Walter Scott & Partners Limited

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
THE BANK OF NEW YORK
MELLON CORPORATION
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.

 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Cease and Desist
Other Sanctions: 
CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTIES, DISGORGEMENT AND PREJUDGMENT INTEREST.
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
08/18/2015
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
SEC RELEASE NO. 34-75720; ACCOUNTING & AUDIT ENFORCEMENT RELEASE NO. 3679; ADMIN PROCEEDING FILE NO. 3-16762
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
NOT APPLICABLE
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE SEC STAFF ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF THE U.S. FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROVISION OF A LIMITED NUMBER
OF INTERNSHIPS TO RELATIVES OF SOVEREIGN WEALTH FUND OFFICIALS.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Order
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
08/18/2015
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 14,800,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
PREJUDGMENT INTEREST
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
DISGORGEMENT OF $8,300,000, PREJUDGMENT INTEREST OF $1,500,000 AND A CIVIL MONEY PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,000,000, FOR A
TOTAL PAYMENT OF $14,800,000. BNY MELLON EFFECTED PAYMENT ON AUGUST 24, 2015.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response

must fit within the space provided).
IN JANUARY 2011, THE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION OF THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (THE "SEC STAFF") INFORMED SEVERAL
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, INCLUDING THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION ("BNY MELLON"), THAT IT HAD COMMENCED AN INQUIRY INTO
CERTAIN OF THEIR BUSINESS PRACTICES AND RELATIONSHIPS WITH SOVEREIGN WEALTH FUND CLIENTS. IN THE THIRD QUARTER OF 2014, THE SEC
STAFF ISSUED WELLS NOTICES TO CERTAIN CURRENT AND FORMER EMPLOYEES OF BNY MELLON, INFORMING THEM THAT THE SEC STAFF HAD MADE A
PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION TO RECOMMEND ENFORCEMENT ACTION AGAINST THEM FOR ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF THE U.S. FOREIGN CORRUPT
PRACTICES ACT IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROVISION OF A LIMITED NUMBER OF INTERNSHIPS TO RELATIVES OF SOVEREIGN WEALTH FUND
OFFICIALS. BNY MELLON RECEIVED A SIMILAR WELLS NOTICE IN THE FOURTH QUARTER OF 2014. ON JANUARY 23, 2015, BNY MELLON RECEIVED AN
ADDITIONAL SUBPOENA FROM THE SEC EXPANDING THE SCOPE OF THE SEC'S INQUIRY INTO THE PROVISION OF INTERNSHIPS AND EMPLOYMENT
OPPORTUNITIES OFFERED TO OFFICIALS AND RELATIVES OF OFFICIALS AT GOVERNMENT-RELATED ENTITIES. ON AUGUST 18, 2015, THE SEC
ANNOUNCED THAT IT HAD ENTERED INTO AN ADMINISTRATIVE SETTLEMENT ON A NEITHER-ADMIT-NOR-DENY BASIS WITH BNY MELLON IN WHICH BNY
MELLON AGREED TO PAY $14.8 MILLION TO RESOLVE THIS INQUIRY. IN ADDITION, THE SEC HAS INDICATED THAT IT IS NO LONGER PURSUING ANY
CURRENT OR FORMER BNY MELLON EMPLOYEES IN CONNECTION WITH THIS MATTER.

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
THE BANK OF NEW YORK
MELLON CORPORATION
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No

NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
U.S. SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION
2.
Principal Sanction:
Cease and Desist
Other Sanctions: 
CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
01/12/2017
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
SEC RELEASE NO. 34-79777; ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING FILE NO. 3-17768
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
NOT APPLICABLE
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE SEC STAFF ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF SECTIONS 13(B)(2)(A) & (B) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR BOOKS AND RECORDS AND
INTERNAL REGULATORY ACCOUNTING CONTROL DEFICIENCIES IN CONNECTION WITH THE CALCULATION OF RISK-BASED REGULATORY CAPITAL
RATIOS PRESENTED IN ANNUAL AND QUARTERLY REPORTS FILED WITH THE SEC.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Order
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
01/12/2017
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 6,600,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
NOT APPLICABLE.
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
A CIVIL MONEY PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $6,600,000. BNY MELLON WILL EFFECT PAYMENT ON A DATE TBD.
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).

THIS ACTION ARISES OUT OF THE SEC'S ASSERTION THAT BNY MELLON FAILED TO PROPERLY INCLUDE APPROXIMATELY $14 BILLION OF CERTAIN
ASSETS OF VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES (THE "VIES") IN ITS CALCULATION OF RISK-BASED REGULATORY CAPITAL RATIOS PRESENTED IN ANNUAL AND
QUARTERLY REPORTS FILED WITH THE SEC. BEGINNING IN THE THIRD QUARTER OF 2010, THE SEC FOUND THAT BNY MELLON WAS REQUIRED TO
CONSOLIDATE THE ACCOUNTS OF CERTAIN VIES - WHICH TOOK THE FORM OF COLLATERALIZED LOAN OBLIGATIONS ("CLOS") - ONTO ITS BALANCE
SHEET PURSUANT TO APPLICABLE GUIDANCE ISSUED BY THE FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD IN JUNE 2009 (NOW CODIFIED IN ASC 810).
AS A RESULT OF ASC 810, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT RISK-BASED CAPITAL RULES REQUIRED BNY MELLON TO INCLUDE THE ASSETS OF THESE VIES IN
ITS RISK-WEIGHTED ASSETS FOR PURPOSES OF CALCULATING ITS REGULATORY CAPITAL RATIOS. AS THE SEC ORDER RELATES, BNY MELLON,
HOWEVER, DEVIATED FROM THE REGULATORY CAPITAL RULES WITHOUT THE NECESSARY AUTHORIZATION FROM THE FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD AND
EXCLUDED THESE ASSETS FROM ITS REGULATORY CAPITAL RATIOS AFTER MAKING A DETERMINATION THAT THE VIES DID NOT POSE A RISK TO THE
FIRM. THE SEC FOUND THAT (1) BNY MELLON'S EXCLUSION OF THE VIES CAUSED THE FIRM TO MISREPORT ITS RISK-BASED REGULATORY CAPITAL
RATIOS IN EACH OF ITS QUARTERLY AND ANNUAL REPORTS FROM THE THIRD QUARTER OF 2010 THROUGH THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2014, (2)
THROUGHOUT THIS TIME PERIOD, BNY MELLON FAILED TO MAKE AND KEEP ACCURATE BOOKS AND RECORDS WITH RESPECT TO ITS RISK-WEIGHTED
ASSETS AND REGULATORY CAPITAL RATIOS, AND (3) BNY MELLON ALSO FAILED TO DEVISE AND MAINTAIN A SYSTEM OF INTERNAL REGULATORY
ACCOUNTING CONTROLS SUFFICIENT TO PROVIDE REASONABLE ASSURANCES THAT ITS FINANCIAL STATEMENTS WERE PREPARED IN CONFORMITY
WITH APPLICABLE CRITERIA. ON JANUARY 12, 2017, THE SEC ANNOUNCED THAT IT HAD ENTERED INTO AN ADMINISTRATIVE SETTLEMENT ON A
NEITHER-ADMIT-NOR-DENY BASIS WITH BNY MELLON IN WHICH BNY MELLON AGREED TO PAY $6.6 MILLION.

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
THE BANK OF NEW YORK
MELLON CORPORATION
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 

B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK AND BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM (COLLECTIVELY, "FEDERAL RESERVE")
2.
Principal Sanction:
Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
Other Sanctions: 
NOT APPLICABLE
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
06/26/2017
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
17-016-CMP-HC
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
NOT APPLICABLE
6.
Principal Product Type:
No Product
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
THE FEDERAL RESERVE ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF REGULATION Y OF THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS (12 C.F.R. § 225) FOR ITS REGULATORY ACCOUNTING
TREATMENT OF CERTAIN ASSETS OF VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES (THE "VIES").
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Consent
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
06/26/2017
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 3,000,000.00
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
NOT APPLICABLE
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
A CIVIL MONEY PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,000,000. BNY MELLON EFFECTED PAYMENT ON OR ABOUT JUNE 27, 2017.

13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THIS ACTION ARISES OUT OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE'S ASSERTION THAT BNY MELLON FAILED TO PROPERLY INCLUDE APPROXIMATELY $14 BILLION OF
CERTAIN ASSETS OF VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES (THE "VIES") IN ITS CALCULATION OF ITS RISK-BASED REGULATORY CAPITAL RATIOS. BEGINNING IN
THE THIRD QUARTER OF 2010, THE FEDERAL RESERVE FOUND THAT BNY MELLON ACCOUNTED FOR THESE VIE ASSETS IN ITS "TRADING BOOK,"
WHEREIN IT ASSIGNED THE ASSETS A ZERO-RISK WEIGHTING UNDER A VALUE-AT-RISK MODEL. IT WAS DETERMINED THAT BNY MELLON'S REGULATORY
ACCOUNTING TREATMENT OF THE VIE ASSETS WAS IMPROPER UNDER THEN-APPLICABLE BASEL I REGULATORY RISK CAPITAL RULES. AS THE FEDERAL
RESERVE CONSENT ORDER RELATES, BNY MELLON DEVIATED FROM THE REGULATORY CAPITAL RULES WITHOUT THE NECESSARY AUTHORIZATION FROM
THE FEDERAL RESERVE AND EXCLUDED THESE ASSETS FROM ITS REGULATORY CAPITAL RATIOS FOR NEARLY 14 QUARTERS, RESULTING IN BNY MELLON
UNDERSTATING ITS RISK-WEIGHTED ASSETS AND OVERSTATING ITS RISK-BASED CAPITAL RATIOS. THE FEDERAL RESERVE FOUND THAT THIS CONDUCT
REPRESENTS OR RESULTED IN UNSAFE OR UNSOUND PRACTICES, AND A VIOLATION OF REGULATION Y OF THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS (12 C.F.R. §
225). ON JUNE 26, 2017, THE FEDERAL RESERVE ANNOUNCED THAT IT HAD ASSESSED BNY MELLON A CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $3
MILLION.

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D.,
11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV.
Regulatory Action
Check item(s) being responded to:
11.C(1)
11.C(2)
11.C(3)
11.C(4)
11.C(5)
11.D(1)
11.D(2)
11.D(3)
11.D(4)
11.D(5)
11.E(1)
11.E(2)
11.E(3)
11.E(4)
11.F.
11.G.
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page. 
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
THE BANK OF NEW YORK
MELLON CORPORATION
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item
11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.

 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Regulatory Action initiated by:
SEC   
Other Federal   
State   
SRO
Foreign
(Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) 
U.K. FINANCIAL CONDUCT AUTHORITY
2.
Principal Sanction:
Other
Other Sanctions: 
NO SANCTIONS WERE IMPOSED
3.
Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 
11/29/2017
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Docket/Case Number:
CMP/01-2016/CA98
5.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable):
NOT APPLICABLE
6.
Principal Product Type:
Equity Listed (Common & Preferred Stock)
Other Product Types: 
7.
Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided):
ON 21 FEBRUARY 2019, THE UK FINANCIAL CONDUCT AUTHORITY ("FCA") FOUND THAT NEWTON INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LIMITED ("NIM"), THROUGH
THE ACTIONS OF A FORMER EMPLOYEE IN 2014 AND 2015, SHARED INFORMATION WITH THREE OTHER UK INVESTMENT ADVISERS IN RELATION TO
TWO INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERINGS AND ONE PLACING BY UK ISSUERS BY DISCLOSING THE PRICE IT INTENDED TO PAY, OR ACCEPTING SUCH
INFORMATION, OR BOTH, SHORTLY BEFORE THE SHARE PRICES WERE SET. THE FCA FOUND THAT PARTS OF THIS CONDUCT VIOLATED THE UK
COMPETITION ACT 1998. NIM SELF-REPORTED THIS MATTER TO THE FCA FOLLOWING IDENTIFICATION OF THE ISSUE. THE FORMER EMPLOYEE'S
ACTIONS CONTRAVENED NIM'S CODE OF CONDUCT AND ETHICAL STANDARDS, AND THE EMPLOYEE HAS SINCE BEEN DISMISSED. THE BANK OF NEW
YORK MELLON CORPORATION ("BNYM") WAS FOUND JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY LIABLE BY REASON OF BEING NIM'S ULTIMATE PARENT COMPANY.
NEITHER BNYM NOR ANY OF ITS EMPLOYEES WAS INVOLVED IN ANY ASPECT OF THE RELEVANT CONDUCT AND THERE HAS BEEN NO ALLEGATION NOR
NEGATIVE FINDING BY THE FCA IN RESPECT OF THE CONDUCT OF BNYM.
8.
Current Status?      
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only.
10. How was matter resolved:
Order
11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY):
02/21/2019
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
THE FCA ISSUED THEIR DECISION ON 21 FEBRUARY 2019. THE FCA WILL PUBLISH A NON-CONFIDENTIAL VERSION OF ITS DECISION UNDER THE
COMPETITION ACT 1998 IN DUE COURSE.
12. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)?
 Monetary/Fine Amount: $
 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
 Disgorgement/Restitution
 Censure
 Cease and Desist/Injunction
 Bar
 Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions Ordered:
NO SANCTIONS WERE IMPOSED

Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived: 
NOT APPLICABLE
13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response
must fit within the space provided).
THE FCA ISSUED THEIR DECISION ON 21 FEBRUARY 2019. THE FCA WILL PUBLISH A NON-CONFIDENTIAL VERSION OF ITS DECISION UNDER THE
COMPETITION ACT 1998 IN DUE COURSE.

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Item 11.H. of Part
1A or Item 2.F. of Part 1B of Form ADV.
Civil Judicial
Check Part 1A item(s) being responded to:
11.H(1)(a)
11.H(1)(b)
11.H(1)(c)
11.H(2)
Check Part 1B item(s) being responded to:
2.F(1)
2.F(2)
2.F(3)
2.F(4)
2.F(5)
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page.
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Item 11.H. of Part 1A or Item 2.F. of Part 1B. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. Unrelated civil judicial actions must be reported on separate DRPs.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
THE BANK OF NEW YORK
MELLON CORPORATION
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.H.
(1)(a), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the
circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.

 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Court Action initiated by: (Name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, SRO, commodities exchange, agency, firm, private plaintiff, etc.) 
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
2.
Principal Relief Sought:
Injunction
Other Relief Sought: 
CIVIL PENALTIES/FINES; DISGORGEMENT; MONEY DAMAGES (PRIVATE/CIVIL COMPLAINT); RESTITUTION; RESTRAINING ORDER.
3.
Filing Date of Court Action (MM/DD/YYYY):
10/04/2011
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Principal Product Type:
Other
Other Product Types: 
FOREIGN EXCHANGE SERVICES
5.
Formal Action was brought in (include name of Federal, State or Foreign Court, Location of Court - City or County and State or Country, Docket/Case
Number): 
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK; INDEX NO: 09/114735
6.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the civil judicial action (if applicable): 
NOT APPLICABLE
7.
Describe the allegations related to this civil action (your response must fit within the space provided): 
THE LAWSUIT ALLEGES THAT THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON (THE "BANK") IMPROPERLY CHARGED AND REPORTED PRICES FOR STANDING
INSTRUCTION FOREIGN EXCHANGE ("FX") TRANSACTIONS EXECUTED IN CONNECTION WITH CUSTODY SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE BANK. THE
REGISTRANT IS NOT A DEFENDANT TO THIS ACTION.
8.
Current Status? 
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, action appealed to (provide name of court) and Date Appeal Filed (MM/DD/YYYY): 
10. If pending, date notice/process was served (MM/DD/YYYY):
10/04/2011
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 14 only.
11. How was matter resolved:
Settled
12. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 
10/26/2015
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
BNY MELLON AND THE PLAINTIFFS REACHED A SETTLEMENT IN PRINCIPLE ON MARCH 19, 2015. THE SETTLEMENT WAS APPROVED BY JUDGE LEWIS
KAPLAN OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ON SEPTEMBER 24, 2015. THE DEADLINE TO APPEAL
THE APPROVAL OF THE SETTLEMENT EXPIRED ON OCTOBER 26, 2015.
13. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered or Relief Granted(check appropriate items)?
Monetary/Fine Amount: $
Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
Disgorgement/Restitution
Censure
Cease and Desist/Injunction
Bar
Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions:
THERE WERE NO SANCTIONS ORDERED OR RELIEF GRANTED.
C.
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to

requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement, or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived:
THERE WERE NO SANCTIONS ORDERED OR RELIEF GRANTED.
14. Provide a brief summary of circumstances related to the action(s), allegation(s), disposition(s) and/or finding(s) disclosed above (your response must
fit within the space provided). 
ON OCTOBER 4, 2011, THE NEW YORK ATTORNEY GENERAL'S ("NYAG") OFFICE FILED A COMPLAINT AGAINST THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
CORPORATION, THE PARENT COMPANY OF THE REGISTRANT ("BNY MELLON"). THIS COMPLAINT SUPERSEDES A QUI TAM COMPLAINT FILED BY A
PRIVATE RELATOR. ON FEBRUARY 16, 2012, THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK FILED A COMPLAINT AGAINST
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON ("THE BANK"), AN AFFILIATE OF THE REGISTRANT. ON MARCH 19, 2015, BNY MELLON ANNOUNCED THAT IT HAS
RESOLVED SUBSTANTIALLY ALL OF THE FOREIGN EXCHANGE ("FX")-RELATED ACTIONS CURRENTLY PENDING AGAINST BNY MELLON AND THE BANK
(TOGETHER, THE "COMPANY"), RESULTING IN A TOTAL OF $714 MILLION IN SETTLEMENT PAYMENTS. WITH REGARD TO THIS ACTION, THE COMPANY
HAS REACHED A SETTLEMENT WITH THE NYAG, WHICH FULLY RESOLVES THE NYAG'S LAWSUIT REGARDING STANDING INSTRUCTION FX TRANSACTIONS
IN CONNECTION WITH CERTAIN CUSTODY SERVICES THE BANK PROVIDED PRIOR TO EARLY 2012 TO ITS CUSTODY CLIENTS. UNDER THE TERMS OF THE
SETTLEMENT, WHICH HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE COURT, THE BANK PAID THE NYAG $167.5 MILLION, AFTER WHICH A NOTICE OF DISCONTINUANCE
WAS SUBMITTED TO THE COURT, AND PROVIDED FUNCTIONALITY ALLOWING CUSTOMERS TO COMPARE PRICING FOR BNY MELLON'S "DEFINED
SPREAD" AND "SESSION RANGE" STANDING INSTRUCTION FX PRODUCTS.

Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an 
INITIAL OR
AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Item 11.H. of Part
1A or Item 2.F. of Part 1B of Form ADV.
Civil Judicial
Check Part 1A item(s) being responded to:
11.H(1)(a)
11.H(1)(b)
11.H(1)(c)
11.H(2)
Check Part 1B item(s) being responded to:
2.F(1)
2.F(2)
2.F(3)
2.F(4)
2.F(5)
Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File
with a completed Execution Page.
One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Item 11.H. of Part 1A or Item 2.F. of Part 1B. Use only one DRP to report details related to the
same event. Unrelated civil judicial actions must be reported on separate DRPs.
PART I
A.  The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are):
You (the advisory firm)
You and one or more of your advisory affiliates
One or more of your advisory affiliates
If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). 
If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box.
ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE
CRD
Number:
This advisory affiliate is 
a Firm
an Individual
Registered:
Yes
No
Name:
THE BANK OF NEW YORK
MELLON CORPORATION
(For individuals, Last, First,
Middle)
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is
registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the
adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor.
If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.H.
(1)(a), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any
event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago.
This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the

circumstances: 
B.
If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to
the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided.
 Yes
 No
NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records.
PART II
1.  Court Action initiated by: (Name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, SRO, commodities exchange, agency, firm, private plaintiff, etc.) 
OHIO POLICE & FIRE PENSION FUND AND SCHOOL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF OHIO
2.
Principal Relief Sought:
Money Damages (Private/Civil Complaint)
Other Relief Sought: 
RESTITUTION, DISGORGEMENT
3.
Filing Date of Court Action (MM/DD/YYYY):
03/12/2012
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
4.
Principal Product Type:
Other
Other Product Types: 
FOREIGN EXCHANGE SERVICES
5.
Formal Action was brought in (include name of Federal, State or Foreign Court, Location of Court - City or County and State or Country, Docket/Case
Number): 
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO; 12CV-03-3214
6.
Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the civil judicial action (if applicable): 
NOT APPLICABLE
7.
Describe the allegations related to this civil action (your response must fit within the space provided): 
THIS LAWSUIT ALLEGES THAT THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION ("BNY MELLON") IMPROPERLY CHARGED AND REPORTED PRICES FOR
STANDING INSTRUCTION FOREIGN EXCHANGE ("FX") TRANSACTIONS EXECUTED IN CONNECTION WITH CUSTODY SERVICES PROVIDED BY BNY MELLON.
PLAINTIFFS ASSERT CLAIMS FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT, FRAUD, VIOLATION OF THE OHIO DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICES ACT AND UNJUST
ENRICHMENT. THE REGISTRANT IS NOT A DEFENDANT TO THIS ACTION.
8.
Current Status? 
 Pending
 On Appeal
 Final
9.
If on appeal, action appealed to (provide name of court) and Date Appeal Filed (MM/DD/YYYY): 
10. If pending, date notice/process was served (MM/DD/YYYY):
03/19/2012
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
SERVICE WAS ATTEMPTED ON MARCH 19, 2012.
If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 14 only.
11. How was matter resolved:
Settled
12. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 
10/26/2015
 Exact
 Explanation
If not exact, provide explanation:
BNY MELLON AND THE PLAINTIFFS REACHED A SETTLEMENT IN PRINCIPLE ON MARCH 19, 2015. THE SETTLEMENT WAS APPROVED BY JUDGE LEWIS
KAPLAN OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ON SEPTEMBER 24, 2015. THE DEADLINE TO APPEAL
THE APPROVAL OF THE SETTLEMENT EXPIRED ON OCTOBER 26, 2015.
13. Resolution Detail:
A.  Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered or Relief Granted(check appropriate items)?
Monetary/Fine Amount: $
Revocation/Expulsion/Denial
Disgorgement/Restitution

Censure
Cease and Desist/Injunction
Bar
Suspension
B.
Other Sanctions:
THERE WERE NO SANCTIONS ORDERED OR RELIEF GRANTED.
C.
Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal,
Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to
requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution,
disgorgement, or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion
of penalty was waived:
THERE WERE NO SANCTIONS ORDERED OR RELIEF GRANTED.
14. Provide a brief summary of circumstances related to the action(s), allegation(s), disposition(s) and/or finding(s) disclosed above (your response must
fit within the space provided). 
ON MARCH 19, 2015, BNY MELLON, THE PARENT COMPANY TO THE REGISTRANT, ANNOUNCED THAT IT HAS RESOLVED SUBSTANTIALLY ALL OF THE
FOREIGN EXCHANGE ("FX")-RELATED ACTIONS CURRENTLY PENDING AGAINST BNY MELLON, RESULTING IN A TOTAL OF $714 MILLION IN SETTLEMENT
PAYMENTS. THIS ACTION WAS PART OF A CONSOLIDATED CUSTOMER CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT. BNY MELLON REACHED A SETTLEMENT WITH THE
PLAINTIFFS IN THE CUSTOMER CLASS ACTIONS RELATED TO STANDING INSTRUCTION FX TRANSACTIONS. UNDER THIS SETTLEMENT, WHICH HAS BEEN
APPROVED BY THE COURT, BNY MELLON PAID $335 MILLION.