPULATIVE, OR DECEPTIVE CONDUCT.
regulatory · block 3PDF pages 25–27
- Regulator name — filed text
- FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY (FINRA)
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 125,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Action status / disposition — filed text
CASE RESOLVED ON 05/09/2008 BY ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER & CONSENT(AWC) ORDER OF CENSURE AND MONETARY/FINE $125,000.00 WITH UNDERTAKINGS. THE ORDER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINAL ORDER BASED ON VIOLATIONS OF ANY LAWS OR REGULATIONS THAT PROHIBIT FRAUDULENT, MANIPULATIVE, OR DECEPTIVE CONDUCT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, RESPONDENT MEMBER FIRM CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTION AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS; THEREFORE, FIRM IS CENSURED AND FINED $125,000 JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY AND REQUIRED TO HAVE ALL OF ITS PERSONNEL REGISTER FOR, WITHIN 60 DAYS, 16 HOURS OF TRAINING RE: ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING PROGRAM AND PROVIDE FINRA WITH EVIDENCE OF THE REGISTRATION WITHIN 10 DAYS OF REGISTRATION. THE FIRM'S PERSONNEL SHALL COMPLETE SUCH TRAINING WITHIN SIX MONTHS AND PROVIDE FINRA WITH EVIDENCE OF COMPLETION OF THE PROGRAM.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
THE FIRM VIOLATED NASD RULES 2110, 3011, 3011(A), (B), (C) AND (E), MSRB RULE G-41: THE FIRM PROCEDURES REQUIRED TO LOOK FOR SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITIES AND RED FLAGS AND TO NOTIFY REGULATORY ORGANIZATIONS AND/OR LAW ENFORCEMENT OF SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITIES BY FILING SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY REPORTS. HOWEVER, THE FIRM, ACTING THROUGH AN INDIVIDUAL, FAILED TO ADEQUATELY ENFORCE ITS OWN PROCEDURES OR OTHERWISE COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF NASD RULE 3011. THE FIRM, ACTING THROUGH AN INDIVIDUAL, FAILED TO ADEQUATELY IMPLEMENT ITS ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING COMPLIANCE PROGRAM (AML), IN THAT IT FAILED TO ADEQUATELY DETECT, INVESTIGATE, ANALYZE OR REPORT POTENTIALLY SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY; CONDUCT SUFFICIENT INDEPENDENT TESTS OF ITS AML PROGRAM ON AN ANNUAL BASIS AND CONDUCT ANNUAL AML TRAINING FOR ITS PERSONNEL. BY FAILING TO ADEQUATELY IMPLEMENT ITS AML COMPLIANCE PROGRAM, RESPONDENT PERMITTED THE STOCK PROMOTERS AND OTHER CUSTOMERS, SOME OF WHOM HAD REGULATORY AND/OR CRIMINAL HISTORIES, TO OPEN ACCOUNTS AT THE FIRM, IN WHICH THE STOCK CERTIFICATES FOLLOWED BY EITHER THIRD PARTY JOURNALS OR LIQUIDATIONS AND WIRES TO UNRELATED ACCOUNTS, ACTIVITY WHICH, WITHOUT ADDITIONAL EXPLANATION, MAY BE CONSISTENT WITH THE SALE OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES OR POSSIBLY MARKET MANIPULATION.
Sanction detail — filed text
JIB AND TUCKER WERE FINED, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, $125,000.00. 16 HOURS OF AML EMPLOYEE TRAINING FOR EACH EMPLOYEE TO BE COMPLETED WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE AWC DATE. FINE PAID ON OR ABOUT 6/3/2008 AND AML TRAINING REQUIREMENT HAS SINCE BEEN COMPLETED.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE No Information Filed This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY (FINRA) 2. Principal Sanction: Censure Other Sanctions: MONETARY/FINE $125,000.00 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 05/09/2008 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: 2006007424601 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: Equity - OTC Other Product Types: LISTED EQUITIES, OPTIONS, AND DEBT SECURITIES 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): THE FIRM VIOLATED NASD RULES 2110, 3011, 3011(A), (B), (C) AND (E), MSRB RULE G-41: THE FIRM PROCEDURES REQUIRED TO LOOK FOR SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITIES AND RED FLAGS AND TO NOTIFY REGULATORY ORGANIZATIONS AND/OR LAW ENFORCEMENT OF SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITIES BY FILING SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY REPORTS. HOWEVER, THE FIRM, ACTING THROUGH AN INDIVIDUAL, FAILED TO ADEQUATELY ENFORCE ITS OWN PROCEDURES OR OTHERWISE COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF NASD RULE 3011. THE FIRM, ACTING THROUGH AN INDIVIDUAL, FAILED TO ADEQUATELY IMPLEMENT ITS ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING COMPLIANCE PROGRAM (AML), IN THAT IT FAILED TO ADEQUATELY DETECT, INVESTIGATE, ANALYZE OR REPORT POTENTIALLY SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY; CONDUCT SUFFICIENT INDEPENDENT TESTS OF ITS AML PROGRAM ON AN ANNUAL BASIS AND CONDUCT ANNUAL AML TRAINING FOR ITS PERSONNEL. BY FAILING TO ADEQUATELY IMPLEMENT ITS AML COMPLIANCE PROGRAM, RESPONDENT PERMITTED THE STOCK PROMOTERS AND OTHER CUSTOMERS, SOME OF WHOM HAD REGULATORY AND/OR CRIMINAL HISTORIES, TO OPEN ACCOUNTS AT THE FIRM, IN WHICH THE STOCK CERTIFICATES FOLLOWED BY EITHER THIRD PARTY JOURNALS OR LIQUIDATIONS AND WIRES TO UNRELATED ACCOUNTS, ACTIVITY WHICH, WITHOUT ADDITIONAL EXPLANATION, MAY BE CONSISTENT WITH THE SALE OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES OR POSSIBLY MARKET MANIPULATION. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC) 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 05/09/2008 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 125,000.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: JESS TUCKER (NON-INVESTMENT RELATED AFFILIATE) SUSPENDED AS A SUPERVISOR AND PRINCIPAL FOR THREE MONTHS. EMPLOYEE TRAINING ON AML PRACTICES. Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: JIB AND TUCKER WERE FINED, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, $125,000.00. 16 HOURS OF AML EMPLOYEE TRAINING FOR EACH EMPLOYEE TO BE COMPLETED WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE AWC DATE. FINE PAID ON OR ABOUT 6/3/2008 AND AML TRAINING REQUIREMENT HAS SINCE BEEN COMPLETED. 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). CASE RESOLVED ON 05/09/2008 BY ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER & CONSENT(AWC) ORDER OF CENSURE AND MONETARY/FINE $125,000.00 WITH UNDERTAKINGS. THE ORDER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A FINAL ORDER BASED ON VIOLATIONS OF ANY LAWS OR REGULATIONS THAT PROHIBIT FRAUDULENT, MANIPULATIVE, OR DECEPTIVE CONDUCT. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE FINDINGS, RESPONDENT MEMBER FIRM CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTION AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS; THEREFORE, FIRM IS CENSURED AND FINED $125,000 JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY AND REQUIRED TO HAVE ALL OF ITS PERSONNEL REGISTER FOR, WITHIN 60 DAYS, 16 HOURS OF TRAINING RE: ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING PROGRAM AND PROVIDE FINRA WITH EVIDENCE OF THE REGISTRATION WITHIN 10 DAYS OF REGISTRATION. THE FIRM'S PERSONNEL SHALL COMPLETE SUCH TRAINING WITHIN SIX MONTHS AND PROVIDE FINRA WITH EVIDENCE OF COMPLETION OF THE PROGRAM.
regulatory · block 4PDF pages 27–29
- Regulator name — filed text
- FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY (FINRA)
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 70,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Action status / disposition — filed text
CASE RESOLVED BY ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER & CONSENT(AWC) ORDER FOR A MONETARY FINE OF $70,000 ON 10/10/2008. THE ORDER DID NOT CONSTITUTE FINAL ORDER BASED ON VIOLATIONS OF ANY LAWS OR REGULATIONS THAT PROHIBIT FRAUDULENT, MANIPULATIVE, OR DECEPTIVE CONDUCT MONETARY/FINE $70,000.00
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
THE FIRM VIOLATED SEC RULES 10B-10 , 10B-16, 17A-3(A)(9), 17A-3(A)(17), 17A-4, SECTIONS 220.4, 220.8 OF REGULATION T, NASD RULES 2110, 3010, 3110, IN THAT JAMES I. BLACK & COMPANY, ACTING THROUGH AN INDIVIDUAL: FAILED TO RETAIN THE FIRM'S INSTANT MESSAGES; AND FAILED TO ISSUE MARGIN CALLS WITH REGARD TO SECURITY TRANSACTIONS, FAILED TO OBTAIN PAYMENT BY THE REGULATION T DATE, AND TO OBTAIN REGULATION T EXTENSION REQUESTS, AND REGULATION T EXTENSION REQUESTS WITH REGARD TO TRANSACTIONS IN PUBLIC CUSTOMER CASH ACCOUNTS. THE FIRM FAILED TO IMPOSE A NINETY DAY FREEZE PERIOD ON SOME PUBLIC CUSTOMER CASH ACCOUNTS AND ALLOWED THESE PUBLIC CUSTOMERS TO EFFECT A PURCHASE OF SECURITIES. THE FIRM FAILED TO PROVIDE WRITTEN NOTIFICATION TO CUSTOMERS OF THE AMOUNT OF ANY REMUNERATION RECEIVED OR TO BE RECEIVED BY THE FIRM IN CONNECTION WITH TRANSACTIONS INVOLVING SHARES OF INVESTMENT COMPANIES AND FAILED TO ENSURE THAT FOR EACH ACCOUNT TO WHICH CREDIT HAD BEEN EXTENDED THAT SUCH ACCOUNT RECEIVED A WRITTEN STATEMENT DISCLOSING INTEREST PERIOD INFORMATION AND ANNUAL INTEREST RATE OR RATES OF INTEREST CHARGED INFORMATION, AS WELL AS, INFORMATION ON THE INTEREST CHARGE FOR EACH DIFFERENT ANNUAL RATE OF INTEREST. JAMES I. BLACK & COMPANY FAILED TO ENSURE THAT PUBLIC CUSTOMER NEW ACCOUNT FORMS CONTAINED ALL OR SOME OF THE NEEDED RELEVANT INFORMATION. THE FIRM FAILED TO ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN A SUPERVISORY SYSTEM, INCLUDING WRITTEN PROCEDURES, REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE SEC AND FINRA RULES.
Sanction detail — filed text
CASE RESOLVED BY ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER & CONSENT(AWC) ORDER - FINE AND EMPLOYEE SUSPENSION: EMPLOYEE (NON-INVESTMENT ADVISER AFFILIATE) SUSPENDED AS A SUPERVISOR AND PRINCIPAL FOR THREE MONTHS. JAMES I. BLACK AND JESS TUCKER WERE FINED, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, $70,000.00. FINE PAID IN FULL ON 10/16/2008.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE No Information Filed This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY (FINRA) 2. Principal Sanction: Censure Other Sanctions: MONETARY/FINE $70,000.00 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 10/10/2008 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: 2006003702701 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): 6. Principal Product Type: Equity - OTC Other Product Types: LISTED EQUITIES, OPTIONS, AND DEBT SECURITIES 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): THE FIRM VIOLATED SEC RULES 10B-10 , 10B-16, 17A-3(A)(9), 17A-3(A)(17), 17A-4, SECTIONS 220.4, 220.8 OF REGULATION T, NASD RULES 2110, 3010, 3110, IN THAT JAMES I. BLACK & COMPANY, ACTING THROUGH AN INDIVIDUAL: FAILED TO RETAIN THE FIRM'S INSTANT MESSAGES; AND FAILED TO ISSUE MARGIN CALLS WITH REGARD TO SECURITY TRANSACTIONS, FAILED TO OBTAIN PAYMENT BY THE REGULATION T DATE, AND TO OBTAIN REGULATION T EXTENSION REQUESTS, AND REGULATION T EXTENSION REQUESTS WITH REGARD TO TRANSACTIONS IN PUBLIC CUSTOMER CASH ACCOUNTS. THE FIRM FAILED TO IMPOSE A NINETY DAY FREEZE PERIOD ON SOME PUBLIC CUSTOMER CASH ACCOUNTS AND ALLOWED THESE PUBLIC CUSTOMERS TO EFFECT A PURCHASE OF SECURITIES. THE FIRM FAILED TO PROVIDE WRITTEN NOTIFICATION TO CUSTOMERS OF THE AMOUNT OF ANY REMUNERATION RECEIVED OR TO BE RECEIVED BY THE FIRM IN CONNECTION WITH TRANSACTIONS INVOLVING SHARES OF INVESTMENT COMPANIES AND FAILED TO ENSURE THAT FOR EACH ACCOUNT TO WHICH CREDIT HAD BEEN EXTENDED THAT SUCH ACCOUNT RECEIVED A WRITTEN STATEMENT DISCLOSING INTEREST PERIOD INFORMATION AND ANNUAL INTEREST RATE OR RATES OF INTEREST CHARGED INFORMATION, AS WELL AS, INFORMATION ON THE INTEREST CHARGE FOR EACH DIFFERENT ANNUAL RATE OF INTEREST. JAMES I. BLACK & COMPANY FAILED TO ENSURE THAT PUBLIC CUSTOMER NEW ACCOUNT FORMS CONTAINED ALL OR SOME OF THE NEEDED RELEVANT INFORMATION. THE FIRM FAILED TO ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN A SUPERVISORY SYSTEM, INCLUDING WRITTEN PROCEDURES, REASONABLY DESIGNED TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE SEC AND FINRA RULES. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC) 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 10/10/2008 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 70,000.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: AWC - FINE AND EMPLOYEE SUSPENSION Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: CASE RESOLVED BY ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER & CONSENT(AWC) ORDER - FINE AND EMPLOYEE SUSPENSION: EMPLOYEE (NON-INVESTMENT ADVISER AFFILIATE) SUSPENDED AS A SUPERVISOR AND PRINCIPAL FOR THREE MONTHS. JAMES I. BLACK AND JESS TUCKER WERE FINED, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, $70,000.00. FINE PAID IN FULL ON 10/16/2008. 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). CASE RESOLVED BY ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER & CONSENT(AWC) ORDER FOR A MONETARY FINE OF $70,000 ON 10/10/2008. THE ORDER DID NOT CONSTITUTE FINAL ORDER BASED ON VIOLATIONS OF ANY LAWS OR REGULATIONS THAT PROHIBIT FRAUDULENT, MANIPULATIVE, OR DECEPTIVE CONDUCT MONETARY/FINE $70,000.00
* Metrics are based on the latest available data, including Form ADV filings, brochures, and relationship summaries pulled from the SEC IAPD, and may be subject to change. Learn what is included in the Rialytix data. Please refer to the firm's official disclosures for the most accurate information using their CRD number. This is not investment advice.