Assets under management Growth by Quarter
Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.
Private Funds
Private funds reported by Qic Investments No. 1 Pty Ltd.
Employee Growth by Quarter
Quarterly points use the latest ADV filing or SEC roster snapshot available in each quarter.
Historical AUM and employee figures reflect available SEC Form ADV filings under this CRD. Filing gaps may reflect registration status changes, dormant periods, state registration periods, firm restructuring, or other reporting changes. Rialytix does not interpolate missing periods.
Ownership
Reported direct and indirect ownership ranges
Reported ownership ranges
Highlighted bands show the percentage range reported in Form ADV.
Bars represent the reported range at that individual ownership step, not an estimated percentage of the advisory firm. Indirect relationships may refer to intermediate entities rather than directly to Qic Investments No. 1 Pty Ltd..
Reported ownership and control details
Form ADV · Filing date 2026-09-28 · Schedules A and B
| # | Owner / person & role | Interest in entity | Reported interest | Control person | Title / status acquired | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | QIC LIMITEDDIRECT OWNERForeign entity | QIC INVESTMENTS NO. 1 PTY LTD | 75% or moreCode E | Yes | DIRECT OWNER10/2006 | Schedule APDF page 93 |
| 2 | JOHN MARTIN GALLAGHERCHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICERIndividual | QIC INVESTMENTS NO. 1 PTY LTD | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER09/2020 | Schedule APDF page 93 |
| 3 | Ross Daniel IsraelDIRECTORIndividual | QIC INVESTMENTS NO. 1 PTY LTD | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | DIRECTOR11/2021 | Schedule APDF page 93 |
| 4 | William Stephen WhatmoreDIRECTORIndividual | QIC INVESTMENTS NO. 1 PTY LTD | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | DIRECTOR11/2021 | Schedule APDF page 93 |
| 5 | William Thomas BurtonDIRECTORIndividual | QIC INVESTMENTS NO. 1 PTY LTD | Less than 5%Code NA | Yes | DIRECTOR12/2024 | Schedule APDF page 93 |
| 6 | THE STATE OF QUEENSLAND, AUSTRALIAINDIRECT OWNERForeign entity | QIC LIMITED | 75% or moreCode E | Yes | INDIRECT OWNER10/1991 | Schedule BPDF page 94 |
Less than 5% may include zero. Code F identifies a role without specifying a percentage. Reported interests may overlap and may not include every owner. Total indirect ownership is not calculated.
Compliance & Disclosures
Filing dated 6/9/2026 2:06:29 PM
Responses were selected by the RIA in its filing. Questions are shortened for readability; “you” refers to the reporting firm, and some questions also cover advisory affiliates.
AFelonies2 No
In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:
- A1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a felony?No
- A2Been charged with a felony?No
BMisdemeanors2 No
In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate:
- B1Been convicted of or pleaded guilty or no contest to a misdemeanor involving investments, an investment-related business, fraud, false statements or omissions, wrongful taking of property, bribery, perjury, forgery, counterfeiting, or extortion?No
- B2Been charged with a misdemeanor of the kind listed above?No
CSEC or CFTC actions5 No
Has the SEC or CFTC ever:
- C1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
- C2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated SEC or CFTC regulations or statutes?No
- C3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- C4Entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
- C5Imposed a civil money penalty on you or an advisory affiliate, or ordered you or an advisory affiliate to cease and desist from any activity?No
DOther regulatory actions1 Yes4 No
Has any other federal regulatory agency, state regulatory agency, or foreign financial regulatory authority ever:
- D1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission, or was dishonest, unfair, or unethical?No
- D2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related regulations or statutes?Yes
- D3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- D4In the past ten years, entered an order against you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
- D5Denied, suspended, or revoked your or an advisory affiliate’s registration or license, or otherwise prevented association with an investment-related business or restricted activities?No
ESelf-regulatory organization actions4 No
Has a self-regulatory organization or commodities exchange ever:
- E1Found you or an advisory affiliate made a false statement or omission?No
- E2Found you or an advisory affiliate violated its rules, other than a violation designated as a minor rule violation under an SEC-approved plan?No
- E3Found you or an advisory affiliate caused an investment-related business to have its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?No
- E4Disciplined you or an advisory affiliate by expulsion, suspension, barring association with other members, or otherwise restricting activities?No
FProfessional authorizations1 No
- FHas an authorization to act as an attorney, accountant, or federal contractor granted to you or an advisory affiliate ever been revoked or suspended?No
GPending regulatory proceedings1 No
- GAre you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a regulatory proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of C, D, or E?No
HCivil judicial actions and proceedings4 No
(1) Court actions
Has a domestic or foreign court:
- H(1)(a)In the past ten years, enjoined you or an advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?No
- H(1)(b)Found that you or an advisory affiliate violated investment-related statutes or regulations?No
- H(1)(c)Dismissed, pursuant to a settlement agreement, an investment-related civil action brought against you or an advisory affiliate by a state or foreign financial regulatory authority?No
(2) Pending civil proceedings
- H(2)Are you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of a civil proceeding that could result in a “Yes” answer to any part of H(1)?No
Additional DRP filings 2 source blocks
Verbatim excerpts from supporting DRP filings, which may concern the firm or advisory affiliates. Amounts retain their filed labels; no total or attribution is inferred.
regulatory · block 1Jepsen, Rune, MouPDF pages 95–97
- Advisory affiliate name — filed text
- Jepsen, Rune, Mou
- Regulator name — filed text
- KOMISJA NADZORU FINANSOWEGO (KNF)
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 22,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Order
Action status / disposition — filed text
A CASSATION APPEAL CHALLENGING THE JUDGMENT ISSUED BY THE VOIVODESHIP ADMINISTRATIVE COURT (WSA) AND VALIDITY OF THE PENALTY IMPOSED BY KNF WAS FILED IN THE SUPREME ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IN WARSAW (NSA) ON APRIL 19, 2022. THE MONETARY FINE IMPOSED BY KNF WAS PAID BY MR. JEPSEN PROMPTLY AFTER THE DECISION WAS ENTERED, AS REQUIRED BY LAW. MR. JEPSEN'S ATTORNEYS PLAN TO FILE NEXT SUBMISSION WITH THE SUPREME ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IN ORDER TO PRESENT ADDITIONAL LEGAL ARGUMENTATION. THEY EXPECT THAT INFORMATION ABOUT THE SCHEDULING OF THE HEARING TO CONSIDER THE COMPLAINT WILL BE DELIVERED SHORTLY. THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS WERE INITIATED BY THE KNF DUE TO PRIOR FINDINGS OF VIOLATIONS COMMITTED BY GETBACK S.A. AS THE ISSUER (THE PUBLIC COMPANY). THE MONETARY FINE AGAINST MR. JEPSEN WAS AUTOMATICALLY IMPOSED IN CONNECTION WITH THE VIOLATIONS COMMITTED BY THE ISSUER, WITHOUT EXAMINATION OF HIS ACTUALINVOLVEMENT IN THE VIOLATION BY THE COMPANY.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
THE KNF COMMENCED ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH MR. JEPSEN'S ROLE AS A MEMBER OF THE SUPERVISORY BOARD OF THE POLISH PUBLICLY LISTED COMPANY GETBACK S.A. (GB), A FORMER PORTFOLIO COMPANY INVESTMENT MADE BY QIC'S PRIVATE EQUITY TEAM. THE KNF ALLEGED IMPROPER PERFORMANCE OF OBLIGATIONS IN CONNECTION WITH PREPARATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IN FY 2017 AND FAILURE TO TIMELY PREPARE THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR 2017 AND CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR 2018, AND PERIODIC CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FY 2018Q1.
Sanction detail — filed text
MR. JEPSEN WAS ORDERED TO PAY A FINE OF PLN 80,000 (APPROXIMATELY $22,000) ON AUGUST 20, 2021. MR.JEPSEN PAID THE FINE PROMPTLY AFTER THE DECISION WAS ENTERED, SUBJECT TO HIS APPEAL DISCLOSED BELOW.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE CRD Number: 7816450 This advisory affiliate is a Firm an Individual Registered: Yes No Name: Jepsen, Rune, Mou (For individuals, Last, First, Middle) This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) KOMISJA NADZORU FINANSOWEGO (KNF) 2. Principal Sanction: Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s) Other Sanctions: 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 01/14/2020 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: KNF: DPS-DPSZA.1.456.3.2020.IF 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): QIC PRIVATE CAPITAL PTY LTD 6. Principal Product Type: No Product Other Product Types: 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): THE KNF COMMENCED ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH MR. JEPSEN'S ROLE AS A MEMBER OF THE SUPERVISORY BOARD OF THE POLISH PUBLICLY LISTED COMPANY GETBACK S.A. (GB), A FORMER PORTFOLIO COMPANY INVESTMENT MADE BY QIC'S PRIVATE EQUITY TEAM. THE KNF ALLEGED IMPROPER PERFORMANCE OF OBLIGATIONS IN CONNECTION WITH PREPARATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IN FY 2017 AND FAILURE TO TIMELY PREPARE THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR 2017 AND CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR 2018, AND PERIODIC CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FY 2018Q1. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: THE APPEAL TO THE VOIVODESHIP ADMINISTRATIVE COURT (WSA) WAS FILED AT 23 SEPTEMBER 2021. THE CASSATION APPEAL TO THE SUPREME ADMINISTRATIVE COURT (NSA) WAS FILED AT 19 APRIL 2022. If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Order 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 08/20/2021 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 22,000.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: MR. JEPSEN WAS ORDERED TO PAY A FINE OF PLN 80,000 (APPROXIMATELY $22,000) ON AUGUST 20, 2021. MR.JEPSEN PAID THE FINE PROMPTLY AFTER THE DECISION WAS ENTERED, SUBJECT TO HIS APPEAL DISCLOSED BELOW. 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). A CASSATION APPEAL CHALLENGING THE JUDGMENT ISSUED BY THE VOIVODESHIP ADMINISTRATIVE COURT (WSA) AND VALIDITY OF THE PENALTY IMPOSED BY KNF WAS FILED IN THE SUPREME ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IN WARSAW (NSA) ON APRIL 19, 2022. THE MONETARY FINE IMPOSED BY KNF WAS PAID BY MR. JEPSEN PROMPTLY AFTER THE DECISION WAS ENTERED, AS REQUIRED BY LAW. MR. JEPSEN'S ATTORNEYS PLAN TO FILE NEXT SUBMISSION WITH THE SUPREME ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IN ORDER TO PRESENT ADDITIONAL LEGAL ARGUMENTATION. THEY EXPECT THAT INFORMATION ABOUT THE SCHEDULING OF THE HEARING TO CONSIDER THE COMPLAINT WILL BE DELIVERED SHORTLY. THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS WERE INITIATED BY THE KNF DUE TO PRIOR FINDINGS OF VIOLATIONS COMMITTED BY GETBACK S.A. AS THE ISSUER (THE PUBLIC COMPANY). THE MONETARY FINE AGAINST MR. JEPSEN WAS AUTOMATICALLY IMPOSED IN CONNECTION WITH THE VIOLATIONS COMMITTED BY THE ISSUER, WITHOUT EXAMINATION OF HIS ACTUALINVOLVEMENT IN THE VIOLATION BY THE COMPANY.
regulatory · block 2Jepsen, Rune, MouPDF pages 97–99
- Advisory affiliate name — filed text
- Jepsen, Rune, Mou
- Regulator name — filed text
- KOMISJA NADZORU FINANSOWEGO (KNF)
- Monetary/Fine Amount — filed text
- $ 33,000.00
- How was matter resolved — filed text
- Order
Action status / disposition — filed text
MR. JEPSEN WAS ORDERED TO PAY FINES AMOUNTING TO PLN 120,000 (APPROXIMATELY $33,000) (THEINDIVIDUAL FINES AMOUNTED TO, RESPECTIVELY, PLN 70,000 (APPROXIMATELY $19,300), PLN 20,000(APPROXIMATELY $5,500) AND PLN 30,000 (APPROXIMATELY $8,300)) ON SEPTEMBER 15, 2023. FINES WERE PROMPTLY PAID AFTER THE DECISION WAS ENTERED. AN APPEAL CHALLENGING THE VALIDITY OFTHE PENALTIES WAS FILED WITH THE VOIVODESHIP ADMINISTRATIVE COURT ON 6 NOVEMBER 2023. THE PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE VOIVODESHIP ADMINISTRATIVE COURT ARE SUSPENDED UNTIL THE END OFRELATED PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE SUPREME ADMINISTRATIVE COURT WHICH GETBACK S.A., BEING AN ISSUER, IS A PARTY TO. THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS WERE INITIATED BY THE KNF DUE TO PRIOR FINDINGS OF VIOLATIONS COMMITTED BY GETBACK S.A. AS THE ISSUER (THE PUBLIC COMPANY). THE MONETARY FINE AGAINST MR. JEPSEN WAS AUTOMATICALLY IMPOSED IN CONNECTION WITH THE VIOLATIONS COMMITTED BY THE ISSUER WITHOUT EXAMINATION OF HIS ACTUAL INVOLVEMENT IN THE VIOLATION OF THE COMPANY.
Other filed details
Description of allegations — filed text
THE KNF COMMENCED ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH MR. JEPSEN'S ROLE AS A MEMBER OF THE SUPERVISORY BOARD OF THE POLISH PUBLICLY LISTED COMPANY GETBACK S.A. (GB), A FORMER PORTFOLIO COMPANY INVESTMENT MADE BY QIC'S PRIVATE EQUITY TEAM. THE KNF ALLEGED GROSS BREACH BY GB OF ITS DISCLOSURE OBLIGATIONS DURING THE PERIOD WHEN MR. JEPSEN WAS A MEMBER OF GB'S SUPERVISORY BOARD, REFERRED IN THE MARKET ABUSE REGULATIONS (MAR) BY IMPROPER PERFORMANCE AND FAILURE TO PERFORMTHE DISCLOSURE OBLIGATIONS BY GB.
Sanction detail — filed text
MR. JEPSEN WAS ORDERED TO PAY FINES AMOUNTING TO PLN 120,000 (APPROXIMATELY $33,000)(THE INDIVIDUAL FINES AMOUNTED TO, RESPECTIVELY, PLN 70,000 (APPROXIMATELY $19,300), PLN 20,000 (APPROXIMATELY $5,500) AND PLN 30,000 (APPROXIMATELY $8,300)) ON SEPTEMBER 15, 2023. FINES WERE PROMPTLY PAID AFTER THE DECISION WAS ENTERED.
Full extracted filing text
Includes form instructions and options. Options shown in this text do not identify which boxes were selected.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS This Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP ADV) is an INITIAL OR AMENDED response used to report details for affirmative responses to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. of Form ADV. Regulatory Action Check item(s) being responded to: 11.C(1) 11.C(2) 11.C(3) 11.C(4) 11.C(5) 11.D(1) 11.D(2) 11.D(3) 11.D(4) 11.D(5) 11.E(1) 11.E(2) 11.E(3) 11.E(4) 11.F. 11.G. Use a separate DRP for each event or proceeding . The same event or proceeding may be reported for more than one person or entity using one DRP. File with a completed Execution Page. One event may result in more than one affirmative answer to Items 11.C., 11.D., 11.E., 11.F. or 11.G. Use only one DRP to report details related to the same event. If an event gives rise to actions by more than one regulator, provide details for each action on a separate DRP. PART I A. The person(s) or entity(ies) for whom this DRP is being filed is (are): You (the advisory firm) You and one or more of your advisory affiliates One or more of your advisory affiliates If this DRP is being filed for an advisory affiliate, give the full name of the advisory affiliate below (for individuals, Last name, First name, Middle name). If the advisory affiliate has a CRD number, provide that number. If not, indicate "non-registered" by checking the appropriate box. ADV DRP - ADVISORY AFFILIATE CRD Number: 7816450 This advisory affiliate is a Firm an Individual Registered: Yes No Name: Jepsen, Rune, Mou (For individuals, Last, First, Middle) This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because the advisory affiliate(s) is no longer associated with the adviser. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because: (1) the event or proceeding occurred more than ten years ago or (2) the adviser is registered or applying for registration with the SEC or reporting as an exempt reporting adviser with the SEC and the event was resolved in the adviser's or advisory affiliate's favor. If you are registered or registering with a state securities authority , you may remove a DRP for an event you reported only in response to Item 11.D(4), and only if that event occurred more than ten years ago. If you are registered or registering with the SEC, you may remove a DRP for any event listed in Item 11 that occurred more than ten years ago. This DRP should be removed from the ADV record because it was filed in error, such as due to a clerical or data-entry mistake. Explain the circumstances: B. If the advisory affiliate is registered through the IARD system or CRD system, has the advisory affiliate submitted a DRP (with Form ADV, BD or U-4) to the IARD or CRD for the event? If the answer is "Yes," no other information on this DRP must be provided. Yes No NOTE: The completion of this form does not relieve the advisory affiliate of its obligation to update its IARD or CRD records. PART II 1. Regulatory Action initiated by: SEC Other Federal State SRO Foreign (Full name of regulator, foreign financial regulatory authority, federal, state, or SRO) KOMISJA NADZORU FINANSOWEGO (KNF) 2. Principal Sanction: Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s) Other Sanctions: 3. Date Initiated (MM/DD/YYYY): 01/05/2022 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 4. Docket/Case Number: CASE NUMBER OF PROCEEDINGS CONDUCTED BY KNF IN FIRST INSTANCE: DPS-DPSZA3.456.2.2022.MS (FORMERLY: DPS-DPSZA3.456.2.2022.EK) 5. Advisory Affiliate Employing Firm when activity occurred which led to the regulatory action (if applicable): QIC PRIVATE CAPITAL PTY LTD 6. Principal Product Type: No Product Other Product Types: 7. Describe the allegations related to this regulatory action (your response must fit within the space provided): THE KNF COMMENCED ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH MR. JEPSEN'S ROLE AS A MEMBER OF THE SUPERVISORY BOARD OF THE POLISH PUBLICLY LISTED COMPANY GETBACK S.A. (GB), A FORMER PORTFOLIO COMPANY INVESTMENT MADE BY QIC'S PRIVATE EQUITY TEAM. THE KNF ALLEGED GROSS BREACH BY GB OF ITS DISCLOSURE OBLIGATIONS DURING THE PERIOD WHEN MR. JEPSEN WAS A MEMBER OF GB'S SUPERVISORY BOARD, REFERRED IN THE MARKET ABUSE REGULATIONS (MAR) BY IMPROPER PERFORMANCE AND FAILURE TO PERFORMTHE DISCLOSURE OBLIGATIONS BY GB. 8. Current Status? Pending On Appeal Final 9. If on appeal, regulatory action appealed to (SEC, SRO, Federal or State Court) and Date Appeal Filed: THE APPEAL TO THE VOIVODESHIP ADMINISTRATIVE COURT WAS FILED AT 6 NOVEMBER 2023. If Final or On Appeal, complete all items below. For Pending Actions, complete Item 13 only. 10. How was matter resolved: Order 11. Resolution Date (MM/DD/YYYY): 09/15/2023 Exact Explanation If not exact, provide explanation: 12. Resolution Detail: A. Were any of the following Sanctions Ordered (check all appropriate items)? Monetary/Fine Amount: $ 33,000.00 Revocation/Expulsion/Denial Disgorgement/Restitution Censure Cease and Desist/Injunction Bar Suspension B. Other Sanctions Ordered: Sanction detail: if suspended, enjoined or barred, provide duration including start date and capacities affected (General Securities Principal, Financial Operations Principal, etc.). If requalification by exam/retraining was a condition of the sanction, provide length of time given to requalify/retrain, type of exam required and whether condition has been satisfied. If disposition resulted in a fine, penalty, restitution, disgorgement or monetary compensation, provide total amount, portion levied against you or an advisory affiliate, date paid and if any portion of penalty was waived: MR. JEPSEN WAS ORDERED TO PAY FINES AMOUNTING TO PLN 120,000 (APPROXIMATELY $33,000)(THE INDIVIDUAL FINES AMOUNTED TO, RESPECTIVELY, PLN 70,000 (APPROXIMATELY $19,300), PLN 20,000 (APPROXIMATELY $5,500) AND PLN 30,000 (APPROXIMATELY $8,300)) ON SEPTEMBER 15, 2023. FINES WERE PROMPTLY PAID AFTER THE DECISION WAS ENTERED. 13. Provide a brief summary of details related to the action status and (or) disposition and include relevant terms, conditions and dates (your response must fit within the space provided). MR. JEPSEN WAS ORDERED TO PAY FINES AMOUNTING TO PLN 120,000 (APPROXIMATELY $33,000) (THEINDIVIDUAL FINES AMOUNTED TO, RESPECTIVELY, PLN 70,000 (APPROXIMATELY $19,300), PLN 20,000(APPROXIMATELY $5,500) AND PLN 30,000 (APPROXIMATELY $8,300)) ON SEPTEMBER 15, 2023. FINES WERE PROMPTLY PAID AFTER THE DECISION WAS ENTERED. AN APPEAL CHALLENGING THE VALIDITY OFTHE PENALTIES WAS FILED WITH THE VOIVODESHIP ADMINISTRATIVE COURT ON 6 NOVEMBER 2023. THE PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE VOIVODESHIP ADMINISTRATIVE COURT ARE SUSPENDED UNTIL THE END OFRELATED PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE SUPREME ADMINISTRATIVE COURT WHICH GETBACK S.A., BEING AN ISSUER, IS A PARTY TO. THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS WERE INITIATED BY THE KNF DUE TO PRIOR FINDINGS OF VIOLATIONS COMMITTED BY GETBACK S.A. AS THE ISSUER (THE PUBLIC COMPANY). THE MONETARY FINE AGAINST MR. JEPSEN WAS AUTOMATICALLY IMPOSED IN CONNECTION WITH THE VIOLATIONS COMMITTED BY THE ISSUER WITHOUT EXAMINATION OF HIS ACTUAL INVOLVEMENT IN THE VIOLATION OF THE COMPANY.
* Metrics are based on the latest available data, including Form ADV filings, brochures, and relationship summaries pulled from the SEC IAPD, and may be subject to change. Learn what is included in the Rialytix data. Please refer to the firm's official disclosures for the most accurate information using their CRD number. This is not investment advice.